Methods
Plant materials and experimental design
Three representative liverworts, D. hirsuta, M. paleacea, and P. appendiculatum (Fig. 1), were collected from Shillong (Meghalaya), India, at a latitude of 25.5788°N and longitude of 91.8933°E. For sample collection, thalli were washed with distilled water to remove the soil and other impurities and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and brought to the laboratory.
We initiated this work by comparing three well known plant protein extraction buffers in D. hirsuta followed by protein precipitation in three different organic solvents. Once the protein extraction buffer and precipitation method was finalized, we performed 2-DE for D. hirsuta with certain modifications. Then, we applied the same protocol to two other liverworts namely M. paleacea, and P. appendiculatum. All experiments were conducted in triplicate (at both biological and technical level).
Selection of buffers, protein quantifications and SDS-PAGE
Three well-known plant protein extraction buffers, i.e., (i) 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl and 10% glycerol [19], (ii) 1.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.8) [20] and (iii) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) extraction buffer containing (0.2 M 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) pH 7.0, 5% PVPP, 1% triton X-100, 10% glycerol, and 2 mM DTT; [21], were tested for isolating the cytosolic proteins from three liverworts. Additional details on protein quantification and SDS-PAGE analysis are provided in Additional file 1.
Comparison of protein precipitation methods and optimization of 2-DE
As per the literature, three different methods of protein precipitations were tested in the case of D. hirsuta namely, ice-chilled 80% ethanol [22], 80% acetone [20], and TCA–acetone (with varied concentration of TCA, i.e., 10%, 15%, and 20%) [23]. Moreover, additional applications and comparison of these precipitation methods are described in Additional file 1. In addition to these steps regarding 2-DE optimisation, spot excision, in-gel tryptic digestion, and mass spectrometry of D. hirsuta are illustrated in Additional file 1.
Optimized method of 2-DE for D. hirsuta was applied in the remaining two liverworts
Once the 2-DE method was optimized for D. hirsuta, the same protocol was applied to M. paleacea and P. appendiculatum.
Results
In this study, three distinctive protein extraction buffers, i.e., 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 1.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.8), and PVPP-containing buffer, were evaluated in D. hirsuta in terms of protein yield and better resolution on SDS-PAGE. Among them, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) showed a high protein yield and better resolved SDS-PAGE (Additional file 2: Figures S1, S2). Furthermore, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) extracted proteins were subjected to three different protein precipitation method, i.e., 80% ethanol, 80% acetone, and 20% TCA–acetone. The result demonstrated that the 20% TCA–acetone precipitation method with slight modification such as concentration gradient acetone washing of protein samples, increase in incubation of protein pellets in the rehydration buffer, slight alteration in IEF program and a twofold increase in the SDS concentration and equilibration time, produced better results for the proteomic study, which is reflected in terms of more number of protein spots on 2-DE gels with lesser streaking and smearing on gel (Additional file 2: Figures S5, S6). The abovementioned results could be attributed to TCA effectively concentrating the proteins by removing a majority of secondary metabolites (phenolics, terpenoids, and pigments) from the precipitated proteins. The entire optimization process has been shown in the form of a flow chart (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we excised randomly selected spots from the 2-DE gel of D. hirsuta, which were successfully identified using mass spectrometry. The details of the above-mentioned results are provided in Additional file 2: Figures S1–10.
To confirm the applicability of this method, it was applied to another two selected liverworts in which well-resolved 2-DE gels were observed (Fig. 3).
Discussion
Liverworts produce a wide array of secondary metabolites; few of these compounds are unique to liverworts and have not been reported in any other plants, fungi, and marine organisms [15, 24]. During protein extraction, these secondary metabolites form very strong hydrogen bonds with proteins and build irreversible complexes that eventually result in the streaking and smearing of 2-DE gels [25]. Therefore, to obtain high-quality protein samples that can offer a satisfactory 2-DE gel, the removal of these interfering compounds are essential. Generally, two strategies are used to remove the interfering compounds from extracted proteins. In first strategy, contaminants are removed before protein extraction; however, in second strategy, removal is performed during and after protein extraction [5]. In this study, we focused on second strategy in which we compared three different protein extraction buffers, namely, 1.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.8), 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), and PVPP extraction buffer, in terms of both protein yield and better separation in SDS-PAGE of D. hirsuta. In this study, PVPP extraction buffer improved the protein yield in crude extract; however, after precipitation in 20% TCA–acetone, the amount of soluble protein was found to be lesser compared to 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) and 1.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.8) (Additional file 2: Figure S1A, B). After precipitation and resolubilization in the rehydration buffer, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) showed a higher protein yield among all tested buffers. Furthermore, the SDS-PAGE analysis showed a better band profile for proteins extracted using 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) compared to others. Based on these results, we concluded that the addition of PVPP neither improved the amount of protein in the precipitated samples of D. hirsuta nor showed better separation of proteins in SDS-PAGE; therefore, this procedure was eliminated from further study. Furthermore, similar results have been reported in case of mosses because PVPP addition did not improve the protein content and quality of gel [20]. The success of a simple but an efficient buffer, i.e., 50 mM Tris–HCl 7.5, can be probably attributed to it providing a very favourable condition for the solubility and stability of multiple proteins. Previously, this buffer has been used to obtain better quality of 2-DE gels in mosses [26].
After obtaining improved results for protein extraction in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) buffer, we focused on evaluating protein precipitation methods. We used three organic solvents for precipitation, namely, 80% ethanol, 80% acetone, and TCA–acetone (in the range of 10%, 15%, and 20% TCA). Note that protein pellets obtained using 20% TCA–acetone were creamy white in color and offered good quality of 2-DE gels in terms of lack of streaking, numbers, and distribution of spots and resolution of gels (Additional file 2: Figure S5 A–E). Furthermore, a creamy white color of protein pellet indicates that a high amount of TCA was very effective for removing a majority of secondary metabolites. Moreover, TCA–acetone precipitation was advantageous because it removed interfering compounds and simultaneously inactivated components involved in the degradation and modification of proteins such as proteases, phenoloxidases, and peroxidases [20, 23, 27]. There are reports of various types of plants in which TCA–acetone precipitation has been successfully used for protein precipitation followed by 2-DE [28,29,30]. However, few contaminants occasionally get co-precipitated with proteins, which affect both the quality and solubility of proteins. To eliminate these contaminants and increase the quality and solubility of proteins, we performed certain modifications, i.e. (i) sequential concentration gradient acetone washing of protein pellets, (ii) prolonged incubation of protein pellets in rehydration buffer, (iii) alteration in IEF program, (iv) two-fold increase in the SDS concentration in equilibration buffer, and (v) increase in SDS-equilibration time of IPG strips. Based on our results, these amendments facilitated non-protein contaminant removal and protein re-dissolution, which ultimately increased the number of protein spots, reduced the horizontal and vertical streaking, and enhanced the resolution of 2-DE gels in the case of D. hirsuta (Additional file 2: Figure S6). All protein spots selected for mass spectrometry resulted in successful identification, which indicates the compatibility of optimized method using mass spectrometry and its reliability for downstream processing. Furthermore, a similar protocol was successfully applied for the remaining two liverworts, namely, M. paleacea and P. appendiculatum, which was confirmed by better-resolved 2-DE gels (Fig. 3).
Currently, phenol-based methods have attracted considerable attention and are commonly used in plant proteomics. In this study, we attempted phenol-based protein extraction, followed by ammonium acetate–methanol precipitation as described in P. patens [31]. Note that a phenol-based method was not better suited for liverworts because the color of precipitated proteins (indicating contaminations) and acquired 2-DE gel was not found as satisfactorily as those produced by 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) extraction, followed by 20% TCA–acetone precipitation (Additional file 2: Figure S10).
The greatest advantage of the modified protocol for protein extraction and precipitation is that the method is very simple and fast; therefore, it can be applied to study the proteome of a wide range of liverworts.
Limitations
Despite being the first land plants and having a long evolutionary history, there have been very few proteomic studies in liverworts. This could be attributed to the presence of enormous secondary metabolites, which hinders the IEF and does not let the normal 2-DE protocol to be directly applied. Therefore, it is very important to optimize an efficient protocol for gel-based proteomics of liverworts.
