Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

U-shaped association between untreated caries and body mass index in adults at Rabat dental University hospital, Morocco: cross sectional study

BMC Research Notes201710:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2356-0

Received: 22 May 2016

Accepted: 20 December 2016

Published: 3 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Many previous studies estimating the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and dental decay are conflicting. Most studies, however, examine the relationship using BMI as a categorical variable. This study evaluated the non-linear association between body mass index as a continuous variable and untreated dental decay.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of adults free of diseases attending a tertiary dental clinic was conducted. The number of untreated caries at the time of consultation was assessed using the WHO criteria. A multivariable Poisson regression model for severity of untreated dental decay was first established. Restricted cubic spline functions were used to consider potential non-linear associations between BMI and untreated dental caries.

Results

After multivariable adjustment, the prevalence ratios (PR) for the number of dental decay remained significantly associated with the age at beginning tooth brushing (PR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.25), BMI < normal (PR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.30–2.12), BMI > normal (PR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.65), SDI (PR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.75) and GI (PR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.30–1.94). When BMI was evaluated as continuous variable, it exhibited a significant U-shaped pattern with the number of untreated dental decay both in univariable and multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

The rate of untreated tooth decay was associated with both under- and overweight status.

Keywords

High body mass indexLow body mass indexCaries severityNon linear association

Background

Both oral and general health status depends on a dynamic interplay, including the individual’s behaviour, particularly eating behaviours. Behavioural and lifestyle-related factors are significant contributors to dental caries initiation and development [1].

Despite improvements in preventive measures, dental caries remains highly prevalent, especially among specific groups. As a chronic disease, dental caries reflects the cumulative effect of harmful socio-economic, biological, and behavioural factors that occurred during the lifespan of a person [2, 3].

Based on the impact of dental health status on food choice [46], the association between dental caries and nutritional status was previously explored [710]. The exact underlying mechanism for the relationship is not clear. Untreated dental caries may cause changing eating patterns, but, eating patterns may increase the individual risk of developing more dental decay.

Until now, two hypotheses regarding the association between dental caries and BMI have been suggested: a positive association [5, 79] and a null association [10].

Most of these studies have used only a non-parametric approach [5, 710], by treating BMI as a categorical variable. However, Royston, et al. pointed out a number of disadvantages with this approach [11]. The most significant drawback is the loss of information and strength through what is equivalent to rounding.

Additionally, most studies have focused on adolescents and ignored the cumulative effect of unfavourable eating behaviour among adults.

Based on the assumption that untreated dental caries might decrease as well as increase energy intake, a U-curved association in which people with underweight and overweight report more untreated dental caries compared to people with a normal weight, may be expected. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether a non-linear association may be expected between the number of untreated dental decay and BMI by maintaining BMI as continuous variable.

In addition, we examined whether socioeconomic factors may moderate this association among adults attending a tertiary health care centre in Morocco.

Methods

Study population

The present study included healthy patients older than 18 who were recruited from among adults seeking routine dental care at the school teaching hospital at Rabat Morocco. Eligible patients were volunteer adults with no history of other health conditions.

Adults treated for any other health condition or seeking the dental hospital for dental emergency needs were excluded.

The recruitment phase of the study was conducted between March and May 2012. Data in the present study were recorded from questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and oral examination.

Definition of variables

Eligible adults were interviewed during their dental attendance. All interviews were conducted using a structured questionnaire designed for the present study, which included information on demographic data (age and gender), general health, education level, monthly family income and oral health behaviour.

Data were collected ensuring the privacy and confidentiality by face-to-face interviews and document review.

The monthly family income was measured relative to the Moroccan minimum wage during the period of data gathering. Three-point scales were used (low, moderate and high).

Educational level was divided into three categories: low (none or primary), average (secondary) and high (university education).

Oral health behaviours included information on frequency of tooth brushing and when the patients started tooth brushing. Frequency of tooth brushing was divided into brushing twice a day, more than twice a day and once or less a day. Brushing motion was also recorded as appropriate or inappropriate.

The nature of dental attendance was noted according to a two-category system (planned visit, acute visit).

Anthropometric measurements

The interviewer measured the weight (kg) and height (m) at the time of interview and computed BMI. BMI was computed as weight divided by squared height (kg/m2).

Body weight and height were taken with participants in bare feet and light clothing, and measured to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm, respectively. Body weight was measured using a portable digital scale and body height using a stadiometer.

Oral examination

  • Dental caries was recorded with tooth as the unit of measurement. The dental examination used international criteria standardized by the World Health Organization for oral health surveys [12]. The numbers of decayed (DT), filled (FT) and missing (MT) teeth were calculated. Dental caries diagnosis was based on visual-tactile criteria using a sterile mirror and a blunt dental probe. The examination was performed in a fully equipped dental clinic using plane mirror and sharp probe after the teeth had been dried with air. In this paper, the term “caries” includes caries with cavitation.

  • Periodontal and oral hygiene status were assessed using the Community Periodontal Index (CPI), the Calculus Surface Index (CSI), the Gingival Index (GI) and the Simplified Debris Index (SDI).

Anthropometric measurements and oral examination were conducted by one examiner after calibration. Intra-examiner reliability was assessed by re-examining 10 volunteers after one week (Cohen’s kappa coefficient = 0.92).

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Stata 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) software.

The data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variable with a normal distribution, and as median with interquartile range (IQR) for variables with skewed distribution. For categorical variables, data were presented as proportion.

To evaluate the association between untreated dental caries and recorded variables, a Poisson regression analysis was first applied to estimate the Prevalence ratio (PR) of untreated dental caries through levels of various explanatory factors. The high prevalence of dental caries in the study group meant that odds ratios were poor indicators of relative frequency, so prevalence ratios were determined using Poisson regression modelling [13]. Prevalence ratio (PR) and related 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated in both univariate and multivariate regression analysis. The multiple regression model included the variables with p < 0.25. The adjusted rate ratios were considered statistically significant when p-values were 0.05 or less. The dependent variable used was the number of untreated decayed teeth (DT). The severity of dental caries at tooth level was defined as the increased amount of untreated dental decay. This means that we evaluated each subject’s likelihood to have more or less dental decay according to studied factors.

Three BMI categories were first used for analysis. Underweight subjects were defined as BMI < 18.5, normal weight as BMI of 18.5–24.99, and overweight and obese as BMI ≥ 25. Overweight and obese were combined during regression analysis due to the low proportion of obese subjects when analysing BMI as a categorical variable.

To avoid potentially arbitrary categorization, restricted cubic splines evaluated the likelihood of dental decay in each subjects according to the factors evaluated [13, 14]. Non-linearity was tested using the likelihood ratio, comparing the model with only the linear term to the model with both linear and cubic spline terms. We specified three knot positions at the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles of BMI, that is, at BMI values of 17.75, 21.19 and 28.64, respectively. The reference level was set to the median value of BMI 23.23.

Poisson regression was used to compute prevalence ratios for the number of untreated dental caries, according to BMI. We controlled for age, income, frequency of tooth brushing, tooth brushing motion, age at beginning of tooth brushing, education level, simplified debris index, gingival index and reason for dental attendance.

Results

A total of 101 adults volunteered to participate in the present study. The main characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population

Variables

Values

Age (years)

27 ± 8

Female gender, n (%)

69 (68.31)

Income, n (%)

 Low

28 (27.73)

 Medium

32 (31.68)

 High

41 (40.59)

Frequency of tooth brushing, n (%)

 0 or 1/day

18 (17.83)

 2/day

49 (48.51)

 3/day

34 (33.66)

Tooth brushing motion, n (%)

 Appropriate

67 (66.34)

 Inappropriate

34 (32.66)

Reason of the dental attendance, n (%)

 Planned visit

26 (25.74)

 Acute visit

75 (74.26)

Education level, n (%)

 Non and primary

22 (21.78)

 Secondary

29 (28.72)

 University

50 (49.5)

BMI, n (%)

 

 Underweight

35 (34.65)

 Normalweight

37 (36.63)

 Overweight

22 (21.78)

 Obese

7 (6.93)

Age at beginning tooth brushing (years), (mean ± SD)

3 ± 1

DT, (mean ± SD)

5.37 ± 3.66

MT, [median (IQR)]

4 (2–5)

FT, [median (IQR)]

2 (0–6)

DMFT, [median (IQR)]

12 (9–16)

GI, (mean ± SD)

1.42 ± 0.77

CPI, (mean ± SD)

1.15 ± 0.40

SDI, (mean ± SD)

1.28 ± 0.77

CSI, [median (IQR)]

1.26 (0.83–1.66)

IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation, F female, BMI body mass index, FT number of filled teeth, MT number of missed teeth, DT number of decayed untreated teeth, DMFT number of decayed, missed and filled teeth, GI gingival index, CSI calculus surface index, DIS simplified Debris index, CPI community Periodontal index

The mean age of participants was 27 ± 8. Of the 101 participants, 69 (68.31%) were female. The BMI of 35 (34.65%) of subjects was below normal and the overall mean BMI was 22.31 ± 4.47.

The mean of teeth affected by dental caries was 5.37 ± 3.66, the median (IQR) of filled teeth was 2 (0–6).

Table 2 presents the results of Poisson regression analyses of the factors associated with the severity of dental caries at tooth level and the studied factors.
Table 2

Poisson regression analysis of the factors associated with the increased number of dental decay

 

DT mean ± SD

Univariate analysis

Mulivariate analysis

PR

95% CI

p

PR

95% CI

p

Age (/year)

 

1.007

0.99–1.01

0.13

0.98

0.97–1.00

0,05

Gender

 Male

5.4 ± 3.7

1.03

0.86–1.24

0.68

   

 Female

5.2 ± 3.4

1

     

Income

 Low

7.1 ± 3

1.65

1.30–2.07

<0.001

1.45

1.05–2.02

0.02

 Medium

5.4 ± 3.5

1.25

  

1.06

 

0.62

 High

4.3 ± 3.7

1

1.02–1.52

0.02

1

0.83–1.34

 

Frequency of tooth brushing

 0 or 1/day

6.8 ± 3. 3

1.54

1.20–1.97

0.001

1.006

0.74–1.35

0.97

 2/day

5.6 ± 3.6

1.34

1.06–1.58

0.009

1.03

0.83–1.28

0.74

 3/day

4.2 ± 3.6

1

  

1

  

Tooth brushing motion

 Appropriate

4.5 ± 3.5

0.65

0.54–0.77

<0.001

0.81

0.98–1.50

0.06

 Inappropriate

7 ± 3.4

1

  

1

  

 Age at beginning tooth brushing

 

1.16

1.08–1.24

<0.001

1.15

1.05–1.25

0.02

Education level

 Non and primary

6 ± 3.6

1.35

1.09–1.68

0.006

1.14

0.81–1.58

0.43

 Secondary

6.1 ± 3.4

1.49

 1.23–1.81

<0.001

1.37

 1.09–1.71

0.006

 University

4.4 ± 3.5

1

  

1

  

BMI

 Underweight

6.4 ± 3.9

1.58

1.29–1.94

<0.001

1.66

1.30–2.12

<0.001

 Normal weight

4.4 ± 3.5

1

  

1

  

 Overweight and obese

5.3 ± 3.2

1.28

1.02–1.60

0.02

1.30

1.03–1.65

0.02

SDI

1.1 ± 0.3

0.88

0.79–0.99

0.03

0.61

0.50–0.75

<0.001

CSI*

0.5 (0.16–1.16)

0.94

0.84–1.07

0.40

   

GI

 

1.19

1.06–1.33

0.002

1.59

1.30–1.94

<0.001

Reason of the dental attendance

 Planned visit

4.1 ± 3.3

0.73

0.54–0.90

0.004

0.94

0.74–1.18

0.62

 Acute visit

5.7 ± 3.7

1

  

1

  

* Median (interquartile range)

SD standard deviation, F female, M Male, BMI body mass index, DT number of decayed untreated teeth, GI gingival index, CIS calculus surface index, SDI simplified Debris index, PR prevalence ratio, 1 reference category

In univariate analysis, it was found that low and medium educational level (PR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.09–1.68; 1.49, 1.23–1.81 respectively), low and medium income (PR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.30–2.07; 1.25 95% CI 1.02–1.52), gingival index (GI) (PR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.06–1.33), age at beginning tooth brushing (PR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.08–1.24), underweight (PR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.29–1.94), overweight and obesity (1.28, 95% CI 1.02–1.60) frequency of tooth brushing (0 or 1/day and 2/day) were risk factors associated with the increased rate of untreated dental caries. At the same time, an appropriate motion of brush (PR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.54–0.77) and planned visit (PR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.54–0.94) were protective factors.

Adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that only age at beginning tooth brushing (PR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.25), BMI < normal (PR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.30–2.12), BMI > normal (PR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.65), SDI (PR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.75) and GI (PR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.30–1.94) remained associated with the increase of the number of dental caries.

Figure 1 shows the adjusted rate ratios and confidence interval over the BMI values.
Fig. 1

Relationship curves for association between the numbers of decayed untreated teeth and body mass index (BMI) on a continuous basis. Adjusted Prevalence Ratios are indicated by a solid line and 95% confidence intervals by gray color derived from restricted cubic spline with 3 knots

A significant quadratic effect between categorical BMI and the rate of untreated dental decay (the p values for non-linearity was <0.001 and for the overall effect p < 0.001) was observed.

This means that the number of untreated dental decay is a positive quadratic trend in the association with BMI values. So these data suggest a U-shaped trend in the association between untreated dental caries and BMI.

Discussion

The present study indicated that adults with both low and high BMI have poorer dental health as manifested by more untreated caries compared with normal weight patients. This association was observed in both univariate and multivariate analyses and shown U-shaped distribution.

The association between unhealthy lifestyle and chronic disease continues to be a greater focus in public health because it is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality [15, 16].

Data from several population-based studies regarding the association between dental caries and BMI are conflicting. Patterns of previous reported relationships included no association [10] between BMI and dental caries, a positive association [17] and an inverse relationship [9, 18].

It should be stated that a majority of studies reporting positive association explored the association between obesity and dental caries [17, 19]. Most studies focus on linear (positive–negative) association.

Some studies suggest that dental caries is associated with both high and low body mass index [20, 21]. The present finding of a U-shaped association of BMI with dental caries suggest that this pattern of association is plausible.

We propose that association between BMI and dental caries may be explained thorough common explanatory factors. Unhealthy diets with frequent consumption of refined sugars and added sugars and low in fruit and vegetables may increase the level of both BMI [21] and dental caries. On the other hand, decreased food intake may be attributable to a high level of untreated dental caries and then explain frequency of untreated dental caries [9] among low-BMI adults.

BMI shares eating behaviours and social etiological factors with dental caries. Socio-economic factors are also indicators of individual behaviour regarding the types of food intake and may influence the dietary preference [22, 23].

Therefore, eating behaviours may mediate the link between BMI and dental health. Individuals with high risk should be encouraged to undertake lifestyle modifications and improvements in a dental health status diet.

An established relationship has been reported between brushing behaviour, educational level and the rate of dental caries. Findings of the present study corroborate these results [24].

Our results should be interpreted in light of both the study’s strengths and its limitations. High levels of dental decay were detected in the present study, which indicated a high-risk study population. Nonetheless, the associations detected may be generalizable to other study populations even if geographical inequalities in dental caries experience were reported [2, 24].

Unhealthy dietary patterns are prevalent among high-income countries and have emerged as public health conditions among low- and middle-income countries.

Such studies may then be crucial for estimating whether reductions in the prevalence of dental caries among specific groups may affect some populations’ morbidities like high and low BMI. Moreover, demand for better health systems throughout the world should integrate the possible co-existence of some pathologic conditions for common preventive measures.

Another limitation is the study design, which did not allow for assessment of temporality of associations. However, to our knowledge, this is the first study exploring the non-linear association between untreated dental caries and BMI as a categorical variable.

Future studies should explore more potential factors associated with unmet dental needs (dental insurance, barriers to access, psychological factors, etc.). In addition, dietary habits (composition and intake frequency) need to be considered.

In conclusion, a U-shaped trend in the association between dental decay and BMI was found. This means that an increased rate of untreated tooth decay was associated with both under- and overweight.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

body mass index

PR: 

Prevalence ratios

SD: 

standard deviation

CI: 

confidence interval

Kg: 

kilograms

m: 

meter

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SC was involved in the study design, prepared the data, performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. FA was involved in the design of the study and coordination. RA participated in the design of the study, advised on the statistical analyses, the interpretation of the analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. ME contributed to the preparation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all those who participated in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon request from the first and third authors.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was performed in accordance with ethics principles. Informed consent was gained from the participants. Informed written consent was taken from study participants before enrollment. The proposal was approved by the regional ethics committee of Biomedical Research, University Mohammed V Rabat. Analysis was conducted on anonymized data.

Funding

This study was funded by the research program supported by Mohammed V University Rabat, Morocco.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Team on Oral Ecosystem, Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Laboratory of Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Mohammed V University in Rabat
(2)
Laboratory of Clinical and Epidemiological Research. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University in Rabat
(3)
Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital

References

  1. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369:51–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ravaghi V, Quiñorez C, Allison PJ. Comparing inequalities in oral and general health: findings of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Can J Public Health. 2013;104:e466–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tellez M, Sohn W, Burt BA, Ismail AI. Assessment of the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and dental caries severity among low-income, African–Americans: a multilevel approach. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66:30–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Stewart R, Hirani V. Dental health and cognitive impairment in an English national survey population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;9:1410–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Srinivasulu G, Fareed N, Sudhir KM, KrishnaKumar RV. Relationship between stimulated salivary factors, dental caries status and nutritional condition among institutionalized elderly people. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13:49–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shimazaki Y, Soh I, Saito T, Yamashita Y, Koga T, Miyazaki H, Takehara T. Influence of dentition status on physical disability, mental impairment, and mortality in institutionalized elderly people. J Dent Res. 2001;80:340–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Willershausen B, Hass G, Krummenauer F, Hohenfellnet K. Relationship between high weight and caries frequency in German elementary school children. Eur J Med Res. 2004;31:400–4.Google Scholar
  8. Vania A, Pariselle V, Capasso F, Di Tanna GL, Vestri A, Ferrari M, Polimeni A. Early childhood caries underweight or overweight, that is the question. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2011;12:231–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Benzian H, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Hobdell M, Mulder J, Van Palenstein Heldermann W. Untreated severe dental decay: a neglected determinant of low Body Mass Index in 12 year old Filipino children. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:558.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Moreira PVL, Rosenblatt A, Severo AMR. Prevalence of dental caries in obese and normal weight Brazilian adolescents attending state and private schools. Community Dent Health. 2006;23:251–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei Z. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med. 2006;25:127–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med. 1989;8:551–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sauvaget C, Ramadas K, Thomas G, Vinoda J, Thara S, Sankaranarayanan R. Body mass index, weight change and mortality risk in a prospective study in India. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:990–1004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davey Smith G, Sterne JA, Fraser A, Tynelius P, Lawlor DA, Rasmussen F. The association between BMI and mortality using offspring BMI as an indicator of own BMI: large intergenerational mortality study. BMJ. 2009;339:b5043.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayden C, Bowler JO, Chambers S, Freeman R, Humphris G, Richards D, Cecil JE. Obesity and dental caries in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:289–308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hildebrandt GH, Dominguez BL, Schork MA, Loesche WJ. Functional units, chewing, swallowing, and food avoidance among the elderly. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:588–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez Munoz M, Adobes Martin M, Gonzalez de Dios J. Systematic review about dental caries in children and adolescents with obesity and/or overweight. Nutr Hops. 2013;28:1372–83.Google Scholar
  20. Hooley M, Skouteris H, Boganin C, Satur J, Kilpatrick N. Body mass index and dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review of literature published 2004 to 2011. Syst Rev. 2012;21:57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharna A, Hedge AM. Relationship between body mass index, caries experience and dietary preferences in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009;34:49–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cinar AB, Murtomaa H. Clustering of obesity and dental health with lifestyle factors among Turkish and Finnish pre-adolesents. Obes Facts. 2008;1:196–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socio-economic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990–2005. Obesity. 2008;6:275–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Marmot M, Bell R. Social determinants and dental health. Adv Dent Res. 2011;23:206–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement