Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Healthcare workers knowledge and diagnostic practices: a need for dengue and chikungunya training in Moshi Municipality, Kilimanjaro Tanzania

BMC Research Notes201912:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4074-x

  • Received: 6 December 2018
  • Accepted: 11 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

Dengue and chikungunya virus diseases are becoming an increasingly important global health threats and are continuously expanding their geographical range. The study aims to investigate knowledge and diagnostic practice of dengue and chikungunya fever among healthcare workers in Moshi Municipality.

Results

Most of healthcare workers heard of chikungunya and dengue 146 (71.2%) and 203 (99%) respectively. Ninety-five (46.3%) and 152 (74.1%) had good knowledge regard chikungunya and dengue respectively. One hundred and twenty-two of HCWs 122 (59.5%) reported that there is no vaccination for dengue virus. Most HCWs 199 (97.0%) reported that the absence of diagnostic tool for dengue virus lead to difficult in managing the infection. The finding of this study showed that there is insufficient knowledge regarding chikungunya while knowledge regarding dengue is relatively fair. This calls for training regarding these infections.

Keywords

  • Dengue
  • Chikungunya
  • Knowledge
  • Diagnostic practices
  • Tanzania

Introduction

Chikungunya and dengue are currently among the important Arbovirus. Chikungunya fever is caused by the chikungunya virus of the family Togaviridae and genus Alphavirus and dengue fever is caused by the virus of the genus Flavivirus the family Flaviviridae. Both infections are transmitted between human by the bite of infected Aedes aegypti and to a less extent Aedes albopictus [13]. Dengue has rapidly spread in all World Health Organization (WHO) regions in recent years [4]. It is estimated that over 50% of the world’s population is at risk of dengue infection [4], with prediction of almost 400 million dengue infections occurring each year [5]. Notwithstanding increasing reports of chikungunya infections in different parts of the world, detailed information on the global population at risk remains sparse, however it is estimated that 1.5 billion of the world population is at risk of chikungunya infection [6], with 2 million infections annually [7].

Given the time when dengue-like illness were detected, one would expect adequate knowledge on diagnostic practices of this disease among health care workers (HCWs). However, studies indicate that understanding and diagnosing dengue vary considerably. For example, a study done in government and private hospitals as well as clinics in Karachi indicated that 100% of the doctors were aware about dengue viral infection but lack knowledge about its diagnosis (72%) and management, while 50% of doctors wanted to isolate the patient [8]. Another study reported that a large number of physicians lacked knowledge of the probable diagnosis of dengue and the appropriate time to discharge the patients [9]. A recent systematic review found that risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals vary across populations and countries and knowledge is higher in areas that have experienced an outbreak [10].

Although dengue and chikungunya are reported to prevail in Tanzania [1114], challenges in diagnosing dengue and chikungunya are still reported in Tanzania [13, 1518]. Previous research focused on status of exposure to dengue and chikungunya viruses; however, there have been few attempts to date to better understand the knowledge, attitude and practices among HCWs. These studies have been conducted mainly in Kilosa Morogoro [19] and Hai Kilimanjaro [20]; to our knowledge, no studies to date have been conducted in Moshi, Kilimanjaro.

Tanzania has seen a surge of dengue infections since 2010, therefore, there is increasing need for skilled HCWs in managing dengue. Understanding how HCWs manage suspected cases of dengue is crucial to improving patient outcomes. HCWs who interact directly with patients have an important role in both treating and preventing the spread of dengue [21]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine knowledge and diagnostic practices regarding dengue and chikungunya among HCW in health facilities in Moshi Municipality.

Main text

Material methods

A descriptive cross sectional was conducted in Moshi Municipality in Kilimanjaro region from March to May 2017. Moshi municipality is one of the districts in Kilimanjaro region located at the lower slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro in Northern part of Tanzania. There are 56 health facilities in Moshi Municipal. A total of 15-health facilities both public and private were randomly selected. Public health facilities are Bondeni dispensary, Chuo Cha Polisi health centre, Majengo health centre, Njoro dispensary, Shirimatunda dispensary, Pasua Health centre, Rau dispensary and Mawenzi hospital. Private health facilities are Mary land health centre, Moshi-Arusha hospital, Shanti Town Dispensary, St Joseph hospital, Upendo Health centre, YMCA dispensary and CRCT Kilimanjaro First Health.

The sampling technique for this study was non-probability convenience sampling. In this technique the HCWs that were present in particular health facility at the time of data collection were interviewed after consultation with the head of heath facility.

Face to face interviews were conducted using structured questionnaires with questions specifically designed for HCWs. Interviews were conducted in English and Swahili language.

The study instrument was developed following an extensive review of the literature. The questionnaire was pretested among two separate groups of 5 residents in Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College and nurses who were excluded from the main study. Inputs from the residents were then used to refine the questionnaire. The questionnaire covered the following areas: (1) demographic information (facility, sex, age and occupation), (2) health information relating to whether the respondent had heard chikungunya and dengue disease or not, (3) knowledge about chikungunya and dengue symptoms, signs, and transmission modes, (4) diagnosis and treatment of chikungunya and dengue.

Knowledge of dengue and chikungunya was quantified using knowledge score as described by Itral et al. and Al-zurfi et al. with few modifications [22, 23]. For HCWs, good knowledge was assessed as participants answered questions correctly pertaining to signs, symptoms, and diagnostic practices for dengue and chikungunya. Correct answers for knowledge item were coded as “10” while incorrect answers were coded as “0”. The total knowledge ranged from 0 to 100 with scores of ≥ 40 or higher being considered as “good” and < 40 and below being considered as “poor”.

Statistical analyses

Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Descriptive statistics are presented as proportions for categorical data. Mean knowledge score was calculated using student t test. Univariate analysis was performed by logistic regression. A significance level of ≤ 0.05 was used throughout.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of studied population

A total of 205 HCWs were included in the study. Half of the HCWs were from the health centres (105/205: 51.2%), while majority (128/205; 62.4%) were male. A hundred and five (51.2%) were aged between 31 and 40 years, (82/205:40.0%) were nurses. More than half of HCWs (112/205: 54.6%) had a work experience of 5 to 10 years.

Knowledge and treatment regarding chikungunya and dengue

Of 205 HCWs, majority (146/205; 71.2%) had heard chikungunya fever virus, and among these, only (85/205; 41.5%) heard through other people (such as friends and neighbours). Few HCWs (80/205; 39.0%) reported that chikungunya is caused by virus while others (44/205; 21.0%) wrongly reported that chikungunya is caused by parasites. Seventy-six (37.1%) of the HCWs answered that the main symptom of chikungunya is muscle pain and almost all HCWs (192/205; 93.7%) reported that not all mosquitoes transmit chikungunya. Eighty-five (41.8%) reported the vector that transmitting this virus is Aedes mosquito and (57/205; 27.8%) knew that the infection is transmitted through Culex mosquito. Few participants (38/205; 18.5%), knew that the mosquito which chikungunya virus bite during the day time. A number of the HCWs correctly reported that chikungunya virus infections are transmitted by the same vector as yellow fever virus, (40/205; 19.5%) while (37/205; 18.1%) correctly answered that chikungunya virus infections are transmitted by the same vector as Zika virus. About half of HCWs knew that the drug that is used to treat patients infected with chikungunya virus is Anti-pain (102/205; 49.8%) Table 1.
Table 1

Knowledge regarding chikungunya and dengue infections among healthcare workers

Variable

Chikungunya (N = 205)

Dengue (N = 205)

n (%)

n (%)

Have you heard about these infections?

Yes

146 (71.2)

203 (99.0)

No

59 (28.8)

2 (1.0)

Where did you heard of (infections)?

Media

31 (15.1)

138 (67.3)

Books

28 (13.7)

38 (18.5)

People

85 (41.5)

27 (13.2)

Othersa

2 (1.0)

0 (0.0)

Never heard

59 (28.8)

2 (1.0)

What is the causative agent?

Fungi

2 (1.0)

0 (0.0)

Bacteria

19 (9.3)

17 (8.3)

Virus

80 (39.0)

106 (51.7)

Parasites

44 (21.0)

80 (39.0)

Don’t know

60 (29.3)

2 (1.0)

What are the symptoms of an infection?

Muscle pain

76 (37.1)

116 (56.6)

Vomiting

45 (21.9)

53 (25.9)

Diarrhoea

23 (11.2)

31 (15.1)

All

2 (1.0)

3 (1.5)

Don’t know

59 (28.8)

2 (1.0)

Are all mosquitoes transmitting infection?

Yes

3 (1.5)

3 (1.5)

No

192 (93.7)

201 (98.0)

Don’t know

10 (4.9)

1 (0.5)

Way of transmit infection

Anopheles

3 (1.5)

8 (3.9)

Culex

57 (27.8)

64 (31.2)

AedesMosquitoes

85 (41.8)

130 (63.4)

Don’t know

60 (29.3)

3 (1.5)

At what time do the mosquitoes that transmit these infections bite?

Night time

11 (5.4)

9 (4.4)

Day time

38 (18.5)

69 (33.7)

Both day and night

81 (39.5)

102 (49.8)

Don’t know

75 (36.6)

25 (12.3)

Which virus/parasite is transmitted by the same vector as chikungunya or/dengue

Yellow fever virus

40 (19.5)

52 (25.4)

Malaria parasite

13 (6.4)

12 (5.9)

Zika virus

37 (18.1)

63 (30.7)

Rift valley fever virus

25 (12.2)

37 (18.0)

Don’t know

57 (27.7)

4 (2.0)

A patient with which types of symptoms are supposed to be admitted in hospital?

With severe symptoms

52 (25.4)

85 (41.4)

Without symptoms

108 (52.6)

110 (53.7)

Don’t know

3 (1.5)

7 (3.4)

What drug(s) are used for treatment

Anti-pain

102 (49.8)

151 (73.7)

Antimalarial

10 (4.9)

10 (4.9)

Antiviral

35 (17.1)

38 (18.5)

Don’t know

58 (28.3)

6 (2.9)

aSuch as internet

Almost all HCWs (203/205; 99.0%) heard dengue fever, among these (138/205; 67.3%) heard through media. Half of HCWs (106/205; 51.7%) correctly reported that dengue fever is caused by virus while (80/205; 39.0%) wrongly reported that dengue fever is caused by parasites. One hundred and sixteen (56.6%) of the HCWs answered that the main symptom of dengue fever is muscle pain and almost all HCWs (201/205; 98.0%) reported that not all mosquitoes transmit dengue virus. More than half (130/205; 63.4%) correctly reported that Aedes mosquito transmit dengue while (64/205; 31.2%) wrongly reported that the infection is transmitted through Culex mosquito. Few HCWs (69/205; 33.7%), knew that the mosquito which transmit dengue virus bite during the day time. A number of the HCWs correctly reported that dengue virus infections are transmitted by the same vector as yellow fever virus, (52/205; 25.4%) while (63/205; 30.7%) correctly answered that dengue virus infections are transmitted by the same vector as Zika virus. More than half of HCWs knew that the drug that is used to treat patients infected with dengue virus is Anti-pain (151/205; 73.7%) Table 1.

Knowledge score difference regarding dengue and chikungunya among HCWs in Moshi Municipality

Among the HCWs, few participants (95/205; 46.3%) had good knowledge with regarding to chikungunya fever (knowledge score of 40 and above) with the mean knowledge score of (Mean ± SD) 31.7 ± 18.9. Also 152 (74.1%) had good dengue knowledge score with the mean knowledge score of (Mean ± SD) 43.6 ± 13.2 Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Mean knowledge regarding chikungunya and dengue fever

Diagnostic practices regarding chikungunya and dengue

HCWs were asked several questions concerning diagnostic practices of chikungunya and dengue in the health facilities. Most of HCWs (123/205; 60%) didn’t know if there is vaccine for chikungunya virus while (77/205 37.6%) reported absence of vaccine for chikungunya. Two (1.0%) reported that there diagnostic tools for chikungunya and almost all HCWs (195/205; 95.1%) reported that the absence of diagnostic tools for chikungunya virus lead to difficulties in managing the infection (Table 2).
Table 2

Diagnostic practices regarding chikungunya and dengue infection among healthcare workers (N = 205)

Variable

Chikungunya

Dengue

n (%)

n (%)

Is there a vaccine for (Chikungunya or Dengue infection)?

Yes

5 (2.5)

18 (8.8)

No

77 (37.6)

122 (59.5)

Don’t know

123 (60.0)

65 (31.7)

Is there any tools for laboratory diagnosis of (Chikungunya or Dengue infection)?

Yes

80 (39.0)

105 (51.3)

No

24 (11.7)

46 (22.4)

Don’t know

101 (49.3)

54 (26.3)

In your facility, do you have diagnostic tools for (Chikungunya or Dengue infection)?

Yes

2 (1.0)

3 (1.5)

No

203 (99.0)

202 (98.5)

Absences diagnostic lead to difficulties in managing the infections

Yes

195 (95.1)

199 (97.0)

No

0 (0.0)

3 (1.5)

Don’t know

10 (4.9)

3 (1.5)

Diagnostic method for (Chikungunya or Dengue infection)?

PCR

24 (11.5)

51 (24.9)

Rapid diagnostic test

32 (15.6)

47 (22.9)

ELISA

43 (21.0)

50 (24.4)

Don’t know

106 (51.7)

57 (27.8)

How do you advice patients to prevent themselves against (Chikungunya or Dengue infection)?

Wearing long clothes at afternoon

43 (21.0)

56 (27.3)

Use of repellents

94 (45.9)

139 (67.8)

Use of blankets at night

11 (5.4)

5 (2.4)

Don’t know

57 (27.8)

5 (2.4)

PCR polymerase chain reaction, ELISA Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay

One hundred and twenty-two of HCWs (59.5%) reported that there is no vaccine for dengue virus. One hundred and five (51.3%) reported that there are diagnostic tools for dengue and almost all HCWs (199/205; 97.0%) reported that the absence of diagnostic tools for dengue virus lead to difficulties in managing the infection (Table 2).

Analysis of the association between chikungunya knowledge score and Socio-demographic characteristics

The results of univariate analysis of the selected predictors and chikungunya or dengue knowledge score are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. None of the selected predictors were associated with chikungunya or dengue knowledge.

Discussion

This study aimed to assess knowledge and diagnostic practices regarding dengue and chikungunya among HCWs in Moshi Municipality. This study identified knowledge gaps among HCWs that should be targeted to improve the HCWs ability to practice and manage dengue and chikungunya infections.

For control and management of diseases a good knowledge about aetiology, mode of transmission, management and control is needed. This study found that the good knowledge regarding chikungunya was 46.3%. This level of knowledge was not satisfactory among HCWs. HCWs are expected to be knowledgeable about diseases as this knowledge could have been obtained in medical schools. Findings of this study was higher as compared with the study conducted in other District but the same Kilimanjaro region, which reported a overall knowledge to be 2.4% [20]. Slightly higher knowledge in this could be due to several reports of the disease in Tanzania [11, 13, 15, 17], and outbreak in nearby country where outbreaks of chikungunya had occurred at Lamu and Mombasa in 2004 [24]. A current study reported high dengue knowledge as compared by a study conducted by Kajeguka et al. [20]. The high knowledge of dengue among HCWs could be due to knowledge after the outbreak in the capital city Dar es Salaam in 2014 [25]. The outbreak created awareness to most of people in Tanzania. The same scenario has been reported in Singapore [26].

It is important to note that while majority of the HCWs were aware of dengue, a proportion of the respondents hold wrong notions about the cause, symptoms, transmissions and treatment of dengue. The HCWs didn’t know the treatments of the infections as most of them reported the treatments of infections as antiviral or antimalarial drugs. In a study of hospitalised febrile patients in northern Tanzania, most febrile illnesses like dengue and chikungunya were treated as malaria and some cases with antibacterial [13].

Conclusion

There is insufficient knowledge regarding chikungunya fever among HCWs in Moshi Municipality. In view of this result, government and other non-government organizations should revisit the medical school curriculum especially in areas where vector borne diseases are prevalent. Refresher training of HCWs should be conducted regularly to improve their technical skills and build their capability.

Limitation

Our results have some limitations. It is possible that some respondents might have provided desirable responses to some questions, since the study was a face to face interview. The study included a number of HCWs from Moshi Municipality, Small sample size which is limited only to HCWs from Moshi Municipality, hence finding are not nationally representative and cannot be generalized across the country.

Abbreviations

HCW: 

Health Care Workers

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SS: conceived the study, design and performed the study, participated in the field, contributed to interpretation of results and drafted the manuscript. DCK: contributed to the overall study, interpretation of data and critical review of manuscript; DDK: participated in the field and revised the manuscript; MRM and BE: contributed to overall study design, analysis of data and critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants from all health facilities in Moshi.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data on which this article is based are included within the article.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Research and Ethics Review Committee (CRERC) with a certificate number 658. A written informed consent was obtained from all participants who agreed to participate in the study. Permission to conduct this study was sought from district medical officers (DMO) and directors of health facilities.

Funding

Samwel Saringe is supported by High Educations Students’ Loan Board (HESLB) of United Republic of Tanzania. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, P.O. Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania
(2)
National Institute for Medical Research, Headquarters, P.O. Box 9653, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
(3)
Institute of Rural Development Planning, P.O. Box 138, Dodoma, Tanzania

References

  1. WHO. A global brief on vector-borne diseases. World Heal. Organ. 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/111008/1/WHO_DCO_WHD_2014.1_eng.pdf. Accessed 23 Jun 2015.
  2. Dhimal M, Gautam I, Joshi HD, Hara RB, Ahrens B, Kuch U, et al. Risk factors for the presence of chikungunya and dengue vectors (Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus), their altitudinal distribution and climatic determinants of their abundance in Central Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:1–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Reiter P. Aedes albopictus as an epidemic vector of chikungunya virus: another emerging problem? Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:463–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. WHO. Dengue and severe dengue. World Heal. Organ. 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/. Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
  5. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496:504–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nsoesie EO, Kraemer MUG, Golding N, Pigott DM, Brady OJ, Moyes CL, et al. Global distribution and environmental suitability for chikungunya virus, 1952 to 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Weaver SC. Chikungunya virus and prospects for a vaccine. Expert Rev Vacc. 2012;11:1087–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Iftikhar R, Burney WA. Physicians knowledge regarding dengue haemorrhagic fever. Isra Med J. 2012;4:4–7.Google Scholar
  9. Rafique I, Arif M, Saqib N, Siddiqui S, Munir MA, Malik IA. Dengue knowledge and its management practices among physicians of major cities of Pakistan. J Park Med Assoc. 2015;65:392–6.Google Scholar
  10. Corrin T, Waddell L, Greig J, Young I, Hierlihy C, Mascarenhas M. Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals : a systematic review. Trop Med Heal. 2017;45:1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kajeguka DC, Kaaya RD, Mwakalinga S, Ndossi R, Ndaro A, Chilongola JO, et al. Prevalence of dengue and chikungunya virus infections in north-eastern Tanzania: a cross sectional study among participants presenting with malaria-like symptoms. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinrich N, Saathoff E, Weller N, Clowes P, Kroidl I, Ntinginya E, et al. High seroprevalence of rift valley fever and evidence for endemic circulation in Mbeya Region, Tanzania, in a cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hertz JT, Munishi M, Ooi EE, Howe S, Lim WY, Chow A, et al. Chikungunya and dengue fever among hospitalized febrile patients in northern Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:171–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chipwaza B, Mugasa JP, Selemani M, Amuri M, Mosha F, Ngatunga SD, et al. Dengue and chikungunya fever among viral diseases in outpatient febrile children in Kilosa District Hospital, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:1–8.Google Scholar
  15. Weller N, Clowes P, Dobler G, Saathoff E, Kroidl I, Hoelscher M, et al. Seroprevalence of alphavirus antibodies in a cross-sectional study in Southwestern Tanzania suggests endemic circulation of chikungunya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bisimwa NP, Angwenyi S, Kinimi E, Shayo M, Bwihangane BA, Kasanga CJ. Molecular detection of arboviruses in Aedes mosquitoes collected from Kyela district. Tanzania. Rev Med Vet. 2016;167:138–44.Google Scholar
  17. Crump A, Morrissey A, Nicholson W, Massung R, Stoddard R, Galloway RL, et al. Etiology of severe non-malaria febrile illness in Northern Tanzania: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013;7:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mboera LEG, Mweya CN, Rumisha SF, Tungu PK, Stanley G, Makange MR, Risk The, et al. the risk of dengue virus transmission in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania during an epidemic period of 2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;2016:10.Google Scholar
  19. Chipwaza B, Mugasa JP, Mayumana I, Amuri M, Makungu C, Gwakisa PS. Community Knowledge and Attitudes and Health Workers’ Practices regarding Non-malaria Febrile Illnesses in Eastern Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kajeguka DC, Desrochers RE, Mwangi R, Mgabo MR, Alifrangis M, Kavishe RA, et al. Knowledge and practice regarding dengue and chikungunya: a cross-sectional study among Healthcare workers and community in Northern Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22:583–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Handel AS, Ayala EB, Borbor-Cordova MJ, Fessler AG, Finkelstein JL, Espinoza RXR, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dengue infection among public sector healthcare providers in Machala, Ecuador. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2016;2:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Itrat A, Khan A, Javaid S, Kamal M, Khan H, Javed S, et al. Knowledge, awareness and practices regarding dengue fever among the adult population of dengue hit cosmopolitan. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2620.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Al-zurfi BMN, Fuad MDF, Abdelqader MA, Baobaid MF, Ghazi HF, Ibrahim MH, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of dengue fever and heath education programme among students of Alam Shah Science. Malaysian J. Public Heal. Med. 2015;15:69–74.Google Scholar
  24. Schuffenecker I, Iteman I, Michault A, Murri S, Frangeul L, Vaney MC, et al. Genome microevolution of chikungunya viruses causing the Indian Ocean outbreak. PLoS Med. 2006;3:1058–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. WHO. Dengue outbreak in the United Republic of Tanzania (Situation as of 30 May 2014). WHO Libr. 2014. http://www.afro.who.int/en/clusters-a-programmes/dpc/epidemic-a-pandemic-alert-and-response/4155-dengue-outbreak-in-the-united-republic-of-tanzania-30-may-2014.html. Accessed 30 Jul 2015.
  26. Pang J, Hildon ZL, Thein TL, Jin J, Leo YS. Assessing changes in knowledge, attitude and practices on dengue diagnosis and management among primary care physicians after the largest dengue epidemic in Singapore. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:428. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2525-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement