- Research article
- Open Access
Occurrence of the invasion associated marker (iam) in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from cattle
- Yasser M Sanad†1,
- Issmat I Kassem†1,
- Zhe Liu1,
- Jun Lin2,
- Jeffrey T LeJeune1 and
- Gireesh Rajashekara1Email author
© Sanad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 19 November 2011
- Accepted: 30 December 2011
- Published: 30 December 2011
The invasion associated marker (iam) has been detected in the majority of invasive Campylobacter jejuni retrieved from humans. Furthermore, the detection of iam in C. jejuni isolated from two important hosts, humans and chickens, suggested a role for this marker in C. jejuni's colonization of multiple hosts. However, no data exist regarding the occurrence of this marker in C. jejuni isolated from non-poultry food-animals such as cattle, an increasingly important source for human infections. Since little is known about the genetics associated with C. jejuni's capability for colonizing physiologically disparate hosts, we investigated the occurrence of the iam in C. jejuni isolated from cattle and assessed the potential of iam-containing cattle and human isolates for chicken colonization and human cell invasion.
Simultaneous RAPD typing and iam-specific PCR analysis of 129 C. jejuni isolated from 1171 cattle fecal samples showed that 8 (6.2%) of the isolates were iam-positive, while 7 (54%) of human-associated isolates were iam-positive. The iam sequences were mostly heterogeneous and occurred in diverse genetic backgrounds. All iam-positive isolates were motile and possessed important genes (cad F, cia B, cdt B) associated with adhesion and virulence. Although certain iam-containing isolates invaded and survived in INT-407 cells in high numbers and successfully colonized live chickens, there was no clear association between the occurrence, allelic sequence, and expression levels of the iam and the aforementioned phenotypes.
We show that the prevalence of iam in cattle C. jejuni is relatively lower as compared to isolates occurring in humans and chickens. In addition, iam was polymorphic and certain alleles occur in cattle isolates that were capable of colonizing and invading chickens and human intestinal cells, respectively. However, the iam did not appear to contribute to the cattle-associated C. jejuni's potential for invasion and intracellular survival in human intestinal cells as well as chicken colonization.
Campylobacter jejuni is an important foodborne pathogen that can cause a variety of infections in humans . Additionally, C. jejuni colonizes important food-animals such as chicken and cattle, which together constitute an important source for human infections with this pathogen . Although C. jejuni can occur in multiple hosts, it is more readily transmissible within species . Once established in a new host, C. jejuni has a remarkable capacity for acquiring genetic material that facilitates adaptation to the host environment . Efficient host colonization can be essential in pathogenesis mechanisms, including host cell invasion and associated sequelae . Furthermore, numerous studies, using live chicken models and in vitro human cell lines, have suggested multiple genetic determinates that are important in C. jejuni's host colonization [4, 5]. However, little is known about genetic factors that might be important for C. jejuni's adaptation to multiple hosts, which is important since the broad host range of C. jejuni complicates on-farm control measures aimed at decreasing its transmission to humans.
An important factor in C. jejuni's host colonization is its capability to attach to- and/or invade epithelial cells in the host's gastrointestinal tract . Yet, different strains of C. jejuni display varying capacities for cellular adherence and invasion, which could be attributed to the presence, absence and/or acquisition of certain genetic determinants that contribute to the pathobiology of this bacterium [7, 8]. Although invasion and host adaptation are influenced by the interaction of multiple genetic factors, several individual components, including outer-membrane proteins and secreted antigens can impact C. jejuni's adherence to and invasion of enterocytes [7, 9, 10]. Of particular interest is the invasion associated marker (iam) that was significantly associated with invasive Campylobacter. This marker was discovered using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis that identified a diagnostic DNA band (1.6 Kb) containing a genetic element (designated later as iam). Although specific PCR analysis showed that the iam was observed in 63% of the invasive isolates retrieved from diarrheic children, the marker was not detected in every potentially invasive isolate and occured in a low percentage of the non-invasive ones. Consequently, it was concluded that mutations/allele variations might have impacted both the detection of the marker and its role in mediating the invasion . However, these assumptions were not tested further and the role of iam in C. jejuni's invasion and adaptation to hosts, whether humans or animals, has not been fully investigated. The limited data available suggest that the occurrence of the iam in C. jejuni might be both dependent on the characteristics of the human population understudy and associated sources of infection [12, 13]. The latter is important since the majority of Campylobacter isolated from chicken carcasses, an established source for Campylobacter infections, also possessed the iam[13, 14], which suggests that the iam might play a role in the transmission of Campylobacter and/or its adaptation to different host(s). Since no data are available concerning the occurrence of iam in C. jejuni isolated from other hosts, the aforementioned conclusion regarding the iam association with multiple-host colonization needs further analysis. Consequently, it was important to investigate the occurrence of iam in C. jejuni from other important sources such as cattle [15–17] and test their potential for colonization of humans and chickens, respectively. If iam is associated with C. jejuni's potential for colonization of multiple hosts, this would facilitate understanding the interactive impact of major animal sources such as chicken and cattle in the transmission of Campylobacter. Therefore, we investigated the occurrence of the iam in C. jejuni isolated from cattle (n = 1171) and determined the association of this element and its alleles with the pathogen's invasion potential of a human intestinal cell line and colonization of 1-day old chickens.
Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from cattle and human samples
Fecal samples (n = 1171) were collected from cattle at 4 geographic locations (North, Mid-West, East, South) across the U.S. To isolate C. jejuni, 1 g of each fecal sample was enriched in Preston broth for 48 h at 42°C under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2). From the enrichments that showed growth, an inoculum (100 μl) was spread onto modified Cefoperazone Charcoal Deoxycholate Agar (mCCDA) plates, which were then incubated for an additional 48 h at 42°C under microaerobic conditions . Colonies exhibiting typical Campylobacter phenotype (flat and grey with metallic sheen) were selected from the plates and subjected to species-specific PCR analysis to confirm their identity [19, 20]. The size of the PCR products was determined using a 1 Kb DNA ladder and detection was confirmed by comparison to a PCR product generated from a C. jejuni 81-176 (wild-type strain), which was used as a positive control in all PCR analysis. Negative controls (reactions with no DNA templates) were included in all PCR analysis to ensure specific product amplification.
Additional C. jejuni isolates from human hosts were acquired from a medical center (The Ohio State University). These isolates represented different sporadic human infections and their identity was further confirmed using the aforementioned PCR analysis.
Detection of iam using RAPD typing and PCR
To determine if the C. jejuni originating from cattle and human samples carried the iam locus (a diagnostic 1.6 Kb band), all isolates were subjected to DNA fingerprinting using RAPD analysis as described in Carvalho et al. . RAPD-PCR products were then analyzed using 1.4% agarose gels, containing 0.5 μg/ml of ethidium bromide. RAPD fingerprints were documented and dendrograms were constructed using BioNumerics 5.1 software (Applied Maths, Inc, USA).
C. jejuni isolates that carried the iam locus as identified by the RAPD fingerprinting were tested to further confirm the presence of the iam locus. This was achieved using PCR analysis to detect a 518-bp DNA fragment inside the 1.6 kb band that was earlier identified as the iam locus by RAPD fingerprinting as described in Carvalho et al. .
Detection of virulence-associated genes using PCR
C. jejuni isolates that were identified as iam-positive using both RAPD and iam-specific PCR analysis, hereafter referred to as the iam-positive C. jejuni, were screened for genes that are important in the pathobiology of this pathogen. Specifically, PCR analysis was performed for the detection of the cad F (Campylobacter adherence factor), cia B (Campylobacter invasion antigens), and cdt B (cytolethal distending toxin) genes as described elsewhere [10, 21, 22]. Genomic DNA from C. jejuni strain 81-176 was used as a positive control, while negative controls contained the PCR reagent mix with no DNA templates.
To establish that iam-positive C. jejuni were putatively capable of host invasion and colonization, it was important to establish that the isolates were not defective in motility. For this purpose, the motility of the iam-positive C. jejuni was tested using semi-solid (0.4%) Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates as described previously . The diameter of the zone of motility was measured and compared to that of C. jejuni 81- 176 (positive control). The motility assays were repeated twice for each isolate, which were also tested in duplicates per each assay.
In vitro cell invasion and intracellular survival assay using human epithelial cell lines (INT-407)
The human intestinal cell invasion assays were performed using iam-negative and iam-positive C. jejuni isolated from both cattle and humans. For this purpose, 105 cells ml-1 of INT-407 (human embryonic intestine, ATCC CCL 6) were seeded into each well of a 24-well tissue culture plates in Minimum Essential Medium Eagle (MEM, Fisher scientific, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Fisher scientific, PA, USA). The plates were then incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 until semi-confluent mono-layers were obtained [24, 25]. For infection with C. jejuni, the INT-407 mono-layers were washed three times and covered in MEM supplemented with 1% FBS. Similarly, the C. jejuni cultures were washed three times and suspended in MEM supplemented with 1% FBS to obtain 107 bacteria ml-1. One ml of bacterial suspension was added to each well containing the INT-407 semi-confluent monolayer, achieving a 1:100 multiplicity of infection (MOI). After 3 h of incubation, cells were treated with gentamicin (150 μg ml-1) for 2 h to inhibit the bacteria that did not invade the cells. The infected mono-layers were washed with 1× PBS, lysed using 0.01% Triton X-100 and serially diluted (10-fold) in 1× PBS. One hundred μl of each dilution were spread on MH agar plates. The agar plates were then incubated for 48 h at 42°C under microaerobic conditions, after which colony forming units (CFU) were counted. Each isolate was tested in duplicate per assay, while the experiment was repeated twice on separate occasions. C. jejuni 81-176 and NCTC11168 were used as controls in all invasion assays. A negative control that consisted of a well containing only INT-407 with no bacteria was processed in parallel to the infected monolayers.
For the intracellular survival assays , Campylobacter cultures and the INT-407 cells were processed as described above. However, after treatment with gentamicin, the monolayers were covered with MEM containing 1% FBS and gentamicin (10 μg ml-1) and incubated for additional 24 h at 37°C. Then the monolayers were washed three times with MEM containing 1% FBS, lysed and processed as described above. The number of viable intracellular bacteria was determined by counting CFUs.
Phylogenetic analysis of the iam alleles
To determine if the iam sequences were heterogeneous and examine relationships between the iam occurring in cattle C. jejuni isolates and those from human samples, the 518 bp iam fragments were sequenced and subjected to a phylogenetic analysis. Briefly, iam-specific PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) and commercially sequenced (Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center, OARDC, OH, USA). The identity of the sequences was confirmed by BLAST analysis. The sequences were then exported to MEGA4 software , aligned and analyzed. The phylogenetic tree was drawn using the Neighbor-Joining method to determine the evolutionary relationship among the sequences. The iam sequences that were analyzed in this work were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers: HM533957-HM533968, JF927289-JF927291 and HQ317917.
Expression analysis for the iam using quantitative real-time PCR (q-RT PCR)
List of primers used in this study
Sequence (5 '-3 ')
'5 '-GGACGGTAACTAGTTTAGTATT-3 '
5 '-CTATTTTATTTTTGAGTGCTTGTG-3 '
5 '-GCTTTATTTGCCATTTGTTTTATTA-3 '
C. jejuni specific
5 '-TTGAAGGTAATTTAGATATG-3 '
5 '-CTAATACCTAAAGTTGAAAC-3 '
cad F detection
5 '-GTTAAAATCCCCTGCTATCAACCA-3 '
5 '-GTTGGCACTTGGAATTTGCAAGGC-3 '
cdt B detection
5 '-TTTTTATCAGTCCTTA-3 '
5 '-TTTCGGTATCATTAGC-3 '
cia B detection
5 '-GTGGATGCGA-3 '
5 '-GCGCAAAATATTATCACCC-3 '
5 '-TTCACGACTACTATGCGG-3 '
5 '-AACATTAGCGAGGAAGAT-3 '
5 '-GTATATTCTTTAAGAGGGGTAG-3 '
5 '-AACATTAGCGAGGAAGAT-3 '
5 '-TCATTTAAACCGACCATTT-3 '
5 '-AAGATAGCATACAAGAACT-3 '
5 '-ATTCACGACTACTATAAGG-3 '
Typing of iam- positive C. jejuni using pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
To determine the relatedness and diversity of genomic backgrounds of iam-positive C. jejuni, these isolates from cattle and human samples were analyzed using PFGE as described by Ribot et al. . The resulting PFGE patterns were documented and analyzed using the BioNumerics 5.1 software (Applied Maths Inc, TX, USA). Similarity and clustering analysis of the PFGE patterns were performed using the Dice Coefficient and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages, UPGMA (optimization of 1% and position tolerance of 1.5%), respectively.
In vivo chicken colonization assay
Data were presented as means ± standard error (SE) and assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's significance test. A P value of < 0.05 was used to indicate if differences were statistically significant.
Results and discussion
A total of 129 C. jejuni were isolated from fecal samples (n = 1171) collected from cattle in 4 geographic locations (North, South, Midwest, East) in the U.S. Additionally, 13 C. jejuni isolates were acquired from different sporadic human infections. The identity of the C. jejuni isolates was confirmed using PCR. RAPD analysis was performed as described by Carvalho et al.  and showed that 10.8% of the cattle isolates possessed the 1.6 Kb DNA band that potentially harbors iam as compared to 54% of the human isolates. Furthermore, iam-specific PCR  showed that 6.8% of the cattle isolates were iam-positive as compared to 54% of the human isolates. Randomly selected isolates that did not show the 1.6 Kb band after RAPD analysis were also observed to be iam-negative using iam-specific PCR analysis. The discrepancy between the RAPD and the PCR results for the cattle isolates was not surprising since, as suggested by Carvalho et al. , the PCR primers might not necessarily detect iam mutated fragments/alleles. Additionally, mutations might spuriously give rise to a 1.6 Kb band that can be mistaken for the iam locus. Therefore, in order to limit iam false-positives that might be detected using either method, we selected isolates that possessed both the 1.6 Kb fragment and the iam-PCR product, referred to as iam-positive strains, for further analysis.
Analysis of the iam marker using the BLAST algorithm.
C. jejuni hypothetical integral membrane protein (iamB) gene (partial cds); and ABC transporter (iamA) gene (complete cds)
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni IA3902
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni NCTC 11168
C. jejuni RM1221
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni 81116
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni 81-176
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni JL110034*
C. jejuni subsp. doylei 269.97
C. lari RM2100
It is possible that the presence of iam gene sequences might not be necessarily associated with the expression of its products, which might explain the lack of an apparent relationship between iam and invasiveness. Therefore, the expression of the iam was assayed for the cattle isolates using q-RT PCR, which showed that the expression levels of the iam varied between the strains (Figure 3B). Bov-3 and Bov-6 with low iam expression levels and Bov-9 with no detectable expression were still capable of invading and surviving in INT-407 cells (Figure 2A and 2B). Although isolates (Bov-7 and Bov-10) with iam expression similar to that of C. jejuni 81-176 exhibited high invasion and intracellular survival potential, isolates with relatively the highest iam expression (Bov-11 and 12) did not possess the highest capacities for the aforementioned phenotypes. Since iam expression properties in the tested isolates were consistent using two sets of q-RT PCR primers (data not shown), it was concluded that the expression of iam did not seem to confer any clear advantage in terms of invasion and intracellular survival.
The virulence traits of C. jejuni might likely be affected by the interaction of several genetic elements [9, 10, 30]. Hence, the role of the iam in the pathobiology of C. jejuni, if any, would likely depend on other factors (e.g. flagella, adhesins), which in turn might need to occur in specific allelic sequences to mediate their impact. It was interesting to note that the pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis showed that the genotypes of the iam-positive strains were mostly diverse (Figure 1). This indicated that the iam is occurring in diverse genotypic backgrounds that, along with the iam sequence heterogeneity, might impact the role of this locus in the pathobiology of C. jejuni. Subsequently, it was important to investigate whether the iam-containing isolates harbored genes that are commonly associated with C. jejuni adherence and virulence in order to ensure that our observations can be attributed to iam and not other genetic defects. Subsequently, PCR analysis showed that the iam-containing isolates carried the cad F, cia B, and cdt A genes (Figure 1) that are important for C. jejuni pathogenesis [9, 10, 12]. Since many of the tested isolates were not defective in invasion of INT-407 cells, PCR detection of the aforementioned virulence genes was satisfactory to further confirm that the iam-containing isolates did not appear to be deficient in genes that might be important for attachment and invasion of INT-407 cells.
Carvalho et al.  only correlated the occurrence of the iam in a certain number of invasive C. jejuni using typing techniques, while acknowledging the existence of the marker in a relatively smaller percentage of non-invasive strains. Our analysis was more rigorous and included attempts to associate the iam with several important phenotypes. We report that the iam does not necessarily contribute to invasion and survival in human intestinal cells or colonization of chickens. Subsequently, the use of the iam as a virulence determinant in epidemiological studies (e.g. references 11-14) might be potentially misleading and might require reevaluation. However, it must be noted that despite our extensive sampling efforts, only a limited number of iam-containing C. jejuni were isolated in this study. This small number of isolates tested in this study necessitates a cautious interpretation of the data regarding the contribution of iam to invasive properties of C. jejuni. This can be clarified using alternative approaches such as testing deletion mutants of this marker in future experiments.
Research in Dr. Rajashekara's laboratory is supported by the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), The Ohio State University, and the USDA grant 2007-03109. Yasser M. Sanad is supported by a PhD scholarship from the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education.
- Vandamme P, De Ley J: Proposal for a New Family, Campylobacteraceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991, 41: 451-455. 10.1099/00207713-41-3-451.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allos BM: Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 32: 1201-1206. 10.1086/319760.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCarthy ND, Colles FM, Dingle KE, Bagnall MC, Manning G, Maiden MC, Falush D: Host-associated genetic import in Campylobacter jejuni. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 267-272. 10.3201/eid1302.060620.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Konkel ME, Monteville MR, Rivera-Amill V, Joens LA: The pathogenesis of Campylobacter jejuni-mediated enteritis. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2001, 2: 55-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hendrixson DR, DiRita VJ: Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in commensal colonization of the chick gastrointestinal tract. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52: 471-484. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.03988.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ketley JM: Pathogenesis of enteric infection by Campylobacter. Microbiology. 1997, 143: 5-21. 10.1099/00221287-143-1-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fearnley C, Manning G, Bagnall M, Javed MA, Wassenaar TM, Newell DG: Identification of hyperinvasive Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from poultry and human clinical sources. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57: 570-580. 10.1099/jmm.0.47803-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofreuter D, Novik V, Galán JE: Metabolic diversity in Campylobacter jejuni enhances specific tissue colonization. Cell Host Microbe. 2008, 4: 425-433. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.10.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Konkel ME, Garvis SG, Tipton SL, Anderson DE, Cieplak W: Identification and molecular cloning of a gene encoding a fibronectin-binding protein (Cad F) from Campylobacter jejuni. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 24: 953-963. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4031771.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Konkel ME, Gray SA, Kim BJ, Garvis SG, Yoon J: Identification of the enteropathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli based on the cadF virulence gene and its product. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 510-517.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho AC, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Ramos-Cervantes P, Cervantes LE, Jiang X, Pickering LK: Molecular characterization of invasive and noninvasive Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1353-1359. 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1353-1359.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Mahmeed A, Senok AC, Ismaeel AY, Bindayna KM, Tabbara KS, Botta GA: Clinical relevance of virulence genes in Campylobacter jejuni isolates in Bahrain. J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 55: 839-843.Google Scholar
- Rozynek E, Dzierzanowska-Fangrat K, Jozwiak P, Popowski J, Korsak D, Dzierzanowska D: Prevalence of potential virulence markers in Polish Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates obtained from hospitalized children and from chicken carcasses. J Med Microbiol. 2005, 54: 615-619. 10.1099/jmm.0.45988-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korsak D, Dzierzanowska-Fangrat K, Popowskip J, Rozynek E: Incidence of the virulence markers iam in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli strains isolated from poultry carcases. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2004, 55: 307-312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Haan CP, Kivistö RI, Hakkinen M, Corander J, Hänninen ML: Multilocus sequence types of Finnish bovine Campylobacter jejuni isolates and their attribution to human infections. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10: 200-10.1186/1471-2180-10-200.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grove-White DH, Leatherbarrow AJ, Cripps PJ, Diggle PJ, French NP: Molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni in ruminants. Epidemiol Infect. 2010, 7: 1-11.Google Scholar
- Wilson DJ, Gabriel E, Leatherbarrow AJ, Cheesbrough J, Gee S, Bolton E, Fox A, Fearnhead P, Hart CA, Diggle PJ: Tracing the source of campylobacteriosis. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4: e1000203-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000203.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engberg J, On SLW, Harrington CS, Gerner-Smidt P: Prevalence of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter, and Sutterella spp. in Human Fecal Samples as Estimated by a Reevaluation of Isolation Methods for Campylobacters. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 286-291.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Linton D, Lawson AJ, Owen RJ, Stanley J: PCR detection, identification to species level and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 2568-2572.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Denis M, Soumet C, Rivoal K, Ermel G, Blivet D, Salvat G, Colin P: Development of a m-PCR assay for simultaneous identification of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1999, 29: 406-410. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1999.00658.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Datta S, Niwa H, Itoh K: Prevalence of 11 pathogenic genes of Campylobacter jejuni by PCR in strains from humans, poultry meat and broiler and bovine faeces. J Med Microbiol. 2003, 52: 345-348. 10.1099/jmm.0.05056-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bang DD, Scheutz F, Gradel KO, Nielsen EM, Pedersen K, Engberg J, Gerner-Smidt P, Handberg K, Madsen M: Detection of seven virulence and toxin genes of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from different sources and cytolethal distending toxin production suggest potential diversity of pathogenic properties among isolates. Genome Lett. 2003, 2: 62-72.Google Scholar
- Fields JA, Thompson SA: Campylobacter jejuni CsrA mediates oxidative stress responses, biofilm formation, and host cell invasion. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 3411-3416. 10.1128/JB.01928-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monteville MR, Yoon JE, Konkel ME: Maximal adherence and invasion of INT 407 cells by Campylobacter jejuni requires the CadF outer-membrane protein and microfilament reorganization. Microbiology. 2003, 149: 153-165. 10.1099/mic.0.25820-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Konkel ME, Kim BJ, Rivera-Amill V, Garvis SG: Bacterial secreted proteins are required for the internalisation of Campylobacter jejuni into cultured mammalian cells. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 32: 691-701. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01376.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Konkel ME, Hayes SF, Joens LA, Cieplak W: Characteristics of the internalization and intracellular survival of Campylobacter jejuni in human epithelial cell cultures. Microb Pathog. 1992, 13: 357-370. 10.1016/0882-4010(92)90079-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ribot EM, Fitzgerald C, Kubota K, Swaminathan B, Barrett TJ: Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1889-1894. 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1889-1894.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu L, Kopecko DJ: Campylobacter jejuni 81- 176 associates with microtubules and dynein during invasion of human intestinal cells. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 4171-4182.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Poly F, Ewing C, Goon S, Hickey TE, Rockabrand D, Majam G, Lee L, Phan J, Savarino NJ, Guerry P: Heterogeneity of a Campylobacter jejuni protein that is secreted through the flagellar filament. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 3859-3867. 10.1128/IAI.00159-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeng X, Xu F, Lin J: Whole genome sequencing of a unique Campylobacter jejuni strain with functional ferric Enterobactin acquisition system [abstract B-2986]. Abstr Gen Meet Am Soc Microbiol. 2010, 213-Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.