Skip to main content

Husband’s involvement with mother’s awareness and knowledge of newborn danger signs in facility-based childbirth settings: a cross-sectional study from rural Bangladesh



The aim of this study was to examine the association between husband involvement and maternal awareness and knowledge of newborn danger signs. This cross-sectional study was conducted in three rural hospitals of Bangladesh among the recently delivered women (RDW).


RDW were interviewed to determine their knowledge and understanding of seven key neonatal danger signs. About 51.4% of the respondents were able to identify at least one danger sign. ‘Fever’ was the most correctly identified (43.7%), and hypothermia was the least (26.1%) identified danger sign. The factors associated with RDW possessing knowledge of at least one neonatal danger sign were: secondary education (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6), increased ANC visits (COR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3), previous history of facility delivery (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.4), and husband involvement in the mother’s facility delivery (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.5). RDW were more likely to recall at least one newborn danger sign (AOR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4) when the husband was actively involved in his wife’s antenatal, delivery and postnatal care. In conclusion, this study found that husband involvement was significantly associated with the maternal knowledge related to identification of neonatal danger signs.


Of the estimated 5.9 million under-five deaths in 2015, about 45% of children died in the neonatal period. The highest number of neonatal mortality occurred in South Asia with a neonatal mortality rate (NMR) of 30 per 1000 live births in 2015 [1]. Many countries in this region have a high NMR including Bangladesh with an estimated NMR of 28 per 1000 live births [2]. A child survival revolution has been observed due to the successful implementation of different interventions which have contributed to lower rates of neonatal mortality [3,4,5]. Previous studies found that timely care-seeking is essential during illness to achieve the targeted reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality [6, 7].

Earlier studies estimated that 80% of neonatal deaths are preventable with increased coverage of currently available, evidence-based, and cost-effective measures [8, 9]. In particular, early symptom recognition, appropriate care-seeking, and recognition of danger signs have been identified as cornerstones in neonatal death reduction [10, 11]. As neonates are more prone to express subtle signs of illness [12, 13], it is essential that mothers possess the knowledge needed to identify symptoms. Symptoms such as breathing difficulty, very low or high temperatures, convulsions, feeding problems and less movement are symptoms of the leading causes of neonatal deaths—notably neonatal sepsis, perinatal asphyxia, and prematurity [14].

In a traditional Bangladeshi family, the husband acts as the major decision maker, and the wife and children respect the decisions that are made [15]. Consistent with this family model, Mullany and Thapa found that it was essential to involve husbands when looking to improve the health of pregnant women and their newborns [16, 17]. Other studies that examined the factors associated with maternal ability to identify newborn danger signs weren’t successful at the facility level [18, 19]. The current study investigated the extent to which a mother can recognize the danger signs of newborn illness, and how husband involvement influenced the knowledge level of these women.

Main text

Design and methods

Study design, settings, and participants

This cross-sectional facility-based study was conducted from January to April 2015. The study was carried out in three Upazila (i.e. sub-district) Health Complex (UHC) facilities in the Tangail district of Bangladesh. Each sub-district contains a UHC which is the secondary level referral hospital with a 50 bed inpatient capacity for a catchment area with a population of 300,000–500,000. For this study, we enrolled 142 recently delivered women (RDW) who encountered a normal vaginal delivery (NVD), had a live born baby, and were physically stable. Each mother was accompanied by at least one attendant so that they had someone to care for their babies while they were being interviewed. RDW were interviewed using a structured questionnaire which was administered within 6 h of normal delivery.

Variables and measurements

A wealth quintile was considered based on possession of electronic items or vehicles [19]. The education level of women and their husbands was also taken into consideration. One of the inclusion criteria for the study was to enroll mothers who had at least one other baby or a history of delivery. The seven major danger signs used in this study were those outlined in the National health strategy of Bangladesh and World Health Organization’s (WHO) pocket book of inpatient newborn care [20]. A detailed description of the data collection tool and procedure are given in the Additional file 1.

Statistical analysis

A frequency distribution was used to present the categorical variables. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for continuous variables. This study used logistic regression to identify the association between husband involvement and knowledge of at least one danger sign among the RDW. Stata version 13 (College Station, Texas, USA) was used for data analysis. Crude odds ratio (CORs) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated, and odds ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals.


Participant’s characteristics

The mean age of the participants was 23.7 (± 8.6) years. More than half of the participants were residents of semi-urban areas. Around 64.8% of the participants had received a secondary education, and 62.3% were from households categorized as having a ‘low’ asset ownership. The majority of the interviewees were housewives (71.1%), and around 57.1% of all women had a previous history of hospital delivery (Table 1). Knowledge of ‘hyperthermia (i.e., fever)’ was the most well recognized danger sign, being recognized by 43.7% of the participants. Around 35% of the respondents were able to recall the danger signs of ‘hypothermia’, ‘lethargic’, ‘convulsions’, ‘severe chest indrawing’ and ‘stopped feeding well’ (see Additional file 2).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of study participants

Factors influencing husband’s involvement in facility delivery

As shown in the bivariate logistic regression analysis in Table 2, factors that were significantly associated with the husband’s participation in the facility delivery (secondary outcome variable) included: increased age (COR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–2.1), semi-urban residence (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.5), secondary education (COR: 1.1, 95% CI 1.0–1.3), use of ANC services (COR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3), and previous history of facility delivery (COR: 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.6).

Table 2 Factors associated with husband’s active involvement in facility delivery

Table 2 represents the bi-variable logistic regression only and we did not consider the multivariable analysis. We explored the different factors associated with the husband’s active involvement in taking the decision of facility delivery.

Factors associated with knowledge of newborn danger sign among the RDW

Table 3 describes the factors that were related to the outcome variable (i.e., knowledge of at least one danger sign) of this study. We found associations with secondary education (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6), increased ANC visits (COR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3), previous history of facility delivery (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.4), and husbands involvement in care (COR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.5) with having the maternal knowledge of at least one neonatal danger sign (Table 3). After adjusting for the maternal factors (high parity, ANC attendance, location of residence, occupation, household assets, facility-based delivery and education level), husband involvement (AOR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4) was associated with an increased maternal knowledge of newborn danger signs.

Table 3 Factors associated with knowing at least one danger sign among the RDW


This study found a significant association between husband involvement and maternal knowledge of newborn danger signs. Location of residence, increased maternal age, maternal education and previous history of facility delivery were also found to be associated with increased knowledge of mother in identifying the newborn danger signs. We also found that pregnant women attending two or more ANC appointments demonstrated an increased recall of neonatal danger signs, and husband involvement in these visits was associated with an increased ability to identify the danger signs. A previous study found that ANC visits encourage active birth pre-planning and preparedness [21]. During the antenatal check-up, pregnant women also get the opportunity to learn more about the maternal and newborn danger signs from healthcare professionals [22]. This could explain why increased access to ANC services tends to result in pregnant woman having greater knowledge about neonatal danger signs. It could be argued that mothers who have attended ANC services become motivated to access hospital-based delivery services. Consistent with previous studies in low to middle-income settings, we also found that high levels of education were positively associated with being able to recall at least one danger sign [23,24,25]. This is thought to be due to the higher ability of educated women to be able to understand messages related to health education [23]. Our study found that husband involvement was significantly associated with increased maternal knowledge of neonatal danger signs. This finding is consistent with the systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Yargawa et al. [26], which showed that male or husband involvement in care was significantly associated with positive maternal outcomes [27, 28].

This study found that the correct response to ‘lethargic’ and ‘stopped feeding well’ was given by approximately 38% of the participants. Of the seven danger signs, the least known were ‘hypothermia,’ and ‘fast breathing’. In a study conducted in Pakistan, Khadduri et al. [29] had also identified ‘difficulty feeding’ and ‘fast breathing’ as the least known danger signs amongst a group of new mothers. This low knowledge of hypothermia is cause for concern considering it is a life-threatening condition for newborns. The delay in identification of these lesser known danger signs may be contributing to neonatal mortality and morbidity in low resource settings like Bangladesh [30]. In our study, knowledge on hyperthermia (fever) was found to be the most commonly known danger sign, and the sign was mentioned by 43.7% of the participants. Our findings are similar to other studies conducted in India which found here was a high awareness (75–90%) of ‘hyperthermia’ as a danger sign [31, 32].

More than half of the respondents (RDW) of our study were able to identify at least one key danger sign, and the findings were generally consistent with the results of other low-income settings [33]. The imperfect knowledge of newborn danger signs is one of the leading causes of delay in decision making and care-seeking that is also known as the first delay [34]. Waiswa et al. [35] argue that the first delay is the underlying cause of 50% of all neonatal deaths. However, danger sign identification and recognition by the mother might not always be enough to empower women to decide to access hospital or facility care for their babies in rural settings [10, 36]. The decision to seek care from a hospital for sick neonates may also be sought from elder family members depending on family dynamics. In addition to decision making, previous research identified major constraints like high cost, low socioeconomic status, difficulty in accessing to healthcare services and low literacy levels that may prevent a mother from taking her baby to the hospital [37].

This study identified increased age, semi-urban residence, secondary education, higher use of ANC services and previous history of facility delivery as factors associated with husband involvement in facility delivery. Husband involvement in pregnancy and reproductive health components has long been discussed. Some studies have shown benefits of involving men in reproductive health issues by emphasizing increased utilization of antenatal care and postnatal care that helps a mother in alleviating the stress, pain, and anxiety related to pregnancy and post-partum depression [27, 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. These positive findings can be further explored by conducting in-depth qualitative studies. Moreover, husbands can improve their wives knowledge on self-care and newborn care by providing counseling, health education, and by advising them to practice increased health care seeking behaviour [49]. Our study also revealed that new mothers who got little input from their partners during pregnancy and delivery may have a poorer understanding of neonatal danger signs in comparison to women whose husbands are actively involved.

Finally, the results of our study highlight the vital role of the husband in optimizing the level of knowledge and awareness of the mother with regards to neonatal danger signs. Further longitudinal studies would be required to derive reliable inferences on the husband’s supportive role in the neonatal care-seeking paradigm by the mother and how it precludes neonatal mortality as a result of early identification of danger signs.


The results of this study were based on three sub-district hospitals. Although the participants of this study were roughly representative of the rural population of Bangladesh, the findings may not adequately reflect the actual situation given our sample size. Our sample size was relatively small; however, post hoc calculation determined a high statistical power, which is one of the strengths of this study. Also, the temporality of the association was not established given the cross-sectional design of the study. Despite adjustments for age, location of residence, occupation, education level, parity, household assets, ANC visits and previous facility delivery, there may be some unidentified confounding variables which were not taken into account. This study also did not consider whether the husband’s involvement in maternal care affects the mothers knowledge when mothers are better educated or when they have been trained to recognize the danger signs of neonatal illness.



antenatal care


adjusted odds ratio


crude odds ratio


neonatal mortality rate


Recently Delivered Women


standard deviation


Upazila Health Complex


World Health Organization


  1. 1.

    UN Inter–Agency Group for Child Mortality. Child mortality estimates September 2015. 2015. Accessed 16 Aug 2017.

  2. 2.

    National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. 2016. Accessed 16 Aug 2017.

  3. 3.

    Lawn JE. The child survival revolution: what next? Lancet. 2014;384(9947):931–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Martines J, Paul VK, Bhutta ZA, Koblinsky M, et al. Neonatal survival: a call for action. Lancet. 2005;365(9465):1189–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lawn JE, Cousens S, Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Martines J, Paul V, et al. Why are 4 million newborn babies dying each year? Lancet. 2004;364:399–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    de Silva MA, Wijekoon A, Hornik R, Martines J. Care seeking in Sri Lanka: one possible explanation for low childhood mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(10):1363–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    D’Souza RM. Role of health-seeking behaviour in child mortality in the slums of Karachi, Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci. 2003;35(1):131–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Akseer N, Lawn JE, Keenan W, Konstantopoulos A, Cooper P, Ismail Z, et al. Ending preventable newborn deaths in a generation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:S43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014;384(9940):347–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hill Z, Kendall C, Arthur P, Kirkwood B, Adjei E. Recognizing childhood illnesses and their traditional explanations: exploring options for care-seeking interventions in the context of the IMCI strategy in rural Ghana. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8(7):668–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yoder PS, Hornik RC. Symptoms and perceived severity of illness as predictive of treatment for diarrhea in six Asian and African sites. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(4):429–39.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bang AT, Bang RA, Reddy MH, Baitule SB, Deshmukh MD, Paul VK, et al. Simple clinical criteria to identify sepsis or pneumonia in neonates in the community needing treatment or referral. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(4):335–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Baqui AH, Rahman M, Zaman K, El Arifeen S, Chowdhury HR, Begum N, et al. A population-based study of hospital admission incidence rate and bacterial aetiology of acute lower respiratory infections in children aged less than five years in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(2):179.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Thatte N, Kalter HD, Baqui A, Williams E, Darmstadt GL. Ascertaining causes of neonatal deaths using verbal autopsy: current methods and challenges. J Perinatol. 2009;29(3):187.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Story WT, Burgard SA, Lori JR, Taleb F, Ali NA, Hoque DE. Husbands’ involvement in delivery care utilization in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thapa DK, Niehof A. Women’s autonomy and husbands’ involvement in maternal health care in Nepal. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mullany BC. Barriers to and attitudes towards promoting husbands’ involvement in maternal health in Katmandu, Nepal. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(11):2798–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nigatu SG, Worku AG, Dadi AF. Level of mother’s knowledge about neonatal danger signs and associated factors in North West of Ethiopia: a community-based study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sandberg J, Pettersson KO, Asp G, Kabakyenga J, Agardh A. Inadequate knowledge of neonatal danger signs among recently delivered women in southwestern rural Uganda: a community survey. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e97253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    World Health Organization. Pocket book of hospital care for children: guidelines for the management of common illnesses with limited resources. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Accessed 3 May 2018.

  21. 21.

    McPherson RA, Khadka N, Moore JM, Sharma M. Are birth-preparedness programmes effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha district, Nepal. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24(4):479–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Prata N, Passano P, Sreenivas A, Gerdts CE. Maternal mortality in developing countries: challenges in scaling-up priority interventions. Womens Health (Lond). 2010;6(2):311–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kabakyenga JK, Östergren P-O, Turyakira E, Pettersson KO. Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda. Reprod Health. 2011;8(1):33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pembe AB, Urassa DP, Carlstedt A, Lindmark G, Nyström L, Darj E. Rural Tanzanian women’s awareness of danger signs of obstetric complications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(1):12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mutiso SM, Qureshi Z, Kinuthia J. Birth preparedness among antenatal clients. East Afr Med J. 2008;85(6):275–83.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Redshaw M, Henderson J. Fathers’ engagement in pregnancy and childbirth: evidence from a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schaffer MA, Lia-Hoagberg B. Effects of social support on prenatal care and health behaviors of low-income women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26(4):433–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Khadduri R, Marsh DR, Rasmussen B, Bari A, Nazir R, Darmstadt GL. Household knowledge and practices of newborn and maternal health in Haripur district, Pakistan. J Perinatol. 2008;28(3):182–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kumar V, Shearer JC, Kumar A, Darmstadt GL. Neonatal hypothermia in low resource settings: a review. J Perinatol. 2009;29(6):401–12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dongre AR, Deshmukh PR, Garg BS. Awareness and health care seeking for newborn danger signs among mothers in peri-urban Wardha. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76(7):691–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Awasthi S, Verma T, Agarwal M. Danger signs of neonatal illnesses: perceptions of caregivers and health workers in northern India. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(10):819–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rahman AE, Iqbal A, Hoque DE, Moinuddin M, Zaman SB, Rahman QS, et al. Managing neonatal and early childhood syndromic sepsis in sub-district hospitals in resource poor settings: improvement in quality of care through introduction of a package of interventions in rural Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Barnes-Josiah D, Myntti C, Augustin A. The, “three delays” as a framework for examining maternal mortality in Haiti. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(8):981–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Waiswa P, Kallander K, Peterson S, Tomson G, Pariyo GW. Using the three delays model to understand why newborn babies die in eastern Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(8):964–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zaman SB, Hossain N, Yasir Arafat SM, Sharmin S. Management of Newborn Infection: knowledge and attitude among health care providers of selected sub-district hospitals in Bangladesh. Int J Percept Public Health. 2017;1(2):127–32.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Roth DM, Mbizvo MT. Promoting safe motherhood in the community: the case for strategies that include men. Afr J Reprod Health. 2001;5(2):10–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bielinski-Blattmann D, Lemola S, Jaussi C, Stadlmayr W, Grob A. Postpartum depressive symptoms in the first 17 months after childbirth: the impact of an emotionally supportive partnership. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(5):333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dennis CL, Ross L. Women’s perceptions of partner support and conflict in the development of postpartum depressive symptoms. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(6):588–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gremigni P, Mariani L, Marracino V, Tranquilli AL, Turi A. Partner support and postpartum depressive symptoms. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;32(3):135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Grube M. Inpatient treatment of women with postpartum psychiatric disorders—the role of the male partners. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8(3):163–70.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Al Dallal FH, Grant IN. Postnatal depression among Bahraini women: prevalence of symptoms and psychosocial risk factors. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(5):432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Reid H, Power M, Cheshire K. Factors influencing antenatal depression, anxiety and stress. Br J Midwifery. 2009;17(8):501–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Stapleton LR, Schetter CD, Westling E, Rini C, Glynn LM, Hobel CJ, et al. Perceived partner support in pregnancy predicts lower maternal and infant distress. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(3):453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    D’Aliesio L, Vellone E, Amato E, Alvaro R. The positive effects of father’s attendance to labour and delivery: a quasi experimental study. Int Nurs Perspect. 2009;9(1):5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mekonnen W, Worku A. Determinants of low family planning use and high unmet need in Butajira District, South Central Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2011;8(1):37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yue K, O’Donnell C, Sparks PL. The effect of spousal communication on contraceptive use in Central Terai, Nepal. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(3):402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zaman SB, Hossain N, Hussain MA, Abimanue V, Jahan N, Zaman RB, et al. Factors related to knowledge on newborn danger signs among the recently delivered women in sub-district hospitals of Bangladesh. Public Health Indonesia. 2017;3(2):50–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

SBZ, NH, DMEH conceptualized the study. SBZ, NH, RDG, MMIB developed the methodology and implemented the research in the field. SBZ, RDG, NH, GMAK contributed in data analysis. SBZ, RDG, GMAK, NH, MMIB, DMEH prepared the first draft of the manuscript. DMEH as senior author, guided data analysis, editing and preparing responses of reviewers. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We are grateful to the Hospital Managers (Upazila Health and Family Planning Officer) of the three participated sub-district Hospitals for giving us the permission. We would also like to acknowledge the support of the hospital doctors and nurses for their hospitality, patience, and kindness during the interviews and throughout the process of our data collection. We specially want to thank Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman and Rafid Bin Zaman for their help in proofreading the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data set supporting the conclusions of this article is not included to protect patient confidentiality. However, the data set can be obtained from the authors upon request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Prior permission for data collection was taken from the respective hospital authority. Written consent was received from each participating woman. Each woman was explained about the objective of the study. In case of minor respondents (age < 18 years), written informed consent was taken from the husband/accompanying guardian. Each participant was able to skip any question they weren’t comfortable answering, and were informed of their right to quit interview any time.


There is no source of financing.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sojib Bin Zaman.

Additional files

Additional file 1.

Data collection tool and procedure.

Additional file 2.

Participants correctly identified the neonatal danger signs.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaman, S.B., Gupta, R.D., Al Kibria, G.M. et al. Husband’s involvement with mother’s awareness and knowledge of newborn danger signs in facility-based childbirth settings: a cross-sectional study from rural Bangladesh. BMC Res Notes 11, 286 (2018).

Download citation


  • Husband involvement
  • Knowledge
  • Newborn danger sign
  • Bangladesh