Skip to main content
Download PDF

A synthetic ‘essentialome’ for axenic culturing of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’

BMC Research Notes volume 15, Article number: 125 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas) is associated with the devastating citrus ‘greening’ disease. All attempts to achieve axenic growth and complete Koch’s postulates with CLas have failed to date, at best yielding complex cocultures with very low CLas titers detectable only by PCR. Reductive genome evolution has rendered all pathogenic ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ spp. deficient in multiple key biosynthetic, metabolic and structural pathways that are highly unlikely to be rescued in vitro by media supplementation alone. By contrast, Liberibacter crescens (Lcr) is axenically cultured and its genome is both syntenic and highly similar to CLas. Our objective is to achieve replicative axenic growth of CLas via addition of missing culturability-related Lcr genes.

Results

Bioinformatic analyses identified 405 unique ORFs in Lcr but missing (or truncated) in all 24 sequenced CLas strains. Site-directed mutagenesis confirmed and extended published EZ-Tn5 mutagenesis data, allowing elimination of 310 of these 405 genes as nonessential, leaving 95 experimentally validated Lcr genes as essential for CLas growth in axenic culture. Experimental conditions for conjugation of large GFP-expressing plasmids from Escherichia coli to Lcr were successfully established for the first time, providing a practical method for transfer of large groups of ‘essential’ Lcr genes to CLas.

Introduction

‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ spp. are a versatile group of fastidious, Gram-negative, psyllid-transmitted and phloem-limited α-Proteobacteria (order Rhizobiales). ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ spp. have a wide host range and are associated with several plant diseases of variable economic consequence, some high enough to warrant regulatory action. Huanglongbing (HLB) or citrus ‘greening’ is associated with ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ and ‘Ca. L. americanus’ (CLas and CLam, both vectored by Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri) and ‘Ca. L. africanus’ (vectored by African citrus psyllid Trioza erytreae) [1]. Aberrant assimilate partitioning and nutrient transport leads to progressive decline in productivity and eventual death of the HLB-infected trees. Liberibacter crescens (Lcr) strain BT-1 (NC_019907.1) was originally isolated from leaf sap of a diseased Babaco Mountain papaya (Carica stipulata×C. pubescens) and has been axenically cultured in vitro [2]. Lcr BT-1 has no known plant or insect host and serves as a surrogate gene expression host and model for functional genomics of CLas [3]. Comparative metagenomic analyses suggested stepwise reductive evolution of all ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ spp. including 24 fully sequenced CLas strains (all genomes ∼ 1.2 Mb) from a common ancestor following an initial split of Lcr (1.5 Mb genome) from other Rhizobiales [4]. All attempts to fulfill Koch’s postulates or to culture CLas in axenic media have failed. Only inconsistent, transient and very low “titer” co-cultures [5,6,7,8,9] have been obtained, rendering their use impractical for most functional genomics purposes designed to understand host/pathogen/vector interactions and implement effective disease mitigation strategies.

Main text

HLB pathosystem (CLas/citrus host/psyllid vector) exists as a ‘holobiont’

CLas survival and slight growth within complex host-derived microbial communities was detected by PCR in cocultures of Ishi-1 [6] and psy62 [7, 8]. CLas strain A4 titers increased modestly in leaf disc explants incubated in the presence of glucose and the antibiotic amikacin under microaerobic conditions [10]. Li et al. [11] reported a 419-fold increase of CLas density without any corresponding increase in other citrus phloem-associated microflora in dodder (Cuscuta campestris) tendrils trained on CLas-infected citrus.

These observations indicate that the HLB pathosystem (CLas/citrus host/psyllid vector) exists as a ‘holobiont’ (host/vector with its endo- and extracellular microbiome) [12]. Metabolic and ecological interactions (mutualistic, synergistic or competitive) between the microbial community members within the HLB pathosystem are paramount for the survival of CLas with its highly reduced genome [4]. Genome reduction is a dominant mode of evolution in intracellular pathogenic/endosymbiotic bacteria, providing robust niche-specificity by virtue of increased metabolic efficiency and decreased transcriptional and regulatory costs associated with a streamlined genome [13,14,15].

Gene ‘essentiality’ is non-binary and context-specific

Peterson and Fraser [16] have argued against a universal, theoretically rigid ‘minimal genome’ or ‘essentialome’ design for achieving an autonomous self-replicating cellular unit based on gene conservation criteria across large phylogenetic distances. Mounting evidence suggests that the gene ‘essentiality’ concept is neither binary nor static and evolves [17, 18] under specific environmental and contextual genomic constraints [19, 20]. For instance, approximately one-third of the essential genes in E. coli are non-essential in Bacillus subtilis and vice versa [21]. Likewise, ~ 17% of genes considered essential in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are non-essential in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and ~ 27% of essential fission yeast genes are non-essential in the budding yeast [22]. Some ‘essential’ genes are dispensable in the context of another missing gene (or pathway) because the former might encode protective functions towards the (likely) toxic effects of the latter. For example, glyoxalase I (GloA) is a biologically fundamental and ubiquitously conserved enzyme for detoxification of methylglyoxal, a cytotoxic byproduct of glycolysis. However, absence of gloA is well tolerated in CLas because of transcriptional downregulation of glycolysis and subsequent reliance on scavenging ATP from host cells by virtue of an nttA-encoded ATP/ADP translocase present in the uncultured pathogenic ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ spp. [23].

Successful axenic culturing of CLas requires a synthetic ‘essentialome’

Genomic and metabolic pathway comparisons between Lcr and all pathogenic ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ spp. revealed a trend for the reduction or complete absence of multiple biosynthetic pathways, metabolic enzymes and secretion systems consistent with their intracellular lifestyle [4]. Even though the genomes of Lcr and pathogenic ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ spp. are highly similar and microsyntenic [2, 4], the core Liberibacter genomes share only 658 genes, and most of the species-specific genes encode hypothetical proteins. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that 37% of the functionally annotated genes in the Lcr genome are species-specific in comparison to only 17% in CLas and 9% in CLam [24].

Based on genome scale metabolic modeling and large-scale gene ‘essentiality’ data sets across 79 bacterial and archaeal domains, the ‘essentiality’ patterns cluster together phylogenetically in silico as well as experimentally at the metabolic pathway level [25]. It is therefore axiomatic that the genes validated as ‘essential’ for Lcr growth in vitro [23, 26,27,28,29] but absent in CLas, are likely indispensable for maintaining CLas in replicative cultures. Under this premise, unique gene loci in Lcr were identified using a custom Perl script and reciprocal blasts implemented in the OrthoMCL software [30] at e-value cut offs of < 3e–30 and < 40% identity. Functional annotation by InterProScan [31] and Prokka [32] revealed 405 unique ORFs (including 104 hypothetical proteins) in Lcr that were missing in all sequenced strains of pathogenic Liberibacters (Additional File 1). Out of these, 120 ORFs (81 annotated and 39 hypothetical proteins) were completely absent (Additional File 2) whereas 286 ORFs (221 annotated and 65 hypothetical proteins) were truncated in the genomes of all sequenced CLas strains. Classification of the 302 annotated ‘essential’ genes of Lcr into Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) is presented in Fig. 1. Notably, a relatively high percentage of these were involved in membrane or envelope biogenesis and partitioning. Tan et al. [33] very recently reported a similar number (323) of COGs unique to Lcr using very different methodology.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Metabolic/physiological and structural differences between cultured, non-pathogenic Liberibacter crescens and uncultured, pathogenic ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’. Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) analysis reveals functions encoded by 302 L. crescens genes that are either (A) completely absent (81 genes) or (B) truncated (221 genes) in all ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ genomes sequenced to date

Full size image

The ‘essentiality’ of 405 genes for Lcr growth was validated by targeted site-directed marker interruption [3] and compared with previously published EZ-Tn5 transposon mutagenesis dataset [27]. EZ-Tn5 mutagenesis data were also manually examined to determine if the location of the Tn5 insertions within each ORF likely affected the expression of the predicted conserved domains in the ORF, either by polar effects or by direct disruption. Some Tn5 insertions occurring in the terminal 20% of the 3ʹ region of the target ORF and outside of known functional protein domains were considered not likely to produce a mutated phenotype [34] and were experimentally validated by multiple failed knockout attempts, as were observed for Lcr glyoxalase (gloA) [23] and Kdo2-lipid IVA lauroyltransferase (lpxXL) [28, 29] genes. Out of the 405 unique Lcr genes, 310 were eliminated in this study as being likely non-essential, leaving 95 genes (65 annotated and 30 hypothetical proteins) that were either ‘essential’ or quasi-essential for Lcr growth (Additional File 3).

Nutrient reprieve alone is likely insufficient for axenic growth of CLas

Large-scale computational metabolic modeling identified 372 genes driving 892 metabolic reactions involving 887 metabolites in Lcr BT-1. By comparison, only 253–285 genes, driving 814–840 reactions and producing 802–837 metabolites were identified in six different CLas strains [35]. In addition to 109 unique metabolic reactions present in Lcr, ~ 30% of the Lcr-specific reactions were associated with the cell envelope and missing in all sequenced CLas strains [35]. All CLas strains were predicted to be more heavily dependent on additional metabolites, carbohydrates, nucleotides, amino acids and vitamins, and also exhibited marked deficiencies in cell envelope biogenesis, consistent with several lines of published empirical evidence [23, 28, 29, 36].

Of the 95 culturability-related ‘essential’ genes of Lcr, 30 encoded hypothetical proteins with unknown function (Additional File 3) and without sequence similarity to any prokaryotic or eukaryotic proteins discoverable by BLASTP in GenBank (Additional File 4). Ten of the 30 hypothetical proteins were predicted to be secreted either via classical [37, 38] or noncanonical [39] secretion pathways and eight proteins were predicted to be membrane localized integral proteins [40] (Additional File 3). The smallest synthetic bacterial genome of Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn3.0 (531 kb, 473 protein-coding and 35 RNA genes) contained 84 genes that were involved in the maintenance of cell envelope and 149 genes encoding proteins with unknown biological function [34, 41].

We also analyzed the genomes of 17 uncultured bacterial species, including plant and animal pathogens and insect endosymbionts, for the presence of orthologs of all 95 ‘essential’ Lcr genes (Additional File 4). Notably, 49 of the 95 predicted to be required for axenic growth had no orthologs in any of these bacteria, while the remaining 46 had orthologs scattered in one or more of these uncultured bacterial genomes (Table 1). These results support our hypothesis that host-free and autonomous axenic growth of CLas can only be achieved via simultaneous addition of multiple Lcr genes identified as ‘essential’, and not by media additives or manipulation of axenic growth conditions alone.

Table 1 Frequency of ortholog occurrence of annotated ‘essential’ Lcr genes in 13 selected uncultured bacteria
Full size table

Conjugation of culturability-related ‘essential’ genes to transient cultures of CLas

Highly efficient, cost-effective and seamless gene synthesis and assembly platforms such as Gibson, Golden Gate and paper-clip assembly etc. [42] and advanced genetic engineering tools [43] have yielded workflows resulting in synthetic, minimal and self-replicative bacterial and yeast genomes [44]. We envisage a similar, albeit less complex and bottom up, approach for conjugal transfer of the 95 culturability-related ‘essential’ Lcr genes (under the control of their native promoters) to CLas. Bacterial conjugation is an energy-driven unidirectional DNA transfer process requiring physical contact between donor and recipient cells. Cell-to-cell contact signals the donor bacteria for mating bridge formation and DNA transfer that is largely independent of the size of transferred DNA [45]. Both the transient (co)cultures of CLas [6, 9] or host-free CLas containing mixed biofilms [7, 8] can be potentially used as recipients, as biofilms are known to facilitate conjugation [46].

Experimental conditions and counter selection methods for conjugation of large plasmids expressing green florescent protein (GFP) [47] from E. coli to Lcr BT-1 were successfully accomplished for the first time and are summarized in Fig. 2. A broad-host range pUFR071 [48] derived E. coli/Lcr shuttle plasmid pCLL031 was transferred via conjugation from E. coli strain TOP10 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) to Lcr, using E.coli strain HB101 (Promega, Madison, WI) carrying the conjugative plasmid pRK24 [49] as helper. Phenotypic microarray plate (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA) assays identified lemoefloxacin (6 μg /ml) as an effective counter selection antibiotic for the recovery of Lcr exoconjugants following mating with E. coli on BM7 medium [2]. Gentamicin (2.0 μg/ml) [3] was used for the selection of pCLL031 in Lcr exoconjugants. Simulated growth modeling, accounting for the connectivity of carbon and nitrogen sources, amino acids and vitamins across physiological networks predicted that the Lcr culture medium BM7 was also optimal for in vitro growth of CLas [35]. Alternatively, modified BM7 medium (BM7A) may also be used for recovery of CLas transconjugants. BM7A medium, with increased buffering capacity and reduced medium alkalization, resulted in 1000-fold improved recovery of ‘viable and culturable’ Lcr cells from 10-day-old cultures [3, 50].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental design for genetic transformation of Liberibacter crescens (Lcr) via E. coli conjugation. A Lomefloxacin effectively suppressed growth of E. coli at all the concentrations (2–12.5 μg/ml) tested with no inhibitory effect on Lcr growth (at 2–10 μg/ml). Iodonitrotetrazolium chloride forms a purple formazan dye on reduction indicative of cell growth and viability in a microplate assay. B The broad-host range mobilizable plasmid pCLL031 is a derivative of pURF071 (RepW, ColE1, Mob+, lacZ, Par+, CmR, GmR) containing genes encoding green florescent protein (GFP) driven by a constitutive tryptophan promoter, and glyoxalase A (gloA, B488_RS02175), Kdo2-lipid IVA lauroyltransferase (lpxXL, B488_RS04675) and acyl carrier protein (acpXL, B488_RS04700) with their native promoters. The genotypes of the E. coli strains used for conjugation are, HB101 (helper): F- mcrB mrr hsdS20 (rB−, mB−) recA13 supE44 ara14 galK2 lacY1 proA2 rpsL20 (SmR) xy15 λ− leu mtl1; and TOP10 (donor): F-mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) Φ80lacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 recA1 araD139 Δ(ara leu)7697 galU galK rpsL (StrR) endA1 nupG. C–D 4 μl aliquots of overnight cultures (Abs600 = 1.0) of helper (HB101) and donor (TOP10) E. coli strains were sequentially spotted on top of a 5-day-old 3 ml Lcr culture pellet and cocultured for 8–12 h at 28 °C. E–F The coculture mix was streaked on selective BM7 plates (6 μg/ml lomefloxacin and 2 μg/ml gentamycin) for 12 weeks, and the Lcr exoconjugants were verified for the presence of mobilized pCLL031 by restriction digestion analysis and GFP expression

Full size image

Conclusions

Currently, 97% of 14,000 cultured bacterial species (across 3500 genera and 38 phyla) belong to just four bacterial phyla (Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria), but the vast majority remain poorly characterized in vitro [51]. Several bacteria with reduced genomes have remained recalcitrant to axenic growth in vitro, likely because of (a) metabolic deficiencies that cannot be relieved by media supplementation alone, (b) novel regulatory networks that are needed for optimum gene expression and (c) additional genes that required for essential structural, membrane barrier and unknown functions for in vitro growth. Global mutagenesis datasets and modeling of regulatory and metabolic networks in phylogenetically related culturable species can provide valuable insights into gene ‘essentiality’ functions and bottom-up implementation of specific synthetic ‘essentialomes’ for axenic culturing of economically important pathogens with reduced genomes such as CLas.

Limitations

Successful axenic culturing of CLas will likely require transfer and expression of a complete set of at least 95 Lcr genes, all of which are simultaneously required. Efforts are underway to obtain a comparative high density transcriptomic roadmap of Lcr and CLas to better understand (a) previously uncharacterized gene regulatory networks and (b) the significance of large numbers of species-specific hypothetical proteins of unknown function present in both the Lcr and CLas genomes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

CLas:

‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’

Clam:

‘Ca. L. americanus’

Lcr:

L. crescens

References

  1. Gottwald TR. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus huanglongbing. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:119–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leonard MT, Fagen JR, Davis-Richardson AG, Davis MJ, Triplett EW. Complete genome sequence of Liberibacter crescens BT-1. Stand Genom Sci. 2012;7:271–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain M, Cai L, Fleites LA, Munoz-Bodnar A, Davis MJ, Gabriel DW. Liberibacter crescens is a cultured surrogate for functional genomics of uncultured pathogenic ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ spp. and is naturally competent for transformation. Phytopathol. 2019;109:1811–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thapa SP, De Francesco A, Trinh J, Gurung FB, Pang Z, Vidalakis G, Wang N, Ancona V, Ma W, Coaker G. Genome-wide analyses of Liberibacter species provides insights into evolution, phylogenetic relationships, and virulence factors. Mol Plant Pathol. 2020;21:716–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Merfa MV, Pérez-López E, Naranjo E, Jain M, Gabriel DW, De La Fuente L. Progress and obstacles in culturing ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, the bacterium associated with Huanglongbing. Phytopathol. 2019;109:1092–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujiwara K, Iwanami T, Fujikawa T. Alterations of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’-associated microbiota decrease survival of ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ in in vitro assays. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3089.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ha PT, He R, Killiny N, Brown JK, Omsland A, Gang DR, Beyenal H. Host-free biofilm culture of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”, the bacterium associated with Huanglongbing. Biofilm. 2019;1:100005.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Molki B, Call DR, Ha PT, Omsland A, Gang DR, Lindemann SR, Killiny N, Beyenal H. Growth of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in a host-free microbial culture is associated with microbial community composition. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2020;142:109691.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Merfa MV, Naranjo E, Shantharaj D, De La Fuente L. Growth of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in commercial grapefruit juice-based media formulations reveals common cell density-dependent transient behaviors. Phytopathol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-21-0228-FI.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Attaran E, Berim A, Killiny N, Beyenal H, Gang DR, Omsland A. Controlled replication of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ DNA in citrus leaf discs. Microb Biotechnol. 2020;13:747–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li T, Zhang L, Deng Y, Deng X, Zheng Z. Establishment of a Cuscuta campestris-mediated enrichment system for genomic and transcriptomic analyses of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14:737–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome. 2018;6:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution. BioEssays. 2013;35:829–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hessen DO, Jeyasingh PD, Neiman M, Weider LJ. Genome streamlining and the elemental costs of growth. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:75–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pósfai G, Plunkett G, Fehér T, Frisch D, Keil GM, Umenhoffer K, Kolisnychenko V, Stahl B, Sharma SS, De Arruda M, Burland V. Emergent properties of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. Science. 2006;312:1044–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peterson SN, Fraser CM. The complexity of simplicity. Genome Biol. 2001;2:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rancati G, Moffat J, Typas A, Pavelka N. Emerging and evolving concepts in gene essentiality. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rees-Garbutt J, Chalkley O, Landon S, Purcell O, Marucci L, Grierson C. Designing minimal genomes using whole-cell models. Nat Commun. 2020;11:836.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sassetti CM, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ. Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. Mol Microbio. 2003;48:77–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Akerley BJ, Rubin EJ, Novick VL, Amaya K, Judson N, Mekalanos JJ. A genome-scale analysis for identification of genes required for growth or survival of Haemophilus influenzae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:966–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Koo BM, Kritikos G, Farelli JD, Todor H, Tong K, Kimsey H, Wapinski I, Galardini M, Cabal A, Peters JM, Hachmann AB. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst. 2017;4:291–305.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim DU, Hayles J, Kim D, Wood V, Park HO, Won M, Yoo HS, Duhig T, Nam M, Palmer G, Han S. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:617–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jain M, Munoz-Bodnar A, Gabriel DW. Concomitant loss of the glyoxalase system and glycolysis makes the uncultured pathogen “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” an energy scavenger. App Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e01670-e1617.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wulff NA, Zhang S, Setubal JC, Almeida NF, Martins EC, Harakava R, Kumar D, Rangel LT, Foissac X, Bové JM, Gabriel DW. The complete genome sequence of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter americanus’ associated with citrus Huanglongbing. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014;27:163–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xavier JC, Patil KR, Rocha I. Metabolic models and gene essentiality data reveal essential and conserved metabolism in prokaryotes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1006556.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fagen JR, Leonard MT, McCullough CM, Edirisinghe JN, Henry CS, Davis MJ, Triplett EW. Comparative genomics of cultured and uncultured strains suggests genes essential for free-living growth of Liberibacters. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e84469.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lai KK, Davis-Richardson AG, Dias R, Triplett EW. Identification of the genes required for the culture of Liberibacter crescens, the closest cultured relative of the Liberibacter plant pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:547.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Black IM, Heiss C, Jain M, Muszyński A, Carlson RW, Gabriel DW, Azadi P. Structure of lipopolysaccharide from Liberibacter crescens is low molecular weight and offers insight into ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ biology. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:11240.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jain M, Cai L, Black IM, Azadi P, Carlson RW, Jones KM, Gabriel DW. ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’-encoded BCP peroxiredoxin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-mediated defense signaling and nitrosative stress in planta. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-21-0230-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan Y, Wang C, Schneider T, Li H, de Souza RF, Tang X, Swisher Grimm K, Hsieh TF, Wang X, Li X, Zhang D. Comparative phylogenomic analysis reveals evolutionary genomic changes and novel toxin families in endophytic Liberibacter pathogens. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9:e00509-e521.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hutchison CA, Chuang RY, Noskov VN, Assad-Garcia N, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, Gill J, Kannan K, Karas BJ, Ma L, Pelletier JF. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science. 2016;351:6280.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zuñiga C, Peacock B, Liang B, McCollum G, Irigoyen SC, Tec-Campos D, Marotz C, Weng NC, Zepeda A, Vidalakis G, Mandadi KK. Linking metabolic phenotypes to pathogenic traits among “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” and its hosts. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2020;6:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cai L, Jain M, Sena-Vélez M, Jones KM, Fleites LA, Heck M, Gabriel DW. Tad pilus-mediated twitching motility is essential for DNA uptake and survival in all Liberibacters. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0258583.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;2011(8):785–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bagos PG, Tsirigos KD, Liakopoulos TD, Hamodrakas SJ. Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in gram-positive bacteria with a hidden markov model. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:5082–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bendtsen JD, Jensen LJ, Blom N, Von Heijne G, Brunak S. Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004;2004(17):349–56.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Krogh A, Larsson B, Von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Antczak M, Michaelis M, Wass MN. Environmental conditions shape the nature of a minimal bacterial genome. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hughes RA, Ellington AD. Synthetic DNA synthesis and assembly: putting the synthetic in synthetic biology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9:a023812.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ren J, Lee J, Na D. Recent advances in genetic engineering tools based on synthetic biology. J Microbiol. 2020;58:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang W, Mitchell LA, Bader JS, Boeke JD. Synthetic genomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89:77–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Waksman G. From conjugation to T4S systems in Gram-negative bacteria: a mechanistic biology perspective. EMBO Rep. 2019;20:e47012.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Stalder T, Top E. Plasmid transfer in biofilms: a perspective on limitations and opportunities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2016(2):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Callaway EM, Jones JB, Wilson M. Visualisation of hrp gene expression in Xanthomonas euvesicatoria in the tomato phyllosphere. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2009;124:379–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. De Feyter R, Gabriel DW. Use of cloned DNA methylase genes to increase the frequency of transfer of foreign genes into Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:6421–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ma NJ, Moonan DW, Isaacs FJ. Precise manipulation of bacterial chromosomes by conjugative assembly genome engineering. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:2285–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sena-Vélez M, Holland SD, Aggarwal M, Cogan NG, Jain M, Gabriel DW, Jones KM. Growth dynamics and survival of Liberibacter crescens BT-1, an important model organism for the citrus huanglongbing pathogen “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”. App Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e01656-e1719.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lewis WH, Tahon G, Geesink P, Sousa DZ, Ettema TJ. Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:225–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Patricia A. Rayside for excellent technical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Specialty Crops Research Initiative (NIFA-SCRI) grant #2016-70016-24844 to DWG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Lulu Cai, Mukesh Jain, Alejandra Munoz-Bodnar, Jose C. Huguet-Tapia & Dean W. Gabriel

Authors
  1. Lulu Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mukesh Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alejandra Munoz-Bodnar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jose C. Huguet-Tapia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dean W. Gabriel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LC and MJ conducted the experiments. AMB and JHT performed the bioinformatic analyses. DWG provided supervision and resources. MJ and DWG conceptualized the project and wrote the manuscript. The corresponding author is DWG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean W. Gabriel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

405 unique ORFs present in the genome of Liberibacter crescens but either absent (or truncated) in all sequenced ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ strains. Genes validated to be essential for growth of L. crescens in culture are indicated by asterisk (*).

Additional file 2:

120 unique ORFs present in the genome of L. crescens that are absent in the genomes of all sequenced ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ strains.

Additional file 3:

Culturability-related ‘essential’ L. crescens genes encoding hypothetical proteins that are either secreted or are membrane localized.

Additional file 4:

Survey of 95 culturability-related ‘essential’ genes of Liberibacter crescens for homologs present in the genomes of 13 economically/medically important uncultured bacteria. Among the 65 annotated genes, 19 genes had no homologs in any of these bacteria.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, L., Jain, M., Munoz-Bodnar, A. et al. A synthetic ‘essentialome’ for axenic culturing of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. BMC Res Notes 15, 125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05986-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05986-5

Keywords

  • ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ spp.
  • Citrus greening
  • Conjugation
  • Huanglongbing
  • Liberibacter crescens
  • Minimal genome
  • Essentialome

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us