Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Level and factors associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness among semi-pastoral pregnant women in southern Ethiopia, 2016

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 2Email author
BMC Research Notes201811:442

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3539-7

  • Received: 7 May 2018
  • Accepted: 26 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the level of birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) and associated factors among semi-pastoral pregnant women in southern, Ethiopia.

Result

This dataset contains the full data collected from 746 pregnant women. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women in southern Ethiopia was 27.1%. The main predictors for BRCP were attending formal education (AOR = 4.65, 95% CI 2.45–8.63), husband occupation [merchant (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI 1.52–9.64)], spouse attending formal education (AOR = 3.35, 95% CI (1.83–6.14), ANC visits > 4 times (AOR = 17.78, 95% CI 7.11–44.47). In addition, knowledge of women at least two danger signs during pregnancy, delivery and after delivery (AOR = 3.32, 95% CI 1.64–6.69), (AOR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.58–6.20) and (AOR = 3.75, 95% CI 1.93–7.28) respectively were significantly associated with BPCR. In conclusion, the proportion of BPCR among women in southern Ethiopia was found to be low.

Keywords

  • Birth preparedness
  • Complication
  • Readiness
  • Semi-pastoral
  • Pregnant women in southern Ethiopia

Introduction

Maternal mortality rate (MMR) remains a global public health concern especially in developing countries [1]. Worldwide, nearly 275,288 maternal deaths occurred due to pregnancy and related complications [2]. In 2000, millennium development goal (MDG) targeted for World Health Organization [1] member countries reducing MMR by 75% [3]. But still MMR was remains unacceptably high in developing countries particularly in sub-Sahara African countries [4, 5] which is 920 per 100,000 live births, and the lifetime risk of maternal death is 1 in 16 compared to 1 in 2400 in Europe [5]. Ethiopia is a country that experience high MMR rate [1]. It is the most sensitive indicator of the health disparities between poorer and richer nations, and for general growth. The effects of MM also have influences on other families like children [4, 69]. The survival status of all under-five children has significant association with child nutrition and other vital child health care practices seeking maternal involvement [10].

Low institutional deliveries, shortage of birth preparedness, the poor competence of health care providers, shortage of emergency obstetric services at facilities and week referral systems for obstetric emergencies were the common factors [1114]. In Ethiopia, there is a minimal utilization of necessary maternal health services by pregnant women [12, 1416]. This can be related to many factors identified by different studies are socio-demographic, cultural, communal, limited access to health facilities and poor quality of care in health facilities [12, 1416]. The cause of maternal death was recognized as the three delays model [17] which is a delay in deciding to seek care (delay 1), delay in reaching the health facility (delay 2), and delay in receiving quality care once at the health facility (delay 3). And therefore, to reduce maternal death different strategies were initiated at the country wide. Of these, birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) is one [12, 1416]. In Ethiopia evidences show that the status of birth BPCR was low; Aleta Wondo district (17%) [18], Jimma Zone (23.3%) [19] and Basoliben District (26.9%) [20].

Main text

Method

Study area and period, study design and populations

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Southern Ethiopia on August 2016. The setting is located 470 km away from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. According to the projected population estimate of 2016 the district has a total of 282,912 populations of these 42,707 women’s were expected to give birth [21]. All pregnant women who were permanently resided in the semi-pastoral of Bule Hora District were the study population.

Sample size and sampling procedure

Sample size was determined using single population proportion formula. We considered 17% level of compliance from the previous study [12]. We also considered a 5% level of significance (α) and 5% margin of error. Using these assumptions the sample size was calculated to be 339. After considering non-response rate (10%) and design effect (2), the final sample size obtained was 746. Participants were selected by multi-stage systematic random sampling from the population who were pregnant during the study period. The total number of pregnant women who lives in the study area was 3731 and we divided 3731 (sampling frame) by 746 (sample), so that a sampling fraction of 1/5 was obtained. To determine the order of the first respondent, we employed simple random sampling technique among the first five participants, and it was found to be the 3rd pregnant women. Thus, every 3rd participant starting from the first respondent was then included and interviewed until we get the required sample size.

Operational definition

Well prepared BPCR mother

If she reported at least three of five variables that she identified place of delivery, saved money, identify skilled provider at birth, identified a means of transport and identification of compatible blood donors in case of emergency.

Birth preparation

An arrangement, plan, or time preparing for delivery.

Complication readiness

It is a state of being prepared or willing for something that makes the situation difficult or the act of doing this (source JHPIEGO).

Data collection and quality management

Structured and pretested questionnaire were used for data collection. To maintain the data quality; pretest, training and supervision was done. Ten diploma nurse as data collectors and 2 BSc holder nurses as a supervisor were participated.

Data-analysis

The data were collected by interview on variables like, dependent variable: birth preparedness and complication readiness. Independent variables: maternal-factors (age, marital status, occupation, ethnicity, education, income, family size), reproductive factors (parity and history of still birth), paternal factors (occupation, education), health service factors (ANC use), obstetrics factors (gravidity) and knowledge factors (key danger sign, transportation, delivery cost and ANC) characteristics using structured and pretested questionnaire. The collected data were entered to Epidata version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 22. Data were checked for consistency and completeness, and then descriptive and analytic computations were carried out. Bivariable (P value < 0.2 considered as a candidate variable multivariable binary logistic regression model was fitted to the data to identify variables associated with the dependent variable. Variables with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SPSS version 20 was used to perform the analysis.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

A total of 746 pregnant women were interviewed. Almost half, 384 (51.5%) of them were found between 25 and 34 years of age. Majority, 535 (71.7%) of the participants were protestant and, reflecting the ethnic composition of study setting which is Oromo (93.4%). Slightly less than half 347 (46.5%) of the pregnant women were illiterate, the majority of the respondents, 724 (97%), were married, 651 (87.3) of respondents parent were farmer and while 332 (44.5%) attended elementary education (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, among semi-pastoral pregnant women Bule Hora woreda, Oromia region, Ethiopia, August, 2016

Variables

Frequency

Percent (%)

Age

 16–24

196

26.3

 25–34

384

51.5

 35–49

166

22.3

Religious

 Protestant

535

71.7

 Orthodox

89

11.9

 Muslim

84

11.3

 Others

38

5.3

Marital status

 Married

724

97

 Othera

22

3

Ethnicity

 Oromo

697

93.4

 Amhara

27

3.7

 Othersb

22

2.9

Occupation of women

 Housewives

550

73.7

 Student

92

12.3

 Farmer

27

3.6

Education level of woman

 Not attended formal education

332

44.5

 Primary education (1–8)

91

12.2

 Secondary education

219

29.4

 College and above

10

1.3

Education level of husband

 Not attended formal education

258

38.2

 Primary education (1–8)

249

33.3

 Secondary education

187

25

 College and above

25

3.4

Family size

 1–3

193

25.9

 4–6

290

38.9

 ≥ 6

263

35.3

Parity

 0

22

2.9

 1–2

255

34.2

 >/3

469

62.9

History of stillbirth

 0

630

84.5

 1

116

15.5

Monthly income (ETB)

 < 500

510

68.3

 501–1000

130

17.4

 Above 1000

106

14

asingle, divorced, widowed

bprotestant, catholic

Knowledge of danger signs

Regarding about knowledge on key danger signs during pregnancy showed that 198 (26.5%) and 158 (21.2%) of the study participants were aware of vaginal bleeding and severe fatigue respectively. During labor and delivery knowledge on severe vaginal bleeding, prolonged labor and retained placenta were 242 (32.4%), 337 (45.29%) and 298 (39.9%) respectively. Knowledge during post-natal period sever bleeding foul-smelling vaginal discharge and high fever was reported 265 (35.5%), 158 (21.2%) and 88 (11.8%) respectively. Of the total respondents, 304 (40.8%), 280 (37.5%) and 254 (34%) of them mentioned at least two key danger signs during pregnancy, delivery and after delivery respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy, labor and immediate postpartum period among semi pastoral pregnant women, Bule Hora woreda, Oromia region, Ethiopia, August 2016

Variables

Frequency

Danger signs during pregnancy

Yes

No

No

%

No

%

Sever fatigue

158

21.2

588

78.8

Severe abdominal pain

142

19

604

81

Bleeding from the vagina

198

26.5

548

73.5

Fever

32

4.3

714

95.7

Unusual swelling of face/finger/legs

76

10.2

670

89.8

Sever and continued headache

151

20.2

595

79.8

Rapid or difficult breathing

61

8.2

685

91.8

Foul smelling vaginal discharge

68

9.1

678

90.9

Convulsions/fits

27

3.6

719

96.4

Loss of consciousness

58

7.8

688

92.2

Blurred vision

127

17

619

83

Danger signs in labor and delivery

Heavy bleeding

242

32.4

504

67.6

Prolonged (> 12 h) labor

337

45.2

409

54.8

Vaginal tearing

75

10.7

671

89.9

Green or brown water coming from the vaginal

65

8.7

681

91.3

Water break and labor not induced within 6 h

67

9

679

91

Placenta not expelled within 1 h

298

39.9

448

60.1

Danger signs in postpartum

Heavy bleeding

265

35.5

481

64.5

Bad smelling vaginal discharge

158

21.2

588

78.8

High fever

88

11.8

658

88.2

Painful urination

148

19.9

598

80.1

Hot swollen, painful breasts

186

24.9

560

75.1

Birth preparedness and complication readiness

Two hundred sixteen (29%) and 14 (1.9%) of the respondents had good knowledge on identifying place of delivery and blood donor respectively. In this study three and more steps from five where considered as a cutoff points to categorize whether pregnant women prepare for birth or not and that 202 (27.1%) of the study participants were found to be prepared for BPCR. One hundred seventy-two (23.1%) of the respondents were planned to identified a skilled birth attendant while 200 (26.8%) of the respondents were plan saving money in case of emergency. Similarly, 186 (24.9%) of the respondents arranged transport service for labor service (Additional file 1).

Role of husband during ANC and labour

Half, 366 (50.5%) and 404 (55.8) of the respondents Husband accompanied them to the Health facility visit. While, 108 (14.9%) and 102 (14.9%) of the husbands were cares children at homes and looked after the cattle at respectively (Additional file 2).

Factors associated with BPCR

Binary logistic regression showed that BPCR practice has a significant association with education status of pregnant women, educational and occupational status of their spouse, the frequency of the ANC is visiting as well as, knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy, labour and post-partum. The Multivariate logistic regression showed that BPCR was a significant association with variable like to attend formal education (AOR = 4.65, 95% CI 2.49–8.63), employment (AOR = 2.76 95% CI 1.10–5.54), merchant husbands (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI 1.52–9.64), the spouse with formal education (AOR = 3.35, 95% CI 1.83–6.14), ANC Visit more (Table 3).
Table 3

Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression of the likelihood to be prepared for birth and complications among semi pastoral pregnant women, Bule Hora, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2016

Variables

BPCR

OR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

P value

Yes

No

Age of respondents

 16–24

49

147

1

1

 

 25–34

109

275

1.189 (1.08–1.7)

1.83 (1.55–3.22)

0.004

 35–49

44

122

1.08 (0.064–1.736)

0.71 (.36–1.38)

 

Education of woman

 Formal

157

166

7.95 (5.44–.11.59)

4.65 (2.49–8.63)

P < 0.001

 Not formal

45

378

1

1

 

Education of husband

 Formal

165

293

3.97 (2.65–5.94)

3.35 (1.83–6.14)

P = 0.002

 Not formal

37

247

1

1

 

Occupation of husband

 Farmer

151

500

1

1

 

 Merchant

27

19

4.65 (2.52–8.61)

3.83 (1.52–9.64)

P < 0.001

 Employed

23

1

9.17 (3.25–25.89)

2.76 (1.10–5.54)

 

Parity

 ≤ 2

61

189

1

1

P = 0.14

 > 3

132

344

1.28 (1.07–1.69)

1.39 (0.72–2.67)

 

Knowledge at least two sign during pregnancy

 Yes

162

142

11.4 (7.72–17.02)

3.32 (1.64–6.69)

P = 0.001

 No

40

402

1

1

 

Knowledge at two danger signs during labor

 Yes

161

119

9.36 (6.37–13.76)

3.13 (1.58–6.20)

P < 0.001

 No

41

425

1

1

 

Knowledge of at least two danger signs after delivery

 Yes

153

101

13.69 (9.29–20.18)

3.75 (1.93–7.28)

P < 0.001

 No

49

443

1

1

 

ANC visit

 < 4

89

456

1

1

 

 ≥ 4

113

14

19.9 (9.67–38.877)

17.78 (7.11–44.47)

P < 0.001

Discussion

This study found that birth preparedness and complication readiness at western Oromia was accounted for 27.1% [22] of the pregnant women which is similar with studies done in Basoliben District, Goba district and Jima town of Ethiopia were 26.9, 29.9, and 23.3% respectively [15, 19, 23]. The finding is higher than findings at Aleta wondo 18.1% and Adigrat town, Tigray 21.2% [17, 24]. The discrepancy might have resulted from the difference between the residential areas in which the current incorporate mostly the rural kebeles than the previous one.

In other way, the current finding was lower than findings observed at Debrebirehan town and southwest Nigeria which was 53.9 and 51.6% respectively [25, 26]. This discrepancy might be due to the study area different. Debrebirehan is a zonal were most of the residents are educated compared with the current study area. In another case, the socio-economic status of Nigeria was better than Ethiopia.

This study also showed that women who had Knowledge about at least two danger signs during pregnancy, delivery and after delivering were 40.8, 37.5 and 34% respectively which is comparable to finding of Goba district danger signs during delivery and after delivery were 26 and 27% respectively but knowledge during pregnancy higher 66% [15]. The current finding has variation when compared with a study finding in Nepal knowledge on Obstetric danger signs during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum were 34.8, 59.0 and 39.7% respectively [5, 19]. However it compared slightly higher to other studies done in Jimma town, the difference may be due to the fact that unlike the current study the former study considers woman is knowledgeable if only mention there and more danger signs which could decrease the number of respondents [19].

Another encouraging finding were identifying the place of delivery and saving money 29 and 26.8% respectively which are the most common practice of BPCR. Lower than the finding in Jima town 73.5 and 60.2% of the respondents planned to save money and arrange transport [19]. And a study in Uganda, Mbarara, and majority of the respondents identified the place of delivery and saved money [13]. However, planned to arrange blood donor and planned to be attended by skilled were 1.9 and 23.1% respectively, which was still low. These low levels of preparations were also reported in other prior studies in Ethiopia and other abroad countries. In the study conducted in Jima town west Ethiopia, 19.9% planned to arrange blood donor and 21.9% identify skilled attendant [19]. Similarly, in the study conducted in Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia in 2007, plan to arrange blood donor and identify skilled attendant was 2.3, 8.1% respectively [22]. Being BPCR is a new strategy which is yet to expand, low education level of women and the population as a whole may explain this low practice of the indication of PBCR among the study population.

Women education and Husband occupation were determinant factors for BPCR. Attending formal education among woman was 5 times more likelihood to increase BPCR than the counterpart (OR = 4.65 95% CI 2.49–8.63). Moreover, having spouse who is a merchant formally educated increased the likelihood of BPCR by 1.5 and 3.88 respectively which is comparable with previous findings in Ethiopia and abroad; where education, occupation, and income were among the factors affecting birth preparedness and complication readiness [15, 17, 22]. The possible reason for this could be due to the fact that being educated, being a merchant and employed increases access to information and are able to prepare for birth and complication readiness respectively.

Women who have more than three ANC visit were 17.78 times more likely to prepare for BPCR than the counterpart (P < 0.001, AOR = 17.78, 95% 95% CI 7.11–44.4) which was supported by a study conducted in Nepal [5]. Moreover, this study found that pregnant women knowledge towards at least two danger signs during, pregnancy (AOR = 3.32, CI 1.64–6.69), labor (AOR = 3.13 95% CI 1.58–6.20) and after delivery (AOR = 3.75, CI 1.93–7.28) were predictor for BPCR and this was supported by study findings done at Ethiopian country and abroad knowledge of danger signs was the strongest predictors of BPCR practice [3, 17, 22, 23]. This might be due to that knowledge of obstetric danger signs is essential to motivate women to seek skilled attendance at birth and prompt practices of another component of BPCR.

Conclusions and recommendations

This study found that birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women at southern Ethiopia was lower. Women education, husband-education, occupation, knowledge on danger-sign, and ANC visits were identified as factors affecting BPCR.

Limitation

The limitation of this study was failing to consider temporal residence.

Abbreviations

BPCR: 

birth preparedness and complication reediness

ANC: 

antenatal care

MMR: 

maternal mortality rate

MDGs: 

millennium development goal

WHO: 

World Health Organization

LB: 

live births

CI: 

confidence interval

EDHS: 

Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AI, MA, conceived and designed the study, performed analysis and interpretation of data. HZ and CTL supervised the design conception, analysis, interpretation of data and made critical comments at each step of research. CTL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank College of Health Science, Debre Markos University for approving the research topics. We would like to express our gratitude to data collectors and supervisors for their timely submission of completed questionnaires and to respondents for their willingness to participate in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset will not be shared in order to protect the participants’ identities.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical letter was obtained from the Ethical review committee of Debre Markos University, College of Medicine and Health Science. Moreover, by mentioning the low harm of the study, the ethics committee also approved the possibility of interviewing the respondents with age < 18 years old. Permission was taken from the local administrative. Informed verbal consent was taken from each individual. Their full right to withdraw or refuse to participate before their verbal consent was obtained.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Maternal and Child Health Program, Bule Hora District Health Office, Borena Zone, Ethiopia
(2)
Department of Public Health, Health Science College, Debre Markos University, P.o.box: 269, Debre Markos, Amhara region, Ethiopia
(3)
Department of Nursing, Health Science College, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Amhara region, Ethiopia

References

  1. WHO U, UNFPA. Maternal mortality in estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA. Geneva: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Nations U. Millennium development goals. New York: United Nations; 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Ekabua JE. Awareness of birth preparedness and complication readiness in southeastern Nigeria. ISRN obstetric gynecol. WHO, (Geneva: WHO, Trend in maternal Mortality: WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank Estimates) 1990–2010.Google Scholar
  4. EDHS. Ethiopian mini demographic health survey, Ethiopia federal ministry of health (EFMOH) Addis Ababa; 2014.Google Scholar
  5. McPherson RA, Khadka N, Moore JM, Sharma M. Are birth-preparedness programmers effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha district, Nepal. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24(4):479–88.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Tadesse E, Adane M, Abiyou M. Caesarean section deliveries at Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 1996;73(9):619–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Motherhood. TWRAfS. The White Ribbon Alliance for safe motherhood. An essential strategy for safe motherhood ensuring birth preparedness and complication readiness for every pregnant woman, 2011; 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Program. JMaNHM. Behavior change interventions for safe mother hood common problems, unique solutions. JHPIEGO: Baltimore; 2012. p. 21231–3492.Google Scholar
  9. Program. JMaNHM. Birth preparedness and complication readiness: a matrix of shared responsibility. JHPIEGO: Baltimore; 2010.Google Scholar
  10. Urassa DP, Pembe AB, Mganga F. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women in Mpwapwa district, Tanzania. J Health Res. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v14i1.8.Google Scholar
  11. Idowu A, Deji SA, Ayodele O, Matthew O, David A. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women attending antenatal clinics in Ogbomoso, South West, Nigeria. Int J MCH AIDS. 2015;4(1):47–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kabakyenga JK, Koodsabppawir URH. Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda. Reprod Health. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-8-33.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukhopadhyay DK, et al. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women of Bankura District, West Bengal. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2016;5(2):404–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Desalegn MDB. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women of child bearing age group in Goba Woreda, Oromia region, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. EDHS. 15. Ethiopia Demographic Health Survey; 2011.Google Scholar
  16. JHPIEGO Maternal and Neonatal health (MNH) Program. Birth preparedness and complication readiness: a matrix of shared responsibilities. JHPIEGO-MNH; 2001. pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
  17. Iliyasu Z, Abubakar IS, et al. Birth preparedness, complication readiness and fathers’ participation in maternity care in a northern Nigerian community. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(1):21–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Idowu A, Deji SA, Arem OA, Bojuwoye OM. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women attending antenatal clinics in Ogbomoso, South West. Nigeria. Int J MCH AIDS. 2015;4(1):47–56.Google Scholar
  19. Debelew GT, Afework MF, Yalew AW. Factors affecting birth preparedness and complication readiness in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:272.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Bishaw W, Awoke W, Teshome M. Birth preparedness and complication readiness and associated factors among pregnant women in Basoliben District, Amhara Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia, 2013. Prim Health Care. 2014;4:171. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1079.1000171.Google Scholar
  21. Hora B. Bule Hora woreda health office and Bule Hora hospital 6 month report; 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Hailu M, Gebremariam A, Alemseged F, Deribe K. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in southern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):e21432.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Bishaw W, Awoke W, Teshome M. Birth preparedness and complication readiness and associated factors among pregnant women in Basoliben District, Amhara Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia. Prim Health Care. 2013;4:171.Google Scholar
  24. Mihret MF. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women in Adigrat town, North Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2007;22(1):14–20.Google Scholar
  25. Hailemariam A, Nahusenay H, Ewnet GH, Alkibet A, Bisrat G. Assessment of magnitude and factors associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women attending antenatal care services at public health facilities Debrebirhan Town, Amhara, Ethiopia. Glob J Med Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20160402.12.Google Scholar
  26. Idowu A, Deji SA, Olatayo AA, Bojuwoye OM, Akinyemi DO. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among women attending antenatal clinics in Ogbomoso, South West, Nigeria. Int J MCH AIDS. 2015;4(1):47–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement