Skip to main content

Structure of a VHH isolated from a naïve phage display library



To determine the X-ray structure and biophysical properties of a Camelid VHH isolated from a naïve phage display library.


Single domain antibodies (VHH) derived from the unique immune system of the Camelidae family have gained traction as useful tools for biotechnology as well as a source of potentially novel therapeutics. Here we report the structure and biophysical characterization of a VHH originally isolated from a naïve camelid phage display library. VHH R419 has a melting temperate of 66 °C and was found to be a monomer in solution. The protein crystallized in space group P6522 and the structure was solved by molecular replacement to a resolution of 1.5 Å. The structure revealed a flat paratope with CDR loops that could be classified into existing canonical loop structures. A combination of high expression yield, stability and rapid crystallization might make R419 into a candidate scaffold for CDR grafting and homology modeling.


The immune system of the Camelidae family (camels, llamas and alpacas) are unusual as in addition to possessing prototypic antibodies; their sera contain a species of antibody that has lost the light chain [1]. The variable domain of these Camelidae antibodies can be cloned, resulting in the smallest known functional antigen-binding unit—the VHH (also called nanobodies, single domain antibodies, or sdAb). VHH antibody fragments are small (13–15 kDa), heat stable, readily produced in E. coli and display distinct antigen-binding properties compared to traditional antibody fragments [2]. The isolation of antigen specific VHH is carried out using phage display from Camelidae immunization, naïve immune repertoires, or synthetic/semi-synthetic libraries [3].

The genes coding for the Camelidae heavy chain antibodies diverged from other ungulates 25 million years ago and have evolved sequence and structural differences which make them distinct from conventional hetero-dimeric antibodies [4]. Of particular note are the significant differences in the antigen binding complementarity determining region (CDR) loops CDR loops. VHH have been found to have unusually long CDR1 and CDR3 loops [5] and CDR1 and CDR2 canonical frequently depart from the canonical structures found in traditional antibodies [6].

The differences in VHH biophysical properties compared to traditional antibody formats have generated considerable interest in employing VHH for therapeutics, diagnostics and even for the detection of environmental pollutants [7,8,9]. Given the potential biotechnological and biomedical importance of VHH, the ability to construct highly accurate homology models is extremely useful. However, the differences in CDR structure can make structural homology modeling of VHH challenging [10]. The more VHH structures available will increase the success of modeling algorithms, and our understanding of the structural diversity present in VHH.

The VHH R419 was originally isolated from a pre-immune phage display library to bind the Listeria surface antigen Internalin B [11]. VHH R419 was later found to be non-functional as it was unable to bind InlB or inhibit Listeria invasion in vitro [12]. Here we report the structure and biophysical characterization of VHH R419 for its potential future value in homology modeling of other more therapeutically relevant VHH. The high yield, stability and ease of crystallization of R419 may make it into a valuable scaffold for CDR grafting.

Main text


Protein purification

The gene for VHH R419 [11] was codon optimized for E. coli expression and produced as a double stranded GenPart DNA fragment (Genscript Inc, NJ). The DNA fragment was cloned into the periplasmic expression vector pET-22b (EMD Millipore, USA). The plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). An overnight culture was used to inoculate 2 × YT media. The culture was grown to mid-log phase (30 °C, 225 rev min−1, OD600 = 0.7) and induced with IPTG (0.4 mM). Fermentation was carried out overnight (16 h, 30 °C, 225 rev min−1). VHH R419 was extracted from the periplasm using an osmic shock procedure. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000g, 4 °C, 10 min) and suspended in ice cold TES buffer (0.2 M Tris pH 8.0, 0.5 M sucrose, 0.5 mM EDTA). The cells were mixed on ice for 30 min and an equal volume of ice-cold water was added and mixed on ice for an additional 30 min. The periplasmic fraction containing the VHH was harvested from the cell pellet (12,000g, 4 °C, 30 min) and dialyzed for an hour against 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.15 M NaCl. The protein was purified using IMAC (immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography) by batch binding the dialyzed periplasmic fraction to 1 ml of His-Pur Ni-NTA rein (Thermo Scientific, USA) for 1 h at 4 °C. Unbound protein was removed by washing with 30 column volumes of wash buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.3 M NaCl, 10 mM imidazole). The protein was eluted using a step gradient consisting of 0.25, 0.5 and 1 M imidazole. Protein purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1

Purification and characterization of VHH R419. a SDS-PAGE of VHH R419 purification using immobilized metal affinity chromatography. The three lanes (i–iii) correspond to imidazole concentrations of the elutions (0.25 M, 0.5 M and 1 M). b Analytical size exclusion chromatography of VHH R419 (dashed line) and VHH R326 (solid line). Despite having the same molecular weight (14.7 kDa), the proteins display different elution volumes. c Thermal stability (Tm = 66 °C) of R419 measured by CD spectroscopy. d Reversible refolding of R419 measured by CD spectroscopy. Samples were cooled back to 25 ºC immediately following thermal denaturation. e Aggregation propensity of R419 during refolding was measured by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Unheated R419 was injected onto a analytical SEC column. R419 was heated, cooled to allow refolding, centrifuged to remove aggregates and injected onto a SEC column. The difference of the areas under the curves represents the amount of sample unfolded and lost due to aggregation

Analytical size exclusion chromatography

A size exclusion column (Enrich SEC70, BioRad) was equilibrated 2 CV of buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl (pH = 8), 0.15 M NaCl). R419 (0.2 ml, 1 mg ml−1) was injected onto the pre-equilibrated size exclusion column (flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1) protein elution was monitored at 280 nm (Fig. 1b). For molecular weight estimation, gel filtration standards ranging from 1.3 to 670 kDa (BioRad Inc.) were injected onto the size exclusion column. A standard curve was constructed and the molecular weight of R419 estimated from the curve.

Circular dichroism spectroscopy

R419 was diluted to 7.5 μM in PBS buffer and filtered through 0.45 μm microfilter. Using a JASCO J-815 CD spectrometer, a variable temperature measurement program was run at a wavelength of 200 nm from 25 to 95 °C. Reversible folding was monitored in the same sample by reversing the denaturation curve from 95 to 25 °C. The experiment was repeated three times, and the data exported to GraphPad Prism for final analysis.

Aggregation assay

The propensity of R419 to aggregate was measured by size exclusion chromatography. Samples of R419 (45 μg) were heated (80 °C, 10 min) and then cooled (4 °C, 10 min). Samples were then centrifuged (17,000×g, 10 min) and analyzed on an analytical size exclusion column (Enrich SEC70, BioRad). The amount of protein aggregation was expressed as the percent recovery of the area under the curve after heating relative to the unheated sample.


VHH R419 was dialyzed against 10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 30 mM NaCl and concentrated to 10 mg ml−1. Crystal screening was carried out in 96-well Intelli-plates (Hampton Research, USA) using the PEGs and PEG II crystal screens (Qiagen, USA). Diamond shaped crystals were observed in multiple conditions in both screens. Crystal conditions used for X-ray diffraction were 0.2 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 30% PEG 5000 monomethyl ether.

X-ray data collection and processing

Crystals of R419 were soaked in cryoprotectant (mother liquor containing 25% glycerol) and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. X-ray data was collected on beamline 08ID-1 at the Canadian Light Source equipped with a Rayonix MX300 CCD X-ray detector [13]. The data were processed with xia2 [14] (Table 1).

Table 1 X-ray data collection, processing and refinement

Structure solution and refinement

The structure of R419 was solved by molecular replacement using Phaser [15] as implemented in Phenix [16]. The VHH R303 (PDB code: 6DBA) was used as a search model [12]. Model building was carried out using Coot [17]. Final model statistics are provided in Table 1.

Results and discussion

The VHH R419 expressed to a high yield in E. coli (~ 5 mg l−1 of culture) and was purified to homogeneity using a single step nickel affinity chromatography step from the E. coli periplasm (Fig. 1a). Biophysical characterization of purified VHH R419 was carried out using a combination of analytical size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and circular dichroism spectroscopy. The protein eluted from the SEC column as a single, monodisperse peak with a retention volume of 14.4 ml (Fig. 1b). To determine the quaternary structure of R419 from the SEC data, the molecular weight was calculated from a standard curve. Surprisingly, the molecular weight determined by SEC was determined to be only 5 kDa, which is ~ 3 times smaller that the molecular weight calculated form the sequence (14.7 kDa). A VHH of similar size to R419 (R326, 14.7 kDa), did not display this behavior (Fig. 1b, retention volume, 12 ml, calculated molecular weight 12 kDa). The rapid migration of R419 through the SEC column may be indicative of a compact structure and a monomeric configuration.

The stability, reversible folding and aggregations propensity of R419 was determined by a combination of circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, and by SEC. The thermal stability of R419 was measured by monitoring the thermal induced denaturation of the antibody (Fig. 1c). The melting temperature (Tm) was calculated to be 66 °C from the denaturation curve. This places the stability of R419 well within the typical Tm range of 50–80 °C found in VHHs [18]. One of the hallmark biophysical properties observed in some camelid VHH is reversible refolding following heating [19]. The aggregation and refolding properties of R419 were examined using several approaches. First, CD spectroscopy was used to follow the refolding of R419. Immediately following heat denaturing (Fig. 1c), the temperature gradient was reversed and the sample was cooled to allow for refolding (Fig. 1d). Nearly the entire sample was refolded, with 85–90% of the original CD signal being restored upon cooling (Fig. 1d). For another quantitative assessment of in solution refolding, R419 was heated and the recovery of the sample after cooling was calculated after injection onto a SEC column which readily separates aggregates [20]. A percent recovery of 82% (± 2%) was calculated from four experiments (Fig. 1e). These results suggest that R419 displays superior biophysical properties in terms of reversible folding and aggregation resistance. Aggregation resistance and reversible folding in camelid VHH domains was believed to be a hallmark of the domain that distinguished them from the homologous VH3 domains found in human antibodies [19]. However, a recent survey of 70 camel and llama VHH found that aggregation resistance and reversible folding were very rare, with only 1–5% of antibodies reversibly folding [21]. Interestingly, R419 contains none of the factors correlated with the propensity of VHH to reversibly fold, such as an usually long CDR3 loop (see below), or the presence of a non-canonical disulfide bond [21].

R419 was an easily crystallized VHH. Well-formed, diamond shaped crystals appearing directly in robotic screens in several conditions within a few days (Fig. 2a). Similar appearing crystals grew in a total of 10 conditions. These conditions contained PEG 4000 or PEG 5000 MME, with Tris, HEPES and MES buffer (pH 6.5–8.5). Crystals from the robot screen diffracted to a resolution of 1.5 Å, and the structure was readily solved by molecular replacement (Table 1). The structure contained a single molecule in the asymmetric unit, with no major disordered regions (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

Crystallization and structure D of VHH R419. a Crystals of R419 grown in PEG MME and MES buffer. b Ribbon structure of R419. CDR loops are colored, CDR 1—violet, CDR 2—light pink, CDR 3—cyan. c Paratope structure of VHH R419. The paratope of R419 is flat and has a radius of 23 Å

In contrast to the flat or convex paratope shape associated with traditional antibodies, the paratope region of VHH are typically classified as being either flat or convex [6]. The paratope of R419 is flat in shape, with a radius of 23 Å, which falls within the normal distribution of VHH paratope radii of 15–25 Å [6] (Fig. 2c).

The CDR loops of R419 were classified using the standard canonical clusters as described by North [22]. CDR 1 is 13 amino acids long and falls within the 4th cluster (Fig. 2b). While 13 amino acids is the most common loop length for CDR H1 in human, mice, as well as camelid species, cluster 4 is only found in 2.6% of alpaca CDR1 loops, 0.8% of Llama CDR1 loops [6, 22]. The CDR2 loop of R419 is 10 amino acids long, and falls within cluster 2, which is the most common canonical structure observed in camelid VHH (Fig. 2c). CDR3 is 11 amino acids long, which is within the range falls within the median loop range of 7–16 residues found within 86% of antibody structures [22].

In many ways VHH R419, is an “average” VHH, with biophysical and structural properties typical of many camelid VHH structures. The structure presented here may be useful for homology modeling of similar VHH or given the protein’s high expression yield, mid-range thermal stability, reversible folding lacking in significant aggregation and ease of crystallization, R419 may be a valuable tool for CDR scaffolding or as the basis of a novel semi-synthetic phage display library for VHH discovery.


  • VHH R419 has no direct therapeutic or diagnostic value as it does not appear to bind the InlB antigen.

  • We have yet to demonstrate that VHH R419 is a valuable tool for CDR grafting.



variable region from camelid single domain heavy chain antibody


complementarity determining region


size exclusion chromatography


circular dichroism


  1. 1.

    Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hamers C, Songa EB, Bendahman N, Hamers R. Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature. 1993;363(6428):446–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Muyldermans S. Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82:775–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu W, Song H, Chen Q, Yu J, Xian M, Nian R, Feng D. Recent advances in the selection and identification of antigen-specific nanobodies. Mol Immunol. 2018;96:37–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Flajnik MF, Deschacht N, Muyldermans S. A case of convergence: why did a simple alternative to canonical antibodies arise in sharks and camels? PLoS Biol. 2011;9(8):e1001120.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Muyldermans S, Baral TN, Retamozzo VC, De Baetselier P, De Genst E, Kinne J, Leonhardt H, Magez S, Nguyen VK, Revets H, et al. Camelid immunoglobulins and nanobody technology. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2009;128(1–3):178–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Henry KA, MacKenzie CR. Antigen recognition by single-domain antibodies: structural latitudes and constraints. mAbs. 2018;10(6):815–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bever CS, Dong JX, Vasylieva N, Barnych B, Cui Y, Xu ZL, Hammock BD, Gee SJ. VHH antibodies: emerging reagents for the analysis of environmental chemicals. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(22):5985–6002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gonzalez-Sapienza G, Rossotti MA, Tabares-da Rosa S. Single-domain antibodies as versatile affinity reagents for analytical and diagnostic applications. Front Immunol. 2017;8:977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hu Y, Liu C, Muyldermans S. Nanobody-based delivery systems for diagnosis and targeted tumor therapy. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sircar A, Sanni KA, Shi J, Gray JJ. Analysis and modeling of the variable region of camelid single-domain antibodies. J Immunol. 2011;186(11):6357–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gene RW, Kumaran J, Aroche C, van Faassen H, Hall JC, MacKenzie CR, Arbabi-Ghahroudi M. High affinity anti-Internalin B VHH antibody fragments isolated from naturally and artificially immunized repertoires. J Immunol Methods. 2015;416:29–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    King MT, Huh I, Shenai A, Brooks TM, Brooks CL. Structural basis of VHH-mediated neutralization of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(35):13626–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Grochulski P, Fodje M, Labiuk S, Gorin J, Janzen K, Berg R. Canadian macromolecular crystallography facility: a suite of fully automated beamlines. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2012;13(2):49–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Winter G, Lobley CM, Prince SM. Decision making in xia2. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013;69(Pt 7):1260–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr. 2007;40(Pt 4):658–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 2):213–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 4):486–501.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Goldman ER, Liu JL, Zabetakis D, Anderson GP. Enhancing stability of camelid and shark single domain antibodies: an overview. Front Immunol. 2017;8:865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ewert S, Cambillau C, Conrath K, Pluckthun A. Biophysical properties of camelid V(HH) domains compared to those of human V(H)3 domains. Biochemistry. 2002;41(11):3628–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dudgeon K, Rouet R, Christ D. Rapid prediction of expression and refolding yields using phage display. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2013;26(10):671–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kunz P, Zinner K, Mucke N, Bartoschik T, Muyldermans S, Hoheisel JD. The structural basis of nanobody unfolding reversibility and thermoresistance. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    North B, Lehmann A, Dunbrack RL Jr. A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. J Mol Biol. 2011;406(2):228–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

BW and IH designed and carried out the experiments. CLB wrote the manuscript and provided funding for the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We thank Dr. Roger Mackenzie, Robert Gene and Dr. Jyothi Kumaran (National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada) for supplying the R419 sequence. We thank Shaun Labiuk at the Canadian Light Source for technical assistance with X-ray data collection.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The coordinates for the X-ray structures of R419 has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB accession code:6DYX). All other data generation or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.


Research reported in manuscript was supported (100%) by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS) under Award Number SC3GM112532. Funding by NIGMS was used to support all aspects of the study funding including the design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and in writing the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cory L. Brooks.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, B., Huh, I. & Brooks, C.L. Structure of a VHH isolated from a naïve phage display library. BMC Res Notes 12, 154 (2019).

Download citation


  • Nanobody
  • VHH
  • Single domain antibody