Skip to main content

Frequencies of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2) genes in clinically isolated Escherichia coli; a cross sectional study



Escherichia coli (E. coli) is an opportunistic bacterium, which is globally recognized for its high prevalence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The presence of colistin-resistant representative mcr- 1, 2 genes in multi-drug resistant (MDR) clinically isolated E. coli is the main goal of this survey. After biochemically and molecular confirmation tests, susceptibility testing, biofilm formation, and minimum inhibitory concentration to colistin were performed on 100 E. coli isolates. Subsequently, taking advantage of uniplex-PCR, the presence of some responsible genes (mcr- 1, mcr- 2) to colistin-resistant phenotypes in mentioned bacterium was assessed.


Disc diffusion methods indicated that the highest resistance rate was against ampicillin (80.0%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (63%). Among the E. coli isolates, 72 (72.0%) was determined as MDR, respectively. Moreover, 47 (47%) strains were determined as extreme beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotypes. Among 41 slime-producing E. coli strains, 7 (17.07%), 14 (34.14%), and 20 (48.78%) strains exhibited high, moderate, and weak levels of biofilm formation, respectively. Fifty-nine (81.94%), and 1(100%) of MDR isolates were assessed as colistin resistant (MIC > 2) and susceptible (MIC ≤ 2) as well. In 26(36.11%) of colistin-resistant isolates and 1(1.38%) of colistin, susceptible isolate mcr-1 gene was found. There is no mcr- 2 gene was detected in isolates.


The diversity of high antibiotic-resistant rates could be avoided by developing appropriate healthcare policies and community awareness. Alarming resistance rates were observed in colistin and ampicillin, which should be taken into account in therapy guidelines.

Peer Review reports


Antibiotics have always played an important role in taking care of people’s health all over the globe. Their success in limiting so many infections is undeniable; however, immethodical use of them has led to a rise in antimicrobial-resistant species (AMR). Escherichia coli (E. coli) in company with other gram-negative bacteria are now one of the main players in this resistance. The rise of AMR leads to a decrease in antimicrobial efficacy, making the treatment procedure more difficult and costly for the patients. What seems to be waiting for us at the end of this path is the appearance of pan-drug resistant species, which will take us back to the pre-antibiotic era [1].

E. coli is responsible for most of the gram-negative blood and urinary tract infections (UTI) in humans. Moreover, these gram-negative bacilli are found oftentimes in female genital tracts causing difficulties for pregnant women, such as neonatal sepsis, puerperal and intra-amniotic infections, as well as endocervical and vaginal colonization [1,2,3].

E. coli has a history of antibiotic resistance, as it is proven to be resistant to ampicillin and gentamicin, which were used to cure neonatal infections caused by this specific bacterium. As the resistance towards antimicrobial drugs spreads between bacteria, frequently used drugs such as penicillin’s, beta-lactamase, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides are no longer effective. Hence, we are going back to using older antibiotics like polymyxins. Currently, two of them named polymyxin E (Colistin) and polymyxin B are being used in treatment processes [4]. Colistin may be the last hope to cure infections caused by gram-negative pathogens. The world reporting cases of resistance to this antibiotic is extremely concerning to the experts, and the slow progress of pharmaceutical companies in solving this problem is bringing us closer to a global catastrophe.

Different genes may be the agent of resistance in E. coli isolates but according to various studies, mcr genes are the most suspected ones [5]. Many studies have been conducted on this matter in animals and poultry specimens, and also a few on human samples. Therefore, this study aims to realize whether the clinically colistin-resistant E. coli isolates have mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2) genes in their genome causing them to be resistant to this colistin.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and identification of bacterial isolates

In this cross-sectional study, 107 E. coli isolates (urine, blood, sputum and stool) were collected (September 2021–March 2022) from clinically hospitalized patient specimens in northwest Iran. Isolates were cultured from transported clinical samples of those patients from different clinical samples suspected to have a clinical infection which hospitalized in the various hospital wards. There is no direct contact with the patients and every laboratory test was conducted on isolated bacteria from transferred clinical samples to the laboratory to further procedure. Blood samples containing citrate anticoagulant were cultured and preserved in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 37 °C. Initial isolate identification was performed using conventional and standard biochemical microbiology tests and media including gram staining, McConkey agar, sulfide indole motility (SIM), citrate, methyl red (MR), Voges-Proskauer (VP), triple sugar iron (TSI), DNase, urease, gelatinase, lysine decarboxylase, oxidase and catalase (Merck, Germany). The VP and non-motility of the subsequent routine biochemical tests were used as the crucial steps to biochemically determining identity in E. coli isolates [6, 7].

Re-confirmation of E. coli isolates by PCR

The PCR test using specific primers also tested and reconfirmed all strains. PCR was accomplished by taking advantage of the corresponding gene to the E. coli 16S rRNA according to the previously published [8].

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed based on disc diffusion method using imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cotrimoxazole (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), ampicillin + sulbactam (10 µg + 10 µg), piperacillin + tazobactam (100 µg + 10 µg), and levofloxacin (10 µg) (Mast, UK) antibiotics according to clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI) guideline on Mueller–Hinton Agar plates (Merck, Germany) [9]. Considering the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MDR isolates were determined [10].

ESBL phenotype method

ESBL phenotypes were detected through the results of the Antibiogram according to the referenced article [11]. A phenotypic confirmatory test for ESBL- producing isolate recognition was performed according to CLSI disc diffusion guidelines using cefotaxime (30 µg) and ceftazidime (30 µg) (Mast, UK) in combination with clavulanic acid. After to 24 h of incubation of the Muller-Hinton medium at 37 °C, an over 5 mm diameter increase in the clavulanic acid combined discs compared to the disks without clavulanic acid indicated ESBL production in the cultured bacteria. K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 was used as a control in this step [12].

In vitro biofilm formation assay

Semi -quantitative biofilm formation assay was done based on the previously published [13]. In short, microtiter plates with E. coli bacteria and an equal medium were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h then, the production of biofilm was evaluated taking advantage of the colorimetric assays as follows. After 24-h incubation, the medium was removed and the microtiter plate wells were washed three times with 200 µL of PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) buffer, and allowed to dry in the air for 15 min. The microtiter plate wells were stained with 200 µL of 0.4% crystal violet for 10 min at room temperature. The remaining crystal violet stain was removed, and the wells were washed gently three times with 200 µL of PBS buffer. The wells were air-dried for 15 min and the crystal violet in each well was solubilized by adding 200 µL of 33% acetic acid. The plate was read at 630 nm using a microtiter plate reader [13].

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin

MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) for colistin antibiotic was measured using microtiter plate assay in which 0.5-McFarland suspensions of each isolate were cultured in 12 wells and exposed to high to low concentrations of antibiotics according to the kit manufacturer’s protocol, and the minimum concentration of antibiotic that inhibited the growth of microorganisms was got [10]. Serial dilutions of colistin (64–1 µg/ml) were prepared in microtiter plates and a standardized inoculum of 0.5 McFarland was prepared using freshly cultured isolates through the direct colony suspension method. After adding the suspension of the bacteria to the wells, microtiter plates were incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 20 h. The MIC of colistin as the lowest concentration of colistin that completely inhibits the growth of the organism in the micro-dilution wells was read as detected by the unaided eye [14]. Interpretation of results were conducted based on the previously published ((MIC ≤ 2) sensitive and (MIC > 2) resistant strains) [14].

Total DNA extraction

Total DNA was extracted based on the previously published study [15]. Briefly, to investigate the presence or absence of genes (mcr-1, 2), the total genomic DNA of strains was extracted using the boiling and then DNA extraction kit recommendation (Cinnagen; Cat no. MBK0021).

Molecular detection of target genes

Standardization of PCR to targeted genes was done according to the published guidelines [15]. The study genes were amplified by PCR using a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Germany) as follows: PCR reaction was performed in a volume of 25 μl. Master mix Blue (Takara, Japan) and. Finally, the PCR reaction was performed in the thermal cycler following standardization for all target genes. PCR products were then evaluated for the presence of the desired genes (mcr-1 and mcr-2) using electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel followed by staining with safe stain [15].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the results was accomplished using SPSS 19 (SPSS Inc., IL., Chicago, USA) and a Fisher exact test.


Out of 107 biochemical-identifiedE. coli isolates recovered from clinical samples, 100 isolates were reconfirmed by targeting 16srRNA gene. The susceptibility pattern of isolates by disc diffusion method showed that the highest resistance rate was against ampicillin (80.0%) followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (60.0%), and the highest susceptibility rates, 98%, 96.8%, and 81.0% were related to imipenem, amikacin, and gentamicin. Detailed data was shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolated strains

Based on the combination disc method, out of 100 E. coli isolates, 47 (47%) strains were determined as ESBL phenotypes. Fifty-nine (81.94%), and 1(18.05%) of MDR E. coli isolates were assessed as colistin-resistant (MIC > 2) and susceptible (MIC ≤ 2) strains taking advantage of micro dilution test.

Among a total number of 41 slime-producing. coli strains, 7 (17.07%), 14 (34.41%), and 20 (48.78%) strains respectively exhibited high (\(4O{D}_{C}<OD\)), moderate (\(O{D}_{C}<OD<2O{D}_{C}\)), and weak (\(O{D}_{C}<OD<2O{D}_{C}\)) levels of biofilm formation, while 59 (59%) were shown to have no biofilm formation capability. Screening of mcr-1 gene by using a molecular approach on MDR strains which were detected using the disc diffusion method, we came up with the results. In 26 (36.11%) of E. coli isolates with MIC > 2, and 1 (1.38%) isolate with MIC ≤ 2 mcr-1 genes were found. There is no mcr-2 detected gene in isolated strains. According to the analysis of the results using SPSS, we figured that 37.49% of our MDR- positive species tended to have the mcr-1 gene in their genome while 81.94% of them (MDR- positives) were resistant to colistin according to our MIC method measures. Around half of these mcr-1 positive isolates produced biofilm, and the rest belonged to the non-biofilm producing category. There is no mcr -2 detected genes in our isolates. Detailed data were reported in Tables 2, 3.

Table 2 Frequencies of resistant pattern of utilized antibiotic based on the biofilm formation capability
Table 3 Frequency of ESBL phenotypes, mcr-1 gene and MIC colistin in biofilm forming E. coli isolates


E. coli, as the main inhabitant of the human gastrointestinal tract (GI), is a causative agent of various infections [16]. The high incidence of Enterobacteriaceae is usual; the isolation rates of mentioned bacteria from suspected urinary tract infections are high. In the current research taking advantage of biochemical recipes, 107 isolates were detected as E. coli and following the molecular approach (PCR) using a specific primer, 100 isolates were precisely confirmed as E. coli. The relatively high prevalence of E. coli in the human clinical infections of the present study may be due to the ubiquitous presence of the bacterium in the hospital environment, its ability to biofilm formation, and finally failure to observe sanitary and disinfection principles [16].

Antibiotic-resistant species tend to be a big threat to humanity as there is a very small chance to survive one when it resists all kinds of treatments. As time passes more species develop resistance to antimicrobial treatments and considering the slow improvements in the pharmaceutical industry, identification, and control of this species may be a tiny silver lining to preventing this issue's disastrous consequences [17]. In our study the rates of resistance were ampicillin (80% Resistant) and imipenem (98% sensitive). In a study conducted by Daoud in 2021., amikacin 98.6% and ampicillin 39.1% were investigated as the highest and lowest resistance rates in isolates [17]. Mostafavi 2019., showed that imipenem (94.9%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (31.3%) were as not effective and effective antibiotics on isolates [18]. The reason for these differences can probably be attributed to the type of treatment regimen in hospitals and the way of infection control in the study areas. According to the Disc diffusion results of our antibiogram, ampicillin, and sulfamethoxazole have developed the highest proportion of resistance, respectively.

Based on the localarea, various capabilities of biofilm formation of E. coli isolates were observed. In this study, biofilm-producing species formed only 1% of the colistin-resistant E. coli samples while the highest percentage of biofilm production appears to belong to ampicillin-resistant species [19]. Yet most antibiotic-resistant species of E. coli seem to produce no biofilm.

E. coli is one of the most common causative agents of infections around the globe and in our hometown. As a traditional procedure for the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae infections colistin is widely used in poultry farms and is the last-resort antibiotic for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections [14]. The main part of published studies is focused on colistin-resistant E. coli in regional animals. In this survey plasmid-mediated resistance to colistin by targeting the mcr -1, 2 in clinically isolated E. coli to evaluation of mentioned genes frequencies in human isolates was done. Many studies have been conducted on this matter in animals and poultry, and also a few on human samples. The studies mostly targeted mcr -1 and not many considered mcr -2 as a subject of study, which appears to be due to difficulties in its detection [15]. Thus, we decided to study the prevalence of resistance to colistin in E. coli infected samples in a certain timeframe and consequently the incidence of mcr -1 and mcr -2 in resistant species as the most suspected agents of this resistance [14]. After extracting The DNA from our samples, we started setting up our PCR program to achieve the optimum temperature program for both mcr -1, 2 to multiply. Although we were able to come up with a plan to run PCR on mcr -1 successfully there is no detection of mcr -2 in isolated strains. In conclusion, based on the modifications in the antibiogram interpretation criteria, antibiotic prescription procedure, and wrong traditional prevention and treatment in livestock industries, the susceptibility pattern of E. coli is constantly changing. Reconsideration in empirical therapy and restriction in extreme use of antibiotics such as colistin in the livestock industry should be considered.


The genetic relationship between the resistant isolates, investigating any correlations with patient characteristics, and other molecular determinants responsible for colistin resistance of E. coli are not aimed and not determined. These are the limitations of the current.

Availability of data and materials

All results of this study have been classified and maintained by a dissertation in the Zanjan University of medical Sciences. We have indeed provided all raw data on which our study is based. In addition, the datasets analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available from an Educational Hospital but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences.


  1. Vila J, Sáez-López E, Johnson JR, Römling U, Dobrindt U, Cantón R, Giske C, Naas T, Carattoli A, Martínez-Medina M. Escherichia coli: an old friend with new tidings. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40(4):437–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):123–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadeghi H, Khoei SG, Bakht M, Rostamani M, Rahimi S, Ghaemi M, Mirzaei B. A retrospective cross-sectional survey on nosocomial bacterial infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in hospitalized patients in northwest of Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Sayed Ahmed MAE-G, Zhong L-L, Shen C, Yang Y, Doi Y, Tian G-B. Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000–2019). Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):868–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto Y, Calvopina M, Izurieta R, Villacres I, Kawahara R, Sasaki M, Yamamoto M. Colistin-resistant Escherichia coli with mcr genes in the livestock of rural small-scale farms in Ecuador. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matuschek E, Åhman J, Webster C, Kahlmeter G. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin–evaluation of seven commercial MIC products against standard broth microdilution for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(8):865–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parte A, Whitman WB, Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Trujillo ME, Ludwig W, Suzuki K-I. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: volume 5: the actinobacteria. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dasen G, Smutny J, Teuber M, Meile L. Classification and identification of propionibacteria based on ribosomal RNA genes and PCR. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998;21(2):251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wayne P. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2011.

  10. Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas M, Giske C, Harbarth S, Hindler J, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Drieux L, Brossier F, Sougakoff W, Jarlier V. Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:90–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yousefi Mashouf R, Alijani P, Saidijam M, Alikhani MY, Rashidi H. Study of antibiotic resistance pattern and phenotypic detection of ESBLs in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from clinical samples and determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of imipenem and ceftazidim antibiotics. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2014;20(4):295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burton E, Yakandawala N, LoVetri K, Madhyastha M. A microplate spectrofluorometric assay for bacterial biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;34(1):1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kar P, Behera B, Mohanty S, Jena J, Mahapatra A. Detection of colistin resistance in carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae by reference broth microdilution and comparative evaluation of three other methods. J Lab Phys. 2021;13(03):263–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ilbeigi K, Askari Badouei M, Vaezi H, Zaheri H, Aghasharif S, Kafshdouzan K. Molecular survey of mcr1 and mcr2 plasmid mediated colistin resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolates of animal origin in Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mirzaei B, Babaei R, Bazgir ZN, Goli HR, Keshavarzi S, Amiri E. Prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae spp. and its multidrug-resistant rates in clinical isolates: a two-center cross-sectional study. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(1):665–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daoud N, Hamdoun M, Hannachi H, Gharsallah C, Mallekh W, Bahri O. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli among Tunisian outpatients with community-acquired urinary tract infection (2012–2018). Current urology. 2020;14(4):200–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mostafavi SN, Rostami S, Nejad YR, Ataei B, Mobasherizadeh S, Cheraghi A, Haghighipour S, Nouri S, Pourdad A, Ataabadi P. Antimicrobial resistance in hospitalized patients with community acquired urinary tract infection in Isfahan, Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(3):187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park N-H, Lee S-J, Lee E-B, Birhanu BT, Park S-C. Colistin induces resistance through biofilm formation, via increased phoQ expression, in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Pathogens. 2021;10(11):1525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful for the support of their colleagues in medical microbiology department of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors read and approved the manuscript. Contributions of the authors in this study were as follows: BM: conceptualization, supervision, methodology, final editing, revision, AE: sample collection, BH: bacterial isolation, writing, ZS: laboratory experiment, sample collection, NK: laboratory experiment, data analysis and curation, NM: writing, data analysis and curation,

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahman Mirzaei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study complies with ethical principles and the standards for conducting clinical research and is approved by The Ethics Committee of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR.ZUMS.REC.1400.116). In the current study; all ethical guidelines including Ethics and Consent to participate have been collected. Informed consent was obtained from the patients/participants whose clinical samples have been used in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirzaei, B., Ebrahimi, A., Hariri, B. et al. Frequencies of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2) genes in clinically isolated Escherichia coli; a cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes 16, 192 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Eshershia coli
  • Antibiotic resistant
  • Colistin