Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case Report
  • Open Access

Urethral calculi with a urethral fistula: a case report and review of the literature

  • 1, 2,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 2Email author
BMC Research Notes201710:444

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2798-z

  • Received: 5 April 2016
  • Accepted: 31 August 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

To explore and summarize the reasons why urethral calculi cause a urethral fistula.

Case presentation

We retrospectively studied 1 patient in Xiangya hospital and all relevant literature published in English between 1989 and 2015. The patients (including those reported in the literature) were characterized by age, origin, location of calculus, size of calculus, fistulous track, and etiological factors. Most of urethral calculi associated with a urethral fistula were native generated. Urethral calculi can be formed in various locations of the urethra, and the size of the calculus ranged from small (multiple) calculi to giant stones. The fistula external orifice located at the root of the penis was relatively common, and there were various etiological factors, such as urethral strictures, urethral trauma induced by long-term catheterization, lumbar fractures, and congenital anomaly factors. They were managed by the excision of the fistulous tract, retrieval of the urethral stones, and/or debridement and pus drainage operations.

Conclusion

Some elements, such as trauma, recurrent urinary tract infections, abscess formation induced by long-term catheterization, and urethral calculus, may be the risk factors for a urethral fistula.

Keywords

  • Urethral calculus
  • Urethral fistula
  • Urinary tract infections
  • Suprapubic catheter

Background

Calculi in the urethra are uncommon, representing only 1–2% of all calculi in the genito-urinary tract [1], and urethral calculi causing urethrocutaneous fistula are extremely rare. Only a few cases of urethral calculi causing a urethral fistula have been reported in the literature [26]. Here, we present a more complicated case of urethral steinstrasse causing urethrocutaneous fistula with a long-term suprapubic catheter (SPC). Through this work, we hope to gain clinicians’ and patients’ attention concerning urethral calculi with a urethral fistula, a problem which has, so far, been under-reported.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old Chinese man experienced pain and swelling of the penile-scrotal area and had a history of the passage of purulent fluid passing through a penile ventral fistula of 3 months’ duration (Fig. 1). He had history of a neurogenic bladder and the prolonged use of the SPC after the suprapubic catheter insertion. The dysfunctional bladder was accompanied with repeated unconscious urine outflow and occasional purulent secretion discharge from the urethra, which eventually progressed to urethral atresia (Fig. 1). The patient did not replace the SPC on schedule and also failed to accept treatment in a timely manner in accordance with his doctor’s advice before the urethrocutaneous fistula formed and the disease progressed. A rectal examination revealed no purulent secretions or rectal fistula formation. Computed tomography (CT) of the soft tissue in the penis revealed multiple calculi in the region of the distal penile area (Fig. 2a) and the suppurative infection of the fascia space in the perineal region (Fig. 2b) accompanied with a thickened urinary bladder (Fig. 2c). After replacing the suprapubic catheter, the patient underwent a debridement and pus drainage operation with the excision of the fistulous tract and retrieval of the urethral stones. Intraoperatively, dense scar tissue of the penile urethra was found, with the complete obliteration in the anterior urethra. The patient was administered intravenous fluids and antibiotics in the perioperative period. After recovery, he returned to the hospital monthly to replace the SPC. The patient’s condition was followed for 6 months, during which time the SPC blockage, severe urinary tract infections (UTIs), urinary calculi, and renal damage did not recur.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Urethrocutaneous fistula at the ventral side of the penis with a purulent fluid outflow through the fistula, and a long-term suprapubic catheter

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a Computed tomography scan of the soft tissue in the penis showing multiple calculi in the distal urethra. b Computed tomography scan of the pelvis showing a thickened urinary bladder and Foley’ s catheter through the abdominal wall. c Computed tomography scan of the scrotum showing a purulent infection and its spread in the perineal fascia space

Literature review

We searched PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) for articles published in English between 1989 and December 2015 with the terms “urethral calculus”, “urethral steinstrasse”, “fistula”, “urethral fistula”, “urethrocutaneous fistula”, or “recto-urethral fistula”. There were 5 reports included in our study (Table 1). In these studies, all the urethral calculi were native generated (they were formed de novo in the urethra) and formed in different locations of the urethra (in the proximal penile, bulbar, and posterior urethra regions), the size of the calculi ranged from small (the size of a grain of sand) to massive (stones ~6 × 5 cm), and it was common to find the fistula external orifice at the root of the penis. There were also various etiological factors, such as the urethral stricture, urethral trauma induced by long-term catheterization, lumbar fractures, and congenital anomaly factors. Some cases exhibited anatomic abnormalities, such as having a stone in the large diverticulum. Initially, these cases were managed with suprapubic cystostomy and intravenous antibiotics. Later, the patients underwent external urethrotomy and stone retrieval.
Table 1

Urethral calculus associated with urethral fistula

No.

Case load

Age

Ethnicity

Native/migratorya

Location of calculus

Size of calculus (cm)

Fistulous track

Etiological factors

1

1

38-year-old

Indian

Native

Penobulbar junction [2]

6 × 5

Near the penoscrotal junction

Stricture of penile urethra distalb

2

1

41-year-old

Osmanli

Native

At the prostatic urethra [3]

5.9 × 3.2 × 2.8

Below the radix of penis

Urethral trauma as a result of long-standing urethral catheter drainage

3

1

30-year-old

English

Native

Recto-urethral fistula [4]

5 × 3.5

The membranous urethra

Born with abnormalities

4

1

40-year-old

Indian

Native

In proximal penile, bulbar, and posterior urethra [5]

Multiple calculi

At the root of the penis

Urethral stricture

5

1

37-year-old

Japanese

Native

Prostatic urethral [6]

4.2 × 3.4 × 2.1

Urethrocutaneous fistula in the perineal region

A lumbar vertebral fracture

aNative: those formed de novo in the urethra. Migratory: those formed in the bladder or kidney with secondary descent

bExisted anatomic abnormality, the stone in large diverticulum

Discussion

Urethral calculi accounted for only 1–2% of the urinary tract stones. Urethral calculi that cause urethral fistula are extremely rare [1], but they still cause serious discomfort in many patients with the disease. In order to obtain a deep understanding of the disease, we analyzed the origin of the urethral calculi and summarized the causes of the urethral calculi that result in a urethral fistula.

The origin and management of the urethral calculus

Urethral calculi are either formed in the native urethra or migrate from the upper urinary tract [7]. Primary native calculi (those formed de novo in the urethra) are usually small and come in multiples, and secondary migratory calculi (those formed in the upper urinary tract with secondary downward descent) are usually large [8]. We found that the size of the primary native urethral calculi ranged from 2 to 3 mm to 6 cm, larger calculi usually occur in the posterior urethra and vesico-prostatic urethra, and a small calculus is commonly found in the anterior urethra. Primary urethral stones are generally composed of magnesium ammonium phosphate (struvite) [8]. This finding is consistent with our investigation of the stone components. The stones are formed in the urethra either behind some stricture or within a poorly drained communicating cavity, with an obstruction, stagnation, infection, and/or inflammation acting as the predisposing factor [9]. The above predisposing factors exactly explain the formation of various urethral stones in the studies. Secondary or migratory stones are usually composed of calcium oxalate or citrate [3], and they are very common. Migratory stones are most often encountered in association with urethral stricture disease or other forms of urethral obstruction [10].

The main symptoms are acute urinary retention, frequency, a burning sensation in the urethra during urination, a burning sensation in the perineum and/or rectum, or a stinging in the anus. Other less common symptoms included haematuria, dribbling or incontinence, interruption of the urinary stream, and a history of having passed a stone. Management of urethral calculi varied according to the site, size, and associated urethral disease. Retrograde manipulation into the urinary bladder followed by litholapaxy or lithotripsy is a suitable procedure for small urethral calculi. Anterior urethral calculi can be removed with surface anesthesia, endoscopic removal, or ventral meatotomy [11].

Etiology and treatment of the urethral fistula

Urethral fistulas may be acquired or congenital. Acquired urethral fistulas may be neoplastic, traumatic, or caused by a urethral foreign body or infection [1215]. Urethral fistulas have been found after a straddle injury [16] and blunt penile trauma [17]. They can also occur as a complication of penile surgery. Urethral fistulas have been described after circumcision [18] and operations for priapism [19]. In this study, we found that the majority of the urethral fistulas were found were secondary to urethral calculi complicated by trauma and infection. They may have occurred as a result of a penile-scrotum abscess. The patients with primary urethral stones were usually asymptomatic or had chronic voiding problems. An important cause of a urethral fistula may be related to delayed treatment. A congenital urethral fistula represents either an embryonic urethral blowout behind a distal congenital obstruction or segmental embryonic arrest so that the mesoderm fails to encircle the developing groove at the site of the fistula [12]. Congenital urethral fistulas may be associated with anorectal atretic malformations, which is consistent with the No. 3 case in Table 1. The fistula of the membranous urethra extended into an abscess cavity which contained the calculus and communicated with the rectum. In the most recent studies, all patients underwent the excision of the fistulous tract and retrieval of the urethral stones [26], while only some of the patients with a penile-scrotum abscess underwent a debridement and pus drainage operation. It was necessary to administer antibiotics to the patients during the perioperative period.

Urethral steinstrasse causing urethrocutaneous fistula with a long-term suprapubic catheter

The SPC is a popular method for managing long-term bladder drainage in voiding dysfunction [20]. Although a SPC has a high success rate, there can be several complications from its use, including UTIs, bladder stones, upper tract calculi, renal scarring, vesicoureteral reflux, urethral incontinence, and even bladder cancer [21, 22]. Urethral steinstrasse was likely caused by repeated UTIs with a long-term SPC. These stones formed in the bladder with a secondary migration to the urethra that was complicated with trauma and infection, which ultimately resulted in the urethral fistula. There were 2 concurrent fistulas in the patient involved in this study, the penile fistula caused by the calculi injuries and the scrotal fistula caused by a serious fascia space infection.

Conclusions

This study identified some predisposing factors of urethral calculus with a urethral fistula. Patients suffering from this problem can be treated with the excision of the fistulous tract, retrieval of the urethral stones, and/or a debridement and pus drainage operation. The complications seriously affect the quality of life and even cause more serious consequences, so clinicians and patients should be aware of them.

Abbreviations

SPC: 

suprapubic catheter

CT: 

computed tomography

UTIs: 

urinary tract infections

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ZT participated in the design of this study, RX performed the statistical analysis. LH carried out the study, together with FZ, XX, ZC, and collected important background information. ZW drafted the manuscript. MZ conceived of this study, and participated in the design and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient for allowing us to publish this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the paper.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the wife of the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Xiangya Hospital (Approval Number: 201512532). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NCSF) (Grant Number 81570627) and the Key Project of Science and Technology of Hunan Province (2016JC2044). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
(2)
Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
(3)
Department of Urology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, China

References

  1. Koga S, Arakaki Y, Matsuoka M, Ohyama C. Urethral calculi. Br J Urol. 1990;65(3):288–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Prakash J, Sharma P, Sankhwar S, Goel A. Large anterior urethral calculus presented as scrotal mass with urethrocutaneous fistula. BMJ Case Rep. 2013. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-200805.Google Scholar
  3. Kaplan M, Atakan IH, Kaya E, Aktoz T, Inci O. Giant prostatic urethral calculus associated with urethrocutaneous fistula. Int J Urol. 2006;13(5):643–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rowe PH, Taylor PR, Mason RC, Joyce MR, McColl I. Calculus in a congenital recto-urethral fistula: a late presentation. J R Soc Med. 1988;81:422–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kumar S, Sharma S, Ganesamoni R, Singh SK. Urethral steinstrasse with urethrocutaneous fistula. Urology. 2012;79(2):e1–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Toyoshima Y, Hosokawa Y, Hashimura M, Takada S, Hayashi Y, Fujimoto K, et al. A case of prostatic urethral calculus associated with perineal abscess and urethrocutaneous fistula. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2012;58(1):35–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shanmugam TV, Dhanapal V, Rajaraman T, Chandrasekar CP, Balashanmugam KP. Giant urethral calculi. Hosp Med. 2000;61(8):582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Usta MF, Baykara M, Erdoğru T, Köksal IT. Idiopathic prostatic giant calculi in a young male patient. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37:295–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lows OS, Kirw JJ. Clinical urology, vol. 1. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company; 1956.Google Scholar
  10. McCall RW, Bann MP. Lower urinary tract calculi and alcifications. In: Pollak HM, editor. Clinical urography. Saunders: USA; 1992. p. 1904–15.Google Scholar
  11. Wollin TA, Singal RK, Whelan T, Dicecco R, Razvi HA, Denstedt JD. Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy for treatment of large bladder calculi. J Endourol. 1999;13(10):739–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Horton CE, Devine CJ, Graham JK. Fistulas of the penile urethra. Plas Reconstr Surg. 1980;66(3):407–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakazawa S, Uemura M, Miyagawa Y, Tsujimura A, Nonomura N. Urethral fistulaand scrotal abscess associated with colovesical fistula due to the sigmoid colon cancer. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2015;61(9):375–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramírez Martín D, Aragón Chamizo J, Jara Rascón J, Ogaya Piniés G, Piñero J, Herranz Amo F, et al. Recto-urethral fistulasecondary to prostate cancer. Arch Esp Urol. 2014;67(1):92–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Singh O, Gupta SS. Urethral foreign body causing urethral fistula. Urol J. 2012;9(1):430–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ochsner MG, Joshi PN. Urethrocavernosus fistula. J Urol. 1982;127(6):1190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Palaniswamy R, Rao MS, Bapna BC, Chary KS. Urethro-cavernous fistula from blunt penile trauma. J Trauma. 1981;21(3):242–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ceylan K, Burhan K, Yilmaz Y, Can S, Kuş A, Mustafa G. Severe complications of circumcision: an analysis of 48 cases. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(1):32–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zheng DC, Yao HJ, Zhang K, Xu MX, Chen Q, Chen YB, et al. Unsatisfactory outcomes of prolonged ischemic priapism without early surgical shunts: our clinical experience and a review of the literature. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):75–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jamison J, Maguire S, McCann J. Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD004375. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004375.pub4.Google Scholar
  21. Sheriff MK, Foley S, McFarlane J, Nauth-Misir R, Craggs M, Shah PJ. Long-term suprapubic catheterisation: clinical outcome and satisfaction survey. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(3):171–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sugimura T, Arnold E, English S, Moore J. Chronic suprapubic catheterization in the management of patients with spinal cord injuries: analysis of upper and lower urinary tract complications. BJU Int. 2008;101(11):1396–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement