Skip to main content
  • Research note
  • Open access
  • Published:

The prevalence and the reasons of issuing permission for therapeutic abortion in department of forensic medicine, Kermanshah, Iran, during 2005 to 2010



The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and the reasons of issuing permission for therapeutic abortion in department of forensic medicine, Kermanshah-Iran.


There were a total number of 428 applications for issuing permits. The most common reasons of issuing permit for therapeutic abortion were fetal and maternal problems, specifically cerebral abnormalities (70.8%), and anencephaly (30.3%). Furthermore, 354 (82/7%) out of 428 applications were able to get the legal permit and 17.3% of the applications did not receive permission, which was mainly due to “the lack of maternal indication”. Increased knowledge of physicians and clinical personnel on indications of therapeutic abortions and related regulations would lead to the implementation of strategies which prevent void referrals to the department of forensic medicine and a better execution of therapeutic abortion law. By improving the health condition of pregnant women who seek pregnancy termination, informing them about indications of therapeutic abortions, and developing proper strategies to make pregnant women more acquainted with legal cases of abortion, we can take a significant step towards helping pregnant women and promoting their health.


Abortion refers to the removal of conception products before 20th week, when the gestational weight is about 500 g [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), unsafe abortion is a method used to terminate unwanted pregnancy by non-experts or in an environment that lacks minimum medical standards or both [2,3,4]. Today, unsafe abortion is one of the most important global challenges in terms of Public Health and Human Rights [5, 6]. Statistics indicate that, 56% of the abortions in developing countries are done using unsafe methods while only 6% of the abortions in developed countries are done unsafely. However in total, 40% of women at childbearing age are living in the countries where the abortion is banned or is permitted only when the physical and mental health of the mother is in danger [7]. Unsafe abortion is one of the main reasons for death of pregnant women in developing countries [5, 6, 8]. According to the World Health Organization’s statistics, there are 210 million pregnancy cases per year, from which nearly 50 million lead to abortion, 19–20 million of which are done illegally and unsafely outside health centers by non-experts. Based on estimation, 70 thousand women die per year due to complications of unsafe abortions. The death due to unsafe abortion accounts for 13% of total mortality of the pregnant women. However, 97% of the illegal and unsafe abortions happen in developing countries and more than half of them in Asia, which consequently lead to thousands of deaths per year [9,10,11,12]. One out of four mothers, who have had unsafe abortion, will most probably develop severe complications due to unsafe abortion and will require hospitalization [13]. There are no exact statistics on illegal abortions in Iran. However, the statistics reported by the health centers are so shocking that has made the development of relevant legislation inevitable in order to facilitate therapeutic abortion [14]. Prior to the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the abortion was legally banned except in cases where the health of mother was in danger, and the related laws had been formulated regardless of Sharia. However, after Islamic Revolution in Iran, the laws regarding abortion were changed according to Sharia [15]. In recent years, the statistics on illegal abortions, mortality rate of pregnant women and fetal abnormalities in the country and also the shortcoming of laws in this regard have caused related organizations including Ministry of Health and Department of Forensic Medicine to pay attention to this issue and discuss it in the research and scientific centers which led to the approval of an act entitled; “therapeutic abortion” in June 2005. According to this law, abortion is legal in cases where the mother’s life is in danger, and also in cases of fetal abnormalities such as anencephaly, or when the pregnancy produces infant with disorders such as major thalassemia or bilateral polycystic kidney disease. However, the cases of therapeutic abortion should be approved by three specialist physicians with the consent of mothers and final acceptance by the office of legal medicine. Legal abortion is only allowed before week 19th of the pregnancy [1].

In general, every condition that threatens the mother’s health and endangers pregnancy is included as the indication for therapeutic abortion [16]. Since the health of mother is the main element of family and society’s health, lack of information among pregnant women about the legal centers for abortion and complications of illegal and unhealthy abortion endangers their health and creates financial problems for health system of the country. Moreover, developing proper strategies and correct planning in this regard seems to be beneficial. Thus, the present study aimed to examine the frequency and reasons of issuing permission for therapeutic abortion in the department of forensic medicine, Kermanshah-Iran, during 2005 to 2010.

Main text


This descriptive study was conducted over 3-month time between May and June 2018. A total of 428 applications of pregnant women who attended the Department of Forensic Medicine in Kermanshah, Iran from April 2005 to March 2010, to get abortion permit were investigated in this study. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data on age, education level and employment status of mother, fetal age, maternal and fetal indications for abortion, and the number of issued and non-issued permits. First, the researchers obtained the necessary permission from the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and the General Office of Legal Medicine of Kermanshah Province. Later, they attended the Medical Record Department of the General Office of Legal Medicine and examined the applications for therapeutic abortion during 2005–2010 and then completed the questionnaire based on them.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v.16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and descriptive statistic (frequency percentage, mean and standard deviation).

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical sciences. Permission was also obtained from the general office of legal medicine of Kermanshah Province-Iran.


Results of the present study showed that, there were a total of 428 applications for issuing abortion permit during 2005 to 2010. More than 82% of the requests for abortion permit were successful. The average age of the mothers and fetus were 29 ± 7 years and 13 ± 4 weeks, respectively. The minimum and maximum age of fetus was 3 and 29 weeks, respectively and the minimum and maximum age of the mothers were 16 and 47 years, respectively. Most of the participants had under high school education (64.5%) and more than 94% were housewives. The most common reasons for abortion were fetal abnormalities (70.8%) and then maternal complications (29.25%). Also, 82.7% of the cases (354 person) were eligible for abortion, from which, 81% of the permits were issued due to fetal abnormalities and 19% of them were issued because of maternal complications. Meanwhile, fetal anencephaly (30.3%), fetal hydrops (15.3%), major thalassemia (7.6%), hydrocephalus (6.9%) and cystic hygroma (6.9%) were the most common fetal-related causes of obortion, respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, the most common maternal-related reasons for abortion included; cardiovascular diseases and uncontrolled hypertension (9.3%) (Table 2). Among 428 applications for abortion permit, 74 cases (17.3%) could not get the permit, which were mainly due to maternal disease that lacked indication (39.2%), the use of medication by mother (20.2%) and the high fetal age (17.6%) (Table 3).

Table 1 Frequent causes of fetal and maternal issuing permits for therapeutic abortion
Table 2 Frequent causes of not issuing permits for therapeutic abortion
Table 3 Frequent causes of not issuing permits for therapeutic abortion


Results of the present study showed that, more than 82% of the requests for abortion permit were successful. The study of Rostamnejad et al. showed that 55 (70.5%) out of 78 pregnant women applying for abortion permit received the permission and 23 of them (29.5%) did not get the permit [14]. The study of Naeeji et al. also showed that, the abortion permit was issued for 71.8% of those applying to the department of forensic medicine in Tehran and the requests of 28.2% of them were not approved [17]. Furthermore, Souri showed that 70% of the requests for abortion permit were approved [18]. Results of the aforementioned studies indicated that more than two-third of the applications for abortion permit received the permission which indicates the removal of obstacles for therapeutic abortion. This also shows that, a significant step has been taken towards the promotion of women’s health.

In our study, fetal and maternal problems accounted for 81% and 19% of abortion indications, respectively. The study of Dadipoor et al. showed that 87.5% of the applications for abortion permit were due to fetal problems and 12.5% of them were related to maternal complications [19]. Naeeji et al. also found that 80% of the requests for abortion permit were related to fetal problems [17]. Furthermore, the study of Maleki et al. revealed that 78.8% of the therapeutic abortions in 2007 had fetal-related indications [20]. In the study of Rostamnejad [14] 87.2% and in the study of Souri [18] 88% of abortion were due to fetal abnormalities. The study of Ghadipasha [15] and Sayedoshohadaie [21] indicated that fetal problem was the main cause of therapeutic abortions. The results of these studies are in line with the findings of the present study. This is most probably due to increased prenatal care and accuracy of diagnosis such as ultrasound examination and early detection of fetal abnormalities. The physicians have also been increasing their knowledge on indications for therapeutic abortions and refer more mothers for abortion due to fetal problems.

The result showed that, the most important reason for fetal abortion was related to brain disorders, particularly anencephaly (30.3%). However, the study of Dadipoor et al. found thalassemia as the most common cause of abortion (41.5%) followed by anencephaly (18.2%) [19]. Anencephaly was also found to be the cause of 43% of the abortions in the study of Maleki et al. [20]. Result of the Souri’s study showed that 34% of the abortions were due to the fetal skull and brain disorders [18]. This issue requires more attention of the officials to provide proper educational programs for mothers before marriage and pregnancy in order to prevent neural defect tubes. Furthermore, it seems that adopting health strategies such as preventing individuals with minor thalassemia to get married to each other and providing pre-marriage advice for couples would be effective in reducing the ratio of therapeutic abortions caused by major thalassemia.

Results of the present study showed that, the most common maternal reasons for successful abortion permit were related to cardiovascular diseases and uncontrolled hypertension. The study of Souri found the maternal cardiovascular disease and Hematologic disorders as the most common causes of therapeutic abortion [18]. The study of Dadipoor et al. also reported the maternal cardiovascular disease as the most common reason for abortion [19], and the study of Schiavon et al. reported the maternal hypertension as the most common cause of abortion [22]. In our opinion, cardiologists and gynecologists should help the provision of necessary and preventive trainings for this group of mothers to prevent such consequences.

Our results showed that 17.3% of the requests for abortions were not approved, and the most common reasons for that included maternal problems that lacked indication, the use of medication by mothers and the high fetal age. Souri also found that, making application after the legal time, the use of medication by mothers and maternal problems that lack indication are the most common reasons for the rejection of abortion request [18]. According to the law, maternal problems or use of medication by mother without confirmed fetal abnormalities or endangering mother’s life have no indication for therapeutic abortion [1]. None of these requests were approved in this study.

As a conclusion, most of the 428 pregnant women, who applied to the department of forensic medicine to get permission for therapeutic abortion, could get the permission. The fetal problem was the main reason for issuing permits. The most common fetal-related causes included; anencephaly and fetal hydrops. The most common maternal-related causes of issuing abortion permit included cardiovascular diseases and uncontrolled hypertension. In general, it can be claimed that, increased knowledge of physicians and clinical personnel on indications of therapeutic abortions and related regulations would lead to the implementation of strategies which prevent void referrals to the department of forensic medicine and a better execution of therapeutic abortion law. For a better execution of this law, the physicians and clinical staff should not consider the probability of risks for mother or fetus as indications for therapeutic abortion and also should perform comprehensive examination so that, mothers could be introduced to legal abortion centers in case of certain diagnosis.


It is almost impossible to compare the findings of present study with the studies conducted in other countries due to differences in therapeutic abortion legislations.

Availability of data and materials

Data and material are available by contacting to corresponding author. In order to access the raw data, it is necessary to obtain the permission of University Research Vice-Chancellor.


  1. Rahimparvar SV, Jafari A, Hoseinzadeh F, Daemi F, Samadi F. Characteristics of women applying for a legal abortion licence in the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2011–2012. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24:1040–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Åhman E, Shah I. Unsafe abortion: worldwide estimates for 2000. Reprod Health Matters. 2002;10(19):13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Black KI, Douglas H, Costa C. Women’s access to abortion after 20 weeks’ gestation for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: views and experiences of doctors in New South Wales and Queensland. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(2):144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen CJ. Reproductive justice, public policy, and abortion on the basis of fetal impairment: lessons from international human rights law and the potential impact of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. J Law Health. 2015;28:121.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Latt SM, Milner A, Kavanagh A. Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chigbu C, Chigbu C, Iwuji S, Emenalo F, Onyebuchi A. Impact of abortion laws on women’s choice of abortion service providers and facilities in southeastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(9):1114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drovetta RI. Safe abortion information hotlines: an effective strategy for increasing women’s access to safe abortions in Latin America. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chima SC, Mamdoo F. Ethical and legal dilemmas around termination of pregnancy for severe fetal anomalies: a review of two African neonates presenting with ventriculomegaly and holoprosencephaly. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(7):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah I, Åhman E. Unsafe abortion: global and regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(12):1149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bearak JM, Popinchalk A, Sedgh G, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Pregnancies, abortions, and pregnancy intentions: a protocol for modeling and reporting global, regional and country estimates. Reprod health. 2019;16(1):36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gebremedhin M, Semahegn A, Usmael T, Tesfaye G. Unsafe abortion and associated factors among reproductive aged women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baig M, Mubeen K. Determinants of Inadequate Provision and Utilization of Post Abortion Care Services in Pakistan. Journal of Asian Midwives (JAM). 2018;5(1):31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh S, Juarez F, Prada E, Bankole A. Estimating Abortion Incidence: assessment of a Widely Used Indirect Method. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2019;38(3):429–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rostamnejad M, Asadzadeh F, Mostafazadeh F, Karami R, Kazemzadeh R. Compassion the files of the abortion referred to the Ardabil Forensic Medicine Center. J Health Care. 2009;11(4):38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghadipasha M, Aminian Z. The study of abortion licences being issued by legal medicine office of kerman in 2005 and a short comparison with last years issued licences. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2014;14(2):147–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Octavian OG, Ionescu C, Lesnic A, Filipescu GA, Ples L. Ethical and medico-legal aspects of the therapeutic abortion-our experience. Roman J Legal Med. 2018;26(1):82–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Naeeji H, Mirtorabi SD, Shojamoradi MH, Khatami A. The requests for therapeutic abortion in legal medicine organization of tehran: indications for acceptance and rejection. Sci J Foren Med. 2011;1:41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Souri M. Evaluation of approved and non-approved requests for therapeutic abortion in cases referred to legal medicine organization of Lorestan province in 2013. Yafte. 2015;17(2):5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dadipoor S, Moradabadi A, Esmaeelion F. Prevalence of legal abortions and correlated causes in a central women’s hospital in south of Iran (2009–2012). Life Sci J. 2013;10(12s):91–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maleki M. A survey on therapeutic abortion permission in Tehran legal Medicine Center: thesis for legal medicine specialty in Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2005. p. 1–10.

  21. Sayedoshohadaie F, Zandvakili F, Yousefinejad V, Yousefi Z, Gharibi F. Investigation of the causes of therapeutic abortion requests in Legal Medicine Organization in Sanandaj, from 2004 to 2008. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci. 2011;16(3):76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schiavon R, Troncoso E, Polo G. Analysis of maternal and abortion-related mortality in Mexico over the last two decades, 1990–2008. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2012;118:S78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to appreciate the Legal medicine organization of Kermanshah. We also extend our thanks to clinical research development center of Imam Reza Hospital affiliated to Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for their kind help.


This study was funded by Kermanshah University of medical sciences (Grant No. 90222). Funding was used to collect data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AS, MJ and AK contributed in designing the study. AS and MJ collected the data, and analyzed by AK. The final report and article were written by AS, MJ and AK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

The first and third authors are faculty members at nursing and midwifery schools of Nahavand and Kermanshah, respectively. The second author is clinical nurse and a researcher.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Khatony.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by research Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Participant consent was not necessary as this study involved the use of a records of the pregnant women referring to department of forensic medicine.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharifi, A., Janatolmakan, M. & Khatony, A. The prevalence and the reasons of issuing permission for therapeutic abortion in department of forensic medicine, Kermanshah, Iran, during 2005 to 2010. BMC Res Notes 12, 574 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: