Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Reasons and predictors for antiretroviral therapy change among HIV-infected adults at South West Ethiopia

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 4
BMC Research Notes201811:351

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3470-y

©  The Author(s) 2018

  • Received: 8 November 2017
  • Accepted: 1 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

This retrospective cohort study is aimed to assess reasons and predictors of regimen change from initial highly active antiretroviral therapy among 1533 Human Immunodeficiency virus-infected adult patients at the Jimma University Tertiary Hospital.

Results

One in two (47.7%) adults changed their antiretroviral therapy regimen. Patients who were above the primary level of education [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.241 (95% CI 1.070–1.440)] and with human immunodeficiency virus/tuberculosis co-infection [HR 1.405 (95% CI 1.156–1.708)] had the higher risk of regimen change than their comparator. Individuals on Efavirenz [HR 0.675 (95% CI 0.553–0.825)] and non-stavudine [HR 0.494 (95% CI 0.406–0.601)] based regimens had lower risk of regimen change.

Keywords

  • Regimen change
  • Risk factors
  • Initial highly active antiretroviral therapy
  • Ethiopia

Introduction

Globally, the number of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reached 38.8 million in 2015 [1]. In Ethiopia, there were 786,040 HIV-infected people, 39,140 new HIV infections and 28,650 human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) related deaths in 2015 [1].

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to a major reduction of HIV related morbidity and mortality [2–4]. These optimum clinical and public health achievements of antiretroviral therapy (ART) require consistent long-term adherence [5]. Currently, ART regimen changes become a big challenge and cause diminishing the clinical and immunological benefit of treatment [6, 7], failing virological suppression, increase drug resistance [8] and increase mortality and morbidity due to HIV/AIDS [8, 9].

In Africa, the magnitude of regimen change in 2009–2012 was between 13.7 and 57.4% [10, 11] and in Ethiopia, it was between 9.8 and 31.4% in 2012 and 2014 [12]. Beyond access to HAART, the long-term successes of treatment programs in resource-limited settings depend on patient retention on therapy.

The reasons and risk factors for HAART regimen changes have been assessed by studies from resource-rich and resource-limited settings [13–17]. Similarly, in Ethiopia, some studies determined factors contributed to ART regimen change [12, 18]. However, the previous studies that assessed either the prevalence [12, 18] or factors [12, 18–22] for regimen change were all from the northern part of the country. In this study, we assessed reasons and risk factors for the initial HAART regimen changed among patients who started HAART as part of routine clinical care at Jimma University Tertiary Hospital [JUTH].

Main text

Methods

Study design, settings, and participants

A retrospective data from 1533 treatment-naïve adult patients who first received HAART from 2006 to June 2014 at ART clinic of JUTH, Southwest Ethiopia, was analyzed. The treatment protocol for Ethiopia is implemented using World Health Organization (WHO) ART treatment guideline for HIV infection in adults and adolescents [23] and national guidelines for HIV prevention, care, and treatment: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia [24]. According to the current treatment guidelines, HIV-infected adults are eligible to start ART if their Cluster of differentiation 4 cell (CD4cell) count is ≤ 500 cells/mm3 irrespective of the CD4 cell count and WHO clinical stage. Breastfeeding women, pregnant women, and serodiscordant couples can start ART irrespective of WHO clinical stages and CD4 cell count.

Data collection techniques and data quality control

A standard checklist containing study variables were developed from the patient registry card which was developed by the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). During data collection, the most recent laboratory results before starting ART were generally used as baseline values. Pregnant women initiated ART for prevention of mother to child transmission (PMCT) and transfer-in patients were excluded from the study. Death, transferred out and unrecorded outcome variables would be excluded from complete case analysis.

Study variables and measurements

Survival time was measured from the start of ART and ended at the time of regimen changed or when patients were censored. Regimen change refers to both medication modification (i.e. Patients who had modified one or two ART from the three ART regimens) and discontinuation (i.e. Patients who had stopped all regimens at once). Lost to follow up (LTFU) (i.e. Patients who had missed at least three appointments, but had not yet been classified as dead or transferred), and defaulters (i.e. Patients who had missed less than three clinical appointments, but had not yet been classified as dead or transferred) were censored.

The independent variables include: age, sex, marital status, past opportunistic infection, tuberculosis (Tb) status, baseline functional status, educational status, initial CD4 count, and WHO clinical stages. Educational status was categorized into below (1–8 grade) and above (> 9 grade) primary level education. Functional status was classified into the following categories: working (i.e. the ability to perform usual work in and out of the house), ambulatory (i.e. the ability to perform activities of daily living), and bedridden (i.e. not able to perform activities of daily living).

Statistical analyses

The collected data were cleaned, categorized, coded, entered and analyzed by using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 16. The probability of HAART regimen changes was estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. We applied Cox-proportional hazards regression to identify risk factors associated with outcome variable (time of regimen change). Variables found to be associated with the outcome in the univariate analysis assuming a significance threshold of 20% were included in the multivariate analysis. The multivariate analysis results showed a significant effect on the outcome considering the significance thresholds of 5% were described.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from Ethical clearance board of Jimma University and data access permission was obtained from the medical director of JUTH. We simply extracted anonymized data from the patient’s medical registry and no participant was involved in the study.

Results

Characteristics of study participants

A total of 1533 naive patients who started ART with at least one follow-up visit were included for complete case analysis, of which 963 (62.8%) were females. Socio-demographics, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on ART at JUTH, Ethiopia 2015

Baseline characteristics

N (%)

Age (years), [interquartile range (IQR)]

30 (26–38)

Sex

 Female

963 (62.8)

 Male

570 (37.2)

Marital status

 In relationship

733 (47.8)

 Not in relationship

798 (52.0)

 Missing values

2

Educational status

 < primary level education

835 (54.5)

 ≥ primary level education

698 (45.5)

Functional status

 Working

1058 (69.0)

 Ambulatory

394 (25.7)

 Bedridden

63 (4.1)

 Missing values

18 (1.2)

Initial CD4

Median (IQR) in cells/mm3

144 (IQR 79–210)

  ≤ 200

1102 (71.8)

  > 200

429 (28)

 Missing values

2

WHO clinical stages

 Stage I

290 (18.9)

 Stage II

436 (28.4)

 Stage III

648 (42.3)

 Stage IV

159 (10.4)

Past opportunistic infections

 Yes

1183 (77.2)

 No

342 (22.3)

 Missing values

8

TB status

 Negative

1207 (78.7)

 Positive

281 (18.3)

 Missing values

45 (2.9)

NNRTIs

 NVP-based

1056 (68.9)

 EFV-based

477 (31.1)

NRTIs

 D4T-based

942 (61.4)

 TDF-based

338 (22.0)

 ZDV-based

253 (16.5)

WHO clinical stage I indicates asymptomatic and persistent generalized lymphadenopathy; WHO clinical Stage 3 was defined if one of the following is present: weight loss of > 10% body weight, chronic diarrhea for > 1 month, fever for > 1 month, oral candidiasis, or pulmonary Tb within the previous year, or severe bacterial infections; WHO clinical Stage 4 was defined if one of the following is present in an HIV diagnosed patient: HIV wasting syndrome, (Pneumocystcarini pneumonia)PCP, toxoplasmosis of the brain, cryptosporidiosis with diarrhea for > 1 month, cytomegalovirus disease, herpes simplex virus infection, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, candidiasis, extra-pulmonary Tb, lymphoma, kaposi’s sarcoma

NNRTIs non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NRTIs nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NVP Nevirapine, EFV Efavirenz, D4T Stavudine, TDF Tenofovir, ZDV Zidovudine

Prevalence and trends of ART regimen change

Patients were followed for a total of 4546.85 PY with a median follow up of 54.20 (95% CI 51.012–57.388) months. In total, 731 (47.7%) had regimen changed corresponding to an overall incidence rate of 16.08 (95% CI 14.94–17.27) per 100 PY. The number of defaulters and LTFU adult patients were 239 (15.60%) and 107 (6.98%), respectively. Of the 731 adults who had regimen changed, 640 (87.55%) were modifications and 91 (12.45%) were discontinuations. The median time from ART initiation to regimen change was 24.37 (95% CI 21.463–27.204) months.

Kaplan–Meier estimates of the overall probabilities of regimen change at 3-month and 1-year for the cohort were 8.1% (7.4–8.8%) and 16.6% (15.6–17.6%), respectively. The next 2- and 3-year probabilities of regimen changes were 24.2% (95% CI 23.1–25.3%) and 31.2% (95% CI 30–32.4%), respectively.

Drug toxicities were the predominant reasons [n = 431 (58.96%)] for ART regimens changed. Among documented toxicities: 82 (61.19%) were fat changes, 30 (22.38%) were peripheral neuropathies, 14 (10.45%) were anemic, 5 (3.73%) were central nervous system (CNS) toxicities and one hepatotoxicity.

A new TB treatment [n = 120 (16.42%)], planning pregnancy or being pregnant [n = 29 (3.96%)] and treatment failure [n = 24 (3.28%)] were the other reasons for regimens changed. Others (n = 127) had no documented reason for regimen changed.

Predictors for ART regimen change

The results from the multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis found patients who were above the primary level of education [HR 1.241 (1.070–1.440)] and with HIV/TB co-infection [HR 1.405 (1.156–1.708)] had a higher risk of regimen change than their comparator as shown in Table 2. Patients on EFV-based regimens [HR 0.675 (95% CI 0.553–0.825)] and non-D4T based regimens [HR 0.494 (0.406–0.601)] had the lower hazard of change than NVP and D4T based regimens, respectively.
Table 2

Hazard ratios (95% CI) for ART regimens change among HIV infected adult patients at JUTH, Ethiopia, 2015

Variables

Unadjusted HR (95% CI)

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

Educational status

 Below primary level education

1

1

 Above primary level education

1.209 (1.046–1.398)

1.241 (1.070–1.440)

TB status

 Negative

1

1

 Positive

1.356 (1.126–1.633)

1.405 (1.156–1.708)

Functional status

 Working

1

1

 Ambulatory

1.196 (1.017–1.408)

1.169 (0.987–1.385)

 Bedridden

1.428 (1.020–1.998)

1.369 (0.972–1.929)

Initial CD4

 ≤ 200

1

1

 > 200

0.850 (0.719–1.005)

0.923 (0.777–1.097)

NNRTIs-based

 NVP based

1

1

 EFV based

0.736 (0.605–0.895)

0.675 (0.553–0.825)

NRTIs-based

 D4T based

1

1

 Non-D4T based

0.507 (0.418–0.615)

0.494 (0.406–0.601)

Discussion

Regimen change affects the success of the treatments to achieve United Nations Program on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDs) goals [25]. Near to one in two (47.7%), individuals changed their regimen in this present study. The regimen change rate found in the current study is higher than findings elsewhere in Ethiopia [12, 26]. It is also higher when compared to other cohort studies in Uganda (39.21%) [27] and Nigeria (28%) [28]. However, cohort studies from resource-rich countries like UK, Italy, and Brazil showed higher incidence rates of regimen changes (28.3–41.5 per 100 PY) [17, 29, 30]. This is expected as viral load measurement and availability of subsequent antiretroviral treatment options are limited when compared with resource-rich settings [31].

Toxicities were the predominant reasons for ART regimens changed. This is consistent with other studies [29, 30, 32–34]. Like other studies, [17, 27, 35] our study found that fat changes and peripheral neuropathy were the most frequent toxicities. Unlike our setting and other sub-Saharan countries, hematological toxicities were the most common toxicities reported in Latin Americans [16, 31, 36, 37].

New TB drug treatment was also a major reason for the initial ART regimen change, especially for NVP-based regimens. This was due to an interaction of NVP with the anti-TB drugs such as Rifampin [38, 39]. In order to avoid this drug interaction, clinicians replace the NVP with EFV [23, 24]. Being infected with HIV virus may also expose patients to develop TB early [38, 40] and thereby lead to modification of NVP to EFV.

In the current study, the hazard of regimen change was higher in Tb/HIV co-infected patients than in patients with HIV infections alone. This is consistent with other studies [20, 41, 42]. Studies showed that co-morbidities in patients with advanced disease and concurrent treatments for opportunistic diseases may affect antiretroviral tolerance and thereby disallow patients from regular treatment intake [40, 43, 44].

EFV-based regimens had the lower hazard of change than NVP-based regimens. This is similar to other studies [14, 16, 17, 45]. The increased hazard for NVP-based regimens change might be due to the frequent use of fixed-dose combinations containing D4T and NVP as D4T was the drug most often modified. Early modification of NVP due to new TB treatment was also a possible reason for an increased hazard of NVP-based regimen changes [38, 39].

Patients who were above the primary level of education had the higher hazard of regimen change than those below primary level education. Although we did not assess their knowledge, this might be due to better awareness of ART-associated toxicities and reasons for regimen change among the educated groups.

Conclusion

One in two patients changed their ART, mainly due to drug toxicity. New TB drug treatment, being pregnant and treatment failure were other reasons for the regimen changed. Regimen changed patients were more likely to be HIV/TB co-infected, above primary level education, and on D4T or NVP based regimens. We recommended strengthening adherence level and adopting benchmarking programs such as a linkage-case-management to enhance ART linkage and retention, which have demonstrated to be effective in similar settings [46, 47].

Limitation of the study

We acknowledge the limitations of the current study including:

  • Reasons for regimen change were documented only if they were incidental to regimen change, therefore, their frequency cannot be used to estimate their actual occurrence.

  • The outcome status of regimen changed patients was not known.

  • Some variables such as mental illness and stigma were not assessed as our data source lacked this information.

Abbreviations

ART: 

antiretroviral therapy

D4T: 

stavudine

EFV: 

efavirenz

FMOH: 

Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health

HAART: 

highly active antiretroviral therapy

HIV/AIDS: 

human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

IQR: 

interquartile range

JUTH: 

Jimma University Tertiary Hospital

LTFU: 

lost to follow up

NNRTIs: 

non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

NRTIs: 

nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

NVP: 

nevirapine

PCP: 

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia

PMCT: 

prevention of mother to child transmission

TDF: 

tenofovir

UNAIDs: 

United Nations Program on HIV and AIDS

WHO: 

World Health Organization

ZDV: 

zidovudine

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

EM: conceived, designed and participated in data collection, conducted the data analysis and interpretation, developed the first draft and revised subsequent drafts. AW: advised on the conception of the study area, data analysis and interpretation. NH: reviewed and commented on successive drafts. TF: commented on successive drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Jimma University, College of Health and Medical Science for providing access to the data. We were also grateful for the data collectors and supervisors for the carefully undertaking of their tasks.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the paper. The SPSS data of individual patients are not permitted to be provided to other bodies, as indicated on ethical clearance. However, researchers who need further clarification can obtain anonymized data from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance board of Jimma University ethically approved all the study methods and protocols and responded with a letter reference number RPGC/109/2013. Informed consent was not taken from the patients, as the information was extracted from anonymized data.

Funding

Funding was obtained from Jimma University, College of health and medical science.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
(2)
Department of Epidemiology, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
(3)
School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
(4)
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia

References

  1. Wang H, Wolock TM, Carter A, Nguyen G, Kyu HH, Gakidou E, et al. Estimates of global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980–2015: the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(8):e361–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mocroft A, Vella S, Benfield TL, Chiesi A, Miller V, Gargalianos P, et al. Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients infected with HIV-1. EuroSIDA study group. Lancet. 1998;352(9142):1725–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Egger M, May M, Chene G, Phillips AN, Ledergerber B, Dabis F, et al. Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9327):119–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron DW, Heath-Chiozzi M, Danner S, Cohen C, Kravcik S, Maurath C, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in advanced HIV-1 disease. The advanced HIV disease ritonavir study group. Lancet. 1998;351(9102):543–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford N, Darder M, Spelman T, Maclean E, Mills E, Boulle A. Early adherence to antiretroviral medication as a predictor of long-term HIV virological suppression: 5-year follow up of an observational cohort. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10460.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Assefa Y, Lynen L, Wouters E, Rasschaert F, Peeters K, Van Damme W. How to improve patient retention in an antiretroviral treatment program in Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gesesew HA, Ward P, Woldemichael K, Mwanri L. Prevalence, trend and risk factors for antiretroviral therapy discontinuation among HIV-infected adults in Ethiopia in 2003–2015. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179533.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Li X, Margolick JB, Conover CS, Badri S, Riddler SA, Witt MD, et al. Interruption and discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the multicenter AIDS cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(3):320–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosen S, Fox MP. Retention in HIV care between testing and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2011;8(7):e1001056.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Makunde WH, Francis F, Mmbando BP, Kamugisha ML, Rutta AM, Mandara CI, et al. Lost to follow up and clinical outcomes of HIV in adult patients on antiretroviral therapy in care and treatment centers in Tanga City, north-eastern Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2012;14(4):250–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schoni-Affolter F, Keiser O, Mwango A, Stringer J, Ledergerber B, Mulenga L, et al. Estimating loss to follow-up in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: the effect of the competing risk of death in Zambia and Switzerland. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e27919.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Wubshet M, Berhane Y, Worku A, Kebede Y, Diro E. High loss to follow up and early mortality create substantial reduction in patient retention in antiretroviral treatment program in North-West Ethiopia. ISRN AIDS. 2012;2012:721720.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Nevin CR, Ye J, Aban I, Mugavero MJ, Jackson D, Lin HY, et al. The role of toxicity-related regimen changes in the development of antiretroviral resistance. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2011;27(9):957–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mocroft A, Youle M, Moore A, Sabin CA, Madge S, Lepri AC, et al. Reasons for modification and discontinuation of antiretrovirals: results from a single treatment center. AIDS. 2001;15(2):185–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumarasamy N, Vallabhaneni S, Cecelia AJ, Yepthomi T, Balakrishnan P, Saghayam S, et al. Reasons for modification of generic highly active antiretroviral therapeutic regimens among patients in southern India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(1):53–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cesar C, Shepherd BE, Krolewiecki AJ, Fink VI, Schechter M, Tuboi SH, et al. Rates and reasons for early change of first HAART in HIV-1-infected patients in 7 sites throughout the Caribbean and Latin America. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(6):e10490.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Cardoso SW, Grinsztejn B, Velasque L, Veloso VG, Luz PM, Friedman RK, et al. Incidence of modifying or discontinuing first HAART regimen and its determinants in a cohort of HIV-infected patients from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2010;26(8):865–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Berheto TM, Haile DB, Mohammed S. Predictors of loss to follow-up in patients living with HIV/AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6(9):453–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Bucciardini R, Fragola V, Abegaz T, Lucattini S, Halifom A, Tadesse E, et al. Retention in care of adult HIV patients initiating antiretroviral therapy in Tigray, Ethiopia: a prospective observational cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0136117.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Deribe K, Hailekiros F, Biadgilign S, Amberbir A, Beyene BK. Defaulters from antiretroviral treatment in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13(3):328–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Melaku Z, Lamb MR, Wang C, Lulseged S, Gadisa T, Ahmed S, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of adult Ethiopian patients enrolled in HIV care and treatment: a multi-clinic observational study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:462.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wubshet M, Berhane Y, Worku A, Kebede Y. Death and seeking alternative therapy largely accounted for lost to follow-up of patients on ART in northwest Ethiopia: a community tracking survey. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e59197.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. WHO. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents. Geneva: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
  24. FHAPCO. Country Progress Report on HIV/AIDS: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa; 2014.Google Scholar
  25. UNAIDS. 90-90-90: On the right track towards the global target. 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Tadesse K, Haile F, Hiruy N. Predictors of mortality among patients enrolled on antiretroviral therapy in Aksum hospital, northern Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e87392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiguba R, Byakika-Tusiime J, Karamagi C, Ssali F, Mugyenyi P, Katabira E. Discontinuation and modification of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected Ugandans: prevalence and associated factors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45(2):218–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Agbaji OO, Abah IO, Falang KD, Ebonyi AO, Musa J, Ugoagwu P, et al. Treatment discontinuation in adult HIV-infected patients on first-line antiretroviral Therapy in Nigeria. Curr HIV Res. 2015;13(3):184–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Keita M, Chouquet C, Cuzin L, Cissé M, Lang T, Delpierre C. Incidence and risk factors of first-line HAART discontinuation: is it worth choosing competing risk or standard survival approaches? J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;3(10):1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hart E, Curtis H, Wilkins E, Johnson M. National review of first treatment change after starting highly active antiretroviral therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients. HIV Med. 2007;8(3):186–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Keiser O, Anastos K, Schechter M, Balestre E, Myer L, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings 1996–2006: patient characteristics, treatment regimens and monitoring in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Latin America. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13(7):870–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Brien ME, Clark RA, Besch CL, Myers L, Kissinger P. Patterns and correlates of discontinuation of the initial HAART regimen in an urban outpatient cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34(4):407–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gulick RM, Mellors JW, Havlir D, Eron JJ, Gonzalez C, McMahon D, et al. Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(11):734–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cicconi P, Cozzi-Lepri A, Castagna A, Trecarichi EM, Antinori A, Gatti F, et al. Insights into reasons for discontinuation according to year of starting first regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a cohort of antiretroviral-naive patients. HIV Med. 2010;11(2):104–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Forna F, Liechty CA, Solberg P, Asiimwe F, Were W, Mermin J, et al. Clinical toxicity of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a home-based AIDS care program in rural Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(4):456–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Walensky RP, Wood R, Ciaranello AL, Paltiel AD, Lorenzana SB, Anglaret X, et al. Scaling up the 2010 World Health Organization HIV treatment guidelines in resource-limited settings: a model-based analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7(12):e1000382.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Murphy RA, Sunpath H, Kuritzkes DR, Venter F, Gandhi RT. Antiretroviral therapy-associated toxicities in the resource-poor world: the challenge of a limited formulary. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(Suppl 3):S449–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kwara A, Flanigan TP, Carter EJ. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in adults with tuberculosis: current status. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(3):248–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bonora S, Di Perri G. Interactions between antiretroviral agents and those used to treat tuberculosis. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2008;3(3):306–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gay CL, Napravnik S, Eron JJ Jr. Advanced immunosuppression at entry to HIV care in the southeastern United States and associated risk factors. AIDS. 2006;20(5):775–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bassett IV, Chetty S, Wang B, Mazibuko M, Giddy J, Lu Z, et al. Loss to follow-up and mortality among HIV-infected people co-infected with TB at ART initiation in Durban, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(1):25–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Rachlis B, Bakoyannis G, Easterbrook P, Genberg B, Braithwaite RS, Cohen CR, et al. Facility-level factors influencing retention of patients in HIV care in east Africa. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8):e0159994.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Gesesew H, Tsehaineh B, Massa D, Tesfay A, Kahsay H, Mwanri L. The role of social determinants on tuberculosis/HIV co-infection mortality in southwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Toossi Z. Virological and immunological impact of tuberculosis on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(8):1146–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. d’Arminio Monforte A, Lepri AC, Rezza G, Pezzotti P, Antinori A, Phillips AN, et al. Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naive patients. I.CO.N.A. study group. Italian cohort of antiretroviral-naive patients. AIDS. 2000;14(5):499–507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bergmann H, Pitorak H, Cornman H. Linkage and retention in pre-ART care: best practices and experiences from fourteen countries. Arlington, VA: USAID’s AIDS Support and Technical Assistance Resources, AIDSTAR-One, Task Order 1. 2013.Google Scholar
  47. Govindasamy D, Meghij J, Negussie E, Baggaley R, Kranzer K. Interventions to improve or facilitate linkage to or retention in pre-ART (HIV) care and initiation of ART in low- and middle income settings a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19032.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us