Skip to main content

Isolation of lytic bacteriophages and their relationships with the adherence genes of Staphylococcus saprophyticus

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to introduce a lytic bacteriophage against Staphylococcus saprophyticus from wastewater in Gorgan, northern Iran.

Results

The vB_SsapS-46 phage was isolated from urban wastewater and formed round and clear plaques on bacterial culture. It was visualized by electron microscopy and had a large head (approximately 106 nm) and a long tail (approximately 150 nm), indicating that it belongs to the Siphoviridae family. The host range of vB_SsapS-46 was determined using a spot test on 35 S. saprophyticus clinical isolates, and it was able to lyse 12 of the 35 clinical isolates (34%). Finally, the relationship between phage sensitivity and adherence genes was assessed, revealing no significant correlation between phage sensitivity and the frequency of adherence genes. The vB_SsapS-46 phage can be used alone or in a mixture in future studies to control urinary tract infections caused by this bacterium, especially in the elimination of drug-resistant pathogens.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Staphylococcus saprophyticus has been identified as the second causative agent of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in young females. This bacterium is associated with several complications, including pyelonephritis, cystitis, and in some cases, blood infections. Generally, S. saprophyticus is present in humans as part of the normal flora of the skin, perineum, urethra, cervix, rectum, and gastrointestinal tract. In 1961, Torres Pereira isolated a coagulase-negative Staphylococcus carrying 51 antigens from the urine of women with acute UTI. The organism was later classified as part of subgroup 3 of Micrococcus, which was subsequently identified as S. saprophyticus [1, 2].

Overall, S. saprophyticus isolates are typically considered sensitive to antibiotics commonly used to treat UTIs, as proposed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [3]. The first-line antibiotics typically used are trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nitrofurantoin; however, recent studies have reported resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. This alarming trend requires more attention, highlighting the importance of assessing resistance patterns when choosing antibiotics and necessitating the development of alternative therapies. Thus, it is crucial to select and study the biological properties of new phages against uropathogenic bacteria, particularly S. saprophyticus, and create a cocktail phage for the treatment of UTIs [4, 5].

The therapeutic use of phages has several advantages. Recently, bacteriophages have been used as novel antibacterial agents for reducing pathogenic bacteria and their biofilms; therefore, lytic bacteriophages could have various applications as biocontrol agents and in phage therapy [6, 7]. The first study to introduce phages of coagulase-negative staphylococci, including S. saprophyticus, by mitomycin C induction was in 1991 [8]. In 2018, in Iran’s Golestan province, the first report of a lytic phage against S. saprophyticus (vB_SsapS-104) from hospital wastewater was published [9]. Consequently, given the limited research on bacteriophages of S. saprophyticus, a new project was conducted in 2021 using two approaches: isolation and identification of more lytic bacteriophages from urban and hospital wastewater against S. saprophyticus due to the bacteria entering the wastewater through urine, and genomic examination of bacteriophages for registration with the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). Phages exhibiting lytic activity against multidrug-resistant isolates have attracted considerable attention as alternative antibiotics. The antibacterial activities of phages against staphylococcal species such as Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus have been extensively demonstrated [10,11,12,13]. However, only two studies have reported lytic phages against S. saprophyticus. The present study aimed to isolate a lytic phage from wastewater against S. saprophyticus in Golestan Province, northern Iran.

Materials and methods

Bacterial isolation and characterization

Thirty-five S. saprophyticus isolates from UTI patients were collected from Landa Laboratories and Moosavi Hospital in Golestan Province, Iran, and were used as hosts for phage isolation from wastewater samples. The S. saprophyticus isolates were initially revived and re-identified through biochemical and molecular tests [14].

Phage isolation

Raw municipal and hospital sewage from Hakim, Sayad Shirazi, Talghani, and Azar hospitals were collected to isolate specific phages in Golestan Province, Iran. The sewage samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the supernatant was mixed with Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth containing the S. saprophyticus isolates. After incubation, the suspension was centrifuged, and the supernatant was filtered using a 0.22 μm filter (Gilson, UK). Following this, 10 µL of the filtrate was mixed with 100 µL of bacterial culture in melted BHI with 0.7% agar and then poured onto a plate of BHI agar. The plates were incubated at 37 °C, and plaques appeared after overnight incubation [15].

Purification and titration

To obtain a pure suspension, a single plaque was picked with a pipette, transferred to a tube containing a culture of the bacterial host in BHI broth, and then incubated. After 24 h, the mixture was centrifuged and examined for plaque formation using the double-layer agar method. All steps were repeated three times. To determine the titration of phage particles, 100 µL of the phage lysates were serially diluted 10-fold into 900 µL of microtubes containing 900 µL SM buffer (8 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 99 mM NaCl, 0.01 mM gelatin, pH 7). Then, 100 µL of the bacterial host culture from each dilution was added to 10 mL of BHI soft agar at 45 °C and poured onto BHI agar. Finally, after 24 h of incubation, the dilution that included 30 to 300 plaques was counted [16].

Host range determination

The lytic activity and host range were determined using the spot test method. For this purpose, 35 clinical strains of S. saprophyticus were cultured on separate plates, and 10 µL of the purified suspension was spotted on the center of each plate and incubated at 37 °C. After incubation, the clear zones that appeared were indicative of susceptibility to phages. These assays were performed on several standard gram-positive and gram-negative strains such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa 27,853, Staphylococcus epidermidis 1435, Proteus mirabilis 43,071, Escherichia coli 25,922, Shigella flexneri 12,022, Enterococcus faecalis 29,212, and Staphylococcus aureus 25,923 [17].

Electron microscopy

To study the morphology of phages using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), 10 µL of the concentrated phage suspension was placed onto a copper grid covered with carbon and allowed to absorb for 5 min. The copper grid was then stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 1 min. The copper grid was washed thoroughly with distilled water and air-dried. Finally, the particles were examined using a Philips transmission electron microscope (Philips, Em208s) at the Rastak Lab (Tehran) at 100 kV [17].

Correlation between virulence factors and sensitivity to the phage

The association between the presence of adhesion genes in bacterial isolates and phage sensitivity was investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the fibronectin-binding autolysin (Aas), surface-associated lipase (Ssp), collagen-binding serine-aspartate-repeat protein (sdrI), and uro-adherence factor A (UafA) genes, as described previously [18]. Some positive samples were sequenced (Macrogen Co., South Korea). In addition, sequences were identified using BLAST and deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

Statistical analysis

Data in this study were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.3.1 software. A chi-square test was conducted to evaluate the relationship between sensitivity to phage and the presence of surface adhesion proteins. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.

Result

Bacterial identification

All S. saprophyticus isolates were recovered from women with UTI aged 4 to 65 years. As expected, the majority of cases (91.3%) were outpatients, and only three S. saprophyticus isolates were collected from hospitalized patients. PCR was performed using specific primers to identify the 16SrRNA gene. The sequences were deposited in GenBank. Accession numbers: MW453017,MW453018,MW453019,MW453020,MW453016,MW453021,MW453014, MW453022, MW453023, MW453015,MW453024.

Isolation of bacteriophage

Lytic bacteriophages were isolated from municipal wastewater using the double-layer technique, and the vB_SsapS-46 phage created plaques with a diameter of 7 mm without a halo in the lawn of S. saprophyticus 46; therefore, it was considered the host bacterium. According to Kropinski et al., the phage was named vB_SsapS-46 (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Presence of bacteriophage in the studied samples. Plaque morphology of the vB_SsapS-46 Phage cultured on the S. saprophyticus isolate, forming 7 mm plaques without any halo

Fig. 2
figure 2

Titration of vB_SsapS-46 phage (A) 10− 2 dilution, (B) 10− 3 dilution, (C) 10 − 4 dilution, and (D) 10-5 dilution

The host range of VB_SsapS-46

The host range of vB_SsapS-46 was determined using 35 S. saprophyticus isolates and other clinical strains. The results showed that phage vB_SsapS-46 lysed 12 S. saprophyticus isolates (34%), reflecting the host specificity of S. saprophyticus isolates. Moreover, vB_SsapS-46 did not infect any other isolates (Table 1).

Table 1 Lytic activity of phage VB_SsapS-46 on different bacterial species

Morphology of phage VB_SsapS-46

Transmission electron microscopy analysis indicated that phage particles had an icosahedral head and a tail length with 106 nm and 150 nm diameters, respectively. Based on morphology, the vB_SsapS-46 phage belongs to the Siphoviridae family according to the ICTV classification system (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Micrograph of phage VB_SsapS-46 by transmission electron micrograph (TEM). Bar, 200 nm

Relation between sensitivity to phage and presence of adherence genes

Table 2 showed that seven adherence gene/spot profiles (A-G) were found. Profile “B” was the most frequent pattern, accounting for 42% (n = 15) of all bacterial isolates. Group “G” accounted for 2.8% (n = 1) of bacterial isolates. Likewise, there was no significant relationship between sensitivity to phage and the presence of adherence genes (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Accession numbers: OP696966, OP696967, OP973206.

Table 2 Concurrency of Presence virulence factor genes and phage sensitivity among S.saprophyticus isolates

Discussion

UTI are among the most common human infections. It is estimated that 150 million people are affected annually by UTI. Further, 17–29 $ are spent on the treatment and recovery of hospital infections, of which 39% are related to the costs caused by UTIs every year [19, 20].

S. saprophyticus is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus that causes uncomplicated UTI in young and sexually active women. In addition, more than half of women are colonized by this bacterium in the rectum and urethra [1]. S. saprophyticus expresses surface proteins that attach to the uroepithelium and secretes various enzymes that can survive in the urinary environment [21].

In this study, the specific and single-species lytic phage VB_SsapS-46 against S. saprophyticus was isolated from municipal wastewater. In a study by Elizbarashvili et al., phages vB_S.s. 1 and vB_S.s. 2 against S. saprophyticus were isolated from rivers in Georgia [22]. According to Yazdi et al., phage vB_SsapS-104 is effective against this bacterium obtained from hospital wastewater in Iran [9]. These findings show that the isolated bacteriophages are highly stable and active in various aqueous environments such as hospitals, municipal sewage, and rivers. Hence, they can easily survive under various conditions, such as different temperatures, chemicals, and rays.

Determining the host range helps define the biological characteristics of the phage and is a critical step in phage therapy. The host range of our isolated phage was examined on 35 clinical S. saprophyticus strains by the spot test. Phage VB_SsapS-46 was able to attack 12 clinical strains (34%) of S. saprophyticus. Elizbarashvili et al. and Yazdi et al. found that S. saprophyticus bacteriophages could also lyse strains (9%) and (88.8%), respectively [9, 22]. More than 95% of isolated phages belong to the order Caudovirales. Most phages with non-contractile tails are related to the family Siphoviridae. Electron microscopy surveying showed that the isolated phage belongs to the Siphoviridae family, consistent with previous studies results [9, 22].

Numerous factors, such as the infectious capacity of the organism, host interaction, and amount of inoculum, interact to cause infection. Colonization is the first event that leads to the onset of infection, and uropathogenic bacteria such as S. saprophyticus have proteins attached to their cell surface [1, 23]. These adhesions, essential for the initial attachment, mediate binding to tissue receptors and uroepithelial cells. The first stage of bacteriophage infection involves the adsorption of receptors on the bacterial cell surface. Phages can bind to these surface receptors and enter and lyse bacterial hosts [24]. Previous study assessed at least four virulence factor genes related to urinary tract colonization by S. saprophyticus [18, 21].

The most common virulence gene detected in these isolates was Aas, which is a multifunctional protein with adhesive properties that binds to fibronectin. The next most frequent virulence gene was UafA, which mediates adherence to human bladder epithelial cells [18]. Findings suggest that there is no direct correlation between these surface receptors and the capacity to enter the bacterial host. The VB_SsapS-46 phage may utilize other cell surface proteins (which also serve as phage receptors) within the bacterial host.We found one S. saprophyticus isolate (Table 2, Group G), which does not have any adherence gene and is resistant to the VB_SsapS-46 phage; therefore, complete sequencing of this isolate is interesting and should be performed in future studies.

Conclusion

While various studies of phages infecting Staphylococcus bacteria have received considerable attention, those infecting S. saprophyticus have been less thoroughly investigated. This study introduced phage vB_SsapS-46 as a biocontrol to prevent the growth of S. saprophyticus, which causes UTI. Based on morphology, the isolated phage belongs to the Siphoviridae family. Its specificity for S. saprophyticus isolates emphasizes the potential of phage vB_SsapS-46 for therapeutic use. However, further research on the antibacterial application of this phage in vivo is required.

Limitations

A limitation of this study may be the difficult and time-consuming isolation of the phage.

Data availability

The accession numbers of the deposited genes in GenBank were added in the Availability of Data section.

References

  1. Kline KA, Lewis AL. Gram-positive uropathogens, polymicrobial urinary tract infection, and the emerging microbiota of the urinary tract. Urinary tract infections: molecular pathogenesis and clinical management. 2017:459–502.

  2. Pereira AT. Coagulase-negative strains of staphylococcus possessing antigen 51 as agents of urinary infection. J Clin Pathol. 1962;15(3):252–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel JB, Cockerill F, Bradford PA. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-fifth informational supplement. 2015.

  4. Ferreira AM, Bonesso MF, Mondelli AL, Camargo CH, Cunha MLR. Oxacillin resistance and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and other staphylococci isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Chemotherapy. 2013;58(6):482–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hashemzadeh M, Dezfuli A, Nashibi R, Jahangirimehr F, Akbarian Z. Study of biofilm formation, structure and antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus strains causing urinary tract infection in women in Ahvaz, Iran. New Microbes New Infections. 2021;39:100831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clokie MR, Millard AD, Letarov AV, Heaphy S. Phages in nature. Bacteriophage. 2011;1(1):31–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Leitner L, Sybesma W, Chanishvili N, Goderdzishvili M, Chkhotua A, Ujmajuridze A, et al. Bacteriophages for treating urinary tract infections in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. BMC Urol. 2017;17:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira AT, Cristino JM. Phage typing of Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Epidemiol Infect. 1991;107(3):557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yazdi M, Bouzari M, Ghaemi EA. Isolation and characterization of a potentially novel Siphoviridae phage (vB_SsapS-104) with lytic activity against Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from urinary tract infection. Folia Microbiol. 2019;64:283–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoshiba H, Uchiyama J, Kato S-i, Ujihara T, Muraoka A, Daibata M, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage, ϕMR25, and its therapeutic potential. Arch Virol. 2010;155:545–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Melo LD, Sillankorva S, Ackermann H-W, Kropinski AM, Azeredo J, Cerca N. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis phage vB_SepS_SEP9–a unique member of the Siphoviridae family. Res Microbiol. 2014;165(8):679–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’flaherty S, Ross R, Flynn J, Meaney W, Fitzgerald G, Coffey A. Isolation and characterization of two anti-staphylococcal bacteriophages specific for pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus associated with bovine infections. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41(6):482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang L, Bao H, Wei C, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Wang R. Characterization and partial genomic analysis of a lytic myoviridae bacteriophage against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dairy cows with mastitis in mid-east of China. Virus Genes. 2015;50:111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rafiee M, Tabarraei A, Yazdi M, Mohebbi A, Ghaemi EA. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates causing urinary tract infections in Gorgan, North of Iran. Med Lab J. 2023;17(2):33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rafiei S, Bouzari M. Genomic analysis of vB_PaS-HSN4 bacteriophage and its antibacterial activity (in vivo and in vitro) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yazdi M, Bouzari M, Ghaemi EA. Isolation and characterization of a lytic bacteriophage (vB_PmiS-TH) and its application in combination with ampicillin against planktonic and biofilm forms of Proteus mirabilis isolated from urinary tract infection. Microb Physiol. 2018;28(1):37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yazdi M, Bouzari M, Ghaemi EA, Shahin K. Isolation, characterization and genomic analysis of a novel bacteriophage VB_EcoS-Golestan infecting multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infection. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rafiee M, Ghaemi EA. Detection of virulence genes among Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from women with urinary tract infections: first report from Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2023;16(1):206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Öztürk R, Murt A. Epidemiology of urological infections: a global burden. World J Urol. 2020;38:2669–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shirvani M, Keramati A, Esmaeli M. Evaluating the pattern of antibiotic resistance of urinary tract infection (UTI)-causing bacteria in the urine culture samples of patients in the infectious ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Kermanshah, in Iran from 2016–2018. Afr J Urol. 2023;29(1):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kleine B, Gatermann S, Sakinc T. Genotypic and phenotypic variation among Staphylococcus saprophyticus from human and animal isolates. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elizbarashvili M, Darsavelidze M, Suladze T, Gunia S, Dadunashvili M. Isolation and characterization of virulent phages of Staphylococcus saprophyticus. World Wide J Multidisciplinary Res Dev. 2021;7(11):47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med. 2002;113(1):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertozzi Silva J, Storms Z, Sauvageau D. Host receptors for bacteriophage adsorption. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(4):fnw002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Department of Microbiology at Golestan University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

This study was financially supported by a grant from Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E GH and M R designed the study. M R performed the experiments. E GH, A T and M Y analyzed data. M R wrote the original draft. E Gh and A T reviewed the manuscript and revised it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezzat Allah Ghaemi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR.GOUMS.REC.1397.339) approved and evaluated this study. This Committee waived the requirement for informed consent. The experiments were performed using bacteria isolated from inpatients and outpatients. The patients did not directly participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rafiee, M., Tabarraei, A., yazdi, M. et al. Isolation of lytic bacteriophages and their relationships with the adherence genes of Staphylococcus saprophyticus. BMC Res Notes 17, 200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06864-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06864-y

Keywords