Skip to main content
Download PDF

Tenascin-C expression controls the maturation of articular cartilage in mice

BMC Research Notes volume 13, Article number: 78 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Expression of the de-adhesive extracellular matrix protein tenascin-C (TNC) is associated with the early postnatal development of articular cartilage which is both load-dependent and associated with chondrocyte differentiation. We assessed morphological changes in the articular cartilage of TNC deficient mice at postnatal ages of 1, 4 and 8 weeks compared to age-matched wildtype mice.

Results

Cartilage integrity was assessed based on hematoxylin and eosin stained-sections from the tibial bone using a modified Mankin score. Chondrocyte density and cartilage thickness were assessed morphometrically. TNC expression was localized based on immunostaining. At 8 weeks of age, the formed tangential/transitional zone of the articular cartilage was 27% thicker and the density of chondrocytes in the articular cartilage was 55% lower in wildtype than the TNC-deficient mice. TNC protein expression was associated with chondrocytes. No relevant changes were found in mice at 1 and 4 weeks of age. The findings indicate a role of tenascin-C in the post-natal maturation of the extracellular matrix in articular cartilage. This might be a compensatory mechanism to strengthen resilience against mechanical stress.

Introduction

Tenascin-C (TNC) is a hexameric glycoprotein of the extracellular matrix (ECM) that shapes mechanical and biochemical cues within the cellular microenvironment of various tissues by the modulation of cell adhesion [1]. TNC has a modular composition containing a heptad repeat region, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains, fibronectin-type III repeats, and a fibrinogen-like globe enabling alternatively spliced TNC isoforms to bind different ECM proteins, including syndecan, fibronectin and different integrins [1, 2] and subsequently modify the organization of the cytoskeleton and downstream signalling pathways via the dissolution of focal adhesions [3,4,5]. This de-adhesive action of TNC allows quiescent cells to enter an intermediate adhesive state that is compatible with tissue remodelling during morphogenesis, wound healing and oncogenic transformation [1, 3, 6, 7].

Expression of TNC is regulated by growth factor- and cytokine-activated signaling pathways [1, 8,9,10] and is subject to direct and indirect, damage-related regulation by mechanical stress in connective tissue cells [1, 11,12,13]. Enhanced TNC expression is especially implicated in the adaptive response of musculoskeletal tissues (i.e. skeletal muscle, tendon and bone) to mechanical stress [11,12,13,14,15], which governs the post-natal differentiation, and regenerative response subsequent to the impact of a mechanical challenge or insult, of this tissue family [14, 16,17,18,19].

Based on its particularly high abundance in the condensed mesenchyme, TNC has also been implicated in the differentiation of chondrocytes during cartilage maturation in the embryo before TNC expression in these cartilage anlagen is lost and chondrocytes produce cartilage-specific extracellular matrix proteins [20,21,22]. Later, up to 4 weeks postpartum TNC expression reappears in the peripheral perichondrium [21, 23] and remains expressed in articular cartilage, but not in the growth plate, and decreases thereafter [16, 20, 24]. Recently, TNC has been found to be re-expressed subsequent to traumatic joint loading of the developed articular cartilage and to promote cartilage repair via a switch in extracellular matter synthesis [25].

Although proposed [26], and suggested by TNC’s contribution to musculoskeletal remodelling [11,12,13,14,15] and load-dependent regenerative functional adaptations of joints after birth [27, 28]; it had never been tested experimentally whether TNC participates in articular chondrocyte development and differentiation in long bone models, and remains functional throughout postnatal life. We thus hypothesized that TNC-deficient mice would demonstrate structural aberrations of articular cartilage in the first 2 months after birth when knee joints are first subjected to gravitational loading and chondrocyte volume and extracellular matrix production undergo marked alterations [24].

Main text

Methods

Study design

TNC-deficient mice (TNC −/−) and homozygous wildtype mice (TNC +/+) were generated by the breeding of homozygous TNC-deficient mice, and homozygous wildtype mice, respectively. Mice were ear marked, genotyped within the first 2 weeks after birth and subsequently housed in groups of 2–6 animals per cage. The parental homozygous TNC-deficient mice and homozygous wildtype mice were derived from the breeding of heterozygous TNC-deficient mice (TNC +/+/). Skeletal tissue was collected from euthanized mice irrespective of sex, at 4 or 8 weeks of age and subjected to histological processing. The assessment of structural deficits (modified Mankin score, cell density in the articular cartilage, TNC expression in articular cartilage) was carried out in a blinded fashion.

Animals

TNC-deficient mice were derived from the original strain with a targeted insertion of a β-lactamase cassette in the NcoI site of exon 2 of the TNC gene [29] and back crossed with WT 129/SV mice. Mice were housed with 12:12-h light/dark cycle at a constant temperature of 22 °C in Macrolon type III cages (Indulab, Italy) under specific-pathogen-free conditions with standard chow and water ad libitum at the Department of Clinical Research, University of Berne, Switzerland. Animal health status was daily inspected and the microbiological status inspected in sentinels. Genotype was determined by PCR on tail DNA [14]. Tail cutting was done after euthanasia.

Sample preparation and histology

The mice were anaesthetized with 5% isoflurane (Provet AG, Burgdorf, Switzerland) and euthanized by decapitation. Skeletal elements of the explanted hindlimbs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and shipped to the University of Kentucky. The tissue was processed by decalcification as described [30, 31], embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm thickness in parallel direction to the tibial axes, and subjected to standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Slides representing the distal femur from the diaphysis (proximal) to the articular surface of the knee (distal) and the proximal tibia from the articular surface to the diaphysis were shipped to the University of Zurich for morphological analysis.

Assessment of structural cartilage deficits

H&E stained sections of the coronary tibia were recorded at a four- and tenfold magnification on an IX50 microscope via a DP72 digital camera (Olympus, Volketswil, Switzerland). A modified Mankin score was used to grade cartilage integrity from 0 to 7 points (i.e. normal structure to complete cartilaginous destruction) based on the staining of the cartilage structure and tidemark (Additional file 1: Figure S1, Additional file 2: Table S1; [32]). The employed scoring rubric has been shown to strongly correlate with the OARSI scoring [33] and has been used consistently in rodent [34, 35] and human specimens to grade mild to moderate cartilage defects [33]. Cell density within the articular cartilage was detected by point counting using a 25 by 25 µm grid that was placed on a randomly selected tenfold magnified microscopic field of each sample under application of the forbidden line rule. Thickness of the tangential/transitional zone of articular cartilage was determined from the average of three measurements for the tangential distance in the center of the joint with the cellSens software (version 1.6, Olympus, Volketswil, Switzerland).

Immunohistochemical detection of tenascin-C

Paraffin sections were processed essentially as described [36] but without preincubation with proteolytic enzymes. Deparaffinized sections were incubated with affinity purified TNC specific antibody from rabbit (#473, 1:100; [37]) or a negative control (rabbit antibody against serum response factor, [38]) and subsequently with horse radish peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibody [#55676 (1:200; MP Biomedicals, Ohio, USA)]. Signal was detected using AEC high sensitivity substrate (DAKO, Baar, Switzerland) and microscopically recorded.

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS by IBM (Armonk, NY, USA) for the statistical analysis and graphic representation of the data. A two-way ANOVA for the factors genotype and age followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis was performed, when equality of variance could be assumed based on a Levene’s test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Animals

All animals entering the experiment were free of signs of stress and had a proper microbiological status. No adverse events were noted.

Cartilage structure

Figure 1a shows the results of the assessment using the modified Mankin score. No difference revealed in dependence on genotype (F = 0.701, p = 0.412, η2 = 0.034), age (F = 1.223, p = 0.315, η2 = 0.109), and the interaction between genotype × age (F = 0.291, p = 0.751, η2 = 0.028) (Fig 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of age and genotype on articular cartilage. Box whisker plots visualizing the median (central line), 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and highest and lowest values (whiskers) for the modified Mankin scores (a) and cell density (b) in the articular cartilage of wildtype and TNC-deficient mice at 1, 4 and 8 weeks of age. n = 4 for all sample points, except for the 8 weeks of wildtype mice where n = 6. * and *** denote p < 0.05, and < 0.001, respectively, for the indicated difference

Full size image

Development of the tangential/transitional zone of articular cartilage was evident at 4 weeks of age in both wildtype and TNC-deficient mice. An effect of the genotype (F = 9.295, p = 0.010, η2 = 0.436) was determined for the thickness of the tangential/transitional zone of articular cartilage. However, thickness was not affected by age (F = 2.677, p = 0.128, η2 = 0.182) nor the interaction between genotype × age (F = 0.553, p = 0.471, η2 = 0.044). At 8 weeks of age the articular cartilage was thicker in wildtype than TNC-deficient mice (see Table 1).

Table 1 Thickness of the tangential/transitional articular cartilage
Full size table

Altered cell density in articular cartilage of tenascin-C deficient mice

Figure 1b summarizes the measured cell density in the different groups. For cell density in articular cartilage, there was a significant effect of genotype (F = 6.899, p = 0.016, η2 = 0.256) and age (F = 11.952, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.544), and a trend for an interaction effect of age × genotype (F = 3.494, p = 0.083, η2 = 0.200). Post hoc analysis localized a significant difference (p = 0.011) between the TNC-deficient (359.4 ± 54.5 cells/mm2) and wildtype (160.8 ± 44.5 cells/mm2) mice at 8 weeks of age. Cell density between TNC-deficient and wildtype mice at one (p = 0.229) and 4 weeks (p = 0.544) of age did not differ significantly. In TNC-deficient mice cell density was lower at eight than 1 week of age (− 178.8 cells/mm2, p = 0.031). In wildtype mice, cell density was lower at eight than 1 week of age (− 281.0 cells/mm2, p = 0.001) and 4 weeks of age (− 279.7 cells/mm2, p = 0.001). The diameter of the epiphysis demonstrated an effect of age (F = 54.156, p < 8.5 10−9, η2 = 0.844), but no effect of genotype (F = 0.004, p = 0.951, η2 = 0.001), increasing similarly between one and 4 weeks of age in both genotypes and then remained stable (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Localization of tenascin-C expression

Chondrocyte specific staining of TNC was identified in the tangential and transitional zone of the tibial cartilage in 4 and 8 weeks-old wildtype and TNC mice and in the bone marrow (Fig. 2; Additional file 4: Figure S3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tenascin-C expression in articular cartilage. TNC signal in a 4 and 8 weeks old wildtype mouse and an 8 weeks old TNC-deficient mouse. The detected signal after detection with TNC antibody was compared to a negative control. Arrowheads point to TNC positive staining in association with chondrocytes. Bar 200 μm

Full size image

Discussion

Our study has examined the articular cartilage of TNC-deficient mice at early age. The results indicate that TNC-deficient mice demonstrate alterations in the maturation of the tibial articular cartilage at 8 weeks of age that do not seem to manifest in a gross pathology according to Mankin scores under native conditions. Our data imply that the reduction in chondrocyte cell density that characterizes post-natal growth and maturation of skeletal development [24, 30, 39] is TNC-dependent.

Our immunohistochemical experiments localizing strong TNC expression to chondrocytes of the tangential/transitional zones of 4- and 8-weeks-old mice confirm the association of TNC expression with the periphery of developing cartilage [16, 36]. This result indicates that chondrocyte-related TNC expression and differences in the density of this cell type in articular cartilage 8 weeks into development are associated. TNC expression is abundant in the territorial matrix of cartilage [16, 36] suggesting its involvement in the genesis of articular chondroytes and assembly of the chondrocyte matrix [21, 36]. Our observations imply that TNC is part of the mechanism regulating the increase in volume of articular cartilage, and extracellular matrix production from birth to 2 months of age in mice, when overall cell density is decreased [24]. Effects of TNC-deficiency on the thickness of cell layers had been documented during healing of compressed corneas [40] and trauma induced extracellular matrix synthesis in articular cartilage [25, 36]. In this regard, the reduced thickness of articular cartilage in TNC-deficient mice at 8 weeks of age suggests a reduced capacity for extracellular matrix synthesis.

We observed that the tangential/transitional zone of articular cartilage was 30% thicker in wildtype than TNC-deficient mice at the age of 8 weeks when chondrocyte density in the wildtype mice was concurrently lower. The findings imply that the lower chondrocyte density in wildtype mice is in part explained by the enhanced deposition of extracellular matrix rather than a genotype effect on the proliferation or depletion of chondrocytes [41]. This contention is supported by the reciprocal relationship between the expression of TNC and cartilage-specific extracellular matrix proteins during chondrocyte differentiation [21], and between the cell density and thickness of articular cartilage [40]. Meanwhile, the decreased cell density in articular cartilage of wildtype mice between 4 and 8 weeks of age, when the thickness of articular cartilage was not significantly affected (12%, p = 0.124), suggests that cells were nevertheless lost during this phase of postnatal development; contributing via a reduction in the capacity for extracellular matrix synthesis [22], to the load-dependent thinning of articular cartilage during subsequent post-natal development [27].

We conclude that the morphological changes in the articular cartilage of TNC-deficient mice are subtle. They do not have a higher rate of growth abnormalities or structural defects; however, structural differences at 8 weeks of age are supportive of a TNC-dependent mechanism that leads to the deposition of the territorial matrix, rather than the down-regulation of chondrocyte density, in the 1 weeks after birth [19].

Limitations

Our histological assessment does with the exception of TNC expression only allow limited conclusions on the molecular pathways being implicated in the observed differences in post-natal development of articular cartilage. In this regard we also refer to the observation that the strain of TNC-deficient mice retains expression of an aberrant form of TNC that may lead to intracellular immunoreactivity [14, 42]; in line with the observed TNC staining in the cytoplasm of chondrocytes (Fig. 2). Moreover, we only observed a relatively small sample size of 26 animals during the first 8 weeks of life. This is possibly too short a time period to observe the TNC-dependent repair mechanisms [43], as cartilage repair is comparably slow and sub-optimal [26, 44].

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the Mendeley data repository, (https://data.mendeley.com/) under https://doi.org/10.17632/mt3txxw53g.1.

Abbreviations

Akt:

Protein kinase B

CREB:

cAMP-responsive element binding protein

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

MAP:

Mitogen activated protein

PDGF:

Platelet-derived growth factor

PI3K:

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

TGFβ:

Transforming growth factor beta

TNC:

Tenascin-C

WT:

Wildtype

References

  1. Midwood KS, Chiquet M, Tucker RP, Orend G. Tenascin-C at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:4321–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giblin SP, Midwood KS. Tenascin-C: form versus function. Cell Adh Migr. 2015;9(1–2):48–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy-Ullrich JE. The de-adhesive activity of matricellular proteins: is intermediate cell adhesion an adaptive state? J Clin Invest. 2001;107(7):785–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Midwood KS, Schwarzbauer JE. Tenascin-C modulates matrix contraction via focal adhesion kinase– and rho-mediated signaling pathways. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(10):3601–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Swindle CS, Tran KT, Johnson TD, Banerjee P, Mayes AM, Griffith L, et al. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats of human tenascin-C as ligands for EGF receptor. J Cell Biol. 1999;154(2):459–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ummarino D. Tenascin C perpetuates tissue fibrosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(7):375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oskarsson T, Padua D, Wang Q, Bos PD, Tavazoie SF, Alarco C, et al. Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2008;451:147–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Massague J, Wotton D. Transcriptional control by the TGF-b/Smad signaling system. EMBO J. 2000;19(8):1745–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiovaro F, Chiquet-Ehrismann R, Chiquet M. Transcriptional regulation of tenascin genes. Cell Adh Migr. 2015;9:1–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jinnin M, Ihn H, Asano Y, Yamane K, Trojanowska M, Tamaki K. Platelet derived growth factor induced tenascin-C transcription is phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-dependent and mediated by Ets family transcription factors. J Cell Physiol. 2006;206:718–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Järvinen TAH, Jozsa L, Kannus P, Järvinen TLN, Kvist M. Mechanical loading regulates tenascin-C expression in the osteotendinous junction. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:3157–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiquet-Ehrismann R, Chiquet M. Tenascins: regulation and putative functions during pathological stress. J Pathol. 2003;200:488–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flück M, Tunc-Civelek V, Chiquet M. Rapid and reciprocal regulation of tenascin-C and tenascin-Y expression by loading of skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(Pt 20):3583–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flück M, Mund SI, Schittny JC, Klossner S, Durieux A-C, Giraud M-N. Mechano-regulated tenascin-C orchestrates muscle repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(36):13662–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarvinen TA, Jozsa L, Kannus P, Jarvinen TL, Hurme T, Kvist M, Pelto-Huikko M, Kalimo H, Jarvinen M. Mechanical loading regulates the expression of tenascin-C in the myotendinous junction and tendon but does not induce de novo synthesis in the skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:857–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackie EJ, Ramsey S. Expression of tenascin in joint-associated tissues during development and postnatal growth. J Anat. 1996;188:157–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. The impact of loading, unloading, ageing and injury on the human tendon. J Physiol. 2019;597(5):1283–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frost HM. From Wolff’s law to the mechanostat: a new “face” of physiology. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3(5):282–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Webb CM, Zaman G, Mosley JR, Tucker RP, Lanyon LE, Mackie EJ. Expression of tenascin-C in bones responding to mechanical load. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(1):52–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pacifici M, Iwamoto M, Golden EB, Leatherman JL, Lee Y, Chuong C. Tenascin is associated with articular cartilage development. Dev Dyn. 1993;198:123–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pacifici M. Tenascin-C and the development of articular cartilage. Matrix Biol. 1994;14(689–98):42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Orozco GA, Tanska P, Florea C, Grodzinsky AJ, Korhonen RK. A novel mechanobiological model can predict how physiologically relevant dynamic loading causes proteoglycan loss in mechanically injured articular cartilage. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15599.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Edwall-Arvidsson C, Wroblewski J. Characterization of chondrogenesis in cells isolated from limb buds in mouse. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1996;193:453–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Decker RS. Articular cartilage and joint development from embryogenesis to adulthood. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;62:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsui Y, Hasegawa M, Iino T, Imanaka-Yoshida K, Yoshida T, Sudo A. Tenascin-c prevents articular cartilage degeneration in murine osteoarthritis models. Cartilage. 2018;9(1):80–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pacifici M. Tenascin-C and the development of articular cartilage. Matrix Biol. 1995;14(9):689–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brommer H, Brama PA, Laasanen MS, Helminen HJ, van Weeren PR, Jurvelin JS. Functional adaptation of articular cartilage from birth to maturity under the influence of loading: a biomechanical analysis. Equine Vet J. 2005;37(2):148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Namba RS, Meuli M, Sullivan KM, Le AX, Adzick NS. Spontaneous repair of superficial defects in articular cartilage in a fetal lamb model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(1):4–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Forsberg E, Hirsch E, Frohlich L, Meyer M, Ekblomi P, Aszodi A, et al. Skin wounds and severed nerves heal normally in mice lacking tenascin-C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(June):6594–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mienaltowski MJ, Huang L, Stromberg AJ, MacLeod JN. Differential gene expression associated with postnatal equine articular cartilage maturation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mienaltowski MJ, Huang L, Frisbie DD, Mcilwraith CW, Stromberg AJ, Bathke AC, et al. Transcriptional profiling differences for articular cartilage and repair tissue in equine joint surface lesions. BMC Med Genomics. 2009;2:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mankin HJ, Dorfman H, Lipiello Lous ZA. Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. J Bone Jt Surg. 1971;53(3):523–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pauli C, Whiteside R, Las Heras F, Nesic D, Koziol J, Grogan SP, Matyas J, Pritzker KPH, D’Lima DD, Lotz MK. Comparison of cartilage histopathology assessment systems on human knee joints at all stages or osteoarthritis development. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(6):476–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim JL, Moon CW, Son YS, Kim SJ. Combined effect of bilateral ovariectomy and anterior cruciate ligament transection with medial meniscectomy on the development of osteoarthritis model. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(4):583–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Eto S, Goto M, Soga M, Kaneko Y, Uehara Y, Mizuta H, Era T. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from human iPS cells via mesoderm and neuroepithelium have different features and therapeutic potentials. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pfander D, Heinz N, Rothe P, Carl H-D, Swoboda B. Tenascin and aggrecan expression by articular chondrocytes is influenced by interleukin 1b: a possible explanation for the changes in matrix synthesis during osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(3):240–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wehrle-Haller B, Chiquet M. Dual function of tenascin: simultaneous promotion of neurite growth and inhibition of glial migration. J Cell Sci. 1993;610:597–610.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Flück M, Carson JA, Schwartz RJ, Booth FW. SRF protein is upregulated during stretch-induced hypertrophy of rooster ALD muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(6):1793–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bobacz K, Erlacher L, Smolen J, Soleiman A, Graninger WB. Chondrocyte number and proteoglycan synthesis in the aging and osteoarthoritic human articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(12):1618–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kamisan N, Naveen SV, Ahmad RE, Kamarul T. Chondrocyte density, proteoglycan content and gene expressions from native cartilage are species specific and not dependent on cartilage thickness: a comparative analysis between rat, rabbit and goat. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schiller M, Javelaud D, Mauviel A. TGF-β-induced SMAD signaling and gene regulation: consequences for extracellular matrix remodeling and wound healing. J Dermatol Sci. 2004;35:83–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mackie EJ, Tucker RP. The tenascin-C knockout revisited. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:3847–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koyama Y, Kusubata M, Yoshiki A, Hiraiwa N, Ohashi T, Irie S, et al. Effect of tenascin-C deficiency on chemically induced dermatitis in the mouse. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111(6):930–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Savarese JJ, Erickson H, Scully SP. Articular chondrocyte tenascin-C production and assembly into de novo extracellular matrix. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:273–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sonja Mund, Ph.D., and Stephan Klossner, Ph.D., for technical assistance during breeding and genotyping of the mice, Mihoko Shimojo for the tissue processing, and Prof. Brigitte von Rechenberg, DVM ECVS, and Dr. Katja Nuss, DVM, for assistance in the assessment of Mankin scores.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant no. 112139) and the French dystrophy association (Grant no. F11878). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michael J. Mienaltowski

    Present address: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Muscle Plasticity, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist Campus, Lengghalde 5, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland

    Bastian L. Gruber, Stephanie Kasper & Martin Flück

  2. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Michael J. Mienaltowski & James N. MacLeod

  3. Institute of Anatomy, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

    Johannes Schittny & Martin Flück

Authors
  1. Bastian L. Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Mienaltowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James N. MacLeod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes Schittny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephanie Kasper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Martin Flück
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MF and JNM were responsible for the overall study design. Breeding was done by JS. Isolation of the knee joint was carried out by MF. Sectioning an H&E staining was done by MJM under supervision of JNM. BLG was responsible for the evaluation of the specimens. TNC staining was done by SK. Statistical analysis was done by MF and BLG. The manuscript was written by BLG and revised by MF. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Flück.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal experiments were performed according to the Swiss law of animal welfare (TSch455) and with approval of the Veterinary Office of the Canton of Berne, Switzerland (BE-88/05, BE-59/09) following the rules of ethics of the University of Berne.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Articular cartilage of a TNC deficient mouse at 8 week of age. The articular cartilage is divided into 4 zones as depicted. The tidemark lies between the radial and the calcified zone.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

List of the discriminative characteristics for the two considered structural aspects which respective points are summed to reveal the modified Mankin score.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Box Whisker plots visualizing the median (central line), 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and highest and lowest values (whiskers) for the diameter of the epiphysis in wildtype and TNC-deficient mice at 1, 4 and 8 week of age. n = 4 for all sample point, except for all sample points, except for the 8 week of wildtype mice where n = 6.***denotes p < 0.001 for the indicated difference.

Additional file 4: Figure S3.

Tenascin-C expression in articular cartilage. TNC signal in articular cartilage of an 8-week-old wildtype and TNC-deficient mouse. The detected signal was compared to a negative control. Arrowhead points to TNC positive staining in association with chondrocytes. Bar, 200 μm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruber, B.L., Mienaltowski, M.J., MacLeod, J.N. et al. Tenascin-C expression controls the maturation of articular cartilage in mice. BMC Res Notes 13, 78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4906-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4906-8

Keywords

  • Tenascin C
  • Knock-out mouse
  • Articular cartilage
  • Cell density
  • Cartilage defect
  • Load
  • Adhesion

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us