Skip to main content

A first voice perspective of people experiencing homelessness on preferences for the end-of-life and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Objective

People experiencing homelessness often encounter progressive illness(es) earlier and are at increased risk of mortality compared to the housed population. There are limited resources available to serve this population at the end-of-life (EOL). The purpose of this study was to gain insight into preferences for the EOL and end-of-life care for people experiencing homelessness. Utilizing an interpretive phenomenology methodology and the theoretical lens of critical social theory, we present results from 3 participants interviewed from August to October 2020, with current or previous experience of homelessness and a diagnosis of advanced disease/progressive life-threatening illness.

Results

A key finding focused on the existential struggle experienced by the participants in that they did not care if they lived or died. The participants described dying alone as a bad or undignified way to die and instead valued an EOL experience that was without suffering, surrounded by those who love them, and in a familiar place, wherever that may be. This study serves to highlight the need for improvements to meet the health care and social justice needs of people experiencing homelessness by ensuring equitable, humanistic health and end-of-life care, particularly during the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction

People experiencing homelessness are at an increased risk of mortality, with the mean age of death being 34–47 years in Canada [1,2,3]. Eight out of 10 people who experience homelessness also experience chronic and/or progressive health conditions including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, tuberculosis, cancer, and HIV/AIDS [3]. Unintentional injuries, hypothermia, heatstroke, alcohol, and drug overdose are also prevalent among this population [3, 4].

People experiencing homelessness are profoundly stigmatized which furthers the adverse health outcomes and unmet needs for this population, including difficulties in accessing healthcare and receiving a lower standard of care than the general population [5, 6]. People experiencing homelessness along with concurrent disorders, such as mental health issues and substance use disorders, are particularly disadvantaged as they face barriers to healthcare services, high rates of hospitalization and discrimination from healthcare providers [7, 8].

Access to high quality end-of-life care (EOLC) is a basic human right [9]. Although relatively little research has been done regarding EOLC services for people experiencing homelessness, there is high demand for EOLC for this population [2, 4, 10, 11]. Yet, EOLC services are underused among this population [12, 13] due to inexperience or lack of education for healthcare workers, stigma within the healthcare system, and mistrust between healthcare professionals and people experiencing homelessness [1, 2, 13,14,15]. In many institutions, zero tolerance policies exist, prohibiting the use of alcohol and other substances which makes care inaccessible for many people [16, 17]. Moreover, there are limited resources available that specifically serve the multifaceted EOLC needs for this population [9, 15,16,17]. It is not surprising that people experiencing homelessness avoid EOLC [17].

While there is a growing body of knowledge on this topic, few studies have been conducted from the perspective of people experiencing homelessness and living with a progressive life limiting illness and many studies rely on evidence from health and social service providers. In one relevant systematic review, only 4 of 9 included studies included any data collected from people experiencing homelessness [14]. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into preferences for the EOL and EOLC from people experiencing homelessness.

Main text

Methods

Data collection

Semi-structured telephone interviews [18] of approximately one hour were audio recorded by the first author who then created a verbatim transcript enhanced with notes to document behaviors such as silence and laughter. The interview guide was developed for this study (see Additional file 1).

Setting and recruitment

After receiving research ethics board approval, the first author contacted services in the Halifax Regional Municipality in Nova Scotia, Canada, by telephone or email that served people experiencing homelessness (e.g., a street navigator). For those who provided authorization, the first author sent a recruitment poster including study details and contact information. Potential participants contacted the first author via telephone, and they were screened for the following eligibility criteria: ability to speak and understand English; over the age of 18; access to a phone; current or previous experience of homelessness; a diagnosis of advanced disease/progressive life-threatening illness (e.g., COPD, cancer, HIV/AIDS, substance addiction); and the cognitive capacity to consent to participating in the study. Once eligibility was established and any questions about the study were answered, informed consent was obtained. Participants received a $25 honorarium.

Interviews with three people were conduced from August-October 2020, which was reasonable given recruitment challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Having a small sample size is an advantage to understand the richness and depth of lived experiences.

Data analysis

We used an inductive thematic analysis approach [19] involving reflective writing and the stages of identifying an early focus and lines of inquiry, central concerns, exemplars and paradigm cases, shared meaning, and final interpretations. [19]. Pseudonyms protected participant’s privacy and humanized their stories.

Research rigor was ensured in various ways. Draft themes were identified by the first author and discussed with the last author throughout the data analysis process. While space is limited in this report, we provided descriptions and quotes which supports the transferability of the findings [20]. A reflexive journal was kept throughout the entire study to examine personal awareness, assumptions, and biases and to create a level of transparency [21].

Results

The participants

The participants included two males and one female whose ages ranged from 36 to 60.

“Nate” lived in an assisted living environment for those with chronic alcohol dependency; previously he stayed at various shelters. During the COVID-19 pandemic he was sheltered in a gymnasium and then provided with a hotel room by a local non-profit organization. “Lilli” and “Darcy” were involved romantically, and they were living in a tent prior to being provided a hotel room for a few weeks. They were unsure of their living situation following the interview.

Nate had many health conditions including chronic alcoholism, high blood pressure, and mental health issues. Lilli was a former Licenced Practical Nurse was diagnosed with Stage 3 stomach cancer, depression, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and she struggled with addictions. Lilli had explored medically assisted dying. Darcy struggled with post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, addictions, and untreated seizures.

Existential struggle

Each participant experienced an existential struggle related to death. Nate voiced that he did not care if he lived or died because he felt that he had nothing meaningful left. “I don’t really care if I live or die; it’s all gone, there’s nothing left of me. So I don’t really care about life or death. I don’t care if I get Corona. There’s nothing left for me. My life is all gone. My good life is all gone.” Lilli thought about dying when she experienced pain and during the time of her stomach cancer diagnosis; she didn`t want to get sicker but also didn`t care if she got better: “About passing away? Sometimes if I am having a shitty day, if I’m having a bad day ya know, it makes me think if I have to struggle like this so bad and be in so much pain what is the point of still carrying on.” Darcy`s voiced that dying in a violent manner or dying in general is something that he thought about “all the time.”

I don’t want to suffer

The participants described suffering to be the epitome of what constitutes a “bad” death, such as suffering related to a cancer diagnosis, dying by suicide, or in a tragic or violent way. In the past, the participants encountered traumatizing acts of violence and have lost acquaintances through the act of suicide which impacted their perceptions of undignified deaths. Darcy voiced that “A bad death would be getting hurt or murdered or anything like that or getting hit by a car. Ya know that would be a bad death to me.” The participants also voiced their ideal EOL situation would involve just going to sleep and not waking up or to grow old and die without suffering.

I want to die at home, wherever that may be

This theme explores the uniqueness of dying at home as a desire for those whom others may view as being ‘without’ a home. Home may be a shelter, tent or park bench, but the act of dying at home remains a relevant desire and preference. The support needed to die comfortably at home can be intensive and requires access to many services such as palliative and home care, which can create a barrier for dying at home for people experiencing homelessness. For example, Lilli explained: “Yea I would want to be at home, I wouldn’t want to be in assisted living or a hospital or anything like that, I’d rather just be at home; Yea I don’t want to go in like palliative care and have people that I don’t know looking after me.’

Surrounded by those who love me

The participants voiced the importance of being surrounded by loved ones. Lilli explained that “a bad death would be passing away by myself and not having my family with me.” Darcy voiced how he had lost ties with his family, but he has been encouraged by Lilli to reunite with them. Despite the potential to reunite with family, Darcy voiced that he would not want them present in an EOL situation. He said: “No I`d just want her.”

Dying without ‘nothing’

Dying without ‘nothing’ was identified as a particular concern by Nate. He indicated how he perceived his current quality of life as being poor. Feeling like there was nothing of value left in his life, whether that be his health or financial means was a central concern regarding his attitude and beliefs surrounding EOL. “That’s a bad death, dying asleep and not waking up, dying without nothing.”

Discussion

This results of this study are important in that it is among one of a small number to explore preferences for EOL and EOLC from the perspective of people experiencing homelessness and living with progressive illness(es) [10, 16, 17]. In addition, as the interviews were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the results provide insights into the unique challenges experienced by people experiencing homelessness during this difficult time.

A key finding focused on existential struggle experienced by the participants in that they did not care if they lived or died. Their struggle was related to their thoughts about dying and the dying process, as well as the perceived lack of meaning or purpose in their lives. Little is known about the existential struggle of people experiencing homelessness, and especially among those in EOL situations [22]. Our results indicate that there is need to explore how to provide person-centered care including mental, spiritual, and psychosocial care for people living with progressive illness(es) in an EOL context. While there are established standards developed for training for professionals working in palliative care on specific topics, such as spiritual care [23], this training should also encompass the needs of people experiencing homelessness. In addition, efforts are needed to help people experiencing homelessness to have confidence in health care providers and be treated with equality and respect [24].

It was evident that suffering, dying alone and ‘without nothing’ were central concerns. These concerns are heightened for people experiencing homelessness. The participants identified a “good” death, or an ideal EOL situation, would be dying in one’s sleep, without pain or suffering and surrounded by those who loved them. These results are supported by the small body of literature available that looks at important aspects of EOLC for those experiencing homelessness. According to the literature, the discourse that has been identified surrounding what constitutes a “good” death, or ideal EOL situation for this population include: the desire for a peaceful death that is without pain or suffering, making a spiritual or religious connection, making amends with family and friends, and seeking reconciliation or taking care of inner conflicts [25,26,27].

Our results also highlight the importance of broadening the definition of family as EOL caregiver. For some people experiencing homelessness, “family” may be non-traditional (e.g., street family, shelter workers, street navigators). Stajduhar and colleagues recommend challenging the assumptions and policies that prevent non-traditional family from caring for their loved ones at the EOL [11]. In addition, for people experiencing homelessness, the provision of care at the EOL at home may include a shelter, tent, or park bench. It is clear that the limited resources are not adequate to meet the needs of people experiencing homelessness a the EOL [10, 16, 17].

The findings have the potential to inform the education and practice of healthcare providers in various settings. However, to implement findings into upstream health systems planning, there is a need for additional research that includes feasibility data, such as large scale qualitative or quantitative studies, that can prove the need for specialized homelessness EOLC services at a local level. The voice of people experiencing homelessness should be at the forefront of any new initiatives to ensure plans are effective and serve to strengthen outreach and engagement efforts [28].

Limitations

Recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic was particularly challenging. The small sample size limits transferability of the findings [13].Two of the participants in this study were involved in a romantic relationship and living together at the time of interviewing.

Availability of data and materials

The data analysed during this study are not publicly available as the qualitative data may be identifiable. Questions about access to deidentified data should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

EOL:

End-of-life

EOLC:

End-of-life care

References

  1. Argintaru N, Chambers C, Gogosis E, Farrell S, Palepu A, Klodawsky F, Hwang S. Cross-sectional observational study of unmet health needs among homeless and vulnerably housed adults in three Canadian cities. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Health Canada. Certain Circumstances: issues in equity and responsiveness. Government of Canada. 2018. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/hcs-sss/alt_formats/hpb-dgps/pdf/pubs/2001-certain-equit-acces/2001-certain-equit-acces-eng.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2020.

  3. Hwang SW. Homelessness and health. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;164(2):229–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Canadian Observatory on Homelessness. Homeless Hub 10 years, making research matter. Canadian Population Health Initiative of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2017. http://homelesshub.ca/community-profiles/nova-scotia/halifax. Accessed 5 Nov 2020.

  5. Health Care for the Homeless Clinicians’ Network. Adapting your practice: recommendations for end-of-life care for people experiencing homelessness. 2018. https://nhchc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2018-end-of-life-care-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2020.

  6. Melnitzer SB. Marginalization and the homeless: a prescriptive analysis. J Soc Distress Homeless. 2007;16(3):193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bevan J, Senn-Reeves J, Inventor B, Greiner S, Mayer K, Rivard M, Hamilton R. Critical social theory approach to disclosure of genomic incidental findings. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19(6):819–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burt M, Aron LY, Lee E, Valente J. Helping America’s homeless: emergency shelter or affordable housing? Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brennan F. Palliative care as an international human right. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33(5):494–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corfu N. When it comes to end-of-life care, options for Halifax’s homeless are few. CBC news. 2018. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/homeless-dying-halifax-hospital-shelter-hospice-end-of-life-palliative-care-1.4493230. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  11. Stajduhar K, Mollison A. Too little, too late: how we fail vulnerable Canadians as they die and what to do about it. 2018. https://www.uvic.ca/research/groups/peol/assets/docs/too-little-too-late.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2020.

  12. Davis-Berman J. Serious illness and end-of-life care in the homeless: examining a service system and a call for action for social work. Soc Work Soc. 2016;14(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Webb W, Mitchell T, Nyatanga B, Snelling P. ‘Who cares and what matters?’: exploring end of life priorities of homeless adults in the UK. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7(3):A363.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hudson BF, Flemming K, Shulman C, Candy B. Challenges to access and provision of palliative care for people who are homeless: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15(1):96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McNaughton C. Transitions through homelessness, substance use, and the effect of material marginalization and psychological trauma. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2008;15(2):177–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hudson BF, Shulman C, Low J, Hewett N, Daley J, Davis S, Brophy N, Howard D, Vivat B, Kennedy P, Stone P. Challenges to discussing palliative care with people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e017502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. MacKenzie M, Purkey E. Barriers to end-of-life services for persons experiencing homelessness as perceived by health and social service providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32(6):847–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crist JD, Tanner CA. Interpretation/analysis methods in hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nurs Res. 2003;52(3):202–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benner P. Interpretive phenomenology: embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ortlipp M. Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):695–705.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boston P, Bruce A, Schreiber R. Existential suffering in the palliative care setting: an integrated literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(3):604–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Best M, Leget C, Goodhead A, Paal P. An EAPC white paper on multi-disciplinary education for spiritual care in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(9):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Veer AJE, Stringer B, Van Meijel B, Verkaik R, Francke AL. Access to palliative care for homeless people: complex lives, complex care. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):684–1472.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ko E, Kwak J, Nelson-Becker H. What constitutes a good and bad death?: perspectives of homeless older adults. Death Stud. 2015;39(7):422–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song J, Ratner ER, Bartels DM, Alderton L, Hudson B, Ahluwalia JS. Experiences with and attitudes toward death and dying among homeless persons. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:427–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tarzian A, Neal M, O’Neil J. Attitudes, experiences, and beliefs affecting end-of-life decision-making among homeless individuals. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):36–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidance on people experiencing unsheltered homelessness. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/homeless-shelters/vaccination-guidance.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. Brenda Sabo for her contributions to the early phases of this research project. Additionally, the authors would like to sincerely thank the participants in this study, sharing your stories took utmost bravery. This project is for you, by you.

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by a grant from The Nursing Research and Development Fund, School of Nursing, Dalhousie University. The funder had no role in the design of the study, data collection, data analysis, or interpretation of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CV designed and implemented this study, as well as analyzed and interpreted the participant data, under the guidance of thesis supervisor LW, and thesis committee members JH and JK. VR made a substantial contribution through drafting the manuscript. All authors were involved in the revision of the manuscript. All authors have agreed to be personally accountable for their own contributions and to the accuracy and integrity of the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori E. Weeks.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the Dalhousie University Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Board (2019-5031). As the study was conducted during COVID, for safety reasons for both the interviewer and the vulnerable participants, we conducted the interviews by telephone and the participants provided informed consent orally prior to being interviewed.

Consent for publication

Individual participants provided consent for deidentified quotes from their interviews to be included in any dissemination of the results.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Semi-structured interview guide.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vihvelin, C., Rupasinghe, V., Hughes, J. et al. A first voice perspective of people experiencing homelessness on preferences for the end-of-life and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Res Notes 15, 142 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06025-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06025-z

Keywords

  • Homelessness
  • Palliative
  • End-of-life
  • Death
  • Dying
  • COVID-19