Skip to main content

Early exposure to environment sounds and the development of cortical auditory evoked potentials of preterm infants during the first 3 months of life

Abstract

Objective

Preterm infants are exposed earlier than their term counterparts to unattenuated sounds from the external environment during the sensitive period of the organization of the auditory cortical circuitry. In the current study, we investigate the effect of preterm birth on the course of development of auditory cortical areas by evaluating how gestational age (GA) correlates with the latency of the P1 component of the cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) of two experimental groups measured at 1 or 3 months of age.

Results

Our sample consisted of 23 infants delivered at GA ranging from 31.28 to 41.42 weeks and separated into two groups evaluated transversally at 1 or 3 months of corrected age (CA). In the group evaluated at 1-month CA, the latency of the component P1 was similar in both terms and infants classified as late-preterm (GA > 32 weeks). However, in the group evaluated at 3 months CA, P1 latency was significantly smaller in preterms. These preliminary results suggest an acceleration of the development of auditory cortical pathways in preterms, probably due to their early exposure to socially relevant auditory stimuli from the external environment.

Introduction

The remarkable adaptability of the human brain results from the interplay of both evolutionary and developmental mechanisms. Genetically determined developmental programs set up the stage upon which cortical circuits are sculpted by experience and learning, particularly during the sensitive periods of synaptic plasticity [1,2,3]. The primary auditory cortex is structurally mature as early as 28 weeks of gestation [4] and already responds electrically to sounds in the low-frequency range associated with speech [5, 6]. This could explain why newborns can discriminate their mothers’ voice immediately after birth [7, 8].

While our understanding of the prenatal emergence of the cortical organization has traditionally depended on animal-based research, due to ethical concerns, preterm birth offers a unique opportunity to investigate this issue in human subjects as well. The extra period of sensory stimulation afforded by preterms allows the earlier maturation of binocular vision and thalamocortical connectivity to the primary somatosensory cortex [9, 10].

Preterm birth is characterized by delivery before 37 weeks of GA [11, 12] and the following sub-categories of preterms are proposed, based on GA: extremely preterm (< 28 weeks), very preterm (28 to < 32 weeks), and moderate to late preterm (32 to < 37 weeks) [13]. Most preterm births (> 70%) are considered late-preterm (34 to < 37 weeks) [14] and they account for about 85 of all births [15]. Since late-preterm births occur during the period when cortical volume increases by 50% (34–40 weeks), there is a pressing need to understand the possible effects of premature exposure to the extrauterine environment in this population [15, 16].

The cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) is characterized by waveforms with positive and negative deflections occurring between 0 and 300 ms after sound onset in adults. The earliest components are called P1 and N1 and are already present in newborns [17, 18]. The latency of the P1 component shows a steady decrease until it stabilizes in adulthood [19,20,21,22] and has been proposed as a biomarker for the maturation of cortical sensory pathways [17, 21, 23]. In the present study, we evaluate the development of the cortical auditory pathway of late preterms in the first 3 months of life.

Main text

Methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (#340.110) and written informed parental consent was obtained on behalf of all participants. The participants were 23 newborns (GA: 31.28–41.42 weeks) recruited at the Maternity School of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte according to the following inclusion criteria: no signs of hearing problems during routine maternity screening, normal Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) with a click and normal threshold for ABR tone burst at 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 4000 Hz in both ears, normal Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) and tympanometry result with curve type A in both ears. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics and birth outcomes of mothers and infants.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and birth outcomes

Procedure and stimuli

The design of the study was cross-sectional and the subjects were evaluated at 1 or 3 months after birth and were divided into two groups according to their GA: preterm or term. For the CAEP recordings, subjects were accommodated either on a car seat or in the caregivers’ lap within a sound-attenuated room. All tests were performed while infants were in stage 4 of the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale [24]: alert, awake state.

We used ER-3A insert phones (Etymotic Research, Inc.) for sound delivery to the right ear and the CAEP recordings were performed with a Smart EP USB Jr system with two channels (Intelligent Hearing Systems, Inc.). The CAEP was recorded on channel A, while channel B was used to register eye movements for off-line artifact removal and to determine the rejection level for each session. Disposable surface electrodes were used for the recording procedures. The CAEP was recorded at the midline (Cz) and referenced to the right mastoid. The ground electrode was placed at the left mastoid. All electrode impedances were less than 3 kΩ. A minimum of 150 stimuli was presented and the resulting signal, within an analysis window of − 100 ms pre-stimulus and 500 ms post-stimulus, was averaged at both 70 dB NA and 0 dB NA after band-pass filtering from 1 to 30 Hz. The gain in both channels was 100,000. The rate of the stimulus was 1.9 s.

Auditory responses were recorded in response to a/da/speech stimulus with an intensity of 70 dB HL and with an interstimulus interval of 526.00 ms. The/da/sound was recorded with the software praat (https://www.praat.org) using a unidirectional microphone in an acoustically isolated room [25]. The latency of component P1 was determined as the first positive peak after 50 ms, following a negative decline. The latency of the P1 component was confirmed independently by two experienced judges.

Statistical analysis

Only 2-sided tests and nonparametric statistical tests were used due to the non-normal distribution of variables and/or sample size. Sample characteristics were compared using Pearson’s Chi square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Samples’ comparison at 1- and 3-months CA were performed with a two-tailed Mann–Whitney rank sum U test. The relationship between GA and p1 latency was assessed with the Spearman correlation (r). The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results

P1 latency is not correlated with GA at both 1 (rs = 0.44, p = 0.183) and 3 (rs = 0.49, p = 0.109) months CA. We computed linear regression lines to fit the P1 latency data (Fig. 1a) and though the slopes of regression lines were not significantly different (p = 0.63) (see Additional file 1: Table S1), their elevations are significantly different from each other (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

a P1 latencies recorded at 1- and 3-months CA as a function of GA. Linear regression lines are superimposed on the raw data for the CAEP recordings at 1- or 3-months CA, respectively. b Latency of the P1 component of the CAEP of preterm (GA < 37 weeks) and term (GA ≥ 37 weeks) infants recorded at 1- or 3-months CA. Lines represent the median. *p < 0.05

According to Table 1, the demographic characteristics and birth outcomes of terms and preterms are similar, except for birth weight, which is lower in preterms (p < 0.05). Our sample is composed mostly of moderate to late preterms (GA 32 to < 37 weeks), which represent about 10% of all births [26]. Their prematurity ranged from 0.15 to 5.72 weeks (average 2.78 ± 1.58 weeks).

For the infants evaluated at 1-month, the average latency of the P1 component was not significantly different between terms (309.40 ± 78.32 ms) and preterms (295.30 ± 47.66 ms) (U = 10, p = 0.4242) (Fig. 1b). However, for the group evaluated at 3-months, average P1 latency was 240.80 ± 57.67 ms for terms and 171.1 ± 26.44 ms for preterms, respectively (Fig. 1b), and significantly lower for the latter (U = 5, p < 0.05). The grand average CAEP waveforms at 1- and 3-months are shown in Fig. 2a, b, respectively. The latency of the P1 component at 3-months is smaller than at 1-month for the preterm group (176.00 ± 29.16 ms vs 295 ± 47.65 ms; U = 1, p = 0.005), but not the term group (247.00 ± 64,64 ms vs. 309.40 ± 78.31 ms; U = 17, p = 0.1111).

Fig. 2
figure2

Grand average waveforms of the CAEP of the term and preterm groups recorded at 1- (a) and 3-months (b) CA. The arrows indicate the P1 component

Discussion

The maturation of cortical circuits is coordinated by genetic and experience-dependent mechanisms [27]. The susceptibility of developing cortical circuits to environmental factors begins in the womb [28] and this is underscored the capacity of human newborns to immediately interact with their caregivers [7, 29, 30].

The last trimester of gestation is marked by rapid cortical growth [31, 32]. While the premature exposure to the extrauterine environment during this period may interfere with the maturation of association areas and increase the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment [33], the rate of cortical maturation is not synchronous across cortical regions [4, 34]. In the primary auditory cortex, for instance, developmental changes in cortical microstructure have largely occurred by 28 weeks of gestation [4]. This differential pattern of cortical maturation might explain why non-primary areas are more vulnerable to disruption due to premature exposure to the extrauterine environment [35, 36] while primary areas may experience an acceleration in maturation [9, 10]. According to our findings (see Fig. 1b), the earlier exposure to extrauterine sound stimulation in late-preterm infants probably speeds up the maturation of auditory cortical circuits and improves the efficiency of auditory input processing in this population during the first months of postnatal life [37].

An earlier study [38] had already reported that P1 latency was similar in 1-month-old terms and preterms. However, our study is the first to show that P1 latency in a group of 3 months old infants is shorter in moderate-to-late preterms (see Fig. 1b). Previous works had shown that P1 latency steadily decreases from around 250 ms in 1-month-old infants towards 100 ms in adults [39, 40]. The smaller P1 latency of preterms in the 3-month CA group probably reflects the accelerating maturational effects of early exposure to the extrauterine environment, which usually includes speech stimulation [41].

Other studies had already investigated the effect of preterm birth on the maturation of auditory cortical pathways in pre-schoolers using P1 as a biomarker [42,43,44,45]. However, the preterms in those studies were classified as extreme/very-preterm and the poor results they observed in comparison to controls may have been influenced by concurrent clinical conditions associated with extreme prematurity [45].

The neural mechanisms associated with the accelerating effects of preterm birth on the maturation of cortical pathways remain to be determined. One possibility is an increase in the effectiveness of thalamocortical connectivity with the primary auditory cortex [1] due to precocious exposure to the external social environment. A similar effect was reported previously in the primary somatosensory cortex of very preterm infants (GA < 33 weeks) following the premature exposure to activities such as breastfeeding and bottle-feeding [10].

A previous study [46] had shown that the latencies of components N1 and P2 are shorter in term than in preterm infants at 3 months of GA. While this result is the opposite we observed in the present work, we suppose this difference stems from the choice of auditory stimuli and the biomarker for physiological maturation. In that study [46], the stimulus was a click while we used speech stimuli (the phoneme/da/). Also, we used the latency of the P1 component as a biomarker, the gold standard for evaluating the maturation of cortical auditory pathways [17, 21, 23, 47, 48].

Our results are corroborated by other studies that show the advantages of prematurity in auditory recognition memory [49], binocular vision [9], and language comprehension [50]. Thus, even though preterm birth is associated with many neurodevelopmental risks, especially in small for gestational age (SGA) infants [32], the early exposure to socially relevant stimuli can enhance the maturation of sensory pathways [51]. Though our results differ from studies using visual evoked potentials (VEP) that show that preterm birth negatively affects the development of visual pathways [52, 53], the preterm group in those studies was composed of very preterm infants, which may have been SGA at birth.

Conclusion

The present results reinforce the notion that early exposure to socially relevant environments contributes to the adaptive maturation of sensory pathways. This understanding is of practical importance since preterm birth is on the rise worldwide. Many preterms need to remain hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), isolated from their parents, and subject to continuous loud noises or visual deprivation [54]. These conditions can be further detrimental to the maturation of cortical sensory circuits due to their effect on the levels of stress hormones. Fortunately, the young brain is remarkably resilient and can overcome early insults when provided access to appropriate care, stimulation, and follow-up measures [55].

Limitations

The main limitations of the present work are (1) the small sample number, (2) the need to use a cross-sectional, instead of a longitudinal experimental design, and (3) the fact that we only considered the role of extrinsic variables (environmental exposure), while it is known that cortical maturation is influenced by intrinsic variables as well.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, AP. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.

Abbreviations

ABR:

Auditory brainstem response

CA:

Corrected age

CAEP:

Cortical auditory evoked potential

DPOAE:

Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions

GA:

Gestational age

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

SGA:

Small for gestational age

VEP:

Visual evoked potential

References

  1. 1.

    Barkat TR, Polley DB, Hensch TK. A critical period for auditory thalamocortical connectivity. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(9):1189–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    de Araújo Costa Folha OA, Bahia CP, de Aguiar GPS, Herculano AM, Coelho NLG, de Sousa MBC, et al. Effect of chronic stress during adolescence in prefrontal cortex structure and function. Behav Brain Res. 2017;326:44–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hensch TK. Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(11):877–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Monson BB, Eaton-Rosen Z, Kapur K, Liebenthal E, Brownell A, Smyser CD, et al. Differential rates of perinatal maturation of human primary and non-primary auditory cortex. eNeuro. 2018;5(1):ENEURO.0380-17.2017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Birnholz J, Benacerraf B. The development of human fetal hearing. Science. 1983;222(4623):516–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rotteveel JJ, de Graaf R, Stegeman DF, Colon EJ, Visco YM. The maturation of the central auditory conduction in preterm infants until three months post term. V. The auditory cortical response (ACR). Hearing Res. 1987;27(1):95–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    DeCasper A, Fifer W. Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science. 1980;208(4448):1174–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hepper PG, Scott D, Shahidullah S. Newborn and fetal response to maternal voice. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1993;11(3):147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jando G, Miko-Barath E, Marko K, Hollody K, Torok B, Kovacs I. Early-onset binocularity in preterm infants reveals experience-dependent visual development in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(27):11049–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Toulmin H, Beckmann CF, O’Muircheartaigh J, Ball G, Nongena P, Makropoulos A, et al. Specialization and integration of functional thalamocortical connectivity in the human infant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(20):6485–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Abbott A. Neuroscience: the brain, interrupted. Nature. 2015;518(7537):24–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. The Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller A-B, et al. Born Too Soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller A-B, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Loftin RW, Habli M, Snyder CC, Cormier CM, Lewis DF, Defranco EA. Late preterm birth. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010;3(1):10–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Adams-Chapman I. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the late preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33(4):947–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N. Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear Hear. 2000;21(6):554–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    de Melo Â, Biaggio EPV, Rechia IC, Sleifer P. Potenciais evocados auditivos corticais em neonatos nascidos a termo e pré-termo. CoDAS. 2016;28(5):491–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Moore DR. Auditory development and the role of experience. Br Med Bull. 2002;63(1):171–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shafer VL, Yu YH, Datta H. The development of English vowel perception in monolingual and bilingual infants: neurophysiological correlates. J Phon. 2011;39(4):527–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shafer VL, Yu YH, Wagner M. Maturation of cortical auditory evoked potentials (Caeps) to speech recorded from frontocentral and temporal sites: three months to eight years of age. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;95(2):77–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sharma A, Gilley PM, Dorman MF, Baldwin R. Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(9):494–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P, Bauer P, Sweeney MH, Gilley P, et al. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(8):564–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal behavioral assessment scale (Clinics in developmental medicine). Mac Keith Press.; 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=503755. Accessed May 28 2020.

  25. 25.

    Banhara MR. Potenciais auditivos de longa latência: N1, P2, N2, P300, evocados por estímulo de fala em usuários de implante coclear [Mestrado em Fisiopatologia Experimental]. [São Paulo]: Universidade de São Paulo; 2007. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/5/5160/tde-17102014-111320/. Accessed May 28 2020.

  26. 26.

    United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Natality public-use data on CDC WONDER Online Database, for years 2016–2018 (Expanded). CDC Wonder. United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS); 2019. https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality-expanded-current.html. Accessed May 27 2020.

  27. 27.

    Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(9):697–709.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sanes DH, Bao S. Tuning up the developing auditory CNS. Curr Op Neurobiol. 2009;19(2):188–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Partanen E, Kujala T, Naatanen R, Liitola A, Sambeth A, Huotilainen M. Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(37):15145–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Webb AR, Heller HT, Benson CB, Lahav A. Mother’s voice and heartbeat sounds elicit auditory plasticity in the human brain before full gestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(10):3152–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kostović I, Jovanov-Milošević N. The development of cerebral connections during the first 20–45 weeks’ gestation. Sem Fetal Neonat Med. 2006;11(6):415–22.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Malik S, Vinukonda G, Vose LR, Diamond D, Bhimavarapu BBR, Hu F, et al. Neurogenesis continues in the third trimester of pregnancy and is suppressed by premature birth. J Neurosci. 2013;33(2):411–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Katz J, Lee ACC, Kozuki N, Black RE. Mortality risk among term and preterm small for gestational age infants. In: Embleton ND, Katz J, Ziegler EE, editors. Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series. S. Karger AG; 2015. p. 29–35. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/365800. Accessed May 28 2020.

  34. 34.

    Ball G, Srinivasan L, Aljabar P, Counsell SJ, Durighel G, Hajnal JV, et al. Development of cortical microstructure in the preterm human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(23):9541–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Polin RA, Fox WW, Abman SH. Fetal and neonatal physiology: expert consult (2-volume set). London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang Y, Inder TE, Neil JJ, Dierker DL, Alexopoulos D, Anderson PJ, et al. Cortical structural abnormalities in very preterm children at 7 years of age. NeuroImage. 2015;109:469–79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lebenberg J, Mangin J-F, Thirion B, Poupon C, Hertz-Pannier L, Leroy F, et al. Mapping the asynchrony of cortical maturation in the infant brain: a MRI multi-parametric clustering approach. NeuroImage. 2019;185:641–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Didoné D, Garcia M, da Silveira A. Long latency auditory evoked potential in term and premature infants. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;18(01):016–20.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Moore JK, Linthicum FH. The human auditory system: a timeline of development. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(9):460–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ. A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hearing. 2002;23(6):532–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vouloumanos A, Werker JF. Listening to language at birth: evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Dev Sci. 2007;10(2):159–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Green M, Solnit AJ. Reactions to the threatened loss of a child: a vulnerable child syndrome. Pediatric management of the dying child, part III. Pediatrics. 1964;34:58–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hövel H, Partanen E, Huotilainen M, Lindgren M, Rosén I, Fellman V. Auditory event-related potentials at preschool age in children born very preterm. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(3):449–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hövel H, Partanen E, Tideman E, Stjernqvist K, Hellström-Westas L, Huotilainen M, et al. Auditory event-related potentials are related to cognition at preschool age after very preterm birth. Pediatr Res. 2015;77(4):570–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Suppiej A, Cainelli E, Cappellari A, Ermani M, Sartori S, Bisiacchi PS. Neonatal cortical auditory evoked potentials are affected by clinical conditions occurring in early prematurity: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32(5):419–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pasman JW, Rotteveel JJ, de Graaf R, Stegeman DF, Visco YM. The effect of preterm birth on brainstem, middle latency and cortical auditory evoked responses (BMC AERs). Early Hum Dev. 1992;31(2):113–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ceponiene R, Rinne T, Näätänen R. Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(6):870–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wunderlich JL, Cone-Wesson BK. Maturation of CAEP in infants and children: a review. Hearing Res. 2006;212(1–2):212–23.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    deRegnier R-A, Wewerka S, Georgieff MK, Mattia F, Nelson CA. Influences of postconceptional age and postnatal experience on the development of auditory recognition memory in the newborn infant. Dev Psychobiol. 2002;41(3):216–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gonzalez-Gomez N, Nazzi T. Phonotactic acquisition in healthy preterm infants: phonotactic acquisition in preterm infants. Dev Sci. 2012;15(6):885–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fenoglio A, Georgieff MK, Elison JT. Social brain circuitry and social cognition in infants born preterm. J Neurodev Disord. 2017;9(1):27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sayeur MS, Vannasing P, Tremblay E, Lepore F, McKerral M, Lassonde M, et al. Visual development and neuropsychological profile in preterm children from 6 months to school age. J Child Neurol. 2015;30(9):1159–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tremblay E, Vannasing P, Roy M-S, Lefebvre F, Kombate D, Lassonde M, et al. Delayed early primary visual pathway development in premature infants: high density electrophysiological evidence. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e107992.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wachman EM, Lahav A. The effects of noise on preterm infants in the NICU. Archiv Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(4):F305–9.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Caldas IFR, Garotti MF, Shiramizu VKM, Pereira A. The socio-communicative development of preterm infants is resistant to the negative effects of parity on maternal responsiveness. Front Psychol. 2018;2(9):43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Financial support for this work was provided by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) of the Ministry of Education of Brazil.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SB, AP designed the experiments; HGC, ASN, BKC, KA, SB, AP collected data; HGC, ASN, BKC, KA, SB, AP analyzed data; HGC, SB, AP wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Pereira Jr..

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (#340.110) and written informed parental consent was obtained on behalf of all participants.

Consent to publish

All authors consent to the publication of the manuscript in BMC Research Notes.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavalcanti, H.G., da Silva Nunes, A.D., da Cunha, B.K.S. et al. Early exposure to environment sounds and the development of cortical auditory evoked potentials of preterm infants during the first 3 months of life. BMC Res Notes 13, 303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05129-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Preterm
  • Newborn
  • Brain development
  • Auditory
  • Cortex