Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Tracking of objective physical activity and physical fitness in Japanese children

BMC Research Notes201912:252

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4288-y

  • Received: 12 February 2019
  • Accepted: 30 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the tracking of objective physical activity and physical fitness from childhood to adolescence in Japanese children. The longitudinal study comprised 368 participants (aged 9–10 years) in 2008, and the study involved 134 participants (aged 13–14 years, a dropout rate of 63.6%) in 2011. After excluding participants with missing data, a total of 111 participants (46 boys and 65 girls) were available for study. Step counts and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured using a uniaxial accelerometer. Physical fitness was assessed using the following tests: hand grip, sit-ups, sit and reach, side-to-side steps, 20-m shuttle run, 50-m dash, standing broad jump and ball throwing.

Results

In boys, there was a significant correlation between objective physical activity and all physical fitness tests at baseline and follow-up. In girls, although there was no significant correlation between objective physical activity at baseline and follow-up, all physical fitness tests at baseline and follow-up were significantly correlated. In conclusion, moderate tracking was shown in objective physical activity of boys from childhood to adolescence. In addition, moderate to high tracking was shown in physical fitness of both sexes from childhood to adolescence.

Keywords

  • Longitudinal
  • Youth
  • Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
  • Fitness
  • Asian children

Introduction

Several studies have reported that physical activity in childhood is correlated to both physical and mental aspects [1, 2]. Therefore, the World Health Organization recommends that children aged 5–17 years age should accumulate at least 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) every day [3]. Similarly, the physical activity guidelines in the UK [4], USA [5] and Canada [6] also recommend this level of activity for similar age groups.

A review by Telema et al. [7] reported that physical activity tracks from childhood to adolescence and indicated that most previous studies used questionnaires to measure and assess physical activity. A questionnaire can easily evaluate physical activity and has the merit of low cost. However, previous studies [8] also reported that questionnaires overestimate physical activity compared to accelerometry. In addition, Chinapaw et al. [9] reported that the reliability of physical activity questionnaires for children (mean age 6–12 years) is lower than that for adolescents (mean age 12–18 years). Therefore, it appears to be important to examine the tracking of physical activity using objective methods such as an accelerometer.

Physical fitness as well as physical activity is reportedly related to physical and mental aspects [10]. Malina [11] examined the tracking of physical fitness (e.g. strength, flexibility and endurance) and reported that physical fitness tracks from childhood to adolescence at low to moderate levels. To the best of our knowledge, the tracking of objective physical activity and physical fitness from childhood to adolescence has neither been measured nor reported in Japanese children. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm the tracking of physical activity and physical fitness from childhood to adolescence to promote the importance of physical activity and physical fitness in this population.

The purpose of this study was to examine the tracking of objective physical activity and physical fitness from childhood to adolescence in Japanese children. We hypothesised that objective physical activity and physical fitness track from childhood to adolescence in Japanese children.

Main text

Methods

Study design and participants

This study was conducted in Ibara City within the Okayama Prefecture of Japan during 2008–2011 and encompassed all 13 public elementary schools within the city. The first study comprised 368 participants aged 9–10 years (90.6% within the city) in September 2008, and the follow-up study involved 134 participants (aged 13–14 years, with dropout rate of 63.6%) in September 2011. After excluding participants with missing data, a total of 111 participants (46 boys, 65 girls) were included in the study.

Physical activity

Total steps and MVPA were measured using a uniaxial accelerometer (Kenz Lifecorder EX (LC); Suzuken Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Japan). Kumahara et al. [12] have previously reported that this accelerometer samples acceleration at a rate of 32 samples/second and assesses values ranging from 0.06 to 1.94 g. The acceleration signal was filtered using an analogue bandpass filter and subsequently digitised. The maximum pulse over 4 s was measured as the acceleration value and classified into 11 activity levels (0, 0.5 and 1–9). The epoch length of the LC device is 2 min. Sasayama and Adachi [13] showed that the activity level detected using an LC device was significantly correlated with metabolic equivalents (METs) during walking and running in Japanese children (r = 0.883, p < 0.05). They confirmed that the activity level for MVPA (≥ 3 METs) is equivalent to a value of ≥ 5 as detected by the LC device; accordingly, the MVPA cut-off point was based on this finding [13]. Participants wore the LC device on their waists for 5 consecutive weekdays, at all times, excluding while sleeping, swimming, bathing or contact sports. Based on previous studies [14], accelerometer data were collected on at least 3 weekdays. A valid day was defined as at least 600 min of wear time during weekdays [15]. Non-wearing time was defined by at least 60 min of zero consecutive counts [16].

Physical fitness

Physical fitness was assessed using the new National Statistical Survey on Physical Fitness and Motor Ability by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) in Japan (MEXT, 2000). The physical fitness test by MEXT was conducted as follows and test items included hand grip (muscle strength), sit-ups (abdominal strength and endurance), sit and reach (flexibility), side-to-side jump (agility), 20-m shuttle run (cardiorespiratory endurance), 50-m dash (speed), standing broad jump (explosive leg strength) and softball (9–10 years)/handball (13–14 years) throwing (explosive arm strength and throwing ability).

Anthropometry

Height (precision within 0.1 cm) and body weight (precision within 0.1 kg) were measured in light clothing without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the ratio of weight (kg) to height squared (m2).

Statistical analysis

Participant characteristics, physical activity and physical fitness variables were reported as mean ± standard deviations. Characteristic differences in baseline and follow-up were analysed using paired Student’s t test. The associations between the obtained variables were analysed using Spearman correlation coefficient. Values ranging from 0.00 to 0.29 indicate low correlation, from 0.30 to 0.59 indicate moderate correlation and from 0.60 to 1.00 indicate high correlation [11]. All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics software version 24. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of participants at baseline and follow-up

Characteristics of participants at baseline and follow-up are shown in Table 1. For both sexes, all variables of anthropometry, physical activity and physical fitness showed significant differences between baseline and follow-up.
Table 1

Participants of characteristics

 

Boys (n = 46)

Girls (n = 65)

Baseline (2008)

Follow-up (2011)

p value

Baseline (2008)

Follow-up (2011)

p value

Age (years)

9.2 ± 0.4

13.2 ± 0.4

< 0.001

9.1 ± 0.3

13.1 ± 0.3

< 0.001

Height (cm)

134.1 ± 5.8

153.1 ± 8.2

< 0.001

135.1 ± 5.4

152.0 ± 4.1

< 0.001

Weight (kg)

30.7 ± 7.0

44.4 ± 10.2

< 0.001

29.8 ± 4.5

43.9 ± 6.3

< 0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

16.9 ± 2.9

18.8 ± 3.0

< 0.001

16.2 ± 1.7

19.0 ± 2.4

< 0.001

Total steps (steps/day)

18387.7 ± 3876.4

12188.5 ± 4872.9

< 0.001

14627.3 ± 3340.2

11863.4 ± 3153.3

< 0.001

MVPA (min/day)

60.6 ± 18.5

37.3 ± 22.0

< 0.001

39.9 ± 13.5

32.8 ± 14.3

0.004

Hand grip (kg)

14.9 ± 3.0

23.4 ± 6.9

< 0.001

14.0 ± 3.3

21.8 ± 4.6

< 0.001

Sit-ups (count)

19.3 ± 5.7

24.2 ± 6.2

< 0.001

14.6 ± 3.9

18.7 ± 3.9

< 0.001

Sit and reach (cm)

36.5 ± 8.7

40.2 ± 8.5

0.015

37.2 ± 7.7

42.4 ± 7.1

< 0.001

Side-to-side jump (count)

40.5 ± 7.0

48.9 ± 5.8

< 0.001

37.7 ± 5.6

43.4 ± 3.9

< 0.001

20-m shuttle run (count)

45.7 ± 16.8

68.1 ± 20.9

< 0.001

29.9 ± 11.6

46.0 ± 12.8

< 0.001

50-m dash (s)

9.4 ± 0.7

9.0 ± 0.9

< 0.001

9.7 ± 0.7

9.3 ± 0.7

< 0.001

Standing broad jump (cm)

147.6 ± 14.7

174.7 ± 20.7

< 0.001

141.1 ± 16.1

156.9 ± 25.4

< 0.001

Ball throwing (m)

24.6 ± 6.8

19.6 ± 4.5

< 0.001

13.7 ± 5.1

11.4 ± 3.4

< 0.001

Values are means ± standard deviations

BMI: Body mass index; MVPA: moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

p < 0.05 for different baseline and follow-up

Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness

Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness expressed as Spearman correlation coefficients are shown in Table 2. In boys, there was a significant correlation between total steps, MVPA, hand grip, sit-ups, sit and reach, side-to-side jump, 20-m shuttle run, 50-m dash, standing broad jump and ball throwing at baseline and follow-up. In girls, although there was no significant correlation between total steps and MVPA at baseline and follow-up, hand grip, sit-ups, sit and reach, side-to-side jump, 20-m shuttle run, 50-m dash, standing broad jump and ball throwing at baseline and follow-up were significantly correlated.
Table 2

Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness expressed as Spearman correlation coefficients

 

Boys (n = 46)

Girls (n = 65)

r

p value

r

p value

Physical activity

 Total steps (steps/day)

0.319

0.031

0.178

0.156

 MVPA (min/day)

0.352

0.017

0.198

0.114

Physical fitness

 Hand grip (kg)

0.520

< 0.001

0.680

< 0.001

 Sit-ups (count)

0.588

< 0.001

0.575

< 0.001

 Sit and reach (cm)

0.341

0.020

0.303

0.014

 Side-to-side jump (count)

0.470

< 0.001

0.444

< 0.001

 20-m shuttle run (count)

0.618

< 0.001

0.513

< 0.001

 50-m dash (s)

0.736

< 0.001

0.734

< 0.001

 Standing broad jump (cm)

0.548

< 0.001

0.602

< 0.001

 Ball throwing (m)

0.647

< 0.001

0.549

< 0.001

MVPA: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Discussion

The objective evaluation of physical activity by an accelerometer was a notable strength of the study. Adachi et al. [17] have previously reported that the total energy expenditure assessed using the doubly-labelled water method was significantly correlated with total steps and activity level detected using an accelerometer in Japanese children. In Japanese children aged 9–13 years, we found moderate tracking of physical activity (only boys) and moderate to high tracking of physical fitness (both boys and girls).

Previous studies [1821] measuring total physical activity using pedometers or accelerometers have reported that total physical activity tracks from childhood to adolescence at low to moderate levels. Although these studies differ from the current study in terms of the ages of participants, follow-up period and pedometer or accelerometer use, the present study also showed moderate tracking for total steps in boys (Table 2). On the other hand, in our study, tracking was not confirmed for total steps in girls (Table 2). In some previous studies, tracking of total physical activity in both boys and girls reported similar results [20] but some studies [19, 21] showed that high tracking of total physical activity was confirmed in boys compared to girls. Therefore, there are possibilities of gender differences in terms of tracking. This gender difference may be influenced by the fact that total physical activity in girls is lower than that of boys from childhood to adolescence. Indeed, Wolff-Hughes et al. [22] reported that total physical activity in boys was higher than that in girls, regardless of age (6–19 years). Wolff-Hughes et al. [22] also reported that total physical activity in girls tends to sharply decrease at adolescence compared to boys. This phenomenon may influenced tracking from childhood to adolescence.

Previous studies [18, 2326] have reported that MVPA using accelerometer tracks from childhood to adolescence at low to moderate levels. We confirmed that MVPA tracks moderately only in boys from childhood to adolescence (Table 2). It has been reported that MVPA tracking is more robust in girls than in boys [24]. On the other hand, another report showed that MVPA tracking was similar for boys and girls [25]. Therefore, for MVPA as well as total steps, it is necessary to confirm whether there is gender difference in tracking.

Regarding the tracking of physical fitness, it has been reported elsewhere [11] that physical fitness, such as muscular strength and endurance, power or explosive strength, running speed, agility, cardiovascular fitness track at low to moderate levels from childhood to adolescence. In our study, low to high tracking was confirmed in various physical fitness components (Table 2). Therefore, it was suggested that various physical fitness components track from childhood to adolescence in Japanese children.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that objective physical activity in Japanese boys track moderately from childhood to adolescence. In addition, for both Japanese boys and girls, physical fitness track moderately to highly from childhood to adolescence.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, this study comprised a small sample size, had a short tracking term and was conducted only in the Okayama Prefecture in Japan. Since the study was conducted only in the Okayama Prefecture in Japan, its results cannot be applied to other populations or regions. Second, there were no controls for maturity related to physical fitness. Further studies are required with larger sample sizes and including participants from other populations. In addition, it is necessary to examine the maturity level.

Abbreviations

MVPA: 

moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

LC: 

lifecorder

METs: 

metabolic equivalents

MEXT: 

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

BMI: 

body mass index

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the children and parents who participated in this study as well as the teachers for their support.

Funding

No funding was provided.

Authors’ contributions

MA designed the study. MA and KS collected and analysed data. KS wrote the manuscript. MA critically reviewed the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participating children and their parents provided written informed consent before participation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Okayama University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Education, Okayama University of Science, 1-1, Ridai-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005, Japan
(2)
Graduate School of Education, Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

References

  1. Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):732–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Department of Health and Social Care. Start active, stay active: report on physical activity in the UK 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/start-active-stay-active-a-report-on-physical-activity-from-the-four-home-countries-chief-medical-officers. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans: be active, healthy, and happy! 2008. http://www.healthgov/paguidelines/guidelines/defaultaspx. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  6. Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput JP, Connor Gorber S, Dinh T, Duggan M, et al. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S311–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Telama R. Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a review. Obes Facts. 2009;2(3):187–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40(7):539–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjostrom M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. 2008;32(1):1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Malina RM. Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness across the lifespan. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3 Suppl):S48–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Ayabe M, Yoshioka M, Yoshitake Y, Shindo M, et al. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Br J Nutr. 2004;91(2):235–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sasayama K, Adachi M. Association between activity level assessed by a uniaxial accelerometer and metabolic equivalents during walking and running in male youths. J Phys Fit Sports Med. 2016;65(2):265–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mattocks C, Ness A, Leary S, Tilling K, Blair SN, Shield J, et al. Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(Suppl 1):S98–111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Colley R, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay MS. Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity. Health Rep. 2010;21(1):63–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Aadland E, Andersen LB, Anderssen SA, Resaland GK. A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Adachi M, Sasayama K, Hikihara Y, Okishima K, Mizuuchi H, Sunami Y, et al. Assessing daily physical activity in elementary school students used by accelerometer: avalidation study against doubly labeled water method. J Phys Fit Sports Med. 2007;56(3):347–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Basterfield L, Adamson AJ, Frary JK, Parkinson KN, Pearce MS, Reilly JJ. Longitudinal study of physical activity and sedentary behavior in children. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):e24–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nyberg G, Ekelund U, Marcus C. Physical activity in children measured by accelerometry: stability over time. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(1):30–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristensen PL, Moller NC, Korsholm L, Wedderkopp N, Andersen LB, Froberg K. Tracking of objectively measured physical activity from childhood to adolescence: the European youth heart study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(2):171–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Raustorp A, Svenson K, Perlinger T. Tracking of pedometer-determined physical activity: a 5-year follow-up study of adolescents in Sweden. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007;19(2):228–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolff-Hughes DL, Bassett DR, Fitzhugh EC. Population-referenced percentiles for waist-worn accelerometer-derived total activity counts in U.S. youth: 2003–2006 NHANES. PloS ONE. 2014;9(12):e115915.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Raask T, Konstabel K, Maestu J, Latt E, Jurimae T, Jurimae J. Tracking of physical activity in pubertal boys with different BMI over two-year period. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(16):1649–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Francis SL, Morrissey JL, Letuchy EM, Levy SM, Janz KF. Ten-year objective physical activity tracking: Iowa bone development study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(8):1508–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwon S, Janz KF. Tracking of accelerometry-measured physical activity during childhood: ICAD pooled analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Baggett CD, Stevens J, McMurray RG, Evenson KR, Murray DM, Catellier DJ, et al. Tracking of physical activity and inactivity in middle school girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(11):1916–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement