Skip to main content

Rapid and easy-to-use ES cell manipulation device with a small groove near culturing wells

Abstract

Objective

Production of genetically modified mice including Knock-out (KO) or Knock-in (KI) mice is necessary for organism-level phenotype analysis. Embryonic stem cell (ESC)-based technologies can produce many genetically modified mice with less time without crossing. However, a complicated manual operation is required to increase the number of ESC colonies. Here, the objective of this study was to design and demonstrate a new device to easily find colonies and carry them to microwells.

Results

We developed a polydimethylsiloxane-based device for easy manipulation and isolation of ESC colonies. By introducing ESC colonies into the groove placed near culturing microwells, users can easily find, pick up and carry ESC colonies to microwells. By hydrophilic treatment using bovine serum albumin, 2-μL droplets including colonies reached the microwell bottom. Operation time using this device was shortened for both beginners (2.3-fold) and experts (1.5-fold) compared to the conventional colony picking operation. Isolated ESC colonies were confirmed to have maintained pluripotency. This device is expected to promote research by shortening the isolation procedure for ESC colonies or other large cells (e.g. eggs or embryos) and shortening training time for beginners as a simple sorter.

Introduction

Genetically modified mice including Knock-out (KO) or Knock-in (KI) mice are necessary for organism-level phenotype analysis. To analyze organism-level phenotype formed from complex molecular/cellular networks, preparing many types of genetically modified mice is necessary. However, their production requires tremendous time and space. Development of simple and easy methods are desirable.

One reason for low-throughput is complicated crossing process taking several months/year. Repeated backcrosses are needed to obtain complete KO/KI homozygotes. To allow completion of KO/KI mouse production and phenotyping analysis within F0 generation, next-generation mammalian genetics without crossing was proposed [1, 2]. The process introduces designed mutation into the genomic DNA of mammalian zygotes or embryonic stem cells (ESCs) using site-specific endonucleases including a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 system [3]. Introduction of triple-target CRISPR into zygotes efficiently generates whole-body bi-allelic KO mice with almost 100% probability [4]. However, KI efficiency is still not high enough without crossing [5]. F0 mice obtained by KI into zygotes are often mosaic. By contrast, genome-editing methods were also applied to ESCs to generate KI ESCs with high efficiency [6]. Moreover, 3i-medium-cultivated KI ESCs injected into 8-cell stage embryos or aggregated with 8-cell stage embryonic cells can generate completely ESC-derived KI mice [6,7,8]. Thus, ESC-based methods produce KI mice without crossing.

However, ESC-based methods still have issues. Many colonies are necessary to be analyzed genetically, which needs colony picking operation requiring special skills: first, finding colonies on the dish bottom and, second, bringing single colonies carefully to each microwell. Reducing complicated manual handling is important. Recently, we established a protocol manipulating ESC colonies using a conventional cell-sorting machine [6]. However, it is expensive, large, and difficult be introduced into all biological laboratories. “User-friendly” concept is necessary such as what we demonstrated for cell patterning [9, 10] or manipulation [8, 11].

Here, we designed a new device to easily find colonies and carry them to microwells (Fig. 1). By a groove in the device center, introduced colonies are aligned in the groove bottom, which can be easily found. Also, microwells are placed near the groove to easily carry cells from the groove to wells. In this study, we fabricated the device and demonstrated faster operation time compared with conventional colony picking.

Fig. 1
figure1

Concept of the device. a 3D view of the device with a groove and microwells near it. b Illustration comparing the method using the device compared with the conventional method. c Design of the device indicating the dimensions

Main text

Methods

More detailed procedures and information of procurement are described in Additional file 1.

Device fabrication

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used due to its biocompatibility and easily molded property [12]. Based on design data prepared with computer-aided design software, an aluminum mold was made by a metalworking company. PDMS pre-polymer and a curing agent were mixed (10:1), poured into the mold, cured at 70 °C for 3 h and peeled off.

Surface treatment

For fluorosilane treatment, each well was filled with fluorine coating reagent containing poly-fluorosilane. It was promptly discarded, and the device was dried at 70 °C for 1 h. For bovine serum albumin (BSA) treatment, each well was filled with 1% BSA water solution and removed after 30 min.

Bead sliding down measurement

Four kinds of heights (1, 2, 3, and 4 mm) at 4-mm distant point from support contact position of a glass plate were set. 2-μL suspension (50 beads/μL) of 45-μm beads was placed on the point. After 30 s, the plate was positioned horizontally and air-dried. Bead number at each position was counted using a microscope.

Preparation and isolation of ESC colonies

ESC colonies were prepared as follows [6]. C57BL/6 (B6) ESCs were seeded (1 × 105 cells) in amine-coated 6-well plates, and cultivated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 under humidified conditions with 3i culture medium. After 3 days, ESC colonies were isolated. In conventional method, a single colony selected under the microscope was sucked with a pipette and transferred to a 96-well plate. When using the ESC manipulation device, colonies were detached from a plate by gentle pipetting and dispersed in the device groove. A single colony in the groove was selected under the microscope, sucked up with a pipette, and directly dispensed into a well of the device.

Production of ESC-derived mice (ES-mice)

ES-mice were produced as described previously [6]. B6 ESC single colony separated from the ESC manipulation device was expanded and cultivated in an amine-coated 6-well plate. The expanded colonies were trypsinized and dissociated into single cells. 10–30 ESCs were injected into each ICR 8-cell-stage embryo, and the embryos were transferred into the uteri of a pseudopregnant ICR female mouse. Contribution of ESCs in a chimeric mouse was determined by its coat color. All the animals used to produce the results shown in this article were sedated with carbon dioxide, then euthanized by cervical dislocation.

Results

Results of device fabrication and groove width optimization

The well shape, groove width and depth were considered for designing the device. The well bottom was designed as a cone so that the ESC colony would slide down to the center of this bottom. The well spacing of the device was adjusted to the well spacing of a 96-well plate so that multichannel pipettes could be used. In addition, the well was designed to be elliptical to have sufficient volume for injecting post-processing solutions.

Three devices with a groove width (1, 2, and 4 mm) were manufactured. Colonies were dispersed in each groove and observed under the microscope. When the groove width was 2 mm, colonies were arranged in a line at the groove bottom. When the width was 4 mm, colonies were scattered at the bottom (Additional file 2: Fig. S1a). When the width was 1 mm, transferring colonies from the groove to well was difficult. Therefore, optimum width was 2 mm. The groove depth was designed to be same as the well depth to observe both bottoms of the groove and well in same field of view under a microscope (Additional file 2: Fig. S1b). The aluminum mold was made accordingly, and the device was made as designed (Additional file 2: Fig. S1c).

Validation of surface treatment

When transferring colonies from the groove to well during observation under the microscope, dispensing the droplet directly on the well bottom is difficult because the pipette hits the microscope lens. However, dispensing the droplet after moving ESC colony manipulation device from the microscope stage takes time. These problems can be solved by tilting the pipette and letting the droplet slide down the wall surface of the well to the bottom by surface treatment effect. An ESC colony contained drop contacted into the well wall can be slid down to the bottom quickly. Therefore, further time reduction is expected (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure2

| Investigation of well surface treatment. a Illustration related to modifying the well surface to disperse droplets to the well bottom. b-d Photos showing the well with a droplet on the wall for three kinds of treated surfaces: (b) bare polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), c fluorosilane-treated, and d 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-treated. e Time dependency of contact angles of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-treated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces with control data for a bare PDMS surface

Medium droplets (1-10 μL, 1-μL steps) were dispensed on the well walls of untreated, fluorosilane-treated, and BSA-treated devices (Fig. 2b–d), indicating that when 2 μL or more volumes were dispensed, they slid down the BSA-treated wall to the bottom easily.

Investigation of duration of BSA treatment effect

Duration of BSA treatment effect was measured. PDMS sheets were immersed in 1% BSA solution, and blown off with an air-gun after 30 min. After 5, 10, 30, and 60 min, water contact angle was measured with a contact angle meter (DMs-401, Kyowa Interface Science, Japan) (Fig. 2e). The contact angle gradually increased with time after BSA treatment, but similar within 10 min, indicating that BSA treatment should be just before use.

Measurement of the bead sliding down effect due to the well wall slope

Although droplets slid down to the well bottom when the surface was BSA-treated, a colony contained in droplet might remain on the well wall surface. Therefore, we examined how beads actually slid down in various slope angles (Additional file 3: Fig. S2a). Beads clearly slid down when the slope angle was 45° or more (Additional file 3: Fig. S2c). Therefore, the colony would slide down to the bottom by dispensing the droplet on the well wall surface in the minor axis direction because the slope near the well bottom was 45° (Additional file 3: Fig. S2b). As Fig. S2d (Additional file 3), the colony slid down to the center of the bottom when culture medium containing the colony was dispensed.

Demonstration of shortened operation time using the device

An experienced operator (over 5 years’ experience) and a beginner (less than 1 years’ experience) transferred colonies 4 times each by conventional method and the device. Required time was measured (Fig. 3a, b). Actual operations by a beginner can be compared in Movie S1 (Additional file 4) (conventional method) and Movie S2 (Additional file 5) (using the device). The operation time became short by using the device for both the beginner (2.3-fold) and expert (1.5-fold). Especially for the beginner, time reduction was remarkable, and the beginner achieved operation time comparable to that of an expert.

Fig. 3
figure3

ESC manipulation device improves user operating time. a, b The operation time to pick up an ESC colony is indicated. Values are represented as mean and standard error; n = 4. a Results obtained by an experienced operator. b Results operated by a beginner. c A photo of ESC-derived mice (black ones) with recipient ICR mouse (white one)

Confirmation of producibility of ESC-derived mice (ES-mice)

In our method, ESC colonies were detached from a culture dish for single colony isolation. In such a situation, colonies might contact with each other and cross-contaminate in suspension. To validate the possibility of colony-to-colony cross-contamination, ESC colonies expressing reporter genes (EGFP or mKate2) were prepared and mixed into a suspension (Additional file 6: Figure S3a), and then isolated to single colonies with the ESC manipulation device. In the isolated 16 colonies, only one reporter gene, either EGFP or mKate, was expressed, and no double-positive colonies were detected (Additional file 6: Figure S3b). This result suggested that the cross-contamination in our method is a rare event, if any.

To examine the effect of the ESC colony manipulation device on the pluripotency of ESCs, the contribution of the isolated ESCs to chimeric mice was tested. The separated ESCs were injected into 8-cell embryos and transplanted into recipient ICR mice. As a result of transferring 93 early embryos injected with ESCs into 3 recipient ICR mice, we obtained 19 chimeric mice, and all of them are 100% ESC-contributed mice (ES-mice) (Fig. 3c). This result indicated that ESCs manipulated with our device maintained pluripotency.

Discussion

Simple and high-throughput cell-sorting systems were reported using microfluidic chips recently [13,14,15]. They separate cells without special detecting/sorting devices, however, they only treat small particles/cells under 20 μm due to the limit of microfluidic size capability. Generally, they cannot be applied for ESC colonies larger than 100 μm. Although droplet sorters [16, 17] sort relatively large size droplets, still cannot handle large colonies. Several 3D culture systems on-chips handling and analyzing colonies/spheroids were also reported [18,19,20,21], but cannot separate colonies.

Recently, we established a protocol manipulating ESC colonies using a state-of-the-art cell-sorting machine (without microfluidics), which is adaptable to large cells/colonies [6]. However, usually, cell-sorting machines are integrated systems of microfluidics, optical detection and information processing [22,23,24]. Such systems may be expensive/large, which are difficult to be introduced into biological laboratories. In contrast, our newly developed device can be introduced everywhere due to its low-cost and small installation space requirement. Our device requires no special skills/equipment, and can be utilized even by inexperienced persons. In addition, it can be applied flexibly for various types of large cells (e.g. eggs/embryos) without any readjustment, enabling quick, parallel sample preparation in developmental and cell biology experiments, including whole egg/embryo imaging or gene expression analyses.

Automation of biological experiments is a current topic of debate with respect to reproducibility and being labor-intensive processes [25, 26]. In mice production, an isolated colony must be separated into single cells and dispensed to a culture dish. These processes require much time and effort. Our new device was designed with 96-well plate format to be compatible with multichannel pipettes. In future, these downstream processes (separating, dispensing, and culturing) could be automated using commercially available liquid handling platforms including Biomek and epMotion. Such an approach reduces labor force and realize high-throughput mammalian genetics offering comprehensive understanding of gene functions involving various organism-level phenomena.

The developed device can be developed into a portable device that is combined with other on-chip devices. Together with other on-chip, miniaturized microfluidic devices including miniaturized pumps [27, 28] or valves [29,30,31], full automated colony picking operations without manual handling can be realized in future.

Limitations

This device can be alternative to cell-sorting machines, but generally applied to larger objects over 50 μm.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

KO:

Knock-out

KI:

Knock-in

ESC:

Embryonic stem cell

CRISPR:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat

PDMS:

Polydimethylsiloxane

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

ES-mice:

ESC-derived mice

References

  1. 1.

    Susaki EA, Ukai H, Ueda HR. Next-generation mammalian genetics toward organism-level systems biology. npj Systems Biology and Applications. 2017;3:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-017-0015-2.

  2. 2.

    Ukai H, Sumiyama K, Ueda HR. Next-generation human genetics for organism-level systems biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;58:137–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.03.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–23. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sunagawa GA, Sumiyama K, Ukai-Tadenuma M, Perrin D, Fujishima H, Ukai H, et al. Mammalian reverse genetics without crossing reveals Nr3a as a short-sleeper gene. Cell Rep. 2016;14:662–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.052.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yoshimi K, Kunihiro Y, Kaneko T, Nagahora H, Voigt B, Mashimo T. ssODN-mediated knock-in with CRISPR-Cas for large genomic regions in zygotes. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10431. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10431.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ukai H, Kiyonari H, Ueda HR. Production of knock-in mice in a single generation from embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2017;12:2513–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.110.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kiyonari H, Kaneko M, Abe S, Aizawa S. Three inhibitors of FGF receptor, ERK, and GSK3 establishes germline-competent embryonic stem cells of C57BL/6 N mouse strain with high efficiency and stability. Genesis. 2010;48:317–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20614.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sumiyama K, Matsumoto N, Garçon-Yoshida J, Ukai H, Ueda HR, Tanaka Y. Easy and efficient production of completely embryonic-stem-cell-derived mice using a micro-aggregation device. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0203056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203056.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Funano S-i, Tanaka N, Tanaka Y. User-friendly cell patterning methods using a polydimethylsiloxane mold with microchannels. Development, Growth & Differentiation. 2020;62:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12637.

  10. 10.

    Tanaka N, Moriguchi H, Sato A, Kawai T, Shimba K, Jimbo Y, Tanaka Y. Microcasting with agarose gel via degassed polydimethylsiloxane molds for repellency-guided cell patterning. RSC Adv. 2016;6:54754–62. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA11563B.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ota N, Yalikun Y, Tanaka N, Shen Y, Aishan Y, Nagahama Y, et al. Simple isolation of single cell: thin glass microfluidic device for observation of isolated single euglena gracilis cells. Anal Sci. 2019;35:577–83. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.18P568.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:550–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980316)37:5%3c550:AID-ANIE550%3e3.0.CO;2-G.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gou Y, Zhang S, Sun C, Wang P, You Z, Yalikun Y, et al. Sheathless inertial focusing chip combining a spiral channel with periodic expansion structures for efficient and stable particle sorting. Anal Chem. 2020;92:1833–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03692.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu Y, Ren D, Ling X, Liang W, Li J, You Z, et al. Time sequential single-cell patterning with high efficiency and high density. Sensors. 2018;18:3672. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113672.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tan W-H, Takeuchi S. A trap-and-release integrated microfluidic system for dynamic microarray applications. PNAS. 2007;104:1146–51. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606625104.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baret J-C, Miller OJ, Taly V, Ryckelynck M, El-Harrak A, Frenz L, et al. Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. Lab Chip. 2009;9:1850–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/b902504a.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mazutis L, Gilbert J, Ung WL, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD, Heyman JA. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:870–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.046.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Frey O, Misun PM, Fluri DA, Hengstler JG, Hierlemann A. Reconfigurable microfluidic hanging drop network for multi-tissue interaction and analysis. Nature Commun. 2014;5:4250. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5250.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hsiao AY, Torisawa YS, Tung YC, Sud S, Taichman RS, Pienta KJ, Takayama S. Microfluidic system for formation of PC-3 prostate cancer co-culture spheroids. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3020–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.047.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kwapiszewska K, Michalczuk A, Rybka M, Kwapiszewski R, Brzózka Z. A microfluidic-based platform for tumour spheroid culture, monitoring and drug screening. Lab Chip. 2014;14:2096–104. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00291a.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rismani YS, Shadmani A, Burgel SC, Misun PM, Hierlemann A, Frey O. Adding the ‘heart’ to hanging drop networks for microphysiological multi-tissue experiments. Lab Chip. 2015;15:4138–47. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc01000d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ren D, Xia Y, You Z. Multiplexed living cells stained with quantum dot bioprobes for multiplexed detection of single-cell array. J Biomed Optics. 2013;18:096005. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.9.096005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shen Y, Yalikun Y, Tanaka Y. Recent advances in microfluidic cell sorting systems. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2019;282:268–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.025.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Weaver WM, Tseng P, Kunze A, Masaeli M, Chung AJ, Dudani JS, et al. Advances in high-throughput single-cell microtechnologies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;25:114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hayden EC. The automated lab. Nature. 2014;516:131–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/516131a.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yachie N, Robotic Biology Consortium, Natsume T. Robotic crowd biology with Maholo LabDroids. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35:310–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3758.

  27. 27.

    Sasaki N, Shinjo M, Hirakawa S, Nishinaka M, Tanaka Y, Mawatari K, et al. A palmtop-sized microfluidic cell culture system driven by a miniaturized infusion pump. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:1729–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201100691.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tanaka Y, Noguchi Y, Yalikun Y, Kamamichi N. Earthworm muscle driven bio-micropump. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017;242:1186–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tanaka Y. Electric actuating valves incorporated into an all glass-based microchip exploiting the flexibility of ultra thin glass. RSC Adv. 2013;3:10213–20. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA41218K.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tanaka Y, Fujikawa T, Kazoe Y, Kitamori T. An active valve incorporated into a microchip using a high strain electroactive polymer. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2013;184:163–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.04.025.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yalikun Y, Tanaka Y. Large-scale integration of all-glass valves on a microfluidic device. Micromachines. 2016;7:83. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7050083.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their appreciation to Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), TEPCO Memprial Foundation, Japan, and the RIKEN BDR for funding the research.

Funding

This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (20H02596) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), TEPCO Memorial Foundation, Japan, and the RIKEN BDR organoid project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors designed the research; SF and YT researched the device fabrication; DT and HU researched the operation of ESC colonies and mice production; all authors analyzed the data; SF, DT, HU and YT prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yo Tanaka.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures regarding the animal experiment followed Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols of the University of Tokyo and received an approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Supplemental materials and methods.

Additional file 2:

Supplemental Fig. S1.

Additional file 3:

Supplemental Fig. S2.

Additional file 4:

Supplemental Movie S1.

Additional file 5:

Supplemental Movie S2.

Additional file 6:

Supplemental Fig. S3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Funano, S., Tone, D., Ukai, H. et al. Rapid and easy-to-use ES cell manipulation device with a small groove near culturing wells. BMC Res Notes 13, 453 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05294-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Colony
  • ES cell
  • Genome editing
  • Rapid manipulation