Skip to main content

Effects of FUdR on gene expression in the C. elegans bacterial diet OP50

Abstract

Objective

Many C. elegans aging studies use the compound 5-fluro-2ʹ-deoxyuridine (FUdR) to produce a synchronous population of worms. However, the effects of FUdR on the bacterial gene expression of OP50 E. coli, the primary laboratory C. elegans food source, is not fully understood. This is particularly relevant as studies suggest that intestinal microbes can affect C. elegans physiology. Therefore, it is imperative that we understand how exposure to FUdR can affect gene expression changes in OP50 E. coli.

Results

An RNAseq dataset comprised of expression patterns of 2900 E. coli genes in the strain OP50, which were seeded on either nematode growth media (NGM) plates or on FUdR (50 µM) supplemented NGM plates, was analyzed. Analysis showed differential gene expression in genes involved in general transport, amino acid biosynthesis, transcription, iron transport, and antibiotic resistance. We specifically highlight metabolic enzymes in the l-histidine biosynthesis pathway as differentially expressed between NGM and FUdR exposed OP50. We conclude that OP50 exposed to FUdR results in differential expression of many genes, including those in amino acid biosynthetic pathways.

Introduction

Many C. elegans aging studies use the compound 5-fluro-2ʹ-deoxyuridine (FUdR) to produce a synchronous population of worms. FUdR is often added directly to nematode growth media (NGM) agar plates to prevent egg hatching by inhibiting DNA synthesis [1, 2]. However, the effects of FUdR on the bacterial gene expression of OP50 E. coli, the primary laboratory C. elegans food source, is not fully understood. This is particularly relevant as studies suggest that intestinal microbes can affect host physiology [3,4,5]. Indeed, bacterial metabolites such as colanic acid extend host lifespan whereas folic acid reduces lifespan [6, 7]. E. coli is also known to produce compounds affecting host neuronal function including GABA and lactate which contribute to neuroprotection [8]. While bacterial metabolites are essential to host nutrition and physiology in worms, bacterial load accumulates as the host ages leading to death and a reduced lifespan [9]. Recently, it has also been shown that E. colis metabolic conversion of FUdR to 5-fluorouridine monophosphate (FUMP) can impair C. elegans fecundity and highlight the role of bacteria in host health [10,11,12]. Moreover, FUdR may directly affect C. elegans hosts by improving thermal stress response, protein homeostasis, and altering lifespan in some mutant backgrounds [6, 13,14,15]. Thus, further studies analyzing the gene expression changes in OP50 E. coli exposed to FUdR may provide insight into aging and other studies.

Main text

To assess the role of FUdR on bacterial gene expression changes, we analyzed a dataset of gene expression differences between OP50 E. coli seeded on NGM agar plates and on NGM plates supplemented with 50 μM FUdR (NGM + FUdR). This analysis was part of a previous study examining how bacterial gene expression changed in different genetic models of aging, including the longer-lived daf-2/insulin-like growth factor receptor and shorter-lived daf-16/FOXO transcription factor mutants [16]. The RNAseq data comprised of 2900 E. coli genes; Q scores of reads were determined by FastQC and filtered for reads at a 4-base average Q score of 20 or lower using Trimmomatic, as previously described [17]. The raw gene counts (per million) were transformed into a log2 scale and cleared of low-quality reads by removing 25% of the probes with the weakest signal. We then identified the top 158 genes with an interquartile range (IQR) > 1.5 (Additional file 1: Table S1). We identified the biological functions of these genes and found genes that are involved in amino acid biosynthesis (32), general transport (28), stress response (13), transcription (12), DNA repair (7), iron transport (6), DNA damage (5), and antibiotic resistance (4). We surmise that some of these genes may be regulated in direct response to FUdR’s effect on DNA.

We further limited our list by examining genes with an IQR > 2.5, which resulted in 28 genes with the greatest differential gene expression (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Hierarchical clustering showed that bacteria from NGM only plates clustered most closely with other NGM only plates, and away from bacteria exposed to FUdR. We found that several of these differentially expressed genes (DEG), including hisA, hisB, hisC, hisD, hisG, and hisI, belong to the l-histidine biosynthesis pathway (Fig. 2). Each of these genes are upregulated in E. coli treated with FUdR compared to NGM only. These genes operate under an operon, suggesting that histidine production is increased by FUdR. Histidine can impact cell functions such as energy metabolism and growth, and is necessary in many enzymes as a proton acceptor or donor [18]. Indeed, targeting l-histidine metabolism enzymes may be a therapeutic target to limit survival of Myobacterium tuberculosis and other bacteria, suggesting a critical role for histidine in bacterial survival [19, 20]. Previous reports in bacteria also show that histidine starvation can induce metabolomic changes in E. coli and that histidine dehydrogenase (hisD) is important for bacterial survival against pathogens [18, 21, 22]. Interestingly, histidine is an essential amino acid for worms and can lead to moderate increases in C. elegans’ mean lifespan, of gst-4 and nhr-57 expression, and resistance to heavy metal toxicity [23, 24]. Given that dietary histidine can have a wide range of benefits for humans, including reduction of inflammation, blood pressure, and metabolic syndrome, our findings may highlight the importance of understanding histidine metabolism in host-bacterial interactions [19].

Fig. 1
figure1

Differentially expressed OP50 E. coli genes in response to FUdR. Heatmap demonstrating the top 28 differentially expressed genes in E. coli (in triplicate) grown on either NGM only (NGM.1–3) or NGM plates supplemented with 50 µM FudR (FudR.1–3)

Table 1 Top differentially expressed genes when exposed to 50 µM FUdR
Fig. 2
figure2

Gene expression differences in the bacterial l-histidine biosynthetic pathway. Pathview plots show differences in the average expression counts of functional enzymes in the l-histidine metabolism pathway between E. coli grown on NGM or NGM + FudR plates. The color in the rectangles indicates the average CPM expression of E. coli on NGM only (left) compared to E. coli exposed to FudR (right). We observed that several enzymes in the l-histidine biosynthesis pathway are upregulated in OP50 E. coli when exposed FudR

We also found that FUdR downregulated genes affecting the amino acid tryptophan in OP50 E. coli, including the metabolic enzyme antthranilate synthase, trpE (2.87-fold decrease, P = 2.81 × 10–24), and the tryptophan specific transport protein gene, mtr (4.56-fold decrease, P = 5.44 × 10–46). It is unknown whether FUdR affects tryptophan levels in this study, but decreased trpE expression may be indicative of elevated l-tryptophan. trpE acts as an early step of l-tryptophan biosynthesis and is susceptible to feedback regulation by l-tryptophan [25]. Previous work demonstrated that an increased abundance of tryptophan is associated with increased lifespan in C. elegans and microbial tryptophan may serve pro-immune functions in other hosts [26, 27]. However, others show that tryptophan can cause toxicity in worms independent of FUdR, and that pathogenic E. coli use tryptophan to produce a secreted toxin that kills hosts [11, 28]. Furthermore, knockout of the transporter mtr has been shown to reduce tryptophan intake in E. coli, but increase internal l-tryptophan production [29]. Thus, our observations support that FUdR increases l-tryptophan production, and may be part of the mechanism that diminishes C. elegans health.

Our analysis also revealed that the iron storage ferritin protein gene, ftnA is significantly upregulated by FUdR (3.96-fold increase, P = 7.42 × 10–42). Furthermore, fhuF and fhuCDB, which are downregulated by FUdR, are components of ferri-siderophore transport of iron in bacterial membranes. Iron homeostasis is critical for bacteria and other organisms, but it is unclear how FUdR affects iron balance [30]. A lack of intestinal and pharyngeal ferritin in ftn-1 C. elegans mutants results in reduced longevity [31]. Importantly, it is not known whether gene expression changes in bacteria ultimately alter bacterial tryptophan or iron abundance. Further studies are needed to specifically address the impact of E. colis l-histidine biosynthesis enzymes, mtr and trpE expression, ftnA expression, and other differentially expressed genes and the effects FUdR on C. elegans physiology and lifespan.

Work examining bacterial metabolism in worms has identified that E. coli and Comamonas can metabolize FUdR and impact host physiology [10, 11]. Garcia-Gonzalez et al. [10] found that bacteria can either metabolize FUdR to produce fluorouridine monophosphate (FUMP) and affect ribonucleotide metabolism, or to be part of DNA metabolism via FdUMP. FUMP can be synthesized by direct conversion of FUdR into 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by deoA (thymidine phosphoarylase) and conversion of 5-FU into FUMP by upp (uracil phosphoribosyltransferase). Interestingly, in our analysis, FUdR treated OP50 resulted in increased expression of both deoA (twofold; P = 0.7.52 × 10–6) and upp (twofold, P = 2.3 × 10–4) (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Furthermore, Ke et al. [11] showed that knockout of thymidine kinase (tdk), which directly converts FUdR to FdUMP, enhances the detrimental effects of FUdR. We did not find changes in expression of tdk or other downstream enzymes leading to thymidine (dTTP) synthesis (Additional file 2: Figure S1), suggesting that FUdR treated E. coli may be driven toward FUMP, not FdUMP production.

Bacteria in C. elegans have also been shown to metabolize folate to produce 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (5-meTHF), which then impacts methionine metabolism and lifespan in worms [32]. l-Serine to glycine interconversion can produce 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate (5,10-meTHF), a precursor of 5-meTHF, through the enzyme glyA. We did not observe changes in gene expression in glyA, but we did observe increased gene expression of two l-serine metabolism enzymes, serA (3.3-fold increase, P = 6.73 × 10–15) and serC (1.85-fold increase, P = 6.45 × 10–4) but not of serB, which directly synthesizes l-serine (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Thus, it is possible that the substrates necessary to produce 5-meTHF are elevated by FUdR. Furthermore, we did not observe changes in gene expression in thymidylate synthase (thyA), which uses 5,10-meTHF convert dUMP to dTMP. Further exploration is necessary to determine the effects of FudR alone on tetrahydrofolate biosynthesis.

Finally, to determine how gene responses to FUdR identified in this study compare to bacterial responses to other factors, we compared our gene list to those previously analyzed. First, our previous report identified a list of core genes in E. coli of 4-day-old C. elegans hosts. When comparing this to the 158 genes identified in this study, very few overlapped (5/158), suggesting that FUdR initiated a stress specific response. Our previous study also identified differentially expressed bacterial genes in C. elegans in various conditions, including temperature and host genotype. We compared those DEGs with genes that were differentially expressed in this study and found 23 common genes regulated by temperature (15 °C compared to 20 °C), 9 by daf-2/InsR mutations, and 17 by daf-16/FOXO mutations overlapped with our 158 genes (Additional file 3: Table S2). There were very few overlapping DEGs, which may be expected given that our study examined change in bacteria in vitro, and those conditions were in vivo. When comparing our dataset to transcriptomics analysis of E. coli exposed to volatile organic compounds, some common pathways regulated iron related gene regulation, including fhuF, and leucine biosynthesis [33]. Similarly, E. coli treated with the antibiotics potentiator bicarbonate led to increased expression of genes regulating tryptophan and iron, including those in the fhu operon [34]. Thus, amino acid and iron regulation may be common responses to chemical treatments, including FUdR.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these results highlight several genes regulated in OP50 E. coli in the presence of FudR. As bacterial diets affect C. elegans physiology and longevity, a greater understanding of metabolic networks in bacteria would provide insight to host-microbe interactions. Though this study identifies specific changes in E. coli biosynthesis genes and pathways in response to FudR, and further testing of metabolite changes and its impact on host physiology are needed.

Methods

Sample collection, RNA preparation, sequencing, and gene counts (counts per million) were collected as previously described [16]. Briefly, OP50 Escherichia coli (E. coli), a standard diet use for laboratory C. elegans, was seeded on nematode growth media (NGM) or NGM + 50 µM FudR agar plates. Bacteria were harvested from 3 experimental replicates (3 independent plates from 1 experiment) and prepared for transcriptomics analysis. Genes that mapped to E. coli were used for downstream analyses, and gene expression was compared in OP50 bacteria seeded NGM and NGM + FudR (50 µM) agar plates.

Pathview analysis

Average normalized CPM counts of identified l-Histidine biosynthesis enzymes were selected using Entrez Reference Sequence identification numbers and mapped to the E. coli Histidine Metabolism Pathway (EC00340) using the R package pathview on PathviewWeb [35,36,37,38,39,40]. Histidine metabolism pathway was simplified with focus on the l-Histidine biosynthesis pathway.

Heatmap and genetic analysis

Genes with an IQR > 1.5 produced 158 differentially expressed genes (DEG); (Additional file 1: Table S1). Ninety-two of those DEG were classified based on enzyme parent class and molecular function using EcoCyc and Uniprot databases [41, 42]. Gene counts with an IQR > 2.5 produced 28 DEG which had the greatest expression differences in the presence of FudR based on FDR, logFC, and P-value; this analysis was conducted in R 4.0.0 using the package edgeR and heatmaply [43,44,45,46,47,48]. Gene name, biological pathway, and protein function was determined using MetaCyc, EcoCyc, and Uniprot databases. [41, 42, 49].

Reagents

Bacteria StrainEscherichia coli strain OP50 provided by CGC (NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

Limitations

Our analysis of FudR on OP50 E. colis gene expression has identified gene expression differences caused by the presence of FudR. However, this analysis has only identified patterns in gene expression differences. To assess the mechanistic role of FudR on these pathways and downstream metabolites, further studies examining enzymatic changes in E. colis metabolism and its effect on host physiology are needed.

In addition to OP50, other E. coli strains including HB101 and HT115 are used as a C. elegans food source in lab settings. Furthermore, in the wild, C. elegans has been known to feed on a wide variety of bacteria including Pseudomonas, Ochrobactrum, Methylobacterium, Xanthomonas, and Sphingomonas [50,51,52,53]. As FudR is commonly used in combination with alterations in bacterial diets, further studies investigating the role of FudR in other bacterial strains may provide greater insight into the roles of bacterial metabolites on C. elegans.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The datasets used during this study are included in this published article and its additional information files.

References

  1. 1.

    Mitchell DH, Stiles JW, Santelli J, Sanadi DR. Synchronous growth and aging of Caenorhabditis elegans in the presence of fluorodeoxyuridine. J Gerontol. 1979;34(1):28–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gandhi S, Santelli J, Mitchell DH, Stiles JW, Sanadi DR. A simple method for maintaining large, aging populations of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev. 1980;12(2):137–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lenaerts I, Walker GA, Van Hoorebeke L, Gems D, Vanfleteren JR. Dietary restriction of Caenorhabditis elegans by axenic culture reflects nutritional requirement for constituents provided by metabolically active microbes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(3):242–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Neve IAA, Sowa JN, Lin CJ, Sivaramakrishnan P, Herman C, Ye Y, et al. Metabolite profiling leads to the development of an RNA interference strain for. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(1):189–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kumar A, Baruah A, Tomioka M, Iino Y, Kalita MC, Khan M. Caenorhabditis elegans: a model to understand host-microbe interactions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(7):1229–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Virk B, Correia G, Dixon DP, Feyst I, Jia J, Oberleitner N, et al. Excessive folate synthesis limits lifespan in the C. elegans: E. coli aging model. BMC Biol. 2012;10:67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cabreiro F, Gems D. Worms need microbes too: microbiota, health and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(9):1300–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Urrutia A, García-Angulo VA, Fuentes A, Caneo M, Legüe M, Urquiza S, et al. Bacterially produced metabolites protect C. elegans neurons from degeneration. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(3):e3000638.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Portal-Celhay C, Blaser MJ. Competition and resilience between founder and introduced bacteria in the Caenorhabditis elegans gut. Infect Immun. 2012;80(3):1288–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    García-González AP, Ritter AD, Shrestha S, Andersen EC, Yilmaz LS, Walhout AJM. Bacterial metabolism affects the C. elegans response to cancer chemotherapeutics. Cell. 2017;169(3):431-41.e8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ke W, Saba JA, Yao CH, Hilzendeger MA, Drangowska-Way A, Joshi C, et al. Dietary serine-microbiota interaction enhances chemotherapeutic toxicity without altering drug conversion. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2587.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Scott TA, Quintaneiro LM, Norvaisas P, Lui PP, Wilson MP, Leung KY, et al. Host-microbe co-metabolism dictates cancer drug efficacy in C. elegans. Cell. 2017;169(3):442-56.e18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Feldman N, Kosolapov L, Ben-Zvi A. Fluorodeoxyuridine improves Caenorhabditis elegans proteostasis independent of reproduction onset. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85964.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Angeli S, Klang I, Sivapatham R, Mark K, Zucker D, Bhaumik D, et al. A DNA synthesis inhibitor is protective against proteotoxic stressors via modulation of fertility pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging (Albany NY). 2013;5(10):759–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Anderson EN, Corkins ME, Li JC, Singh K, Parsons S, Tucey TM, et al. C. elegans lifespan extension by osmotic stress requires FUdR, base excision repair, FOXO, and sirtuins. Mech Ageing Dev. 2016;154:30–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chan JP, Wright JR, Wong HT, Ardasheva A, Brumbaugh J, McLimans C, et al. Using bacterial transcriptomics to investigate targets of host-bacterial interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5545.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Winkler ME, Ramos-Montañez S. Biosynthesis of histidine. EcoSal Plus. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.1.9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Monti SM, De Simone G, D’Ambrosio K. L-Histidinol dehydrogenase as a new target for old diseases. Curr Top Med Chem. 2016;16(21):2369–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lunardi J, Nunes JE, Bizarro CV, Basso LA, Santos DS, Machado P. Targeting the histidine pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(22):2866–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ohashi Y, Hirayama A, Ishikawa T, Nakamura S, Shimizu K, Ueno Y, et al. Depiction of metabolome changes in histidine-starved Escherichia coli by CE-TOFMS. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4(2):135–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wu H, Tian D, Fan X, Fan W, Zhang Y, Jiang S, et al. Highly efficient production of l-histidine from glucose by metabolically engineered. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9(7):1813–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Edwards C, Canfield J, Copes N, Brito A, Rehan M, Lipps D, et al. Mechanisms of amino acid-mediated lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genet. 2015;16:8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zečić A, Dhondt I, Braeckman BP. The nutritional requirements of. Genes Nutr. 2019;14:15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pabst MJ, Kuhn JC, Somerville RL. Feedback regulation in the anthranilate aggregate from wild type and mutant strains of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1973;248(3):901–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    van der Goot AT, Zhu W, Vázquez-Manrique RP, Seinstra RI, Dettmer K, Michels H, et al. Delaying aging and the aging-associated decline in protein homeostasis by inhibition of tryptophan degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(37):14912–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Roager HM, Licht TR. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3294.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Anyanful A, Dolan-Livengood JM, Lewis T, Sheth S, Dezalia MN, Sherman MA, et al. Paralysis and killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli requires the bacterial tryptophanase gene. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57(4):988–1007.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhao Z, Chen S, Wu D, Wu J, Chen J. Effect of mufti-gene knockout of L-tryptophan transport system on L-tryptophan production in Escherichia coli. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2011;27(12):1765–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodríguez-Quiñones F. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27(2–3):215–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kim YI, Cho JH, Yoo OJ, Ahnn J. Transcriptional regulation and life-span modulation of cytosolic aconitase and ferritin genes in C. elegans. J Mol Biol. 2004;342(2):421–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cabreiro F, Au C, Leung KY, Vergara-Irigaray N, Cochemé HM, Noori T, et al. Metformin retards aging in C. elegans by altering microbial folate and methionine metabolism. Cell. 2013;153(1):228–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yung PY, Lo Grasso L, Mohidin AF, Acerbi E, Hinks J, Seviour T, et al. Erratum: global transcriptomic responses of Escherichia coli K-12 to volatile organic compounds. Sci Rep. 2017;7:33108.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yung PY, Grasso LL, Mohidin AF, Acerbi E, Hinks J, Seviour T, et al. Global transcriptomic responses of Escherichia coli K-12 to volatile organic compounds. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19899.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Luo W, Pant G, Bhavnasi YK, Blanchard SG, Brouwer C. Pathview Web: user friendly pathway visualization and data integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W501–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Luo W, Brouwer C. Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(14):1830–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D590–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maglott D, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Tatusova T. Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Database issue):D54–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Keseler IM, Mackie A, Santos-Zavaleta A, Billington R, Bonavides-Martínez C, Caspi R, et al. The EcoCyc database: reflecting new knowledge about Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D543–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Consortium U. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D506–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(10):4288–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Galili T, O’Callaghan A, Sidi J, Sievert C. heatmaply: an R package for creating interactive cluster heatmaps for online publishing. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(9):1600–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12(2):115–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Davis S, Meltzer PS. GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(14):1846–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Caspi R, Billington R, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D633–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Dirksen P, Marsh SA, Braker I, Heitland N, Wagner S, Nakad R, et al. The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: gateway to a new host-microbiome model. BMC Biol. 2016;14:38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Berg M, Stenuit B, Ho J, Wang A, Parke C, Knight M, et al. Assembly of the Caenorhabditis elegans gut microbiota from diverse soil microbial environments. ISME J. 2016;10(8):1998–2009.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Félix MA, Braendle C. The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2010;20(22):R965–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Stuhr NL, Curran SP. Bacterial diets differentially alter lifespan and healthspan trajectories in C. elegans. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):653.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Marian University’s College of Arts and Sciences and Juniata College for their support of this work.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R15AG052933 (JC) and R15AG063103 (RL). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GM carried out experimental analysis and helped draft the manuscript. JC conceived the study and participated in its design. JC, JW, HTW, and RL participated in the design and investigation of the study. RL and JC carried out the initial conceptualization for the experiment and was responsible for the funding acquisition for this research. JC also participated in the formal analysis and coordinated and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Chan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have consented to the publication of this work.

Competing interests

We the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest concerning this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The top 158 differentially expressed genes in OP50 E. coli exposed to FUdR.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Gene expression differences of biosynthetic pathways for FUdR metabolism. Top, FUdR can be metabolized into FUMP or FdUMP. Expression of deoA and upp are increased (red arrows) in FUdR treated E. coli, whereas other metabolic enzmes do not show differential gene expression. (top) and 5,10-meTHF (bottom). Bottom, Serine can be metabolized to produce 5,10-meTHF. The expression of l-serine biosynthetic enzymes serA and serC increase in FUdR treated E. coli, but expression of enzymes directly snythesizing 5,10-meTHF from l-serine are not changed.

Additional file 3: Table S2.

Common bacterial genes in OP50 E. coli regulated in response to FUdR and in specific hosts.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McIntyre, G., Wright, J., Wong, H.T. et al. Effects of FUdR on gene expression in the C. elegans bacterial diet OP50. BMC Res Notes 14, 207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05624-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • C. elegans
  • E. coli
  • FUdR
  • Aging
  • Bacterial transcriptomics