Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Attitude of Nursing and Midwifery students towards clinical practice and its associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 3
BMC Research Notes201912:205

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4230-3

  • Received: 6 January 2019
  • Accepted: 26 March 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the attitude of Nursing and Midwifery students towards clinical practice and its associated factors at University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. 2018.

Result

The prevalence of a favorable attitude towards clinical practice was found to be 42.9% in this study. The odds of having favorable attitude were found to be 2 times higher among students who prepared well for clinical practice [AOR = 2.07, 95%, CI (1.25, 3.44)] compared with counterparts. Similarly students who communicate well with clinical staffs [AOR = 1.89, 95%, CI (1.05, 3.41)], practiced in well-equipped hospital [AOR = 1.76, 95%, CI (1.01, 3.06)], and accompanying frequently by a clinical supervisor [AOR = 1.69, 95%, CI (1.02, 2.81)] were more likely to have favorable attitude compared with counterparts.

Keywords

  • Nursing and Midwifery students
  • Attitude
  • Clinical practice

Introduction

The meaningful correlation between theory and practical education is taking place in a clinical setting [15]. One of the bases for quality nursing service is nursing education which encompasses the three domains of learning; knowledge, attitude, and practice [6, 7].

Attitude plays a major role in leading human toward achieving the desired goals, awareness of its consequences, and effective processing of complex information [5, 6, 8]. Students’ attitude towards clinical practice could be affected by a clinical environment, student staff interaction, clinical preceptors, and the availability of necessary equipment in a hospital setting [9, 10].

Lack of interest in what people do could decrease the quality of work [5, 6, 11]. More than half of all healthcare providers are Midwives and Nurse in the healthcare setting [5, 6]. Hence, if the attitude of Nursing and Midwifery professionals is not favorable, the quality of health care could be compromised in a significant manner. In Ethiopia, students join Nursing and Midwifery degree programs directly after completing secondary education which demands intensive clinical training to acquire Nursing and Midwifery competencies [12].

There is a significant incoherence between theory and clinical practice [9] and one of the cause of this discrepancy could be attitude. A positive attitude towards clinical practice enhances effective clinical learning. Whereas, a negative attitude hampers the acquisition of essential clinical skills. Thus, identifying the gap in clinical practice is noteworthy for improving the quality of Nursing and Midwifery educations [13].

Main text

Methods

Study design and population

An institution based cross-sectional study was employed from March 19 to 26, 2018 on 345 Nursing and Midwifery students at University of Gondar. The University of Gondar (UoG), until 2003 known as Gondar College of Medical Sciences. It is the oldest medical school in Ethiopia which was established as the Public Health College in 1954. It is also the pioneer institution to initiate degree Midwifery training program in Ethiopia [12, 14]. The study population was randomly selected regular Nursing and Midwifery students who fulfill the inclusion criteria.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Randomly selected second-year and above regular Nursing and Midwifery students and those who were willing to participate in the study were included. Whereas, all first-year regular Nursing and Midwifery students, and those refused to participate in the study were excluded.

Sample size determination

A single population proportion formula was used to calculate sample size at Zα/2 = 1.96, 95% confidence interval, d = 0.05 degree of margin of error, and proportion (P = 0.5 since there was no similar study as far as the authors’ knowledge). Thus, the final sample size after adding 10% non-response rate was 345 by using a correction formula (Fig. 1).

Measurement of variables and definitions

The attitude towards clinical practice was measured based on the mean of the sum of fifteen attitude questions which was 9.41 points with minimum and maximum scores of 2 and 15 points, respectively. The attitude score was dichotomized as favorable and unfavorable. Attitude scores ≤ 9.41 was taken as “unfavorable attitude” while > 9.41 was taken as “favorable attitude.”

Well-equipped hospital: Is a hospital which provides all services to be provided at a hospital level using the current available laboratory setting. Adequacy of rooms were also considered in this study.

Accompanied frequently: In this study accompanied frequently by a clinical supervisor is considered if the clinical supervisor is available with students at least 3 days a week.

Communicate well: Students who interact with staffs in every procedure were considered as communicate well with staffs in this study.

Data collection process and quality assurance

The calculated sample was allocated to the selected Departments based on the number of students per years of study. Then study participants were selected by a simple random sampling technique from each year of study using students’ registration. Data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire prepared in English after orienting the selected participants. The questionnaire was adapted from previously published literature [1, 3, 7, 15, 16]. Content validity of each questionnaire was evaluated based on the review of nine experts in the field of Nursing and Midwifery. Experts’ ratings were used to calculate the content validity index (CVI) values of each item. Each item with validity index > 0.78 was included in the final instrument.

Data analysis and processing

Data was entered by EpiData version 3.1 and analyzed by SPSS version 20. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify the significance, strength, and direction of the association at 95% confidence interval. An adjusted odds ratio were used to identify the independent predictors of attitude. All factors with a P value of < 0.2 in the bivariable analysis were entered in the multivariable model to identify the independent predictors of attitude towards clinical practice. P value of < 0.05 was used to decide the significance of association at 95% confidence interval.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval and letter of permission were obtained from the College of Health Science, AAU. The letter of permission was submitted to the Nursing and Midwifery Departments, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UoG to get permission. Following the permission, participants were briefed about the study purpose and the procedure of the data collection process. The privacy of the study participants’ and confidentiality of information was maintained.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

A total of 345 students from the two Departments were participated in the study. Five questionnaire were excluded from the analysis due to gross incompleteness of responses, giving a response rate of 98.6%. Nearly three forth of the study participants were found in age group of 20–24 years (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of Nursing and Midwifery students at UoG, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018

Characteristics

Frequency

Percent (%)

Sex (N = 340)

 Male

170

50.0

 Female

170

50.0

Age in years (N = 340)

 15–19

73

21.5

 20–24

246

72.3

 25–29

19

5.6

 ≥ 30

2

0.6

Assigned in clinical practice in your stay (N = 340)

 One

81

23.8

 Two

93

27.4

 Three

63

18.5

 Four and above

103

30.3

Year of study (N = 340)

 2nd year

125

36.8

 3rd year

125

36.8

 4th year

90

26.4

Field of study (N = 340)

 Nursing

155

45.6

 Midwifery

185

54.4

Do you use substance? (N = 340)

 Yes

20

5.9

 No

320

94.1

Type of substance (N = 20)

 Chat

6

1.8

 Alcohol

12

3.5

 Cigarette

2

0.6

Frequency/week N = 20

 Daily

2

1.8

 2–4 day/week

11

3.5

 Once a week

7

0.6

Factors affecting students’ attitude towards clinical practice

Table 2 below revealed the multivariable analysis of factors affecting the attitude of students towards clinical practice among students in UoG. The odds of having favorable attitude were found to be 2 times higher among students who prepared well for clinical practice [AOR = 2.07, 95%, CI (1.25, 3.44)] compared with counterparts.
Table 2

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of attitude towards clinical practice, in UoG, 2018

Variable

Attitude to clinical practice

COR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

Favorable

Unfavorable

Time of assigned in clinical practice

 One

29 (19.9%)

52 (26.8%)

1

1

 Two

35 (24%)

58 (29.9%)

1.08 (0.58, 2.01)

1.91 (0.84, 4.33)

 Three

28 (19.1%)

35 (18.0%)

1.43 (0.73, 2.81)

2.93 (0.91, 9.48)

 Four and above

54 (37%)

49 (25.3%)

1.98 (1.09, 3.59)*

2.08 (0.54, 7.98)

Year of study

 2nd

50 (34.2%)

75 (38.7%)

1

1

 3rd

41 (28.1%)

84 (43.3%)

0.73 (0.44, 1.23)

0.45 (0.18, 1.12)

 4th

55 (37.7%)

35 (18.0%)

2.36 (1.35, 4.11)*

1.21 (0.33, 4.45)

Prepared for clinical practice

 Yes

69 (47.3%)

68 (35.1%)

1.66 (1.07, 2.58)*

2.07 (1.25, 3.44)**

 No

77 (52.7%)

126 (64.9%)

1

1

Communicate well with staff

 Yes

119 (81.5%)

139 (71.6%)

1.74 (1.04, 2.94)*

1.89 (1.05, 3.41)**

 No

27 (18.5%)

55 (28.4%)

1

1

Ready to interact with staffs

 Yes

132 (90.4%)

151 (77.8%)

2.69 (1.41, 5.13)*

2.02 (0.97, 4.21)

 No

14 (9.6%)

43 (22.2)

1

1

Staff show respect to students

 Yes

103 (70.5%)

118 (60.8%)

1.54 (0.98, 2.44)

0.82 (0.47, 1.45)

 No

43 (29.5%)

76 (39.2%)

1

1

Favorable hospital

 Yes

100 (68.5%)

96 (49.5%)

2.22 (1.42,3.48)*

1.76 (1.01, 3.06)**

 No

46 (31.5%)

98 (50.5%)

1

1

Sufficient material in clinical area

 Yes

93 (63.7%)

95 (49.0%)

1.83 (1.18, 2.84)*

1.17 (0.69, 1.99)

 No

53 (36.3%)

99 (51.0%)

1

1

Attended by supervisor frequently

 Yes

82 (56.2%)

76 (39.2%)

1.99 (1.29,3.08)*

1.69 (1.02,2.81)**

 No

64 (43.8%)

118 (60.8%)

1

1

The instructor facilitates staff relationship

 Yes

125 (85.6%)

134 (69.1%)

2.67 (1.53, 4.64)*

1.63 (0.85, 3.11)

 No

21 (14.4%)

60 (30.9%)

1

1

The instructor provides me constructive feedback

 Yes

101 (69.2%)

110 (56.7%)

1.71 (1.09, 2.69)*

1.25 (0.73, 2.12)

 No

45 (30.8%)

84 (43.3%)

1

1

My pleasure is to meet patient needs

 Yes

142 (97.3%)

193 (99.5%)

0.18 (0.02, 1.66)

0.22 (0.02, 2.64)

 No

4 (2.7%)

1 (0.5%)

1

1

Maintain patient dignity

 Yes

129 (88.4%)

183 (94.3%)

0.46 (0.21, 1.01)

0.51 (0.21, 1.28)

 No

17 (11.6%)

11 (5.7%)

1

1

NB: * Significate in the binary analysis; ** Significant in the multivariable analysis

CI confidence interval, COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Sampling procedure for selection of the study participants

Discussion

The prevalence of favorable attitude towards clinical practice was 42.9% in this study which indicates more than half, (57.1%) of the study participants had an unfavorable attitude. Unfavorable attitude can lead to poor intent to attend theory and practical sessions [6, 17]. Consistent with a previous study [1], seniority was found to be associated with having a favorable attitude towards clinical practice in our study, 55 (37.7%) and 50 (34.2%) among 4th and 2nd-year students, respectively. Similar with previous studies [1820], the majority of students (97.9%) agreed that clinical practice is the major area of Nursing and Midwifery profession in this study. The multivariable analysis revealed that the odds of having a favorable attitude towards clinical practice were found to be 2 times higher among students who prepared well compared with counterparts [AOR = 2.07, 95%, CI (1.247, 3.439)]. Appropriate preparation before clinical attachment increases students’ desire to learn in a clinical setting. The finding is consistent with a study done in Norway [21].

With regards to interaction with staffs, the odds of having a positive attitude towards clinical practice were found to be 2 times higher among students who had good communication with clinical staffs [AOR = 1.89, 95%, CI (1.05, 3.41)] compared counterparts. The finding of our study is consistent with previous studies conducted in Jamaica [22], Spain [2], and Iran [3]. This might be due to the fact that clinical staffs are the key stakeholders to shape students with necessary skills, creating conducive clinical-environment, and socializing students with their profession [23]. Similarly, students who practiced in a well-equipped hospital were more likely to have a favorable attitude towards clinical practice compared with counterparts [AOR = 1.76, 95%, CI (1.01, 3.06)]. This might be due to the fact that students could have a better picture of the clinical setup which derives the learning objectives. The finding is supported by the studies done in Australia [8], and Afghanistan [15].

The multivariable analysis indicated that the odds of having favorable attitude were found to be 1.7 times higher among students who were frequently accompanied by clinical-mentors compared with counterparts [AOR = 1.69, 95%, CI (1.018, 2.805)]. This might be due to the fact that clinical mentor can smoothen the relationship between clinical staff and students by bridging gaps. The finding is consistent with the studies done in Norway [21], Iran [24], and Rwanda [23].

Conclusion

Students who had good communications with clinical staffs, prepared well for clinical practice, practiced in well-equipped hospital, and accompanied frequently by clinical-supervisors in a clinical setting had a favorable attitude towards clinical practice.

Limitation

The study design is cross-sectional which might be difficult to make cause and effect relationship. Using only a quantitative method might not explicate the real attitude of students related to clinical practice. We have tried to collect data based on the immediate clinical experience of students’ which can be taken as a strength.

Abbreviations

AAU: 

Addis Ababa University

CI: 

confidence interval

UoG: 

University of Gondar

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YA, WS, WD, and MM have contributed to the design, data collection, thesis write-up, manuscript development, and edition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are delighted to acknowledge the College of Health Sciences of AAU for securing the ethical review process and for covering the data collection fee. Moreover, the authors would like to express appreciation to study participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the College of Health Sciences, AAU. A written official letter was submitted to the selected departments. Moreover, the purpose of the study was revealed and written consent was obtained from each study participant prior to the initiation of the data collection process. Autonomy of the study participants and the confidentiality of information were maintained.

Funding

This study has been funded by the College of Health Science of AAU. The funding body has no role in the design, data collection, analysis, and write-up apart from covering the data collection expense.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Midwifery, Debre Tabor Health Science College, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
(2)
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
(3)
Department of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

References

  1. Fikre R. Assessment of factors affecting clinical practice competency of undergraduate health science Students in Hawassa University, South. Ethiopia. Ann Clin Lab Res. 2016;4(2):69–77.Google Scholar
  2. Lapeña-Moñux YR, Cibanal-Juan L, Orts-Cortés M, Maciá-Soler M, Palacios-Ceña D. Nurses’ experiences working with nursing students in a hospital: a phenomenological enquiry. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2016;24:e2788. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1242.2788.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jamshidi N, Molazem Z, Sharif F, Torabizadeh C, Najafi Kalyani M. The challenges of nursing students in the clinical learning environment: a qualitative study. Sci World J. 2016;2016:1846178. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1846178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Karimi S, Haghani F, Yamani N, Najafi Kalyani M. A qualitative inquiry into nursing students’ experience of facilitating reflection in clinical setting. Sci World J. 2017;2017:6293878. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6293878.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ha E-H. Attitudes toward clinical practice in undergraduate nursing students: AQ methodology study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):733–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Koushali AN, Hajiamini Z, Ebadi A. Comparison of nursing students’ and clinical nurses’ attitude toward the nursing profession. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(5):375.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Henderson A, Briggs J, Schoonbeek S, Paterson K. A framework to develop a clinical learning culture in health facilities: ideas from the literature. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(2):196–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Peters K, McInnes S, Halcomb E. Nursing students’ experiences of clinical placement in community settings: a qualitative study. Collegian. 2015;22(2):175–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tagney J, Haines C. Using evidence-based practice to address gaps in nursing knowledge. Br J Nurs. 2009;18(8):484–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rikhotso SR, Williams MJ, De Wet G. Student nurses’ perceptions of guidance and support in rural hospitals. Curationis. 2014;37(1):1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Morrison R. Nursing students’ attitudes toward people with mental illness: Do they change after instruction and clinical exposure? 2011.Google Scholar
  12. UNFPA. Investing In midwives stories from Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Federal ministry of Health and UNFPA; 2014.Google Scholar
  13. World Health Organization. Global strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery 2016–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Background history of University of Gondar. 2019. http://www.uog.edu.et/ Accessed Jan 25 2019.
  15. Elçigil A, Sarı HY. Facilitating factors in clinical education in nursing. DEUHYO ED. 2011;4(2):67–71.Google Scholar
  16. Awuah-Peasah D, Sarfo LA, Asamoah F. The attitudes of student nurses toward clinical work. Int J Nurs Midwifery. 2013;5(2):22–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tayebi Z, Dehghan-Nayeri N, Negarandeh R, Shahbazi S. Motives for entering nursing in Iran: a qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(1):59.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaur L. Assess the attitude of nursing students towards nursing profession. IJAR. 2016;2(6):738–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gebrezgabher ZT, Abera GB. Assessment of Nurses Knowledge and attitude towards nursing profession at public hospitals in Mekelle Town, Tigray, Ethiopia. Glob J Med Res. 2017;17:(1-k).Google Scholar
  20. Oyedele EA, Emmanuel A, Gaji LD, Goshit JD, Louis OI. Perception of Undergraduate nursing students about nursing profession: a study of University of Jos. Nigeria. Int J Nurs Health Sci. 2015;2(5):60–3.Google Scholar
  21. Dale B, Leland A, Dale JG. What factors facilitate good learning experiences in clinical studies in nursing: Bachelor students’ perceptions. ISRN Nurs. 2013;2013:628679. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/628679.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawal J, Weaver S, Bryan V, Lindo JL. Factors that influence the clinical learning experience of nursing students at a Caribbean school of nursing. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2015;6(4):32.Google Scholar
  23. Rajeswaran L. Clinical experiences of nursing students at a selected institute of Health Sciences in Botswana. Health Sci J. 2016;2016:1846178. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1846178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharif F, Masoumi S. A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical practice. BMC Nurs. 2005;4(1):471–476.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement