Open Access

Molecular and epidemiological characterization of HIV-1 subtypes among Libyan patients

  • Mohamed A. Daw1, 5, 6Email author,
  • Abdallah El-Bouzedi2,
  • Mohamed O. Ahmed3,
  • Aghnyia A. Dau4 and
  • In association with the Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV
BMC Research Notes201710:170

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2491-2

Received: 9 September 2015

Accepted: 24 April 2017

Published: 28 April 2017

Abstract

Background

The epidemiological and clinical aspects of human immunodeficiency virus subtypes are of great interest worldwide. These subtypes are rarely studied in North African countries. Libya is a large country with the longest coast on the Mediterranean Sea, facing the Southern European countries. Studies on the characterization of HIV-1 subtypes are limited in Libya. This study aimed to determine the magnitude of the HIV problem among the Libyan population and to better understand the genetic diversity and the epidemiologic dynamics of HIV 1, as well as to correlate that with the risk factors involved.

Methods

A total of 159 HIV-1 strains were collected from 814 HIV positive patients from the four Libyan regions during a 16-year period (1995–2010). To determine the HIV-1 subtypes, genetic analysis and molecular sequencing were carried out using provirus polygene. Epidemiologic and demographic information was obtained from each participant and correlated with HIV-1 subtypes using logistic regression.

Results

The overall prevalence of HIV among Libyans ranged from 5 to 10 per 100,000 during the study period. It was higher among intravenous drug users (IVDUs) (53.9%), blood recipients (25.9%) and heterosexuals (17.6%) than by vertical transmission (2.6%). Prevalence was higher among males aged 20–40 years (M:F 1:6, P > 0.001). Among the 159 strains of HIV-1 available for typing, 117 strains (73.6%) were subtype B, 29 (18.2%) were CRF02_AG, and 13 (8.2%) were subtype A. HIV-1 subtype B was the most prevalent all over the country, and it was more prevalent in the Northern region, particularly among IVDUs (P < 0.001). GRF02_AG was common in the Eastern region, particularly among blood recipients while subtype A emerged in the Western region, particularly among IVDUs.

Conclusions

HIV-1 infection is emerging in Libya with a shifting prevalence of subtypes associated with the changing epidemiology of HIV-1 among risk groups. A genetic analysis of HIV-1 strains demonstrated low subtype heterogeneity with the evolution of subtype B, and CRF_20 AG, as well as HIV-1 subtype A. Our study highlights the importance of expanded surveillance programs to control HIV infection and the necessity of introducing public health strategies to target the risk groups, particularly IVDUs.

Keywords

HIV-1 subtypes Libya Genetic diversity Molecular epidemiology AIDS BG-S-Benghazi–Bulgarian Strains

Background

The emergence of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) among human populations has been traced back to between the 1900s and early 1920s, but it was not until 1983 that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was identified as its cause. HIV belongs to the Retroviridae family, the Lentivirus genus. This genus comprises both types of HIV (HIV-1 and HIV-2), in addition to many simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIV) that naturally infect different primate species in Africa [1, 2]. HIV types have distinct patterns of spread and progression to AIDS. HIV-2 infection is mainly restricted to regions of Western and Central Africa and account for only 1.4% of HIV isolates [3]. HIV-1, which is responsible for the AIDS pandemic, has been divided into four groups (M, N, O and P), each of which is derived from a distinct introduction of simian immunodeficiency viruses that naturally infect chimpanzees (SIVcpz). HIV-1 group M (Major) alone is responsible for more than 95% of the AIDS pandemic, and virtually all studies on HIV have been conducted with representatives of this group [4, 5].

The epidemiological and clinical features of HIV infection have changed considerably in recent years. This is clearly mirrored by changing in the modes of transmission and evident drop in related morbidity and mortality [6, 7]. The trajectory of the AIDS epidemic has been broken in most regions, and sustainable solutions are implemented worldwide. However, despite all the progress, the AIDS epidemic is far from over, particularly in developing countries [8]. In those countries, which are rampant with inequalities, political instability, and discriminatory regulations, fragile communities affected by HIV and AIDS are found everywhere [9, 10]. Therefore, studies are needed to highlight the ever-changing epidemiology of HIV among the infected populations in such countries.

The global epidemiology of HIV-1 subtypes is very heterogeneous and varies greatly worldwide, even within regions of the same continent [11, 12]. During 2004–2007, subtype C accounted for nearly half (48%) of all global infections [4, 13]. It is considered endemic in sub-Saharan and Eastern Africa (where over two-thirds of infected individuals reside) followed by the Indian Pacific and southern region of Brazil. HIV-1 subtype A1 is more prevalent in Central Africa, Iran, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, as it accounts for 12% of the total subtypes. Subtypes A2 and A3 are found primarily in Africa. Subtype B is the most disseminated variant. It accounts for 11% and found mainly in the European Union, USA, Australia, North Africa and Japan [14, 15]. CRF02_AG accounts for 8% and CRF01_AE for 5%, and they occur mainly in Western Africa and Southeast Asia [2, 16]. Other CRFs and URFs are responsible for 4% of global infections, bringing the combined total of worldwide CRFs to 16% and all recombinants (CRFs plus URFs) to 20% [17]. Other subtypes, such as subtype G and D, account for 5 and 2%, respectively, while subtypes F, H, J and K together cause fewer than 1% of HIV infections worldwide [18, 19].

The HIV epidemic in North African countries is growing faster nowadays due to political instability, which resulted in massive population displacements and lack of migration control [20, 21]. Most transmission within these countries occurs among intravenous drug users (IVDUs) and in some health-care settings [22, 23]. Few studies have been reported on the genetic variability of HIV-1 in these countries. In Libya, epidemiological data on the HIV-1 epidemic is lacking [24, 25]. The geographic location of the country, with the longest coast in the Mediterranean basin facing the Southern European countries, and its oil producer status make it an important destination for Sub-Saharan immigrants [26, 27]. Hence, studying the HIV-1 subtypes in Libya should be a priority. The objectives of this study were to perform a comprehensive molecular epidemiological survey of HIV-1 diversity in Libya and to investigate the prevalence of viral variants circulating among different risk groups to better characterize the HIV-1 epidemic.

Methods

Study population

A total of 814 persons diagnosed with HIV-1 infection in Libya were studied over a 16-year period from 1995 to 2010 (Table 1). Convenience specimens were collected from different vulnerable populations, including blood and blood product recipients, IVDUs, offspring of infected mothers, and persons with promiscuous sexual contacts (Table 1). Venous blood samples were taken by qualified nurses and immediately tested for HIV by laboratory technicians who applied a three-serial rapid testing strategy using determine HIV-1/2 Kit (Inverness Medical Innovations) for initial testing, and subsequently Uni-Gold HIV-Kit (Trinity Biotech) and Bioline HIV-1/2-Kit (Standard Diagnostics) for confirmation of reactive results [29], The sera samples were collected from each of the four regions according to the Libyan Ministry of Housing & Planning, as recently described by Daw et al. [28]. Of the 814 infected samples, only 159 samples (19.5%) were found suitable for genotyping and subtype specification. Of these, 35 (22%) were from the Eastern Region, 42 (26.4%) from the Western Region, 59 (37.1%) from the Northern Region, and 23 (14.5%) from the Southern Region. Demographics and relevant clinical data were taken from the questionnaire database and cross-referenced with the patients’ medical files, as previously described [28].
Table 1

Distribution by age, gender, route of infection and year of diagnosis of HIV-1 seropositive patients in Libya

Demographic characteristics

Registered patientsa

Ratiob

Studied

Total

Age (years)

 <20

49

119

1:2

 20–40

87

623

1:7

 >40

23

72

1:3

Gender

 Male

132

745

6:5

 Female

27

69

1:3

Transmission route

 Blood or blood products

61

211

1:4

 Sexual contact

17

143

1:9

 IVDU

72

439

1:7

 Vertical transmission

9

21

5:3

Screening period

 1995–2000

48

311

1:7

 2001–2005

52

217

5:4

 2006–2010

59

286

1:5

 Total

159

814

1:5

aOfficially registered and coded cases of HIV in Libya (1995–2010)

bRatio (Studied: Registered)

Genetic analysis

The HIV-1 genotyping and genetic analysis was carried out using partial PCR amplification was performed on a convenience sample of 159 collected from different patients all over Libyan regions. A multiple alignment of the newly derived protease/RT sequences and full-length genome sequences with selected reference sequences was constructed and the origin of the subtypes were traced and analysed as previously described [30]. Phylogenetic trees were generated, and the consistency of branching order was evaluated using Phylogeny Inference Package V3.5c. Recombinant analysis used Simplot, version 3.4,20 and alignment examination determined precise breakpoints. After breakpoint identification, each segment was extracted and analyzed phylogenetically to confirm the assignment of the subtype. Serologic test results were linked to the questionnaire only by a unique numeric code to preserve confidentiality and anonymity of the study participants [31].

Statistical analysis

The data were coded and entered in an Excel sheet. The database was cleaned and verified. The data were analyzed by using Microsoft Excel 2007, and statistical tests were done using Minitab version 15 and SPSS version 16. A Chi square test was used to determine the difference in risk factors between seropositive and sero-negative viral status. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in univariate analysis were calculated using seronegative persons as reference. Multiple logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis to determine the independent risk factors for exclusively all HIV-1 subtypes involved.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Libyan National Ethical Committee (Approval No. LY NS, AIDS-HIV-310153). It was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration [32] and under the supervision of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya. Clinical and epidemiological data were maintained only for therapeutic and research purposes. All participants signed an informed consent form witnessed by the local health officer before collection of data and blood samples. The questionnaire used to collect demographic and epidemiological data was anonymous and linked to the blood sample tube only by a code. This study was conducted in collaboration with both the Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV and the Libyan Society of Hospital Infection (LSHI). Both organizations have a strong human rights focus as well as extensive involvement in hepatitis and AIDS prevention activities in the region and consequently have managed to establish strong collaborative links with government, public institutions, and civil society.

Results

A total of 814 HIV-seropositive cases from all the four regions of the country were followed. Of these, 745 (91.5%) were males (M:F ration 10.8:1). The largest number of infections were attributed to IVDUs (439, 53.9%) followed by those who had received blood or blood products (211, 25.9%), sexual contact (143, 17.6%) and mother-to-child transmission (21, 2.6%). The prevalence was significantly higher among males (M:F ratio 1:6, P < 0.001) and among those aged 20–40 years. It was lower among those <20 years old and those >40 years old (P > 0.01). The prevalence of HIV-1 among the studied population changed over the study period by a ratio (R) of 1:1.5 (1995‒2000 vs. 2005‒2010).

The trends in the prevalence of HIV infections among major risk groups during 1995‒2010 are shown in Fig. 1. During the early part of the study, HIV-1 prevalence was high among persons receiving blood or blood products and via vertical transmission (P < 0.001). These prevalence rates declined considerably by the end of the study period, possibly due to strict adherence to the universal obligatory blood screening program introduced in Libya in the early 1980s. On the other hand, the frequency of infected IVDUs increased significantly during the study period, from 2.5% during 1995‒2000 to 26.4% in 2005‒2010 (1:10.5). There was a slight increase in the frequency of those who contracted HIV via sexual behavior from 2.5 to 5.7% (R 1:2.3). The decline among those receiving blood products was considerable, from 21.4 to 0.5% (R: 4.3:1).
Fig. 1

Prevalence of HIV-1 subtypes among risk groups in Libya 1995–2010

Neighbor-joining trees of the HIV sequences of the 159 available samples and reference sequences of HIV-1 group M (subtypes A, B, C, D, G, and CRF02_ A/G) revealed three distinct subtypes, including subtype A, subtype B and CRF02_AG. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built using the sequence analysis of 159 strains collected from all regions of Libya with reference samples are those named preceded by the HIV-1 subtype.
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree built using the sequence analysis of 159 strains collected from all regions of Libya. Subtype B (orange), subtype A (red), and CRF02_AG (yellow). Reference samples are those named, preceded by the subtype

Subtype B was the most frequent subtype, accounting for 73.5% of the samples, followed by CRF02_AG (18.3%). Subtype A accounted for 8.2%. According to patient retrieval data, all persons involved in this study were presumed to have been infected in Libya. The prevalence of the reported subtypes varied greatly over the study period as shown in Fig. 3. There were 16 CRF02_AG strains (10.1%) in 2000 but only five (3.1%) in 2010, whereas subtype B represented 16.4% in 2000 and reached 32.7% in 2010. However, the prevalence of a few strains of subtype A did not change significantly during the study period.
Fig. 3

Distribution of HIV 1 subtypes among Libyan patients 1995–2010

The association of HIV-1 subtypes with demographic and risk factors were analyzed. These included age, gender, mode of transmission, and time of diagnosis as shown in Table 2. HIV-1 CRF02_AG was most frequent among those who received blood or blood products, and among those <20 years old, followed by those who were infected by vertical transmission. Subtype B was more frequent among IVDUs, followed by those with promiscuous sexual contact predominantly among the sexually active group (20‒40 years). A few strains of subtype A were identified, mainly among IVDUs aged 20‒40 years. The proportions of younger persons infected with CRF02_AG declined significantly over the study period, whereas subtype B increased (P < 0.001), particularly among IVDUs and those practicing sexual behavior. There was a significant spike in the relative prevalence of subtype B during 2006–2010, while CRF02_AG declined (OR 4.1; P < 0.001). Table 3 shows the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes by region of residence. During 1995‒2000, 11 (57.9%) strains of CRF02_AG were isolated from the Eastern region, 5 (26.3%) strains from the South, 2 (10.5%) from the North, and only 1 (5.3%) from the West. Subtype B was predominant in the North (11; 47.8%) and West (7; 30.4%), and only a few strains were isolated from the East (3; 13%) and South (2; 8.7%). Only two strains of subtype A were emerging in the Western region. Between 2001 and 2010, the contribution of subtype B increased up to three folds in most of the regions. This was paralleled by a reduction of subtype CRF02_AG, particularly in the Eastern region, where it was the main subtype during 1995‒2000. However, a few strains of subtype A were emerging in the West and South. The location of the various genotypes was plotted on a map of Libya to examine the trends in their geographic distribution as illustrated in Fig. 4. The arrows on the map indicate the plausible route through which these strains may have entered Libya, including the Benghazi‒Bulgarian strains (BG-S). Most infections and the greatest heterogeneity was observed all over the country, but they particularly more heterogeneous in the Northern region, where the capital Tripoli is located, followed by the three other regions. The most common B subtypes showed the widest distribution across the country. Most CRF02_AG cases were located in and around Benghazi in the Eastern region of Libya.
Table 2

Association between infection with different HIV-1 subtypes and certain influencing variables among the Libyan population

 

CRF02_AG

Subtype B

Subtype A

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Age group (years)

 <20

2.3

1.34

2.62

0.60

0.35

0.95

0.0

0.0

0.0

 21–40

0.20

0.09

0.24

2.89

1.95

3.95

0.70

0.43

1.02

 >40

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.91

2.21

3.9

0.59

0.39

0.91

Sex

 M vs. F

0.75

0.63

0.89

1.71

1.68

1.98

1.62

1.46

1.79

Risk factors

 Blood transfusion

1.22

1.12

1.87

0.3

0.12

0.34

0

0

0

 IVDU

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.31

2.15

17.15

5.65

1.75

17.06

 Sexual contact

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.21

1.05

1.43

0

0

0

 Vertical transmission

0.9

0.8

1.90

0

0

0

0

0

0

Screening period

 1995–2000

1.06

0.8

2.4

1.9

0.6

3.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

 2001–2005

0.02

0.01

1.02

2.7

1.2

5.6

0.01

0.01

0.01

 2006–2010

0.01

0.0

0.42

4.1

2.2

6.8

0.01

0.01

0.04

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, M males, F females, IVDU intravenous drug use

Table 3

Distribution of HIV-1 subtypes by regions of residence among Libyans infected with HIV 1995‒2010

Region

1995–2000

2001–2005

2006–2010

HIV 1 subtypes

CRF02_AG

A

B

CRF02_AG

A

B

CRF02_AG

A

B

East

11

0

3

3

0

5

2

0

11

West

1

2

7

1

2

10

0

3

16

North

2

0

11

1

2

17

0

1

25

South

5

0

2

2

0

3

1

3

7

Total

19

2

23

7

4

35

3

7

59

Fig. 4

Map of Libya shows the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes among the Libyan regions. The arrows indicate the plausible route of HIV-1 subtypes entry into Libya, including BG-S (Benghazi‒Bulgarian Strain)

Discussion

Despite the overwhelming progress in understanding the global epidemiology of HIV, few accurate data are available on the prevalence of HIV-1 infection in North African countries. Studies in this region have been hampered by fears of stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV/AIDS [33]. In Libya, a few studies were carried out on the prevalence of co-infection with HIV and hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus, but no study has focused on the magnitude of the HIV problem in the Libyan population [29]. Consequently, we performed a comprehensive cohort study over a 16-year period of individuals newly diagnosed with HIV-1 from all geographical regions of Libya. The overall prevalence of HIV-1 in our study ranged from 5 to 10 per 100,000 according to the cases registered in Libya. Furthermore, the prevalence varied from one risk group to another. It was highest among IVDUs, followed by blood recipients, and to a lower extent people with promiscuous sexual behavior. In our study, the number of people infected via IVDU increased steadily from the late 2000 and doubled by the end of 2010. Most cases newly infected with HIV were among IVDUs, only 10% were attributable to heterosexual exposure, and rarely to other risk factors. This is in agreement with other studies conducted in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. There is documented evidence of concentrated epidemics of HIV among IVDUs in Egypt, Morocco and Algeria, and suggestive evidence of epidemics among heterosexuals in Sudan and Egypt [34, 35]. However, most infections in these countries seem to be concentrated in high risk groups and there is no evidence of a sustainable general population epidemic. Therefore, large-scale cross-sectional studies are needed to verify that assumption, with further validity assessments for extrapolations in these countries [36, 37].

Molecular analysis of HIV-1 subtypes among Libyan patients showed three distinct subtypes. Subtype B was the most prevalent genotype, representing over 70% of HIV-1 infections in Libya, followed by CRF02_AG (18.3%) and subtype A (8.2%). This is in an agreement with other studies from neighboring Northern African countries. In Egypt, subtype B was the commonest strain, accounting for 91.7% of cases, followed by O (4.2%) and CRF01_AE (4.2%) [38]. In Tunisia, subtype B accounted for 95.8% and CRF02_AG for 4.2% [39]. Similarly, in Morocco HIV 1-subtype B accounted 93.5%, subtype A for 1%, and subtype F for 0.5% [40]. In Algeria, subtype B accounted for 56.3%, followed by CRF02_AG (18.0%), along with other contributing strains (CRF06_cpx 17.2, G 2.7, 206 2.7, D 1.3, and others 1.9% [41]. CRF02_AG and subtype A strains were also common in Sub-Saharan and West and Central Africa. However, the CRF02_AG strains found in our study were monophyletic, with low genetic diversity, and so are likely descended from a common ancestor [42, 43]. Similar results were reported from European countries in the Mediterranean basin, particularly Italy, Spain and Greece, with local expansion in certain populations, particularly IVDUs and heterosexuals [44, 45].

The reasons for the expansion and spread of HIV-1 subtypes in Libyan regions are not clear, and it is difficult to trace the possible evolutionary history of the Libyan subtypes. Among the speculative factors are immigration, scandals and population integration within sub-Saharan and North African countries [36, 46]. The substantial and continuous increase in subtype B strain among Libyans observed in this study could be attributed to the large number of legal and illegal workers who come to Libya from Egypt and neighboring Maghreb countries, where this strain is dominant [28, 29]. In the Eastern region of Libya in 1998, a unique circulating form was suddenly identified among 400 children with no known previous exposure or risk factors who had been treated at Benghazi Pediatric Hospital in Benghazi [25]. There is an evident speculation that this was caused by an unannounced testing of an attenuated vaccine strain by foreign medical staff, similar to vaccine trials early last century, in which children from developing countries were used [4749]. In any case, HIV 1 subtypes distribution in Libya shows limited diversity, and further epidemiological studies are needed to clarify the overlapping chains of transmission across North African countries.

The prevalence of HIV 1 subtypes among risk groups varies greatly from one part of the world to another. In Europe and North America, subtype B was found to be endemic among IVDUs, but in Cambodia and Vietnam subtype E was the most common [50, 51]. In our study, the initial epidemic among IVDUs was largely due to subtype B, whereas subtype CRF_02 AG was more prevalent among blood product recipients and a those infected by vertical transmission. Subtype A emerged among all risk groups, particularly those prone to promiscuous sexual contacts. This is in agreement with other studies from Africa, USA and EU on subtype B, though CRF_20AG and subtype A were common among Sub Saharan African countries [49, 52].

On the population level, none of our patients had multiple infections with HIV-1 subtypes. This observation of low inter-patient diversity has also been reported in epidemics of HIV-1 subtypes in the former Soviet Union and Ukraine [53]. Furthermore, differences in pathogenicity among HIV-1 genetic subtypes were not noted in the current study. However, Zhang et al. [54] reported higher initial viral loads, with similar CD4 cell counts in patients with subtype CRF_01AE and patients with subtype B. Thus, further studies are needed to evaluate antiretroviral therapy of HIV-infected patients in Libya.

Despite the dominance of subtype B in the Libyan population, the prevalence of subtypes is both periodically and geographically variable. CRF_02 AG, which was associated mainly with blood products, was more prevalent at the start of the study (1995) but was rarely reported by the end of the study (2010). This subtype was dominant mainly in the Eastern region of the country, where it accounted for over 45% of HIV-1 infection followed by the Southern region (17%), but it was rarely reported in the other regions (<8%). This was not the case for subtype B, the prevalence of which rose significantly throughout the study period, particularly among IVDUs and all over the Libyan regions, but particularly in West and South regions. Subtype A first appeared in 2005 and its prevalence increased, particularly in the Western and Northern regions.

It has been suggested that mobile populations play a special role in HIV-1 epidemics, particularly in developing countries. HIV-1 prevalence in communities located on commercial transport routes in Africa was found to be higher than that in communities elsewhere in the same region [55]. Libya is considered a major transit area of migration from Sub-Saharan Africa towards Western Europe for people seeking better living conditions. Subtype CRF02_AG and subtype A has been found to be endemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. Epidemiological studies have shown that HIV-1 Subtype A and CRF02_AG represent approximately 27% of HIV-1 infections worldwide, most of which are in Sub-Saharan Africa; CRF02_AG alone represents 50–70% of HIV-1 infections in this region. Thus, it could be easily introduced into Libya by immigrants. Although these indicators cause concern, no systematic information is available on the extent of the HIV-1 epidemic among African immigrants and on its behavioral determinants [56]. Such information is necessary to develop data-driven prevention programs.

The presented data give clear insights into the epidemiology HIV-1 among Libyans, which has hardly been explored in previous studies [29, 47]. However, the main limitation in our study is that it was carried out on registered HIV patients and so it may not mirror the exact picture of HIV in the country, as many HIV infected individuals may not get registered in the HIV national registry. Thus, speculation could be raised about the possibility that the overall prevalence masks an ongoing dynamic of HIV-1 among Libyan populations. Therefore, the trends need to be verified through a national surveillance program for a longer time, and further studies are needed to highlight the challenges that have to be met in order to reduce the disease burden in Libya [28, 57].

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MD designed the study, extracted the data, and drafted and finalized the manuscript. AE, MA & AD analyzed the data and contributed to the drafting of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to the Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV and the National AIDS & HIV clinics for their advice and help in this study. Special thanks should go to Dr. Amin Bredan at www.theeditor.be for his professional correction and editing the Manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are freely available upon request.

Consent to publish

We confirm that the data are freely available and can be published according to BMC regulations without needing consent.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Libyan National Ethical Committee and written informed consent was taken from all participants.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli
(2)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Tripoli
(3)
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Tripoli
(4)
Department of Surgery, Tripoli Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli
(5)
(6)
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli

References

  1. Peeters M, D’Arc M, Delaporte E. Origin and diversity of human retroviruses. AIDS Rev. 2014;16:23–34.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Lihana RW, Ssemwanga D, Abimiku A, Ndembi N. Update on HIV-1 diversity in Africa: a decade in review. AIDS Rev. 2012;14:83–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Worobey M, Gemmel M, Teuwen DE, Haselkorn T, Kunstman K, Bunce M, et al. Direct evidence of extensive diversity of HIV-1 in Kinshasa by 1960. Nature. 2008;455:661–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hemelaar J, Gouws E, Ghys PD, Osmanov S. Isolation W-UNfH, characterisation. Global trends in molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 during 2000-2007. AIDS. 2011;25:679–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hemelaar J. The origin and diversity of the HIV-1 pandemic. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:182–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldrich C, Hemelaar J. Global HIV-1 diversity surveillance. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:691–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Phanuphak N, Lo YR, Shao Y, Solomon SS, O’Connell RJ, Tovanabutra S, et al. HIV Epidemic in Asia: implications for HIV vaccine and other prevention trials. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2015;31:1060–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Mann JK, Barton JP, Ferguson AL, Omarjee S, Walker BD, Chakraborty A, et al. The fitness landscape of HIV-1 gag: advanced modeling approaches and validation of model predictions by in vitro testing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003776.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Das P, Horton R. The cultural challenge of HIV/AIDS. Lancet. 2012;380:309–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Ahmed MO, Dau AA, Agnan MM. Hepatitis C virus in North Africa: an emerging threat. Sci World J. 2016;2016:7370524.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Buonaguro L, Tornesello ML, Buonaguro FM. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype distribution in the worldwide epidemic: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. J Virol. 2007;81:10209–19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Daw MA, Dau AA. Hepatitis C virus in Arab world: a state of concern. Sci World J. 2012;2012:719494.Google Scholar
  13. Hemelaar J, Gouws E, Ghys PD, Osmanov S. Global and regional distribution of HIV-1 genetic subtypes and recombinants in 2004. AIDS. 2006;20:W13–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maartens G, Celum C, Lewin SR. HIV infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Lancet. 2014;384:258–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Laeyendecker O, Brookmeyer R, Cousins MM, Mullis CE, Konikoff J, Donnell D, et al. HIV incidence determination in the United States: a multiassay approach. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:232–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Geretti AM. HIV-1 subtypes: epidemiology and significance for HIV management. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006;19:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Abecasis AB, Wensing AM, Paraskevis D, Vercauteren J, Theys K, Van de Vijver DA, et al. HIV-1 subtype distribution and its demographic determinants in newly diagnosed patients in Europe suggest highly compartmentalized epidemics. Retrovirology. 2013;10:7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ranga U, Banerjea A, Chakrabarti S, Mitra D. HIV/AIDS research in India: past, present and future. Curr Sci. 2010;98:335–45.Google Scholar
  20. Nasirian M, Karamouzian M, Haghdoost AA. Why is the number of HIV/AIDS-related publications low in the MENA region? Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(Suppl 3):13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sullivan PS, Jones JS, Baral SD. The global north: HIV epidemiology in high-income countries. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9:199–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. World Health Organization. HIV surveillance in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region: regional update 2012; 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Bozicevic I, Riedner G, Calleja JMG. HIV surveillance in MENA: recent developments and results. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(Suppl 3):14–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Daw MA, Tloba S, Dau AA. Tracing and modelling HIV/AIDS epidemic among Libyan children: intervention to prevent. Clinical Infection. 2013; R 2874 ESCMID, Berlin, Germany (R2874).Google Scholar
  25. Bagasra O, Alsayari M, Bullard-Dillard R, Daw MA. The Libyan HIV outbreak how do we find the truth? Libyan J Med. 2007;2:57–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Daw M, Elkhammas E. Libyan medical education; time to move forward. Libyan J Med. 2008;3:1–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Dau AA. Libyan armed conflict 2011: mortality, injury and population displacement. Afr J Emerg Med. 2011;2015:2.Google Scholar
  28. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Dau AA. Geographic distribution of HCV genotypes in Libya and analysis of risk factors involved in their transmission. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:367.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, In association with Libyan Study Group of H, HIV. Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection in Libya: results from a national population based survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Viñoles J, Serra M, Russi JC, Ruchansky D, Sosa-Estani S, Montano SM, et al. Sero-incidence and phylogeny of human immunodeficiency virus infections in a cohort of commercial sex workers in Montevideo, Uruguay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72:495–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Salminen MO, Koch C, Sanders-Buell E, Ehrenberg PK, Michael NL, Carr JK, et al. Recovery of virtually full-length HIV-1 provirus of diverse subtypes from primary virus cultures using the polymerase chain reaction. Virology. 1995;213:80–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2015.
  33. Daw MA, Shabash A, El-Bouzedi A, Dau AA, In association with the Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV. Seroprevalence of HBV, HCV & HIV co-infection and risk factors analysis in Tripoli-Libya. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e98793.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Akala FA, Semini I. Characterizing the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the Middle East and North Africa: time for strategic action. World Bank Publications; 2010.Google Scholar
  35. Mumtaz G, Hilmi N, McFarland W, Kaplan RL, Akala FA, Semini I, et al. Are HIV epidemics among men who have sex with men emerging in the Middle East and North Africa?: a systematic review and data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000444.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi AA, Ahmed MO, Dau AA, Agnan MM, Drah AM. Geographic integration of hepatitis C virus: a global threat. World J Virol. 2016;5:170–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Navadeh S, Mirzazadeh A, Gouya MM, Farnia M, Alasvand R, Haghdoost AA. HIV prevalence and related risk behaviours among prisoners in Iran: results of the national biobehavioural survey 2009. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(Suppl 3):36–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Salem AH, Batzer MA. Distribution of the HIV resistance CCR5-Delta32 allele among Egyptians and Syrians. Mutat Res. 2007;616:175–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Karray-Hakim H, Barin F, Fki-Berrajah L, Kanoun F, Ben Jmaa M, Hammami A. Characterization of HIV-1 subtypes in Sfax, Tunisia. Tunis Med. 2003;81:184–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. El Harti E, Alami M, Khattabi H, Bennani A, Zidouh A, Benjouad A, et al. Some characteristics of the HIV epidemic in Morocco. East Mediterr Health J. 2002;8:819–25.Google Scholar
  41. Bouzeghoub S, Jauvin V, Recordon-Pinson P, Garrigue I, Amrane A, el Belabbes H, et al. High diversity of HIV type 1 in Algeria. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2006;22:367–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. de Silva TI, van Tienen C, Onyango C, Jabang A, Vincent T, Loeff MF, et al. Population dynamics of HIV-2 in rural West Africa: comparison with HIV-1 and ongoing transmission at the heart of the epidemic. AIDS. 2013;27:125–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Esbjornsson J, Mild M, Mansson F, Norrgren H, Medstrand P. HIV-1 molecular epidemiology in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa: origin, demography and migrations. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17025.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Paraskevis D, Nikolopoulos G, Tsiara C, Paraskeva D, Antoniadou A, Lazanas M, et al. HIV-1 outbreak among injecting drug users in Greece, 2011: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:19962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Paraskevis D, Pybus O, Magiorkinis G, Hatzakis A, Wensing AM, van de Vijver DA, et al. Tracing the HIV-1 subtype B mobility in Europe: a phylogeographic approach. Retrovirology. 2009;6:49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Garrett L. HIV and National Security: where are the links? New York: Council on Foreign Relations; 2005.Google Scholar
  47. Whitney JB, Ruprecht RM. Live attenuated HIV vaccines: pitfalls and prospects. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17:17–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gisselquist D. Double standards in research ethics, health-care safety, and scientific rigour allowed Africa’s HIV/AIDS epidemic disasters. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20:839–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Nsagha DS, Weledji EP, Nsagha SM, Tantoh FW, Tanue EA, Njunda AL, et al. The victories and vexations of HIV and AIDS: an African critical public health perspective. Am J Epidemiol Infect Dis. 2015;3:50–60.Google Scholar
  50. Lukashov VV, Kuiken CL, Vlahov D, Coutinho RA, Goudsmit J. Evidence for HIV type 1 strains of US intravenous drug users as founders of AIDS epidemic among intravenous drug users in northern Europe. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 1996;12:1179–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Menu E, Truong TX, Lafon ME, Nguyen TH, Müller-Trutwin MC, Nguyen TT, et al. HIV type 1 Thai subtype E is predominant in South Vietnam. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 1996;12:629–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lai A, Simonetti FR, Zehender G, De Luca A, Micheli V, Meraviglia P, et al. HIV-1 subtype F1 epidemiological networks among Italian heterosexual males are associated with introduction events from South America. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42223.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Saad MD, Shcherbinskaya AM, Nadai Y, Kruglov YV, Antonenko SV, Lyullchuk MG, et al. Molecular epidemiology of HIV type 1 in Ukraine: birthplace of an epidemic. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2006;22:709–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang Z, Hu S, Liu J, Xu J, He L, Jiang Y, et al. CD4+ CD38+ HLA-DR+ cells: a predictor of viral set point in Chinese men with primary HIV infection who have sex with men. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64:423–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramjee G, Gouws E. Prevalence of HIV among truck drivers visiting sex workers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:44–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Ahmed MO, Dau AA, Agnan MM, In association with the Libyan Study Group of H, et al. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus and genotype distribution in immigrants crossing to Europe from North and sub-Saharan Africa. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14:517–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Ahmed MO, Dau AA, Agnan MM, Drah AM, et al. Prevalence of human immune deficiency virus in immigrants crossing to Europe from North and Sub-Saharan Africa. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14:637–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement