Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Data note
  • Open Access

Primary explant culture and collagen I substrate enhances corneal endothelial cell morphology

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Research Notes201811:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3174-3

  • Received: 8 December 2017
  • Accepted: 12 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objectives

Corneal endothelial cell (CEC) isolation and harvest aim to produce engineered grafts to solve donor corneal tissue shortage. To yield high amounts of CEC maintaining morphological and molecular characteristics, several isolation and culture conditions are reported. Here, we combined direct explant culture, with three different coating conditions and a two-step media approach to compare confluence efficiency, morphology, and specific molecular markers expression.

Data description

Confluence was reached after 2 weeks in the three coating conditions (Matrigel, collagen I, and in uncoated plates) using a two-step approach (proliferative medium without pituitary extract, followed by stabilizer basal medium). Na/K-ATPase and GPC4 markers were detected by immunocytochemistry while GPC4, CD200, and TJP1 by RT-PCR in the three CEC coating culture conditions. CEC in proliferative medium showed spindle morphology in the three conditions. Polygonal morphology was seen in CEC cultures using basal medium under uncoated and collagen I coated plates. CEC cultured in Matrigel-coated plates remained with spindle morphology in basal medium.

Keywords

  • Corneal endothelium
  • Primary cell culture
  • Collagen I

Objective

Corneal endothelial cell (CEC) isolation and harvest aim to produce engineered grafts to solve donor corneal tissue shortage. To yield high amounts of CEC maintaining morphological and molecular characteristics, several isolation and culture conditions are reported. Isolation by enzymatic digestion using collagenase, dispase, and trypsin–EDTA yields high proliferation rates. However, this treatment can decrease the viability of CEC obtained [13]. Culture conditions comprise the use of substrate coated plates and media with different supplementation, including growth factors such as epidermal (EGF), basic fibroblastic (FGFb), neural (NGF), and insulin growth factor (IGF), along with pituitary extract (PE), CaCl2, and ascorbic acid among others, which provides different outcomes in terms of morphology and specific molecular markers expression [3].

This work is focused on the generation of tissue grafts for future corneal endothelium engineering [49]. Preliminary results showed that CEC can proliferate when isolated by enzymatic digestion and using a previously reported supplemented medium containing PE [5, 6, 9]. However, isolation by enzymatic digestion yielded low amounts of viable cells (data not available). In addition, the use of PE and FBS generates uncertainty about the components needed for the control of cell identity and proliferation. To set the best conditions for isolation and harvesting of CEC of rabbits for tissue engineering purposes, we tested the removal of enzymatic digestion using direct explant culture, the two-step media approach that uses a proliferative media without PE, and three different coating conditions (Matrigel, collagen I and no coated plate). We compared the outcomes in terms of confluence efficiency, morphology, and specific molecular markers expression.

Data description

Materials and methods

Six White New Zealand rabbits 3-month-old were sacrificed under general anesthesia with and a lethal intracardiac injection of sodic pentobarbital. A corneoscleral rim excision was made and the conjunctiva was dissected. Lens and aqueous humor were removed and the corneas were obtained. Under sterile conditions, Descemet’s membrane were separated from corneal stroma and rinsed with basal stabilizer medium (SM) containing OptiMEM-I 8% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotics. Corneal endothelia were peeled off from the Descemet’s membrane and a ~ 5 mm2 section was cultured in proliferative medium (PM) containing OptiMEM-I 8% FBS, 20 ng/mL of nerve growth factor (NGF), 5 ng/mL of epidermal growth factor (EGF), 200 µg/L of calcium chloride, 20 µg/mL of ascorbic acid, 0.08% chondroitin sulfate, and antibiotics over Matrigel, collagen I or no coated plate until confluence (~ 90% of the plate showed adherent cells, ~ 15 days). The plates were tripzinised and cultured in SM. Morphological changes were photodocumented. RNA was isolated from CEC cultured in PM and SM. Final point RT-PCRs were made to analyze the expression of the specific CECs markers: glypican-4 (GPC4), tight junction protein 1 (TJP1), and CD200; housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used. Electrophoresis of PCR products was performed on a 2% agarose gel and the bands were photodocumented. Immunocytochemistry was performed to analyze the presence of GPC4 (Abcam, ab150517, Cambridge, UK) and Na/K-ATPase (Abcam, ab176163, Cambridge, UK) in CEC cultured in each condition. Images were obtained with a fluorescence inverted microscope. Detailed description of experimental procedures (rabbit euthanasia, corneal dissection, RNA isolation, RT-PCR parameters, and immunocytochemistry) along with manufacturer information of reagents, equipment, and software is provided in the data repository.

Results

The figure in data file 1 (located in Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5771484.v1) shows representative results of the morphological changes of CEC cultures. CEC cultured for 7 days in PM over Matrigel, collagen I and uncoated plates showed spindle morphology. After medium was replaced using SM, characteristic polygonal morphology of CEC was clearly observed after 48 h in collagen I and uncoated plates. CEC in Matrigel remained with spindle morphology. After cultivation in SM over Matrigel, collagen I, and uncoated plates, CEC expressed GPC4 and Na/K-ATPase. Positive immunocytochemistry results of GPC4 in CEC cultured in collagen I and uncoated plates and Na/K-ATPase in CEC cultured in Matrigel are shown (data file 2, located in Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5771496). CEC cultured with PM over Matrigel and uncoated plates, and CEC cultured in SM over collagen I, Matrigel, and uncoated plates expressed GPC4, CD200, TJP1, and GAPDH (data file 3, located in Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5615449.v9).

In summary, PM (with no pituitary extract) followed by a SM over uncoated and collagen I coated plates promotes CEC proliferation from primary explant, polygonal shape acquisition and the expression of canonical markers of CEC. Matrigel coated plates also promoted CEC proliferation and expression of canonical markers, but failed to allow the acquisition of polygonal shape, which is essential for CEC to be used for corneal engineering purposes.

Limitations

This experiment aimed to provide evidence of the advantage of isolating corneal endothelial cells from direct explant culture using a two-step approach over collagen I and uncoated plates. Shortcomings that prevented the data to be used as part of a full research paper were:
  • Data collection of immunocytochemistry was not possible for all treatments, given the small amount of CEC obtained for each preparation.

  • Data collection of CEC markers expression for RT-PCR in cells cultured in collagen I with proliferative medium was not possible given the small amount of RNA obtained.

  • It was not possible to obtain fresh rabbit corneas to repeat the experiments.

Abbreviations

CEC: 

corneal endothelial cells

GPC4: 

glypican 4

TJP1: 

tight junction protein 1

GAPDH: 

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JZ designed, carried out isolation and culture of cells and immunocytochemistry and acquired part of the data. MDMP and GIGR carried out RNA isolation, RT-PCR, and analyzed immunocytochemistry data. CARB made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the experiment. VT and JEVG revised the manuscript and provided final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data described in this data note can be freely and openly accessed on Figshare. Please see Table 1 and reference list for details and links to the data.
Table 1

Overview of data files/data sets

Label

Name of data file/data set

File types (file extension)

Data repository and identifier (DOI or accession number)

License

Data file 1

Morphological changes of corneal endothelial cells cultured in proliferative and stabilizer media over collagen I, Matrigel and uncoated plates

TIF

Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5771484.v1)

CC-BY 4.0

Data file 2

Immunocytochemistry of GPC4 and ATPase in corneal endothelial cells cultured in stabilizer medium over collagen I, Matrigel and uncoated plates

TIF

Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5771496)

CC-BY 4.0

Data file 3

RT-PCR results for the expression of GPC4, CD200, TJP1, and GAPDH in corneal endothelial cells cultured in stabilizer and proliferative media over collagen I, Matrigel and uncoated plates

TIF

Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5615449.v9)

CC-BY 4.0

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Data citations

  1. 1.
     
  2. 2.

    Zavala, J. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5771496 (2018).

     
  3. 3.
     

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were conducted according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Committee for the Use and Care of Laboratory Animals, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico (Protocol # Re-2016-015).

Funding

This work was funded by endowments from Tecnologico de Monterrey.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Ave. Morones Prieto # 3000, 64710 Monterrey, NL, Mexico
(2)
Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Fundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Universidad de Oviedo, Av. Doctores Fernández Vega # 34, 33012 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

References

  1. Joyce N. Proliferative capacity of corneal endothelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95:16–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mimura T, Joyce N. Replication competence and senescence in central and peripheral human corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1387–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Peh G, Toh K, Wu F, Tan D, Mehta J. Cultivation of human corneal endothelial cells isolated from paired donor corneas. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28310.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Zavala J, Lopez Jaime GR, Rodriguez Barrientos CA, Valdez-Garcia JE. Corneal endothelium: developmental strategies for regeneration. Eye (Lond). 2013;27:579–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Zavala J, Rodriguez-Barrientos CA, Valdez JE. Morphological profile analysis of cultured corneal endothelial cells in Mitogenic/Resting culture system for applications in tissue engineering. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5189.Google Scholar
  6. Rodriguez-Barrientos CA, Kunzevitzky NJ, Bartakova A, Zavala J, Goldberg JL, Valdez JE. Optimization of human corneal endothelial cell morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:1146.Google Scholar
  7. Valdez-García JE, Mendoza G, Zavala J, Zavala-Pompa A, Brito G, Cortés-Ramírez JA, Elisseeff J. In vivo biocompatibility of chitosan and collagen-vitrigel membranes for corneal scaffolding: a comparative analysis. Curr Tissue Eng. 2016;5:123–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Valdez-Garcia JE, Lozano-Ramirez JF, Zavala J. Adult white New Zealand rabbit as suitable model for corneal endothelial engineering. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Rodriguez-Barrientos CA, Zavala J, Treviño V, Aguirre R, Valdez JE. Gene expression profile analysis of cultured corneal endothelial cells in Mitogenic/Resting culture system for applications in tissue engineering. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5187.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement