Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Recommendations for application of Haemophilus influenzae PCR diagnostics to respiratory specimens for children living in northern Australia: a retrospective re-analysis

BMC Research Notes201811:323

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3429-z

  • Received: 17 October 2017
  • Accepted: 10 May 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

Haemophilus haemolyticus can be misidentified as nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) due to their phenotypic similarities in microbiological culture. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of misidentified NTHi in respiratory specimens from children living in northern Australia.

Results

Among respiratory specimens collected in studies between 2010 and 2013, retrospective PCR analysis found that routine culture misidentified H. haemolyticus as NTHi in 0.3% (3/879) of nasal specimens, 25% (14/55) of bronchoalveolar lavage and 40% (12/30) of throat specimens. Therefore, in this population, PCR-based NTHi diagnostics are indicated for throat and bronchoalveolar specimens, but not for nasal specimens.

Keywords

  • Haemophilus haemolyticus (Hh)
  • Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi)
  • Nasopharynx, bronchoalveolar lavage

Introduction

Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) disease represents a major global health burden [1]. NTHi are among the most common pathogens identified in the lower airways of patients with chronic lung disease; for example, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in which up to 90% of acute exacerbations are associated with NTHi [1]. NTHi are also commonly found in children with otitis media (55–90%), bacterial conjunctivitis (44–68%) and 41% bacterial sinusitis (41%) [1]. In remote areas of northern Australia, recent cross-sectional data show NTHi in the nasopharynx of 70% young Indigenous children [2]. In this region, NTHi is the dominant pathogen cultured from the middle ear of children with tympanic membrane perforation [3], and the lungs of children with bronchiectasis [4]. By culture, NTHi from these sites are phenotypically indistinguishable from non-haemolytic strains of the typically commensal H. haemolyticus (Hh) [5, 6]. DNA-based methods are required to accurately distinguish NTHi from Hh, and several retrospective studies of presumptive NTHi isolates reported varying rates (0–27%) of reclassification of NTHi as Hh [68]. Whilst identifying Hh as a bacteria associated with an infection may not change immediate clinical treatment, understanding the proportion of misidentified NTHi in respiratory samples is important to accurately describe the burden of respiratory disease attributable to NTHi and potentially Hh.

Our aim was to determine the prevalence of misidentified NTHi in 773 specimens from the nasopharynx or nose, ear discharge, throat, and lower airways from 665 children (< 10 years of age) in northern Australia, and to determine the utility of NTHi PCR diagnostics for our future studies.

Main text

Methods

Choice of specimens tested

Our collection of presumptive NTHi isolates (stored at −80 °C) were originally cultured from nasopharyngeal or nasal (Np), ear discharge (ED), throat, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens collected from children < 10 years of age living in the north of Australia. All children had participated in previous (2010–2013) cross-sectional studies [2, 4, 9] or a randomised controlled trial [10] (Table 1). The studies providing isolates were purposefully chosen to ensure the isolates from the existing NTHi collection represented a broad age range (0–10 years). Isolates were restricted to collection years 2010–2013 to reduce time dependent bias. In the original studies, culture was performed using standard methods as previously described [3]. Briefly, up to four presumptive NTHi isolates from each specimen were selected on the basis of colony morphology (greyish, transparent, smooth colonies) on chocolate agar and bacitracin–vancomycin–clindamycin–chocolate agar. The isolates were confirmed as presumptive NTHi if hemin and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (X and V factor) dependent (Oxoid) and coagglutination negative [Haemophilus Phadebact (10557512, Remel)]. From 773 NTHi-positive specimens (Table 1), 985 isolates were further scrutinised. Of these 773 specimens, 179 (23%) contributed multiple isolates (between 2 and 4, totalling 391 isolates). Inclusion criteria: specimens collected between 2010 and 2013 in the studies outlined in Table 1 where the participant was of north Australian residence and specimens had at least one presumptive NTHi isolate. No other exclusion criteria were applied. Due to use of a combination of longitudinal and cross-sectional collections, these are only an indication of Hh prevalence.
Table 1

Source of specimens

Study

Age

Study type

Collection years

Location

Aboriginal or Non-aboriginal

Children in original study (number NTHi +ve)

Number of children NTHi +ve children included in analysis

Specimen type

Number phenotypic NTHi +ve specimens

Aa

0–6 years

Cross-sectional

2012

Urban

Both

564

(185)

173

Np

172

ED

1

B [2]

0–3 years

Cross-sectional

2010–2012

Remote

Aboriginal

444

(328)

313

Np

308

ED

5

C [2]

5–8 years

Cross-sectional

2010–2012

Remote

Aboriginal

138

(133)

80

N

78

ED

4

D [10]

0–7 months

RCT cohort

2011–2013

Remote

Aboriginal

63

(57)

57

Np

132

ED

5

E [4]

0–10 years

Cross-sectional

2011–2013

Urban and remote

Both

69

(42)

42

Np

22

BAL

30

Throat

16

       

Total = 665

 

Total = 773

Np nasopharynx/nasal, ED ear discharge, BAL bronchoalveolar lavage

aStudy A: unpublished

PCR methods and assays

Samples were prepared for PCR using a colony lysis method; 1–2 colonies from a subculture of each original NTHi isolate were suspended in 200 μl of sterile water, heated at 100 °C for 10 min, cooled on ice, and centrifuged at 12,000 RPM for 2 min to pellet any cellular debris. We used a Haemophilus protein D (hpd)-based PCR assay employing high resolution melt (PCR-HRM; Rotorgene 6000, Corbett Life Science) to discriminate between NTHi and Hh based upon key single nucleotide polymorphisms as described in detail previously [11]. Briefly, the PCR mix comprised 5 µl of Bioline 2 × SensiMix SYBR Green (QT650-02), 100 nM each of forward and reverse primer, and 1 µl of sample supernatant to a total of 10 µl per reaction. Analysis of the HRM was performed on the Rotorgene software (version 1.7). ATCC strains 19418 and 49274 were used as NTHi controls and ATCC 33390 as the Hh control. Samples were genotyped (NTHi or Hh) according to their melt curve profile relative to the NTHi or Hh controls. All isolates were run in duplicate, and repeated if amplification curves were not within 0.5 cycles of each other. Isolates that did not amplify by hpd based PCR were subsequently confirmed as NTHi using a fucP-based PCR [12]. PCR assays were performed by laboratory staff who were blinded to the identity, age and location of the participants.

We assessed the percent of phenotypic NTHi isolates genotyped as NTHi, Hh or equivocal (unable to be genotyped), the percent of specimens with had concurrent carriage of both and the percent of specimens requiring reclassification (Table 2). Specimens were reclassified as Hh if all isolates tested (up to four per specimen) were shown to be Hh by PCR-HRM. Data from the five studies were analysed collectively with stratification by the anatomical site of specimen collection. Reclassification isolate and specimen proportions were compared across anatomical sample sites, age group and dwelling (remote versus urban) using the Chi square test (STATA14; StataCorp, USA).
Table 2

Proportion of NTHi reclassified as Hh, according to specimen type

Specimen type

No. phenotypic NTHI +ve specimens

No specimens with multiple NTHi scrutinised

No. of phenotypic NTHi isolates tested

No. isolates NTHi by HRM (%)

No. isolates reclassified Hh by HRM (%)

No. isolates equivocala by HRM (%)

No. specimens with concurrent NTHi and Hh by HRM (%)b

No. specimens reclassified Hh by HRM (%)

Np

712

153

879

817 (93)

3 (0.34)

59 (7)

1/153 (1)

2 (0.3)

Ear discharge

15

5

21

21 (100)

0

0

0

0

BAL

30

15

55

34 (62)

14 (25)

7 (13)

7/15 (47)

2 (7)

Throat

16

8

30

15 (50)

12 (40)

3 (10)

2/8 (25)

7 (44)

Total

773

179

985

887 (90)

29 (3)

69 (7)

9/179 (5)

11 (1)

aFail to amplify in PCR-HRM

bDenominator no. specimens with multiple NTHi scrutinised

Results and discussion

Three phenotypic NTHi Np isolates (0.34%, 3/879) and none of the ED isolates (0%, 0/21) were reclassified as Hh by PCR-HRM (Table 2). The three reclassified Hh isolates were from three separate Np specimens, one from each of studies A, C and E. There were too few reclassifications for a valid statistical comparison by the subgroups dwelling and age (Table 3). These very low Hh proportions among Np NTHi isolates are in contrast to an American study [6] of children in day care in which 27.3% of 44 Np NTHi isolates were reclassified as Hh. In a Western Australian (WA) study of 122 children with recurrent otitis media undergoing grommet insertion surgery and 17 healthy controls, (266 isolates in total) 20.5 and 11.8% of Np presumptive NTHi isolates were reclassified by 16s rRNA PCR as Hh, respectively [8]. However only 3.6% (4/110) of otitis prone and 0% of healthy control Np specimens were reclassified as having Hh-only. Differences in results could be real, or accounted for by multiple factors, such as geographic location, season, age, ethnicity, disease severity and density of Np colonisation, or speciation methodology. All studies included children < 36 months. Neither ethnicity nor remoteness was reported in the WA or American cohorts. The Indigenous children in our studies (B, C and D) are at high risk of otitis media and have NTHi Np carriage rates of over 70% for most of their early childhood [2]. In this population the Hh may not be competitive, and therefore absent or not detected, in the Np.
Table 3

Reclassification of isolates and specimens as Hh by the subgroups age and dwelling

Specimen type

Subgroup

 

Hh isolate reclassification, n (%)

p value

Hh specimen reclassification, n (%)

p value

Np

Agea

≤1

0/275 (0)

 

0/218 (0)

 

Isolates, n = 879

 

>1–3

1/413 (0.2)

0.414

0/334 (0)

NA

Specimen, n = 712

 

>3–10

2/191 (1)

0.089

2/160 (1)

0.098

 

Dwelling

Urban

1/193 (0.2)

0.633

1/174 (0.6)

0.400

  

Remote

2/686 (0.3)

 

1/538 (0.2)

 

BAL

Age

≤1

   

Isolates, n = 55

 

>1–3

13/44 (30)

0.164

2/24 (8)

0.464

Specimen, n = 30

 

>3–10

1/11 (9)

 

0/6 (0)

 
 

Dwelling

Urban

5/10 (50)

0.049

0/4 (0)

0.556

  

Remote

9/45 (20)

 

2/26 (8)

 

Throat

Age

≤1

  

Isolate, n = 30

 

>1–3

8/23 (35)

0.290

4/11 (36)

0.377

Specimen, n = 16

 

>3–10

4/7 (57)

 

3/5 (60)

 
 

Dwelling

Urban

5/6 (83)

0.015

2/3 (66)

0.375

  

Remote

7/24 (29)

 

5/13(38)

 

aAge p values referenced to ≤ 1

In contrast to the Np, significantly more BAL (25%, 14/55, p < 0.001) and throat (40%, 12/30; p < 0.001) isolates were reclassified as Hh. Throat specimens were less likely to be mixed (NTHi and Hh) and significantly more likely than BAL (7/16, 44% versus 2/30, 7%) to be reclassified as Hh-only (p = 0.003). These specimens were collected from children with a history of lung disease, and the higher Hh proportion in BAL specimens is consistent with that described in American adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (39.5% of sputum isolates were Hh) [6]. For both BAL and throat specimens there was no significant difference in Hh prevalence by age group (BAL p = 0.464; throat p = 0.377), although there were no BAL nor throat samples from children aged ≤ 1 year. In contrast to Np data, NTHi isolates from both the BAL and throat of urban children were significantly more likely be to be reclassified as Hh compared to remote children, p = 0.049 and 0.015 respectively (Table 3). This did not remain significant at the specimen level (BAL p = 0.556; throat p = 0.375), due to high proportion of BAL and throat specimens with both NTHi and Hh.

A small proportion (69/985, 7%) of isolates from Np, BAL and throat specimens failed to amplify in the hpd-based PCR-HRM (Table 2). This was presumably due to considerable variation or absence of the hpd gene as shown previously [13]. In one study up to 13% of Np and disease-related NTHi isolates were shown to be missing the hpd gene by whole genome sequencing [13]. This has potential implications for the efficacy of the pneumococcal H. influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV10) against H. influenzae, and for hpd-based diagnostics.

In conclusion, Hh prevalence varied markedly among respiratory specimen types. Our data support a recommendation for DNA-based discrimination of NTHi and Hh for throat and BAL isolates, however, the low prevalence of Hh in nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs (0.34% of presumptive NTHi) suggests that PCR discrimination is not routinely required for these specimens in this population. As the prevalence of Hh in other settings differs, population-specific recommendations for discrimination of Hh and NTHi are required to accurately determine the burden of disease attributable to NTHi. Multiple colony testing is recommended for throat and lung specimens as mixed NTHi and Hh populations can be expected.

Limitations

We have identified a wide variation in Hh prevalence between our studies and those reported. Due to low rates of positivity we do not recommend hpd based PCR methods for discrimination of NTHi and Hh in the Np in this population. Larger studies should be conducted to clarify best application of PCR methods for clinical specimens from the middle ear, lung and throat. It is unclear why Hh reclassification was concordant among lung specimens across studies, yet discordant among nasopharyngeal specimens. Differences in methodology (16S rRNA PCR [6, 8] in combination with MLST and DNA hybridisation [6], PCR-HRM [11]) may have contributed. Geographic location, remoteness of dwelling, variation in NTHi carriage and density and ethnicity could also contribute to this difference.

Abbreviations

NTHi: 

non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae

Hh: 

Haemophilus haemolyticus

Np: 

nasopharynx/nasal

ED: 

ear discharge

BAL: 

bronchoalveolar lavage

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

NT: 

Northern Territory

PCR-HRM: 

polymerase chain reaction high resolution melt

MLST: 

multi locus sequence testing

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JB conceived the study, compiled and analysed the data, performed laboratory work and drafted the manuscript. ABC and AJL contributed to the acquisition of data. HSV, MJB, and RLM contributed to interpretation of the data. All authors contributed to the intellectual content of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the families who participated in these studies, and the Menzies Child Health Respiratory and Ear Health Research Program for collection of original specimens. Thanks to Koby Scarff for the laboratory support.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the study are available from the corresponding author subject to necessary approvals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All studies included were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research and/or the Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee when appropriate. Analyses performed in this study were under approvals 07-85 and 07-63. Samples from each child were collected after written informed consent was obtained from the child’s parent or guardian.

Funding

The original studies were funded by NHMRC Grants (GNT436023, GNT545232, GNT1040830, and GNT605810) and GlaxoSmithKline. Neither the NHMRC nor GlaxoSmithKline had any input into study design or manuscript preparation. HSV is supported by a Fellowship under the NHMRC-funded HOT NORTH collaboration (GNT1131932). MJB and RLM are supported by NHMRC Early Career Fellowships (GNT1088733, GNT1034703). AJL is supported by a NHMRC Research Fellowship (GNT1020561). ABC is funded by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (1058213).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia
(2)
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, PO Box 3474, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia
(3)
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

References

  1. Van Eldere J, Slack MP, Ladhani S, Cripps AW. Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, an under-recognised pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(12):1281–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70734-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leach AJ, Wigger C, Beissbarth J, Woltring D, Andrews R, Chatfield MD, et al. General health, otitis media, nasopharyngeal carriage and middle ear microbiology in Northern Territory Aboriginal children vaccinated during consecutive periods of 10-valent or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;86:224–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith-Vaughan HC, Binks MJ, Marsh RL, Kaestli M, Ward L, Hare KM, et al. Dominance of Haemophilus influenzae in ear discharge from Indigenous Australian children with acute otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2013;13(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-13-12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hare KM, Grimwood K, Leach AJ, Smith-Vaughan H, Torzillo PJ, Morris PS, et al. Respiratory bacterial pathogens in the nasopharynx and lower airways of Australian indigenous children with bronchiectasis. J Pediatr. 2010;157(6):1001–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.06.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sethi S, Murphy TF. Bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2000: a state-of-the-art review. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(2):336–63. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.2.336-363.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Murphy TF, Brauer AL, Sethi S, Kilian M, Cai X, Lesse AJ. Haemophilus haemolyticus: a human respiratory tract commensal to be distinguished from Haemophilus influenzae. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(1):81–9. https://doi.org/10.1086/509824.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang B, Kunde D, Tristram S. Haemophilus haemolyticus is infrequently misidentified as Haemophilus influenzae in diagnostic specimens in Australia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;80(4):272–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.08.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirkham LA, Wiertsema SP, Mowe EN, Bowman JM, Riley TV, Richmond PC. Nasopharyngeal carriage of Haemophilus haemolyticus in otitis-prone and healthy children. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(7):2557–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00069-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Leach AJ, Wigger C, Andrews R, Chatfield M, Smith-Vaughan H, Morris PS. Otitis media in children vaccinated during consecutive 7-valent or 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination schedules. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Leach AJ, Mulholland EK, Santosham M, Torzillo PJ, Brown NJ, McIntyre P, et al. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines PREVenar13 and SynflorIX in sequence or alone in high-risk Indigenous infants (PREV-IX_COMBO): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e007247. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007247.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Pickering J, Binks MJ, Beissbarth J, Hare KM, Kirkham LA, Smith-Vaughan H. A PCR-high-resolution melt assay for rapid differentiation of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus haemolyticus. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(2):663–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02191-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Price EP, Sarovich DS, Nosworthy E, Beissbarth J, Marsh RL, Pickering J, et al. Haemophilus influenzae: using comparative genomics to accurately identify a highly recombinogenic human pathogen. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:641. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1857-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith-Vaughan HC, Chang AB, Sarovich DS, Marsh RL, Grimwood K, Leach AJ, et al. Absence of an important vaccine and diagnostic target in carriage- and disease-related nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(2):250–2. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00632-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement