Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Transcriptomic evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying abscission deficiency in the Arabidopsis mutants haesa/haesa-like 2 and nevershed

BMC Research Notes201811:754

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3864-x

  • Received: 14 August 2018
  • Accepted: 17 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

In Arabidopsis, the abscission of floral organs is regulated by two related receptor-like protein kinases, HAESA and HAESA–like 2 (HAE/HSL2). Signaling by HAE/HSL2 leads to expression of genes encoding secreted cell wall remodeling and hydrolase enzymes. hae hsl2 mutants fail to induce expression of these genes and retain floral organs indefinitely. Mutants in the gene NEVERSHED (NEV) also fail to abscise floral organs and phenotypically resemble hae hsl2. NEV encodes an ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein that localizes to the trans-Golgi network and early endosome. nev displays altered Golgi morphology and aberrations in vesicular trafficking. The mechanism by which nev fails to abscise is presently unknown. It has been hypothesized that nev fails to activate HAE/HSL2 signaling. In this study we use RNA-Sequencing to test this hypothesis.

Results

We show that the transcriptional alterations in hae hsl2 and nev are highly divergent. hae hsl2 displays a clear reduction in expression of genes associated with cell wall remodeling and pectin degradation, while nev displays vast transcriptional changes associated with response to pathogens. These results suggest that the mechanism of the defect between hae hsl2 and nev are distinct.

Keywords

  • Abscission
  • HAESA
  • HAESA-LIKE2
  • NEVERSHED

Introduction

In plants, abscission is the programmed shedding of entire organs resulting from environmental stimuli or an endogenous developmental program. Post-pollination abscission of sepals, petals, and stamen in Arabidopsis has emerged as an important model developmental signaling system. Floral abscission is regulated by the redundant receptor protein kinases HAESA and HAESA-LIKE 2 [1, 2]. Double hae/hsl2 mutants fail to activate an intracellular signaling pathway controlling abscission and their floral organs fail to abscise [1, 3].

In addition to plants defective in the HAE/HSL2 signaling pathway, mutants in the ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating Protein (Arf-GAP) encoding NEVERSHED display a strong abscission defect [4]. Analysis of floral abscission zone cells shows that these nev mutants display aberrant Golgi morphology and over-accumulation of paramural vesicles, suggesting disruption of the secretory system [4]. The exact molecular defect causing abscission deficiency in the nev mutant is not known. It has been hypothesized that nev may fail to activate intracellular signaling mediated by HAE/HSL2 [5]. In this study, we utilized RNA-sequencing to compare the transcriptome of a hae hsl2 mutant and a nev mutant in order to test this hypothesis.

Main text

Materials and methods

Lines used in this study

The nev-3 mutant, isolated in Ler and outcrossed to Col-0, and the nev-3 serk1-5 suppressor in the outcrossed nev-3 background were kindly provided by Dr. Sarah Liljegren [4, 6]. hae-3 hsl2-3 has been previously described, and is deposited at ABRC.

Plant growth conditions

Plant were grown in a 16 h light cycle, ~ 700 lx, at 22 °C, ~ 65% relative humidity, and fertilized once at 3 weeks post-germination with 1 × strength Miracle-Gro (Scotts Miracle-Gro Company).

RNA-sequencing analysis

A minimum of 8 and maximum of 15 mid-stage 15 floral receptacles were isolated and pooled per biological replicate. Three biological replicates per genotype were prepared in each experiment. RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). Each receptacle was dissected by taking a 1 mm section of floral tissue comprised of 1/3 mm stem and 2/3 mm receptacle. Libraries were created using the TruSeq mRNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina). Libraries from each experiment were individually barcoded, pooled, and run on a single lane of Illumina Sequencing using the NextSeq 500 instrument.

Reads were mapped to The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) 10 gene sequences and quantified using TopHat (v. 2.9) and Cufflinks (v2.1.1) [7]. We utilized default settings for alignments, and performed differential expression analyses using cuffdiff with default settings. Data were analyzed and visualized in R using CummeRbund and ggplot2 [7]. GO analysis was performed utilizing AgriGo [8]. Differential expression was chosen to denote an FDR < .05 from cufflinks output.

Results

RNA-sequencing of abscission deficient mutants hae-3 hsl2-3 and nev-3

nev mutants are abscission deficient and resemble hae hsl2 where floral organs remain strongly attached to the developing fruit [4] (Fig. 1a). To investigate the potential mechanistic relationship between these two mutants, we performed RNA-Sequencing comparing wildtype Col-0 and the two previously described abscission deficient mutants hae-3 hsl2-3 and nev-3 [4, 9]. In this study, we sampled RNA derived from mid-stage 15 floral receptacles. Stage 15 is the floral developmental stage where pollination has occurred and abscission signaling has been initiated, but floral abscission has not been completed [3] (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

RNA-Sequencing of hae hsl2 and nev. a Abscission phenotype of wildtype Col-0, hae-3 hsl2-3, and nev-3. b Transcript abundance measurements for abscission associated polygalacturonase genes. Points represent FPKM values per individual replicates of the indicated genotype. Asterisks below represent statistical significance at FDR < .05. c Heatmap of differentially expressed genes between Col-0, hae-3 hsl2-3, and nev-3

After RNA-Sequencing, we assessed transcript abundance measurements for genes known to be regulated by HAE/HSL2 [output of differential expression analysis for RNA-Sequencing experiments included in Additional file 2: Dataset 1. Previous studies have identified two genes encoding secreted polygalacturonases QRT2 and PGAZAT with a partially abscission defective double mutant phenotype and whose expression is regulated by HAE/HSL2 [3, 10]. These genes are hypothesized to contribute to the loosening of the cell wall at the site of abscission [11]. While these genes are a non-exhaustive sample of those likely regulated by HAE/HSL2, they serve as a reliable indicator or pathway activity. Their transcript abundance measurements are plotted in Fig. 1b.

The results confirm a significant reduction in hae-3 hsl2-3 in comparison to Col-0 for both QRT2 and PGAZAT (Fig. 1b). In contrast, nev-3 showed a transcript abundance level statistically similar to wildtype for QRT2, but a dramatic > 8 fold increase in PGAZAT transcript abundance. These data suggest that, unlike hae-3 hsl2-3, nev-3 does not exhibit generally reduced abscission signaling, but surprisingly exhibits strong and apparently dysregulated expression of key HAE/HSL2 regulated genes.

Global differential expression and gene ontology (GO) analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences of 1055 and 326 genes in the Col-high/hae-3 hsl2-3-low and Col-low/hae-3 hsl2-3-high comparisons, respectively. GO analysis identified moderate enrichment in terms such as response to stimulus, response to stress, cell wall, and other terms similar to those previously associated with gene expression changes in the hae hsl2 mutant [full results for all GO analyses included in Additional file 3: Dataset 2. In contrast, nev-3 shows evidence of dramatic transcriptional reprogramming, with 4627 and 4753 statistically significantly different genes in the Col-high/nev-3-low and Col-low/nev-3-high comparisons, and 4861 and 5079 statistically significantly different genes in the hae-3 hsl2-3-high/nev-3-low and hae-3 hsl2-3-low/nev-3-high comparisons. A heat map displaying relative levels of all differentially expressed genes between the three genotypes is displayed in Fig. 1c. GO analysis of genes with higher expression in nev identified extremely significant enrichment of terms such response to stress, response to biotic stimulus, kinase activity, cell death, and other terms associated with response to biotic stress. There is less of a clear pattern to the terms enriched in genes in the Col-high/nev-3 low comparison. Potentially informative terms include lipid metabolic process and endomembrane system.

Overall, these results are surprising in that the pattern of abscission associated polygalacturonase gene expression in nev-3 bears little resemblance to that of hae-3 hsl2-3. There also appears to be general transcriptional reprogramming in the nev mutant and over-activation of pathogen response signaling. These results suggest the mechanism of abscission defect in nev is dissimilar to that of hae hsl2.

RNA-sequencing of nev-3 and nev-3 serk1-5

Results of a nev suppressor screen have shown that loss of function mutations of SERK1 are capable of suppressing the abscission defect and subcellular Golgi defects of nev [6] (Fig. 2a). SERK1, along with the related SERK2, SERK3/BAK1, and SERK4, have been shown to positively regulated abscission by encoding HAE/HSL2 co-receptors [12, 13]. It has not been clear how mutating a positive regulator of abscission signaling can suppress the nev abscission defect.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

RNA-Sequencing of nev and nev serk1. a Abscission phenotype of nev-3 and nev-3 serk1-5. b Transcript abundance measurements for abscission associated polygalacturonase genes. Points represent FPKM values per individual replicates of the indicated genotype. Asterisks below represent statistical significance at FDR < .05 for the indicated comparisons. c Plot of linear regression modelling log2(fold change) of Col-0/nev-3 measurement against nev-3/nev-3 serk1-5 gene expression measurements

Considering the results of the nev RNA-Seq experiment above, we hypothesized there may be a SERK1 regulated signaling pathway over-activated in nev that leads to transcriptional reprogramming and that interferes with abscission by an unknown mechanism. We further hypothesized that mutating SERK1 may lead to suppression of the abscission defect of nev by reducing signal strength of this pathway. To test this hypothesis, we performed RNA-Sequencing to compare nev-3 to the previously described double loss of function suppressor mutant nev-3 serk1-5 [6].

We first examined expression of QRT2 and PGAZAT. nev-3 serk1-5 displays a slightly lower level of transcript abundance for QRT2, and a > 5 fold reduction in transcript abundance of PGAZAT (Fig. 2b). These data are consistent with a model whereby mutation in SERK1 suppresses the dysregulated expression in nev-3.

We further performed global gene expression analysis and GO term enrichment in a similar manner as above. We observed 4756 genes with a statistically significantly higher transcript abundance in nev-3 compared to nev-3 serk1-5, and 4848 genes with a lower transcript abundance in nev-3 compared to nev-3 serk1-5. GO term analysis of genes with higher levels in nev-3 compared to nev-3 serk1-5 shows that the top terms in the Biological Process category include response to stimulus, response to stress, multi-organism process, cell death, and other terms associated with biotic stress response (Additional file 2: Dataset 2). 8 of the top 10 terms in this comparison are identical to those in the top 10 Biological Process terms associated with genes higher in nev-3 compared to Col-0. These data suggest that in nev-3 serk1-5, there is a reduction in an intracellular signaling pathway and are consistent with a model where the defect of nev is caused by over-activation of SERK1 signaling.

Finally, to test the hypothesis that mutation of SERK1 can reverse gene expression changes in nev, we performed linear regression on the log(fold change) values from the Col-0/nev-3 comparison versus those from the nev-3/nev-3 serk1-5 comparison. We hypothesized that we would observe an inverse relationship between these log(fold change) measurements. Consistent with this expectation, we observe a highly statistically significant negative relationship, indicating that gene expression changes in nev-3 compared to wildtype tend to be offset in nev-3 serk1-5 (Fig. 2c). This result is further consistent with the hypothesis that mutation of SERK1 reduces the signal strength of the over-active signaling process in nev.

Conclusion

Overall, these data suggest that in nev-3 there is over-activation of SERK1 mediated signaling that leads to widespread transcriptional reprogramming and consequent cellular dysfunction in the abscission zone, leading to an abscission defect. Mutation of SERK1 likely reduces the strength of this over-activated signal and allows abscission to occur. Determination of what effect this mis-regulated signaling has on abscission zone function is a direction for future research. One possibility was illuminated by a recent report demonstrating that floral abscission zone cells exhibit a regulated lignification pattern, and that the nev mutant exhibits disorganized and ectopic lignification [14]. It is possible this ectopic lignification underlies the phenotype of nev, perhaps by interfering with the normal cell separation processes that occur as a result of the modification of abscission zone cell walls and dissolution of the middle lamella. In this scenario, the nev phenotype and associated transcriptomic changes could occur by activation of SERK1 signaling that aberrantly feeds into a lignification pathway, as well as pathways regulating abscission related hydrolases such as PGAZAT and pathogen response genes. This model presumes the inhibitory effect on abscission of ectopic lignification overrides the effect of strong abscission hydrolase expression. This model will require substantial additional detailed genetic and physiological investigation. However, its strength is that it offers an explanation for two counter-intuitive properties of the nev mutant: that nev exhibits high levels of expression of hydrolase genes such as PGAZAT and QRT2, and that the nev phenotype can be suppressed by mutation of SERK1, a positive regulator of abscission signaling [4, 6].

Limitations

In this paper we show that the nev mutant exhibits widespread transcriptional reprogramming, including a stark increase in pathogen response gene expression, and that reducing this transcriptional response by mutating SERK1 suppresses the abscission defect of nev. However, this work does not provide a fundamental physiological explanation for why nev does not abscise, nor does it point to a mechanism by which SERK1 signaling is activated in the nev mutant. It only presents evidence at the transcriptional level that the mechanism of abscission deficiency between hae hsl2 and nev appears to be quite distinct. Further work on the nev mutant and its suppressors will be required to more fully understand this phenomenon.

Abbreviations

HAE: 

HAESA

HSL2: 

HAESA-LIKE 2

NEV: 

NEVERSHED

SERK1: 

somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase 1

PGAZAT: 

polygalacturonase from the abscission zone of Arabidopsis thaliana

QRT2: 

QUARTET2

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

IWT and JCW designed the experiments. IWT performed the experiments. IWT wrote the paper. JCW oversaw the work. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Sarah Liljegren for kindly providing seed of nev-3 and nev-3 serk1-5 and the MU DNA Core for Illumina Sequencing services.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

BAM files have been deposited at Sequence Read Archive under BioProject Accession PRJNA430092 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA430092/).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
(2)
Interdisciplinary Plant Group, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
(3)
Department of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
(4)
Present address: Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA

References

  1. Cho SK, Larue CT, Chevalier D, Wang H, Jinn T-L, Zhang S, et al. Regulation of floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(40):15629–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Stenvik G-E, Tandstad NM, Guo Y, Shi C-L, Kristiansen W, Holmgren A, et al. The EPIP peptide of INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION is sufficient to induce abscission in Arabidopsis through the receptor-like kinases HAESA and HAESA-LIKE2. Plant Cell. 2008;20(7):1805–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Niederhuth CE, Patharkar OR, Walker JC. Transcriptional profiling of the Arabidopsis abscission mutant hae hsl2 by RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Liljegren SJ, Leslie ME, Darnielle L, Lewis MW, Taylor SM, Luo R, et al. Regulation of membrane trafficking and organ separation by the NEVERSHED ARF-GAP protein. Development. 2009;136(11):1909–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Liljegren SJ. Organ abscission: exit strategies require signals and moving traffic. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526612001252. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
  6. Lewis MW, Leslie ME, Fulcher EH, Darnielle L, Healy PN, Youn J-Y, et al. The SERK1 receptor-like kinase regulates organ separation in Arabidopsis flowers. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 2010;62(5):817–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(suppl_2):W64–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Niederhuth CE, Cho SK, Seitz K, Walker JC. Letting go is never easy: abscission and receptor-like protein kinases. J Integr Plant Biol. 2013;55(12):1251–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ogawa M, Kay P, Wilson S, Swain SM. ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE1 (ADPG1), ADPG2, and QUARTET2 are polygalacturonases required for cell separation during reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21(1):216–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Patharkar OR, Walker JC. Advances in abscission signaling. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(4):733–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Meng X, Zhou J, Tang J, Li B, de Oliveira MV, Chai J, et al. Ligand-induced receptor-like kinase complex regulates floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2016;14(6):1330–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Santiago J, Brandt B, Wildhagen M, Hohmann U, Hothorn LA, Butenko MA, et al. Mechanistic insight into a peptide hormone signaling complex mediating floral organ abscission. Elife. 2016;5:e15075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee Y, Yoon TH, Lee J, Jeon SY, Lee JH, Lee MK, et al. A lignin molecular brace controls precision processing of cell walls critical for surface integrity in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2018;173(6):1468–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement