Skip to main content

Costs incurred by patients with oral potentially malignant disorders: is there a public health need for financial protection in India?

Abstract

Objectives

Financial protection mechanisms are in place to overcome the costs of a few diseases in India. Our objective was to estimate the costs incurred due to Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMD) and to determine predictors of such costs.

Results

We found that the median (Interquartile range IQR) total costs of OPMD was Indian Rupees (INR) 500 (350–750), direct medical costs was INR 0 (0–50), direct non-medical costs was INR 150 (40–200) and indirect costs was INR 350 (250–500). The travel cost to attend the health facilities [INR 100 (40–150)] and the patient’s loss of wages [INR 200 (150–400)] mainly accounted for the direct non-medical and indirect costs respectively. The median expenditure on smokeless and smoking forms of tobacco was INR 6000 (5400–7200) and INR 2400 (1800–3600) respectively. On multiple linear regression analysis, rural residence, belonging to below poverty line family, being a sole earner in the family, number of months since diagnosis and first visit at a private provider were found to be the significant predictors of total costs of OPMD. Financial protection mechanisms are needed for covering the direct non-medical and indirect costs. Early management of OPMD might mitigate the costs of OPMD.

Introduction

Oral cancer is almost always preceded by clinically visible lesions that are noncancerous, to begin with, and which have therefore been termed oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) [1, 2]. Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), leukoplakia, erythroplakia, and lichen planus are the most commonly described OPMD [1, 2]. Globally, the burden of OPMD was reported to be 4.5%, majorly contributed by OSMF (5%) and leukoplakia (4%) [3]. The highest prevalence rates were among the Asian (11%) and South American/Caribbean populations (4%), while the lowest was observed in North America (0.11%) [3]. In India, a varying prevalence has been reported (4–58%) [4,5,6,7], 10% being the overall prevalence in western India [5].

Existing literature on costs of OPMD, none from India, focused on the costs borne by the healthcare facilities in treating these patients [8, 9]. The average annual cost borne by a hospital for a patient with oral lichen planus was reported as £400 (~ 36 000 Indian Rupees—INR) and the cost of laser surgery for OPMD was reported as £998 (~ INR 89 000) during 2015–16 [8, 9]. Evidence is scarce on costs incurred by patients with OPMD and on the predictors associated with such costs in India. Evidence suggests that financial protection mechanisms are beneficial in reducing morbidity as well as mortality among cancer patients [10, 11]. We conducted this study to estimate the costs incurred by patients for the care of OPMD and to determine the predictors of such costs in the Bhavnagar district of Gujarat (western India).

Main text

Methods

Study design, setting and participants

We conducted a cross-sectional study in the outpatient department (OPD) of the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Sir Takhtsinhji Hospital of Bhavnagar district of Gujarat from July–September 2019. The population of Bhavnagar district and Bhavnagar city as per census 2011 is around 2.8 million and 0.6 million respectively (a sparsely-populated semi-urban and rural setting) [12]. Patients ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with OPMD by an Otorhinolaryngology specialist at our hospital were included in the study.

Sample size

A pilot study was conducted among 40 OPMD patients in the hospital, which reported the standard deviation of total costs of OPMD as 1133. A sample size of 219 was calculated using the formula N = 4Zα2S2/W2,[13] considering 95% confidence level (Zα = 1.96), the desired width of the confidence interval (W) as 300, and a standard deviation (S) of 1133.

Recruitment and sampling

The principal investigator (PI—first author) enrolled patients in the study through the register maintained by the staff nurse of Otorhinolaryngology OPD. On an average day in the Otorhinolaryngology OPD of our hospital manages approximately 10–15 patients with OPMD. Every second patient was enrolled consecutively in the study. After the written informed consent procedure, the questionnaire was administered by the PI.

Study tool

The questionnaire used for the study was a validated tool of the World Health Organization (WHO) for estimating direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs among tuberculosis patients, which was adapted for estimating costs among OPMD patients [14].

Cost survey

The costs incurred by patients were summed up for the visits they made starting from the symptoms of OPMD till they were diagnosed or treated at our hospital (that is, till the time of interview). The costs were categorized as direct medical costs (costs for consultation, hospital admission, medicine, radiology, laboratory, and any diagnostic procedures), direct non-medical costs (costs for travel, food, and accommodation) and indirect costs. Indirect costs included patient’s and accompanying member’s loss of wages, and monthly family income before symptoms of OPMD minus monthly family income at the time of interview. The total costs included the sum of direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs incurred by the patients for the care of OPMD. The expenditure on consuming tobacco (both smokeless as well as smoking forms) was calculated from the time they first started their consumption until the time of the interview (it was not added to any category of costs of OPMD). During the study period, on an average, one US$ equalled 70 INR.

Variables

The primary outcome variable was the total healthcare costs incurred by OPMD patients as a continuous variable. The predictor variables were age in years, male gender, residence (rural vs. urban), years of education, occupation requiring labour, being a sole earner in the family, belonging to below poverty line family, having OSMF, time since diagnosis, time since consuming smokeless tobacco and having the first visit at a private provider.

Statistical analysis

The healthcare costs (being a continuous variable) was expressed in terms of median and interquartile range (IQR) as the skewness (4.7) and kurtosis (33.3) values suggested a lack of normality. Uni-variable linear regression analysis was performed to find out predictors to be included in the multi-variable analysis. The predictor variables with p-value < 0.2 on uni-variable regression were included in the multivariable analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied using the “Enter” method for finding out the significant predictors of total healthcare costs of OPMD. The difference was said to be significant when the p-value was < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of patients

A total of 223 eligible patients were enrolled in the study (4 patients did not agree to participate in the study). The median age of the patients was 35 (IQR 28–45) years, 78% were male, 24% had no schooling, 75% belonged to other backward classes (OBC), 47% were living in the rural area and 71% had an occupation requiring labour (Table 1). The median family income was Indian Rupees (INR) 15 000 (IQR 10 000–20 000), 41% were belonging to below poverty line family and 27% were sole earners in their family. The median expenditure of consuming smokeless and smoking forms of tobacco was INR 6000 (IQR 5400–7200) and INR 2400 (IQR 1800–3600) respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients were newly diagnosed, 28% were on treatment for OPMD and 8% had first visited a private provider.

Table 1 Characteristic of patients with oral potentially malignant disorder at Bhavnagar during July–September 2019 (n = 219) [one US$ = 70 INR]

Cost burden of OPMD

The direct medical costs incurred by patients with OPMD were low and were contributed mainly by costs for the purchase of medicines [median INR 0 (IQR 0–50)] (Table 2). The median of the direct non-medical costs was INR 150 (IQR 40–200). The travel cost to attend the health facilities [median INR 100 (IQR 40–150)] mainly accounted for the direct non-medical costs. The median indirect costs among the patients were INR 350 (IQR 250–500). The indirect costs were mainly contributed by the patient’s loss of wages [median INR 200 (IQR 150–400)]. The median total costs of OPMD was INR 500 (IQR 350–750) and was mainly contributed by the indirect costs.

Table 2 Median (IQR) in Indian Rupee (INR) of costs incurred by patients with oral potentially malignant disorders at Bhavnagar during July–September 2019 (n = 219) [one US$ = 70 INR]

Predictors of costs of OPMD

Age in years, male gender, rural residence, being a sole earner in the family, belonging to below poverty line family, number of months since diagnosis, number of years since consuming smokeless tobacco, and having the first visit at a private provider were the variables found to have a p-value < 0.2 on unadjusted uni-variable linear regression analysis [see Additional file 1].

On performing multiple linear regression, rural residence, belonging to below poverty line family, being a sole earner in the family, number of months since diagnosis, and first visit at a private provider were found to be significantly predicting total costs of OPMD (Table 3). Rural residence, increase in one month since diagnosis and having the first visit at a private provider increased the total costs of OPMD by INR 1.2, 1.5, and 1.7 respectively. Belonging to below the poverty line family and being a sole earner in family decreased the total costs of OPMD by INR 1.2 and 1.3 respectively. The results of the regression indicated that the predictors explained 45.6% of the variance [adjusted R2 = 0.456, F(8,205) = 23, p < 0.001]. Age in years, male gender, and the number of years since consuming smokeless tobacco were not significantly predicting costs of OPMD.

Table 3 Multiple linear regression analysis for variables predicting total costs of OPMD at Bhavnagar during July–September 2019 (n = 219)

Discussion

Patients with OPMD incurred lower direct medical and total healthcare costs when compared with their monthly family incomes in this study setting. As might be the case with patients managed at a government hospital, patients with OPMD in the present study incurred lower direct medical costs due to free diagnostic and treatment services. Over 90% of patients first visited our facility (government-run) for the management of OPMD. The low percentage of patients visiting private providers indicates their healthcare-seeking behaviour towards the public health system. Almost half of the patients resided in rural areas where specialist services of the private sector are scarce. Also, since three-fourth of the patients were diagnosed on the first visit when the cost survey took place, the costs for pre-diagnostic visits elsewhere were not incurred. None of the patients required hospitalization and were managed on an OPD basis, cancelling out costs of hospitalization.

The loss of wages of patients with OPMD and the travel cost for attending health facilities were the prominent costs reported in this study. Early identification and appropriate case management of OPMD would be pertinent in reducing the costs. The current study found substantially high expenditure on tobacco consumption (especially for SLT) among OPMD patients. Studies in India have documented similar expenditures on tobacco consumption in other populations as well [15,16,17]. Tobacco cessation activities would arrest the initiation and progression of OPMD into oral cancer, and would eventually allay current and future healthcare costs.

The present study found that rural residence, duration since diagnosis of OPMD, and having the first visit at a private practitioner increased the costs of OPMD. Patients staying in rural areas have to travel to the tertiary care centres, which are usually found in towns or cities, for the care of their OPMD complaints. Also, due to the long travel, there is a possibility of delayed care-seeking and a longer duration of diagnosis since the onset of symptoms. Also, the poor accessibility to specialists in rural areas makes patients seek care at local traditional healers or quacks or private practitioners, thereby adding to the costs incurred for OPMD. These findings were supported by research on the determinants of catastrophic expenditures in patients with cancer [18,19,20].

We conclude that the costs of OPMD in our setting are low, however, the need for financial protection mechanisms such as universal cash transfers should be explored to overcome the direct non-medical and indirect costs. This is the first study estimating the healthcare costs of patients with OPMD in a sparsely-populated district of western India with a high caseload. Further studies are required in densely-populated urban metropolitan settings of India for estimating costs, and exploring the effects of early management, tobacco cessation, and financial protection on cost mitigation among patients with OPMD.

Limitations

There are a few inherent limitations of studies estimating costs. Since the costs are estimated based on a survey, recall bias is inherent. However, we interviewed more than 90% of patients within a month of diagnosis to avoid recall bias. We could not use any scale for assessing the severity of OPMD among the patients, which might have differentially affected the costs incurred. Also, costs incurred till the resolution of symptoms or cure or progression could not be included as we did not follow up with the patients. Our study did not employ the ‘cost of illness’ perspective, that is, we did not estimate the financial burden incurred by the hospital for the care of the patients. Since patients taking treatment at a private facility were not included, the study findings can be generalized only to patients being treated at government health facilities in similar semi-urban settings of India.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Mendeley repository, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/kp8tnz6jzz/1.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

GATS:

Global Adult Tobacco Survey

INR:

Indian Rupees

IQR:

Interquartile range

OBC:

Other backward class

OPD:

Outpatient department

OPMD:

Oral potentially malignant disorders

OSMF:

Oral submucous fibrosis

PI:

Principal investigator

SC:

Scheduled caste

SLT:

Smokeless tobacco

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

ST:

Scheduled tribe

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Manne RK. Oral potentially malignant disorders/individuals. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:e7-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Warnakulasuriya S, Johnson NW, Van Der Waal I. Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:575–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mello FW, Miguel AFP, Dutra KL, Porporatti AL, Warnakulasuriya S, Guerra ENS, et al. Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47:633–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pahwa V, Nair S, Shetty RS, Kamath A. Prevalence of oral premalignant lesions and its risk factors among the adult population in Udupi Taluk of coastal Karnataka, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:2165–70. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.8.2165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pratik P, Desai VD. Prevalence of habits and oral mucosal lesions in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26:196–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mehrotra R, Pandya S, Chaudhary AK, Kumar M, Singh M. Prevalence of oral pre-malignant and malignant lesions at a tertiary level hospital in Allahabad, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:263–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-8632.128484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Srivastava R, Sharma L, Pradhan D, Jyoti B, Singh O. Prevalence of oral premalignant lesions and conditions among the population of Kanpur City, India: a cross-sectional study. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9:1080. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_912_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ni Riordain R, Christou J, Pinder D, Squires V, Hodgson T. Cost of illness of oral lichen planus in a UK population—a pilot study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016;45:381–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thomson PJ. Potentially malignant disorders-the case for intervention. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;38:42–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Aguilar RR, Antonio J, Saucedo M, Martínez ST. Financial risk of increasing the follow—up period of breast cancer treatment currently covered by the Social Protection System in Health in México. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0094-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ventura-Alfaro CE, Torres-Mejía G, Ávila-Burgos LD. Hospitalization and mortality in Mexico due to breast cancer since its inclusion in the catastrophic expenditures scheme. Salud Publica Mex. 2016;58:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Registrar General of India. Ministry of Home Affairs. Government of India. Census of India 2011—district census handbook Bhavnagar: primary census abstract. New Delhi: Government of India; 2011. https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2414_PART_B_DCHB_BHAVNAGAR.pdf.

  13. 13.

    Hulley S, Cummings S, Browner W, Grady D, Newman T. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    World Health Organization. Tuberculosis patient cost surveys: a handbook (Annex 1: generic survey instrument). Geneva: WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tata Institute of Social Science (TISS) Mumbai and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. Global Adult Tobacco Survey GATS 2. Mumbai; 2017.

  16. 16.

    Rupani MP, Parikh KD, Kakadia MJ, Pathak MM, Patel MR, Shah MA. Cross-sectional study on smokeless tobacco use, awareness and expenditure in an urban slum of Bhavnagar, western India. Natl Med J India. 2019;32:137–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-258X.278686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Schensul JJ, Nair S, Bilgi S, Cromley E, Kadam V, Mello SD, et al. Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai. Tob Control. 2013;22:324–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Doshmangir L, Yousefi M, Hasanpoor E, Eshtiagh B, Haghparast-Bidgoli H. Determinants of catastrophic health expenditures in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020;18:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00212-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kimman M, Jan S, Yip CH, Thabrany H, Peters SA, Bhoo-Pathy N, et al. Catastrophic health expenditure and 12-month mortality associated with cancer in Southeast Asia: results from a longitudinal study in eight countries. BMC Med. 2015;13:190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0433-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Leng A, Jing J, Nicholas S, Wang J. Catastrophic health expenditure of cancer patients at the end-of-life: a retrospective observational study in China. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Ranadip Chaudhary, Research Scientist at CHRD-SAS (New Delhi) for his advice in statistical analysis and review of the manuscript for improvements. We also thank the study participants and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Sir Takhtsinhji Hospital Bhavnagar for their support in the research (Dr. Vikas Sinha, Dr. Sushil Jha, Dr. Bhagirath Parmar, resident doctors and other support staff).

Funding

This is a non-funded research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both the authors contributed to conception, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, clinical studies, data analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. JRP collected the data and drafted the first draft of the manuscript. MPR reviewed and edited it for corrections. Both authors approve the final version of the article. Both authors will act as guarantors of the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihir P. Rupani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was taken from the Ethics Committee of Government Medical College Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India (no. 877/2019). Written informed consent was taken from study participants before the interview.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mihir P. Rupani: Affiliation during study period: Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College Bhavnagar (Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University), Near ST bus stand, Jail Road, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, 364001, India.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Table showing the unadjusted linear uni-variable regression analysis for variables predicting total costs of OPMD at Bhavnagar during July-September 2019.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, J.R., Rupani, M.P. Costs incurred by patients with oral potentially malignant disorders: is there a public health need for financial protection in India?. BMC Res Notes 14, 396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05814-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Oral precancerous lesions
  • Catastrophic costs
  • Oral cancer
  • Cash transfer schemes
  • Financial protection
  • Tobacco cessation