Skip to main content
Download PDF

Retinoschisis and Norrie disease: a missing link

BMC Research Notes volume 14, Article number: 204 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Retinoschisis and Norrie disease are X-linked recessive retinal disorders caused by mutations in RS1 and NDP genes respectively. Both are likely to be monogenic and no locus heterogeneity has been reported. However, there are reports showing overlapping features of Norrie disease and retinoschisis in a NDP knock-out mouse model and also the involvement of both the genes in retinoschisis patients. Yet, the exact molecular relationships between the two disorders have still not been understood. The study investigated the association between retinoschisin (RS1) and norrin (NDP) using in vitro and in silico approaches. Specific protein–protein interaction between RS1 and NDP was analyzed in human retina by co-immunoprecipitation assay and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. STRING database was used to explore the functional relationship.

Result

Co-immunoprecipitation demonstrated lack of a direct interaction between RS1 and NDP and was further substantiated by mass spectrometry. However, STRING revealed a potential indirect functional association between the two proteins. Progressively, our analyses indicate that FZD4 protein interactome via PLIN2 as well as the MAP kinase signaling pathway to be a likely link bridging the functional relationship between retinoschisis and Norrie disease.

Introduction

X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) is a retinal disorder caused by mutations in RS1 gene (encoding retinoschisin) leading to splitting of retinal layers which impairs visual signal processing [1, 2]. Retinoschisin (24-KDa) is a cell adhesion secretory protein which helps in maintaining structural and functional integrity of retina [3, 4]. RS1 is expressed mainly in photoreceptors and bipolar cells of the retina [2, 3] and also in pinealocytes [5]. Retinoschisis is rarely known to be associated with other ophthalmic disorders like Best disease, leukocoria, neovascular glaucoma and Coats’ disease, which are different ocular entities manifesting in the same eye [6,7,8,9].

Norrie disease (ND) is an X-linked recessive disorder, characterized by ocular dysgenesis, progressive mental retardation, and deafness [10]. NDP (Norrie disease pseudoglioma) is the gene implicated in the disorder and it accounts for a number of variations in the affected individuals [11, 12]. NDP encodes a small secretory protein termed Norrin (15-KDa), with limited expression in the brain, retina and olfactory bulb and it is assumed to be involved in neurogenesis and cell–cell interaction [13, 14]. Rarely variations in the NDP gene are known to cause diverse forms of NDP-related retinopathies such as Coat’s disease, X-linked familial exudative retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity and persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous [15,16,17,18].

Though genetic loci for retinoschisis (Xp22.13) and Norrie disease (Xp1.3) are distinct from each other, a knock-out mouse model of ND has been shown to exhibit retinoschisis-like alterations [2, 11, 19]. There is also a report on familial retinoschisis patients harboring digenic variations in RS1 and NDP genes, yet, segregating only with XLRS pathology [20]. It is further intriguing to note that certain ocular features like retrolental fibrovascular membrane, retinal traction, and retinal detachment are common features of both the disorders [21]. These findings might be indicative of an unknown association or interaction between RS1 and NDP.

To understand the biological basis of pathogenesis and to subsequently develop methods for prevention and treatment, it is necessary to identify the molecules and the mechanisms triggering, participating, and controlling the disease process. In many disorders, protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks are being explored as there exists a complex interplay between disease genes [22, 23]. So far, only few specific RS1 binding partners have been identified such as Na+/K+ ATPase, SARM1, alphaB crystalline, beta2 laminin and L-type voltage-gated calcium channel [24,25,26]. Likewise, NDP has been shown to interact with leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 4, frizzled class receptor 4 (FZD4), LDL receptor related protein 5 and tetraspanin 12 [27,28,29,30]. There is no comprehensive study on the complete interactome of RS1 or NDP, which might provide insights into the unknown functional role of the two proteins. Therefore, we were interested to assess the physical interaction between RS1 and NDP in human retinal tissue and investigate the molecular network of RS1 and NDP to show the functional relationship.

Main text

Methods

Retinal tissue was isolated from human donor eyes (50 to 60 years old) with no history of ocular morbidities from CU Shah Eye bank, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India. To determine physical interaction between RS1 and NDP, co-immunoprecipitation was performed in the human retinal tissue and to further investigate the complete interactome of retinoschisin and norrin, the immunoprecipitated complexes were analyzed by peptide mass fingerprinting. The resulting peptide spectra were analysed through the MASCOT search engine against Swissprot database [31]. Gene Ontology (GO) based functional annotation and enrichment analysis of data sets; FunRich (Functional Enrichment Analysis Tool) and STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) were used to predict the functional association between the two target proteins along with the interactomes [32, 33].

A detailed methodology section is provided as additional file 1.

Results

Protein–protein interaction between RS1 and NDP

The physical association between RS1 and NDP was investigated in the human retina using co-immunoprecipitation assay. On immunoblotting, RS1 was identified in the RS1 immunoprecipitated complex, while NDP was not detected (Fig. 1A). Likewise, in the NDP immunoprecipitated fraction, NDP was found, while RS1 was not detected (Fig. 1B). These in vitro experiments revealed that RS1 and NDP did not exhibit any physical interaction as evident from Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Immunoblot images of RS1 co-immunoprecipitation assay showing the presence of retinoschisin, but the absence of norrin in the immunoprecipitated (IP) fraction. B Immunoblot images of NDP co-immunoprecipitation assay showing the presence of norrin, but the absence of retinoschisin in the immunoprecipitated (IP) fraction

Full size image

Identifying the putative binding partners of RS1 and NDP

To validate the co-immunoprecipitation results, the immunoprecipitated complex of RS1 and NDP were individually analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The resultant MS spectra did not detect NDP in the RS1 immunoprecipitated complex and, RS1 was not identified in the NDP complex. Further, to understand the functional relationship, we scrutinized the MS spectra of RS1 and NDP complex for other potential binding partners. Though the MASCOT analysis identified 190 genes in RS1 sample and 159 genes in NDP sample, most of the protein hits were below the threshold protein score (p < 0.05). The complete lists of putative RS1 and NDP binding proteins are provided in the Additional file 2, 3 (Table S1 and S2). ACTB (Beta-Actin) was exclusively found to have a significant protein score of 72 and 48 in the RS1 and NDP immunoprecipitated complex respectively.

Gene ontology-based categorization and functional annotation using FunRich revealed that RS1 and NDP binding partners were significantly enriched in the biological process of signal transduction and cell communication (29.9% and 28.8% respectively). On the basis of cellular compartment, it was observed that a majority of the RS1 and NDP associating proteins were localized to the cytoplasm (41% and 35.2% respectively). Classification based on clinical phenotype showed that the proteins were involved in neurological, eye and central nervous system functions. The distribution of proteins under each category is represented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gene ontology-based categorization of proteins identified in the immunoprecipitated complex of RS1 and NDP, analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. A Clinical phenotype. B Molecular function. C Cellular component. D Biological process

Full size image

Functional protein–protein interaction network prediction

With STRING database, the network map individually derived for RS1 and NDP showed proteins representing the first shell of interactors which included genes derived from text mining as well as experimental evidences and no direct protein interactions were observed between RS1 and NDP (Fig. 3A, B). As the aim of the study was to learn primarily about the functional association between RS1 and NDP, a network map was established feeding RS1and NDP as the query input genes (Fig. 3C, D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Interaction network map of RS1 and NDP generated using STRING. In the PPI network graphs, the nodes represent the proteins and the lines connecting them represent the interactions between them. A PPI of Retinoschisin. B PPI of Norrin. C PPI showing the association between retinoschisin and norrin. D The network of proteins focussed on the major interactions between RS1 and NDP, inter-cluster edges are represented by dashed-lines

Full size image

Accordingly, 169 and 200 proteins found to be interacting with RS1 and NDP respectively, from the MALDI analysis along with the already known interactions of the respective proteins were processed further for network analysis. From this processed protein network (Fig. 3C, D), it was observed that hypothetically RS1 and NDP would crosstalk indirectly by means of Perilipin-2, or Calcium uniporter regulatory subunit MCUb (CCDC109B). In case of the interaction via Perilipin (Combine score: 0.621), it mainly contributed putatively by Low-density lipoprotein receptor that leads to FZD4 (Combine score-0.971) and NDP. On the other hand, via CCDC109B, RS1 indirectly interacts by means of Prohibitin-2—RAF (proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase) (Combined Score: 0.610)—Ras-related protein Ral-B and FZD4 (Combined Score: 0.594) leading to crosstalk with NDP (Combined Score: 0.997).

Discussion

A study on protein interactions is fundamental to the understanding of biological systems and disease mechanism. Deciphering protein interactomes is a challenging task due to the dynamic nature of the protein–protein interactions and the fact that they are highly cell-state specific [34]. Accordingly, while literature suggest the existence of digenic involvement of RS1 and NDP in the pathophysiology of retinoschisis and Norrie disease, ours is a preliminary study wherein, apart from in vitro experiments using human retinal samples, we have used in silico approaches using open access protein–protein interaction databases that provide information derived from multiple sources like experimental findings, computational predictions, mining of other databases and literature [35], to determine the association between the two proteins of interest, RS1 and NDP.

Many PPI based association between disorders have been proposed with the assumption that network neighbour gene of a target disease gene is likely to be involved in a specific biological process causing a similar disease or phenotype [36]. Based on this concept, we have correlated the MS data with the STRING predicted PPI network to establish the link between retinoschisis and Norrie disease. Of note, 23 candidate proteins were identified in the immunoprecipitated complex of both RS1 as well as NDP, though with less protein score. Representative common candidate proteins include ubiquitin thioesterase otulin, myoglobin, C-type lectin domain family 2 member B, dual specificity protein phosphatase 22, humanin-like 3, hipocalcin-like protein 4, wings apart-like protein etc. The list of common proteins and their respective biological significance is provided in Additional file 4: Table S3.

Our data show that though NDP and RS1 were not directly interacting, there might be an indirect interaction through FZD4. NDP binds with extracellular cysteine rich domain of FZD4 receptor and β-propeller of LDLR 5/6 thus activating canonical β-catenin signaling which plays a role in eye development and angiogenesis [37]. Mutation in the LDLR5 receptor and FZD4 causes Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR). PLIN2 directly interacts with the lipid molecule and helps in the structure of phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin supporting the function of cholesterol and fatty acid. LDLR promotes the endocytosis of cholesterol-rich LDL and maintains the LDL level in plasma [38]. However, there is no experimental evidence that specified the direct interaction between PLIN2 and LDLR. But studies stated that overexpression of PLIN2 resulted in a decrease of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase with no decrease in LDLR [39]. Correspondingly, retinoschisin binds negatively charged membrane lipids, such as phosphatidylserine as well as phosphoinositides and might associate with Perilipin 2. This correlates with the functional role of retinoschisin in facilitating cell–cell adhesion processes in the retina, via homomeric interaction between its octamers present on the surface of two neighboring cells which is required for normal structure and function of the retina. Taken together, FZD4 via PLIN2 may act as the crucial point for the indirect interaction of NDP to RS1.

It is also noteworthy to mention that MAPK Erk1/2 pathway has been reported to be the predominant pathway implicated in the pathogenesis of retinoschisis as well as Norrie disease knock-out mouse models [40, 41]. In addition, a recent study has demonstrated the role of RS1 in regulating MAP kinase signaling and apoptosis in the retina [42]. Supporting this finding, many proteins (RAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase, Phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinase, MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase, Ras-related protein Rab) involved in the MAPK signaling pathway were detected in the immunoprecipitated complex of RS1 and NDP [43,44,45].

Nevertheless, there may be likely incidences where open access databases might miss crucial data obtained from experimental evidence. Likewise, in vitro techniques such as MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry may fail to provide a complete set of interacting proteins due to its detection limits. Hence it is necessary to validate and characterize these proteins more extensively in order to understand the true functional relationship between the two disorders.

Despite the fact that the proteins identified by immunoprecipitation coupled with MS analyses did not exhibit a good protein score due to stringent analysis criteria, we sought to identify the probable and putative binding partners of the two target proteins.

Furthermore, it was interesting to correlate our immunoprecipitated MS data with the microarray based differential gene expression analysis of a retinoschisis and Norrie disease knock-out mouse models individually. Several proteins detected in the RS1 immunoprecipitated complex were reported to be either upregulated or downregulated in the RS1 deficient retina [40]. With reference to NDP, we found IQ domain containing protein, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor and actin in the upregulated list of genes, while solute carrier family and zinc finger protein were among the downregulated genes in NDP knock-out mice [41]. This information might help in understanding the complex interaction network of RS1 and NDP.

Conclusion

Based on our findings and analyses, we conclude that RS1 and NDP do not involve in a direct protein–protein interaction. Though our results provide evidence for the lack of a physical interaction, elaborate investigation and the possible indirect functional association needs to be carried out. PPI analysis has indicated that FZD4 protein interactome via PLIN2 as well as the MAP kinase signaling pathway to be a likely link bridging the functional relationship between retinoschisis and Norrie disease.

Limitations

Any conclusions derived based on in vitro as well as in silico PPI methods needs to be validated since these approaches are subjected to their own limitations. The results obtained has prompted us to study the complete immunoprecipitated complex of RS1 as well as NDP using more advanced mass spectrometric platforms, which might serve as a template for future investigations on the interaction network of RS1 or NDP.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets on RS1 and NDP binding proteins as well as the list of common proteins along with their respective biological significance are presented as supplementary spreadsheets.

Abbreviations

RS1:

Retinoschisin

NDP:

Norrie disease pseudoglioma

XLRS:

X-linked retinoschisis

ND:

Norrie disease

PPI:

Protein–protein interaction

MS:

Mass spectrometry

GO:

Gene ontology

FunRich:

Functional enrichment analysis tool

STRING:

Search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins

ACTB:

Beta actin

FZD4:

Frizzled class receptor 4

PLIN2:

Perilipin 2

MAP kinase:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

LDLR 5/6:

Low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 5/6

FEVR:

Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy

References

  1. George N, Yates J, Moore A. X linked retinoschisis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79(7):697–702. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.7.697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sauer C, Gehrig A, Warneke-Wittstock R, Marquardt A, Ewing C, Gibson A, et al. Positional cloning of the gene associated with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis. Nat Genet. 1997;17(2):164–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1097-164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Molday L, Hicks D, Sauer C, Weber B, Molday R. Expression of X-linked retinoschisis protein RS1 in photoreceptor and bipolar cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(3):816–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molday R. Focus on molecules: retinoschisin (RS1). Exp Eye Res. 2007;84(2):227–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.12.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takada Y, Fariss RN, Muller M, Bush RA, Rushing EJ, Sieving PA. Retinoschisin expression and localization in rodent and human pineal and consequences of mouse RS1 gene knockout. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1108–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva R, Berrocal A, Lam B, Albini T. Novel mutation in BEST1 associated with retinoschisis. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2013;131(6):794–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.2047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang N, Liu L, Chen H, Tsai S, Chang T, Tsai T, Yang C, Chao A, Chen K, Kao L, Yeung L. Clinical presentations of X-linked retinoschisis in Taiwanese patients confirmed with genetic sequencing. Mol Vis. 2015;21:487–501.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hung J, Hilton G. Neovascular glaucoma in a patient with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis. Ann Ophthalmol. 1980;12:1054–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berinstein D, Hiraoka M, Trese M, Shastry B. Coats’ disease and congenital retinoschisis in a single eye: a case report and DNA analysis. Ophthalmologica. 2001;215(2):132–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000050844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Warburg M. Norrie disease. Birth defects. 1971;7(3):117–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger W, Meindl A, van de Pol T, Cremers F, Ropers H, Döerner C, et al. Isolation of a candidate gene for Norrie disease by positional cloning. Nat Genet. 1992;1(3):199–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0692-199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith S, Mullen T, Graham D, Sims K, Rehm H. Norrie disease: extraocular clinical manifestations in 56 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(8):1909–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meindl A, Berger W, Meitinger T, van de Pol D, Achatz H, Dörner C, et al. Norrie disease is caused by mutations in an extracellular protein resembling C–terminal globular domain of mucins. Nat Genet. 1992;2(2):139–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1092-139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ye X, Wang Y, Cahill H, Yu M, Badea T, Smallwood P, et al. Norrin, Frizzled-4, and Lrp5 signaling in endothelial cells controls a genetic program for retinal vascularization. Cell. 2009;139(2):285–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Black G, Perveen R, Bonshek R, Cahill M, Clayton-Smith J, Lloyd IC, McLeod D. Coats’ disease of the retina (unilateral retinal telangiectasis) caused by somatic mutation in the NDP gene: a role for norrin in retinal angiogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(11):2031–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.11.2031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Z, Battinelli E, Fielder A, Bundey S, Sims K, Breakefield X, et al. A mutation in the Norrie disease gene (NDP) associated with X–linked familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. Nat Genet. 1993;5(2):180–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1093-180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shastry B, Pendergast S, Hartzer M, Liu X, Trese M. Identification of missense mutations in the norrie disease gene associated with advanced retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(5):651–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150653015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aponte E, Pulido J, Ellison J, Quiram P, Mohney B. A novel NDP mutation in an infant with unilateral persistent fetal vasculature and retinal vasculopathy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2009;30(2):99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810802705755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruether K, van de Pol D, Jaissle G, Berger W, Tornow R, Zrenner E. Retinoschisis like alterations in the mouse eye caused by gene targeting of the Norrie disease gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(3):710–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiraoka M, Rossi F, Trese M, Shastry B. X-linked juvenile retinoschisis: mutations at the retinoschisis and Norrie disease gene loci? J Hum Genet. 2001;46(2):53–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100380170108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Godel V, Goodman R. X-Linked recessive primary retinal dysplasia: clinical findings in affected males and carrier females. Clin Genet. 1981;20(4):260–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1981.tb01031.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bockler B, Bateman A. Protein interactions in human genetic diseases. Genome Biol. 2008;9(1):R9.1-R9.12. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ideker T, Sharan R. Protein networks in disease. Genome Res. 2008;18(4):644–52. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.071852.107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Molday L, Wu W, Molday R. Retinoschisin (RS1), the protein encoded by the X-linked retinoschisis gene, is anchored to the surface of retinal photoreceptor and bipolar cells through its interactions with a Na/K ATPase-SARM1 complex. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:32792–801. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M706321200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi L, Jian K, Ko M, Trump D, Ko G. Retinoschisin, a new binding partner for L-type voltage-gated calcium channels in the retina. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:3966–75. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806333200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Steiner-Champliaud M, Sahel J, Hicks D. Retinoschisin forms a multi-molecular complex with extracellular matrix and cytoplasmic proteins: interactions with beta2 laminin and alphaB-crystallin. Mol Vis. 2006;12:892–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deng C, Reddy P, Cheng Y, Luo C, Hsiao C, Hsueh A. Multi-functional norrin is a ligand for the LGR4 receptor. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(9):2060–8. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.123471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu Q, Wang Y, Dabdoub A, Smallwood P, Williams J, Woods C, Kelley M, Jiang L, Tasman W, Zhang K, Nathans J. Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand-receptor pair. Cell. 2004;116(6):883–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00216-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiyuan K, Kaleeckal G, Harikumar C, Chen C, Xin G, Liren W, Parker N, Cheng Z, Xu W, Williams B, Melcher K, Miller L, Xu E. Structure and function of Norrin in assembly and activation of a Frizzled 4–Lrp5/6 complex. Genes Dev. 2013;27(21):2305–19. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.228544.113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Junge H, Yang S, Burton J, Paes K, Shu X, French D, Costa M, Rice D, Ye W. TSPAN12 regulates retinal vascular development by promoting Norrin—but not Wnt-induced FZD4/beta-catenin signaling. Cell. 2009;139(2):299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Perkins D, Pappin D, Creasy D, Cottrell J. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:3551–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18%3c3551::AID-ELPS3551%3e3.0.CO;2-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pathan M, Keerthikumar S, Ang C, Gangoda L, Quek C, Williamson N, Mouradov D, Sieber O, Simpson R, Salim A, Bacic A. FunRich: a standalone tool for functional enrichment analysis. Proteomics. 2015;15(15):2597–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Snel B, Lehmann G, Bork P, Huynen M. STRING: a web-server to retrieve and display the repeatedly occurring neighbourhood of a gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(18):3442–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.18.3442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonetta L. Protein-protein interactions: interactome under construction. Nature. 2010;468(7325):851–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/468851a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rao V, Srinivas K, Sujini G, Kumar G. Protein–protein interaction detection: methods and analysis. Int J Proteomics. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/147648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sevimoglu T, Kazim Y. The role of protein interaction networks in systems biomedicine. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2014;11(18):22–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2014.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ke J, Harikumar KG, Erice C, Chen C, Gu X, Wang L, Parker N, Cheng Z, Xu W, Williams BO, Melcher K, Miller LJ, Xu HE. Structure and function of Norrin in assembly and activation of a Frizzled 4-Lrp5/6 complex. Genes Dev. 2013;27(21):2305–19. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.228544.113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Leren TP. Sorting an LDL receptor with bound PCSK9 to intracellular degradation. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.08.038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McIntosh A, Senthivinayagam S, Moon K, Gupta S, Lwande J, Murphy C, et al. Direct interaction of Plin2 with lipids on the surface of lipid droplets: a live cell FRET analysis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2012;303(7):C728–42. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00448.2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gehrig A, Langmann T, Horling F, Janssen A, Bonin M, Walter M, Poths S, Weber B. Genome-wide expression profiling of the retinoschisin-deficient retina in early postnatal mouse development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schafer N, Luhmann U, Feil S, Berger W. Differential gene expression in Ndph-knockout mice in retinal development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(2):906–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-1731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Plossl K, Weber B, Friedrich U. The X-linked juvenile retinoschisis protein retinoschisin is a novel regulator of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling and apoptosis in the retina. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(4):768–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Molina J, Adjei A. The Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1(1):7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Neel N, Martin T, Stratford J, Zand T, Reiner D, Der C. The RalGEF-Ral effector signaling network the road less traveled for anti-Ras drug discovery. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(3):275–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601911407329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bulley S, Clarke J, Droubi A, Giudici M, Irvine R. Exploring phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinase function. Adv Biol Regul. 2015;57:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbior.2014.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Shrimpex Biotech Services for performing the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analyses.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India (RGYI scheme: BT/PR15111/GBD/27/322/2011), obtained by Jayamuruga Pandian Arunachalam.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jayamuruga Pandian Arunachalam

    Present address: Central Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility (CIDRF), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Campus, Pondicherry, 607402, India

  2. Rahini Rajendran and Dhandayuthapani Sudha equally contributed to the work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility (CIDRF), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Campus, Pondicherry, 607402, India

    Rahini Rajendran

  2. SN ONGC Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Vision Research Foundation, Nungambakkam, Chennai, 600006, India

    Dhandayuthapani Sudha & Jayamuruga Pandian Arunachalam

  3. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India

    Subbulakshmi Chidambaram

  4. Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, 600006, India

    Hemavathy Nagarajan

  5. National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Indian Council of Medical Research, Belagavi, 590010, India

    Umashankar Vetrivel

Authors
  1. Rahini Rajendran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhandayuthapani Sudha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Subbulakshmi Chidambaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hemavathy Nagarajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Umashankar Vetrivel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jayamuruga Pandian Arunachalam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RR and DS performed immunoprecipitation assays, carried out mass spectrometry data interpretation and wrote the manuscript; SC designed the protein experimentation and ensured troubleshooting; HN and VUS did the insilico analysis; JPA conceptualized the overall study, obtained funding, contributed to data analysis and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayamuruga Pandian Arunachalam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments involving the usage of human donor eye tissues were approved by Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Vision Research Foundation (Ref no. 202-2009-P) and adhered to the tenets of declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Detailed methodology.

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Complete list of proteins identified in the RS1 immunoprecipitated complex analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Additional file 3:

Table S2. Complete list of proteins identified in the NDP immunoprecipitated complex analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Additional file 4:

Table S3. List of common proteins identified in both RS1 and NDP MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajendran, R., Sudha, D., Chidambaram, S. et al. Retinoschisis and Norrie disease: a missing link. BMC Res Notes 14, 204 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05617-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05617-5

Keywords

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us