Skip to main content

Phenotypic assessment of Cox10 variants and their implications for Leigh Syndrome

Abstract

Objectives

Cox10 is an enzyme required for the activity of cytochrome c oxidase. Humans who lack at least one functional copy of Cox10 have a form of Leigh Syndrome, a genetic disease that is usually fatal in infancy. As more human genomes are sequenced, new alleles are being discovered; whether or not these alleles encode functional proteins remains unclear. Thus, we set out to measure the phenotypes of many human Cox10 variants by expressing them in yeast cells.

Results

We successfully expressed the reference sequence and 25 variants of human Cox10 in yeast. We quantitated the ability of these variants to support growth on nonfermentable media and directly measured cytochrome c oxidase activity. 11 of these Cox10 variants supported approximately half or more the cytochrome c oxidase activity compared to the reference sequence. All of the strains containing those 11 variants also grew robustly using a nonfermentable carbon source. Cells expressing the other variants showed low cytochrome c oxidase activity and failed to grow on nonfermentable media.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Leigh Syndrome is a rare genetic condition characterized by progressive neuromuscular defects. This disorder is highly heterogeneous, due in part to the fact that it can be caused by alterations in at least 75 different genes. All of these genetic alterations lead to mitochondrial dysfunction including reduced or eliminated capacity for oxidative phosphorylation [1]. Notably, loss of function in one of these genes, COX10, leads to a severe form of Leigh Syndrome that is typically fatal in the first year of life (Table 1). Two patients have been reported to survive longer, albeit with significant pathology [2, 3].

The Cox10 protein is highly conserved in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae; indeed, expression of the human COX10 gene in yeast can fully restore function in a strain missing its endogenous COX10 gene [4]. The Cox10 enzyme is located on the mitochondrial inner membrane and catalyzes the farnesylation of heme [5]. This modified heme group is incorporated as an essential prosthetic group into the cytochrome c oxidase (COX) enzyme, which catalyzes the transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to molecular oxygen.

Eleven different point mutations in the human COX10 gene have been described in the literature as leading to disease in humans (Table 1). Of course, there are many more alleles in the human population and for the majority of these we have no direct evidence as to whether or not they encode functional proteins. As of June 17, 2024, the ClinVar database lists 102 known variants of the Cox10 protein, of which nearly three-quarters are of “uncertain significance”. We have selected 25 COX10 alleles for characterization in yeast. This additional knowledge should be useful to clinicians and genetic counselors faced with patients carrying these variants.

Table 1 Known pathological variants of human COX10

Methods

Expression of human COX10 alleles in yeast

A cDNA encoding the reference sequence of human Cox10 was directly synthesized by Eurofins Genomics. To allow for proper expression, this construct included 500 bp upstream and 100 bp downstream of the yeast COX10 gene. Additionally, three copies myc epitope tag just before the stop codon were included along with EcoRI sites to facilitate cloning. This DNA was inserted into the EcoRI site of YEplac195 [11] for expression in yeast. The resulting plasmid was either used directly or mutated by whole-plasmid PCR using the Q5 site-directed mutagenesis kit (New England Biolabs) so that it encoded the various alleles. Oligonucleotides used for mutagenesis are listed in Table S1. Plasmids were sequenced to confirm successful mutagenesis. The COX10 gene of BY4741 strain of S. cerevisiae was replaced with the kanMX6 gene [12] using the oligonucleotide primers shown in Table S1. Wildtype and mutant plasmids were transformed [13] into the cox10Δ yeast for phenotypic analysis.

Growth assessment

Standard yeast media and growth conditions were used throughout these experiments [13]. Ten-fold serial dilutions of freshly grown yeast were plated onto rich media containing either 2% glucose or 3% glycerol and allowed to grow at 30oC for three days before photographing.

COX assays

Yeast were grown overnight at 30oC with shaking in 15 mL of rich media using 3% raffinose as a carbon source. Raffinose supports growth by cells with and without functional oxidative phosphorylation but does not suppress mitochondrial production like glucose [14]. Cells were washed and lysed in 500 µL cold SH buffer (0.6 M sorbitol, 25 mM HEPES pH 7.4) by vortexing with glass beads for five minutes. Unlysed cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 600 g at 4oC for five minutes, twice. Mitochondria were pelleted by centrifugation at 16,000 g at 4oC for ten minutes and were resuspended in 200 µL of SH buffer [14]. 20 µL of each sample was incubated with 125 µg of reduced cytochrome c in 25 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.2. Absorbance was measured at 550 nm every five seconds for one minute to calculate the rate of cytochrome c oxidation [15]. Reaction rates were normalized to the amount of protein in the lysate as found by the BCA reaction (Pierce). Each sample was measured at least four times.

Results and discussion

We selected 25 human COX10 alleles whose functions are not clearly understood and expressed them in yeast lacking the endogenous COX10 to determine how functional the encoded proteins are. This species grows efficiently by anaerobic metabolism and therefore can survive without functional Cox10 protein when provided with a fermentable carbon source like glucose (Fig. 1A, left column). However, carbon sources like glycerol can only be utilized aerobically and thus require a functional Cox10 enzyme. On this fuel source, cells lacking Cox10 do not survive but they thrive if they contain either the yeast or human reference sequence COX10. Strains with certain COX10 alleles, such as S103A or V356M, survive equally as well as those with the reference sequence COX10. Other strains, such as those with I127T or Q322P, fail to grow when cultured on glycerol (Fig. 1A, right column), indicating that these protein variants are nonfunctional.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Activity of human COX10 variants. (A) Ten-fold serial dilutions of yeast cells carrying the indicated COX10 variant or an empty vector were plated on rich media with either glucose or glycerol as the carbon source. (B) The same strains were lysed and COX activity was measured. The resulting specific activities were normalized to the sample containing the human COX10 reference sequence. Error bars show one standard deviation

We also directly measured the COX activity in each of these yeast strains. We found that the yeast COX10 supports slightly more COX activity than the human reference sequence COX10, in agreement with a previously published observation [4]. Yeast strains with certain human COX10 alleles show activities that are close to that provided by the reference sequence while others show very low activities (Fig. 1B).

Unsurprisingly, there is a strong, general correlation between the COX activity measurements and the ability to grow on glycerol. It appears that Cox10 variants that allow approximately 50% of the reference sequence COX activity (see variants S103A, P104L and A328T) grow very efficiently on glycerol and those that allow less than 25% of the reference sequence COX activity (such as I127T and D132Y) fail to grow at all (Fig. 1).

Among the 16 assayed alleles classified as “uncertain significance” by the ClinVar database [16], we find that six (S103A, D152Y, A174T, F209L, C343R, V356M) encode functional proteins. Four alleles are classified as having “conflicting classifications of pathogenicity”; we find that three of these alleles (P104L, A328T and R431W) encode functional proteins and one (T87I) does not. T221A is classified as “likely pathogenic” and T28I is classified as “benign/likely benign”; our data disagree with these two predictions. We believe that our in vivo measurements of the activity of these alleles will provide important, actionable information for clinicians and genetic counselors who may come across patients with these alleles in their practices.

The D336V and R339W alleles were selected for a slightly different reason. Pitceathly et al. have reported that a human with these two alleles survived to adulthood and that both alleles encode nonfunctional proteins [2]. We thought that using more sensitive enzyme assays might reveal partial activity from one or both proteins but found that both are fully nonfunctional (Fig. 1). Recently, a second patient with unusual COX10 alleles has been described who survived past infancy [3]. This patient is homozygous for two alleles, T14I and T377I. The second variant is highly similar to the T380I variant that we found to be nonfunctional in that both alterations are located in the sixth transmembrane domain [17], strongly suggesting that the patient’s Cox10 protein will be nonfunctional. Thus, it remains unclear how either patient has survived when most people with nonfunctional Cox10 variants die in infancy (Table 1). Perhaps specific alleles of other genes found in these patients can partially suppress the loss-of-function in COX10. Identifying these genes could potentially point to interventions to treat Leigh Syndrome patients and is an area that our laboratory is pursuing.

Limitations

Despite the strong evolutionary conservation in oxidative phosphorylation mechanisms, it is possible that these variants will have a different level of activity in humans compared to yeast cells.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

COX:

Cytochrome c oxidase

References

  1. Bakare AB, Lesnefsky EJ, Iyer S. Leigh Syndrome: a tale of two genomes. Front Physiol. 2021;12:693734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pitceathly RDS, Taanman JW, Rahman S, Meunier B, Sadowski M, Cirak S, et al. COX10 mutations resulting in complex multisystem mitochondrial disease that remains stable into adulthood. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(12):1556–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tavasoli A, Kachuei M, Talebi S, Eghdami S. Complex mitochondrial disease caused by the mutation of COX10 in a toddler: a case-report study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;86(6):3753–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glerum DM, Tzagoloff A. Isolation of a human cDNA for heme A:farnesyltransferase by functional complementation of a yeast cox10 mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(18):8452–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nobrega MP, Nobrega FG, Tzagoloff A. COX10 codes for a protein homologous to the ORF1 product of paracoccus denitrificans and is required for the synthesis of yeast cytochrome oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(24):14220–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coenen MJH, van den Heuvel LP, Ugalde C, Brinke M ten, Nijtmans LGJ, Trijbels FJM et al. Cytochrome c oxidase biogenesis in a patient with a mutation in COX10 gene. Annals of Neurology. 2004;56(4):560–4.

  7. Antonicka H. Mutations in COX10 result in a defect in mitochondrial heme a biosynthesis and account for multiple, early-onset clinical phenotypes associated with isolated COX deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(20):2693–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Valnot I, von Kleist-Retzow JC, Barrientos A, Gorbatyuk M, Taanman JW, Mehaye B, et al. A mutation in the human heme A:farnesyltransferase gene (COX10) causes cytochrome c oxidase deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(8):1245–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tesarova M, Vondrackova A, Stufkova H, Veprekova L, Stranecky V, Berankova K, et al. Sideroblastic anemia associated with multisystem mitochondrial disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(4):e27591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohda M, Tokuzawa Y, Kishita Y, Nyuzuki H, Moriyama Y, Mizuno Y et al. A Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Reveals the Genetic Landscape of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Complex Deficiencies. Barsh GS, editor. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(1):e1005679.

  11. Gietz RD, Akio S. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988;74(2):527–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Longtine MS, McKenzie A, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1998;14(10):953–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amberg DC, Burke D, Strathern JN, Burke D. Methods in yeast genetics: a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual. 2005 ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2005. 230 p.

  14. Diekert K, de Kroon AI, Kispal G, Lill R. Isolation and subfractionation of mitochondria from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Cell Biol. 2001;65:37–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taanman JW, Capaldi RA. Purification of yeast cytochrome c oxidase with a subunit composition resembling the mammalian enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(31):22481–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National Institutes of Health. ClinVar [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 30]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/

  17. Omasits U, Ahrens CH, Müller S, Wollscheid B. Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(6):884–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Fatima Alauddin, Bailey Bloom, Itzel Mancilla and Javier Valle Galisteo for their assistance in producing some alleles.

Funding

We thank the Office of Academic Affairs at North Central College for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SDJ designed the study and supervised the work. TSV, EBL, AM, KM, RD, NEO and SDJ performed the experiments and analyzed the resulting data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen D. Johnston.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voges, TS., Lim, E.B., MacKenzie, A. et al. Phenotypic assessment of Cox10 variants and their implications for Leigh Syndrome. BMC Res Notes 17, 228 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06879-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06879-5

Keywords