Skip to main content

Internal consistency and correlation of the adverse childhood experiences, bully victimization, self-esteem, resilience, and social support scales in Nigerian children

Abstract

Objectives

We evaluated the internal consistencies and the correlation between measures of adverse childhood experiences (ACE), bully victimization, self-esteem, resilience, and social support in children/adolescents in Nigeria.

Results

The Cronbach’s alphas were 0.67 for the ACE Questionnaire; 0.79 for the victimization subscale of the Illinois Bully Scale; 0.60 for Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale; 0.81 for Connor–Davidson resilience scale; and 0.93 for multidimensional perceived social support scale. Social support was negatively correlated with ACE (r = − 0.21) and bully victimization (r = − 0.16) and was associated with higher self-esteem (r = − 0.29) and higher resilience (r = 0.15). Likewise, higher resilience was associated with fewer ACE (r = − 0.07), higher self-esteem (r = − 0.21), and higher bully victimization (r = 0.13). Higher self-esteem was associated with fewer ACE (r = 0.25) and lower bully victimization (r = 0.16), whereas bully victimization was positively correlated with ACE (r = 0.20). The correlations were all statistically significant.

Introduction

Poor mental health is a major health problem affecting children and adolescents globally. Mental health disorders have great impact on children ages 5 to 14 years in North America and Europe, and they are a growing problem in other regions of the world due to the complex change in patterns of health and disease and the interaction with demographic, economic, and sociologic determinants [1].

Factors that affect children’s and adolescents’ mental health include adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and bully victimization. ACE include physical or sexual abuse; domestic violence; exposure to violence in the community; neglect; the absence or limited availability of a caregiver; poverty; and food insecurity [2]. These experiences affect emotional expression and increase the use of maladaptive emotion-regulation strategies [3, 4]. These coping measures can result in psychopathology such as depression, anxiety, aggressive behavior, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance abuse [5,6,7]. Children and adolescents who experience bully victimization may face these mental health challenges also in adult life [8,9,10,11].

Factors that protect against mental health problems include self-esteem, resilience, and social support. Self-esteem is the ability to hold a favorable attitude towards one’s self. High self-esteem is associated with fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression [12]. Resilience, which is the ability to positively adapt to adversity, is associated with good mental health [13,14,15]. Also, previous studies showed that the support that individuals perceive they get through social interactions moderates the impact of ACE and bully victimization through a buffering effect that reduces psychological distress when stressful situations develop [12, 16, 17].

Though the impact of ACE, bully victimization, self-esteem, resilience and social support on mental health is assumed to be a global phenomenon [18], the interactions between these variables may vary with culture (beliefs, norms and values) [19]. Most of the studies on ACE, bully victimization, self-esteem, resilience, social support, and mental health have been conducted in Western countries, which are generally individualistic societies and differ in many ways from the collectivist societies of Africa [20].

ACE, bully victimization, and adolescents’ concern with self-esteem are also problems in Nigeria [21,22,23,24], and mental health difficulties are a growing problem among adolescents in the country [25]. It is important to conduct more studies, using validated tools, to elucidate the correlations between variables associated with mental health problems in settings and adolescent populations in Nigeria. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the internal consistency of tools used to measure ACE, bully victimization, self-esteem, resilience, and social support in a population of in-school children and adolescents in sub-urban Nigeria. We also determined how the constructs correlated with one another. We hypothesized that ACE and bully victimization would be associated negatively with social support, resilience, and self-esteem.

Main texts

Data were collected as part of a cross-sectional study that determined the association between caries and nutritional status in 6–16-year-old children attending private and public primary and secondary schools in Ife Central Local Government Area, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Data were collected from October to December 2019. Children at least 6-year old were recruited to ensure they had the cognitive ability to respond to the interviewer-administered questionnaire [26, 27]. Recruiting children 6–10-year-old for study participation further reduces the risk for recall bias, a major challenge when studying the impact of ACE and bullying in older individuals [28]. Children and adolescents with special health-care needs, those who were ill, and those who had fasted within 3 months before data collection, were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling procedure

The sample size for the primary study was 1209. Post-hoc power analyses using the formula by Metcalfe [29] indicated a power of 80% given a population prevalence rate of 13.9% for caries in children [30]. The sample was collected through a multi-stage cluster sampling technique that recruited 6–10-year-old children from primary schools, and 11–16-year-old children from secondary schools. Twenty primary schools (3 public, 17 private) and 10 secondary schools (2 public, 8 private) were randomly selected from the list of schools in the local government based on the ratio of public/private primary and public/private secondary schools. Data were collected from pupils using tools written in English and administered by interviewers; English is the language of instruction in schools in Nigeria.

Adverse childhood experiences were measured with the 10-item ACE Questionnaire, which provides a measure of cumulative life stress experienced during childhood [31]. The response to each of the 10 questions is either ‘yes’ or ‘no,’ with possible scores of 0 to 10. The higher the score the more adverse experiences the child has faced. Although the instrument had not been validated for use in Nigeria, validation in other countries indicated that it had good psychometric properties, with high correlation between mental and physical health measures and childhood trauma inventories [32].

Childhood bully victimization was assessed with the victimization subscale of the Illinois Bully Scale [33]. The subscale consists of four questions that measure both physical and verbal victimization that individuals experience from or by peers. The responses to each question ranged from never (scored 0) to 1–2 times (1), 3–4 times (2), 5–6 times (3), and 7 or more times (4). The responses were summed to derive a total score that ranged from 0 to 16. The verbal bullying, physical bullying, and bully victimization subscales of the Illinois Bully Scale were validated among 394 pupils in two secondary school in semi-urban southeast Nigeria. The Cronbach’s alphas for the whole scale and the victimization subscale were 0.84 and 0.78, respectively [17].

Self-esteem was assessed with the 10-item Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale that evaluated whether respondents’ perceptions of themselves were positive or negative. Items were scored on a Likert-like scale with options ranging from “Strongly Disagree” (1 point), “Disagree” (2 points), “Agree” (3 points) to “Strongly Agree” (4 points). The total score ranged from 10 to 40. Five item scores were reversed so that higher scores of all items in the scale indicated lower self-esteem. The scale had good psychometric properties [34] and was validated among 300 male and female senior secondary adolescents randomly selected from 15 secondary schools in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. The test–retest reliability score ranged from 0.85 to 0.88 [35], but no Cronbach’s alpha score had been previously reported among Nigerian children and adolescents.

Resilience was assessed with the 10-item Connor–Davidson resilience scale with each item rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (‘not true at all’) to 4 (‘true nearly all the time’). Possible total scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher resilience [36]. The scale had good psychometric properties for use in various cultures [37, 38]. It was validated with nursing students in Nigeria, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81 [39], but it has not been previously used among Nigerian children and adolescents.

Social support was assessed with the 12-item multi-dimensional perceived social support scale [40]. The scale has three subscales that assess an individual’s perception of the adequacy of their support from family, friends, and significant others. Each subscale comprises four questions. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-like scale ranging from 1—“very strongly agree” to 7—“very strongly disagree.” The possible total scores range from 12 to 84, with higher total scores corresponding to higher levels of perceived social support and lower scores corresponding to perceived unavailability or lack of social support. The scale had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80 when administered to secondary school students in semi-urban Southeast Nigeria [17]; a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.78 when administered to stroke survivors attending rehabilitation services in Kano, Northern Nigeria [41]; and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.67 when administered to Orthopaedic patients in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria [42].

Data analysis

The internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s alpha for the 10-item ACE Questionnaire, victimization subscale of the Illinois Bully Scale, 10-item Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale, 10-item Connor–Davidson resilience scale, and the 12-item multidimensional perceived social support scale. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to determine correlations among the scales. Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata/SE 14.0 for Windows (2015) and significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The study population consisted of 1001 pupils, of which 549 (54.8%) were girls and 962 (96.1%) were 11–16 years old. The mean (standard deviation-SD) age was 13.4 (1.77) years. Cronbach’s alphas were 0.67 (95% CI 0.64, 0.70) for the ACE Questionnaire; 0.79 (95% CI 0.77, 0.81) for the victimization subscale of the Illinois Bully Scale; 0.60 (95% CI 0.56, 0.64) for the 10-item Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale; 0.81 (95% CI 0.79, 0.83) for the 10-item Connor–Davidson resilience scale; and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92, 0.94) for the 12-item multi-dimensional perceived social support scale.

Table 1 shows the correlation between the psychosocial factors. All the factors had low but statistically significant correlations with one another. The directions of these correlations differed, however: The direction of the correlation between social support and ACE and bully victimization were inverse; the higher the perceived social support, the lower the number of ACE (r = − 0.21), and the lower the bully victimization (r = − 0.16). In contrast, the higher the social support, the higher the self-esteem (r = − 0.29) and the higher the resilience (r = 0.15).

Table 1 Correlation between the psychosocial variables

Higher resilience was significantly associated with fewer ACE (r = − 0.07), higher self-esteem (r = − 0.21) and higher bully victimization (r = 0.13). Self-esteem were significantly and directly correlated with the number of ACE and with bully victimization: self-esteem was lower among participants with more ACE (r = 0.25) and those with higher bully victimization (r = 0.16). Similarly, bully victimization significantly increased as the number of ACE increased (r = 0.20).

Cronbach’s alphas for the victimization subscale of the Illinois Bully Scale, the 10-item Connor–Davidson resilience scale, and the 12-item multidimensional perceived social support scale were high and compared well with values previously obtained in Nigeria, despite being administered to a more diverse population than our current study population [39, 41, 42]. This similarity suggests that the internal consistency of these instruments is stable across various populations. The Cronbach’s alpha values for the ACE questionnaire and the 10-item Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale were moderate. These estimates from the present study are the first Cronbach’s alpha values for these instruments to be reported among children and adolescents in Nigeria.

There were significant relationships between the study variables as predicted by our hypothesis, though bully victimization correlated positively with resilience. Though it has been suggested that low levels of stress can trigger adaptive coping strategies, which may increase resilience [43], the study finding of a positive correlation between bully victimization and resilience needs to be specifically tested.

In contrast, the negative association between resilience and ACE suggests different mechanisms of protection conferred by resilience for different childhood experiences. Considering the positive associations between resilience, self-esteem and social support found in the present study, it is also possible that resilience and social support together minimize the adverse impacts of stresses in children and adolescents. However, these protective effects may be stronger for bully victimization while the adverse impacts of ACE on children and adolescents’ resilience may be relatively more severe. For example, children may feel less threatened by bullying from their peers compared to maltreatment from older adults, over which they may have less control, but this possibility needs to be explored. The association between low social support and increased bully victimization suggests that the isolation associated with lower social support [44] may make affected children targets for bully victimization. It is important, however, to interpret these findings cautiously as this was a cross-sectional study.

Self-esteem score directly correlated with ACE and bully victimization indicating a negative relationship in view of the reverse scoring system for self-esteem: children exposed to more ACE and bully victimization had lower self-esteem than did others not exposed or exposed less to ACE and bully victimization. This finding corroborates past observations [45] and raises concern about the mental health problems of those exposed to ACE and bully victimization. Possible mental health problems resulting from low self-esteem include problems with friendships and romantic relationships, impaired academic and job performance, and increased vulnerability to drug and alcohol abuse [46]. Harnessing the potential of the social support systems in these communities to ameliorate the impact of ACE and bully victimization is as important as instituting efforts to reduce children’s experiences of these events.

Limitations

The ACE Questionnaire and the 10-item Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale had moderate internal consistency, so they may require modification or cultural adaptation to improve their Cronbach’s alpha scores. In addition, though the Cronbach’s alpha provides an estimate of internal consistency, it does not provide an exhaustive indication of a measure’s psychometric properties [47]. However, considering that the assessed constructs are relevant for health research and policy development, our findings offer preliminary evidence of acceptable reliability, which can be investigated in future studies. Furthermore, the instruments need to be translated into the main languages used in Nigeria to make them more useable among non-literate Nigerians.

Availability of data and materials

The data for the study have all been reported in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ACE:

Adverse childhood experiences

References

  1. 1.

    Baranne ML, Falissard B. Global burden of mental disorders among children aged 5–14 years. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2018;12(12):19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197:378–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McLaughlin KA, Hatzenbuehler ML. Mechanisms linking stressful life events and mental health problems in a prospective, community-based sample of adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:153–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McLaughlin KA, Hatzenbuehler ML, Hilt LM. Emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking peer victimization to the development of internalizing symptoms among youth. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77:894–904.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky A, Kessler RC. Childhood adversities and first onset of psychiatric disorders in a national sample of adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:1151–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Hill E, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky A, Kessler RC. Trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in a US national sample of adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52:815–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Carliner H, Keyes KM, McLaughlin KA, Meyers JL, Dunn EC, Martins SS. Childhood trauma and illicit drug use in adolescence: a population-based National Comorbidity Survey Replication-Adolescent Supplement study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55:701–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Klomek AB, Sourander A, Niemelä S, Kumpulainen K, Piha J, Tamminen T, et al. Childhood bullying behaviors as a risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides: a population-based birth cohort study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48:254–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Copeland WE, Wolke D, Angold A, Costello EJ. Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:419–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sourander A, Rönning J, Brunstein-Klomek A, Gyllenberg D, Kumpulainen K, Niemelä S, et al. Childhood bullying behavior and later psychiatric hospital and psychopharmacologic treatment: findings from the Finnish 1981 birth cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:1005–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Henriksen IO, Ranøyen I, Indredavik MS, Stenseng F. The role of self-esteem in the development of psychiatric problems: a three-year prospective study in a clinical sample of adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017;11:68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Arseneault L. The long-term impact of bullying victimization on mental health. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):27–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee JH, Nam SK, Kim AR, et al. Resilience: a meta-analytic approach. J Couns Dev. 2013;91:269–79.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Johnston MC, Porteous T, Crilly MA, et al. Physical disease and resilient outcomes: a systematic review of resilience definitions and study methods. Psychosomatics. 2015;56:168–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hu T, Zhang D, Wang J. A meta-analysis of the trait resilience and mental health. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;76:18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Brummett BH, Mark DB, Siegler IC, Williams RB, Babyak MA, Clapp-Channing NE, Barefoot JC. Perceived social support as a predictor of mortality in coronary patients: effects of smoking, sedentary behavior, and depressive symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(1):40–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Eze JE, Chukwuorji JC, Ettu PC, Zacchaeus EA, Iorfa SK, Nwonyi SK. Bullying and suicide ideation: testing the buffering hypothesis of social support in a sub-Saharan African sample. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-019-00294-w(Online ahead of print).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    McLaughlin K. The long shadow of adverse childhood experiences. Psychological Science Agenda | April 2017. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2017/04/adverse-childhood. Accessed 14 Apr 2020.

  19. 19.

    Department of Health and Human Services, US Public Health Service. Chapter 2 Culture Counts: The Influence of Culture and Society on Mental Health. In: Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity: a Supplement to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. 2001.

  20. 20.

    Yetim U. The impacts of individualism/collectivism, self-esteem, and feeling of Mastery on Life Satisfaction among the Turkish University students and academicians. Soc Indic Res. 2003;61:297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Oladeji BD, Makanjuola VA, Gureje O. Family-related adverse childhood experiences as risk factors for psychiatric disorders in Nigeria. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(3):186–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fenny O, Falola MI. Prevalence and correlates of bullying behavior among Nigerian middle school students. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020;64(5):564–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Akanni OO, Olashore AA, Osasona SO, Uwadiae E. Predictors of bullying reported by perpetrators in a sample of senior school students in Benin City, Nigeria. S Afr J Psychiatr. 2020;26:1359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chinawa JM, Obu HA, Manyike PC, Obi IE, Isreal OO, Chinawa AT. Self esteem among adolescents in Nigerian secondary schools: a neglected issue. J Adv Med Med Res. 2014;5(1):98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Aluh DO, Anyachebelu OC, Anosike C, Anizoba EL. Mental health literacy: what do Nigerian adolescents know about depression? Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018;12:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0186-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chambers CT, Johnston C. Developmental differences in children’s use of rating scales. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27(1):27–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Harter S, Whitesell NR. Developmental changes in children’s understanding of single, multiple, and blended emotion concepts. In: Saarni C, Harris PL, editors. Children’s understanding of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p. 81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Crouch E, Probst JC, Radcliff E, Bennett KJ, McKinney SH. Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among US children. Child Abuse Negl. 2019;92:209–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Metcalfe C. Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 7th edition. Wayne W. Daniel, Wiley. Stat Med. 2001; 20(2):324-326.

  30. 30.

    Adekoya-Sofowora C, Nasir W, Oginni A, et al. Dental caries in 12-year-old suburban Nigerian school children. Afr Health Sci. 2006;6(3):145–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wingenfeld K, Schäfer I, Terfehr K, Grabski H, Driessen M, Grabe H, et al. The reliable, valid and economic assessment of early traumatization: first psychometric characteristics of the German version of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACE). Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2011;61(1):e10–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Espelage DL, Holt M. Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: peer influences and psychosocial correlates. J Emot Abus. 2001;2:123–42.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Okoiye OE, Anyaochi NN, Onah AT. Moderating effect of cyberbullying on the psychological well-being of in-school adolescents in Benin Edo State Nigeria. Eur J Sustain Dev. 2015;4(1):109–18.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Campbell-Sills L, Stein MB. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress. 2007;20(6):1019–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Notario-Pacheco B, Solera-Martínez M, Serrano-Parra MD, Bartolomé-Gutiérrez R, García-Campayo J, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item CD-RISC) in young adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wang L, Shi Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese earthquake victims. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010;64(5):499–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Aloba O, Olabisi O, Aloba T. The 10-Item Connor–Davidson resilience scale: factorial structure, reliability, validity, and correlates among student nurses in Southwestern Nigeria. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2016;22(1):43–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Gordon K. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52:30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mohammad AH, Al Sadat N, Yim LS, Chinna K. Validity and Reliability of the Hausa version of multidimensional scale of perceived social support index. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(2):e18776.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ifeagwazi CM, Obi NG, Udensi CE, Chukwuorji JC. Influence of perceived injustice, social support and gender on depressive symptoms among orthopaedic patients. Eur J Sci Res. 2014;125(3):370–83.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Amer J Orthopsychiat. 1987;57(3):316–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tomaka J, Thompson S, Palacios R. The relation of social isolation, loneliness, and social support to disease outcomes among the elderly. J Aging Health. 2006;18(3):359–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264305280993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khodabandeh F, Khalilzadeh M, Hemati Z. The impact of adverse childhood experiences on adulthood aggression and self-esteem-a study on male forensic clients. Nov Biomed. 2018;2:85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mann M, Hosman CM, Schaalma HP, de Vries NK. Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(4):357–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sijtsma K. On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):107–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contributions of the study participants who took the time to respond to questions.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MOF designed the study. OA collected the data. MOF, OO designed the data analysis plan. MOF developed the first draft of the manuscript. MOF, OA, OO and MET contributed to the development of the full manuscript and agreed to the final version of the manuscript and its submission for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria (ERC/2018/08/06). The study was conducted in line with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. The primary study received written consent from the parents of all study participants. Written assent was obtained from children ages 12–16 years in addition to the parental consent.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MOF is a Sectional Editor with the BMC Oral Health. MET is an Associate Editor with the BMC Oral Health. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Folayan, M.O., Oginni, O., Arowolo, O. et al. Internal consistency and correlation of the adverse childhood experiences, bully victimization, self-esteem, resilience, and social support scales in Nigerian children. BMC Res Notes 13, 331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05174-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mental health
  • Internal consistency
  • Adverse childhood experiences
  • Bully victimization
  • Self-esteem
  • Resilience
  • Social support
  • Psychometric scales
  • Children
  • Adolescents
  • Nigeria