Skip to main content
Download PDF

Higher peripheral blood mitochondrial DNA copy number and relative telomere length in under 48 years Indonesian breast cancer patients

BMC Research Notes volume 17, Article number: 120 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality among Indonesian women. A comprehensive investigation is required to enhance the early detection of this disease. Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and relative telomere length (RTL) have been proposed as potential biomarkers for several cancer risks, as they are linked through oxidative stress mechanisms. We conducted a case–control study to examine peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL patterns in Indonesian breast cancer patients (n = 175) and healthy individuals (n = 181). The relative ratios of mtDNA-CN and RTL were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

Results

Median values of mtDNA-CN and RTL were 1.62 and 0.70 in healthy subjects and 1.79 and 0.73 in breast cancer patients, respectively. We found a positive association between peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL (p < 0.001). In under 48 years old breast cancer patients, higher peripheral blood mtDNA-CN (mtDNA-CN ≥ 1.73 (median), p = 0.009) and RTL (continuous variable, p = 0.010) were observed, compared to the corresponding healthy subjects. We also found a significantly higher ‘High-High’ pattern of mtDNA-CN and RTL in breast cancer patients under 48 years old (p = 0.011). Our findings suggest that peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL could serve as additional minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer risk evaluation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Breast cancer has been the leading cause of cancer incidence globally in 2020 and continues to be the primary cause of cancer-related deaths among women [1, 2]. It is also the most common type of cancer in Indonesia, with a higher age-standardised death rate (15.3 per 100,000) [3] than the global mortality rate (13.6 per 100,000) in 2020 [4], indicating a relatively lower survival rate for breast cancer patient in Indonesia.

The search for non-invasive biomarkers for breast cancer screening remains a challenging process. One of these efforts involves exploring the potential utilisation of the peripheral blood mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and relative telomere length (RTL) [5,6,7].

The relationship between mitochondria and telomeres has been studied extensively, particularly in biological ageing. They are intertwined through the telomere-p53-PGC–1α-mitochondria axis and are intricately linked to oxidative stress [8]. Their functionality is commonly estimated by measuring the mtDNA-CN and RTL. Nevertheless, studies that simultaneously incorporating both biomarkers, particularly in association with breast cancer, remain limited. Independent studies with peripheral blood mtDNA-CN [6, 9,10,11,12,13] and RTL [5, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20] have also reported inconsistent findings. However, a prospective study by Campa et al. found a positive association between high peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and high RTL, along with an increased risk of breast cancer [7], suggesting that peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL could be used as minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer risk evaluation.

Our study aimed to investigate the differences in peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL between breast cancer patients and healthy subjects in Indonesia. To the best of our knowledge, such a study has not been conducted in Indonesia before. We hypothesise that there are significant differences in both biomarkers between breast cancer patients and healthy subjects, which can potentially be utilised as additional minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer risk evaluation in Indonesia.

Methods

Study design and participants

This retrospective case–control study was initially conducted between 2019 and 2020, following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria [21]. The case subjects are females diagnosed with breast cancer based on histopathology and immunohistochemistry assay, aged 19 years or older, who have not undergone any cancer therapies. The control subjects are healthy disease-free females, aged 19 years or older, without any history of cancer and chronic illnesses. Following the incorporation of incomplete data as additional exclusion criteria, this study further investigated 175 breast cancer patients and 181 healthy subjects from six public referral hospitals in Indonesia (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Approval from the Ethical Committee of Health Research at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia, was obtained under reference number 450/UN2. F1/ETIK/2018.

Clinical samples and data measurements

We analysed 356 archived peripheral blood samples stored at −70 °C. Demographic data were obtained using a self-administered questionnaire, including age, menarche age, menopause, childbirth history, breastfeeding, hormonal contraceptive use, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by height squared (m2). Serum lipid concentrations were measured after 12 h of overnight fasting, including triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and total cholesterol (TC). We also calculated the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index using the following equation: Ln[fasting TG (mg/dL) x FPG (mg/dL)/2] [22].

Measurement of peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL

Total DNA was extracted from archived peripheral blood samples using the salting-out methods. Blood samples with a total volume of 3 mL were extracted by employing Gentra® Puregene® Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Meanwhile, samples with a total volume of 1 mL were extracted using Geneius™ Micro gDNA Extraction Kit (Geneaid Biotech Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan), following both manufacturers’ instructions. Despite different extraction kits, no significant differences were found in mtDNA-CN and RTL measurement results (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Each extracted DNA sample was diluted with nuclease-free water (Ambion, Texas, USA) to a concentration of 5 ng/μL and used as a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) template. The reactions were carried out using Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Each sample was evaluated in duplicate. The mtDNA-CN [23] and RTL [24] were measured by calculating their relative ratios to Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), the single-copy nuclear-encoded reference gene. This calculation was based on the efficiency-corrected method implemented in the “qpcR” package [25]. A list of the primer pairs is provided in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Statistical analyses

Data analysis was performed using R version 4.1.2 (www.r-project.org) with R Studio (version 2021.9.2.382; www.rstudio.com). The normality of continuous variables was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Medians (interquartile ranges) were reported for non-normally distributed variables (age, BMI, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, FPG, TyG index) and evaluated using the Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney U test. Categorical variables (alcohol consumption, smoking, menarche age, menopause, childbirth history, breastfeeding, hormonal contraceptive use) were evaluated using Pearson’s chi-square test and reported as the number of samples (percentage). Since the relative ratios of mtDNA-CN and RTL were not normally distributed even after being transformed into loge, their associations were estimated using rank-based linear regression models using the “Rfit” package [26]. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the likelihood ratio test, adjusted for potential confounders. Variable selections incorporated in the model were carried out using stepwise multiple regression implemented in the “MASS” package [27]. Confounders added to the models were age, BMI, HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, TyG index, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Analyses were carried out on all subjects and sub-groups based on age (under 48 years and above 48 years subgroups). The cut-off age of 48 years was determined by the ‘SpEqualSe’ method in the “OptimalCutpoints” package, based on the equality of specificity and sensitivity values [28]. The effect size and power calculation were done using the “pwr” package [29]. Significance was indicated by a p-value of < 0.025, following Bonferroni correction.

Results

Characteristics of study participants

The characteristics of the study participants are shown in Additional file 1: Table S3. Compared to the healthy subjects, breast cancer patients had significantly higher median age (median value, healthy group vs. breast cancer group, 45 years vs. 48 years, p = 0.003) and lower BMI (p = 0.003). Several clinical characteristics also showed significant differences (all p < 0.050). Breast cancer patients had a higher TG, lower HDL-C, higher FPG, and TyG index compared to healthy subjects. The prevalences of alcohol consumption and smoking were significantly higher in breast cancer patients. Those who developed breast cancer had a notably higher frequency of childbirth history, breastfeeding for less than 12 months, and hormonal contraceptive use.

The positive association between peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL

We found a consistent positive association between peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL in all subjects and healthy and breast cancer groups. The association was found noteworthy (p < 0.001; R2 > 0.4) in each group, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The positive association between peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL. MtDNA-CN and RTL were positively associated with one another in A all samples, B healthy subjects, and C breast cancer patients

Full size image

Comparison of peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL between breast cancer patients and healthy subjects

The univariate comparison of peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL between breast cancer patients and healthy subjects is presented in Additional file 1: Fig. S2. The peripheral blood mtDNA-CN was significantly higher in the breast cancer patients compared to the healthy subjects (median value, healthy subjects vs. breast cancer patients, 1.62 vs. 1.79; p = 0.038). However, no significant differences in RTL were found between the two groups.

Additional analyses were performed on age subgroups, specifically those under and over 48 years old. Additional file 1: Fig. S3 displays the results of a univariate comparison between mtDNA-CN and RTL levels in peripheral blood samples for healthy individuals and breast cancer patients in each age subgroup (under and above 48 years). Our findings indicated that mtDNA-CN (p = 0.059) and RTL (p = 0.008) tended to be higher in healthy subjects aged 48 years and above. In contrast, RTL levels (p = 0.046) tended to be lower in breast cancer patients aged above 48 years.

We also conducted multivariate analyses in the age subgroups and presented the results as odds ratios. Breast cancer patients in the under 48 years subgroup had a significantly higher mtDNA-CN when analysed with classified median value (mtDNA-CN ≥ 1.73 (median), OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.31–6.22, p = 0.009, power = 1), and showed nominal significance when analysed as a continuous variable (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04–3.86, p = 0.040, power = 1) (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Higher peripheral blood mtDNA-CN (A) and RTL (B) in under 48 years breast cancer patients. The odds ratios of multivariate analysis for mtDNA-CN (A) and RTL (B) were presented as forest plots. The under 48 years subgroup was presented as white square (□). The above 48 years subgroup was presented as black square (■). The mtDNA-CN and RTL were analysed as a continuous variable and classified by the median value. Peripheral blood mtDNA-CN were significantly higher in under 48 years (□) breast cancer patients when analysed using the median cut-off (1.73) and nominally significant when analysed as a continuous variable. Meanwhile, peripheral blood RTL was significantly higher in under 48 years (□) breast cancer patients when being analysed as a continuous variable and nominally significant when being analysed using the median cut-off (0.71). No significant result was found in the above 48 years (■) subgroup. The likelihood ratio test was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for association studies. Potential confounders added to the models were age, BMI, HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, TyG index, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Significance was indicated by a p-value of < 0.025, following Bonferroni correction

Full size image

RTL was also higher in under 48 years breast cancer patients when analysed as a continuous variable (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.60, p = 0.010, power = 1) and showed a nominal significance when analysed with classified median value (RTL ≥ 0.71 (median), OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.06–4.85, p = 0.037, power = 1) (Fig. 2B) as compared to the corresponding healthy subjects. Meanwhile, no significant odds ratios were found in the above 48-year subgroup.

We analysed the combination patterns of mtDNA-CN and RTL in peripheral blood using their median values. Values below the median were categorised as ‘Low’, while those above were considered 'High'. The median values for mtDNA-CN and RTL are 1.73 and 0.71, respectively. Consistent with individual analysis, we identified a significantly higher ‘High-High’ pattern of mtDNA-CN and RTL in breast cancer patients under 48 years old compared to healthy subjects of the same age group (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.31–7.25, p = 0.011, power = 1). However, there were no significant differences in ‘Low–High’ and ‘High-Low’ patterns in both subgroups under and above 48 years old (p > 0.050, power = 1), as depicted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

‘High-High’ pattern of peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL in under 48 years breast cancer patients. The odds ratios of multivariate analysis for the mtDNA-CN and RTL combination pattern were presented as a forest plot. The under 48 years subgroup was presented as white square (□). The above 48 years subgroup was presented as black square (■). The combination was determined by the median value of each marker. The median cut-off is 1.73 for mtDNA-CN and 0.71 for RTL. A value below the median ( <) was classified as ‘Low’ and above the median ( ≥) as ‘High’. The ‘Low-Low’ combination was used as a reference. A ‘High-High’ combination was significantly found to be higher in under 48 years (□) breast cancer patients. No significant result was found in the above 48 years (■) subgroup. The multinomial regression test was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for association studies. Potential confounders added to the models were age, BMI, HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, TyG index, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Significance was indicated by a p-value of < 0.025, following Bonferroni correction

Full size image

Discussion

Breast cancer is a complex disease influenced by numerous factors. The development and presence of the disease contribute to systemic changes. These alterations can be observed in circulating blood, leading breast cancer to be recognised as a systemic disease [30]. Furthermore, in addition to its minimally invasive collection methods, blood circulates throughout the body and contains information regarding systemic status, e.g., the body’s response to malignancies [31]. This study observed distinct peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL patterns between Indonesian breast cancer patients and healthy subjects, particularly in the under 48 years subgroup.

The mtDNA-CN and RTL are commonly associated with the ageing process, and numerous studies have highlighted an inverse relationship between these markers and age [32, 33]. Both biomarkers exhibit dynamic regulation in response to environmental changes, mainly with antioxidant-oxidant imbalance. The lack of histone and less-adequate repair mechanism in mtDNA [34] and high-guanine residue in telomeres makes them susceptible to oxidative stress exposure [35]. Following previous studies in healthy adults [36, 37], pregnant women [38], gastric cancer tissues [39], and breast cancer patients [40], our study also found a positive association between peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL, indicating their significant interrelationship.

Our multivariate analysis revealed that breast cancer patients, particularly those under 48 years, exhibited a higher peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL than healthy subjects. An increase in peripheral blood mtDNA-CN is potentially due to the activation of mitochondrial compensatory mechanism to maintain mitochondrial function in response to prolonged oxidative stress exposure during disease progression [41,42,43,44]. The dynamic regulation of blood telomere length occurs during hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. In the case of chronic diseases like breast cancer, prolonged exposure to oxidative stress may stimulate telomere lengthening as compensation for telomere loss in hematopoietic cells, which can later be observed in the peripheral blood cells [45]. Our finding also revealed that the ‘High-High’ combined pattern of both biomarkers was predominant in breast cancer patients under 48 years, which is consistent with previous research [7].

In separate and combined mtDNA-CN and RTL analyses, the subgroup of individuals under 48 years old consistently showed statistically significant results. This observation can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, it is worth noting that 48 years corresponds to the average age of menopause for Indonesian women [46,47,48]. Secondly, younger individuals may possess a better capacity for the compensatory mechanism of mitochondria and telomeres. The differences are more pronounced when comparing a relatively younger case–control subgroup [49, 50].

The regulation of mtDNA-CN and RTL can be affected by the level and duration of exposure to oxidative stress [51, 52]. Studies have shown that breast cancer patients typically exhibit higher levels of oxidative stress compared to healthy individuals [53]. Various risk factors for breast cancer can contribute to the development of oxidative stress during breast carcinogenesis. In this study, we identified several significant differences in specific clinical parameters (TG, HDL-C, FPG, TyG index) and lifestyle factors (alcohol consumption, smoking, breastfeeding duration, hormonal contraceptive use) between the breast cancer and healthy groups (Additional file 1: Table S3). These variables are known to increase the risk of breast cancer. Alcohol consumption [54], smoking [55], and lifestyle changes that lead to alterations in serum lipid concentrations [56, 57] have been linked to increased oxidative stress levels through various mechanisms.

On the other hand, cancer cells also produce ROS due to their high metabolic rate, accumulation of genetic alterations, relative hypoxia, and persistent inflammation [58]. Therefore, the altered level of oxidative stress in breast cancer patients might have resulted from either the presence of risk factors during carcinogenesis or the production of ROS by cancer cells. Nevertheless, determining the underlying mechanisms from a case–control study perspective can be pretty challenging.

Limitations

It is important to note that this study has some limitations. Firstly, the study cannot be generalised to other populations. Secondly, we did not measure any oxidative stress markers, which could provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of mtDNA-CN and RTL regulations in breast cancer. Thirdly, the retrospective case–control study design cannot explain the direction of causation. Hence, future prospective studies enrolling other populations are warranted.

Conclusion

In summary, we have identified distinctive peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL characteristics in under 48 years breast cancer patients. This pilot case–control study for Indonesian breast cancer patients has highlighted a potential utilisation of both biomarkers as additional minimally invasive tools for enhancing early breast cancer risk evaluation.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is available in the Mendeley Data repository, doi: https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17632/v7cz97s659.1

Abbreviations

mtDNA-CN:

Mitochondrial DNA copy number

RTL:

Relative telomere length

qPCR:

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

OR:

Odds ratio

95% CI:

95% Confidence interval

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

TG:

Triglycerides

TC:

Total cholesterol

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

TyG index:

Triglyceride and glucose index

HDL-C:

High density lipoprotein-cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol

PGC-1α:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 alpha

B2M:

Beta-2 microglobulin

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. GLOBOCAN. Breast Fact Sheets. 2019. p. 2. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/20-Breast-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020.

  4. GLOBOCAN. Indonesia fact sheets. 2019. p. 2. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/360-indonesia-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020.

  5. Pellatt AJ, Wolff RK, Torres-Mejia G, John EM, Herrick JS, Lundgreen A, et al. Telomere length, telomere-related genes, and breast cancer risk: the breast cancer health disparities study. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2013;52(7):595–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemnrau A, Brook MN, Fletcher O, Coulson P, Tomczyk K, Jones M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in peripheral blood cells and risk of developing breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2015;75(14):2844–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campa D, Barrdahl M, Santoro A, Severi G, Baglietto L, Omichessan H, et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number variation, leukocyte telomere length, and breast cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0955-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahin E, DePinho RA. Axis of ageing: telomeres, p53 and mitochondria. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(6):397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Xia P, An HX, Dang CX, Radpour R, Kohler C, Fokas E, et al. Decreased mitochondrial DNA content in blood samples of patients with stage I breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen J, Platek M, Mahasneh A, Ambrosone CB, Zhao H. Mitochondrial copy number and risk of breast cancer: a pilot study. Mitochondrion. 2010;10(1):62–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen J, Wan J, Song R, Zhao H. Peripheral blood mitochondrial DNA copy number, length heteroplasmy and breast cancer risk: a replication study. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36(11):1307–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgv130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Thyagarajan B, Wang R, Nelson H, Barcelo H, Koh WP, Yuan JM. Mitochondrial DNA copy number is associated with breast cancer risk. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):65968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao H, Chang D, Ye Y, Shen J, Chow WH, Wu X, et al. Associations of blood mitochondrial DNA copy number with social-demographics and cancer risk: results from the Mano-A-Mano Mexican American Cohort. Oncotarget. 2018;9(39):25491–502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Svenson U, Ljungberg B, Roos G. Telomere length in peripheral blood predicts survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69(7):2896–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gramatges MM, Telli ML, Balise R, Ford JM. Longer relative telomere length in blood from women with sporadic and familial breast cancer compared with healthy controls longer telomeres in breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(2):605–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Samavat H, Xun X, Jin A, Wang R, Koh WP, Yuan JM. Association between prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and breast cancer risk: the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1133-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen J, Gammon MD, Terry MB, Wang Q, Bradshaw P, Teitelbaum SL, et al. Telomere length, oxidative damage, antioxidants and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(7):1637–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pooley KA, Sandhu MS, Tyrer J, Shah M, Driver KE, Luben RN, et al. Telomere length in prospective and retrospective cancer case-control studies. Cancer Res. 2010;70(8):3170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma H, Zhou Z, Wei S, Liu Z, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, et al. Shortened telomere length is associated with increased risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6): e20466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Duggan C, Risques R, Alfano C, Prunkard D, Imayama I, Holte S, et al. Change in peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and mortality in breast cancer survivors. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(4): dju035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Panigoro SS, Sutandyo N, Witjaksono F, Siregar NC, Ramli R, Hariani R, et al. The association between triglyceride-glucose index as a marker of insulin resistance and the risk of breast cancer. Front Endocrinol. 2021;11(12):1244.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guerrero-Romero F, Simental-Mendía LE, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Ramos-Zavala MG, Hernández-González SO, et al. The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity: comparison with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Venegas V, Wang J, Dimmock D, Wong LJ. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of mitochondrial DNA content. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg1907s68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Callaghan NJ, Dhillon VS, Thomas P, Fenech M. A quantitative real-time PCR method for absolute telomere length. Biotechniques. 2008;44(6):807–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ritz C, Spiess AN. qpcR: an R package for sigmoidal model selection in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(13):1549–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kloke JD, McKean JW. Rfit: Rank-based estimation for linear models. R J. 2012;4(2):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ripley B, Venables B, Bates DM, Hornik K, Gebhardt A, Firth D. Support functions and datasets for venables and ripley’s MASS. 2022. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/MASS.pdf. Accessed 06 Apr 2023.

  28. Lopez-Raton M, Xose Rodriguez-Alvarez M. Computing optimal cutpoints in diagnostic tests. 2021. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/OptimalCutpoints/OptimalCutpoints.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2023.

  29. Champley S, Ekstrom C, Dalgaard P, Gill J, Weibelzahl S, Anandkumar A, et al. pwr: basic functions for power analysis. R Package version 13-0. 2017; p. 1–22. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/. Accessed 24 June 2023

  30. Kim R, Kin T. Reconsidering the meaning of curing primary breast cancer as a systemic disease. Front Oncol. 2021;18(11):696.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohr S, Liew CC. The peripheral-blood transcriptome: new insights into disease and risk assessment. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13(10):422–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang R, Wang Y, Ye K, Picard M, Gu Z. Independent impacts of aging on mitochondrial DNA quantity and quality in humans. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4287-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vyas CM, Ogata S, Reynolds CF, Mischoulon D, Chang G, Cook NR, et al. Lifestyle and behavioral factors and mitochondrial DNA copy number in a diverse cohort of mid-life and older adults. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8): e0237235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Salgado J, Honorato B, García-Foncillas J. Review: mitochondrial defects in breast cancer. Clin Med Oncol. 2008;2:199–207. https://doi.org/10.4137/CMO.S524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Coluzzi E, Colamartino M, Cozzi R, Leone S, Meneghini C, O’Callaghan N, et al. Oxidative stress induces persistent telomeric DNA damage responsible for nuclear morphology change in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10): e110963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim JH, Kim HK, Ko JH, Bang H, Lee DC. The relationship between leukocyte mitochondrial DNA copy number and telomere length in community-dwelling elderly women. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6): e67227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tyrka AR, Carpenter LL, Kao HT, Porton B, Philip NS, Ridout SJ, et al. Association of telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number in a community sample of healthy adults. Exp Gerontol. 2015;1(66):17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Qiu C, Enquobahrie DA, Gelaye B, Hevner K, Williams MA. The association between leukocyte telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number in pregnant women: a pilot study. Clin Lab. 2015;61(3–4):363–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jung SJ, Cho JH, Park WJ, Heo YR, Lee JH. Telomere length is correlated with mitochondrial DNA copy number in intestinal, but not diffuse, gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(1):925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Park WJ, Lee JH. Positive correlation between telomere length and mitochondrial copy number in breast cancers. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(8):23–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee HC, Yin PH, Lu CY, Chi CW, Wei YH. Increase of mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA in response to oxidative stress in human cells. Biochem J. 2000;348(Pt 2):425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu CS, Tsai CS, Kuo CL, Chen HW, Lii CK, Ma YS, et al. Oxidative stress-related alteration of the copy number of mitochondrial DNA in human leukocytes. Free Radic Res. 2003;37(12):1307–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shen M, Zhang L, Bonner MR, Liu CS, Li G, Vermeulen R, et al. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number, blood cell counts, and occupational benzene exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008;49(6):453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng J, Ninghua C, Zhang S, Xuebin W, Ming L. Leukocyte mitochondrial DNA copy number and risk of thyroid cancer: a two-stage case-control study. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu J, Hwang SS, Liesa M, Gan B, Sahin E, Jaskelioff M, et al. Antitelomerase therapy provokes ALT and mitochondrial adaptive mechanisms in cancer. Cell. 2012;148(4):651–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Yohanis M, Tiro E, Irianta T. Women in the rural areas experience more severe menopause symptoms. Indones J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;37(2):86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sepduwiana H. Usia Menopaouse pada Wanita di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Rambah Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. J Martenity Neonatal. 2017;4(1):145–53.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dewi V. Association of socio-economic and demographic factors with Indonesian women’s premature menopause: analysis of the demographic and health surveys program (DHS) of 2017. Stud Ethno-Med. 2021;20:15.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Santos JM, Tewari S, Kowluru RA. A compensatory mechanism protects retinal mitochondria from initial insult in diabetic retinopathy. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(9):1729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Grandin N, Pereira B, Cohen C, Billard P, Dehais C, Carpentier C, et al. The level of activity of the alternative lengthening of telomeres correlates with patient age in IDH-mutant ATRX-loss-of-expression anaplastic astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):1–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Solsona-Vilarrasa E, Fucho R, Torres S, Nuñez S, Nuño-Lámbarri N, Enrich C, et al. Cholesterol enrichment in liver mitochondria impairs oxidative phosphorylation and disrupts the assembly of respiratory supercomplexes. Redox Biol. 2019;24:101214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hou L, Joyce BT, Gao T, Liu L, Zheng Y, Penedo FJ, et al. Blood telomere length attrition and cancer development in the normative aging study cohort. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(6):591–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bhattacharjee J, Jogdand S, Shinde RK, Goswami S. Assessment of oxidative stress in breast cancer patients: a hospital based study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2018;7(5):966–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nagamma T, Bhutia RD, Pokharel DR, Yadav S, Baxi J. Influence of alcohol consumption on oxidative stress and antioxidant status in cancer patients—case-control study from western Nepal. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3513–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Nagamma T, Baxi J, Singh PP. Status of oxidative stress and antioxidant levels in smokers with breast cancer from western Nepal. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(21):9467–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang RL, Shi YH, Hao G, Li W, Le GW. Increasing oxidative stress with progressive hyperlipidemia in human: relation between malondialdehyde and atherogenic index. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2008;43(3):154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Gupta RK, Patel AK, Kumari R, Chugh S, Shrivastav C, Mehra S, et al. Interactions between oxidative stress, lipid profile and antioxidants in breast cancer: a case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(12):6295–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Movahed ZG, Rastegari-Pouyani M, Hossein Mohammadi M, Mansouri K. Cancer cells change their glucose metabolism to overcome increased ROS: One step from cancer cell to cancer stem cell? Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to all the patients who participated in the study. We also thank PT. Prodia Widyahusada Tbk. for their support of this study.

Funding

This study was supported by a block grant from the Government of Republic of Indonesia through the Ministry of Research and Technology for the Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Master’s Programme in Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Prisca C. Limardi & Safarina G. Malik

  2. Genome Diversity and Diseases Laboratory, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Prisca C. Limardi, Lidwina Priliani, Sukma Oktavianthi & Safarina G. Malik

  3. Genome Diversity and Diseases Division, Mochtar Riady Institute for Nanotechnology, Jl. Boulevard Jenderal Sudirman 1688, Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Banten, 15811, Indonesia

    Prisca C. Limardi, Lidwina Priliani, Sukma Oktavianthi & Safarina G. Malik

  4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Sonar Soni Panigoro

  5. Department of Anatomical Pathology, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Nurjati Chairani Siregar

  6. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Dharmais Hospital National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Noorwati Sutandyo

  7. Department of Nutrition, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Fiastuti Witjaksono

Authors
  1. Prisca C. Limardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonar Soni Panigoro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nurjati Chairani Siregar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noorwati Sutandyo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fiastuti Witjaksono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lidwina Priliani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sukma Oktavianthi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Safarina G. Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SSP, NCS, NS, FW, and SGM conceived and designed the study. PCL performed the experiments. PCL, LP, SO, SGM performed the data analysis, wrote, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safarina G. Malik.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in 2019 to 2020 with written informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Health Research of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia (450/UN2. F1/ETIK/2018). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Figure S1. Flow diagram of the healthy subjects and breast cancer (BC) patients' enrolment Table S1. Comparison of mtDNA-CN and RTL between extraction methods Table S2. List of primer pairs Table S3. Characteristics of study participants Figure S2. Univariate comparison of peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL between healthy subjects and breast cancer patients Figure S3. Univariate comparison of peripheral blood mtDNA-CN and RTL between under and above 48 years subgroup in healthy subjects and breast cancer patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Limardi, P.C., Panigoro, S.S., Siregar, N.C. et al. Higher peripheral blood mitochondrial DNA copy number and relative telomere length in under 48 years Indonesian breast cancer patients. BMC Res Notes 17, 120 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06783-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06783-y

Keywords

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us