Bacteriological study of calf colisepticemia in Alage Dairy Farm, Southern Ethiopia
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 18 July 2017
Accepted: 30 November 2017
Published: 7 December 2017
This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of E. coli which is the main cause of colisepticemia and the potential risk factors associated with the disease. A total of 74 calves less than 6 months age were selected for this study. For isolation and identification of E. coli, bacterial culture and biochemical tests were used.
Out of 74 calves selected for this study, 6 (8.11%) were positive for septicemic E. coli. Higher prevalence of 5 (8.93%) was recorded in Holstein Friesian breed than Boran breed 1 (5.56%). However, breed showed no significant difference on E. coli infections (P > 0.05). Higher prevalence of E. coli revealed below age of 30 days (17.39%) than calves aged between 30 and 90 days (8.33%) and above 90 days (0.00%). However, statistical association showed no difference (P > 0.05). Parity showed a significant difference in prevalence of E. coli (P < 0.05) in which infection increased with number of parity. Sex of the animal showed no association with infection of the calves (P > 0.05). Diarrheic calves showed higher prevalence (33.3%) than non-diarrheic calves (4.62%) with strong statistical association (P < 0.05). The present study showed a high prevalence of septicemic E. coli in the farm and intervention is strongly recommended.
Neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) is the principal cause of calf mortality affecting the livestock industry globally [1, 2]. Septicemia caused by E. coli is a common disease of neonatal calves which causes a severe diarrhea and mortalities. The disease has a complex pathology which is known to have a multiple etiological agent [2, 3]. Some of the pathogenic organisms which causes calf diarrhea includes bacteria, viruses, and protozoa . Co-infection make control of the disease more complicated . Many reports showed that E. coli is one of the cause of enteropathogenesis in early ages of calves . The incidence of calf diarrhea in neonates is reported in several studies and revealed a prevalence of 15–20% and rate of mortality showed from 1.5 to 8% . In addition, the frequent presence of non-specific clinical signs ae the main factors influencing targeted treatments . Diagnostic methods such as ELISA and PCR showed a better degree of detecting during mixed infections  and strain based diagnosis is important in providing appropriate information for proper therapeutic applications and finally control of the disease . Various studies showed that different bacterial infections specifically the enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, enteroinvasive, and enterohemorrhagic E. coli leads to calf colisepticemia and causes neonatal mortalities particularly in non-vaccinated calves and those which deprived of colostrum [9–11]. The presence of large cattle population in developing countries  and the frequent and persistence of neonatal mortality and morbidity due to calf diarrhea without knowing the root cause of infection attract our attention to conduct this study. In these study population, we have noticed a clinical symptom of early diarrhea and mortalities which is a typical symptom of calf colisepticemia. As explained above, there are many pathogens causing the disease but due to the budget limitations of the study to characterize all, we focused only on characterizing and estimating the prevalence of E. coli and its associated risk factors in Alage Dairy Farm, Southern Ethiopia.
Alage Dairy Farm is located at Alage agricultural technical and vocational education training college (ATVET) situated at 217 km South West of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in the vicinity of lakes Abijata and Shalla, located at 32 km to West of Bulbula. It belongs to the Agricultural Technical Vocational and Educational Training College under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development .
Alage Dairy Farm was established in 1980 with a total of 300 cows and 4 bulls. These dairy animals have both the Holstein–Friesian and Boran breed origin and were purchased from Stella dairy farm located in Holeta and private farms located in capital of Addis Ababa. These animals are managed under intensive management systems. In this study, we focused on a total 74 new born calves aged below 6 months. These calves are owned by the college and used for teaching and commercial purposes.
This study was conducted in all calves found in the farm and the study was approved by the college animal ethics committee and we followed the ethical guidelines for care and use of animals.
Blood sample collection
Strict aseptic procedures were used  to collect blood samples from jugular vein of the calves . A volume of 3 ml was collected into BD Vacutainer® blood collection tubes and transferred immediately to laboratory for analysis.
A loop of blood sample was streaked on MacConkey agar plate incubated aerobically at 37 °C. After 24 h, the bacterial colonies were provisionally identified on the basis of morphology and color change due to lactose reaction to the media, medium size (1–3 mm diameter), bright pink to red with flat or elevated surface and white edges was observed, which is an indication of colony growth .
Growth characteristic and biochemical reaction of E. coli
Characteristic of E. coli
Motility at 30 °C
Citrate utilization test
H2S production in TSI
Reaction in TSI
Yellow butt, yellow slunt
Data management and analysis
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17 . Prevalence of E. coli was calculated by dividing positive animals to a total number of animals studied. The explanatory variable age, breed, sex, parity of dam, and faecal consistency were considered as a potential risk factors and studied whether either has an association with septicemic E. coli. Fisher’s exact test method was used to interpret the statistical association. P-value less than 0.05 was required for significance.
A cross-sectional study to estimate the prevalence of septicemic E. coli in calves was conducted and blood samples were collected from calves of both indigenous (Boran) and exotic (Holstein Friesian) breeds under the age of 6 months. All the collected blood (N = 74) were subjected to primary and secondary biochemical tests and the overall prevalence of septicemic E. coli revealed 6 (8.11%). Different risk factors and their association with the prevalence of E. coli was also assessed and the result of each variable is showed as follows.
Prevalence of E. coli and associated risk factors
< 30 days
> 90 days
Parity of the dam
One or two
In this study, two groups of breeds was considered; Boran and Holstein–Friesian with a prevalence of 8.93 and 5.56% respectively. However, the statistical analysis showed no significant association (P > 0.05) with the prevalence of E. coli. The prevalence and its association with the risk factors is described in Table 2.
This study targeted at three groups of dams (cow calved one or two times, cow calved three times and cow calved more than three) and the prevalence of E. coli showed 26.33, 3.33 and 0.00% in all the groups respectively. The present finding showed that parity has also a significant (P < 0.05) association with prevalence of septicemic E. coli, Table 2.
During the study, we expected that sex of the calve might have an implication on the infection rate or prevalence of E. coli due to the difference in the management system between male and female calves and it showed a prevalence of 11.11 and 7.99% in male and female calves respectively. However, sex failed to show significant difference (P > 0.05) with the prevalence of E. coli (Table 2).
The present study further indicated that the prevalence E. coli in diarrheic and non-diarrheic calves was 33.3 and 4.6% respectively and fecal consistency showed significant (P < 0.05) association with prevalence of E. coli as summarized in Table 2.
The result of the present study demonstrated the presence of septicemic E. coli in neonates in the farm. This study showed the overall prevalence of 8.11%. Similar study indicated the prevalence of septicemic E. coli in neonates as 51% . However, this prevalence is higher because it targeted only clinically ill calves. Another study also showed a prevalence of 43.3% . Such variation in the prevalence of the disease might be due to difference in sampling strategies. For example, random sampling method shows a clear picture of the epidemiology of the disease than purposive type of sampling strategies. A study by Ghanbarpour and Mohammad  revealed a prevalence of 22% and it is comparably higher than the prevalence of the present study. This is due to the age of the neonates which was less than 10 days and all were clinically ill with calf diarrhea. This is justifiable because neonates are more susceptible to infection comparing to the older calves.
This study demonstrated the presence of statistical variation between different age group of calves. The prevalence between all age groups 5 (20.8%); below 30 days, 1(4.5%) between 30 and 90 days and 0 (0%) above 90 days was recorded. There was a significance (P < 0.05) association between different age groups. This age based difference in the prevalence of E. coli is supported by the rationale that younger calves are more susceptible to infection than older calves [9, 16, 21, 22]. Furthermore, E. coli can colonize the sterile intestine at early stage of neonate and those new born calves are more susceptible than adults specially if they take low colostrum .
Parity of the dam was considered to evaluate whether it contributes to the occurrence of septicemic E. coli and we showed a significance association (P < 0.05) between the dam parity and prevalence of E. coli. This finding agreed with Blood D.C.2002  stated that colostrum of heifer is lower in immunoglobulin (Ig) content than older cows and colostrum deprived calves are highly susceptible for colisepticemia [3, 23].
This showed a significant (P < 0.05) association with E. coli infection. Calves having diarrhea were found to harbor septicemic E. coli 3 (33%) and showed higher prevalence than non-diarrheic calves found with prevalence of 3 (4.6%). This finding agreed with Radostits et al.  which stated diarrheic calves showed 31% of septicemic E. coli. In addition, calves with diarrhea are likely to have septicemic E. coli leading to pneumonia, shock and death [23, 24].
Even through there is no statistical significant (P > 0.05) association between breed and E. coli infection, a difference in prevalence is supported by Brooks and Morce  explained that different breed have different degree of susceptibility and exotic breeds are more susceptible than indigenous breeds .
In this study, there was no significant (P > 0.05) association between male and female individuals with septicemic E. coli. However, prevalence showed male have relatively higher prevalence (11.11%) than female (7.6%). This relative variation is supported by Thickett et al.  who explained female calf have a better attention and more managed because owners believed to replace those cows leaving the herd. Moreover, good management and provision of adequate nutrition lowers diseases susceptibility . In conclusion, the present study clearly showed the presence of colisepticemia at herd level in the study area with the overall prevalence of 8.1%. This prevalence suggested that the disease in the farm has a possible risk of transmission from infected to healthy animals and it is a major threat for the production and productivity of the dairy cows and sufficient chemotherapeutic approach is recommended for the treatment of E. coli infection to control the disease epidemics.
Limitations of the study
We found difficult to discover the epidemiology of the disease in the area due to small sample size and budget issues to discover all pathogens causing neonatal calf diarrhea. No prior work was done on the investigations of calf colisepticemia and this limited our scope of study and analysis of our result.
MT proposed the idea and performed the experimental designs, analyzed data and drafted and wrote this paper, KD conducted experiments, reviewed, read and commented the draft paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are highly grateful to the University of Gondar for financial support and the Alage Technical and Vocational Training College, Microbiology Laboratory for the provision of laboratory supplies and technical supports.
The authors declared that there is no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting this finding can be found at email@example.com.
Consent to publish
The manuscript doesn’t include any data from human subjects in any kind.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval to study on calves was given by the animal ethics committee of Alage agricultural technical and vocational education training college (ATVET) and before this research has been conducted, a consent from the college management was given.
This work is funded by the University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia in collaboration with the Alage technical and Vocational Training College, Alage, Ethiopia.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Tajik J, Nazifi S, Naghib SM, Ghasrodasht AR. Comparison of electrocardiographic parameters and serum electrolytes and microelements between single infection of rotavirus and coronavirus and concurrent infection of Cryptosporidium parvum with rotavirus and coronavirus in diarrheic dairy calves. Comp Clin Pathol. 2012;21:241–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho Y, Yoon KJ. An overview of calf diarrhea—infectious etiology, diagnosis and intervention. J Vet Sci. 2014;15(1):1–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Izzo MM, Kirkland PD, Mohler VL, Perkins NR, Gunna AA, House JK. Prevalence major enteric pathogens in Australian dairy calves with diarrhea. Aust Vet J. 2011;89(5):167–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alfieri AA, Parazzi ME, Takiuchi E, Medici KC, Alfieri AF. Frequency of group A rotavirus in diarrhoeic calves in Brazilian cattle herds, 1998–2002. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2006;38:521–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gulliksen SM, Jor E, Lie KI, Hamnes IS, Loken T, Akerstedt J, et al. Enteropathogens and risk factors for diarrhea in Norwegian dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:5057–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorino T, Daudin JJ, Robin S, Sanaa M. Factors associated with time to neonatal diarrhoea in French beef calves. Prev Vet Med. 2005;68:91–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Athanassious R, Marsolais G, Assaf R, Dea S, Descoteaux JP, Dulude S, et al. Detection of bovine coronavirus and type A rotavirus in neonatal calf diarrhea and winter dysentery of cattle in Quebec: evaluation of three diagnostic methods. Can Vet J. 1994;35:163–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mayameei A, Mohammadi G, Yavari S, Afshari E, Omidi A. Evaluation of relationship between Rotavirus and Coronavirus infections with calf diarrhea by capture ELISA. Comp Clin Pathol. 2010;19:553–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Veterinary medicine a textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. 10th ed. London: B. Saunders; 2010. p. 25–35.Google Scholar
- Svensson CA, Linder A, Olsson SO. Mortality in Swedish dairy calves and replacement heifers. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89(12):4769–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142–201.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- ESAP. Livestock in food security roles and contributions. In: Proceeding of the 9th annual conference of the Ethiopian society of animal production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia August 30–31; 2001. p. 37.Google Scholar
- CSA. Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Central Statistical Agency, Agricultural sample survey report on livestock characteristic, vol II; 2007/2008. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
- Abilo T, Meseret A. Medical bacteriology for medical laboratory technology. Students: upgraded Lecture note series, University of Gondar, Ethiopia. Gondar: Master Printing Press PLC; 2006. p. 113–4.Google Scholar
- Morag GK. Veterinary laboratory medicine. 2nd ed. London: Black well science; 2002. p. 243–6.Google Scholar
- Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Donnelly WJC, Leonard FC, Maguire D. Veterinary microbiology and microbial diseases. London: Black Well Science; 2002. p. 102–15.Google Scholar
- Inc SPSS. SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2008.Google Scholar
- Gilles F, David C, Van M, Julie P, Bradford P, Robert H, Charles A, Walter M. Bacteriological culture of blood from critically ill neonatal Calves. Can J Vet Med. 1997;61(1):95–100.Google Scholar
- Gossiling J, Mckay KA, Burnumt H. Septicemic colibacillosis of Calves in Ontario. Can Vet J. 1964;5(7):151–60.Google Scholar
- Ghanbarpour R, Mohammad NN. Prevalence of aerobactin and adhesin genes in Escherichia coli isolates from blood of bacteremic severely ill neonatal calves. Vet arhiv. 2010;80(2):185.Google Scholar
- Hirsh DC, Zee YC. Veterinary microbiology. London: Black well science; 1999. p. 65–74.Google Scholar
- Gyles CL, Prescott JF, Songer JG, Thoem CO. Pathogenesis of bacterial infection in animals. 3rd ed. London: Black well publishing; 2004. p. 208–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blood DC. Pocket companion to veterinary medicine. 9th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier science Limited; 2002. p. 158.Google Scholar
- Gupte S. The short text book of medical bacteriology. 8th ed. Chennai: Gipson papers Ltd; 2002. p. 212–9.Google Scholar
- Brooks GFJ, Morce SA. Medical microbiology. 23rd ed. Singapore: International edition; 2004. p. 248–53.Google Scholar
- Thickett B, Mitchell D, Hallows B. Calf rearing. 2nd ed. King’s Lynn: Biddles Ltd; 2003. p. 23–135.Google Scholar