Skip to main content

RE-COVER project: A survey on resilience, mental health, and fear of Covid-19 in four countries

Abstract

Objectives

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the mental health of people worldwide. Psychological resilience has been shown to buffer against the threat of the pandemic (i.e., COVID-19 fear) and sustain mental health. The extent to which psychological resilience factors impact mental health maintenance, however, is unclear, given broad differences in infection rates, prevention approaches, government interventions across different cultures and contexts. Our study examines resilience factors and how they protect individuals from COVID-19-related fear and sustain their mental health.

Data description

Data were collected from 1583 (Mage = 32.22, SD = 12.90, Range = 19–82) respondents from Japan, China, the United States, and Malaysia between October to November 2020. We collected data across age and sex, marital status, number of children, and occupations. We also accounted for stay-at-home measures, change in income, COVID-19 infection status, place of residence, and subjective social status in the study. Our variables included mental health-related and resilience constructs, namely (i) fear of COVID-19, (ii) depression, anxiety, and stress; (iii) present, past, and future life satisfaction, (iv) sense of control, (v) positive emotions, (vi) ego-resilience, (vii) grit, (viii) self-compassion, (ix) passion, and (x) relational mobility. All questionnaires were assessed for their suitability across the four countries with the necessary translation checks. Results from this study can be instrumental in examining the impact of multiple resilience factors and their interaction with demographic variables in shaping mental health outcomes.

Objective

As of February 2021, The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that 113 million people were infected with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with the pandemic claiming the lives of approximately 2.5 million people worldwide [1]. The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted mental health across nations. Meta-analytic evidence shows an exacerbation of mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, distress, and insomnia brought about by this unprecedented global health crisis [2].

In light of these findings, there has, however, been a proliferation of research on psychological resilience and studies examining how this important psychological ability serves as an important factor in sustaining mental health. Resilience is broadly defined as the ability to bounce back from adversity and crisis. Resilient individuals engage in effective coping that assists them in healthily adjusting to challenges and prevent them from being overwhelmed by adverse events [3]. Recent studies show that resilient individuals are able to maintain their mental health even amidst the COVID-19 pandemic [4, 5].

Psychological resilience can be broadly divided into protective and promotive factors that help individuals recover from stressful events [6, 7]. Researchers have identified a cluster of variables that serve protective and promotive effects on psychological resilience. These include ego-resilience [8,9,10], sense of control [11,12,13], positive emotions [14, 15], grit [16,17,18], self-compassion [19, 19, 21], and passion [22,23,24]. The role of psychological resilience in reducing the COVID-19-related fear can be made more apparent by assessing these variables as each distinctly contributing to psychological resilience. Further, it is likely that their relative potency in contributing to an individual’s psychological resilience will vary across contexts.

Furthermore, there are likely cultural differences that influence the degree to which psychological resilience sustains individuals’ mental health. Additional factors—namely, differences in infection status, number of infected people, infection status of family members, and the measures taken by the respective governments should be considered when assessing the underlying psychological drivers of resilience [14]. To understand possible contextual and cultural differences in psychological resilience, we conducted a web survey on these resilience factors, and their effects on mental health from October 2020 to November 2020. We sampled respondents from Japan, China, the United States (US), and Malaysia. This series of research projects is part of the Resilience to CoVid-19 in each region project (RE-COVER Project; Survey on Resilience, Mental Health, and Fear of COVID-19 in Four Countries).

Data description

The study was approved by the University of Tsukuba’s research ethics. A web survey was conducted from October 14 to November 4, 2020, using a crowdsourcing service (Japan; Crowd Works, US; Amazon Mechanical Turk) and web survey companies (China; Wen Juan Xing, Malaysia; Vase.ai.). Participants provided consent to participate in the survey and were assured that their data would be anonymized and published without identifying information. Participants received a $1-$2 monetary reward upon completion of the survey and took, on average, 25 min to complete the survey.

Data from a total of 1,583 usable responses were collected (Mean age = 32.22, SD = 12.90, Range = 19–82). The sample comprised 322 Japanese, 505 Chinese, 333 Americans, and 423 Malaysian respondents. We checked the responses and removed respondents who stated that they were under 18 years old.

We collected a wide range of demographic data, including age, sex, marital status, number of children, occupation, self-isolation status (i.e., extent to which respondents spent time indoors/outdoors), change in income (e.g., income increased), COVID-19 infection status (e.g., family member infected), place of residence, and subjective social status. Several incomplete responses were included in the final dataset given that these were data from respondents who declined to answer some free-text items and/or skipped optional questionnaire items. Even if some of the scales are not answered, other scales can be used in the analysis so that the sample size is not reduced unnecessarily. There were marginally more male respondents than female respondents (Male = 931, Female = 643, Other = 9). In the Chinese dataset, there were more students, and the mean age of respondents was moderately lower (Mean ageJapan = 38.72, Mean ageMalaysia = 32.72, Mean ageChina = 21.79, Mean ageUS = 41.47).

Depression, anxiety, and stress were assessed using the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) [25,26,27]. We also assessed for temporal life satisfaction using the 3-item Scale of Present, Past, and Future Life Satisfaction [12, 28] and fear of COVID-19 using the 7-item Fear of COVID-19 Scale [29,30,31]. Ego resilience was assessed using the 14-item Ego Resiliency Scale [810], Sense of Control with the 12-item Sense of Control Scale [11,12,13], Positive Emotions via the 38-item Dispositional Positive Emotions Scales [14, 15], Grit with the 8-item Grit scale [16,17,18], Self-compassion with the 26-item Self-Compassion Scale [19,20,21], and Passion with the 17-item Passion Scale [22,23,24]. These questionnaires assessed the resilience factors in this study. Finally, we measured relational mobility using the 12-item Relational Mobility Scale [32] as a proxy for cultural differences. The Dispositional Positive Emotions Scales and Scale of Present, Past, and Future Life Satisfaction were translated into Chinese and examined for reliability and validity. For Malaysians, we prepared questionnaires in both English and Malay.

The word file summarizes the scales and demographic descriptions used in this study. In the Excel file, the raw data of the survey and the calculated scores of the scales are summarized [33]. The items for each language of the scale used in this study are described in the source code [33] (Table 1).

Table 1 Overview of data files/data sets

Limitations

Due to the nature of cross-sectional study [33] design, it is not possible to identify a causal relationship between resilience and mental health. In addition, the sample does not include data from other regions in the world such as from Europe, Africa, and South America. As such, we could only compare the results broadly between North America and Asia. It should be noted that this is a cross-sectional data set that only includes data for respondents from October to November 2020. Since the data was obtained through an online survey, which may have caused satisfice, screening the responses would have resulted in a more accurate analysis [34]. The data also do not allow us to determine whether a person has been infected with COVID-19, and as such, we are not able to disentangle whether the effects here are due to actual experiences of being infected, or from perceived threat of infection. These questions remain avenues for further research.

Availability of data and materials

The data described in this Data note can be freely and openly accessed on Open Science Framework under Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P56GA. Please see Table 1 for details and links to the data [33].

Abbreviations

WHO:

World Health Organization

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

RE-COVER:

Resilience to CoVid-19 in each region

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) situation reports. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19---1-march-2021(2021). Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  2. 2.

    Tianchen W, Xiaoqian J, Huifeng S, Jieqiong N, Xiaohan Y, Jialei X, Xiaoli W. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;281:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1987;57:316–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kubo T, Sugawara D, Masuyama A. The effect of ego-resiliency and COVID-19-related stress on mental health among the Japanese population. Pers Individ Differ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fredrickson B, Tugade M, Waugh C, Samanez-Larkin G. What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:365–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Masten AS. Pathways to integrated resilience science. Psychol Inq. 2015;26:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ungar M. Resilience, trauma, context, and culture. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013;14:255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Block J, Kremen AM. IQ and ego resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:349–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chen X, He J, Fan X. Applicability of the Ego-Resilience Scale (ER89) in the Chinese cultural context: a validation study. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2019;38:675–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hata U, Onodera A. Development and validation of a Japanese version of the Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89). Jpn J Pers. 2013;22:37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dan Gao. How does Social Class Influence Mate Preference?一Perceived Control of Mediating Effect and Lay Theories about Social Class of Moderated Effect. Master’s thesis. Northwest Normal University. 2019

  12. 12.

    Ryff C D, Kitayama S, Karasawa M, Markus H, Kawakami N, Coe C. Survey of Midlife in Japan (MIDJA), April-September 2008. ICPSR30822-v3. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2018; https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30822.v3

  13. 13.

    Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:763–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shiota MN, Keltner D, John OP. Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with big five personality and attachment style. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1:61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sugawara D, Arimitsu K, Sugie M. Development of the Japanese version of dispositional positive emotion scales. J Health Psychol Res. 2020;33:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR. Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92:1087–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Takehashi H, Higuchi O, Ozaki Y, Watanabe T, Toyosawa J. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Grit Scale. Jpn J Psychol. 2019;89:580–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhong C, Wang MC, Shou Y, Ren F, Zhang X, Li M, Yang W. Assessing construct validity of the Grit-S in Chinese employees. PloS ONE. 2018;13:e0209319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Arimitsu K. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the self-compassion scale. Jpn J Psychol. 2014;85:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen J, Yan LS, Zhou LH. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Self-compassion Scale. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2011;19:734–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity. 2003;2:223–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kubo T, Sawamiya Y. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the passion scale. Jpn J Psychol. 2018;89:490–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhao Y, St-Louis A, Vallerand RJ. On the validation of the passion scale in Chinese. Psychol Well Being. 2015;5:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C, Mageau GA, Koestner R, Ratelle C, Léonard M, Gagné M, Marsolais J. Les passions de l’ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:756–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Antony M, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and community a sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10:176–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Moussa MT, Lovibond PF, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the short Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS21). Report for New South Wales Transcultural Mental Health Centre, Cumberland Hospital, 2001.

  27. 27.

    Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Prenda KM, Lachman ME. Planning for the future: a life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychol Aging. 2001;16:206–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chang KC, Hou WL, Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Griffiths MD. Psychometric testing of three COVID-19-related scales among people with mental illness. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00361-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Masuyama A, Kubo T, Sugawara D, Yuta C. Interest consistency can buffer the effect of COVID-19 fear on psychological distress. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00564-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yuki M, Schug J. Psychological consequences of relational mobility. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020;32:129–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sugawara D, Gu Y, Masuyama A, Ng SL, Phoo EYM, Shah RIABRR, Kubo T, et al., RE-COVER: REsilience for COVid-19 in Each Region [Data Collection], Open Science Framework https://osf.io/p56ga/

  34. 34.

    Krosnick JA. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1991;5:213–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the clerk at the University of Tsukuba (Faculty of Human Sciences), Research Administration/Management Office at U Tsukuba and all the individuals who participated in the study.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the Research Support Program to Apply the Wisdom of the University to tackle COVID-19 Related Emergency Problems (University of Tsukuba).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DS: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, visualization, writing—original draft; YG: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation resources, visualization; AM: Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, visualization; EYMP, SLN, and RIABRRS: Conceptualization, investigation, visualization, resources, writing—review & editing; TK: Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, visualization; YC: Conceptualization, investigation, visualization; EYJT: Conceptualization, investigation, validation, writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daichi Sugawara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the research ethics committee of the University of Tsukuba, Japan. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. We explained to participants on the top page of the questionnaire that the data would be published online, and obtained their consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugawara, D., Gu, Y., Masuyama, A. et al. RE-COVER project: A survey on resilience, mental health, and fear of Covid-19 in four countries. BMC Res Notes 14, 409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05819-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Resilience
  • Mental health
  • Fear of COVID-19
  • Well-being