Skip to main content
  • Research note
  • Open access
  • Published:

App-based strength and balance self-test in older adults: an exploratory study from a user perspective



Falls are a common problem, especially in the older population. The number of older adults aged over 65 years is increasing globally, leading to a major challenge in providing effective fall prevention interventions to older adults requiring such interventions. This study aimed to explore the usability of an app-based strength and balance self-tests in a small sample of four older adults. This study is a side product of another project.


The results from this study indicated that self-test of strength and balance by using a smartphone application is a challenge for older adults. Basic test measures, such as start and stop and counts of sit-to-stand, were difficult to self-administer. However, from a user perspective, the possibility of independently performing these measures was considered important and needed to be further developed and evaluated in future studies.


Falls are a common problem, especially in older adults, with over 30% of community-dwelling older adults experiencing one or more falls annually and the risk steadily increasing with age. Falls are the leading cause of disability and accidental death in older adults [1, 2]. Several functions are closely associated with risk for falls, especially strength and balance functions, highlighted and well documented in the fall prevention research literature [3, 4]. Objective measures of strength and balance in older adults are widely used to predict falls, and detecting changes at an early stage could be crucial to improving or preventing future falls [5]. Clinical instruments have been developed to address strength [6] and aspects of balance [7]. However, these clinical instruments are predominantly used by professionals and not for self- tests. Recently using smartphones to assess strength and balance has shown promising results and correlations with commonly used clinical instruments [8,9,10]. Further digitally provided fall prevention exercises and self-assessment of physical functions via smartphones or personal computers have previously been investigated. There is great potential for using smartphones as a tool for self-assessing physical functions [11, 12]. These innovations in mobile health (mHealth) technology provide new possibilities in assessing older adults’ strength and balance functions.

In 2017, a research project started in Sweden aiming to develop a fall prevention exercise application for smartphones [13]. The application included exercises from one of the most commonly used fall prevention programs, the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP) [14]. During the application’s development, an interest in adding fall risk self-assessment emerged, which was further investigated as a side product of the main project. Since two common strength and balance clinical tests are used before fall prevention exercise prescription, these were of interest to further investigate and to integrate in the application. This study aimed to explore usability of app–based self-tests of strength and balance functions in a small sample of four older adults.

Main text


In this study, three women and one man, aged 68–83 years, participated. These four older adults were recruited from an ongoing project evaluating the usability of an exercise application based on OEP [13]. They were all recruited by contact with an organization for retired persons in middle Sweden. In a monthly organization meeting, the prospective participants received verbal and written information about the purpose of the study. They were invited to participate in the development process of evaluating the usability of the app-based fall prevention exercise by using a smartphone (Android). Therefore, they were all familiar and had experienced using smartphones before this study. The choice to use a smartphone application was made since smartphones are also increasing among older adults. The target group in the main study was age ≥ 65 years, able to walk independently, and without any cognitive impairments. In this study, two commonly used clinical tests were used when screening strength and balance functions prior to fall prevention exercise prescription. The tests were developed as standalone tests and integrated into the fall prevention exercise application under development. The test used was;

Chair stand test (CST), a chair is placed against a wall, and sit-to-stand is performed five times as fast as possible while timed. Performing five sit-to-stands for more than 15 s has shown an increased risk of falling [6].

Four-test balance scale consists of four static balance positions that increase in difficulty and must be performed without support; feet together, semi-tandem stance, tandem stance, and one-leg stand. Each position should be held for 10 s without moving the feet or needing support. If the person does not stand in a tandem position for 10 s, there is a risk of falling [7].

For this study, a prototype was developed for pilot testing in five healthy middle-aged individuals before the test in older adults as a safety precaution before introducing the app to the older participants.

Description of app-based tests

For both tests, illustrations, text, and voiceover instruction of the performances (including timing) are presented in all steps (see Fig. 1). Each test started with instructions to take the position and, when ready, click the start button to initiate the test.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Screenshots of four-test balance scale

For the four-test balance scale, the time stops automatically after 10 s, and participants press “thumbs up or thumbs down” to manage the test and move forward to the next step (Fig. 1). The CST has the same structure as the four-test balance scale, except for the timing of the performance, which must be stopped manually after five sit-to-stands.


Before testing, a chair was placed in the room for the CST test. The participants were asked to self-administer the tests using the app on their smartphones. The participants did not receive any guidance from the assessors during the tests. Two assessors, one physiotherapist (PT) and one research assistant were present during the tests. The assessors observed while the participants attempted to self-administer the tests, recording issues and errors using field notes.

The participants were unfamiliar with the tests before the session. The participants were told to hold the smartphone in their hands during the performance. Instructions were provided in the application, text, visual, and voiceover that instructed the user on what to do once the test sequence had been initiated. After the participants had performed the tests, the PT performed the test according to the original clinical test manual.


The participants completed the tests, and the results from each test are presented in Table 1. Each session lasted approximately 30 min.

Table 1 Results of the self-test accompanied by a clinical test (assessor) (n = 4)

Field notes

The participants expressed that the tests were significantly interesting to perform; they were also significantly satisfied with their results. The tests were difficult to perform in the beginning since their bodies were relatively stiff at first. Subsequently, their bodies were more flexible, and the test was more easily performed. They also expressed that these measures should be performed at the same timepoint to achieve more exact performance each time.

The participants expressed that they were relatively “sloppy” when they performed the tests. The instructions were the most important part. All instructions needed to be significantly thoroughly described, and the participants should have sufficient patience to listen fully to the instructions before performing the tests. In the CST test, the voiceover of the counts of seconds was confusing, and they lost track of their sit-to-stand counts. The participants also believed that the shortcoming of counts sit to stand would be overcome if tests were automatically registering movements from sit to stand. According to the participants, they also missed pressing the button when the tests were completed. This needs to be clear since the results otherwise will be inaccurate.

In the four-test balance scale, the participants were not familiar with the word semi-tandem, even if an illustration accompanied the word. Overall, the start and stop buttons need to be more visible by using strong colors.


This paper describes the usability testing of two commonly used clinical tests for identifying fall risk among older adults, CST and the four-test balance scale. One common error in both tests was to press “Start test” without first observing and listening to the instructions. Further error was to press “Stop test” in CST. These usability issues were also confirmed in previous research when performing self-test of physical functions in older adults [8, 12]. These basic test measures, such as start and stop and sit-to-stand counts, significantly affect the results (time). However, smartphones have been suggested to be capable of becoming a widespread and low-cost tool for assessing balance and physical functions; therefore need to be further evaluated and validated [8, 15]. From a user perspective, the participants expressed the possibility of independently performing these measures as important, positively influencing motivation to perform these basic test measures and acquire knowledge regarding their health status. The self-test and clinical test differed in both time and performance quality, which were previously addressed in a study by Mansson et al. [16]. They concluded balance performance to be a challenge to measure, including increased postural sway, which was observed in this study during the self-test. This aspect is especially important in practice when adjusting and prescribing correct individual balance exercises, emphasizing the risk of falls.

The user perspective is important when designing and developing new ways to measure parameters important to health, especially for self-test purposes. Therefore, the gap between functional evaluation and user experience with technology is addressed in this study and highlighted in a systematic review by Ruopeng and Sosnoff [17]. There is a need to include the users in the development process, and in this study, participants’ performance was valuable for further development of the application in the main project.

This study indicated that performing self-tests is considered a challenge for older adults to self-administer correctly. There is a need to explore ways to use technology appropriately to self-assess physical functions, such as strength and balance, safely and purposefully aiming towards independence in older adults.


The results from this study suggest smartphones as a future alternative for self-assessment of strength and balance in a non-supervised setting. There is a need to develop tools that are easy to use, easy to understand, have clear instructions, visually guide users, and have some automatic functions to support the performance when self-administrating strength and balance functions. Validity between app-based self-tests and clinical instruments for strength and balance needs to be further validated in future studies.


This study has some limitations. The sample size was small, comprising four participants only. However, the experiences and results obtained from this study were consistent and provided valuable information to be included in the further development of self-tests in fall prevention. The field notes could be viewed as a limitation; however, this pragmatic way of collecting data was satisfactory and provided valuable knowledge in our study for further development.

Availability of data and materials

The software and code are not available, other app related material and datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.



Otago Exercise Programme




  1. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Sherrington C, Gates S, Clemson LM, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2010;21:658–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, Howard K, et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherrington C, Fairhall N, Kwok W, Wallbank G, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, et al. Evidence on physical activity and falls prevention for people aged 65+ years: systematic review to inform the WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Phelan EA, Mahoney JE, Voit JC, Stevens JA. Assessment and management of fall risk in primary care settings. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99:281–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M85-94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rossiter-Fornoff JE, Wolf SL, Wolfson LI, Buchner DM, FICSIT Group. A cross-sectional validation study of the FICSIT common data base static balance measures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A:M291–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mellone S, Tacconi C, Chiari L. Validity of a smartphone-based instrumented timed up and go. Gait Posture. 2012;36:163–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerrito A, Bichsel L, Radlinger L, Schmid S. Reliability and validity of a smartphone-based application for the quantification of the sit-to-stand movement in healthy seniors. Gait Posture. 2015;41:409–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coni A, Ancum JMV, Bergquist R, Mikolaizak AS, Mellone S, Chiari L, et al. Comparison of standard clinical and instrumented physical performance tests in discriminating functional status of high-functioning people aged 61–70 years old. Sensors. 2019;19:449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGarrigle L, Boulton E, Todd C. Map the apps: a rapid review of digital approaches to support the engagement of older adults in strength and balance exercises. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergquist R, Vereijken B, Mellone S, Corzani M, Helbostad JL, Taraldsen K. App-based self-administrable clinical tests of physical function: development and usability study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2020;8:e16507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arkkukangas M, Cederbom S, Tonkonogi M, Umb CÕ. Older adults’ experiences with mHealth for fall prevention exercise: usability and promotion of behavior change strategies. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas S, Mackintosh S, Halbert J. Does the “Otago exercise programme” reduce mortality and falls in older adults?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2010;39:681–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong R, Rau PLP. Are cost-effective technologies feasible to measure gait in older adults? A systematic review of evidence-based literature. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;87:103970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mansson L, Bäckman P, Öhberg F, Sandlund J, Selling J, Sandlund M. Evaluation of concurrent validity between a smartphone self-test prototype and clinical instruments for balance and leg strength. Sensors. 2021;21:1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun R, Sosnoff JJ. Novel sensing technology in fall risk assessment in older adults: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Thanks to Later Life Training Ltd, UK for use of the illustrations of the OEP exercises used in the App. We would like to especially thank the company Delphie for their collaboration in the development process.


Open access funding provided by Mälardalen University. This study was supported by the Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MA wrote the manuscript. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Arkkukangas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We followed the 1964 Helsinki Declaration, which concerns human rights, informed consent, and correct procedures concerning treatment in research involving human participants. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all the participants in the study. The study was approved by the regional ethics committee in Uppsala, Sweden (Dnr: 2018/425-31).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arkkukangas, M. App-based strength and balance self-test in older adults: an exploratory study from a user perspective. BMC Res Notes 14, 379 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: