Skip to main content

RAPD and ERIC-PCR coupled with HRM for species identification of non-dysenteriae Shigella species; as a potential alternative method

Abstract

Objective

Species identification of Shigella isolates are so prominent for epidemiological studies and infection prevention strategies. We developed and evaluated RAPD and ERIC-PCR coupled with HRM for differentiation of non-dysenteriae Shigella species as potential alternative methods. After isolation of eighteen Shigella strains from faecal specimens collected from children under 2 years of age with diarrhea (n = 143), the species of the isolates were identified by slide agglutination assay. Also, species were identified using developed RAPD-PCR-HRM and ERIC-PCR-HRM techniques. Differentiation of the data sets was measured by principal component analysis as a dimension reduction method. Then, sensitivity and specificity of the methods were evaluated.

Results

We found RAPD-PCR-HRM method with high sensitivity and specificity (100 and 85% respectively) to identify non-dysenteriae Shigella species in clinical specimens. However, sensitivity and specificity of ERIC-PCR-HRM were evaluated 33 and 46% respectively and significantly lower than that of RAPD-PCR-HRM assay. Regardless of inherent poor reproducibility of DNA fingerprinting-based methods, RAPD-PCR-HRM assay can be considered as a potential alternative method to identify non-dysenteriae species of Shigella in clinical specimens. As we observed in the current study, HRM technique is more rapid, inexpensive, and sensitive than gel electrophoresis method to characterize PCR amplicons.

Introduction

Shigella is a facultative anaerobe, gram-negative bacilli belonging to Enterobacteriaceae family and associated with intestinal and extraintestinal pathogenicity in human (Shigellosis). Four species have been characterized for Shigella including: S. sonnei, S. flexneri, S. boydii, and S. dysenteriae. Shigella species can cause mild to severe diarrhea as intestinal pathogens in adults and children (up to 28% fatality rate in children with severe symptoms); however, S. dysenteriae type 1, as an extraintestinal pathogen, may lead to hemorrhagic uremic syndrome [1] by production of Shiga-toxins [2]. There are significant differences between the severity and type of gastrointestinal disorders triggered by Shigella species [3]. Epidemiological studies revealed that identification of Shigella species plays a crucial role in providing clinical investigation and tracing of outbreaks caused by this pathogen [4]. The most outstanding challenge for identification of Shigella spp. is to differentiate species from each other [5]. Some of the differentiation methods consist of DNA hybridization, multiplex PCR, whole genome sequencing, immunocapture PCR and serological-based methods. Novel methods, still needed to be developed and optimized, are much affordable and user-friendly, with acceptable levels of specificity and sensitivity, than classical assays [6].

Sequence-based genotyping techniques are more expensive, time consuming, and complicated than other type [7]. Random amplification polymorphism DNA (RAPD) and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) have been widely used as non-sequencing-based tools for genotyping of foodborne pathogens [8]. Due to the complicated profiles of RAPD and ERIC-PCR results, special statistical or mathematical procedures such as dimension reduction methods are strongly suggested to be carried out for further analysis of PCR products, genomic characterization and species identification [9].

High resolution melting curve analysis (HRMA) characterizes the amplified PCR products as an alternative assay of gel electrophoresis with higher precision and differentiation ability [10]. This property of HRMA makes it a promising potential candidate for analysis of the complicated PCR products [11]. At the present study, we developed RAPD and ERIC-PCR fingerprinting assays coupled with HRMA following analysis by principal component analysis (PCA) to identify and differentiate Sh. sonnei, Sh. flexneri and Sh. boydii strains isolated from clinical specimens.

Main text

Fecal samples collection and bacterial isolation

Children under 2 years of age with diarrhea (n = 143) in Qazvin, Iran, during December 2019 to February 2020 were referred to the central laboratory of Ghods Children Hospital of Qazvin for microbiological examination [12]. All specimens were initially cultured on isolation media including MacConkey agar (Promedia, Spain) and Salmonella-Shigella agar (SSA, Promedia, Spain) and incubated aerobically for 24 h at 37 °C. Presumptive colonies were selected for biochemical identification. Biochemically confirmed colonies were analyzed for species identification by slide agglutination test, as the gold standard method for differentiation and identification of Shigella species, using DIFCO Shigella species specific antisera kit (Difco Lab, Michigan, USA) according to the manufacturers` instructions [13]. We used S. sonnei ATCC 25931; S. flexneri ATCC 12022; and S. boydii ATCC 12030, purchased from Pasteur institute of Iran (Pasteur institute, Tehran, Iran), as the reference strains.

Genomic DNA extraction

Bacterial isolates and the reference strains were inoculated into Luria‐Bertani broth (LB) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. After centrifugation at 6000 RPM for 10 min, bacterial pelletes were subjected to DNA extraction using Sinaclon gram-negative DNA extraction Kit (Sinaclon, Iran) according to the instructions described by the manufacturer. The quantity and quality of the extracted genome was evaluated using NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Before performing PCR-HRM, concentration of all DNA templates was adjusted to 50 ng µL-1.

RAPD and ERIC-PCR HRM

PCR-HRM method has been used for genotyping of different microbial isolates. As DNA fingerprinting methods such as RAPD and ERIC were used for differentiation of microbial species previously, we used these methods coupled with HRM to evaluate a more precise, specific and sensitive assay to identify the Shigella species in this study. We used the single random oligonucleotide primer UBC245 5`-CGC GTG CCA G-3` for RAPD-PCR and species identification of the isolates [14]. Each reaction tube contained 20 µL of mixture, including 10 µL of 2X HotStart EvaGreen PCR-HRM master mix (Solis BioDyne Co, Estonia), 0.5 µL of RAPD primer (20 pM), 1 µL of DNA template (50 ng), and distilled deionized water to the final reaction volume. HRM assay was performed using Rotor-Gene 6000 real-time PCR instrument (Corbett, Australia) as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 36 °C for 1 min, and 4 min at 72 °C. For performing ERIC-PCR, two primers have been used including ERIC1R 5`-ATG TAA GCT CCT GGG GAT TCA C-3` and ERIC2 5`-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC G-3` [14]. ERIC-PCR was performed in 20 µL final reaction volume containing 10 µL of 2X HotStart EvaGreen PCR-HRM master mix (Solis BioDyne Co, Estonia), 1 µL of each primer (10 pM), 1 µL of DNA template (50 ng), and distilled deionized water to the final reaction volume. Rotor-Gene 6000 real-time PCR instrument (Corbett, Australia) also was employed for HRM assay. Thermal cycling program was: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 52 °C for 1 min, and extension at 65 °C for 8 min. HRM was carried out from 70 to 95 °C at the rate of 0.1 °C. Normalized and difference melting curves finally were achieved using the Rotor-Gene 6000 series software version 1.7 (Corbett, Australia) by normalization of melting curves between 80 and 95 °C.

Data analysis

We used a dimension reduction method as a novel strategy for molecular subtyping by clustering and analysis of melting profiles which has previously been described by Reja et al. [15]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for clustering and differentiation of data sets by SPSS software version 23.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, USA). Those principal components (PCs) with Eigen value (Ev) more than 1 were retained as the different groups of data set for classification and differentiation of HRM difference curves as previously described by Reja et al. [15]. Sensitivity and specificity of the methods have been evaluated as previously described by Lalkhen et al. (2008)[16].

Results

We isolated and identified Shigella species in specimens collected from 18 out of 143 children under 2 years old with diarrhea (12.58%) consisting of 11 S. sonnei (PC3; Ev = 4.73), 3 S. boydii (PC1; Ev = 1.86), and 4 S. flexneri (PC2; Ev = 2.46) isolates using culture dependent techniques and serological tests. Then we developed and evaluated RAPD and ERIC-PCR coupled with HRM methods as a sensitive and specific potential alternative method for the species identification of Shigella isolates. Normalized and difference melting curves of the isolates using RAPD-PCR-HRM are shown in Fig. 1A and B, respectively. Because of extremely complicated nature of PCR products amplified in RAPD-PCR-HRM, complex melting curves were obtained and analyzed by conventional HRM software which made it difficult to differentiate melting profiles [17]. Therefore, we employed a dimension reduction method, PCA which has been recommended by many researchers, to simplify the analysis of this complex and huge data. PCA assay was performed on the data obtained from HRM difference plots. 3D scores plot obtained from PCA for the data set of difference melting curves of RAPD-PCR-HRM has been illustrated in Fig. 2A. PCA plot demonstrated three distinctive groups of curves which were considered as three species of Shigella among the isolates. Except one isolate which was S. boydii, species of other isolates were identified correctly using RAPD-PCR-HRM assay (11 S. sonnei (PC3; Ev = 4.73), 2 S. boydii (PC1; Ev = 1.86), and 4 S. flexneri (PC2; Ev = 2.46)).

Fig. 1
figure1

Normalized melting curves of RAPD-PCR-HRM A and ERIC-PCR-HRM C and difference melting plots of RAPD-PCR-HRM B and ERIC-PCR-HRM D for Shigella isolates (S. sonnei: red lines; S. boydii: black lines; S. flexneri: blue lines)

Fig. 2.
figure2

3D scores plots obtained from PCA of RAPD-PCR-HRM A and ERIC-PCR-HRM B of the Shigella isolates (Red spots: S. sonnei including SS: S. sonnei and SSR: S. sonnei reference; Black spots: S. boydii including SB: S. boydii and SBR: S. boydii reference; Blue spots: S. flexneri including SF: S. flexneri; SFR: S. flexneri reference)

ERIC-PCR-HRM was evaluated for species identification of Shigella isolates. Figure 1C and D showed normalized and difference plots of ERIC-PCR-HRM assay respectively for Shigella isolates. Difference plots of ERIC-PCR-HRM was analyzed using PCA assay to identify the different plot groups as three species of Shigella isolates. 3D scores plot obtained from PCA of the data set of ERIC-PCR-HRM has been shown in Fig. 2B. Nine species out of eighteen isolates were recognized incorrectly (6 S. sonnei (PC3; Ev = 1.66), 1 S. boydii (PC1; Ev = 3.08), and 2 S. flexneri (PC2; Ev = 1.29)). It has shown that RAPD-PCR-HRM assay is more sensitive and specific than ERIC-PCR-HRM to identify Shigella species when they are analyzed by PCA. Sensitivity and specificity of RAPD-PCR-HRM assay were calculated 100 and 85%, respectively. However, sensitivity and specificity of ERIC-PCR-HRM method were measured 33 and 46% respectively.

Discussion

DNA-fingerprinting methods recently have been proposed as the method for the purpose of microbial species identification. Tulsiani et al. (2010) used HRMA of RAPD-PCR products for characterization of Leptospira isolates to the serovar level. They were successful to develop a new method based on RAPD-PCR-HRM assay which was an inexpensive and rapid method to identify different serotypes of Leptospira isolates [18]. Miller et al. (2015) developed an HRM-based assay for identification of Pasteurellaceae species by amplification of different regions of 16 s rDNA sequences and they found this method sensitive and specific for Pasteurellaceae species identification [19]. Chen et al. (2019) employed RAPD-HRM assay for differentiation of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates and they found it sensitive, specific, and practical. There are limited studies about species identification and genotyping of bacterial pathogens using DNA fingerprinting methods coupled with HRM; however, several researchers applied these methods for differentiation of eukaryotic cells [17].

ERIC-PCR-HRMA has not been developed and used for molecular characterization of microbial genomes yet. We evaluated this method as a novel molecular technique for diagnostic and differentiation purpose [12]. During the HRM procedure, intercalating dyes bind to DNA and emit fluorescence because of reaction of double-strand DNA (dsDNA) and the intercalating dye. When the temperature is increased gradually, dsDNA is dissociated to single-strand DNA (ssDNA) and the decrease in fluorescence emission is measured using a highly sensitive fluorescence detector. It can be found that any difference, even a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), in the amplicon sequences significantly changes the melting profiles [20]. In DNA-fingerprinting methods such as RAPD and ERIC-PCR, a wide range of PCR products with different amplicon lengths are produced. These complex PCR products are considered as DNA markers to identify organisms and they can be characterized by different methods [21]. Gel electrophoresis is usually carried out for characterization of PCR products. HRM as a novel, rapid, inexpensive, sensitive and user-friendly method has recently been preferred to be used to characterize the PCR products [22].

ERIC sequences are repetitive elements located on some specific genomic regions present throughout the Enterobacteriaceae family genomes [23]. In RAPD-PCR, random regions of DNA are amplified during RAPD reaction and a wide range of amplicons are produced. Both used methods (RAPD and ERIC) are based on random amplification; however, higher level of variation of amplicons in RAPD-PCR should be responsible for its highly efficient differentiation capability [24]. As previously reported by several researchers, discriminatory indexes of RAPD-PCR were significantly higher than those of ERIC-PCR. It is worthy to note that the most prominent drawback of DNA-fingerprinting methods using random primers such as RAPD and ERIC-PCR is inherent poor reproducibility [25]. It is worthwhile to note that, PCR-HRM genotyping methods also can be used for differentiation of bacterial species in the future researches. However, it is greatly appreciated and suggested to improve and develop DNA-fingerprinting methods with higher reproducibility in the future studies.

Conclusions

At the present study we introduced RAPD-PCR-HRM assay as a potential alternative method to differentiate non-dysenteriae Shigella species from clinical samples. We found RAPD-PCR-HRM assay more sensitive and specific than ERIC-PCR-HRM as the potential of alternative method for differentiation of non-dysenteriae Shigella species with sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 85%, respectively. however, future studies with more sample size and novel molecular techniques are suggested to be implemented.

Limitations

  • 18 Shigella isolates from clinical samples may not be sufficient to develop a species identification method.

  • The most prominent drawback of RAPD and ERIC based methods is inherent poor reproducibility.

  • Also, the inherent limitation of PCR-HRM assay is its inability for simultaneous identification and differentiation of microbial species in a single reaction tube.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DNA:

DeoxyriboNucleic Acid

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

RAPD:

Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA

ERIC:

Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus

HRMA:

High Resolution Melting Curve Analysis

PCA:

Principal Component Analysis

References

  1. 1.

    Murphy ER, Roßmanith J, Sieg J, Fris ME, Hussein H, Kouse AB, et al. Regulation of OmpA translation and Shigella dysenteriae virulence by an RNA thermometer. Infect Immun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00871-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kotloff KL, Riddle MS, Platts-Mills JA, Pavlinac P, Zaidi AK. Shigellosis. The Lancet. 2018;391(10122):801–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bennish ML, Ahmed S. Shigellosis. In: Hunter's tropical medicine and emerging infectious diseases. Elsevier; 2020. p. 492–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-55512-8.00048-X

  4. 4.

    Taneja N, Mewara A. Shigellosis: epidemiology in India. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143(5):565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Baker KS, Dallman TJ, Field N, Childs T, Mitchell H, Day M, et al. Horizontal antimicrobial resistance transfer drives epidemics of multiple Shigella species. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhou K, Kuiling S, Friedrich AW, Kooistra-Smid AM. Evaluation of a culture dependent algorithm and a molecular algorithm for identification of Shigella spp., Escherichia coli, and entero-invasive E. coli (EIEC). J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e00510-e518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bertani G, Sardaro MLS, Neviani E, Lazzi C. AFLP protocol comparison for microbial diversity fingerprinting. J Appl Genet. 2019;60(2):217–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shrivastava A, Singhal PK, Shrivastava P. Molecular diagnosis of enteric bacterial pathogens. In: Dash HR, Shrivastava P, Mohapatra BK, editors. DNA fingerprinting: advancements and future endeavors. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 151–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cui C, Li Y, Liu Y, Li X, Luo S, Zhang Z, et al. Determination of genetic diversity among Saccharina germplasm using ISSR and RAPD markers. CR Biol. 2017;340(2):76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Farrar JS, Wittwer C. High-resolution melting curve analysis for molecular diagnostics. In: Molecular diagnostics. Elsevier; 2017. p. 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802971-8.00006-7

  11. 11.

    He P, Wang H, Luo J, Yan Y, Chen Z. A real-time PCR with melting curve analysis for molecular typing of vibrio parahaemolyticus. Curr Microbiol. 2018;75(9):1206–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Codjoe FS, Brown CA, Smith TJ, Miller K, Donkor ES. Genetic relatedness in carbapenem-resistant isolates from clinical specimens in Ghana using ERIC-PCR technique. PLoS ONE. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Andini N, Wang B, Athamanolap P, Hardick J, Masek BJ, Thair S, et al. Microbial typing by machine learned DNA melt signatures. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42097.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Abolghait SK, Fathi AG, Youssef FM, Algammal AM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from chicken meat and giblets often produces staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) in non-refrigerated raw chicken livers. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;328:108669.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Reja V, Kwok A, Stone G, Yang L, Missel A, Menzel C, et al. ScreenClust: advanced statistical software for supervised and unsupervised high resolution melting (HRM) analysis. Methods. 2010;50(4):S10–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lalkhen AG, McCluskey A. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Cont Educ Anaesthesia Crit Care Pain. 2008;8(6):221–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen Y, Lai Y, Shyu D, Chang Y, Chen Z, Liao Y, et al. C-terminal part of glutamate-ammonia-ligase adenyltransferase gene identified by RAPD-HRM with 3H primer for E. Coli Screening. Folia Biol. 2019;65(2):88–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tulsiani S, Craig S, Graham G, Cobbold R, Dohnt M, Burns M-A, et al. High-resolution melt-curve analysis of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD–HRM) for the characterisation of pathogenic leptospires: intra-serovar divergence, interserovar convergence, and evidence of attenuation in Leptospira reference collections. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2010;104(5):427–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miller M, Zorn J, Brielmeier M. High-resolution melting curve analysis for identification of Pasteurellaceae species in experimental animal facilities. PLoS ONE. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ohshima C, Takahashi H, Iwakawa A, Kuda T, Kimura B. A novel typing method for Listeria monocytogenes using high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) of tandem repeat regions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;253:36–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Magyar T, Gyuris É, Ujvári B, Metzner M, Wehmann E. Genotyping of Riemerella anatipestifer by ERIC-PCR and correlation with serotypes. Avian Pathol. 2019;48(1):12–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vossen RH. Genotyping DNA variants with high-resolution melting analysis. In: White SJ, Cantsilieris S, editors. Genotyping. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 17–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tsai H-C, Chou M-Y, Wu C-C, Wan M-T, Kuo Y-J, Chen J-S, et al. Seasonal distribution and genotyping of antibiotic resistant strains of listeria innocua isolated from a river basin categorized by ERIC-PCR. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yang H, Liu T, Zhang G, Chen J, Gu J, Yuan L, et al. Genotyping of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis isolates from Chinese traditional sourdoughs by multilocus sequence typing and multiplex RAPD-PCR. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;258:50–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Staji H, Birgani SF, Raeisian B. Comparative clustering and genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from broiler and turkey feces by using RAPD-PCR and ERIC-PCR analysis. Ann Microbiol. 2018;68(11):755–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly thank and appreciate all experimental technicians in Veterinary Campus, University of Tehran and physicians in Qazvin University of Medical Science for helping us performing laboratory analysis and faecal sample collection.

Funding

This research was supported by the research grant of National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD, http://nimad.ac.ir) of Iran with the Grant Number of 964212.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BP, AKh and Aka designed the research and performed all experiments; AAB and AKh supervised the project; BP, LA, AAB, WMB and AKh performed all analysis; BP and WMB wrote the first draft; WMB and AAB finalized and reviewed the manuscript; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript..

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afshin Akhondzadeh Basti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol for clinical samples was evaluated, reviewed, and approved by the ethics committee of National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD-964212). The written consent was taken from the parents of infant patients in the local language.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pakbin, B., Basti, A.A., Khanjari, A. et al. RAPD and ERIC-PCR coupled with HRM for species identification of non-dysenteriae Shigella species; as a potential alternative method. BMC Res Notes 14, 345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05759-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • PCR-HRM
  • Species identification
  • Shigella
  • Clinical samples