The overall rarity of reported URCD cases and the diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas that arise in situations of atypical clinical presentations and similarities to other renal pathologies such as MCDK as observed in this case, make this review particularly relevant. The clinical picture of URCD in this patient was confounded by the additional characteristic atretic pelvicalyceal system observed in MCDK, warranting the use of histopathology to ascertain diagnosis.
URCD is a renal pathology wherein there is a unilateral replacement of the renal parenchyma by several cysts but with no association to other genetic cystic diseases. The pathogenesis of URCD is still not clearly understood, but it has been hypothesized that URCD arises from a developmental anomaly similar to that observed in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease with which it shares remarkable pathological similarity [9]. Despite the few cases of URCD observed in children and neonates, this renal pathology has been predominantly reported in adulthood [4]. MCDK, with a well-documented pathogenesis on the other hand, is a form of renal dysplasia wherein there are multiple cysts studded on the dysplastic renal parenchyma. MCDK results from an abnormal metanephric differentiation often on a background of an obstructive uropathy [2]. This probably explains its frequent early detection, pre-natally or in infancy [2, 4] and its male preponderance [10]. However, the late clinical presentation in this case was not sufficient to rule out MCDK which has also been diagnosed in adulthood in some instances [2, 4]. The absence of a family history of renal disease or deaths due to a renal condition in this case is consistent with both renal pathologies which are non-hereditary [10, 11]. Nevertheless, cases of MCDK inheritance though few have earlier been discussed [4, 8]. With progression to adulthood, MCDK is usually asymptomatic as opposed to URCD which usually presents with flank or abdominal pain, a palpable abdominal mass, hematuria and exclusive unilateral involvement of the kidney. This patient, with no relevant past medical history, presented with severe debilitating abdominal pain, intermittent fever, some urinary symptoms and a right iliac fossa mass. Both disorders can also present with hypertension [2, 4] which was, however, not present in this patient. The asymptomatic presentation of MCDK later in life could be due to the spontaneous partial or complete involution of the kidney [2, 12] due to the resorption of the fluid in the cysts [2, 3]. It is suggested that this cyst involution occurs alongside that of the renal parenchyma making the affected kidney undetectable in half of MCDK cases above 5 years of age [13]. In addition to being mainly asymptomatic, MCDK is almost always unilateral when detected in adulthood since the bilateral presentation, though more common, is generally fatal in infancy [2]. This unilateral presentation is often associated with several extra-renal anomalies in other organs and body systems [2], including contralateral renal abnormalities in more than a quarter of the cases [3]. No intra-abdominal organ or contralateral renal anomaly was detected on abdominal ultrasound in this patient making a diagnosis of MCDK further unlikely.
A closer look at the macroscopic renal morphology shows that URCD consists of multiple cysts of varying sizes diffusely studded on the renal medulla and cortex with a functional calyceal system, in contrast to the cysts in MCDK which are generally fewer and predominantly cortical in distribution [4, 10]. However, the URCD and MCDK overlap in presentation in this case is further accentuated by the complete absence of the contrast material in the right ureter on intravenous urography, suggestive of an obstructed or atretic right pelvicalyceal system or ureter. This distinguishing feature has rather been documented in MCDK, in which there is usually an under-developed or absent pelvicalyceal system, ureters or renal vessels. This developmental anomaly could extend to the lower moiety of the renal tree with consequent ureteropelvic atresia in more extreme situations [2, 4]. In addition to this, an earlier report suggests that MCDK cases with renal pelvis atresia are unlikely to present with contralateral urinary abnormalities [14], implying the contralateral renal sparing which is typical of URCD [15] and which was observed in this patient is less helpful in posing a definitive diagnosis. Nevertheless, the expected compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral kidney in MCDK [16] was, however, not seen in this patient. The overlap in clinical presentation and macroscopic renal features in this patient brings up diagnostic dilemmas imposing histopathology as a mandatory investigation to differentiate between these two entities. The cystic dilations interspersed by renal parenchyma as found on histopathology of the resected kidney were more suggestive of a URCD rather than of a renal dysplasia. We did not perform a voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) of the contralateral kidney to check for any vesicoureteral reflux to further rule out MCDK since the benefits of this invasive procedure are yet to be proven [2]. Moreover, neither hydroureter nor hydronephrosis (both pointers towards a reflux nephropathy) were observed on abdominal ultrasound.
Possible complications of URCD such as cysts rupture or infection, as was probably the case in this patient, have been reported [17]. The presence of intractable severe debilitating pain on a background of intermittent fever both suggestive of a probable complication, together with the non-functional nature of the kidney therefore mandated nephrectomy. The importance of a correct diagnosis in this situation cannot be over-emphasized since the conservative management often recommended in MCDK [12] does not always apply to polycystic kidney diseases such as URCD, for which surgical nephrectomy becomes a management option in situations of failed conservative management such as cyst decortication and non-responsiveness to analgesics [18]. Mindful of the normal renal function test results on admission, it is worth mentioning that URCD typically does not progress to end stage renal failure. However, patient follow-up remains important to ascertain normal renal function over the years and prompt treatment of any pathologies that could ultimately compromise the optimal functioning of the remaining kidney.
