Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research note
  • Open access
  • Published:

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and bloodstream infection among conventional hemodialysis patients in Thailand: a prospective multicenter cohort study

BMC Research Notes volume 15, Article number: 290 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage screening among hemodialysis patients is not standard practice in Thailand, because of data lacking regarding prevalence and correlation with subsequent infection. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage and its association with bloodstream infection among hemodialysis patients. In this prospective multicenter cohort study, participants were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage over 2 consecutive weeks. Incidence of S. aureus bloodstream infection over the next 12 months was observed.

Results

The prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage was 11.67%. Incidence of S. aureus bacteremia among participants with and without S. aureus nasal carriage were 7.1% and 3.8%, respectively. The odds ratio for nasal carriage and subsequent bacteremia was 1.96 (95% CI 0.04–21.79; p = 0.553). Survival analysis showed that time to bacteremia among participants in the two groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.531). Prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients in Thailand was low. Patients presenting with S. aureus nasal carriage did not have increased risk of S. aureus bacteremia after 12-month follow-up. Nasal S. aureus screening and decolonization should not be encouraged in this setting.

Introduction

Bloodstream infection is the most common type of infection among hemodialysis patients, with Staphylococcus aureus as the main causative pathogen [1]. S. aureus colonizes humans especially in the nasal area, and carriage is recognized as an important risk factor for subsequent bloodstream infection [2].

Hemodialysis patients appear to have a greater risk of S. aureus colonization. An observational study reported a high rate of S. aureus nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients (40%), compared to normal populations (27%) [3]. An artificial nasal colonization study found that the average duration of S. aureus colonization was 4 days in the non-carriage group, and 14 days in the intermittent S. aureus nasal carriage group. However, among patients with persistent S. aureus nasal carriage, duration of colonization has been observed for up to 157 days [4].

Screening of S. aureus nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients and decolonization using mupirocin ointments exhibited more than 80% reduction in S. aureus infection and bacteremia [5]. Therefore, screening for S. aureus nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients is a routine practice in several countries [6, 7].

In Thailand, community-acquired methicillin resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) has not been observed and there is a lack of data regarding the prevalence of nasal carriage and association with invasive diseases [8]. Given the difference in epidemiology, screening of S. aureus nasal carriage is not a standard practice in Thailand. We therefore aimed to investigate the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage and its association with S. aureus bloodstream infection among hemodialysis patients.

Main text

Material and methods

Study setting and design

We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received hemodialysis at Phramongkutklao Hospital and Ananda Mahidol Hospital hemodialysis centers from July 2020 to September 2020 were enrolled. We estimated a sample size of 145 participants based on a previous study showing S. aureus nasal carriage among 40% of ESRD patients [3]. This provided 80% power to demonstrate the correlation between S. aureus nasal carriage and S. aureus bacteremia, with a two-sided alpha level of 0.05. The inclusion criteria included: age over 18 years, diagnosis of ESRD, receiving conventional hemodialysis, and regular follow up at two study hospitals. We excluded any patients who were undergoing hemodialysis for acute kidney injury.

Nose swab and bacterial isolates

All patients completed study questionnaires regarding their sociodemographic data and medical history. Bacterial swabs were obtained by study staff from the nasal mucosa at anterior nares once a week for 2 consecutive weeks. On each occasion, the cotton tip was inserted 1 cm into one nostril, rotated four times with slight pressure against the nasal septum, and transported with Amies transport medium. Each specimen was gently rolled and streaked on 5% sheep blood agar (BA) which were incubated at 37 °C for up to 24 h. Identification of S. aureus was carried out following standard microbiologic methods recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [9]. Positive swabs were defined as a colony forming unit (CFU) of > 103. S. aureus isolates were inoculated in Mueller Hinton Agar and methicillin susceptibility was identified by disc diffusion method using 30 µg cefoxitin disc. Isolates with zone diameters of  ≥ 25 mm were classified as methicillin-susceptible whereas zone diameters of ≤  24 mm were classified as resistant, according to CLSI guidelines [9].

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and S. aureus bacteremia

Participants were classified into three groups based on their S. aureus nasal carriage: no nasal carriage, intermittent nasal carriage, and persistent nasal carriage. Intermittent nasal carriage was defined as a positive nasal swab in only one of the two specimens, while persistent nasal carriage was defined as positive nasal swabs in both specimens [10, 11]. All participants were followed up until 12 months after the last nasal swab collection for their status of S. aureus bacteremia, defined as at least one isolation of S. aureus from a blood culture. Participants lost to follow up were excluded from the analysis but were interviewed by phone for the admission with signs or symptoms compatible with bacteremia. Participants and primary doctors were not informed of the carrier status and all participants presenting S. aureus nasal carriage did not receive any decolonization intervention.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Categorical data were presented as percentages while mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for continuous data. For categorical variables, Fisher’s exact test or the Chi-square test was used, while Mann–Whitney test or Student’s T-test was used to compare continuous variables. The relationship between S. aureus nasal carriage and S. aureus bloodstream infection was analyzed using odds ratios and was presented with a 95% confidence interval. We used Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the cumulative bacteremia and stratified log-rank statistic to assess the risk of nasal carriage compared with non-nasal carriage. For all analyses, a two-sided p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 Software (StataCorp, USA).

Result

From July 2020 to September 2020, 141 hemodialysis patients at the two hemodialysis centers were enrolled. Nine participants declined to participate in the study and 12 participants were excluded owing to changes in their hemodialysis center during this period. These 12 participants were all non-carriers. They did not report admission with signs or symptoms compatible with bacteremia upon phone interview. Hence, we included 120 participants (Additional file1: Fig S1).

Patient characteristics

Of 120 participants, the mean age was 54.9 ± 16.07 years. Half of the participants were female. The two most common routes of hemodialysis were arteriovenous fistula, and tunneled hemodialysis catheter, respectively. The most common underlying diseases were hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Female sex and dyslipidemia were significantly more common in the carrier group (OR 4.11; 95%CI 1.08–15.56, p = 0.027, and OR 4.60; 95%CI 1.21–17.45, p = 0.008 respectively). Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of hemodialysis patients presenting S. aureus nasal carrier and non-carrier
Full size table

The prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage was 11.67% (14 /120), with ten cases classified as intermittent and four cases classified as persistent nasal carriage. The prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage in hemodialysis patients of Phramongkutklao and Ananda Mahidol Hospital was 10.71% and 11.96%, respectively (p = 0.858). All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to methicillin (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; MSSA).

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia occurred in five participants after 12 month follow-up (incidence = 4.17%). Among participants with S. aureus nasal carriage, one participant in the intermittent nasal carriage group had S. aureus bacteremia (incidence = 7.1%; 1/14), while 4 participants in the non-nasal carriage group had S. aureus bacteremia (3.8%; 4/106). Participants with nasal carriage were not more likely to develop bacteremia than participants presenting non nasal carriage at 12 months (OR 1.96; p = 0.553).

Clinical characteristics of participants presenting bacteremia are described in Table 2. All S. aureus isolated in blood culture were MSSA. Among participants presenting bacteremia, nasal carriage patients developed bacteremia in 41 days while non nasal carriage patients developed bacteremia at 89, 89, 111 and 153 days, respectively. Cumulative bacteremia did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.531) (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of S. aureus bacteremia participants
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan Meier curve demonstrating cumulative S. aureus bacteremia among participants with and without nasal carriage

Full size image

Discussion

In this prospective multicenter cohort study among hemodialysis patients, the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage was 11.7%. This number was lower than reported in other studies. For example, a related systematic review and meta-analysis among 2,374 participants revealed the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage at 26% [5]. Another report also found a 40% prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients [3]. Several factors may have influenced this effect. Firstly, the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage in the general population in Thailand is low. Related studies in Thailand reported the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage at 20, 13.9, and 3.6% among patients with allergic rhinitis, patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, and pre-admission screening, respectively [12,13,14]. These proportions are lower than the reported prevalence in the US and Germany at 22% and 40%, respectively [4, 15]. Although the prevalence of nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients is usually higher when compared with the general population [3], we found that the prevalence of carriage in our cohort was close to that of the general Thai population. This also correlated with the lower incidence of S. aureus infection in hospitals and the lower colonization rate among health care personnel in Thailand [13,14,15,16,17]. Secondly, in this present study, most participants had permanent vascular access. This was associated with a lower risk of S. aureus nasal carriage compared with temporary dialysis access [18]. Finally, the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage may depend on several factors particularly, ethnicity, previous antibiotic use, socioeconomic status, and geographic differences between countries, as well as personal hygiene [18, 19].

The present study describes female sex and dyslipidemia being associated with S. aureus carriage. Association between sex and S. aureus nasal carriage status remains controversial [20, 21]. Women with low levels of circulating testosterone may have increased probability of persistent S. aureus carriage [22]. The nasal colonization of S. aureus among patients undergoing hemodialysis depends on underlying host conditions especially skin disease and diabetic mellitus. Nevertheless, dyslipidemia has not been established as a risk factor in related studies [23]. However, the association that we found in this present study may not represent the true relationship, because other confounding variables were not explored or controlled for. Well-designed studies are warranted to resolve this situation.

This study did not find any association between S. aureus nasal carriage and bacteremia. This may be explained by the unexpectedly low prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage, compared with the prevalence at 40–65% reported in several studies which described associations between nasal carriage and bacteremia [3, 10, 24]. However, the rate of invasive infection within 6 to 20 months of nasal carriage was 19% [25], much higher than the 4.17% found in this study. Therefore, another possible explanation is the difference in the virulence of S. aureus between the studies. Although this study was conducted in tertiary hospital hemodialysis centers, we did not find MRSA. This conforms with reported data in Thailand which indicated an extremely low rate of MRSA nasal colonization either among patients or healthcare personnel [13, 14, 17]. The molecular basis and biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus in each strain play a major role in the ability to colonize and develop invasive diseases [2, 26,27,28]. Molecular characterization as well as biofilm production of the isolated S. aureus nasal carriage strain should be further investigated.

To our knowledge, this study constitutes the first report of the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriers and the relationship between nasal carriage and S. aureus bloodstream infection among hemodialysis patients in Thailand.

Conclusion

Prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage among hemodialysis patients at two Thai tertiary hospitals was 11.67%. Patients who had S. aureus nasal carriage did not have increased risk of S. aureus bacteremia after 12 month follow-up. In healthcare centers with low S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence, nasal S. aureus screening and decolonization should not be encouraged.

Limitations

First, some participants were lost to follow up, which might have influenced the study result. However, this subset of patients were all non-carriers and did not report admission with signs or symptoms compatible with bacteremia. Therefore, the true incidence of bacteremia of the non-carrier group, but not in carrier group, might be underreported. Second, the molecular characteristics of the S. aureus isolates were not identified. Therefore, we could not confirm the linkage between colonization and bacteremia. Nevertheless, only one patient was found in this group. Finally, the adherence to basic infection prevention strategies among hemodialysis centers was not monitored. Therefore, we could not ensure that the lower rate of S. aureus nasal colonization and infection was due to good adherence to basic infection control. However, no difference was found in colonization between the two study sites.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AVF:

Arteriovenous fistula

AVG:

Arteriovenous graft

DLC:

Double lumen catheter

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

S. aureus :

Staphylococcus aureus

ESRD:

End stage renal disease

CA:

Cancer

RCC:

Renal cell carcinoma

HT:

Hypertension

DLP:

Dyslipidemia

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematous

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSSA:

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

CRBSI:

Catheter related blood stream infection

References

  1. Yu VL, Goetz A, Wagener M, Smith PB, Rihs JD, Hanchett J, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection in patients on hemodialysis efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(2):91–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(12):751–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheuch M, Freiin von Rheinbaben S, Kabisch A, Engeßer J, Ahrendt S, Dabers T, et al. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in hemodialysis patients: a prospective 25 months observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Belkum A, Verkaik NJ, de Vogel CP, Boelens HA, Verveer J, Nouwen JL, et al. Reclassification of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage types. J Infect Dis. 2009;199(12):1820–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grothe C, Taminato M, Belasco A, Sesso R, Barbosa D. Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow JW, Yu VL. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in hemodialysis patients: its role in infection and approaches to prophylaxis. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(6):1258–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Verhoeven PO, Gagnaire J, Haddar CH, Grattard F, Thibaudin D, Afiani A, et al. Identifying hemodialysis patients with the highest risk of Staphylococcus aureus endogenous infection through a simple nasal sampling algorithm. Medicine. 2016;95(14): e3231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yungyuen T, Chatsuwan T, Plongla R, Kanthawong S, Yordpratum U, Voravuthikunchai SP, et al. Nationwide surveillance and molecular characterization of critically drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: results of the research university network Thailand study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(9): e0067521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. 2020 Accessed 15 Oct 2021.

  10. Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology underlying mechanisms and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(3):505–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mège J-L, Rolain J-M, Blin O. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization an update on mechanisms epidemiology risk factors, and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suvarnsit K, Kiratisin P, Bunnag C, Tantilipikorn P. Prevalence of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in allergic rhinitis patients and healthy controls in Thailand. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2021;39(3):163–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Apisarnthanarak A, Warren DK, Fraser VJ. Prevalence of nasal carriage of mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among hospitalized patients in Thailand. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(5):522–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pongbangli N, Oniem N, Chaiwarith R, Nantsupawat T, Phrommintikul A, Wongcharoen W. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and surgical site infection rate among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;106:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma Y, Jain S, Singh H, Govil V. Staphylococcus aureus: screening for nasal carriers in a community setting with special reference to MRSA. Scientifica. 2014;2014: 479048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehraj J, Witte W, Akmatov MK, Layer F, Werner G, Krause G. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage patterns in the community. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2016;398:55–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Treesirichod A, Hantagool S, Prommalikit O. Nasal carriage and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus among medical students at the HRH princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn medical center, Thailand: a cross sectional study. J Infect Public Health. 2013;6(3):196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karanika S, Zervou FN, Zacharioudakis IM, Paudel S, Mylonakis E. Risk factors for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in dialysis patients: a meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2015;91(3):257–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang YC, Tai WC, Yu CC, Kang JH, Huang YC. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among patients receiving hemodialysis in Taiwan: prevalence rate, molecular characterization and de-colonization. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu CM, Price LB, Hungate BA, Abraham AG, Larsen LA, Christensen K, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and the ecology of the nasal microbiome. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1400216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen K, Falch BM, Danielsen K, Johannessen M, Ericson Sollid JU, Thune I, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, gender and smoking status the Tromsø staph and skin study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(4):465–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stensen DB, Småbrekke L, Olsen K, Grimnes G, Nielsen CS, Sollid JUE, et al. Circulating sex-steroids and Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in a general female population. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;184(2):337–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mège JL, Rolain JM, Blin O. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Piraino B. Staphylococcus aureus infections in dialysis patients: focus on prevention. Asaio J. 2000;46(6):S13–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zacharioudakis IM, Zervou FN, Ziakas PD, Mylonakis E. Meta-analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of infection in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(9):2131–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitti T, Seng R, Thummeepak R, Boonlao C, Jindayok T, Sitthisak S. Biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolated from clinical samples in Northern Thailand. J Glob Infect Dis. 2019;11(3):112–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khasawneh AI, Himsawi N, Abu-Raideh J, Salameh MA, Al-Tamimi M, Al Haj Mahmoud S, et al. Status of biofilm-forming genes among jordanian nasal carriers of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. IBJ. 2020;24(6):386–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Donadu MG, Ferrari M, Mazzarello V, Zanetti S, Kushkevych I, Rittmann SKR, et al. No correlation between biofilm-forming capacity and antibiotic resistance in environmental Staphylococcus spp in vitro results. Pathogens. 2022;11(4):471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results of this study were presented in part at 32nd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 23-26, 2022, in Lisbon, Portugal. We thank Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Pathology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Ananda Mahidol Hospital for bacterial isolation and standard antimicrobial susceptibility test.

Funding

This study was supported by the Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao Hospital Foundation. The funder provided budget in the patient data collection process and all research equipment expenses, e.g., laboratory equipment and office supplies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand

    Tanyanop Techasupaboon

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Ananda Mahidol Hospital, Lopburi, Thailand

    Vasin Vasikasin

  3. Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand

    Vasin Vasikasin

  4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand

    Narittaya Varothai

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Ananda Mahidol Hospital, Lopburi, Thailand

    Navee Raknaisil

  6. Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Worapong Nasomsong

Authors
  1. Tanyanop Techasupaboon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vasin Vasikasin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narittaya Varothai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Navee Raknaisil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Worapong Nasomsong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, TT, WN, NV, NR and VV; methodology, TT, WN and VV; software, TT, WN and VV; validation, TT, WN and VV; formal analysis, TT, WN and VV; investigation, TT, WN, NV, NR and VV; resources, TT, WN, NV, NR and VV; data curation, TT, WN, NV, NR and VV; writing—original draft preparation, TT, WN and VV; writing—review and editing, TT, WN, NV, NR and VV visualization, TT, WN and VV; supervision, WN, and VV; project administration, WN; funding acquisition, WN, and TT All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Worapong Nasomsong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board, Royal Thai Army Medical Department in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, CIOMS Guidelines and the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use—Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), approval number R071h/63. Informed consent was obtained in written from all participants in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Participant enrollment.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Techasupaboon, T., Vasikasin, V., Varothai, N. et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and bloodstream infection among conventional hemodialysis patients in Thailand: a prospective multicenter cohort study. BMC Res Notes 15, 290 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06185-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06185-y

Keywords

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us