Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research note
  • Open access
  • Published:

Factors affecting neonatal mortality in the general population: evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS)—multilevel analysis

BMC Research Notes volume 12, Article number: 610 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

This study was aimed to identify factors affecting neonatal mortality in Ethiopia.

Results

According to the multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of neonatal mortality was significantly associated with husbands with no education (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.10, 4.83), female birth (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39, 0.83), twin birth (AOR = 13.62, 95% CI 7.14, 25.99), pre-term birth (AOR = 15.07, 95% CI 7.80, 29.12) and mothers with no antenatal care (ANC) visit during pregnancy (AOR = 1.90 95% CI 1.11, 3.25).

Introduction

Newborn is defined as an infant in the first 28 days of life after birth and newborn health has an important role in child’s survival and health. Globally, newborn deaths account for 45% of under-five deaths [1]. Three-quarters of newborn deaths result from three preventable and treatable conditions including prematurity, events during childbirth and neonatal infections [2, 3].

In 2017 alone, an estimated 6.3 million children and young adolescents died, mostly from preventable causes. Of all, about 2.5 million deaths occurred before celebrating their 28th days. Among children and young adolescents, the risk of dying was highest in the first month of life with average rate of 18 deaths per 1000 live births [4,5,6]. Despite there is an increase in neonatal mortality across the globe, its burden is highest in West and Central Africa, where the risk of a baby dying within the first 28 days of life is almost 10 times higher than high-income countries [7].

According to the United Nations (UN) mortality estimate in 2013, the neonatal mortality rate in Ethiopia was 28 per 1000 live births. Even though there is an achievement observed in the reduction of neonatal mortality by 48%, still neonatal mortality is high [8]. Additionally, according to the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS) 2011, it ranges from as low as 53/1000 live births in Addis Ababa to as high as 169/1000 live births in Benishangul-Gumuz region [8, 9].

According to different studies suggested there are many factors contributing to neonatal mortality. Among these: educational level [10], sex of the neonate, duration of pregnancy [11], home delivery without skilled provider [12], pregnancy complication [13], birth weight [14, 15], delay in seeking care during illness [16, 17], lack of preparedness of families and care providers, harmful cultural practices [18], economic status [19], social exclusion, maternal illiteracy [20], negative parental attitudes arising from the social environment, gender bias, inability to pay for care [20], and lack of basic prenatal, natal, and postnatal services [7, 21] were the main determinants of poor newborn survival rates in developing countries [22,23,24,25,26].

In 2014, at the Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly, 194 member states of the WHO develop action plan that was targeted to end preventable deaths and stillbirths [19]. Similarly, Ethiopia has endorsed strategies to halt the burden of neonatal mortality through ANC, postnatal care (PNC), immunization during and after pregnancy, and skill birth attendance. Despite there is a reduction in neonatal mortality, still there is a need to have focused attention on newborn interventions [10]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify factors affecting neonatal mortality in Ethiopia.

Main text

Methods

Community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Ethiopia from January 18 to June 27, 2016. There are nine regional states and two city administrations subdivided into 68 zones, 817 districts and 16,253 kebeles (lowest local administrative units of the country).

The target group for this study was all neonates in Ethiopia, and those neonates in the selected enumeration areas (EA) were the study population. Stratified two stage cluster sampling was performed. Samples of EAs were selected independently in each stratum in two stages. Firstly, a total of 645 EAs (202 in urban and 443 in rural areas) were selected with probability sampling proportional to EA size and secondly, a fixed number of 28 households per cluster were selected randomly. A total of 18,008 households were randomly selected, and 15,683 eligible women were interviewed. Data on 10,641 live births were extracted from 2016 EDHS.

Secondary data source from 2016 EDHS was used. Approval letter was obtained from the measure DHS and the data set was downloaded from the DHS website (http://www.measuredhs.com).

The outcome variable for this study was neonatal death which was defined as the death of a live birth within the first month of life. Individual level factors included in this study were; current age of the mother, marital status, educational status both for the mother and the father, mothers occupational status, size of child at birth, child sex, birth order, duration of pregnancy, preceding birth interval and weather the child is twin or not, place of delivery, number of ANC visits, number of tetanus toxoid (TT) injections during pregnancy, mode of delivery and wealth index. Household wealth index was originally classified into five categories by DHS which was done using principal component analysis. However, in this study we further classified it into poor, medium, and rich. Community level factors included in this study were residence and region. Training was given for data collectors and supervisors and the questioner was pretested.

After data was extracted editing, coding and cleaning were performed. Both descriptive and analytic statistic was computed. Since the data had hierarchical and clustering nature, mixed effect logit model (multilevel model) was fitted to identify factors associated with neonatal death. Due to the fact that the rate of neonatal death varies from cluster to cluster, a cluster level random intercept was introduced in the mixed logit model. The within cluster correlation was measured using intra cluster correlation (ICC) which is expected to be ≥ 10% to use the model. To test the significance of the variance of random intercept, the likelihood ratio test was applied. Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence level was reported to show the strength of the association and its significance. Variables having p-value < 0.05 was considered as having significant association with the outcome. The model goodness of fit was checked using deviance information criteria (DIC). The data was analyzed using Stata Version 14.

Results

Socio demographic and economic characteristics of mothers

A total of 10,641 live births were included in this study. Of these, 8667 (81.45%) were from rural residence and 1581 (14.86%) were from Oromia region. Majority 3161 (29.7%) of the mothers were in the age group of 25–19 years. More than half 5775 (54.3%) of the households were in a poor wealth quintile. Around 6838 (64%) of the mothers and almost half the husbands had no formal education (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio demographic and economic characteristics of participants, EDHS 2016
Full size table

Child characteristics and maternal health service use

Of 10,641 live births, more than half 5483 (51.5%) were male. Of the total live births, 3338 (31.4%) were in birth order 2nd–3rd and 10,455 (98.3%) were term births. The preceding birth interval for the majority 6356 (59.7%) of live births were 2 years and above. From a total of 7193 mothers of a new born, majority 4712 (65.5%) had at least one ANC visit during their pregnancy (Table 2).

Table 2 Maternal health service use and child characteristics of participants, EDHS 2016
Full size table

Factors associated with neonatal mortality

After excluding 32.4% missing data, the multivariable multilevel model was fitted and found ICC of 11% (95% CI 6.2, 18.6) and deviance of 1167.68. From the final model, being born from a mother whose husband had no education increase the odds of neonatal death by 2.30 (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.10, 4.83) times compared to husbands with secondary education and above education. Being born from a mother whose husband had primary education increases the odds of neonatal death by 2.85 (AOR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.38, 5.90) times as compared to husbands with secondary education and above. The odds of neonatal death was decreased by 43% (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39, 0.83) among female births compared to their counterparts. The odds of neonatal death was 13.62 (AOR = 13.62, 95% CI 7.14, 25.99) times higher among twin births as compared to singleton. The odds of neonatal death was 15.07 (AOR = 15.07, 95% CI 7.80, 29.12) times higher among pre term births compared to term. The odds of neonatal death was 1.9 (AOR = 1.90 95% CI 1.11, 3.25) times higher for births to mother who didn’t have ANC during pregnancy compared to mothers who had ≥ 4 ANC visits (Table 3).

Table 3 Multilevel multivariable logistic regression output for determinants of neonatal mortality among live births in Ethiopia, 2016
Full size table

Discussion

This study was conducted among neonates in Ethiopia. Accordingly husband education, child sex, child twin, duration of pregnancy, and number of ANC visit were significantly associated with neonatal death.

The odds of neonatal death was higher among births to mother whose husband had no education and primary education compared to husbands with secondary education and above. This finding was in line with the study conducted in northwest Ethiopia [10]. This could be husbands having secondary and above level of education resulted in better knowledge of solutions and critical decisions during crisis. In addition, better education creates opportunity for better economic status [10].

The odds of neonatal death was lower among female births compared with male births. This finding is in agreement with a study from Ghana [11], Nigeria [27], and Indonesia [28]. Accordingly, male neonates were at higher risk of death than female neonates. This could be attributed by the different protein and gene expression in both male and female fetuses due to variation in placenta especially during adverse condition. Besides, the same extracellular micro RNA may show up regulation in females and down regulation in male fetuses within the intrauterine milieu. These makes females to have a natural survival advantage than males [29].

The odds of neonatal death was higher among twin births compared with singleton births. This study was supported by a study conducted in Korea [30]. The possible explanation could be twin pregnancy is usually associated with prematurity, which is the most common cause of neonatal death and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome which further leads to death [31]. In addition, twin pregnancy is usually end up with low birth weight which increase child vulnerability to infection and decreases their immunity [27]. As a result, child survival is decreased. This study was also consistent with a study done from 60 nationally-representative Demographic and Health Surveys data [32].

In this study, preterm birth was associated with higher odds of neonatal death compared with term pregnancy. This finding was in agreement with a study done in Ghana [11], Ethiopia [17, 33], and Indonesia [28]. This could be the fact that preterm neonates were unable to fit the extra uterine life because of poor lung maturation, resulted in unable to breathe and hypoxia, ends with death [34]. Therefore, during preterm birth to enhance fetal lung maturation betamethasone is recommended [35]. Besides preterm neonates were at higher risk of vitamin D deficiency, which resulted in respiratory distress [36] and further end up with death.

Being born from a mother with no ANC visit increase the odds of neonatal death compared to mothers with ≥ 4 ANC visits. This result was supported by the study conducted in Nigeria [27], Sub-Saharan Africa [21], and Iran [37]. The possible reason could be women having ANC visit have a chance of prompt detection of complication and early initiation of breastfeeding, which boost the immunity of a child [36, 38]. In addition, women who had complete ANC follow up had increased probability of giving birth by skilled birth attendant, which decreases the odds of neonatal death [37]. Moreover, ANC follow up usually leads to have quality essential new born cares, which increase neonatal survival [39].

This study has both public and clinical importance. For the public it gives direct information regarding the possible cause of neonatal death and alerts them to take the possible appropriate interventions. In addition, identifying determinates of mortality gives information for clinicians to take prompt intervention and response to halt the high burden of neonatal death.

Conclusion

In this study husband with no or primary education, being male neonate, being twin birth, preterm pregnancy, and having no ANC visit were statistically significant predictors of neonatal death. Therefore, women should be encouraged to have ANC visit. Close follow up and monitoring should also be given for twin and preterm births.

Limitation

This study shares the limitation of cross-sectional study to create temporal relationship between the exposure and the outcome variable. This study might also be affected because of residual confounding factors that are not assessed in this study and misclassification of variables like size of the child at birth.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available on https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Abbreviations

ANC:

antenatal care

AOR:

adjusted odds ratio

ARR:

annual reduction rate

CI:

confidence interval

CS:

cesarean section

DIC:

deviance information criteria

EA:

enumeration area

EDHS:

Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey

ICC:

intra cluster correlation

PNC:

postnatal care

SDG:

sustainable development goal

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

TT:

tetanus toxoid

UN:

United Nations

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Twelfth annual report of the perinatal and maternal mortality review committee reporting mortality and morbidity 2016 eighth report to the Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand. 2018. http://www.hqscgovtnz/our-programmes/mrc/pmmrc.

  2. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank, United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (IGME). Levels and trends in child mortality: report 2015. New York: UNICEF; 2015. http://www.childmortality.org.

  4. UNICEF, Organization WH. Levels & trends in child mortality estimates developed by the UN inter-agency group for child mortality estimation report 2018.

  5. World Health Organization. The world health report 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva: WHO; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team: 4 million neonatal deaths: when? where? why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wardlaw T, You D, Hug L, Amouzou A, Newby H. UNICEF report: enormous progress in child survival but greater focus on newborns urgently needed. In: Reproductive health, vol. 11, no. 1, article 82, 2014. https://data.unicef.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/12/Enormous-progress-in-child-survival.220.pdf.

  8. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health Sector Transformation Plan 2015/16–2019/20 (2008-2012 EFY). 2015.

  9. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey. 2011 central statistical agency Addis Ababa. Maryland: Ethiopia ICF International Calverton; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yaya Y, Eide KT, Norheim OF, Lindtjorn B. Maternal and neonatal mortality in south-west Ethiopia: estimates and socio-economic inequality. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Annan GN, Asiedu Y. Predictors of neonatal deaths in Ashanti Region of Ghana: a cross-sectional study. Adv Public Health. 2018;2018:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akinyemi JO, Bamgboye EA, Ayeni O. Trends in neonatal mortality in Nigeria and effects of bio-demographic and maternal characteristics. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Titaley CR, Dibley MJ, Agho K, Roberts CL, Hall J. Determinants of neonatal mortality in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reyes JC, Ramírez RO, Ramos LL, Ruiz LM, Vázquez EA, et al. Neonatal mortality and associated factors in newborn infants admitted to a Neonatal Care Unit. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018;116:42–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smeeton NC, Rona RJ, Dobson P, Cochrane R, Wolfe C. Assessing the determinants of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths using routinely collected data in an inner city area. BMC Med. 2004;2:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379:2151–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bogale TN, Worku AG, Bikis GA, Kebede ZT. Why gone too soon? Examining social determinants of neonatal deaths in northwest Ethiopia using the three delay model approach. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paudel D, Thapa A, Shedain PR, Paudel B. Trends and determinants of neonatal mortality in Nepal further analysis of the Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys, 2001–2011. 2013.

  19. World Health Organization, UNICEF. 2018 progress report: reaching every newborn national 2020 milestones. 2018.

  20. Rarani MA, Rashidian A, Khosravi A, Arab M, Abbasian E, et al. Changes in socio-economic inequality in neonatal mortality in Iran between 1995–2000 and 2005–2010: an Oaxaca decomposition analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6:219–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amouzou A, Ziqi M, Carvajal-Aguirre L, Quinley J. Skilled attendant at birth and newborn survival in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Glob Health. 2017;7:020504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhutta ZA, Cabral S, Chan CW, Keenan WJ. Reducing maternal, newborn, and infant mortality globally: an integrated action agenda. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(Suppl 1):S13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet. 2005;365(9463):977–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fort AL, Kothari MT, Abderrahim N. Association between maternal, birth and newborn characteristics and neonatal mortality in five Asian countries. DHS Working Papers No. 55. Calverton: Macro International; 2008.

  25. Garg P, Gogia S. Reducing neonatal mortality in developing countries: low-cost interventions are the key determinants. J Perinatol. 2009;29(1):74–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar V, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Misra RP, Santosham M, Awasthi S, Baqui AH, Singh P, Singh V, Ahuja RC, Singh JV, Malik GK, Ahmed S, Black RE, Bhandari M, Darmstadt GL. Effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9644):1151–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Townsend R, Khalil A. Fetal growth restriction in twins. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;49:79–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Titaley CR, Dibley MJ, Agho K, Roberts CL, Hall J. Determinants of neonatal mortality in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alur P. Sex differences in nutrition, growth, and metabolism in preterm infants. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ko HS, Wie JH, Choi SK, Park IY, Park YG, et al. Multiple birth rates of Korea and fetal/neonatal/infant mortality in multiple gestation. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hehir MP, McTiernan A, Martin A, Carroll S, Gleeson R, et al. Improved perinatal mortality in twins-changing practice and technologies. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:84–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bellizzi S, Sobel H, Betran AP, Temmerman M. Early neonatal mortality in twin pregnancy: findings from 60 low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Health. 2018;8:010404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mengesha HG, Lerebo WT, Kidanemariam A, Gebrezgiabher G, Berhane Y. Pre-term and post-term births: predictors and implications on neonatal mortality in Northern Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2016;15:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallacher DJ, Hart K, Kotecha S. Common respiratory conditions of the newborn. Breathe. 2016;12:30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Noben L, Verdurmen KMJ, Warmerdam GJJ, Vullings R, Oei SG, et al. The fetal electrocardiogram to detect the effects of betamethasone on fetal heart rate variability. Early Hum Dev. 2019;130:57–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gatera VA, Abdulah R, Musfiroh I, Judistiani RTD, Setiabudiawan B. Updates on the status of vitamin D as a risk factor for respiratory distress syndrome. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2018;2018:8494816.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Amini Rarani M, Rashidian A, Khosravi A, Arab M, Abbasian E, et al. Changes in socio-economic inequality in neonatal mortality in Iran between 1995–2000 and 2005–2010: an Oaxaca decomposition analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;6:219-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Phukan D, Ranjan M, Dwivedi LK. Impact of timing of breastfeeding initiation on neonatal mortality in India. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tafere TE, Afework MF, Yalew AW. Does antenatal care service quality influence essential newborn care (ENC) practices? In Bahir Dar City Administration, North West Ethiopia: a prospective follow up study. Ital J Pediatr. 2018;44:105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Measure DHS international program for providing the data set.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Haileab Fekadu Wolde, Temesgen Yihunie Akalu, Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki & Ayenew Molla Lakew

  2. Department of Human Nutrition, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Kedir Abdela Gonete

Authors
  1. Haileab Fekadu Wolde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kedir Abdela Gonete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Temesgen Yihunie Akalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ayenew Molla Lakew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors actively participate on conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. HFW, KAG and TYA, AGB, AML critically revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haileab Fekadu Wolde.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission was obtained to use the EDHS data from Measure DHS international program. The data is publicly available and has no personal identifiers.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolde, H.F., Gonete, K.A., Akalu, T.Y. et al. Factors affecting neonatal mortality in the general population: evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS)—multilevel analysis. BMC Res Notes 12, 610 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4668-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4668-3

Keywords

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us