- Short Report
- Open Access
Analysis of apyrase 5' upstream region validates improved Anopheles gambiae transformation technique
© Lombardo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 09 September 2008
Accepted: 19 February 2009
Published: 19 February 2009
Genetic transformation of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae has been successfully achieved in recent years, and represents a potentially powerful tool for researchers. Tissue-, stage- and sex-specific promoters are essential requirements to support the development of new applications for the transformation technique and potential malaria control strategies. During the Plasmodium lifecycle in the invertebrate host, four major mosquito cell types are involved in interactions with the parasite: hemocytes and fat body cells, which provide humoral and cellular components of the innate immune response, midgut and salivary glands representing the epithelial barriers traversed by the parasite during its lifecycle in the mosquito.
We have analyzed the upstream regulatory sequence of the An. gambiae salivary gland-specific apyrase (AgApy) gene in transgenic An. gambiae using a piggyBac transposable element vector marked by a 3xP3 promoter:DsRed gene fusion. Efficient germ-line transformation in An. gambiae mosquitoes was obtained and several integration events in at least three different G0 families were detected. LacZ reporter gene expression was analyzed in three transgenic lines/groups, and in only one group was tissue-specific expression restricted to salivary glands.
Our data describe an efficient genetic transformation of An. gambiae embryos. However, expression from the selected region of the AgApy promoter is weak and position effects may mask tissue- and stage- specific activity in transgenic mosquitoes.
The mosquito Anopheles gambiae is the main vector of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa. Within the insect, the parasite undergoes a complex life-cycle that includes fertilization, midgut invasion, sporozoite maturation, avoidance of the mosquito innate immune response and, as prerequisite for a successful transmission, recognition and entrance into the salivary glands . The development of tools for mosquito genetic manipulation have provided evidence that Plasmodium development can be modified in the anopheline vector and opened new perspectives for studies on vector biology and on parasite-vector-host interactions [2, 3].
Several studies in the last decade reported the successful use of tissue-specific promoters for directing the expression of exogenous genes in different mosquito target organs (primarily midgut, hemocoel and salivary glands), mainly in the yellow fever vector Aedes aegypti and in the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi [4–7]. As far as the main African malaria vector An. gambiae is concerned, after the initial successful transformation  only one additional study with transgenic An. gambiae has been reported so far . In both cases, low transformation efficiencies were observed.
One of our specific interests has been the analysis of An. gambiae salivary gland-specific promoters. We have previously analyzed the putative promoter regions of the An. gambiae salivary gland-specific D7-related 4 (D7r4) and apyrase (AgApy) genes in the fruitfly and in An. stephensi [10–12]. We reported that a short region (~800 bp) from the An. gambiae AgApy promoter was able to drive stage- and tissue-specific expression of the reporter gene in transgenic An. stephensi. Compared to the endogenous expression pattern of the AgApy gene in An. gambiae, however, the level of expression in transgenic An. stephensi was low and the transgene was expressed in the proximal-lateral rather than distal-lateral lobes [12, 13]. We concluded that additional regulatory information, possibly located upstream, was missing in the short fragment used. It was also clear that the putative An. gambiae promoter needed to be examined directly in this species before more firm conclusions could be drawn. In this context, we should mention that while this work was in progress, robust salivary gland specific expression of a reporter gene in An. stephensi was reported using a promoter fragment from the An. stephensi aapp gene .
If not otherwise indicated, experimental procedures were according to Sambrook and colleagues . The sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in the Additional file 1.
pBac(3xP3RED)AgApy was constructed by amplification of a 2454 bp fragment from the AgApy promoter followed by cloning into a shuttle bluescript-based vector upstream of the E. coli LacZ coding region and the bovine growth hormone (bgh) terminator. The resulting cassette was transferred into the pSLfa1180fa plasmid vector  and then inserted in the pBac [3xP3-DsRed] vector containing the DsRed coding sequence regulated by 3xP3 promoter and SV40 terminator . The resulting pBac(3xP3RED)AgApy construct was purified using the QIAGEN Plasmid Midi kit (QIAGEN, Germany), sequenced and used for embryo microinjection after mixing with phspBac , ethanol precipitation and resuspension at 500 μg/ml (3.5:1.5 vector:transposase).
An. gambiae germline transformation
Embryonic injections were performed essentially as described by Lobo N.F. and colleagues . The detailed protocol used to perform An. gambiae embryos injections is reported in the Additional file 2.
Eight micrograms of genomic DNA from each transgenic group were digested with Hind III, fractionated on a 0.8% agarose gel and transferred on to a nylon membrane. Hybridization and washings were performed at 65°C under high stringency conditions. The pBac probes (pBacL and pBacR, spanning the pBac arms) were obtained by PCR, whilst the AgApy 1,8 kbp promoter fragment used as probe was obtained by EcoR I digestion of the pBac(3xP3RED)AgApy transformation plasmid.
RNA Extraction and RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using the TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), treated with RNase free-DNaseI (Invitrogen) and approximately 80 ng used to synthesize cDNA for PCR amplification using the SuperScript one-step RT-PCR system (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer instructions. Reverse transcription (50°C, 30 minutes) and heat inactivation of the reverse transcriptase (94°C, 2 minutes) were followed by 25 (rpS7 mRNA) or 35 (LacZ and DsRed mRNA) PCR cycles: 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 55°C, 1 minute at 72°C. Control PCR amplifications without the reverse transcription step were also performed. All the reactions were performed at least twice using different batches of RNA preparations.
Results and discussion
Injected embryos, hatched larvae and G0 adults
Mating and screening strategy
A (4 M)
B (5 F)
C (7 M)
D (15 F)
E (8 M)
F (9 M)
G (16 F)
H (7 M)
Total (71: 35M, 36F)
Southern blot hybridization was performed on G3 progeny from each of the 15 transgenic groups. This analysis distinguished 13 different genotypes, the majority (8 out of 13) of which corresponded to multiple insertions (Fig. 1B). More specifically, five lines (D2, D5, D7, D8 and E9 = E11) showed a single integration of the transgene; four groups (D1, D3, E10 and E14) carried a double integration; three groups (D6, E12 and E13 = E15) included three copies of the transgene and one (D4) had four or more integrations. Hybridization with a labeled region of the AgApy promoter (probe P, Fig. 1A) indicated the presence of fragments of the expected size both for the endogenous and recombinant AgApy promoter (Fig. 1C) in virtually all cases. The only exception was line D2 in which the recombinant promoter was not detected, suggesting that transgene rearrangement, involving loss of this region, most likely took place. In the remaining 14 genotypes, the expected correlation between transgene copy number, as estimated from the total of transposon arms (Fig. 1B), and intensity of signal corresponding to the recombinant AgApy promoter (Fig. 1C), was observed.
Three transgenic groups carrying alternative numbers and sites of transgene insertion were selected for further analysis: the E9 line, with a single insertion, and groups D4 and D6, carrying multiple copies of the transgene. It should be noted that the selection of groups was influenced significantly by the loss, shortly after initial selection, of a number of the thirteen genotypes originally obtained.
Analysis of the three transgenic lines revealed that beta-galactosidase activity was not detectable using colorimetric assays in either salivary glands or carcasses of adult females. In addition, immuno-staining of whole female salivary glands and western blot analysis of salivary gland extracts both failed to detect beta-galactosidase protein (data not shown).
LacZ reporter gene expression analysis was therefore performed by RT-PCR. Initially, the primers LacZF1 and LacZR2, previously employed to characterize LacZ expression in transgenic An. stephensi, were used . However, amplifications indicated significantly lower expression levels in transgenic An. gambiae (see Additional file 3), explaining also the inability to detect beta-galactosidase activity or protein in these lines. For this reason, a novel, better performing primers pair (LBF and LBR) was selected and employed for the following RT-PCR amplifications.
In conclusion, we report the efficient genetic transformation of An. gambiae and the characterization of an extended regulatory region of the salivary gland-specific AgApy gene. The transformation frequency (i.e. the percentage of G0 survivors producing fluorescent offspring) was estimated between 4 and 18% taking into consideration the potential occurrence of integration events early or late during germ-line development and the possible segregation of multiple insertions on different chromosomes. Since 71 G0 adults were batch mated, a minimum of 3 founders (two from group D and one from group E) identified and 13 distinct genotypes differentiated by Southern analysis, we calculated that from 3 to 13 independent integration events might have occurred. This transformation frequency is significantly higher as compared to those previously reported in primary research articles respectively by Kim W. and colleagues (1.2%, with 2 independent insertions out of 163 G0 adults) and Grossman G.L. and colleagues (0.6%, with only one transgenic founder out of 172 G0 crossed) [8, 9]. Indeed, our report represents the first research paper validating the improvements and modifications introduced in the last few years and reviewed by Lobo N.F. and colleagues, where a transformation frequency range between 5 and 17% is observed . We should also note the high number of multiple integrations obtained in our experiment (eight out of thirteen transgenic pedigrees). Insertion of multiple copies of the transgene is not always desirable because it can complicate line analysis and interpretation of the results, particularly since advanced genetic tools such as balancer chromosomes are not available for mosquitoes. It is widely documented that arthropod transformation by piggyBac yields multiple genomic insertions of the transgene . The variability of its occurrence in different transformation experiments may depend from several factors and, among these, a primary role may be played by the ratio between transposon and helper plasmid and the timing (and temperature) of injections in relation to embryo development. However, there appears to be no simple correlation between transposon/helper ratio and occurrence of multiple insertions in the transformation experiments of anopheline mosquitoes documented to date (see Additional file 4).
Several hypotheses can be made to explain the lack of correspondence between the endogenous expression profile of the AgApy gene and the weak expression achieved in our transgenic mosquitoes (e.g. the construct misses enhancers or other regulatory regions, transcript instability or poor translational level), however it would remain speculative. Certainly, the results obtained both in An. stephensi  and in An. gambiae indicate that the control of sex- and tissue-specific expression by the AgApy promoter is more complex than originally anticipated. The selection of a longer portion of the AgApy promoter in comparison to the one analyzed in An. stephensi mosquitoes and the genetic transformation of the endogenous organism did not improve the efficacy of the putative AgApy promoter in transgenic insects. In particular, while a basal stage- and tissue-specific transcriptional activity is observed at least in one An. gambiae transgenic family, elements able to confer the typical strong and female-specific expression profile are again lacking. In conclusion, the AgApy salivary gland promoter described here, which is the only one examined in An. gambiae so far, was not capable to drive the expected strong tissue-specificity of expression, although it may be still useful when low levels of expression of the transgene are needed. Further efforts have to be addressed toward the identification and characterization of a strong salivary glands specific promoter in transgenic An. gambiae. The use of classical transposon-mediated approach in combination with insulators  or with site-specific integrases  to minimize variation produced by position effect would enhance research focused on this topic.
The authors are grateful to F.C. Kafatos for the hospitality to F. Lombardo in his lab and for sharing the mosquito transformation facilities. We also wish to thank M. Calzetta for technical help with the mosquito colonies. A. Lanfrancotti was supported by Compagnia di San Paolo-IMI (Torino Italy). F. Lombardo was in part supported by the Fondazione "Istituto Pasteur-Cenci Bolognetti". This work is part of the activities of the BioMalPar European Network of Excellence supported by a European grant (LSHP-CT-2004-503578) from the Priority 1 "Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health" in the 6th Framework Programme.
- Matuschewski K: Getting infectious: formation and maturation of Plasmodium sporozoites in the Anopheles vector. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8 (10): 1547-1556. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00778.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs-Lorena M: Interrupting malaria transmission by genetic manipulation of anopheline mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis. 2003, 40 (3–4): 73-77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- James AA: Blocking malaria parasite invasion of mosquito salivary glands. J Exp Biol. 2003, 206 (Pt 21): 3817-3821. 10.1242/jeb.00616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Catteruccia F, Nolan T, Loukeris TG, Blass C, Savakis C, Kafatos FC, Crisanti A: Stable germline transformation of the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Nature. 2000, 405 (6789): 959-962. 10.1038/35016096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coates CJ, Jasinskiene N, Miyashiro L, James AA: Mariner transposition and transformation of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (7): 3748-3751. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3748.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kokoza V, Ahmed A, Wimmer EA, Raikhel AS: Efficient transformation of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti using the piggyBac transposable element vector pBac[3xP3-EGFP afm]. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2001, 31 (12): 1137-1143. 10.1016/S0965-1748(01)00120-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lycett GJ, Kafatos FC, Loukeris TG: Conditional expression in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi with Tet-On and Tet-Off systems. Genetics. 2004, 167 (4): 1781-1790. 10.1534/genetics.104.028175.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossman GL, Rafferty CS, Clayton JR, Stevens TK, Mukabayire O, Benedict MQ: Germline transformation of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae, with the piggyBac transposable element. Insect Mol Biol. 2001, 10 (6): 597-604. 10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00299.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim W, Koo H, Richman AM, Seeley D, Vizioli J, Klocko AD, O'Brochta DA: Ectopic expression of a cecropin transgene in the human malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): effects on susceptibility to Plasmodium. J Med Entomol. 2004, 41 (3): 447-455.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcà B, Lombardo F, Lanfrancotti A, Spanos L, Veneri M, Louis C, Coluzzi M: A cluster of four D7-related genes is expressed in the salivary glands of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 2002, 11 (1): 47-55. 10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00309.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lombardo F, Di Cristina M, Spanos L, Louis C, Coluzzi M, Arcà B: Promoter sequences of the putative Anopheles gambiae apyrase confer salivary gland expression in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (31): 23861-23868. 10.1074/jbc.M909547199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lombardo F, Nolan T, Lycett G, Lanfrancotti A, Stich N, Catteruccia F, Louis C, Coluzzi M, Arcà B: An Anopheles gambiae salivary gland promoter analysis in Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles stephensi. Insect Mol Biol. 2005, 14 (2): 207-216. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00549.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcà B, Lombardo F, de Lara Capurro M, della Torre A, Dimopoulos G, James AA, Coluzzi M: Trapping cDNAs encoding secreted proteins from the salivary glands of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (4): 1516-1521. 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1516.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida S, Watanabe H: Robust salivary gland-specific transgene expression in Anopheles stephensi mosquito. Insect Mol Biol. 2006, 15 (4): 403-410. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00645.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsh EF, Maniatis Te, (eds.): Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2Google Scholar
- Horn C, Wimmer EA: A versatile vector set for animal transgenesis. Dev Genes Evol. 2000, 210 (12): 630-637. 10.1007/s004270000110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horn C, Schmid BG, Pogoda FS, Wimmer EA: Fluorescent transformation markers for insect transgenesis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2002, 32 (10): 1221-1235. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00085-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Handler AM, Harrell RA: Germline transformation of Drosophila melanogaster with the piggyBac transposon vector. Insect Mol Biol. 1999, 8 (4): 449-457. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.00139.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lobo NF, Clayton JR, Fraser MJ, Kafatos FC, Collins FH: High efficiency germ-line transformation of mosquitoes. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1 (3): 1312-1317. 10.1038/nprot.2006.221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Handler AM: Use of the piggyBac transposon for germ-line transformation of insects. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2002, 32 (10): 1211-1220. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00084-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkar A, Atapattu A, Belikoff EJ, Heinrich JC, Li X, Horn C, Wimmer EA, Scott MJ: Insulated piggyBac vectors for insect transgenesis. BMC Biotechnol. 2006, 6: 27-10.1186/1472-6750-6-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nimmo DD, Alphey L, Meredith JM, Eggleston P: High efficiency site-specific genetic engineering of the mosquito genome. Insect Mol Biol. 2006, 15 (2): 129-136. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00615.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.