Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Cross-sectional study for determining the prevalence of Q fever in small ruminants and humans at El Minya Governorate, Egypt

  • Mostafa F. N. Abushahba1Email author,
  • Abdelbaset E. Abdelbaset2,
  • Mohamed S. Rawy3 and
  • Sylvia O. Ahmed1
BMC Research Notes201710:538

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2868-2

Received: 7 June 2017

Accepted: 24 October 2017

Published: 30 October 2017

Abstract

Objective

Q fever is a febrile illness caused by the bacterial pathogen Coxiella burnetii (C. burnetii) and is transmitted to humans from small ruminants via contaminated secreta and excreta of infected animals. This pathogen threatens public health; however, little is known regarding Q fever prevalence in humans and small ruminants. Therefore, we employed a cross-sectional design to determine the Q fever seroprevalence and the associated risk factors in small ruminants and their owners in El Minya Governorate, Egypt between August 2016 and January 2017.

Results

The seroprevalence of C. burnetii IgG antibodies was 25.68% (28 of 109), 28.20% (11 of 39) and 25.71% (9 of 35) in sheep, goats, and humans, respectively. None of the studied variables in small ruminants differed significantly between the seropositive and seronegative animals. There was a significantly higher prevalence (P = 0.0435) and increased odds of exposure was also observed among women (odds ratio, OR = 5.43 (95% CI 1.058–27.84) when compared to men; nevertheless, no significant difference was noted between the infection rate in small ruminants and humans. This study clearly points out that Q fever may be emerging in the area which lay the foundation for early prediction and better management of possible future outbreaks.

Keywords

Q feverZoonosisSmall ruminantAbortionSeroprevalenceEgypt

Introduction

Q “query” fever was primarily used to depict the inexplicable febrile illness that occurred among abattoir workers in Australia in 1935. Its causal agent remained enigmatic for a brief period, then was identified and named C. burnetii [1]. Based on recent phylogenetic studies, this agent was found to be closely related to Legionella and no longer regarded as Rickettsia [2]. In addition to man, C. burnetii is adapted to several animal species primarily including sheep and goats. In these primary reservoirs, the disease is mostly dormant; however, C. burnetii-induced abortions can occur in clinical cases, with massive bacterial shedding in placental membranes, birth fluids, milk, and feces in both conditions [3]. Once humans are exposed (through inhalation, contact or ingestion), Q fever remains dormant in most of the infected cases whilst clinical infections are expressed either in acute (self-limited febrile illness, pneumonia or hepatitis) or chronic forms (principally endocarditis) [1]. The various non-specific clinical manifestations associated with C. burnetii infection hampers prompt diagnosis, resulting in the development of chronic form as well as massive disease underestimation [1, 4]. Long ago, the disease has been considered an emerging public health concern in many countries [58]. Despite Q fever substantial worldwide potential, several localities in Egypt still either neglected or have scarce epidemiological information about the disease, such as El Minya Governorate. Therefore, this work aimed to determine the preliminary seroprevalence of Q fever in El Minya and the associated risk factors in small ruminants and their owners.

Main text

Methods

Sampling area

The present study has focused on El Minya Governorate (~ 245 km south of Cairo) to clarify the preliminary epidemiological status of Q fever (Fig. 1). The majority of El Minya residents live in rural areas and mainly depend on agriculture. They rear sheep and goats on a small-scale (2–50 animals) either separately or in one herd, as a source of financial security, meat, wool, or rarely milk. The area was selected because of no epidemiological surveys regarding the disease has been conducted before.
Fig. 1

Map showing the sampling area with the survey sites of Q fever. El Minya Governorate is highlighted by a circle on the map of Egypt. Samples were collected from different villages located at Dayr Mawas and Matay districts and are shown by a blue color in the map of the governorate

(Downloaded from http://www.gadm.org and modified by ArcGis software)

Animal sera

A total of 148 serum samples were randomly collected from 109 sheep (females) and 39 goats (7 males and 32 females) from different villages at Dayr Mawas and Matay districts. The mean age of the selected animals was 4.31 ± 1.78 and 3.66 ± 1.67 for sheep and goats, respectively. Blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture using sterile syringes and injected directly into plain vacutainer tubes. Labeling numbers and the respective data, such as locality, age, gender, pregnancy status, and abortion history were included. The tubes were kept in an ice box and transferred immediately to the laboratory at the Department of Animal Hygiene & Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University. The collected blood samples were centrifuged at 1800×g for 15 min and the sera were harvested and stored at − 20 °C until analyzed.

Human sera

A sum of 35 individuals (mean age 38.63 ± 11.70) including 22 males and 13 females were included where all were either sheep and/or goat breeders on a small-scale. Using a sterile syringe, 5 CC blood was taken by a professional technician from each participant. The samples were labeled with numbers and handled as described. The data regarding name, age, gender, clinical history, and raw milk consumption habit for each respective sample were included.

Serological assay

Serum samples were tested for the presence of IgG by using ID Screen® Q Fever Indirect Multi-species (ID.vet innovative diagnostics, Grabels, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical densities (ODs) were measured by Stat Fax 2100 Microplate Reader (Awareness Technology INC, Fl, USA) at 450 nm. Serum positivity percentage (S/P%) was calculated as follows: S/P% = (OD tested sample − OD negative control)/(OD positive control − OD negative control) × 100. Samples with an S/P value < 40% were considered negative, those between 40 and 50% were considered inconclusive, and those between 50 and 80% were considered positive, while those gave ˃ 80% were considered strong positive.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between the categorical variables. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were computed for the data. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The prevalence and associated risk factors of C. burnetii IgG antibodies in sheep, goats, and humans in contact at El Minya Governorate was determined in the present study. The overall seroprevalence among small ruminants recruited to this study was 26.35% (39 of 148) with a 25.68% (28 of 109) in sheep and a 28.20% (11 of 39) in goats. Although there was no significant association between the different variables (locality, age, pregnancy status and history of abortion) and the infection rate among the examined animals, the OR indicated varied exposure rates. Additionally, no significant difference between the infection rate in small ruminants compared to humans in contact was found (Table 1).
Table 1

Impact of different variables on the prevalence of Q fever in small ruminants

Variable

Species examined

Sheep

Goat

No. tested

Positive no. (%)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

No. tested

Positive no. (%)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Locality

 Dayr Mawas

42

10 (23.8)

0.85 (0.35–2.1)

1.18 (0.48–2.86)

19

3 (15.78)

0.281 (0.06–1.29)

3.56 (0.77–16.32)

 Matay

67

18 (26.86)

20

8 (35)

 Total

109

28 (25.68)

39

11 (28.20)

Age

 1–2 years

22

5 (22.73)

0.82 (0.27–2.47)

1.22 (0.4–3.69)

12

2 (16.66)

0.40 (0.07–2.23)

2.5 (0.45–13.9)

 > 2 years

87

23 (26.44)

27

9 (33.33)

 Total

109

28 (25.68)

39

11 (28.20)

Gender

 Male

7

1 (14.28)

0.366 (0.038–3.46)

2.73 (0.28–25.76)

 Female

109

28 (25.68)

32

10 (31.25)

 Total

109

28 (25.68)

39

11 (28.20)

Pregnancy

 Yes

71

19 (26.76)

1.2 (0.47–2.9)

0.85 (0.34–2.12)

18

6 (33.33)

1.3 (0.27–5.7)

0.8 (0.17–3.65)

 No

38

9 (23.68)

14

4 (28.57)

 Total

109

28 (25.68)

32

10 (31.25)

Abortion history

 Yes

5

2 (40)

2 (0.32–13)

0.5 (0.79–3.16)

1

1 (100)

7.1 (0.26–190.7)

0.14 (0.005–3.78)

 No

104

26 (25)

31

9 (29)

 Total

109

28 (25.68)

32

10 (31.25)

On the other hand, a 25.71% (9 of 35) humans were positive for C. burnetii IgG antibodies, of which 8.57% (3 of 35) were males and 17.14% (6 of 35) were females. Human gender was the only statistically significant risk factor (P = 0.0435) in this study (Table 2).
Table 2

Impact of gender and age on the prevalence of Q fever in humans

Variable

No. tested

Positive no. (%)

Negative no. (%)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Gender

 Male

22

3 (13.64)

19 (86.36)

0.18 (0.036–0.94)

5.43 (1.058–27.84)

P = 0.0435

 Female

13

6 (46.15)

7 (53.85)

 Total

35

9 (25.71)

26 (74.29)

Age

 15–39 years

19

4 (21.1)

15 (78.9)

0.59 (0.13–2.7)

1.7 (0.37–7.9)

 40–63 years

16

5 (31.25)

11 (68.75)

 Total

35

9 (25.71)

26 (74.29)

Two of the positive humans had a history of self-limited fever with pneumonia or hepatitis and one woman had a history of prolonged fever of unknown cause. Moreover, 3 seropositive females had a complaint of heart disorder when sampling. Finally, 5 out of the 9 seropositive individuals for Q fever were keeping seropositive animals during the sampling period (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Discussion

As a bacterium of unique merits both outside and inside hosts [9], our information regarding C. burnetii and its worldwide impact on humans and animals needs expansion. Limited studies have focused on Q fever in Egypt since becoming public health concern in 1995 [10, 11]. That warrants the need for more research to realize the disease status in the previously neglected areas such as El Minya Governorate.

In the present study, the seroprevalence of C. burnetii IgG antibodies in El Minya Governorate was 25.68 and 28.20% in sheep and goats, respectively. Previous seroprevalence studies conducted in different Egyptian Governorates have shown somewhat comparable results. For instance, our results were higher than those reported from North Sinai, Ismailia and Qaluobia Governorates for both sheep and goats [1214]. On the other hand, in Cairo, Giza, and El-Fayum Governorates, the Q fever seroprevalence was higher than that reported for sheep and lower for goats in the present study [15]. In other countries, Q fever seroprevalence was 23.7 and 33.9% [16, 17], respectively in Iranian sheep, 22.4% in Iranian goats [17], 8.67% in Japan [18] and 20% in Turkey [19] in sheep.

Our results showed no significant difference between the study regions. However, mixed rearing of sheep and goats in one herd at Matay district may explain the increased odds of exposure of goats to infection in that region as compared to Dayr Mawas, which does not typically house sheep and goats in one place.

As seen in our investigation, no significant relationship was observed between age and Q fever infection rate indicating that all ages were relatively at equal risk of acquiring infection. This may be due to animal exposure to a common source of infection and disease emergence in the study area [13, 16]. This result was consistent with those investigators [13, 16], meanwhile, other reports found that the age of examined sheep and goats has significantly impacted the frequency of Q fever occurrence [17, 20, 21].

Regarding gender, previous studies reported a higher seroprevalence among examined female than male animals [2224]. Although the current study showed a similar finding with high odds of exposure among the examined female goats, the comparison is difficult because of high variation of numbers among examined animals from both genders.

In the current study, a slightly higher seroprevalence was observed among pregnant than non pregnant animals with nearly equal odds of exposure in both groups. Such a result further confirms our assumption that Q fever is emerging in the governorate and both pregnant and non-pregnant animals present a potential zoonotic risk for the humans residing in the region.

As is well-known, Q fever is mostly asymptomatic in small ruminants and abortion is the exclusive clinical consequence [3]. Keeping in mind that only three seropositive animals in the present study had a history of abortion, with the assumption that the C. burnetii was the definitive reason behind it, our finding also reported that most, if not all, of the seropositive animals were subclinically infected. This reinforces the fact that the vast majority of C. burnetii infections among animals in Egypt were inapparent because of relative tolerance of native breeds, which are commonly reared in Egypt, to infection [25].

Compared to previous studies conducted in Egypt regarding Q fever in humans, our results showed that the seroprevalence of Q fever among the tested humans in a close contact with small ruminants was 25.71% which is higher than that previously reported (23.3%) in a similar risk group [14] and those recorded by other researchers [12, 15, 25] who found that the seroprevalence of Q fever was 5, 16.3 and 19% among the individuals of intimate contact with ruminants, respectively.

Based on the current and aforementioned results, it seems clear that the study group, people in contact with ruminants, are at a growing risk of acquiring Q fever infection that warrants the need for continuous monitoring and maintaining effective source tracking. Moreover, previous Egyptian investigators have reported 72 and 32% seroprevalence rates of Q fever among human communities living in Behera Governorate and Nile River Delta of Egypt, respectively [26, 27]. In the present study, the gender was the only significant risk factor for Q fever infection in humans. Women exhibited greater odds of exposure to Q fever compared to men, which may be as a result of their active engagements in assisting parturient and aborted animals as well as drinking small ruminants’ raw milk.

Interestingly, the current study documented the presence of either historical and/or existing health complaints relevant to Q fever disease manifestations in some seropositive persons residing in the governorate. Accordingly, physicians’ awareness regarding Q fever epidemiology and clinical presentation has to be raised since prompt and precise diagnosis and intervention is strongly recommended especially in cases of C. burnetii-induced endocarditis [28].

Given that not all seropositive people for Q fever were rearing seroreactive animals at sampling time, effective infection source tracking remains difficult. However, in addition to the possible direct role of the examined small ruminants in transmitting Q fever to humans, the ability of C. burnetii to endure the drastic environmental conditions, and hence its force to persist in the environment with subsequent spread by the wind for long distances [1], also makes environment one of the possible sources of the infection. As a conclusion, the present study provides the first evidence that Q fever is circulating in animals and humans in El Minya Governorate and reinforces the fact that small ruminants are potential disease reservoirs. No statistical difference between the infection in animals and humans was found, indicating that Q fever may be emerging in the governorate. Gender was the only significant risk factor for human infection. Collectively, our study lays the foundation for early prediction and better management of possible Q fever outbreaks in the future and underscores the urgent need to initiate the perspective control measures for small ruminants and their owners.

Limitations

Although the present study could drive both veterinary and public health authorities to commence a unified protection strategy against Q fever in the governorate, a more comprehensive epidemiological picture could be achieved by extending the survey area and incorporating more disease hosts.

Abbreviations

°C: 

celsius

C. burnetii

Coxiella burnetii

CC: 

cubic centimeter

CI: 

confidence interval

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IgG: 

immunoglobulin G

Km: 

kilometer

nm: 

nanometer

OD: 

optical density

OR: 

odds ratio

P

probability

“Q” fever: 

“query” fever

S/P%: 

seropositivity percentage

×g

times gravity

~: 

approximately

<: 

less than

>: 

greater than

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MA designed and coordinated the study, shared in sampling and ELISA work, data analysis and wrote the manuscript. AA assisted in work, literature collection, manuscript writing and data analysis, MR participated in samples collection, data analysis and revising the manuscript. SA helped in sampling, data analysis and reviewing the final manuscript. All authors discussed the results, commented on the manuscript and gave final approval of the final version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Ahmed Abdelhalim, Department of Geology, Assiut University, Egypt for providing the maps.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All the data regarding this study are demonstrated in the manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written consent was not possible because neither literate nor illiterate participants agree to sign a such type of consent based on the Egyptian cultural settings especially in field studies. Verbal consent was taken from all adult participants and parental consent was attained prior to the participation of those under 18 years old. All participants were informed that the obtained information will be strictly confidential. Animal blood samples were collected following agreement of the owners and animals were handled according to the Assiut University regulatory rules for animal research. The method of consent and both the animal and human work were approved by the ethics committee of Assiut University, Egypt.

Funding

This research did not receive any research fund.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Hygiene & Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University
(2)
Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis, Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University
(3)
Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Minia University

References

  1. Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:518–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Minnick MF, Raghavan R. Genetics of Coxiella burnetii: on the path of specialization. Futur Microbiol. 2011;6:1297–314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Van den Brom R, van Engelen E, Roest HIJ, van der Hoek W, Vellema P. Coxiella burnetii infections in sheep or goats: an opinionated review. Vet Microbiol. 2015;181:119–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Weese JS, Fulford MB, editors. Companion animal zoonoses. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470958957. Accessed 27 Jul 2017.
  5. Lang GH. Q fever: an emerging public health concern in Canada. Can J Vet Res. 1989;53:1–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mostafavi E, Rastad H, Khalili M. Q fever: an emerging public health concern in Iran. Asian J Epidemiol. 2012;5:66–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schimmer B, Notermans DW, Harms MG, Reimerink JHJ, Bakker J, Schneeberger P, et al. Low seroprevalence of Q fever in The Netherlands prior to a series of large outbreaks. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140:27–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosnjak E, Hvass AMSW, Villumsen S, Nielsen H. Emerging evidence for Q fever in humans in Denmark: role of contact with dairy cattle. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1285–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gürtler L, Bauerfeind U, Blümel J, Burger R, Drosten C, Gröner A, et al. Coxiella burnetii—pathogenic agent of Q (query) fever. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41:60–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Botros BA, Soliman AK, Salib AW, Olson J, Hibbs RG, Williams JC, et al. Coxiella burnetii antibody prevalences among human populations in north-east Africa determined by enzyme immunoassay. J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;98:173–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gwida M, El-Ashker M, El-Diasty M, Engelhardt C, Khan I, Neubauer H. Q fever in cattle in some Egyptian Governorates: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:881.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Mazyad SAM, Hafez AO. Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) among man and farm animals in North Sinai, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2007;37:135–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. El-Mahallawy HS, Abou-Eisha AM, Fadel HM. Coxiella burnetii infections among small ruminants in Ismailia Governorate. SCVMJ. 2012;17:39–50.Google Scholar
  14. Khalifa NO, Elhofy FI, Fahmy HA, Sobhy MM, Agag MA. Seropervelance and molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii infection in sheep, goats and human in Egypt. ISOI J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2016;2:1–7.Google Scholar
  15. Nahed HG, Khaled AA-M. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies among farm animals and human contacts in Egypt. J Am Sci. 2012;8:619–21.Google Scholar
  16. Esmaeili S, Bagheri Amiri F, Mostafavi E. Seroprevalence survey of Q fever among sheep in Northwestern Iran. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:189–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ezatkhah M, Alimolaei M, Khalili M, Sharifi H. Seroepidemiological study of Q fever in small ruminants from Southeast Iran. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8:170–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Giangaspero M, Bonfini B, Orusa R, Savini G, Osawa T, Harasawa R. Epidemiological survey for Toxoplasma gondii, Chlamydia psittaci var. ovis, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Coxiella burnetii, Brucella spp., leptospirosis and Orf virus among sheep from northern districts of Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:679–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kennerman E, Rousset E, Gölcü E, Dufour P. Seroprevalence of Q fever (coxiellosis) in sheep from the Southern Marmara Region, Turkey. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;33:37–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Pérez AL, Astobiza I, Barandika JF, Atxaerandio R, Hurtado A, Juste RA. Short communication: investigation of Coxiella burnetii occurrence in dairy sheep flocks by bulk-tank milk analysis and antibody level determination. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:1581–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Akbarian Z, Ziay G, Schauwers W, Noormal B, Saeed I, Qanee AH, et al. Brucellosis and Coxiella burnetii infection in householders and their animals in secure villages in Herat Province, Afghanistan: a cross-sectional study. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004112.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Zahid MU, Hussain MH, Saqib M, Neubauer H, Abbas G, Khan I, et al. Seroprevalence of Q fever (Coxiellosis) in small ruminants of two districts in Punjab, Pakistan. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16:449–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2015.1852.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cetinkaya B, Kalender H, Ertas HB, Muz A, Arslan N, Ongor H, et al. Seroprevalence of coxiellosis in cattle, sheep and people in the east of Turkey. Vet Rec. 2000;146:131–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sakhaee E, Khalili M. The first serologic study of Q fever in sheep in Iran. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010;42:1561–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Abdel-Moein KA, Hamza DA. The burden of Coxiella burnetii among aborted dairy animals in Egypt and its public health implications. Acta Trop. 2017;166:92–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Samaha HA, Haggag YN, Nossair MA, Samar A. Serological detection of IgG against C. burnetti phase II in Behera Province Western Egypt. Alex J Vet Sci. 2012;37:33–40.Google Scholar
  27. Corwin A, Habib M, Watts D, Darwish M, Olson J, Botros B, et al. Community-based prevalence profile of arboviral, rickettsial, and Hantaan-like viral antibody in the Nile River Delta of Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;48:776–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Anderson A, Bijlmer H, Fournier PE, Graves S, Hartzell JD, Kersh GJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of Q fever—United States, 2013: recommendations from CDC and the Q fever working group. Mmwr. 2013;62:1–30.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement