Skip to main content
Download PDF

Ion content, antioxidant enzyme activity and transcriptional response under salt stress and recovery condition in the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis

BMC Research Notes volume 15, Article number: 201 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

In contrast to glycophytes, halophyte plants have evolved unique morphological and physiological mechanisms to deal with abiotic stress. This study presents the physiological responses of Aeluropus littoralis, a halophyte grass, to salt stress and recovery conditions on the molecular level.

Results

Elemental analysis showed that Na+ concentration increased in the analyzed tissue during salt stress application, and declined at recovery condition. With the exception of root tissue, comparable trends of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations were observed (decreased during salt stress, increased during recovery). Salinity led to an increase in total chlorophyll (Chl), Chl a, and carotenoids content, while Chl b content decreased. The level of the proline amino acid associated with drought and salt stress was increased. Here APX, POD, and SOD activity were strongly detectable in roots and reduced later under recovery conditions. RT-qPCR revealed up-regulation of antioxidant genes at S1 and S3 in the root but down-regulation in recovery conditions. This study found a significant halophyte index for understanding the processes of salinity tolerance in A. littoralis. These findings may provide insight into the role of antioxidant enzymes during salt stress and the mechanism underlying the plant's response to stress.

Introduction

In modern agriculture, salt stress is one of the most important abiotic stressors that threatens crop growth and development [1]. Due to increasing global demand for food, agricultural expansion to salt-affected areas is inevitable [2]. Therefore, the development of salinity tolerant crops is crucial for global food security [3, 4]. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to understand the effects of high salinity on plant morphology, physiological processes, biochemical and metabolic responses, as well as gene expression [5, 6].

Halophytes represent an interesting example of a stress-tolerant plant [7, 8]. Halophytic plants have evolved a diverse set of adaptation strategies and tolerance mechanisms to survive in most extreme saline habitats [1, 9]. Crop improvement in terms of salinity and drought tolerance necessitates the application of halophyte research findings [10, 11]. The genetic potential of halophytic Poaceae can be used to improve glycophyte crops by identifying novel salt-responsive promoters and/or genes based on these resources [12,13,14].

In order to improve the knowledge on the adaptability of halophytes to salt stress, the physiological and molecular response of Aeluropus littoralis as a monocotyledonous halophyte model was evaluated under salt stress (600 mM NaCl treatment) and recovery conditions. Traits related to photosynthesis (Chl a, Chl b, and the total Cars), ion contents (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+), and antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, CAT, POD, and APX) were investigated in this study. On the molecular level, the mRNA abundance of AlSOD, AlCAT, and AlAPX genes at different time-points of salt stress and recovery conditions was analyzed and described.

Main text

Methods

Plant material and treatments

To ensure the uniformity of plants in this study, the cuttings of one mother plant of A. littoralis were collected from Isfahan province (32° 33′ 03.5"N 52° 29′ 31.3"E) were used in this study. Aeluropus plants were identified by Dr. Seyed Hassan Zali, and A specimen of the analyzed plants was deposited at the herbarium GAT under voucher number 70486. The growth conditions of Aeluropus seedlings were adjusted according to Fatemi et al. [7]. (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). At the end of the sixth passage, the shoot and root samples were collected at 6 h (S1), 48 h (S2), and after one week (S3). The salt-treated plants were transferred to a sodium chloride-free Hoagland's solution and further cultivated, designated as a recovery condition. The samples for recovery conditions were collected after 6 h (R1), 48 h (R2), and one week (R3) (Additional file 2: Fig. S2).

Physiological, Ion content and antioxidant enzyme activity measurement

Chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, and the total carotenoids (Cars) were extracted from aerial tissue using methanol, and the absorbance of the extract was measured at 665.2, 652.4, and 470 nm [15] using the Biochrom WPA Biowave II spectrophotometer. For elemental analysis, plant material was dried at 65 °C for 48 h, and its dry weight was recorded. Samples (three biological replications) were digested in 70% nitric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide for 2.5 h at 120 °C, and then the elements of Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+were measured by ICP-OES.

Total protein and ROS scavenging enzymes were purified from root and leaf samples according to Kaur et al. 2016 procedures [16]. Total soluble proteins were measured by the Bradford assay. The activity of SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) was measured using the reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) [17]. CAT (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was assayed based on the decomposition of H2O2 [18]. The APX (EC 1.11.1.11) was assayed according to the method described by Nakano and Asada [19]. Assays of POD (EC 1.11.1.7) activity were carried out using guaiacol as the hydrogen donor [20].

RT-qPCR

Total RNAs were extracted using Threezol reagent (Riragene company, Iran). The quality and quantity of RNA samples were estimated by Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Biochrom WPA Biowave II, UK). The sequences of CAT, SOD, cAPX, and pAPX as target genes and actin as a reference gene were obtained from the nucleotide database at NCBI. Primers of target and reference genes (except for APXs) were designed using Primer 3 software [21]. The gene-specific primers for two isoforms of cytosolic and peroxisomal APX were designed with the AlleleID v7.0 software (Premier, CA). A taxa-specific/cross-species assay was conducted with aligned sequences of various APX, which could detect cAPX or pAPX only (Table 1). The RT-qPCR was accomplished in the CFX96 real-time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad) according to Hashemi et al. [22, 23]. The specificity of primers was checked by melt curve analysis (Additional file 3: Fig. S3). RT-qPCR data were analyzed according to Livak and Schmittgen method [24].

Table 1 The list of primer and their features was used in this study
Full size table

Results and discussion

Changes in chlorophyll and carotenoids content

The content of Chl a increased sharply at 48 h during the salt stress treatment and then decreased significantly at the end of the salt stress treatments (Fig. 1A). Chl abundance during the recovery condition tends to return to control levels without reaching this initial value. In contrast, a significant increase in Chl b content (Fig. 1B) and subsequent Chl (a+b)/Cars ratio (Fig. 1F) were observed at S3 and R2 time-points (p-value < 0.01). A significant difference was observed in the Chl a/Chl b ratio between the R1 time-point and others (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Different physiological characteristics and elemental parameters of Aeluropus littoralis were trended during salinity stress (600 mM NaCl) and recovery. A chlorophyll a (Chl a), B chlorophyll b (Chl b), C total chlorophyll (Chl (a + b)), D chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b ratio (Chl a/b), E carotenoids (Cars), F total chlorophyll to carotenoids ratio (Chl (a + b)/Cars), G Sodium (Na+), H potassium (K+), I calcium (Ca2+), J magnesium (Mg2+), K sodium to potassium ratio (Na+/K+), L sodium to calcium ratio (Na+/Ca2+) content. The trend in leaf, root and stem tissues was illustrated by the red, blue and black lines, respectively. The values represent the mean (± SE) of three biological replicates. According to Duncan's multiple test, the treatments exhibited a statistically significant difference at the 5% level and were marked with distinct letters

Full size image

The Cars quantity showed a strong dynamic response to the stress conditions (Fig. 1E). The Chl (a+b) content increased over the entire stress treatment compared to control (Fig. 1C). Chl and Cars as a key photosynthetic pigments perform vital physiological functions and photosynthetic processes in plants [25]. A recent literature review shows that the effect of salinity stress on photosynthetic pigments is highly complex and plant-specific [26]. In this study, the levels of light-harvesting pigments (Chl) were not equally sensitive to salt stress and recovery conditions (Fig. 1). The reduction of Chl a abundance one week after the salt stress could be attributed to the inhibition of chlorophyll biosynthesis and/or the stimulation of chlorophyll degradation [27]. On the other hand, plants under salt stress (S3) and recovery condition (R2) had more Chl b content than Chl a. Our finding is in agreement with the described inter-conversion of Chl a and Chl b in the chlorophyll cycle, which occurs via 7-hydroxymethyl chlorophyll [28]. In general, understanding the optimization of leaf function under salt stress condition requires more investment in leaf resources in light-harvesting than energy processing. Our finding might indicate the optimization of the halophytes to withstand salinity stress. Contrary to several previous findings [29, 30], the present study showed that the levels of Chl a and Chl b (except R2) were not restored in stressed plants following recovery.

ICP–OES analysis

The most important factor here is the detection of sodium ions, as they reflect the amount of salt taken up from the soil. As A. littoralis is able to secrete salt through its salt glands, the level of detected sodium ions is a proxy for the level of in vivo salt stress in the respective tissue. Na+ levels in salt-stressed plants increased in the S2 and S3 time-points and decreased in the R2 and R3 conditions (Fig. 1G). The most variation in Na+ concentration was observed in root tissue by the highest and lowest levels of Na+ in salt stress and recovery conditions, respectively. In contrast, K+ accumulation in leaves and stems decreased during salt stress and increased during recovery (Fig. 1H). An increase in the ratio of Na+/K+ was observed in S2 and S3, while the decreasing trend was seen in recovery conditions (Fig. 1K). Ca2+ content significantly declined in leaf, root, and stem during salt stress compared to control, whereas it increased significantly in leaf and stem during the recovery condition (Fig. 1I). The trend of the Na+/Ca2+ ratio was similar to the Na+/K+ ratio with a minor difference (Fig. 1L). Mg2+ concentration gradually decreased during salt stress and gradually increased after transferring to recovery conditions (Fig. 1J).

High concentrations of Na+ decrease the amount of available K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ by displacing membrane-bound Ca2+ [31]. Furthermore, Na+ may interfere with K+'s function as a cofactor, resulting in a direct toxic effect [32]. In our experiments, the absorption of Na+ and K+ seemed to be competitive processes. The Na+ concentrations increased mainly in stress conditions, while K+ concentrations were reduced, especially in the roots and stem. This phenomenon occurred because halophytes needed fewer K+ than glycophytes for growth [33], confirming the capability to substitute K+ with Na+ and finally salt tolerance. This is also the case that was reported by Belkheiri and Mulas (2013) in Atriplex halimus [34]. Even though salt stress causes damage to plants, the post-stress response is vital for recovery and survival. A previous report has described the recovery conditions allowed for the removal of salt-induced ion toxicity by reducing Na+ accumulation and increasing K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations [29]. Other studies have found a decrease in oxidative damage and harmful ion accumulations [35].

Proline, total protein and ROS enzyme activities

Total protein levels in salt-stressed plants and recovery conditions were significantly lower than in controls in both leaves and roots (Fig. 2A). In our study, proline content increased during salt treatment. Proline accumulation was described as its adaptive advantage under stress conditions [36]. Proline content was significantly increased during salt stress, but decreased in recovery conditions (Fig. 2B). Antioxidant enzyme activity also tended to increase in salt stress during different time-points, but decreased in those recovery conditions (Fig. 2C–F). These changes in proline and activity of antioxidant enzymes suggest that both are affected by salt stress conditions and might play an important role in adaptation to salinity-induced oxidative stress. As described in other studies, antioxidant enzyme related genes respond to salt stress treatment [37]. The CAT activity was higher in the recovery condition than in control and stress conditions in the leaf (Fig. 2D). SOD activity increased in both leaves and roots compared to the control (Fig. 2C). Stress conditions caused a profound increase in SOD activity to its maximum level at the S3 time-point, but it suddenly reduced in recovery condition in the leaf. The response of investigated enzymes was variable at different times of salinity and recovery conditions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Trend of several antioxidant enzyme activities and their transcriptional responses under salinity stress and recovery. A total protein, B proline content, C superoxide dismutase (SOD), D activity of catalase (CAT), E ascorbate peroxidase (APX), F peroxidase (POD), G AlSOD, H AlCAT, I AlcAPX, and J AlpAPX in leaf and root of A. littoralis. The trend in leaf, root and stem tissues was illustrated by the red and black lines, respectively. The values represent the mean (± SE) of three biological replicates. According to Duncan's multiple test, the treatments exhibited a statistically significant difference at the 5% level and were marked with distinct letters

Full size image

ROS are known as cytotoxic compounds that have important roles in homeostasis and cell signaling, which activates antioxidant defense mechanisms [38, 39]. There was a difference between CAT and SOD activity with salinity increasing and duration. The different changes for CAT and SOD activity indicated the importance of SOD rather than CAT in oxidative damage as the stress-time duration extended. The increasing changes of APX activity in the leaf during stress conditions showed that the highest APX activity occurred at the S3 time-point (Fig. 2E). POD activity increased significantly in stressed plants up to the highest level at the S3 time-point, while it decreased in the recovery condition in both leaf and root (Fig. 2F). The activities of SOD and POD in leaves showed similar trends. The decreases in CAT, APX and SOD activities could be attributed to ROS accumulation to toxic levels [40].

RT-qPCR analysis

The AlSOD and AlCAT gene expressed similarly in leaf and root tissues. (Fig. 2G, H). The transcript levels of AlCAT in the leaves were consistent with CAT activities at different time-points, suggesting that CAT might be the main H2O2-scavenging enzyme to keep the balance of redox reactions in A. littoralis. The pattern of AlcAPX transcript level was highly similar to that of AlSOD mRNA, both in leaves and roots (Fig. 2I). The pattern of AlpAPX transcript levels in roots and leaves indicated an increase during salt application and a strong reduction during the recovery phase (Fig. 2J). APX isoforms of plants are found in chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes, cytosols and apoplasts [41]. The changes in transcript levels of AlAPX were not consistent with the APX activity, neither in leaf nor root, under stress and recovery conditions. From these results, the expressions of AlAPX and AlSOD were suppressed during the salinity-caused accumulation of H2O2. Similar results have been reported for rice [42]. This indicates a similar regulation via a common regulatory hub or transcription factor. Overexpression of antioxidant genes such as SOD, APX, and CAT was reported in wheat [43], Arabidopsis [44] and oat [45]. Our knowledge of the physiological mechanisms behind plants' responses to recovery is inadequate at this time. As evidenced by changes in chlorophyll fluorescence and oxidative stress indices, Aeluropus plants might perceive the recovery phase as a new stress condition.

Conclusion

In conclusion, rising soil salinity is one of the most significant problems to agricultural productivity worldwide [46, 47]. However, the severity and period of stress have a significant impact on the composition and quantities of leaf photosynthetic pigments, elemental, and antioxidant enzymes, further research is needed to have a better knowledge of how salinity stress affects different species [48]. Moreover, a precise assessment of these traits would allow for the presentation of plant health as well as an indirect reflection of stress response. Findings of this study point to some specific characteristics of A. littoralis in response to ROS accumulation and oxidative stress. These results demonstrated important indices of halophyte describing salinity tolerance mechanisms in A. littoralis.

Limitations

Due to missing A. littoralis complete genomic data, only small number of genes were selected for RT-qPCR expression analyses.

Availability of data and materials

A specimen of the analyzed plants was deposited by Dr. Markus kuhlmann at the Gatersleben herbarium (GAT) of the IPK under voucher number 70486. The datasets measured and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

Chl:

Chlorophyll

K+ :

Potassium

Ca2+ :

Calcium

Mg2+ :

Magnesium

CAT:

Catalase

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

APX:

Ascorbate peroxidase

O2 •− :

Superoxide

H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide

HO•:

Hydroxyl radicals

1O2 :

Singlet oxygen

Cars:

Carotenoids

RT-qPCR:

Reverse transcription–qPCR

NCBI:

National center for biotechnology information

ICP-OES:

Coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer

References:

  1. Isayenkov SV, Maathuis FJ. Plant salinity stress: many unanswered questions remain. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Munns R, Day DA, Fricke W, Watt M, Arsova B, Barkla BJ, Bose J, Byrt CS, Chen ZH, Foster KJ. Energy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants. New Phytol. 2020;225:1072–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dhankher OP, Foyer CH. Climate resilient crops for improving global food security and safety. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:877–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zribi OT, Barhoumi Z, Kouas S, Ghandour M, Slama I, Abdelly C. Insights into the physiological responses of the facultative halophyte Aeluropus littoralis to the combined effects of salinity and phosphorus availability. J Plant Physiol. 2015;189:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao C, Zhang H, Song C, Zhu J-K, Shabala S. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. Innovation. 2020;1: 100017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Saad RB, Romdhan WB, Zouari N, Azaza J, Mieulet D, Verdeil J-L, Guiderdoni E, Hassairi A. Promoter of the AlSAP gene from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis directs developmental-regulated, stress-inducible, and organ-specific gene expression in transgenic tobacco. Transgenic Res. 2011;20:1003–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fatemi F, Hashemi-Petroudi SH, Nematzadeh G, Askari H, Abdollahi MR. Exploiting differential gene expression to discover ionic and osmotic-associated transcripts in the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis. Biol Proced Online. 2019;21:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben-Romdhane W, Ben-Saad R, Meynard D, Zouari N, Mahjoub A, Fki L, Guiderdoni E, Al-Doss A, Hassairi A. Overexpression of AlTMP2 gene from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis in transgenic tobacco enhances tolerance to different abiotic stresses by improving membrane stability and deregulating some stress-related genes. Protoplasma. 2018;255:1161–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rancic D, Pecinar I, Acic S, Stevanovic ZD: 10 Morpho-anatomical traits of halophytic species. In: Halophytes and climate change: adaptive mechanisms and potential uses 2019; 152. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786394330.0152

  10. Panda A, Rangani J, Parida AK. Physiological and metabolic adjustments in the xero-halophyte Haloxylon salicornicum conferring drought tolerance. Physiol Plant. 2021;172:1189–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saad RB, Zouari N, Ramdhan WB, Azaza J, Meynard D, Guiderdoni E, Hassairi A. Improved drought and salt stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco overexpressing a novel A20/AN1 zinc-finger “AlSAP” gene isolated from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;72:171–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zouari N, Saad RB, Legavre T, Azaza J, Sabau X, Jaoua M, Masmoudi K, Hassairi A. Identification and sequencing of ESTs from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis. Gene. 2007;404:61–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Saad R, Fabre D, Mieulet D, Meynard D, Dingkuhn M, et al. Expression of the Aeluropus littoralis AlSAP gene in rice confers broad tolerance to abiotic stresses through maintenance of photosynthesis. Plant, Cell Environ. 2012;35:626–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hashemi SH, Arab M, Dolatabadi B, Kuo YT, Baez MA, Himmelbach A, Nematzadeh G, Maibody SA, Schmutzer T, Mälzer M, Altmann T. Initial description of the Genome of Aeluropus littoralis, a halophile grass. Front Plant Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-53457/v2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. In: Wrolstad RE, Acree TE, An H, Decker EA, Penner MH, Reid DS, Schwartz SJ, Shoemaker CF, Sporns P, editors. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaur N, Dhawan M, Sharma I, Pati PK. Interdependency of reactive oxygen species generating and scavenging system in salt sensitive and salt tolerant cultivars of rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971;44:276–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant cell physiol. 1981;22:867–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hammerschmidt R, Nuckles E, Kuć J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol Plant Pathol. 1982;20:73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Misener S, Krawetz SA, editors. Bioinformatics methods and protocols, vol. 132. Totowa: Humana Press; 2000. p. 365–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hashemipetroudi SH, Nematzadeh G, Ahmadian G, Yamchi A, Kuhlmann M. Assessment of DNA contamination in RNA samples based on ribosomal DNA. JoVE. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3791/55451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hashemi SH, Nematzadeh G, Ahmadian G, Yamchi A, Kuhlmann M. Identification and validation of Aeluropus littoralis reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization. J Biol Res Thessaloniki. 2016;23:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Y, Hu X, Jin G, Hou Z, Ning J, Zhang Z. Rapid prediction of chlorophylls and carotenoids content in tea leaves under different levels of nitrogen application based on hyperspectral imaging. J Sci Food Agric. 2019;99:1997–2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mbarki S, Sytar O, Cerda A, Zivcak M, Rastogi A, He X, Zoghlami A, Abdelly C, Brestic M. Strategies to mitigate the salt stress effects on photosynthetic apparatus and productivity of crop plants. In: Kumar V, Wani SH, Suprasanna P, Tran LS, editors. Salinity responses and tolerance in plants, vol. 1. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 85–136.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang C-M, Chang I, Lin S-J, Chou C-H. Effects of three allelopathic phenolics on chlorophyll accumulation of rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings: II. Stimulation of consumption-orientation. Bot Bull Acad Sin. 2004;45:119–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanaka A, Ito H, Tanaka R, Tanaka NK, Yoshida K, Okada K. Chlorophyll a oxygenase (CAO) is involved in chlorophyll b formation from chlorophyll a. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:12719–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Parvin K, Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan M, Nahar K, Mohsin SM, Fujita M. Comparative physiological and biochemical changes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under salt stress and recovery: role of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Antioxidants. 2019;8:350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Acosta-Motos J-R, Diaz-Vivancos P, Alvarez S, Fernández-García N, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Hernández JA. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of the ornamental Eugenia myrtifolia L. plants for coping with NaCl stress and recovery. Planta. 2015;242:829–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cramer GR, Läuchli A, Polito VS. Displacement of Ca2+ by Na+ from the plasmalemma of root cells: a primary response to salt stress. Plant Physiol. 1985;79:207–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan MA, Ungar IA, Showalter AM. Effects of salinity on growth, water relations and ion accumulation of the subtropical perennial halophyte Atriplex griffithii var. stocksii. Ann Bot. 2000;85:225–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marschner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Belkheiri O, Mulas M. The effects of salt stress on growth, water relations and ion accumulation in two halophyte Atriplex species. Environ Exp Bot. 2013;86:17–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cavalcanti FR, Lima JPMS, Ferreira-Silva SL, Viégas RA, Silveira JAG. Roots and leaves display contrasting oxidative response during salt stress and recovery in cowpea. J Plant Physiol. 2007;164:591–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lei C, Chang Y. Effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 stress on growth and physiological indexes in’Beta’grafted’Red Globe’grape seedlings. J GanSu Agr Univ. 2012;44:50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shafi A, Zahoor I, Mushtaq U: Proline accumulation and oxidative stress: Diverse roles and mechanism of tolerance and adaptation under salinity stress. In: Salt Stress, Microbes, and Plant Interactions: Mechanisms and Molecular Approaches. Springer; 2019: 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8805-7_13

  38. Neill SJ, Desikan R, Clarke A, Hurst RD, Hancock JT. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signalling molecules in plants. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:1237–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Verma G, Srivastava D, Tiwari P, Chakrabarty D: ROS modulation in crop plants under drought stress. In: Reactive oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur species in plants: Production, metabolism, signaling and defense mechanisms 2019:311–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468677.ch13

  40. Jiang M, Zhang J. Water stress-induced abscisic acid accumulation triggers the increased generation of reactive oxygen species and up-regulates the activities of antioxidant enzymes in maize leaves. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:2401–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pitzschke A, Forzani C, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:1757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yin G, Xin X, Song C, Chen X, Zhang J, Wu S, Li R, Liu X, Lu X. Activity levels and expression of antioxidant enzymes in the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in artificially aged rice seed. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;80:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Melchiorre M, Robert G, Trippi V, Racca R, Lascano HR. Superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase overexpression in wheat protoplast: photooxidative stress tolerance and changes in cellular redox state. Plant Growth Regul. 2009;57:57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Li L, Yi H. Effect of sulfur dioxide on ROS production, gene expression and antioxidant enzyme activity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012;58:46–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kong L, Huo H, Mao P. Antioxidant response and related gene expression in aged oat seed. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ben-Saad R, Ben-Ramdhan W, Zouari N, Azaza J, Mieulet D, Guiderdoni E, Ellouz R, Hassairi A. Marker-free transgenic durum wheat cv. Karim expressing the AlSAP gene exhibits a high level of tolerance to salinity and dehydration stresses. Mol Breeding. 2012;30:521–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Barhoumi Z, Djebali W, Chaïbi W, Abdelly C, Smaoui A. Salt impact on photosynthesis and leaf ultrastructure of Aeluropus littoralis. J Plant Res. 2007;120:529–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shah SH, Houborg R, McCabe MF. Response of chlorophyll, carotenoid and SPAD-502 measurement to salinity and nutrient stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Agronomy. 2017;7:61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all members of Genetic and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute of Tabarestan (GABIT), Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU) for their helpful discussion and technical assistance.

Funding

This research was supported by the Genetics and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute of Tabarestan (GABIT), Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genetics and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute of Tabarestan (GABIT), Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, PO Box 578, Sari, Iran

    Seyyed Hamidreza Hashemipetroudi, Farzaneh Fatemi & Ghorbanali Nematzadeh

  2. National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Tehran, Iran

    Gholamreza Ahmadian

  3. Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

    Ahad Yamchi

  4. RG Heterosis, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Germany

    Seyyed Hamidreza Hashemipetroudi & Markus Kuhlmann

Authors
  1. Seyyed Hamidreza Hashemipetroudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gholamreza Ahmadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Farzaneh Fatemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ghorbanali Nematzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahad Yamchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Markus Kuhlmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SHH conducted all experiments, lab work, data analyses and interpretation of results. GA, GN and AY conceived and designed the study. SHH and FF wrote the manuscript. MK and SHH reviewed the manuscript, and had all critical supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyyed Hamidreza Hashemipetroudi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedure related to plant material used here complied with national and international guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1

. The salt stress and recovery condition of A. littoralis and their growth parameters.

Additional file 2: Fig. S2.

Experiment timeline.

Additional file 3: Fig. S3.

Checking the primers specificity by melt curve analysis.

Additional file 4: Fig. S4.

A leaf surface of A. littoralis plants grown at different watering regimes (left: Hoagland solution, and right: On the leaves of a stressed plant, salt gland secretions were visible in the form of salt crystals.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashemipetroudi, S.H., Ahmadian, G., Fatemi, F. et al. Ion content, antioxidant enzyme activity and transcriptional response under salt stress and recovery condition in the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis. BMC Res Notes 15, 201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06090-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06090-4

Keywords

  • Halophyte
  • Salt stresses
  • Catalase
  • Superoxide dismutase
  • Ascorbate peroxidase
  • RT-qPCR
  • Elemental analysis

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us