Skip to main content

Constitutive expression of a grapevine polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein affects gene expression and cell wall properties in uninfected tobacco



Polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) directly limit the effective ingress of fungal pathogens by inhibiting cell wall-degrading endopolygalacturonases (ePGs). Transgenic tobacco plants over-expressing grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Vvpgip1 have previously been shown to be resistant to Botrytis infection. In this study we characterized two of these PGIP over-expressing lines with known resistance phenotypes by gene expression and hormone profiling in the absence of pathogen infection.


Global gene expression was performed by a cross-species microarray approach using a potato cDNA microarray. The degree of potential cross-hybridization between probes was modeled by a novel computational workflow designed in-house. Probe annotations were updated by predicting probe-to-transcript hybridizations and combining information derived from other plant species. Comparing uninfected Vvpgip1-overexpressing lines to wild-type (WT), 318 probes showed significant change in expression. Functional groups of genes involved in metabolism and associated to the cell wall were identified and consequent cell wall analysis revealed increased lignin-levels in the transgenic lines, but no major differences in cell wall-derived polysaccharides. GO enrichment analysis also identified genes responsive to auxin, which was supported by elevated indole-acetic acid (IAA) levels in the transgenic lines. Finally, a down-regulation of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolases (XTHs), which are important in cell wall remodeling, was linked to a decrease in total XTH activity.


This evaluation of PGIP over-expressing plants performed under pathogen-free conditions to exclude the classical PGIP-ePG inhibition interaction indicates additional roles for PGIPs beyond the inhibition of ePGs.


Polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) are extracellular leucine-rich repeat (eLRR) proteins present in plants with recognition and inhibition capabilities towards fungal endopolygalacturonases (ePGs; [1]). ePGs are capable of hydrolyzing the homogalacturonan component of plant cell wall pectin and are among the first enzymes to be secreted during fungal infection. These enzymes play a major role in the virulence of several phytopathogenic fungal and bacterial species [25]. Most notably, two ePGs of the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea are required for its full virulence on different plant hosts [4, 5].

PGIPs differentially inhibit ePGs from not only a diverse range of fungi, but also different ePG isoforms from the same fungus [1]. This is also well illustrated for grapevine VvPGIP1 and ePGs from Aspergillus niger and B. cinerea, where differential inhibition towards these ePGs was observed in in vitro assays [6]. Further in vitro evidence suggests that the interaction and resultant inhibition of ePG by PGIP leads to prolonged existence of molecules with the ability to up-regulate the plant's defense response [7]. Thus, it has been suggested that PGIPs protect plants from fungal infection not only by inhibiting fungal macerating enzymes and thereby directly limiting tissue damage, but also by switching on plant defense signaling pathways [8].

Although these in vitro experiments have contributed significantly to our understanding of the PGIP-ePGs interaction, recent findings have highlighted the need to better understand the in planta roles of PGIP. For example, it was shown that over-expression of Vvpgip1 reduces the symptoms of BcPG2 from B. cinerea in tobacco leaves, without any evidence for an in vitro interaction [9]. From this work it appeared that the in vivo environment provided a context for this specific PGIP-ePG pair that could not be created in vitro. It was proposed that VvPGIP1 might bind to pectin as was shown for bean PGIPs [10] and that VvPGIP1 did not directly inhibit BcPG2, but perhaps rather shielded the most exposed and vulnerable positions in the pectin, thereby indirectly protecting against ePG actions [9].

Numerous studies have reported that high levels of pgip gene expression reduce the susceptibility towards B. cinerea, confirming the importance of PGIP in plant defense. These include over-expression of the pear pgip gene in tomato [11] and grapevine [12], Arabidopsis pgip genes over-expressed in Arabidopsis[13], a bean pgip gene in tobacco [14] and the grapevine pgip gene in tobacco [6]. In contrast, silencing of Arabidopsis Atpgip1 led to enhanced susceptibility [15]. Recently, Veronico et al. [16] reported that the expression level and pattern of a native pea Pvpgip could be linked to the degree of resistance to cyst nematode infections. Interestingly, no ePG transcripts could be derived from the cyst nematode nor was a correlation seen between PGIP expression and a native pea ePGs, suggesting that PGIPs have a role in plant-pathogen interactions outside of the classical PGIP-ePG inhibition. More light was shed on the in planta role of PGIPs when Kanai et al. [17] presented data from Arabidopsis knock-out mutants and over-expressing lines, indicating that Atpgip1 transcripts prolonged seed germination by influencing pectin degradation in the seed coat. Furthermore, the authors presented evidence that Atpgips are under the control of ABI5, a bZIP-type transcription factor that binds to ABRE elements.

Tobacco is a commonly used species to monitor plant-pathogen interactions and is suitable for PGIP over-expression studies since it has negligible PGIP activity against Botrytis ePGs [6, 18]. We have previously demonstrated that transgenic tobacco plants over-expressing Vvpgip1 leading to an increased PGIP enzyme activity are less susceptible to B. cinerea infection in both detached leaf and whole-plant time-course fungal infection assays [6]. These lines are considered to be PGIP-specific resistant lines (i.e. the resistance phenotype could be correlated with VvPGIP1 over-expression, activity levels as well as ePG-inhibition profiles) and as such provide a valuable genetic resource to study the possible role(s) of PGIPs in plant defence.

To this end, global gene expression, hormone profiling and subsequently, cell wall analysis were conducted on two Vvpgip1 over-expressing lines with previously characterized resistance phenotypes in the absence of an infecting pathogen. The presence of PGIP, under these pathogen-free conditions, caused altered expression of genes related to a range of mechanisms, including primary metabolism, cell wall organization and metabolism, water transport, photosynthesis and defense responses. An in silico cross-species co-expression analysis revealed that many of these gene families were also co-expressed in Arabidopsis. Analysis of cell wall components of the plants over-expressing Vvpgip1 showed a composition similar to wild-type (WT) with only a slight decrease in rhamnose content. However, the change in gene expression was accompanied by higher lignin content, increased level of auxin and, following Botrytis infection, a stronger jasmonic acid response. Furthermore, transcriptional down-regulation of a group of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolases (XTHs) with key roles in cell wall restructuring and remodeling led to a reduced XTH enzyme activity in the uninfected transgenic tobacco. Taken together, these findings suggest that altered PGIP expression has an effect on the cell wall structure, also affecting fundamental mechanisms such as primary metabolism.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum SR1 (Petit Havana) Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45 described in [6] and WT plants were grown in a mixture of soil and peat moss (Jiffy Products International AS, Norway) at 24°C and 55% relative humidity with a light intensity of 120 μmol m2 s-1 over a 16 h light period. Plants were supplemented with liquid organic fertilizer every two weeks (Nitrosol®, Fleuron (Pty) Ltd, South Africa). Leaf material from leaf positions three to five, where leaf three is the youngest and first fully expanded leaf, from healthy 6 to 8-week-old transgenic and control tobacco plants was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for RNA extraction, lignin analyses and phytohormone profiling. For hormone profiling during Botrytis infection, B. cinerea pathogenic cultures were prepared as described in [6]. Plants were grown in 100% relative humidity and infections performed with four inoculation spots per leaf of 5 μL of a B. cinerea spore suspension (1 × 103 spores in a 50% grape juice medium per spot). Infections were allowed to progress for 0, 18, 24 and 30 h before tissue immediately surrounding and including the infection spots (15 mm diameter) were harvested (separate plants per infection time point were infected and harvested to eliminate wound-response effects). For cell wall component analysis and XTH activity assays, transgenic lines were first established on MS medium supplemented with kanamycin [19] and then transferred to soil and grown under natural light conditions at a controlled temperature. Leaves from leaf position 3, 4 and 5 were harvested when the plants reached the six leaf stage.

RNA extraction and microarray analyses

For microarray analysis leaves of the same age and position from individuals of two transgenic lines were compared to the same WT plant. RNA from 0.5 to 1 g finely ground plant material was extracted using a sodium perchlorate extraction buffer (5 M sodium perchlorate, 0.3 M Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 8.5% polyvinylpolypyrollidone (PVPP), 2.0% PEG 4000, 1.0% β-mercapto-ethanol, 1.0% SDS). After shaking for 30 min at room temperature samples were centrifugated and plant debris was removed by passing the supernatant through a syringe plugged with cotton wool. Several phenol/chloroform extractions were performed before precipitating the RNA with 2.5 M LiCl at -20°C overnight. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and the resuspended RNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). RNA integrity was ensured on 1.2% formaldehyde gels and purity was determined by 260/230 and 260/280 absorbance ratios (>2).

Twenty-five μg RNA was used in each cDNA synthesis reaction in a total volume of 30 μL. Before denaturation at 70°C for 10 min, 2 μL of oligo d(T) primers (500 μg/mL) were added. After denaturation, first strand buffer and DTT were added according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A 2:3 (aa-dUTP:dTTP) aminoallyl-dNTP (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) mix was added (0.5 mM each of dATP, dCTP and dGTP; 0.2 mM aa-dUTP and 0.3 mM dTTP) before incubation at 46°C for 2 min, after which 200 U of SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added. The same amount of enzyme was added following incubation for 4 h at 46°C, after which cDNA synthesis proceeded overnight.

RNA was hydrolyzed by 10 μL 1 M NaOH and 0.5 M EDTA and incubated at 65°C for 15 min. To neutralize the pH, 10 μL 1 M HCl solution was added before unincorporated aminoallyl dUTP and free amines were removed using the RNeasy Mini Kit. cDNA was quantified using a Nanodrop and dried down to volumes of less than 1 μL in a vacuum dryer. Five μL of 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 9.0, was added to the cDNA, and the mixture incubated at 37°C for 10 min. Cy3 or Cy5 (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) ester was added and the coupling allowed to proceed for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. Uncoupled dyes were removed by purification with the RNeasy Mini Kit. Probe labeling efficiency of Cy-esters was estimated by measuring the absorbance at 550 nm and 650 nm. Similar amounts of labeled samples were hybridized on TIGR 10 K potato microarrays (version 3). Pre-hybridization was done under lifterslips (Erie Scientific, Portsmouth, NH, USA) with a pre-warmed solution containing 5X saline-sodium citrate (SSC) buffer, 0.1% SDS and 1% BSA at 42°C for at least 30 min. The slides were then washed in five times of deionized water and finally briefly submerged in ethanol before short centrifugation. The combined Cy-labeled probes (28 μL) were mixed with 30 μL of a 2X hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5X SSC and 0.2% SDS), 1 μL each of COT1 DNA (1 μg/uL) and poly(A)-DNA (12 μg/μL) added, for a total volume of 60 μL, denatured at 90°C for 3 min, and subsequently applied to the slide using lifterslips. Slides were incubated for 16 h at 42°C in hybridization chambers (ArrayIt, Telechem International, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and successively washed in low stringency (2X SSC, 0.5% SDS; heated to 55°C), medium stringency 0.5X SSC) and high stringency (0.05X SSC) wash buffers for 5 min each and then briefly submerged in ethanol prior to short centrifugation. Slides were scanned with an Axon GenePix 4000A scanner using the GenePix 5.1 software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Three microarray slides in total were hybridized: two slides using Vvpgip1 line 37 and WT, with a dye swap included to account for dye bias; and one slide with Vvpgip1 line 45 and WT. The result files were analyzed using the Limma package in R 2.9.1 [20]. Spots flagged as "bad" by the GenePix software were removed from further analysis. Background correction was done by the normexp method [21] with an offset of 50 to avoid negative intensities and normalization was then done by print-tip loess. The duplicateCorrelation function was used to estimate a common value for within-array duplicated spots [21]. Finally, fold changes and standard errors were obtained by fitting a linear model to each gene and standard errors were smoothed by empirical Bayes. Genes with a p-value below 0.05 after false discovery rate (FDR) control were regarded as significant. The microarray data was deposited in GEO (GSE26324).

Real-time quantitative PCR

For RT-qPCR analyses RNA was DNase treated (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase according to the manufacturer's specifications (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using 1 μg of RNA. Both oligo d(T) and random primers were added to obtain full length cDNA. cDNA samples were diluted 1:25 in dH2O before 5 μL of sample was added to 15 μL of LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I mix, prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) with a final primer concentration of 500 nM. RT-qPCR was performed using the LightCycler Instrument (Roche Applied Science).

Transcript specific primers were designed using Primer Express (Applied BioSystems) with default settings. Primer sequences for the tobacco genes xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XTH, Genbank Acc AB017025.1) and tubulin used as reference gene (TUB, Genbank Acc AB052822) were: XTH forward 5'-AGTCCAAGTTTGTAACACC-3' and reverse 5'-TCTGTCCTTAGTGCATTCTG-3', amplification product 175 bp; TUB forward 5'-TCTGGCTGCTCTGGAAA-3' and reverse 5'-GCATACAAGACACCATCAAAT-3', amplification product 197 bp. cDNA amplification conditions were as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation, 95°C for 10 s; primer annealing at 58°C for 10 s and primer extension at 72°C for 8 s, during which data acquisition was performed. Melting curve analysis was performed by increasing the temperature by 0.1°C/s in the interval 65°C to 95°C. PCR efficiencies for each sample were calculated using LinRegPCR software [22]. The efficiencies were used to calculate relative expression in a mathematical model [23].

XTH activity determination

To determine the XTH activity in tobacco leaves, a dot-blot assay based on the method described in [24] was used. Whatman 3MM paper was coated with 1% (w/v) Tamarind seed xyloglucan (Megazyme) dissolved in aqueous 0.5% (w/v) 1,1,1-trichloro-2-methylpropan-2-ol (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Eight leaves were harvested per leaf position and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Two leaves from two individual plants were pooled to ensure adequate amounts of material. This was done for all the lines tested and for leaf position three, four and five. Four extractions were done per biological repeat and each extract's activity was measured in triplicate as described above. Boiled extracts served as negative control, while a batch of cauliflower extract served as positive control for each assay [24].

Total protein was extracted from 20 mg of freeze-dried material for 6 h in 1 mL 50 mM NaOAc, pH 5.5, with gentle agitation at 8°C. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 9600g for 20 min at 4°C. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method [25] with bovine serum albumin as standard. 10 μl of each extract containing 6 nmol of the SR-conjugate (XLLGol-SR) was spotted on the 3MM paper at 4°C and then incubated at room temperature for 12 h between cellulose acetate sheets and several tissue papers to apply an even load. It was then washed for 4 h in 100 mL of 50% ethanol, rinsed in acetone and dried.

The fluorescence was measured with the IVIS® 100 Imaging System (Caliper Life Sciences) using the DsRed filter (570 nm excitation, 615 nm emission) with a 1 s exposure. The Living Image software (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA) was used to identify regions of interest (ROI) and quantify the total efficiency per cm2 for each fluorescent spot. Background fluorescence was subtracted from all values, which were then normalized to total protein.

Cell wall analysis

Cell wall materials were extracted according to a protocol modified from [26]. Briefly, frozen tobacco leaves were immersed in liquid nitrogen and ground with a mortar and a pestle into a fine powder. Ground material was subsequently boiled with 80% ethanol for 20 min, washed in methanol:chloroform (1:1) for 24 h and finally washed with methanol. Tobacco tissues were left to incubate in methanol:chloroform (1:1) for another 24 h, due to the high level of lipids and others fatty materials (e.g. waxes) present. The remaining material (also called alcohol-insoluble residues, AIR) was dried in an oven at 70°C.

Total cell wall monosaccharide composition was determined on transgenic tobacco over-expressing Vvpgip1 line 37 and WT. AIR (2 to 4 mg) from different leaf position (3 to 5) were hydrolyzed using 2 M trifluoroacetic acid (2 M TFA, 2 h at 110°C), followed by a 18 h methanolysis at 80°C with dry 2 M methanolic HCl. The generated methyl glycosides were converted into their TMS derivatives at 80°C and separated by gas chromatography (Hewlett Packard 5890 series II). The gas chromatographer was equipped with a flame ionization detector. The oven temperature program was 2 min at 120°C, 10°C/min to 160°C, and 1.5°C/min to 220°C and then 20°C/min to 280°C. Monosaccharides were identified based on their retention time and quantified by determination of their peak areas. The GC-FID was calibrated by using a range of increasing concentration of a mixture of our nine standard sugars and the sugar composition was expressed in molar percentage of monosaccharide. Myo-inositol (90 μL of 1 mg/mL solution) was used as an internal standard. In the final analysis, glucose was removed because of likely contamination of the cell wall fractions by starch-derived glucose.

Histochemical lignin assays and lignin quantification

The lignin content of the WT and Vvpgip1 lines 37 and 45 was estimated in leaf sections with potassium permanganate staining followed by transmission electron microscopy according to [27]. Additionally, the lignin content in the stems of the same lines was estimated by staining with a solution of phloroglucinol according to [28].

Quantification of lignins in the WT and transgenic lines Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45 was done using the acetyl bromide method as described in [29], with some modifications as described below. Dried tobacco leaf material (leaves three to five of eight week old plants) was utilized to isolate AIR, consisting of cell wall material. Leaf tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted twice with 80% aqueous methanol following homogenization. Following centrifugation at 12 000xg for 10 min, the pellets were washed three times with 96% ethanol and twice with a solution of 96% ethanol:hexane (2:1). The resulting AIR pellets were dried overnight at 70°C. Five to ten mg of the AIR was used to determine the percentage of lignin contained therein. The AIR was washed with 25% acetyl bromide (in acetic acid), after which it was incubated in 1 mL of the same solution at 70°C for 30 min. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, and 0.9 mL of NaOH and 0.1 mL of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.1 M) added. The volume was subsequently adjusted to 10 mL with acetic acid. The solution was incubated overnight and the absorbance measured at 280 nm with a procedural blank. The lignin content of the samples was calculated as follows: % lignin content = (absorbance × 100)/(SAC × AIR (g l-1)); where SAC is the specific absorption coefficient of lignin, for which the value of 20 gl-1 cm-1 was used.

Analysis of phytohormones using GC/MS

Leaf tissue flash frozen in liquid nitrogen was extracted according to the method of Schmelz et al. [30], with some modifications as described below. Approximately 100 mg of tissue was ground to a fine powder prior to the addition of extraction solvent (n-propanol/water/HCl) and internal standard (o-anisic acid), of which 30 ng per sample was added. Samples were vortexed to ensure homogenization prior to partitioning with dichloromethane. For the conversion of phytohormone acids to their corresponding methyl esters, the organic phase (dichloromethane/propanol) was derivatized in 4 mL glass vials for 30 min using 4 μL of a 2 M trimethylsilyldiazomethane solution in hexane. The activity of the derivatization agent was subsequently quenched with 4 μL of a 2 M acetic acid solution, also in hexane.

Vapor phase extraction of the derivatized organic phase proceeded according to [30], with the exception that commercially available Super Q filters were used (Analytical Research Systems, Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA). Briefly, the derivatized sample was evaporated at 70°C and passed through a Super Q filter under a N2 flow of 500 mL/min. To ensure complete vaporization of less volatile compounds the vial was subsequently heated to 200°C for 2 min while passing the vapor through the filter.

The analytes were eluted from the Super Q filter with 150 μL CH2Cl2 and analyzed by a Trace Gas Chromatograph (GC) (ThermoFinningan, Milan, Italy) coupled to a Trace Mass Spectrometer (MS) (Thermo MassLab, Manchester, UK). GC/MS conditions were amended from that described in [30]. Briefly, 2 μL of the dichloromethane (BDH, Poole, England) eluent was injected in the split/splitless injector of the GC, operated in the splitless mode (purge time 3.5 min, 50 mL/min) at 280°C. Compounds were separated on a Factor Four VF5-MS capillary column (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with dimensions 30 m 1. × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0,25 μm f.t. Flow of the carrier gas (Helium) through the column was 0.7 mL/min in the constant flow mode. The oven program used was 40°C, hold 1 min, ramp 15°C/min to 250°C, hold 5 min, ramp 20°C/min, and hold 2 min. In order to avoid carryover a post-run was performed after each analysis at 280°C under a head-pressure of 300 kPa. The temperature of the MS interface was kept at 280°C and the source at 200°C. The MS-detector was operated in Electron Impact (EI) mode at 70 eV and Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode. The electron multiplier voltage was set at 500 V. Three carboxylic acid methyl ester analytes were detected and quantified using SIM with retention times and ion mass to charge ratios (m/z) as follows: methyl salicylate (8.39 min, m/z 92, 120, 152); methyl jasmonate (12.38 min, m/z 83) and methyl indole-3-acetate (13.81 min, m/z 130). The internal standard, o-anisic acid methyl ester was eluted at 9.70 min with m/z 92, 120 and 152.

For quantification the internal standard method was used. Calibration curves were constructed for each analyte over the range from 2 to 200 ng.mL-1. The regression equations and their correlation coefficients obtained for SA, MeJA and IAA are detailed respectively: y = 0.0370x+0.2511 (r2 = 0.9924), y = 0.0087x+0.0303 (r2 = 0.9954) and y = 0.0120x + 0.0238 (r2 = 0.9964). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was established to be 2 pg for all analytes. Salicylic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, methyl jasmonate, o-anisic acid, trimethylsilyldiazomethane, hexane and 1-propanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

Bioinformatics workflow for probe evaluation and annotation

The interpretation of the microarray results was challenged by the potential ambiguity in probe to transcript hybridizations and incomplete annotations of the genes of the two plant species involved.

Probe Specificity and annotation

BLAST was used to map all of the extant N. tabacum ESTs (PlantGDB-derived unique transcripts version number 173a; [31]) to the probes they would likely hybridize to on the TIGR 10 K potato microarray and the result stored as a graph denoting the relationships between potential transcripts and probes. A threshold of 80% identity over at least a 100 bp region was used to identify transcripts that would be likely to hybridize to microarray probes.

As annotated genome sequences are available for neither S. tuberosum nor N. tabacum, EST datasets were used for annotation based analysis. However, the annotation was incomplete and out of date for both the EST datasets for S. tuberosum (from which the probes were designed) and N. tabacum. Prot4EST [32], which encompasses BLASTX [33], ESTScan [34] and DECODER [35] was modified in order to run on 100 × 2.83Ghz cores high performance computing architecture (Stellenbosch University) and the EST sequences from both S. tuberosum and N. tabacum translated into their corresponding protein sequences. The PLAZA [36] protein translations and associated GO and Interpro annotation for the complete genomes of Ostreococcus lucimarinus, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Physcomitrella patens, Sorghum bicolor, Oryza sativa, Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa Carica papaya and Arabidopsis thaliana were downloaded. BLASTP and OrthoMCL [37] were used to create orthologous clusters based on sequence similarity of all proteins resident in PLAZA with the translated S. tuberosum and N. tabacum ESTs. GO and Interpro annotations found for members of the resultant orthologous clusters were projected onto the orthologous members for S. tuberosum and N. tabacum proteins. Subsequently, with the use of the probe-to-transcript graph described above, annotations from both S. tuberosum and N. tabacum were assigned to the corresponding probes.

A graph structure was created to represent all of the resulting clusters, their associated annotation, assignment to probes and corresponding expression values. The resulting graph structure stored in XGMML and Cytoscape [38] were used for visualization and querying. In order to create Additional file 1, a Perl program was written to parse the graph structure, extract all connected components (e.g. clusters described above), and parse the BLASTP results to extract the most similar protein in Arabidopsis or rice (if no Arabidopsis match was found).

GO Enrichment

Significantly differentially expressed probes were determined by Limma as described above. The projected annotation for the differentially expressed probes was then analyzed for Enrichment of Gene Ontology Terms by GOEast using default settings [39].

Pathway and cross species co-expression analysis

BLAST was subsequently used to map all of the sequences associated with Arabidopsis gene identifiers onto specific probesets on the ATH1 Affymetrix microarray (thus yielding a direct map of S. tuberosum orthologous clusters to Arabidopsis probesets). A program was written in Perl to download the expression data from over 1700 Arabidopsis Affymetrix microarrays available at CressExpress [40]. Vectors of each probeset in the Affymetrix microarrays were created, including expression information from each microarray in the collection. Each of the differentially expressed S. tuberosum orthologous clusters were then analyzed for co-expression in Arabidopsis using these vectors and a Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm testing Pearson coefficient correlations thresholds of 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2 to select the clusters representing the highest levels of co-expression.

Visualization of affected genes divided into metabolic pathways or other processes was done by MapMan using a mapping file previously developed for the potato TIGR 10 K microarray [41].

Statistical analysis

Excel (Microsoft) and GenStat (VSN International) were used to generate Student's t-tests and ANOVAs as indicated in the text.

Results and discussion

Transgenic plants from various species with increased levels of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) are known to have better protection against pathogenesis by B. cinerea and Pierce's disease [1114], whereas Arabidopsis plants with pgip silencing show increased susceptibility towards Botrytis infection [15]. Clearly, PGIP expression levels affect pathogen infection and host-pathogen interaction.

The two Vvpgip1-overexpressing tobacco lines Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45, which are the focus of this study, were selected for further profiling from a population of transgenic lines considered to have PGIP-specific resistance phenotypes, since pgip over-expression, PGIP activity and ePG inhibition correlated with resistance against B. cinerea as shown Joubert et al. [6]. In order to shed more light on the possible processes associated to PGIP expression in planta and the role of PGIP leading to increased pathogen resistance, gene expression and hormone profiling was conducted. These analyses together with biochemical analyses of the cell wall confirmed that healthy un-infected PGIP transgenic plants have altered gene expression, hormone levels and cell wall structure.

Global gene expression profiling

When the study was initiated, no microarray platform for tobacco was available. Instead, genome-wide expression in tobacco plants was monitored by the TIGR 10 K potato microarray, since these two species in the Solanaceae family have a high degree of sequence conservation and the heterologous hybridization system using microarray probes for potato ESTs has previously been used and evaluated [42]. Unfortunately, the latest annotation for the potato microarray was created in 2006, and thus did not contain the latest information on gene function. Further complicating matters is the potential ambiguity introduced by cross-hybridization that is bound to occur under heterologous hybridization.

To address these issues, the degree of cross-hybridization of tobacco transcripts to the potato probes was modeled by sequence similarity analysis of all of the tobacco ESTs as compared to the sequences reported for each probe on the microarray. This was achieved by generating a graph structure based on probe sequences and tobacco ESTs, which was used to estimate probe specificity and redundancy. Figure 1 gives an example overview of the graph structure, which were also used to update and re-annotate the microarray's probe annotations based on the tobacco transcripts likely to hybridize to a certain probe and by creating orthologous clusters based on the comparisons to nine sequenced plant genomes included in PLAZA [36]. By this approach a table of GO terms associated to each probe was generated and subsequently used for GO term enrichment analysis (Additional file 2). This file can be downloaded for future use when analyzing gene expression data generated by the TIGR 10 K potato (version 3) microarray. Heterologous hybridization on arrays has been estimated before [43, 44]. However, we are unaware of a study that also takes into account the affect of cross-hybridization on the probe annotation of the microarray and subsequent GO term enrichment analysis.

Figure 1

Example of the graph structure. The graph structure was used to assess possible cross-hybridization and probe redundancy as well as to improve annotation of probes. a. Graph structure of probes with significant change in signal in Vvpgip1 line 37. b. Detailed view of part of the graph structure showing differentially expressed probes in Vvpgip1 line 37. c. Example of an orthologous cluster. Probes are marked as green squares, blue circles represent a unique identifier for the orthologous cluster and matching transcripts are included as unfilled triangles.

By processing expression data in Limma a total of 318 probes were found to be differentially expressed with a false discovery rate (FDR) of ≤ 0.05 in both Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45 in comparison to WT (Table 1). Because the two transgenic lines most likely have different genotypic backgrounds due to the independent insertion events during transformation, we regard this approach to be technically more correct than considering the two lines as biological replicates by combining the expression data prior to Limma analysis. It is also a more conservative approach since considering the lines as biological replicates would almost double the number of probes (735) showing significant differential expression. A complete list of probes with significant difference in expression is included as Additional file 1 and a selection in Additional File 3. The majority of the probes were down-regulated, whereas only 58 were up-regulated in comparison to WT plants (Table 1). The remaining 41 probes showed opposite regulation in the two lines. The oppositely regulated probes can be a result of positional effects related to the insertion of the Vvpgip1 expression cassette in the tobacco genome and thus reflect true differences between the transgenic lines. Alternatively, it might arise from rapid fluctuation in the abundance of certain transcripts caused by PGIP over-expression.

Table 1 Differentially expressed probes in Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45 in comparison to WT (FDR, p < 0.05)

Differentially expressed probes were analyzed by examining the graph structure of orthologous clusters and by examining top hits based on sequence identity (Figure 1; Additional file 1). Because of the probe ambiguity and the likelihood that many probes bind different transcripts, the exact number of differentially expressed genes monitored could not be determined. In fact, since the tobacco genome still remains un-sequenced, probe redundancy and specificity can only be estimated at this point. However, based on the graph structure we approximate that the 318 differentially expressed probes correspond to ca 250 genes.

A manual categorization of clusters and probes were done with the help of the MIPS 2.0 database [45], and probes were consequently divided into functional groups according to Additional file 1. Probes for which no sequence information was available are also listed if a significant change in signal intensity was observed. More than 15% of all clusters identified could not be functionally classified since the level of identity to other sequences was too low or no informative annotation could be inferred from related genes.

Even if the changes in expression were generally subtle there was an over-representation of certain functional groups among the differentially expressed genes when dividing genes by GO terms or MapMan categories. GO term enrichments were based on probes with a significant change in signal in both transgenic lines in comparison to the wild-type (WT). The full graphical representation of enriched terms can be found in Additional file 4.

Four broad groups of affected probes fall under the categories of cell wall biogenesis and organization, carbon metabolism, photosynthesis and stress defense signaling, whereas more specific groups of interest would be glucan and polysaccharide metabolic processes, water transport as well as response to auxin and brassinosteroid stimuli and to cyclopentones. Biosynthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) requires several cyclopentenone precursors and these have been suggested to be able to fulfill some of the JA roles in vivo[46]. Among the molecular function categories are glycolysis, energy transfer, cell wall components and water channel activity. Enrichment of cellular components linked to the chloroplast and mitochondrial compartments further strengthen the picture of differences in metabolism between the PGIP over-expressing lines and WT.

Functional groups of differentially expressed genes between the two transgenic lines and WT plants were visualized in MapMan using a mapping file previously developed specifically for the potato TIGR 10 K microarray [41]. As could be expected from the GO enrichment analysis results, the largest changes were seen in different metabolic pathways. A concordance between the lines was seen for groups of genes linked to cell wall modification and degradation, glycolysis, starch synthesis and photosystem-light reactions (Additional file 5).

In order to examine whether the changes in gene expression coupled to an augmented level of Vvpgip1 expression seen in this study were similar to the expression pattern observed in other plant systems, the co-expression of Arabidopsis genes associated to the orthologous clusters based on sequence similarity were investigated. Strikingly, several gene families affected in the transgenic lines were also found to be co-expressed in Arabidopsis, e.g. members of the XTHs, peroxidases UDP epimerases and JAZs (Additional file 1; Additional file 3). The similarities in transcriptional patterns related to pgip expression suggest that there is a degree of conservation of these effects between the two species. Furthermore, these similarities between our transgenic system and Arabidopsis PGIP expression strengthen the notion that the changes seen in expression pattern is due to Vvpgip1 over-expression per se and not due to other general properties of PGIPs, such as possible indirect effects resulting from the fact that VvPGIP1 is a secreted, apoplastic protein as discussed as further discussed in Summary and Conclusions.

Hormone profiling

As part of the general comparison between the transgenic lines with resistance phenotypes to the susceptible controls, a hormone profile of salicylic acid (SA), indole-acetic acid (IAA) and jasmonic acid (JA) was established (Figure 2). Under the non-infecting conditions used in this study, IAA levels were statistically significantly increased in the transgenic lines, SA levels were slightly lower in the transgenic lines compared to the WT, whereas JA levels were below the detection level in both transgenic lines and WT. Hormone profiling was also performed during a Botrytis infection time series (Figure 3). After infection, JA was detectable and both transgenic lines displayed higher JA levels than WT at 18 and 24 h after infection (p = 0.045 at 24 h) at the local lesions. For SA and IAA no definite differences were seen between the groups of transgenic lines and WT following Botrytis infection.

Figure 2

Phytohormone content. Salicylic acid (SA) and indole-acetic acid (IAA) content (ng g-1 fresh weight) measured as their corresponding methyl esters in WT and transgenic lines. The total pool of SA (dark-blue bars) present in plants as free and methylated forms were analyzed. Both SA and IAA levels (light-blue bars) were significantly different from WT in both transgenic lines as indicated by p-values (two-tailed Student's t-test). Statistical groups as determined by one-way ANOVA (multi-comparison Bonferroni test, p < 0.05) are given as letters. No jasmonic acid (total) was detected in the samples. N represents the number of biological repeats and error bars are given as two times the standard deviation.

Figure 3

Phytohormone profiling following Botrytis infection. The hormones (a) salicylic acid (SA) (b) indole-acetic acid (IAA) and (c) jasmonic acid (JA) were measured as their corresponding methyl esters. Two to three plants per time point were used. Error bars are given as two times the standard deviation.

Comparing the hormone data with the gene expression analysis, no genes involved in SA biosynthesis were differentially expressed and there was no enrichment of GO terms related to SA regulation. Thus, in spite of SA's involvement in pathogen defense signaling, no strong link between Vvpgip1 over-expression and SA and SA-related mechanisms could be established in uninfected or infected tissue. This is in line with an earlier report on PGIP-regulation in Arabidopsis[13].

In contrast to SA, indole-acetic acid (IAA) levels without Botrytis infection were statistically separable into two groups with the transgenic lines containing higher levels of IAA grouped together (Figure 2). Interestingly, corresponding to the increase in IAA levels there is an over-representation of genes responding to auxin stimulus in the transgenic lines from the microarray data. The down-regulation of the Aux/IAA transcriptional repressors of auxin induced genes, which belong to a large family of transcription factors, could possibly be linked to the over-representation of genes responding to auxin stimulus detected in the pgip over-expressing lines. Auxin promotes the degradation of Aux/IAA transcriptional repressors making it possible for auxin response factors (ARFs) to activate the transcription of auxin-responsive genes. Furthermore, increased auxin levels enhance the binding of Aux/IAA proteins to the F-box protein TIR1 leading to ubiquitination and degradation of the Aux/IAA proteins (reviewed in [44]). The expression level of several components of protein degradation and proteolysis were affected, e.g. cullin, a family involved in SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, ubiquitin proteins, ubiquitin-protein ligase and F-box proteins as well as a number of proteases. The high number of differentially expressed genes involved in protein degradation might be a consequence of changes in hormone signaling, as ubiquitination and targeting for proteosome degradation are common strategies in plant hormone signaling.

Under uninfected conditions JA levels were below the detection level. However, both transgenic lines had a stronger JA response following Botrytis infection than WT at the local lesions (Figure 3). On the transcriptional level under un-infecting conditions, Vvpgip1 over-expression affected JAZ genes and cyclopentone responsive elements linked to JA regulation and biosynthesis. Like SA, JA was recently suggested to play an important role in signaling leading to Systemic Acquired Response (SAR; [45]). In Vvpgip line 37, expression of a LOX gene and a 12-oxophytodienoate-reductase were changed. These enzymes are involved in jasmonate biosynthesis and indicative of an association between PGIPs and JA-mediated signaling. The down-regulation of JAZ genes, which are repressors of JA signaling, indicates that JA signaling pathways might be 'primed' and could explain the quicker response in JA levels observed in the transgenic lines when challenged with a pathogen (Figure 3).

Related to ethylene signaling, s-adenosylmethionine synthetase (SAM), a member of a gene family involved in ethylene biosynthesis, was down-regulated together with an ethylene response factor (AtERF3) belonging to the B1 subfamily of the ERF/AP2 transcription factor family. The latter functions in adaptation to stress and has been shown to be induced by ethylene, JA and pathogens. AtERF1 is also a positive regulator of ET and JA signaling and a possible integration point in the cross-talk between ET and JA signaling pathways (reviewed in [47, 48]).

PGIP expression influences the cell wall by lower XTH activity and increased lignin content

A large number of affected probes matched cell wall-associated genes indicating that cell wall modifications are taking place as an effect of PGIP over-expression. Many differentially expressed probes were linked to lignin and pectin metabolism.

Several tobacco xyloglucan endotransglycosylases (XTHs) representing members of XTH Group I and II were markedly down-regulated. Xyloglucan is the most abundant hemicellulose in dicotyledonous plants and plays a central role in the structure of plant cell walls by cross-linking cellulose microfibrils [49, 50] and XTH enzymes are believed to be important for regulation of cell wall strength, extensibility and tissue integrity [51]. XTH Group I and II have in vitro been shown to mediate transglucosylation between xyloglucans, in contrast to group III that catalyzes xyloglucan endohydrolysis [52]. It should, however, be noted that the isoforms are grouped according to phylogenetic relationship and that the enzyme activity of all members have not yet been determined.

Because of the important role in cell wall remodeling and marked down-regulation, XTH expression and enzyme activity were investigated further. Indeed, a decrease in XTH expression around the same levels observed in the microarray analysis could be confirmed by RT-qPCR for a tobacco XTH gene belonging to the class I subfamily (Figure 4a). The down-regulation was also confirmed in two additional VvPGIP1 over-expressing lines tested (data not shown). Moreover, a dot-blot enzyme activity assay showed that the general transcriptional down-regulation of XTHs led to a decrease in total XTH activity in leaves of both lines (Figure 4b). Thus, the transcriptional regulation of XTHs had a clear effect on XTH activity, which strengthens the idea that PGIPs have a direct or indirect effect on cell wall modification possibly leading to changes in xyloglucan metabolism.

Figure 4

Expression and activity of XTH. a. Expression of Nicotiana tabacum xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XTH, Genbank Acc AB017025.1) in Vvpgip1 lines 37 and 45 relative to the untransformed control (WT). Standard deviation of the mean relative expression of four technical repeats per plant line is shown with error bars. b. Total XTH activity in tobacco leaves determined by a dot-blot enzyme activity assay. Leaves representing leaf position 3 was used for the assay. A two-tailed Student's t-test showed that p < 0.05 for both transgenic lines in comparison to WT. N denotes the number of biological repeats.

In tobacco leaves, down-regulation of an XTH (Nt XET-1) with consequent reduced XTH activity, was previously reported to result in a shift towards xyloglucan with a higher molecular weight, resembling that of older leaves [53]. The authors noted that the cell walls may be strengthened by the reduced turnover and hydrolysis of xyloglucan and it was suggested that the resultant wall strengthening may hold implications for plant-pathogen interactions. XTH activity also increases during fruit ripening and the expression of V. vinifera VvXTH1 reaches a maximum at the fully ripe stage when berry softening occurs [54]. Interestingly, VvXTH1 expression in grape berries is inversely correlated to VvPGIP1 expression, which instead steadily declines until grape berries reach the fully ripe stage [55]. This inversely correlated expression resembles the correlation between Vvpgip1 and XTHs in the transgenic tobacco. Related to xyloglucan modification, a beta-D-xylosidase with the closest sequence identity to Arabidopsis AtXyl4, which is involved in the hydrolysis of the xylan backbone [56], was down-regulated.

Many affected cell wall-associated genes were involved in either lignin or pectin metabolism. The role of lignification in pathogen defense is well documented [57] and cell walls with increased lignin content provide the plant with an effective physical barrier against phytopathogens [58]. Cinnamoyl-CoA reductases (CCR), caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferases and beta-glucosidases were differentially expressed and are all involved in monolignol biosynthesis or modification. Monolignol bricks are exported to the cell wall, and then assembled to lignins in muro by laccases and peroxidases [59] and changed expression was seen for members of the class III peroxidase family. Recently, it was shown by RNAi silencing that several enzymes in monolignol biosynthesis are crucial for defense against powdery mildew penetration in wheat [60]. In tobacco mutants, down-regulation of a CCR has been shown to lead to changes in the lignin profiles and the syringyl-guaiacyl (S/G) ratio, but not necessarily to altered lignin content [61].

Because of the changes seen in gene expression and the known importance of lignin in plant defense, the lignin content was determined. An increased deposition of lignin in leaf and stem tissue of the transgenic lines was observed and by absolute quantification an increased lignin content could be confirmed for Vvpgip1 line 37 and a similar trend was seen in line 45 (Figures 5a, b and 6). The increase of lignin in the cell walls of the PGIP-specific resistant lines should impact positively on pathogen resistance.

Figure 5

Lignin content determined by staining. Leaf and stem sections of WT and transgenic lines (Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45) expressing the Vvpgip1 transgene. a. Sections corresponding smaller parts of the leaf were stained with potassium permanganate and studied by transmission electron microscopy according to [27]. Lignin in the cell walls stain darker in the transgenic lines. b. Stem sections were hand cut with a razor and stained with a solution of phloroglucinol according to Ruzin [28]. The intensity of the pink-red stain indicates increased lignin deposition in the secondary xylem. Stem sections were taken from the same internode of plants of the same growth stage; leaves for embedding and sectioning were from the same position on plants of the same age (6-8 leaf stage).

Figure 6

Cell wall lignin content in leaves. The lignin content of untransformed control (WT) and transgenic Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45 is expressed as the percentage contained in the alcohol-insoluble residue (AIR). Lignin content was determined with the acetyl bromide lignin method, as described in [29]. Statistical analyses (two-tailed Student's t-test) could separate the WT from the Vvpgip1 line 37 (p = 0.035) but not Vvpgip1 line 45, for which a similar trend was seen (p = 0.20). Standard deviation is given as error bars. N represents the number of biological repeats.

Even if most evidence for the influence of plant hormones on the plant cell wall is indirect, there is a strong belief that phytohormones influence cell wall biosynthesis and remodeling [62]. Auxin, for example, has an effect on cell wall structure and expansion, acting in combination with brassinosteroids, which was the only other hormone-related GO category enriched in the transgenic lines. Previous work indicates that increased IAA content can be coupled to regulation of XTH and the increased deposition of lignin, as was observed in the transgenic lines [6365]. Catalá et al. [65] reported a down-regulation of a tomato XTH gene (LeXET2) by auxin and transgenic tobacco lines overproducing IAA exhibited increased lignin content and altered lignin composition [63]. Sitbon et al. [64] suggested that the increased lignin deposition may have resulted from increased peroxidase activity, brought about by increased IAA levels and in the transgenic lines, expression levels of several class III peroxidases changed. However, with the exception of a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase and in line 45 one peroxidase similar to the Arabidopsis peroxidase 53 precursor, the peroxidases are all down-regulated. Whether these changes are a direct result of constitutive over-expression of pgip influencing IAA, remains to be seen. Alternatively, the changes seen in cell wall remodeling and metabolism reported here, possibly caused by the interaction of PGIPs in the cell wall, leads to increased IAA-levels.

Among the differentially expressed genes related to pectin biosynthesis and composition was a galacturonosyltransferase-like protein (GATL), which is closely related to other galacturonosyltransferase involved in pectin and/or xylan synthesis. Five Arabidopsis GATL mutants were recently characterized and shown to have altered pectin and hemicellulose properties [66]. A putative pectinesterase was also down-regulated. These enzymes modify the degree of methylesterification of pectic homogalacturonan affecting cell wall strengthening (reviewed in [67]). PGIP has been shown to directly interact with pectin in vitro by binding a negatively charged homogalacturonan motif [10]. Examining Arabidopsis PGIP knock-out and over-expressing lines, a recent report further strengthened the link between PGIP and pectin stability by showing that constitutive PGIP over-expression increased the amount of pectin deposited in the seed coat [17].

Several other down-regulated cell wall-associated genes were involved in sugar metabolism. UDP-glucose epimerases (4-UGE) are known to be involved in the channeling of activated galactose to arabinogalactan proteins [68] and to xyloglucan and pectins [26, 69]. Other genes related to cell wall biosynthesis and in muro remodeling observed to have altered expression patterns were a beta-galactosidase and a cellulose synthase-like gene.

The overall change in the expression of genes related to cell wall composition and structure observed led to the analysis of the leaf cell wall content of eight monosaccharides in Vvpgip1 line 37. However, with the exception of rhamnose, which is associated to rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I) pectin polysaccharides, the cell wall composition was similar to WT (Figure 7). The differential expression of several genes involved in cell wall remodeling and the confirmation that the composition did not change significantly suggest that cell wall organization, rather than composition is affected by the presence of the PGIP. Future studies will focus on the architecture and cross-linking of cell wall components, specifically with regards to pectin content and composition.

Figure 7

Cell wall component analysis. Total cell wall monosaccharide was determined in tobacco leaves (leaf position 3) for two WT and three Vvpgip1 line 37 biological repeats. Letters represent statistical groups (within each metabolite) as determined by one-way ANOVA (multi-comparison Bonferroni test, p < 0.05).

PGIP expression induces a shift in primary metabolism

Apart from genes related to the cell wall and hormone biosynthesis and signaling, several genes involved in primary metabolism showed a change in expression (Additional file 1). Among these were enzymes involved in glycolysis, the OPP pathway and the TCA cycle. Several genes involved in nitrogen metabolism and catabolism were also affected. Interestingly, some metabolic genes that could be linked to sink-source tissue regulation were identified, e.g. cell wall invertases and an L-asparaginase 4 precursor [70, 71]. Cell wall invertases are believed to be key enzymes in the transaction between sink and source tissues and a down-regulation of activity leading to a decrease in hexose sugar availability is an indication of a transformation from sink to source (reviewed in [71]).

Defense mechanisms are energy intensive and during pathogen attack it is necessary for the plant to regulate metabolic pathways in order to deprive the pathogen of energy resources at the same time as it recruits energy for its own defense response (reviewed in [72]). Our results indicate that the Vvpgip1 over-expressing lines have adjustments of the primary metabolism even before pathogen attack which might be indicative of a 'primed-like' state. Alternatively, the changes seen in primary metabolism might also be linked to the changes observed in cell wall remodeling and metabolism, which probably affects energy demand and biosynthesis of various building blocks needed. These aspects need further investigation, specifically also in the presence of an infecting pathogen.

Summary and conclusions

Taken together, there is clear evidence that transgenic lines over-expressing Vvpgip1 have altered cell wall properties compared to their untransformed counterparts, even in the absence of pathogen infection. In addition, increased levels of auxin in uninfected tissue and an amplified JA response following Botrytis infection were seen. Interestingly, there were subtle changes in the transcription of a large number of genes representing different distinct functional sets, notably related to cell wall functions, primary metabolism and stress responses. Among the more markedly down-regulated genes were XTH s, and we could show that the decrease in XTH expression led to a lowered XTH activity. The alteration of XTHs, together with an increased deposition of lignin also observed, are possible contributors to the reduced Botrytis susceptibility observed in these PGIP-specific resistant lines.

The current hypothesis is that PGIP's involvement in plant defense is limited to the inhibition of ePGs limiting tissue maceration and necrosis. Also, following inhibition of ePG by PGIP, it is believed that the lifetime of molecules with elicitor activity towards the activation of plant defenses are extended [7]. But, since the conditions primarily studied here were with the pathogen absent, neither the inhibition of ePG nor the extension of the lifetime of oligogalacturonides were involved. PGIP may directly influence defense responses in the plant possibly by strengthening the cell walls; whether by virtue of its structural features, which contains a LRR structure shared with many receptor involved in pathogen recognition or its integration in the cell wall.

However, at this stage we cannot exclude that the effects of the Vvpgip1 over-expression observed are due to properties specific to VvPGIP1. Putatively, these could originate from more general properties of the protein, e.g., as an effect of its cellular transportation and presence in the apoplast. Still, the cross-species co-expression analysis shows that important genes like members of XTHs, peroxidases, UDP epimerases and JAZs are selectively co-expressed also with PGIPs in Arabidopsis, and thus gives some evidence that these groups of genes are specifically affected by the PGIP expression levels.

Lately, other evidence indicating a broader role of PGIPs has been presented. For example, studies have shown that PGIP-encoding gene regulates floral organ number in rice, that the expression of a pea PGIP affects the resistance to nematode invasion without the detection of ePGs in either organism and that PGIP expression influences seed imbibition [16, 17, 72]. In addition to the inhibition of ePGs and subsequent signaling events, these observations of PGIP's effects on plant development and pathogen resistance together with the work presented in this manuscript, are shedding new light on the in planta roles of PGIP.


  1. 1.

    De Lorenzo G, D'Ovidio R, Cervone F: The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) in defense against pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001, 39: 313-335. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.313.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rodriguez-Palenzuela P, Burr TJ, Collmer A: Polygalacturonase is a virulence factor in Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173 (20): 6547-6552.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shieh MT, Brown RL, Whitehead MP, Cary JW, Cotty PJ, Cleveland TE, Dean RA: Molecular genetic evidence for the involvement of a specific polygalacturonase, P2c, in the invasion and spread of Aspergillus flavus in cotton bolls. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63 (9): 3548-3552.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    ten Have A, Mulder W, Visser J, van Kan JA: The endopolygalacturonase gene Bcpg1 is required for full virulence of Botrytis cinerea. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998, 11 (10): 1009-1016. 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.10.1009.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kars I, Krooshof GH, Wagemakers L, Joosten R, Benen JA, van Kan JA: Necrotizing activity of five Botrytis cinerea endopolygalacturonases produced in Pichia pastoris. Plant J. 2005, 43 (2): 213-225. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02436.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Joubert DA, Slaughter AR, Kemp G, Becker JV, Krooshof GH, Bergmann C, Benen J, Pretorius IS, Vivier MA: The grapevine polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (VvPGIP1) reduces Botrytis cinerea susceptibility in transgenic tobacco and differentially inhibits fungal polygalacturonases. Transgenic Res. 2006, 15 (6): 687-702. 10.1007/s11248-006-9019-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cervone F, Hahn MG, De Lorenzo G, Darvill A, Albersheim P: Host-Pathogen Interactions: XXXIII. A Plant Protein Converts a Fungal Pathogenesis Factor into an Elicitor of Plant Defense Responses. Plant Physiol. 1989, 90 (2): 542-548. 10.1104/pp.90.2.542.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Federici L, Di Matteo A, Fernandez-Recio J, Tsernoglou D, Cervone F: Polygalacturonase inhibiting proteins: players in plant innate immunity?. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11 (2): 65-70. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.12.005.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Joubert DA, Kars I, Wagemakers L, Bergmann C, Kemp G, Vivier MA, van Kan JA: A polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein from grapevine reduces the symptoms of the endopolygalacturonase BcPG2 from Botrytis cinerea in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves without any evidence for in vitro interaction. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20 (4): 392-402. 10.1094/MPMI-20-4-0392.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Spadoni S, Zabotina O, Di Matteo A, Mikkelsen JD, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G, Mattei B, Bellincampi D: Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein interacts with pectin through a binding site formed by four clustered residues of arginine and lysine. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141 (2): 557-564. 10.1104/pp.106.076950.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Powell AL, van Kan J, ten Have A, Visser J, Greve LC, Bennett AB, Labavitch JM: Transgenic expression of pear PGIP in tomato limits fungal colonization. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000, 13 (9): 942-950. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.9.942.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Aguero CB, Uratsu SL, Greve C, Powell AL, Labavitch JM, Meredith CP, Dandekar AM: Evaluation of tolerance to Pierce's disease and Botrytis in transgenic plants of Vitis vinifera L. expressing the pear PGIP gene. Mol Plant Pathol. 2005, 6 (1): 43-51. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00262.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ferrari S, Vairo D, Ausubel FM, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G: Tandemly duplicated Arabidopsis genes that encode polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins are regulated coordinately by different signal transduction pathways in response to fungal infection. Plant Cell. 2003, 15 (1): 93-106. 10.1105/tpc.005165.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Manfredini C, Sicilia F, Ferrari S, Pontiggia D, Salvi G, Caprari C, Lorito M, De Lorenzo G: Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 2 of Phaseolus vulgaris inhibits BcPG1, a polygalacturonase of Botrytis cinerea important for pathogenicity, and protects transgenic plants from infection. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2005, 67: 108-115. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.10.002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ferrari S, Galletti R, Vairo D, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G: Antisense expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana AtPGIP1 gene reduces polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein accumulation and enhances susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19 (8): 931-936. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0931.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Veronico P, Melillo MT, Saponaro C, Leonetti P, Picardi E, Jones JT: A polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein with a role in pea defence against the cyst nematode Heterodera goettingiana. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011, 12 (3): 275-287. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00671.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kanai M, Nishimura M, Hayashi M: A peroxisomal ABC transporter promotes seed germination by inducing pectin degradation under the control of ABI5. Plant J. 2010, 62 (6): 936-947.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Xu ZS, Xiong TF, Ni ZY, Chen XP, Chen M, Li LC, Gao DY, Yu XD, Liu P, Ma YZ: Isolation and identification of two genes encoding leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins differentially responsive to pathogen attack and salt stress in tobacco. Plant Sci. 2009, 176: 38-45. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Murashige T, Skoog F: A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962, 15 (3): 473-497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Smyth GK: Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor, R. Gentleman, V. Carey, S. Dudoit, R. Irizarry, W. Huber (eds.). Edited by: . 2005, Springer, New York, 397-420.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ritchie ME, Silver J, Oshlack A, Holmes M, Diyagama D, Holloway A, Smyth GK: A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2007, 23 (20): 2700-2707. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm412.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF: Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett. 2003, 339 (1): 62-66. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01423-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (9): e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fry SC: Novel 'dot-blot' assays for glycosyltransferases and glycosyl hydrolases: optimisation for xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) activity. Plant J. 1997, 11: 1141-1150. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11051141.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nguema-Ona E, Andeme-Onzighi C, Aboughe-Angone S, Bardor M, Ishii T, Lerouge P, Driouich A: The reb1-1 mutation of Arabidopsis. Effect on the structure and localization of galactose-containing cell wall polysaccharides. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140 (4): 1406-1417. 10.1104/pp.105.074997.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fromm J, Rockel B, Lautner S, Windeisen E, Wanner G: Lignin distribution in wood cell walls determined by TEM and backscattered SEM techniques. J Struct Biol. 2003, 143 (1): 77-84. 10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00119-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ruzin SE: Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. 1999, New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    de Ascensao AR, Dubery IA: Soluble and wall-bound phenolics and phenolic polymers in Musa acuminata roots exposed to elicitors from Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense. Phytochemistry. 2003, 63 (6): 679-686. 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00286-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Schmelz EA, Engelberth J, Tumlinson JH, Block A, Alborn HT: The use of vapor phase extraction in metabolic profiling of phytohormones and other metabolites. Plant J. 2004, 39 (5): 790-808. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02168.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Duvick J, Fu A, Muppirala U, Sabharwal M, Wilkerson MD, Lawrence CJ, Lushbough C, Brendel V: PlantGDB: a resource for comparative plant genomics. Nucleic Acid Res. 2008, 36 (Database issue): D959-965.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wasmuth JD, Blaxter ML: prot4EST: translating expressed sequence tags from neglected genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 187-10.1186/1471-2105-5-187.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997, 25 (17): 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lottaz C, Iseli C, Jongeneel CV, Bucher P: Modeling sequencing errors by combining Hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2003, 19 (Suppl 2): ii103-112. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fukunishi Y, Hayashizaki Y: Amino acid translation program for full-length cDNA sequences with frameshift errors. Physiol Genomics. 2001, 5 (2): 81-87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Proost S, Van Bel M, Sterck L, Billiau K, Van Parys T, Van de Peer Y, Vandepoele K: PLAZA: a comparative genomics resource to study gene and genome evolution in plants. Plant Cell. 2009, 21 (12): 3718-3731. 10.1105/tpc.109.071506.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS: OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003, 13 (9): 2178-2189. 10.1101/gr.1224503.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cline MS, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, Landys N, Workman C, Christmas R, Avila-Campilo I, Creech M, Gross B, et al: Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2 (10): 2366-2382. 10.1038/nprot.2007.324.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zheng Q, Wang XJ: GOEAST: a web-based software toolkit for Gene Ontology enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acid Res. 2008, 36 (Web Server issue): W358-363.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Srinivasasainagendra V, Page GP, Mehta T, Coulibaly I, Loraine AE: CressExpress: a tool for large-scale mining of expression data from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147 (3): 1004-1016. 10.1104/pp.107.115535.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rotter A, Usadel B, Baebler S, Stitt M, Gruden K: Adaptation of the MapMan ontology to biotic stress responses: application in solanaceous species. Plant Methods. 2007, 3: 10-10.1186/1746-4811-3-10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rensink WA, Lee Y, Liu J, Iobst S, Ouyang S, Buell CR: Comparative analyses of six solanaceous transcriptomes reveal a high degree of sequence conservation and species-specific transcripts. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 124-10.1186/1471-2164-6-124.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Renn SC, Aubin-Horth N, Hofmann HA: Biologically meaningful expression profiling across species using heterologous hybridization to a cDNA microarray. BMC Genomics. 2004, 5 (1): 42-10.1186/1471-2164-5-42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rise ML, von Schalburg KR, Brown GD, Mawer MA, Devlin RH, Kuipers N, Busby M, Beetz-Sargent M, Alberto R, Gibbs AR, et al: Development and application of a salmonid EST database and cDNA microarray: data mining and interspecific hybridization characteristics. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (3): 478-490. 10.1101/gr.1687304.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schoof H, Ernst R, Nazarov V, Pfeifer L, Mewes HW, Mayer KF: MIPS Arabidopsis thaliana Database (MAtDB): an integrated biological knowledge resource for plant genomics. Nucleic Acid Res. 2004, 32 (Database issue): D373-376.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Stintzi A, Weber H, Reymond P, Browse J, Farmer EE: Plant defense in the absence of jasmonic acid: the role of cyclopentenones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (22): 12837-12842. 10.1073/pnas.211311098.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gutterson N, Reuber TL: Regulation of disease resistance pathways by AP2/ERF transcription factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004, 7 (4): 465-471. 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.04.007.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bari R, Jones JD: Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2009, 69 (4): 473-488. 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    McNeil M, Darvill AG, Fry SC, Albersheim P: Structure and function of the primary cell walls of plants. Ann Rev Biochem. 1984, 53: 625-663. 10.1146/

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM: Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 1993, 3 (1): 1-30. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Saladie M, Rose JK, Cosgrove DJ, Catala C: Characterization of a new xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) from ripening tomato fruit and implications for the diverse modes of enzymic action. Plant J. 2006, 47 (2): 282-295. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02784.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rose JK, Braam J, Fry SC, Nishitani K: The XTH family of enzymes involved in xyloglucan endotransglucosylation and endohydrolysis: current perspectives and a new unifying nomenclature. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43 (12): 1421-1435. 10.1093/pcp/pcf171.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Herbers K, Lorences EP, Barrachina C, Sonnewald U: Functional characterisation of Nicotiana tabacum xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (NtXET-1): generation of transgenic tobacco plants and changes in cell wall xyloglucan. Planta. 2001, 212 (2): 279-287. 10.1007/s004250000393.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Nunan KJ, Davies C, Robinson SP, Fincher GB: Expression patterns of cell wall-modifying enzymes during grape berry development. Planta. 2001, 214 (2): 257-264. 10.1007/s004250100609.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    De Ascensao ARFDC: Isolation and characterization of a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) and its encoding gene from Vitis vinifera L . PhD thesis, Stellenbosch University. 2001

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Minic Z, Rihouey C, Do CT, Lerouge P, Jouanin L: Purification and characterization of enzymes exhibiting beta-D-xylosidase activities in stem tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135 (2): 867-878. 10.1104/pp.104.041269.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nicholson RL, Hammerschmidt R: Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1992, 30: 369-389. 10.1146/

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ride JP: Cell walls and other structural barriers in defense. In: Biochemical Plant Pathology, J.A. Callow (Ed). 1983, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 215-236.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kaneda M, Rensing KH, Wong JC, Banno B, Mansfield SD, Samuels AL: Tracking monolignols during wood development in lodgepole pine. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147 (4): 1750-1760. 10.1104/pp.108.121533.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bhuiyan NH, Selvaraj G, Wei Y, King J: Gene expression profiling and silencing reveal that monolignol biosynthesis plays a critical role in penetration defence in wheat against powdery mildew invasion. J Exp Bot. 2009, 60 (2): 509-521. 10.1093/jxb/ern290.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Piquemal J, Lapierre C, Myton K, O'Connell A, Schuch W, Grima-Pettenati J, Boudet AM: Down-regulation of Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase induces significant changes of lignin profiles in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant J. 1998, 13: 71-83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Sanchez-Rodriguez C, Rubio-Somoza I, Sibout R, Persson S: Phytohormones and the cell wall in Arabidopsis during seedling growth. Trends in Plant Science. 2010, 15 (5): 291-301. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.03.002.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sitbon F, Hennion S, Sundberg B, Little CH, Olsson O, Sandberg G: Transgenic Tobacco Plants Coexpressing the Agrobacterium tumefaciens iaaM and iaaH Genes Display Altered Growth and Indoleacetic Acid Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 1992, 99 (3): 1062-1069. 10.1104/pp.99.3.1062.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sitbon F, Hennion S, Anthony Little CH, Sundberg B: Enhanced ethylene production and peroxidase activity in IAA-overproducing tobacco plants with increased lignin content and altered lignin deposition. Plant Sci. 1999, 141: 165-173. 10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00236-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Catala C, Rose JK, York WS, Albersheim P, Darvill AG, Bennett AB: Characterization of a tomato xyloglucan endotransglycosylase gene that is down-regulated by auxin in etiolated hypocotyls. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127 (3): 1180-1192. 10.1104/pp.010481.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kong Y, Zhou G, Yin Y, Xu Y, Pattathil S, Hahn MG: Molecular analysis of a family of Arabidopsis genes related to galacturonosyltransferases. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155 (4): 1791-1805. 10.1104/pp.110.163220.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Pelloux J, Rusterucci C, Mellerowicz EJ: New insights into pectin methylesterase structure and function. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12 (6): 267-277. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.001.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Andeme-Onzighi C, Sivaguru M, Judy-March J, Baskin TI, Driouich A: The reb1-1 mutation of Arabidopsis alters the morphology of trichoblasts, the expression of arabinogalactan-proteins and the organization of cortical microtubules. Planta. 2002, 215 (6): 949-958. 10.1007/s00425-002-0836-z.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Rosti J, Barton CJ, Albrecht S, Dupree P, Pauly M, Findlay K, Roberts K, Seifert GJ: UDP-glucose 4-epimerase isoforms UGE2 and UGE4 cooperate in providing UDP-galactose for cell wall biosynthesis and growth of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007, 19 (5): 1565-1579. 10.1105/tpc.106.049619.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Lea PJ, Sodek L, Parry MAJ, Shewry PR, Halford NG: Asparagine in plants. Ann Appl Biol. 2007, 150: 1-26. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00104.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wingler A, Roitsch T: Metabolic regulation of leaf senescence: interactions of sugar signalling with biotic and abiotic stress responses. Plant Biol (Stuttgart, Germany). 2008, 10 (Suppl 1): 50-62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Jang S, Lee B, Kim C, Kim SJ, Yim J, Han JJ, Lee S, Kim SR, An G: The OsFOR1 gene encodes a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) that regulates floral organ number in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 53 (3): 357-369.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and funding

This work was supported by funding from the National Research Foundation (NRF), the Wine Industry Network of Expertise and Technology (Winetech), the South African Table Grape Industry (SATI) and the South African Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP). Post-doctorial funding for EA was provided by Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning, Sweden, and for ENO by Claude Leon Foundation, South Africa. Andreas G.J. Tredoux, Institute for Wine Biotechnology is acknowledged for technical support in optimizing the hormone profile method.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melané A Vivier.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

EA did the microarray data and statistical analyses. JVWB performed the microarrays, qPCR and hormone and lignin profiling experiments. DJ constructed the bioinformatical workflow and graph structures. ENO determined the cell wall composition and CS did the XTH enzyme activity assay. KJD participated in the design of the microarray study. MAV conceived the study.

EA, JVWB, DJ and MAV drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

Erik Alexandersson, John VW Becker contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Table of probes displaying differential expression

Additional file 1:. Table of all probes displaying differential expression. Differential expression (Log2) between control plants and Vvpgip1-transformed lines 37 and 45 (FDR < 0.05). Probes are divided into orthologous clusters based on sequence similarity (see Materials and Methods). Functional category, name, an arbitrary set identification number and number of hybridizing transcripts are given for each orthologous cluster. The sequence similarity (%) and amino acid length of similar sequence for the top hit in Arabidopsis of each probe sequence is also included. If no match was found in Arabidopsis the top hit for rice was instead given. The descriptions presented are derived from the top hits. The level of co-expression of Arabidopsis genes associated to two or more of the orthologous clusters based on sequence similarity are given as Pearson coefficients correlations with different stringency (0.05, 0.1 or 0.2). Asterisk denotes that only a trend (p < 0.15) was seen in Vvpgip1 line 45. (XLS 284 KB)

Additional file 2:Updated Gene Ontology (GO terms) associated with each probe on the TIGR 10 k microarray. Updated GO terms associated with each probe on the TIGR 10 k microarray. GO terms were updated with information retrieved from nine plant species with the help of a graph structure. The table is compatible for use with GOEast if saved as a tab-delimited file. (TXT 2 MB)

A selection of differentially expressed genes

Additional file 3:. Probes are divided into orthologous clusters based on sequence similarity and expression ratios are given in Log2-scale. Top hits based on sequence similarity are given for either Arabidopsis or rice and includes the corresponding gene description. Related citations are given in the heading literature. Shaded orthologous clusters indicate that associated Arabidopsis genes based on sequence identity were co-expressed (Pearson coefficient correlation < 0.2) with one or more additional Arabidopsis genes linked to the orthologous clusters. Asterisks denote that only a similar trend for differential expression was observed in Vvpgip 1 line 45 (FDR < 0.15). For more details on constructions of orthologous clusters and cross-species co-expression analysis, see Materials and Methods. (DOC 163 KB)

Gene ontology enrichments

Additional file 4:. GO enrichment of probes showing significant difference in signal intensity in Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45 in comparison to WT. (A) Biological process (B) Cellular compartment and (C) Molecular function. The gene ontology maps were generated in GOEast [39]. Enriched terms are colored in yellow and the intensity of the color yellow denotes the level of enrichment. Red arrows stand for relationship between two enriched GO terms, black solid arrows stand for relationship between enriched and not enriched terms and black dashed arrows stand for relationship between two not enriched GO terms. (PDF 1021 KB)

MapMan overview of metabolic categories comparing

Additional file 5: Vvpgip1 line 37 and 45. A MapMan mapping file adopted for the TIGR 10 K potato microarray was used [41]. Expression values were filtered after FDR-adjustment (p < 0.05). (PDF 284 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexandersson, E., Becker, J.V., Jacobson, D. et al. Constitutive expression of a grapevine polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein affects gene expression and cell wall properties in uninfected tobacco. BMC Res Notes 4, 493 (2011).

Download citation


  • Salicylic Acid
  • Transgenic Line
  • Pectin
  • Jasmonic Acid
  • Jasmonic Acid Level