Skip to main content

Regulatory processes that control haploid expression of salmon sperm mRNAs



Various stages of mRNA processing are necessary for functionally important genes required during late-stage sperm differentiation. Protein–RNA complexes form that edit, stabilize, store, deliver, localize and regulate translation of sperm mRNAs. These regulatory processes are often directed by recognition sequence elements and the particular composition of the proteins associated with the mRNAs. Previous work has shown that the cAMP response element modulator (CREM), estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα) and forkhead box L2A (FOXL2A) proteins are present in late-stage salmon sperm. Here we investigate whether these and other regulatory proteins might control processing of mRNAs not expressed until the haploid stage of development. We also examine regulatory processes that prepare and present mRNAs that generate unique products essential for differentiating sperm (i.e. for flagellar assembly and function).


We provide evidence for potential sperm-specific recognition elements in 5′-untranslated regions (utrs) that may bind CREM, ERα, FOXL2A, Y-box and other proteins. We show that changes within the 5′-utrs and open reading frames of some sperm genes lead to distinct protein termini that may provide specific interfaces necessary for localization and function within the paternal gamete.


Posttranscriptional processes can shape the presentation of mRNAs through the addition, subtraction and shuffling of specific blocks of sequence. The large number of variants (and activities) generated from just one gene, the cAMP response element modulator (CREM), is an excellent example of post-transcriptional modulation [1]. Intrinsic signal motifs borne in regions throughout mRNA bodies are important for directing mRNA processing within different cell types and during different stages of development. RNA-binding protein (RBP)–mRNA interactions can specify functional and subcellular localization units as part of a larger regulatory network [2]. In late-stage, transcriptionally quiescent sperm cells, recognition elements within various mRNAs provide specific signals for interactions with RBPs and RNA cofactors necessary for stability, storage, transport, localization and subsequent translation [3,4,5,6].

As well, during differentiation, post-transcriptionally reconfigured and sperm-specific gene products often present distinct interfaces that enable interaction with structures unique to the male germ cell, such as the axoneme, outer dense fibers (ODFs), and the mitochondrial and fibrous sheaths [7]. Changes in the presentation of N- and C-termini permit enzymes and signal transducers to associate with these various substructures and perform functions that may be unique from their somatic counterparts [8,9,10 and references within each].

Most of our knowledge of these various processes has come from mammalian studies. Recent RNAseq and assembly of a salmon sperm transcriptome [11] prompted us to investigate whether similar mechanisms of mRNA regulation are evident in teleost fish.

We discovered potential signal elements of different types and configurations within the 5′-untranslated regions (utrs) of post-meiotically-expressed mRNAs that may recognize and interact with regulatory proteins. These interactions could prepare sperm mRNAs for stage-specific storage, localization and/or translation. We provide potential evidence that changes within 5′-utrs and open reading frames of some sperm genes can lead to distinct protein N- and C-termini that may provide the interfaces necessary for localization and function within the germ cell.

Main text


Identification and characterization of RNA recognition motifs

Sperm sampling, RNA extraction and isolation, and transcript sequencing, assembly and annotation have been previously described in detail [11]. The salmon sperm transcriptomic sequences are publicly available [12]. We selected genes, such as ida2, odf3b, stpg2, based on the association of their products with flagella substructures, or for their potential to be involved in powering flagellar motion (e.g. AKs [13]; ERα [11]). The 5′-end regions of the sperm transcripts were examined in alignments with somatic isoforms in CLUSTALW [14].

We preliminarily examined the 5′-utrs with MatInspector [15]. Sequence motifs presumed or demonstrated to bind CREB/CREM, ER and FOXL2 in other fish species were also identified [16, 17 and references in both]. Identification of potential recognition elements in the selected sperm 5′-utrs was then performed manually. Other elements with unknown binding partners were also identified that were present across the sequences examined and/or presented as duplicated sequence within individual 5′-utrs. CREB and CREM are highly homologous and their various isoforms bind the CRE, but do so in combination with distinct co-activators [1, 18].

Identification of potential protein sperm-specific localization motifs

Differences in the domains and specific motifs present in the somatic and germ-cell isoforms of AK8 and GnRH-II-R were determined in MotifScan [19].

Verification of transcript sequences by comparison to genome

Assembled transcripts were mapped to the Atlantic salmon reference genome [20] with BLAT (-ooc = 11.ooc, -fine [21]) or Geneious v8.1.7 (map-to-reference, max gap = 50,000 bp [22]) with manual correction. Portions of the fragments not mapping to reference in original analysis were placed using Blastn [23]. Reference Sequence (RefSeq) transcript coordinates were obtained from the NCBI’s genome annotation (Release 100) for Atlantic salmon [24].

Results and discussion

Transcriptional activity in post-meiotic germ cells is considered completely arrested following chromatin reorganization and compaction of the genome [5, 18]. During this period, translation of many mRNAs may be delayed for functions required during later stages of sperm differentiation. Several different processes are employed that link transcription of these genes with subsequent mRNA processing and delayed translation [3,4,5,6]. Notable among these are the groups of mRNAs that are transcriptionally upregulated by the Y-box [25] and CREM [18] proteins before transcriptional arrest.

Interestingly, there is evidence that signal motifs residing within the untranslated regions (utrs) of some of these mRNAs may also serve as recognition binding elements for the CREM and Y-box proteins [26], as well as for many other regulatory proteins and RNAs [3,4,5,6, 27,28,29]. Once transcribed, the subsets of mRNAs important for late-stage sperm development are bound within RNA–protein complexes, stored, transported and localized to await disassembly and translation. Much is still to be learned about all of the components bound within these complexes and the particular interactions that impart control of these regulatory processes.

We examined the 5′-utrs of genes required in later stages of salmonid spermatid differentiation and found potential motifs representing Y-box binding elements. Eight of the twelve 5′-utrs we examined possessed the Y-box RNA-binding recognition motif: five different examples are shown in Fig. 1, plus two adenylate kinases (ak8) (Fig. 2) and one GnRH-II-receptor (gnrh2r) (Fig. 3). (A more comprehensive presentation of the ak8 5′-utrs is shown in Additional file 1). The 5′-utrs of stpg2 (Fig. 1), a testis and one sperm ak8 (Fig. 2; Additional file 1) and estrogen receptor-alpha (erα) (Additional file 2) do not appear to present Y-box recognition motifs. These results are based on the following consensus sequence: [TAC][CA]CA[TC]C[ACT], where degenerate sites are bracketed [26].

Fig. 1

Identification of various different mRNA-processing control signals embedded within 5′-utrs of selected genes. Positions of recognition motifs for CREM, FOXL2A or Y-box are highlighted in yellow, blue or green, respectively. Other potential motifs with unknown binding partners are based on derivations of ACAA[CA]CA (purple), while others are more specific and duplicated at least twice within most 5′-utrs (purple and underlined)

Fig. 2

A comparison of the sperm and testis AK8-encoding transcripts and their distinct translated termini. a Potential binding elements for CREM (yellow), FOXL2A (blue) and Y-box (green) are presented. Various different recognition motifs that are duplicated throughout mRNA bodies may bind unknown regulatory proteins (purple). Note the 5′-end and internal differences between the sequences. Different translation start codons (ATG; bold green) are potentially engaged by each transcript. Hatched lines indicate sequence continues upstream or downstream. b Different N- and C-termini in sperm AK8 proteins could result from presentation of alternative start and stop codons (see Additional file 1 for more detail). Potential phosphorylation and myristoylation motifs in the sperm AK8N- and C-termini are highlighted in bold. Hatched lines indicate breaks in aligned residue sequences

Fig. 3

A comparison of the somatic and sperm gnrh2r 5′-utrs and coded N-termini. a The sperm gnrh2r 5′-utr is longer and different from the somatic isoform. The sperm 5′-utr contains potential CREM (yellow), FOXL2A (blue) and Y-box (green) binding elements. Repeated core sequences are shown for putative EREs (underlined) and other elements (purple) that could serve as recognition motifs for unknown binding partners. Note the different start codon positions (ATG; green). A potential overlapping FOXL2A/Y-box element may exist near the start codon of the somatic gnrh2r. b The shorter sperm GnRH-II-R N-terminal exposes a N-linked glycosylation site (NLSL; bold) that is internal to the somatic isoform. Hatched lines indicate sequence continues downstream

For CREB/CREM, we identified several near-perfect palindromic TGACGTCA elements [18] and many half-site motifs (TGACG or CGTCA) embedded in most of the 5′-utrs we examined. Only the 5′-utrs of spef2 (Fig. 1) and the sperm ak8s (Fig. 2; Additional file 1) do not contain sequence that resembles the palindromic CRE. Also, we wondered if factors such as ERα and FOXL2A, thought to bind RNA [16, 30], might be implicated in stage-specific processing and determined several mRNAs could bind FOXL2A (Figs. 1, 2 and 3) and ERα (Fig. 3; Additional file 2). Other signal elements repeated within or shared among the 5′-utrs were also identified (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). The spacing, orientation and sequence of these repeated motifs may specify regulatory protein binding sites.

We discovered that some genes expressed in the salmon sperm present utrs that diverge completely from their somatic counterparts. Differences in the utrs of various sperm mRNAs were verified by exon/intron examination of genomic sequences (Additional file 3). For example, we observed differences between the 5′-utrs borne by odfb3 in the testis and those within mature sperm. The sequence we present in Fig. 1 is expressed exclusively in the sperm odfb3 5′-utr. In 5′-utrs of odfb3 expressed in the testis (e.g. GenBank: GEGX01040900), we found no elements that follow the Y-box binding recognition sequence. This example suggests that regulation of the presentation of different 5′-utrs during specific stages of sperm maturation plays a role in the processing of these transcripts.

Adenylate kinases (AKs) play an important role in differentiating sperm by generating ATP (and AMP) and, in concert with other enzymes such as PDEs and sACs, in distributing adenylate fuel throughout the flagella [13]. We found three sperm ak8 genes that each present different 5′-utrs (Fig. 2a). In this analysis, we include the 5′-utr of a transcript that encodes AK8 from somatic tissues, including the testis. It is important to note that the testis 5′-utr is much longer than for the sperm ak8s and could generate a protein with a N-terminal that is 32 aar longer than the longest sperm isoform (Additional file 1). We have not determined if the mRNA is present in both testicular germinal and somatic cells, but the long 5′-utr may be part of a mechanism that serves to sequester the mRNA in sperm cells for utilization at later stages of differentiation.

If translated, the three sperm AK8 proteins would be shorter, and in two cases, the N- and C-termini would differ completely, from the somatic isoforms (Fig. 2b, Additional file 1). There are potential phosphorylation and myristoylation motifs in the sperm AK8 protein not present in the somatic isoform. The differences in the termini of the sperm AK isoforms might provide unique interfaces necessary for localization to specific structures within the sperm flagella. The eight known mammalian sperm AKs are found in association with mitochondria, the axoneme or ODFs, but the structural determinants for their specific localization are still unclear [13].

We also assume the characteristics of functional sperm AK8s would differ from that for the somatic isoforms. AK8 has two AK domains (see XP_014030300 for salmon, CDQ66442 for trout, or NP_001029046 for murine somatic forms), but the salmon sperm AK8 isoforms retain only one ATP-AMP binding pocket due to their shorter C-termini.

The 5′-utr of the sperm GnRH-II receptor (gnrh2r) (GenBank: GEGY01074481) differs completely from the salmon somatic isoform (GenBank: XM_014201129) (Fig. 3a). The 5′-utr in the sperm gnrh2r diverges from the somatic receptor in a region immediately preceding its start codon. The upstream portion contains a variety of potential binding motifs that may be inextricable for sperm-specific posttranscriptional processing. Also, despite the extended length of the sperm 5′-utr, the start codon is more downstream, leading to a shorter N-terminal in the translated product in comparison to the somatic isoform (Fig. 3b). The sequence that encodes the seven-transmembrane receptor is intact (data not shown), but the loss of N-terminal residues in the sperm isoform may free it to interact with specific structures in the sperm, or change the ligand affinity, selectivity or signaling function of the receptor for germ cell-specific activity.

We also found erα expressed in the sperm library. Analysis of fifteen other salmon libraries revealed 5′-utrs of variable lengths, with the longest borne in the liver library (Additional file 2). It is difficult to make any conclusions on the regulatory components of the erα 5′-utr in the sperm vis-à-vis other tissues where it is expressed, but potential for CREB/CREM and ER activity exists (Additional file 2).

Perhaps the most intriguing feature of the erα 5′-utr is that it contains two duplicate blocks of RNA, each approximately 47 nts in length (Additional file 2). These may contain motifs that recognize regulatory proteins that partition to only the liver, testis or sperm.


The recognition elements we present for CREB/CREM, ERα and FOXL2A are based on DNA-binding studies. Although some evidence exists that these proteins bind RNA, the sequences they interact with are completely unknown. The various duplicated sequences we identify within the 5′-utrs may serve as important targets for proteins involved in regulating mRNA processing. Similar duplicated elements are found throughout the 5′-utrs of late-stage mammalian sperm mRNAs (Additional file 4). Future research will reveal if similarities exist within the composition, binding contexts and interactions of the proteins that regulate expression of these essential mRNAs.



amino acid residue


adenylate kinase


cyclic AMP


cAMP response element binding protein


cAMP response element modulator


estrogen receptor-alpha


forkhead box L2




outer dense fibers




soluble adenylyl cyclase


untranslated region


  1. 1.

    Laoide BM, Foulkes NS, Schlotter F, Sassone-Corsi P. The functional versatility of CREM is determined by its modular structure. EMBO J. 1993;12(3):1179–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hogan DJ, Riordan DP, Gerber AP, Herschlag D, Brown PO. Diverse RNA-binding proteins interact with functionally related sets of RNAs, suggesting an extensive regulatory system. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(10):e255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chennathukuzhi V, Morales CR, El-Alfy M, Hecht NB. The kinesin KIF17b and RNA-binding protein TB-RBP transport specific cAMP-responsive element modulator-regulated mRNAs in male germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(26):15566–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Idler RK, Yan W. Control of messenger RNA fate by RNA-binding proteins: an emphasis on mammalian spermatogenesis. J Androl. 2012;33(3):309–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kleene KC. Connecting cis-elements and trans-factors with mechanisms of developmental regulation of mRNA translation in meiotic and haploid mammalian spermatogenic cells. Reproduction. 2013;146(1):R1–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cullinane DL, Chowdhury TA, Kleene KC. Mechanisms of translational repression of the Smcp mRNA in round spermatids. Reproduction. 2015;149(1):43–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Inaba K. Molecular architecture of the sperm flagella: molecules for motility and signaling. Zoolog Sci. 2003;20(9):1043–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    San Agustin JT, Witman GB. Differential expression of the C(s) and Calpha1 isoforms of the catalytic subunit of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase testicular cells. Biol Reprod. 2001;65(1):151–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krisfalusi M, Miki K, Magyar PL, O’Brien DA. Multiple glycolytic enzymes are tightly bound to the fibrous sheath of mouse spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2006;75(2):270–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Danshina PV, Geyer CB, Dai Q, Goulding EH, Willis WD, Kitto GB, McCarrey JR, Eddy EM, O’Brien DA. Phosphoglycerate kinase 2 (PGK2) is essential for sperm function and male fertility in mice. Biol Reprod. 2010;82(1):136–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    von Schalburg KR, Gowen BE, Leong JS, Rondeau EB, Davidson WS, Koop BF. Subcellular localization and characterization of estrogenic pathway regulators and mediators in Atlantic salmon spermatozoal cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149(1):75–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly Sequence Database. Accessed 23 May 2016.

  13. 13.

    Vadnais ML, Cao W, Aghajanian HK, Haig-Ladewig L, Lin AM, Al-Alao O, Gerton GL. Adenine nucleotide metabolism and a role for AMP in modulating flagellar waveforms in mouse sperm. Biol Reprod. 2014;90(6):128, 1–14.

  14. 14.

    Biology Workbench. Accessed 23 May 2016.

  15. 15.

    Cartharius K, Frech K, Grote K, Klocke B, Haltmeier M, Klingenhoff A, Frisch M, Bayerlein M, Werner T. MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(13):2933–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    von Schalburg KR, Yasuike M, Davidson WS, Koop BF. Regulation, expression and characterization of aromatase (cyp19b1) transcripts in ovary and testis of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;155(2):118–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    von Schalburg KR, Gowen BE, Rondeau EB, Johnson NW, Minkley DR, Leong JS, Davidson WS, Koop BF. Sex-specific expression, synthesis and localization of aromatase regulators in one-year-old Atlantic salmon ovaries and testes. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;164(4):236–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kimmins S, Kotaja N, Davidson I, Sassone-Corsi P. Testis-specific transcription mechanisms promoting male germ-cell differentiation. Reproduction. 2004;128(1):5–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Artimo P, Jonnalagedda M, Arnold K, Baratin D, Csardi G, de Castro E, Duvaud S, Flegel V, Fortier A, Gasteiger E, Grosdidier A, Hernandez C, Ioannidis V, Kuznetsov D, Liechti R, Moretti S, Mostaguir K, Redaschi N, Rossier G, Xenarios I, Stockinger H. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(W1):W597–603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lien S, et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature. 2016;533(7602):200–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kent WJ. BLAT—the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002;12(4):656–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, Rajput B, Robbertse B, Smith-White B, Ako-Adjei D, Astashyn A, Badretdin A, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D733–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yang J, Medvedev S, Reddi PP, Schultz RM, Hecht NB. The DNA/RNA-binding protein MSY2 marks specific transcripts for cytoplasmic storage in mouse male germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(5):1513–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chowdhury TA, Kleene KC. Identification of potential regulatory elements in the 5′ and 3′ UTRs of 12 translationally regulated mRNAs in mammalian spermatids by comparative genomics. J Androl. 2012;33(2):244–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Meikar O, Vagin VV, Chalmel F, Sõstar K, Lardenois A, Hammell M, Jin Y, Da Ros M, Wasik KA, Toppari J, Hannon GJ, Kotaja N. An atlas of chromatoid body components. RNA. 2014;20(4):483–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jodar M, Sendler E, Krawetz SA. The protein and transcript profiles of human semen. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363(1):85–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Schuster A, Tang C, Xie Y, Ortogero N, Yuan S, Yan W. SpermBase: a database for sperm-borne RNA contents. Biol Reprod. 2016;95(5):99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lalli E, Ohe K, Hindelang C, Sassone-Corsi P. Orphan receptor DAX-1 is a shuttling RNA binding protein associated with polyribosomes via mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(13):4910–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

KRVS conceived the project and drafted the manuscript, KRVS and EBR performed transcript and genome analysis, JSL assembled and analyzed the sperm library, BFK and WSD provided scientific input and resources. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We would like to thank Brent Gowen for his work in determining the expression of CREB/CREM, ERα and FOXL2A in the flagella of salmon sperm (Electron Microscopy Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

The data supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The datasets are publicly available under NCBI TSA records GEGX00000000 for testis, GEGY00000000 for sperm and GBRB00000000 for remaining libraries.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.


This research was supported by a Natural Resources and Applied Sciences Team Grant from the B.C. Innovation Council (WSD, BFK) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (BFK, WSD).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristian R. von Schalburg.

Additional files

Additional file 1.

A comparison of the sperm and testis AK8-encoding transcripts and their protein products. a Different recognition motifs embedded within 5’-utrs of sperm and testis ak8 transcripts are presented: CREB/CREM (yellow), FOXL2A (blue) and unknown binding partners (purple). Three canonical Y-box motifs are present upstream of the start codons of two sperm ak8 transcripts (green blocks). (Also see Fig. 2). Note the 5’-end and internal differences between the sequences. Different start codons (ATG; bold green) are potentially engaged by each transcript. b Insertion of multiple short exons in the coding region of the sperm transcript (see Additional file 3) could result in a truncated C-terminal (double stop codons in red). c Divergence of utrs expressed by late-stage sperm genes can change the translated N- or C-terminals from those presented by their somatic counterparts. Potential PKC phosphorylation ([ST]-X-[RK]: positions 3–6) and myristoylation (GTCIAS: see start of distinct C-termini) motifs in the sperm AK8 proteins are shown that are not present in the somatic isoform (bold). Hatched lines indicate sequence continues upstream or downstream.

Additional file 2.

Alignment and characterization of erα 5’-ends. a Alignments of erα transcripts from various libraries revealed 5’-utrs of variable lengths. We provide examples of 5’-utrs of differing lengths from the liver (GenBank:GBRB01032530), the testis (GenBank:GEGX01021095) and the sperm (GenBank:GEGY01192247). b The erα 5’-utr contains two duplicate blocks of RNA that each possess a less homologous stretch of 25 nts (85.7%) (underlined), followed by a stretch of 22 nts that are essentially identical (bold). Note that the upstream duplicated block of RNA may only be present in the liver erα 5’-utr. Positions of potential EREs (underlined) and CREs (yellow) are also presented. Two interesting estrogen (or other hormone) response element configurations are located immediately downstream of the start codon (ATG; bold). Two duplicated elements of RNA (purple) could also serve as binding motifs for FOXL2A.

Additional file 3.

Genome coordinates for RefSeq and assembled transcripts. a Genomic coordinates of the 5’-utr for transcripts of interest. b Genomic coordinates for full transcripts including 5’-utr, exons and 3’-utr.

Additional file 4.

Identification of various potential processing control signals within 5’-utrs of mammalian sperm-specific mRNAs. Positions of recognition motifs for CREB/CREM, FOXL2 or Y-box are highlighted in yellow, blue or green, respectively. Of ten known CREM-dependent mammalian sperm mRNAs [3, 26], nine contain imperfect CREs in their 5’-utrs. Potential motifs with unknown binding partners that are duplicated at least twice within 5’-utrs are also shown (purple and/or underlined). A specific element (CCTGCT in bold) is found at least once in each of the four mRNAs that encode chromatin-restructuring factors (except tnp1). At least two GC-rich elements in spata18 may serve as recognition elements for a similar protein (bold).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Schalburg, K.R., Rondeau, E.B., Leong, J.S. et al. Regulatory processes that control haploid expression of salmon sperm mRNAs. BMC Res Notes 11, 639 (2018).

Download citation


  • 5′-untranslated regions
  • Gene expression
  • Localization motifs
  • Messenger RNA
  • Posttranscriptional processing
  • Recognition elements
  • Spermiogenesis