Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among janitors of Mekelle University, North Ethiopia

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Research Notes201811:294

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3399-1

  • Received: 1 November 2017
  • Accepted: 3 May 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among janitors working at Mekelle University, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

Result

The overall prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in the present study were 17.97% (69/384) and 6.25% (24/384) respectively. Although not statistically significant, the prevalence of MRSA among janitors working in the medical area (9.7%, 10/103) was two times higher than the non-medical area (4.9%, 14/281). Janitors who had more service year and who were unable to read and write were found with high isolates of MRSA. Nasal carriage of MRSA among janitors who work in the hospital and who were hospitalized in the last 3 months and those who had exposure to wastes and body fluids were 13 (37.1%) and 10 (38.5%) respectively. Majority of the isolates of S. aureus were sensitive to ciprofloxacin (67; 97%), doxycycline (56; 81%), erythromycin (54; 78%), chloramphenicol (50; 72.5%) and cefoxitin (45; 65.2%). Sixty-seven of the 69 (97%) were resistant to penicillin. Of the 69 isolates of S. aureus, 22 (31.9%) showed multidrug resistant. Fourteen were resistant to three antimicrobials, 2 were resistant to four antimicrobials, and 7 were resistant to five antimicrobials.

Keywords

  • Mekelle University
  • Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  • Janitors
  • Antimicrobial susceptibility tests

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive spherical-shaped bacterium, predominantly colonizes the skin and nasal mucosa of healthy individuals globally [1]. Approximately 28% of healthy adult individuals have their anterior nares persistently colonized with this bacterium (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC172932) [2]. Person to person transmission of S. aureus occurs mostly through contact with fluids from infected skin abrasions [3]. Infections due to S. aureus range from simple skin infections to fatal bacteremia and pneumonia [1]. S. aureus contributes to one-third of surgical site infections and close to a quarter of ventilator-associated pneumonia [4]. Between 2001 and 2009, the S. aureus skin and soft tissue infections associated hospitalization has increased from 39 to 51% in hospitals of USA [5].

With the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) first recognized from hospitalized patients in 1960 [4], the treatment of Staphylococcal infections has become more challenging [5]. Until 1990, could only be described as a hospital-acquired infection [6]. Subsequently, MRSA has become a major global public health problem in both hospitals [69] and community [1013] settings globally. Among hospitals and non-medical janitors in Taiwan, 3.6 and 1.3% have MRSA in their nares respectively [14]. In Pakistan, 13.6% of sanitary and 2.1% administrative workers were found to have MRSA in their nares respectively [15]. The nasal carriage of MRSA among 600 randomly selected health workers in Iran was 5.3% [16].

Thirty-four (28.8%) and 15 (12.7%) healthcare workers in Dessie-Ethiopia had their anterior nares colonized with S. aureus and MRSA respectively [17]. Eighty-five (59%) and 44 (28.9%) in patients in Jimma-Ethiopia had their anterior nares colonized with S. aureus and MRSA respectively [18].

At Mekelle Hospital-Ethiopia, the nasal and hand carriage of MRSA among healthcare workers was 20.3% [19].

In Ethiopia, as to our knowledge, despite its importance, there is no published data that indicates the prevalence of MRSA and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among janitors of any institution.

Therefore, this research project assessed the prevalence of MRSA and its antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among janitors working in Mekelle University; with a view to providing information to aid the design of appropriate prevention strategies.

Main text

Materials and methods

Study area and study design

Mekelle University is one of the largest Universities in Ethiopia. It has more than 30 thousand first-degree, second-degree and third-degree annual students in the five campuses [20]. It conducts teaching, research, and community activities. There are 576 janitors working at Mekelle University (155 from one campus in Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital and 421 from other four campuses of the University. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2016.

Sample size and sampling technique

A total of 384 janitors (103 from medical and 281 from non-medical) were recruited to participate in the study. The sample size was calculated using single proportion formula (P = 0.5, Zα/2 = 0.196, CI = 95). Simple random sampling technique was used to select 384 study participants. Study participants who had nasal bleeding at the time of data collection were excluded because rolling of swab may aggravate bleeding.

Data collection and processing

Trained data collectors were recruited to collect the socio-demographic, clinical and other factors from consenting participants using a standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire could be self-administered (for literate participants) or interview-administer (for participants unable to read and write their mother language).

Sample collection, transport, and processing

Using aseptic procedures, trained study assistants took nasal swab samples from both anterior nares of the study participants which were transported to Mekelle University College of Health Sciences department of medical microbiology laboratory within 30 min of collection. Upon arrival, specimens were inoculated on to Mannitol salt agar (HI Media Laboratories, Pvt. Mumbai, India) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the presence of S. aureus was confirmed by golden yellowish colonies, Gram stain and a biochemical test using slide coagulase test [21, 22].

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests

Isolates identified as S. aureus were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility tests using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method as described by CLSI [23]. Six antimicrobials were used; these were penicillin (10 units), erythromycin (15 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), doxycycline (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and cefoxitin (30 μg). Three to five colonies of S. aureus were picked from the nutrient agar to make a suspension that was standardized to 0.5 McFarland standards. Using sterile applicator cotton swab, standardized suspensions were swabbed on to the Muller Hinton agar. The antimicrobial discs were placed then on the Muller Hinton agar within 20 min using aseptic technique. The Muller Hinton agar plates were incubated at 35 °C for 18 h. After this, the diameter of the “zone of inhibition” around the antibiotic discs was measured using calipers and reported as sensitive, intermediate and resistance [2123].

Methicillin resistance S. aureus was confirmed by 30 μg cefoxitin disc. A “zone of inhibition” of ≤ 21 mm was considered as methicillin-sensitive and a “zone of inhibition” of > 22 as methicillin-resistant.

Quality control

Each lot and shipment of the medium was checked for expiration dates prior to use as part of quality control. The performance of the media and antibiotic discs were evaluated using positive controls (S. aureus, ATCC-25923) and negative controls (Escherichia coli-ATCC-25922) [23].

Statistical analysis

Frequency and percentage were used to summarize categorical data. Chi square statistics were used to describe associations between various participants’ characteristics and Staphylococcus nasal carriage. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05 using the two-tailed method. SPSS for Windows Version 20 software was used for the statistical analysis of the collected data.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences with a proposal number of ERC 0682/2015. Informed consent was collected from each study participants after they understood the aim of the study. As the janitors were outsourced to a private company, permission was collected from the private limited company.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

Three hundred and eighty-four participants were recruited. Their mean age was 21 (± 4.97) years and all (100%) were female. The majority (85.2%; 327) were aged 18–24 years. The majority were single (81.8%), had attained a high school education; grade 9–12 (53.1%) and lived with children aged < 15 years (52.6%).

Majority (63%) had served as a janitor for less than 1 year, in a non-medical area (73.1%), did not suffer from allergic rhinitis (95.3%), had not had a skin infection (97.1%), nor a wound infection (94.8%), nor been hospitalized (64.3%) in the 3 months preceding the interview. The majority (73.2%) reported no history of exposure to waste and body fluids (Table 1).
Table 1

Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, and MSSA among janitors of Mekelle University, 2016

 

Study subjects

N = 384, N (%)

Total S. aureus isolates

N (%), 69 (17.97%)

MRSAa, N = 24

MSSAb, n = 45

P value

N (%)

N (%)

Age

0.708

 18–24

327 (85.2)

59 (18)

20 (33.9)

39 (66.1)

 

 > 24

57 (14.8)

10 (17.5)

4 (40)

6 (60)

 

Sex

 Female

384 (100)

69

24

45

 Male

0 (0)

 

Marital status

0.166

 Single

314 (81.8)

55 (17.5)

22 (40)

33 (60)

 

 Married

52 (13.5)

11 (21.2)

2 (18.2)

9 (81.8)

 

 Divorced

18 (5.7)

3 (16.7)

0

3 (100)

 

Educational status

0.038

 Unable to read and write

25 (6.5)

8 (32)

5 (62.5)

3 (37.5)

 

 Junior secondary school

84 (21.9)

17 (20.2)

8 (47.1)

9 (52.9)

 

 High school

204 (53.4)

33 (16.2)

6 (18.2)

27 (81.8)

 

 Diploma

71 (18.5)

11 (15.5)

5 (45.5)

6 (54.5)

 

Live with children

0.054

 Yes

202 (52.6)

28 (13.9)

6 (21.4)

22 (78.6)

 

 No

182 (47.4)

41 (22.5)

18 (43.9)

23 (56.1)

 

Service as a janitor in year

0.023

 < 1

242 (63)

43 (17.8)

17 (39.5)

26 (60.5)

 

 1–2

109 (28.4)

18 (16.5)

2 (11.1)

16 (88.9)

 

 > 2

33 (8.6)

8 (24.2)

5 (62.5)

3 (37.5)

 

Cleaning area

0.286

 Medical

103 (26.8)

26 (25.2)

10 (38.5)

16 (61.5)

 

 None medical

281 (73.2)

43 (15.3)

14 (32.6)

29 (67.4)

 

Allergic rhinitis disease

0.168

 Yes

18 (4.7)

1 (5.6)

1 (100)

0

 

 No

366 (95.3)

68 (18.6)

23 (33.8)

45 (66.2)

 

Respiratory infection (within last 3 months)

0.168

 Yes

11 (2.9)

1 (9.1)

1 (100)

0

 

 No

373 (97.1)

68 (18.2)

23 (33.8)

45 (66.2)

 

Skin infection (within last 3 months)

0.005

 Yes

11 (2.9)

4 (36.4)

4 (100)

0

 

 No

373 (97.1)

65 (17.4)

20 (30.8)

45 (69.2)

 

Wound present (within last 3 months)

0.938

 Yes

20 (5.2)

6 (30)

2 (33.3)

4 (66.7)

 

 No

364 (94.8)

63 (17.3)

22 (34.9)

41 (65.1)

 

Hospital stay and hospitalization (within 3 months)

0.676

 Yes

137 (35.7)

35 (25.5)

13 (37.1)

22 (62.9)

 

 No

247 (64.3)

34 (13.8)

11 (32.4)

23 (67.6)

 

Exposure to waste and fluids

0.618

 Yes

103 (26.8)

26 (25.2)

10 (38.5)

16 (61.5)

 

 No

281 (73.2)

43 (15.3)

14 (32.6)

29 (67.4)

 

N total isolates of MRSA, n total number of MSSA isolates

aMethicillin resistance S. aureus

bMethicillin sensitive S. aureus

Isolation of S. aureus from participant’s samples

Samples were collected from the anterior nares of all participants; S. aureus was cultured from 69 (17.97%) of the samples. Of the 69 isolates, 25.2% (26/103) were recovered from janitors that worked in medical areas and 15.3% (43/81) from those that worked in non-medical areas of the University (Table 1).

Prevalence of MRSA among janitors working at Mekelle University

Among participants with positive isolates (n = 69), 24 (34.8%) had methicillin resistant S. aureus. Ten of the 26 isolates (38.5%) were among janitors working in medical areas where as 14/43 (32.6%) was working in non-medical areas. The overall prevalence of MRSA was 6.25% (24/384) (Table 1).

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of S. aureus isolates

All the 69 S. aureus isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility tests against seven antimicrobials. Majority of the isolates of S. aureus were sensitive to ciprofloxacin (67; 97%), doxycycline (56; 81%), erythromycin (54; 78%), chloramphenicol (50; 72.5%) and cefoxitin (45; 65.2%). Sixty-seven of the 69 (97%) were resistant to penicillin. About one-third 24 (34.8%) of the isolates were resistant to cefoxitin. Of the 45 methicillin susceptible S. aureus, 2 (4.4%), 5 (11.1%), 6 (13.3%), 6 (13.3%) and 43 (95.6%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and penicillin respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of S. aureus isolates in Mekelle University, 2016

Antimicrobial drugs

S. aureus

Total

P value

MRSA, N = 24

MSSA, n = 45

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

Ciprofloxacin

 Susceptible

24 (100)

43 (95.6)

67 (97.1)

0.295

 Resistance

2 (4.4)

2 (2.9)

 

Doxycycline

 Susceptible

16 (66.7)

40 (88.9)

56 (81.2)

0.025

 Resistance

8 (33.3)

5 (11.1)

13 (18.8)

 

Erythromycin

 Susceptible

15 (62.5)

39 (86.7)

54 (78.3)

0.020

 Resistance

9 (37.5)

6 (13.3)

15 (21.7)

 

Chloramphenicol

 Susceptible

11 (45.8)

39 (86.7)

50 (72.5)

0.000

 Resistance

13 (54.2)

6 (13.3)

19 (27.5)

 

Cefoxitin

 Susceptible

45 (100)

45 (65.2)

 

 Resistance

24 (100)

24 (34.8)

 

Penicillin

 Susceptible

2 (4.4)

2 (2.9)

0.295

 Resistance

24 (100)

43 (95.6)

67 (97.1)

 

MRSA, methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

Multidrug resistance (MDR) isolates of S. aureus

Of the 69 isolates of S. aureus, 22 (31.9%) isolates showed MDR. Fourteen were resistant to three antimicrobials, 2 were resistant to four antimicrobials, and 7 were resistant to five antimicrobials (Table 3).
Table 3

Multidrug-resistance isolates of S. aureus among janitors of Mekelle University, 2016

Number of antimicrobial resistance

Staphylococcus aureus isolates (n = 69)

MDR patterns (n = 22, 31.9%)a

Number of isolates (%)

Three

CIP, Pen, C

1 (1.4)

Fox, Pen, C

5 (17.2)

E, Doxy, Pen

1 (1.4)

Fox, E, Pen

3 (4.3)

Fox, Doxy, Pen

1 (1.4)

Doxy, Pen, C

3 (4.3)

Four

E, Doxy, Pen, C

1 (1.4)

Fox, Doxy, Pen, C

1 (1.4)

Five

Fox, E, Doxy, Pen, C

6 (21.4)

Fox, E, Doxy, CIP, C

1 (1.4)

aFox, cefoxitin (30 μg); C, chloramphenicol (30 μg); Ery, erythromycin (15 μg); Pen, penicillin (10 unit); CIP, ciprofloxacin (1 μg); Dox, doxycycline (30 μg)

Factors associated with MRSA colonization of the anterior nares among janitors at Mekelle University

A significantly higher proportion of participants with S. aureus colonization was found among participants who were unable to read or write compared to those who had attained junior secondary, high school and diploma level education (62.5% vs. 47.1, 18.2, and 45.5% respectively); among participants that had served as janitors for more than 2 years compared to those who had served for less than 1 year and for between one and 2 years (62.5% vs. 39.5% and 11.1% respectively) (Table 1).

Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the nasal swab of one study participants who had allergic rhinitis and was resistant to cefoxitin/methicillin. Nasal carriages of MRSA among janitors who work in the hospital and who were hospitalized in the last 3 months and those who had exposure to wastes and body fluids were 13 (37.1%) and 10 (38.5%) respectively (Table 1).

Discussion

The overall prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in this study were 69 (17.97%) and 24 (6.25%). This is lower than the study carried out among hospital personals in Pakistan [15] and school children and prisoners in Jimma-Ethiopia [3], but similar to the study revealed from healthcare workers in Iran [16].

Staphylococcus aureus was found to be colonized in 26 (25.2%) janitors working in medical and 43 (16%) in non-medical area, whereas MRSA revealed from 10 (9.7%) in medical and 14 (4.9%) non-medical area. This is higher than the study carried out in Taiwan [14]. This may be due to difference in personal hygiene.

Above 85% of the janitors working in the university were youth (18–24 years). The other below 15% was above 24 years and was found to be with high carriage of MRSA 4 (40%). This is comparable with the study among prisoners in Jimma-Ethiopia [3]. Above 70% of the janitor were high school and diploma but high prevalence of MRSA 5 (62.5%, P = 0.038) were revealed among janitors who were unable to read and write in which transmission may be high. This might be due to lack of awareness in using safety measures available in the medical area during work (exposure to wastes) and may have hand nasal contact that can lead to increase the MRSA. About 62% of the participants were served below 1 year as a janitor, however, MRSA carriage was raised among the janitors who served above 2 years 5 (62.5%, P = 0.023).

None of the participants were presented with underlying diseases except eighteen participants with allergic rhinitis and one of whom having allergic rhinitis had MRSA which is not statistically significant. This is different from a study conducted in Taiwan [14]. Janitors were also requested to respond to the occurrence of respiratory infection, skin infection and present of wound, hospital stay and hospitalization in the last 3 months. The carriage rate of MRSA among the janitors having respiratory, skin infection and present with wound were 1 (100%), 4 (100%) and 2 (33.3%) respectively. This is unlike to the study reported from Taiwan [14].

MRSA isolates were 100% resistant to penicillin and cefoxitin which is similar to the study reported from Jimma [3]. 24 (100%), 16 (66.7%), 15 (62.5%), and 11 (45.8%) isolates of MRSA were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol respectively.

Six of the isolates of MRSA (8.6%) were resistant to five antimicrobial drugs and the resistant patterns were cefoxitin/erythromycin/doxycycline/penicillin/chloramphenicol.

Conclusion

Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was isolated from both medical and non-medical area. Even though there was no statistically significant difference, the proportion of MRSA isolated from the medical area was two times higher than the non-medical area. Participants who were unable to write and read and those who have at most service year were presented to acquire more MRSA and have the statistically significant difference.

More than 30% of confirmed MRSA isolates were resistant to most of the antimicrobial drugs tested in the present study; however, no resistance was recorded from ciprofloxacin.

Janitors who were unable to write and, having more services and serving in the hospital should get awareness on the impact of MRSA and its transmission especially in relation to the hospital patients during cleaning of in-patient rooms.

Limitations

This study limited to conduct the MRSA gen as well as some additional antimicrobial agents.

Abbreviations

S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus

MRSA: 

methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus

SPSS: 

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

MDR: 

multidrug resistance

ERC: 

Ethical Review Committee

USA: 

United States of America

CI: 

confidence interval

ATCC: 

American type culture collection

CLSI: 

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AGk, DGH, GKA, and TAM involved in designing of the project, collection of data, data analysis and interpretation, and write up of the manuscript. AGK and DGH designed the study, supervised data collection both on field and in laboratory, and prepared the manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank officials and study participants of the study sites for their cooperation during data collection by providing and/or facilitating the collection of valuable information.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in the published article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was ethically approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Mekelle University College of Health Sciences. Informed consent was collected from each study participants after they understood the aim of the study.

Funding

Mekelle University (CRPO/CHS/015/08).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia

References

  1. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA. Medical microbiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2013. p. 332–3.Google Scholar
  2. DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010;375(9725):1557–68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kejela T, Bacha K. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among primary school children and prisoners in Jimma Town, Southwest Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013;12:11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2006–2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(11):998–1008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Suaya JA, Mera RM, Cassidy A, Hara PO, Amrine-Madsen H, Burstin S, Miller LG. Incidence and cost of hospitalizations associated with Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in the United States from 2001 through 2009. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:296.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Sabra SM, Abdel-Fattah MM. Epidemiological and microbiological profile of nosocomial infection in Taif Hospitals, KSA (2010–2011). World J Med Sci. 2012;7(1):1–9.Google Scholar
  7. Mulul W, Kibru G, Beyene G, Meku D. Postoperative nosocomial infections and antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacteria isolates among patients admitted at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahirdar, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2012;22:7–17.Google Scholar
  8. Iyer AP, Baghallab I, Albaik M, Kumosani T. Nosocomial infections in Saudi Arabia caused by methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Clin Microbial. 2014;3:3.Google Scholar
  9. Cornejo-Juarez P, Vilar-Compte D, Perez-Jimenez C, Namendys-Silva SA, Sandoval-Hernandez S, Volkow-Fernandez P. The impact of hospital-acquired infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria in an oncology intensive care unit. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;31:31–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ray GT, Suaya JA, Baxter R. Incidence, microbiology, and patient characteristics of skin and soft-tissue infections in a US population: a retrospective population-based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:252.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen C, Huang Y. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005;38:376–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mongkolrattanotha K, Daum RS. Impact of community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on management of the skin and soft tissue infections in children. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2005;7:381–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Adler A, Givon-Lavi N, Moses AE, Block C, Dagan R. Carriage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a cohort of infants in Southern Israel: risk factors and molecular features. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(2):531–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang CJ, Chen NC, Lao CK, Huang YC. Nasal Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus carriage among janitors working in hospitals in Northern Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):1–11.Google Scholar
  15. Rashid Z, Farzana K, Sattar A, Murtaza G. Prevalence of nasal Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital personnel and associated risk factors. Acta Poloniae Pharm Drug Res. 2012;69(5):985–91.Google Scholar
  16. Askarian M, Zeinalzadeh A, Japoni A, Alborzi A, Memish ZA. Prevalence of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern in healthcare workers at Namazi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:241–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shibabaw A, Abebe T, Mihret A. Nasal carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Dessie Referral Hospital Health Care Workers; Dessie, Northeast Ethiopia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2013;2:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Balta B, Derbie F. Nasal carriage of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains among inpatients of Jimma Hospital, South Western Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2003;13(2):107–16.Google Scholar
  19. Gebreyesus A, Gebre-Selassie S, Mihert A. Nasal and hand carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among health care workers in Mekelle Hospital, North Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2013;51:41–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. The performance of Mekelle University in 2014/2015, Annual report; 2015.Google Scholar
  21. Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 179–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC. Color atlas and text book of diagnostic microbiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p. 171–241.Google Scholar
  23. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI approved standard M100-S23. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement