Skip to main content

Morphological and genetic changes induced by excess Zn in roots of Medicago truncatula A17 and a Zn accumulating mutant



Nutrient fluxes associated with legume-rhizobia symbioses are poorly understood and little is known regarding the influence of abiotic stresses on development and maintenance of N-fixing nodules and root system architecture (RSA). We examined effects of Zn on nodule development and structure, root architecture, and expression of nodulation-related miRNAs in Medicago truncatula and the mutant, raz (requires additional Zn).


Excess Zn increased root and shoot associated Zn in both genotypes, however, raz plants had lower root associated Zn than WT plants. Roots of raz plants exposed to excess Zn had less volume, surface area, and total length compared to WT plants. Raz plants had lower lateral root number than WT plants. Excess Zn was found to increase root diameter in both genotypes. The Mn Translocation Factor (TfMn) increased in response to Zn in both genotypes; this was more pronounced in raz plants. TfZn was higher in raz plants and reduced in both genotypes in response to Zn. Nodulation was not influenced by Zn treatment or plant genotype. MicroRNA166 was upregulated under excess Zn in WT plants.


Neither the raz mutation nor Zn treatment affected nodulation, however, raz plants had altered RSA compared with WT and responded differently to Zn, implying the mutation potentially modulates RSA responses to Zn but doesn’t play a direct role in nodulation. MicroRNA166 was significantly induced in WT plants by excess Zn, warranting further investigation into the potential role it plays in controlling RSA.



Medicago truncatula has been established as a model legume species because it has many desirable attributes, including, a small diploid genome, short generation time [1], and some level of transformability and regenerability in some genotypes [2]. There are also a number of genetic resources available, such as, ESTs, a nearly complete sequence of gene rich regions of the genome, and genetic and physical maps [2]. Wild-type M. truncatula plants are not known to accumulate or hyperaccumulate metals, however, M. truncatula raz (for requires additional Zn) is an ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) generated, Zn accumulating mutant first characterized in 2003 [3]. This mutant has been shown to accumulate greater than 10,000 μg Zn/ g d. wt. associated with root tissues and greater than 400 μg Zn/ g d. wt. associated with shoot tissues when grown in nutrient solutions containing 3 μM Zn and 2 μM Mn [3]. When grown in nutrients solutions defined by the authors as adequate for wild-type (WT) plants, raz exhibits a high level of leaf necrosis and subsequent leaf loss, which is very similar to WT plants grown in Zn deficient conditions [3]. Both leaf necrosis and leaf loss were partially ameliorated by providing the plants with 3 μM Zn and 0.2 μM Mn, however, raz produced less biomass than WT plants regardless of Zn treatment [3]. Segregation analysis of progeny from crosses of WT M. truncatula and third generation raz plants revealed that a single, recessive gene is likely responsible for the raz phenotype [3]. The mutation was localized to the upper arm of linkage group 7, as defined by Kulikova et al. [4] through genetic mapping studies of raz x M. truncatula A20 populations [3]. The phenotype observed in raz plants is thought to be generated by a functional Zn deficiency [3]. The raz phenotype, as characterized by Ellis et al. [3], was observed in non-nodulated plants, therefore, the phenotypic consequences of the mutation in nodulated plants have not yet been adequately explored. Zinc toxicity has been found to have numerous affects on plant growth. Studies in wheat and cucumber have revealed that high Zn decreases percent germination and inhibits root elongation as well as hypocotyl and coleoptile growth [5]. Elevated Zn has also been found to reduce root elongation rate in 4-weeks-old seedlings of Picea abies[6] and in rye grass [7]. At pZn activity = 5.25 and 5.0, Ibekwe et al. [8] found nodulation to be inhibited in alfalfa and Zn induced root damage was thought to be the cause. Additionally, zinc toxicity was found to cause deposition of lipids on the lumen surface of xylem vessel walls and deposition of phenolic compounds on the walls of secondary vessel cells [9]. High Zn may also inhibit cell division and elongation and increase root diameter [10, 11].

A number of studies have recently emerged covering the response of microRNAs (miRNAs) to nutrient availability [1223]; [24], but to date none have reported Zn responsive miRNAs. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNA (21 nucleotides long) that are important players in regulation of almost all aspects of plant development, and the RNA interference (RNAi) related pathways. Through RNAi machinery, genes are posttranscriptionally regulated by miRNA resulting in cleavage of mRNA, or inhibition of mRNA translation due to the binding of the miRNA to the 3' UTR (untranslated region) [25]. RNAi pathways are important during biological development [25] and in adaptive plant responses to nutrient stress [26]. Studies have revealed the role of miRNA in sulfur and phosphate homeostasis, as discussed by Chiou [26]. One miRNA, miRNA 399, is thought to be a long distance signal in phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis[18]. It has also been shown that miRNAs regulate the expression of genes responsible for Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase under Cu limiting conditions in Arabidopsis[27].

In shoots of A. thaliana, miR166 and the close relative miR165 have been found to be involved in regulating the class III homeodomain-leucine Zipper (HD-ZIP III) family of transcription factors [28]. The dynamic, tissue specific regulation of these two miRNAs along with their associated targets are thought to be essential for multiple aspects of proper shoot development including, shoot apical meristem and floral development [29], vascular development in Arabidsopsis inflorescences [28], radial patterning [30, 31], and initiation of floral and lateral shoot meristems [32]. Less is known about the function of these miRNAs in roots. Carlsbecker et al. [33], reported findings in support of a role for miR166b and miR165a in xylem cell identity and development in Arabidopsis. The authors propose induction of SHR (SHORT ROOT) in the metaxylem is followed by intercellular signaling which leads to the induction of SCR (SCARECROW) in the endodermis, where SHR and SCR induce miR165a/miR166b. The miRNAs are then thought to become mobile and migrate toward the metaxylem, regulating HD-ZIP III activity, leading to definition of cellular identity. Interestingly, Carlsbecker et al. [33] found miR166a to be undetectable in Arabidopsis roots and cite similar findings in other studies, but in M. truncatula, miR166a was found to be expressed in roots and nodules and to be involved in vascular patterning and nodule and lateral root formation [34]. Boualem et al. [34], found 2x35S:MtMIR166a overexpression resulted in reduced lateral root and nodule formation accompanied by, and possibly resulting from, disorganized vascular bundling. Overexpression of MtMIR166a also led to reduced transcript levels of three of the MtHB sub-class of HD-ZIP III genes, MtCNA1, MtCNA2, and MtHB8, however, the exact function of these genes remains unknown [34]. Expression of miR166 and the HD-ZIP III targets within the nodule are not mutually exclusive, with the miRNA and the MtHBs exemplifying co-regulation with respect to space and time. MicroRNA169 has been implicated in drought response in rice [23] and Arabidopsis[35], as well as in N and P limitation [36]. During nodulation in M. truncatula, miR169 is essential for proper nodule development by restricting MtHAP2-1 transcripts primarily to the meristematic region of the nodule through posttranscriptional cleavage and overexpression of miR169 leads to the inhibition of nodule development presumably due to the lack of temporal-spatial control over MtHAP2-1 expression [37]. Pant et al. [36] found many miR169s to be repressed during N limitation in Arabidopsis and suggested that this may be a mechanism for detecting N deficiency and at least partially initiating nodulation through the mechanisms proposed by Combier et al. [37]. Rapid drops in miR169 transcript levels in phloem sap in response to N and P limitation also indicate the possibility of miR169 as a long-distance signal, whereby N and P deficiency are first detected in the shoots [36]; currently this hypothesis remains untested. As described above, miR166 and miR169 are thought to be involved in different aspects of nodulation. MicroRNA166 is likely involved in vascular bundling and it is thought that positional information derived from the stele is involved in lateral root and nodule development [38, 39]. MiR166 might also be involved later in nodule development through tight regulation of MtHB expression [34]. The involvement of miR169 in nodulation is thought to be through maintenance of the meristematic region by restricting MtHAP2-1 expression primarily to this developmental region [37]. The objectives of this study were to examine root architectural responses and nodule developmental processes associated with Zn in wild type Medicago truncatula or a raz mutant. We examined nodule development and structure over a 28 day time course, recorded whole root system parameters, examined metal concentrations associated with shoot and root tissues, and quantified Zn responses of the nodulation-related miRNAs, miR166 and miR169, in nodulated WT and raz plants exposed to ideal and excess Zn. The root and nodule morphological data were gathered by using a combination of confocal microscopy and WinRHIZO image analysis software. MiRNA expression levels were quantified using qRT-PCR. In attempting to develop Zn fortified legume crops, it will be very beneficial to understand the influence of Zn on root architecture and nodule formation. Studying miRNA expression in M. truncatula will give us insights into gene regulation that is applicable to many N-fixing legumes, (i.e. Soybean, Chickpea, Lentil, Common Bean), which provide essential oils and proteins with little nitrogen input compared to non-leguminous crops. Exploration of the role of miRNA in symbiotic nodule development in M. truncatula has led to the identification of many genes and their associated miRNAs essential to nodulation [34, 37, 40].

Materials and methods

Plant growth

M. truncatula raz and A17 seedlings were grown in a modified RainForest™ 236 aeroponic growth system (General Hydroponics, Sebastopol, CA, USA) (Additional file 1: Figure S1a). The Rainforest ™ system comes equipped with a vortex style pump, (Additional file 1: Figure S1b) which is ideal for hydroponic experiments requiring microbial inoculation as it minimizes microbial death associated with impeller type pumps that macerate the microbes or create too great a pressure differential. However, we found that the water droplet size released from the pump was too large for M. truncatula resulting in diminished lateral root formation, root growth and nodule number. To reduce the droplet size we attached a 125 μm polypropylene mesh around the circumference of the pump bracket (Additional file 1: Figure S1c) which reduced the spray to a fine mist. The smaller nutrient solution droplets promoted development of more lateral roots and generally enhance root growth, nodulation and plant health. Plant inserts accompanying the RainForest™ 236 unit were replaced with slimmer panels constructed from black acrylic through which 35, 5/16” holes were drilled every inch to accommodate plants (Additional file 1: Figure S1d). These panels can be easily lifted to access root tissue (Additional file 1: Figure S1e). The hydro units and all materials used for the preparation of nutrient solutions were acid washed in 10% HCl or 10% HCl-10% HNO3, and further, the hydro units were surface sterilized and allowed to dry prior to sowing plants. WT and raz seeds were acid scarified and surface sterilized and then put on plates to germinate overnight in a dark drawer at room temperature. The next day plants of each genotype were sown into three black plant supports (Additional file 1: Figure S1d) by inserting their radical through the 5/16” hole. Prior to sowing the panels were covered with plastic wrap to support seedlings and provide a barrier to water loss or contamination to the reservoir. To maintain adequate humidity the system was outfitted with clear plastic domes and the plant foliage periodically sprayed with DDI water. Plants were grown at Room Temperature ± 3°C with 14 hours light (~5,382 lx) and 10 hours dark. Plantlets were grown in N replete conditions for five days, then N-starved for 5 days. On the sixth day after starving plants, solutions were inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti. Zn exposures were performed in modified 1/2x Lullien solutions (Lullien et al., 1987) at pH 6.5. “Ideal Zn” = 0.35 μM Zn (pZn activity ~9.85 with N and ~9.84 without N) and “High Zn” = 18 μM Zn (pZn activity ~7.55 with and without N) as calculated by GeoChem-EZ [41]. The nutrients and concentrations in Table 1 were entered into the software and free activities were estimated using the following criteria: fixed pH = 6.5, convergence criterion = 1e-4, number of iterations = 50, solids were allowed to precipitate, and ionic strength was estimated using a guess of 0.1 M/L (Table 2). Na2-EDTA concentrations were altered to augment Zn activities and maintain similar activities of other ions across treatments.

Table 1 Nutrient solution modified from Lullien et al.[47]
Table 2 Results of GeoChem-EZ analysis of nutrients solutions in Table 1

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

Plants were harvested at two time points, 10 dpi, while nodules are developing, and at 15 dpi, when WT nodules should be mature [42]. Upon harvesting, plants were separated into roots and shoots, massed and flash frozen in liquid N2, with any damaged or dying tissue being removed. Samples were stored in −80°C until further processing. Total RNA containing microRNA was isolated from whole root tissues of 3 bioreps (5 plants each) using the mirVana™ miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantity and quality of total RNA was assessed using a Cary 50 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Varian Australia Pty Ltd., USA). DNase treatment was performed on 10 μg total RNA in 50 μl reactions containing 2 μl DNase using TURBO™ DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 μg total RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The same kit and RNA quantity was used for miRNA cDNA synthesis but random primers were replaced with 1 μM stem-loop primers specific to miR166 and miR169. The pulsed reverse transcription method described by Varkonyi-Gasic et al. [43] was used to generate cDNA for each miRNA in separate reactions. QRT-PCR was performed using 20 μl Power SYBR Green Master Mix reactions containing 2 μl of 1/10 diluted cDNA and the Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus 96-well plate system (Foster City, CA, USA) (See Additional file 2: Table S1 for primer concentrations). To amplify miR166 and miR169 along with the reference mRNA gene, actin-11, simultaneously it was necessary to modify the method established by Chen et al. [44] and refined by Varkonyi-Gasic et al. [43]. In short, the 1 sec extension step at 72°C was adjusted to 10 seconds which aided in achieving adequate primer efficiencies (Additional file 2: Table S1), particularly for actin-11. Primers were obtained from IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, USA). All miRNA real-time primers and RT primers were designed according to methods developed by Chen et al. (2005). Primer sequences for actin-11 were used from Boualem et al. [34]. Fast PCR [45] was used to design and test (in silico) real-time primers. Sensitivity for primer detection was set to “3” as advised by the programmers. Amplification specificity was determined via melt-curve analysis and observing products on 4% agarose gel in TBE buffer. Mortars, pestles, and spatulas used in RNA extraction were washed and baked at 180°C overnight and RNase Zap (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was used to reduce the likelihood of RNase contamination. Real-time data were analyzed using GenEx Pro gene expression analysis software (version and Systat and SAS statistical analysis software. The delta-delta Ct method was used to determine relative expression. The average relative expression of all treatments is set to zero, thus, values above zero indicate greater than average expression and values below zero indicate less than average expression. Standard error is the error of each biogroup (composed of 3 bioreps each). The Tukey’s post-hoc analysis was used to evaluate statistical differences between groups.

Confocal light microscopy

Nodule development and bacterial occupancy were monitored via confocal microscopy using SYTO13 (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) as described by Haynes et al. [46]. Briefly, root sections containing nodules were harvested into a Petri dish containing 80 mM PIPES buffer at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post inoculation (dpi). A 7x-45x trinocular stereo zoom microscope (AmScope, Chino, Ca, USA) was used to visualize the nodules while they were isolated from the root segments and bisected lengthwise using a double-edged razorblade. Bisected nodule halves were then transferred to 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 80 mM PIPES buffer. Bisects were stained at room temperature for approximately 15–20 minutes in 1 ml of 80 mM PIPES buffer containing 3 μM SYTO 13 (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA). Nodules were then rinsed thrice in 80 mM PIPES buffer to remove excess dye. Stained nodule bisects were transferred with a minimal amount of PIPES solution to appropriate slides (Corning, Inc., Corning, NY, USA). Confocal imaging was performed with a Leica TCS SP5 inverted laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, Pa.) at 7 dpi and with a Leica SP1 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, Pa.) for the remaining time points. In both cases, SYTO 13 excitation was achieved with an Argon helium laser (488 nM). Images were obtained in single layers (2-D) and multiple layers (3-D) depending on nodule orientation and the desired information. ImageJ (MacBiophotonics) was used to render single maximum-intensity projections, to scale the images, and to perform general analyses. Nucleic acid distribution (and hence bacterial occupancy) is depicted as green in the confocal images. Fluorescent intensities were adjusted to minimize maximum intensities, then contrast was normalized at +20%.

Total metal analysis

At 24 dpi, raz and WT plants grown in High and Ideal Zn were harvested and separated into roots and shoots. Tissue was massed and washed in 0.001 M CaCl2 to remove weakly sorbed cations and samples stored at −20°C for future analysis. Prior to ICP-MS analysis samples were freeze-dried for 3 days and massed into 15 ml metal free polypropylene centrifuge tubes (VWR Scientific). Samples were acid digested using an open vessel microwave digestion system (CEM MARS Express, Mathews, NC). Digestions were performed in two steps, first in 750 μl of trace metal grade HNO3 at 100°C for 10 minutes and then, after samples were cooled, 250 μl of H202 was added and the samples were heated again at 100°C for 10 minutes. Digestions were then brought to 15 ml using DDI H20. Concentrations of Zn, Mn, and Mo were determined using an Agilent 7500 series ICP-MS (Santa Clara, Ca).

Root morphology

At 10 dpi roots of M. truncatula WT and raz grown in High and Ideal Zn were excised and examined to determine the influence of Zn on root morphology. For each genotype x treatment group, the roots of 5 plants were scanned and several root parameters, including total root length, average diameter, and total surface area, were recorded via WinRhizo Pro (Regent Instruments, Quebec, Canada). Lateral root and nodule counts were taken interactively using scanned images.


Both the raz mutation and Zn treatment have little effect on nodule phenotype and most differences observed in root morphology are genotype dependent

We examined nodules from WT and raz plants via confocal microscopy over a 28 day time course to determine the effects of Zn treatment on nodule development (Figure 1). We found no significant alteration in nodule development or structure in relation to Zn treatment or genotype in both raz and WT plants. Raz nodules in High and Ideal Zn treatments developed similarly to those of WT plants in the same treatment. This supports similar findings in M. sativa, where Zn was not found to alter nodule function, however, it is in conflict with results of Haynes et al. [46] which reported enlarged vacuoles in raz nodules. At 7 dpi, from nodule tip to stele, we observed the nodule meristem, prefixation zone and interzone (Figure 1). The quality of the confocal micrograph for the High Zn treated raz nodule at 7 dpi is poor, however, the micrographs for time points beyond this show no difference from those of the WT plants indicating that this was likely a sampling error and not a treatment effect. The N-fixation zone is expected to be underdeveloped at this stage. At 14 dpi we see the additional development of the N-fixation zone and the initiation of the senescence zone. From 14 to 28 dpi the senescence zone is expanding as the entire nodule elongates. Our studies did not consider nodule function, however, light microscope images of bisected WT and raz nodules appeared pink indicating the presence of leghemoglobin and the likelihood that nodules were able to fix N (unpublished data). Furthermore, Ibekwe et al. [8] found little difference in N2 fixation by nodules of M. sativa exposed to various levels of Zn as determined by acetylene reduction assays. Figure 2 shows the influence of Zn treatment and plant genotype on overall root system architecture at 10 dpi. Raz plants had significantly fewer lateral roots in Ideal and High Zn compared to WT (Figure 2a), however, no genotype or treatment effect was observed with respect to the number of nodules (Figure 2b). For both WT and raz, we observed nodule numbers much lower than those recorded by Ibekwe et al. [8] in alfalfa (174 at pZn ~ 8) exposed to similar Zn activities; this may be a result of differences in the species or in experimental design. Root elongation was inhibited by excess Zn in raz compared to WT (Figure 2c.), implying the mutation potentially modulates root architectural responses to Zn in nodulated plants. As was also seen in Quercus suber L. seedlings by Disante et al. [10], exposure to High Zn resulted in increased root diameter in WT and raz plants compared to plants in Ideal Zn (Figure 2d). Raz plants in both treatments appear to have slightly greater root diameter compared to WT in respective treatments (Figure 2d). Root surface area and volume was greater in WT plants compared to raz plants in High Zn (Figure 2e,f).

Figure 1

Confocal images of M. truncatula raz and WT nodules at 7, 14, 21, and 28 dpi. Images at 7 dpi were obtained with a Leica TCS SP5 Inverted Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, Pa.). Images at 14, 21, and 28 dpi were collected using a Leica SP1 Inverted Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, Pa.). Green bars are 150 μm and red asterisks represent the stele of the root. SYTO 13, a green fluorescent nucleic acid specific stain was used to evaluate nodule development by tracking bacterial occupancy throughout the various transformations taking place during nodule formation. Some images are montages.

Figure 2

Root parameters of Medicago truncatula . Wild-type (grey columns) and raz (open columns) observed at 10 dpi using WinRhizo Pro. a) number of lateral roots, b) number of nodules, c) root length (cm), d) average root diameter (mm), e) root surface area (cm2), and f) root volume (cm3). Letter rankings indicate differences as determined by Tukey’s HSD at 95% confidence. Bars are standard error. * and † indicated trend evaluated at alpha = 0.1.

Nodulation may dramatically influence concentrations of root associated Zn in raz plants

Due to our inability to nodulate plants in the nutrient solutions used by Ellis et al. [3] (pZn = 5.7 (3 μM)) we switched to a modified 1/2x Lullien solution [47], which is widely used by the M. truncatula community, supplemented with 18 μM Zn (pZn = 7.55) which supplied significantly higher than normal Zn to the plant but didn’t inhibit nodule formation (Table 1). The “Ideal” treatment had 0.35 μM Zn (pZn ~9.85) which is close to pZn activities in the typical 1x Lullien solution (~9.9) (Table 1). Zn activities were much higher in all Zn treatments (save no Zn) in the studies of Ellis et al. [3] and Lopez-Millan et al. [48] than in a standard 1x Lullien. In the nutrient solutions used by Ellis et al. [3] and Lopez-Millan et al. [48] the lowest Zn concentration tested (save no Zn) was [Zn] = 0.2 μM, at which pZn activity is ~6.9; roughly 3 orders of magnitude greater Zn activity than the standard 1x and ½x Lullien solutions. Using these growth conditions (0.35 and 18 μM), we found greater root associated Zn in nodulated WT plants (>320 ppm d. wt.) compared to nodulated raz plants (>230 ppm d. wt.) in the High Zn treatment (Figure 3a). This finding is different than that found by Ellis et al. [3] and Lopez-Millan et al. [48] in non-nodulated plants, suggesting nodulation may affect Zn uptake and allocation in raz plants. While shoot associated Zn showed no difference between genotypes in either treatment, excess Zn resulted in a statistically significant increase in both genotypes compared to Ideal Zn (Figure 3b). Since the pZn activities in nutrient solutions used in our studies are different than those used by Ellis et al. [3] and Lopez-Millan et al. [48] it is difficult to compare the actual tissue associated concentrations, although our results for root and shoot Zn concentrations in WT plants are similar in magnitude to theirs. The High Zn treatment effectively reduced the Zn Translocation Factor (Tf(Zn) = [Znshoot/[Znroot) in both genotypes (Figure 4a), which is expected because plants are known to tolerate metal concentrations beyond their physiological requirements by sequestering the metals either in or on the roots, reducing translocation to the shoots [11]. Interestingly, raz plants had greater translocation of Zn to the shoots under both Zn conditions compared to WT (Figure 4a). Ellis et al. [3] and Lopez-Millan et al. [48] found raz plants had greater root tissue associated Zn and Mn levels than WT plants under various Zn-Mn regimes and that raz plants appear to take up more Mn with increasing Zn concentrations, with the exception of [Zn] = 0. As such we monitored Mn concentrations in our nodulated treatments. Nodulated raz plants in the High Zn condition had lower root associated Mn levels (>1,180 ppm d. wt.) than in the Ideal Zn condition (~2,400 ppm d. wt.), while there was no difference in root Mn concentration between treatments in the WT plants (Figure 3c). Shoot associated Mn showed no statistical differences with respect to genotype or treatment (Figure 3d). In this study, raz plants in Ideal Zn had a lower Tf(Mn) compared to WT plants in Ideal Zn (Figure 4b). The raz plants also had a lower Tf(Mn) compared to both plant genotypes in High Zn (Figure 4b). WT plants appear to show only a slightly greater Tf(Mn) in High Zn compared to Ideal Zn (alpha = 0.1) (Figure 4b). From these observations, it appears that Mn translocation is affected by Zn much more dramatically in raz plants and that the High Zn condition results in a Tf(Mn) similar to that of WT in Ideal and High Zn. Molybdenum is an important cofactor in the nitrogenase enzyme complex which is essential to N fixation in legumes, as such, tissue associated Mo was measured to ensure the nutritional status of the plant was adequate to support N-fixation in raz and WT plants. Surprisingly, we found shoot and root molybdenum levels (Figure 3e,f) well above 5 ppm, the “maximum tolerable concentration” determined for beef cattle [49] even at the low Mo activities (pMo activity ~6.5) used in this study which were similar to those used by Ellis et al. [3] and Lopez-Millan et al. [48]. As noted by Gupta [50], there is little research on Mo toxicity because it rarely occurs in plants and no definite legume toxicity concentration could be found in the literature by the authors of this work, however, similar levels of Mo have been observed in alfalfa grown in mine tailings [51]. Plants used in this study did not exhibit any signs of Mo toxicity as defined in the close relative M.sativa (i.e. yellowing and eventual bronzing of the leaves) [50]. No trends were noticed in shoot associated Mo with regards to treatment or genotype and there were no genotype or treatment effects found with regards to Tf(Mo) (Figure 4c). However, WT plants grown under excess Zn showed significantly more Mo associated with roots (>280 ppm d. wt.) compared to WT (>170 ppm d. wt.) and raz (>195 ppm d. wt., alpha = 0.1) plants under Ideal Zn (Figure 3e,f). Raz plants showed no statistical increase in root associated Mo concentrations with respect to High Zn, which may indicate an association between the raz mutation and Mo uptake in response to Zn. Previous researchers found no relationship between Zn and Mo levels associated with plant tissues of Trifolium pratense L [52], so the relationship we observed may not be universal to all plants.

Figure 3

Root and shoot tissue concentrations (ppm d. wt.) of Zn, Mn, and Mo at 24 dpi. Medicago truncatula wild-type (gray columns) and raz (open columns). a) is root Zn , b) is shoot Zn, c) is root Mn, d) is shoot Mn, e) is root Mo and f) is shoot Mo. Letter rankings indicate differences as determined by Tukey’s HSD at 95% confidence. Bars are standard error. * indicates trend evaluated at alpha = 0.1.

Figure 4

Translocation Factor (T f ) . Zn (a), Mn (b), and Mo (c) (Tf = [Metal shoot ]/[Metal root ]) at 24 dpi in Medicago truncatula wild-type (gray columns) and raz (open columns). Letter rankings indicate differences as determined by Tukey’s HSD at 95% confidence. * indicates alpha = 0.1 for this pairwise comparison. Bars are standard error.

qRT-PCR analysis shows mature miR166 is upregulated in response to Zn

Expression of miR166 was observed in WT and raz plants under Ideal and elevated Zn conditions at 10 dpi and 15 dpi (Figure 5). Three-factor ANOVA analysis of miR166 relative expression data revealed a significant treatment effect (p-value ~ 0.0001) and treatment x day effects (p-value ~ 0.017). Due to treatment x day interactions 2-factor ANOVA analyses were performed at each time point. Elevated Zn led to statistically significant upregulation of miR166 at 15 dpi in the roots of nodulated M. truncatula WT and raz compared to nodulated WT roots in Ideal conditions (Figure 5). While raz plants at 15 dpi in High Zn do not demonstrate a statistically significant upregulation compared to raz plants in Ideal Zn at this time point, there is no difference between genotypes, indicating little difference in miR166 Zn responses between raz and WT. At 10 dpi miR166 is not statistically upregulated under elevated Zn conditions, nonetheless, given that miR166 is downregulated in control plants at the 15 dpi time point, our results indicate that elevated Zn induces miR166 and leads to maintenance of higher miR166 expression over the observed time frame (10-15dpi).

Figure 5

Real-time RT-PCR analysis of miR166. M. truncatula WT (black and gray bars) and raz (white and striped bars). DPI is days post inoculation and bars are standard error. Expression is set relative to the average. Data is normalized to actin-11.

qRT-PCR analysis shows mature miR169 is downregulated at the 15 dpi time point

Expression levels of miR169 did not show any statistically significant trend in response to Zn in WT or raz plants at either time point (Figure 6). However, 3-way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant day effect. At 15 dpi, miR169 expression was downregulated with respect to 10 dpi at α = 0.05. Whole root tissue was used for both time points and our results imply that miR169 is downregulated at the 15 dpi time point in both plant genotypes under both Zn treatments. This result is complementary to the findings of Combier et al. [37] where the precursor, MtMIR169a, was downregulated at 14 dpi compared to 10 dpi in nodulated roots.

Figure 6

Real-time RT-PCR analysis of miR169. M. truncatula WT (black and gray bars) and raz (white and striped bars). DPI is days post inoculation and bars are standard error. Expression is set relative to the average. Data is normalized to actin-11.


Exposure of WT and raz to excess zinc resulted in many differences in root system architecture between the two genotypes. Interestingly, differences in lateral root number were evident between genotypes but no difference was noticed in nodule number or development; implying that while the raz mutation does inhibit lateral root formation it does not inhibit the closely related process of nodulation. Ibekwe et al. [8] found high Zn activities delayed or inhibited nodulation in Medicago sativa inoculated with S. meliloti, but did not inhibit N-fixation in developed nodules. Conversely, Zn deficiency has been shown to disturb symbiotic N-fixation by altering other processes within the host plant, such as nutrient transport and assimilation [53]. Expression of a Krüppel-like zinc finger protein is integral to the formation of the N-fixation zone in M. truncatula[54]. In these ways, Zn plays a significant role in nodule development. In our study, the process of nodulation was unaffected by the Zn treatment in both genotypes.

Ellis et al. [3] found Zn tissue concentrations in non-nodulated M. truncatula WT and raz to be dependent upon Mn concentrations and vice versa, with raz exhibiting greater sensitivity to variations in concentration of either nutrient. For instance, at 3 μM Zn and 2 μM Mn, raz plants had root Zn levels >10,000 μg g-1 d. wt. compared with raz at 3 μM Zn and 0.2 μM Mn which had <4,000 μg g-1 d. wt. In contrast, WT plants showed little difference in root Zn levels in either of these treatments. Also, raz had greater root Mn levels at 3 μM Zn and 2 μM Mn (~3,000 μg g-1 d. wt.) and 0 μM Zn and 2 μM Mn (>4,000 μg g-1 d. wt.) compared with 1 μM Zn and 2 μM Mn (<2,000 μg g-1 d. wt. ). Under these and several other Zn:Mn ratios raz plants had greater root Zn and Mn concentrations than WT plants. Using the same nutrient solution with Zn and Mn concentrations (3 μM Zn and 0.2 μM Mn and pH 5.5) that Ellis et al. [3] showed to be ideal for raz in non-nodulated treatments, we made several unsuccessful attempts to nodulate WT and raz plants. To evaluate why the plants weren’t nodulating, we used GeoChem EZ to model the nutrient solutions used by Ellis et al. [3] and found the pZn activity to be around 5.7 at pH 5.5. Ibekwe et al. [8] showed that yellowing and necrosis in young leaves of M. sativa occurred at a pZn activity = 8, 5.25, and 5.0, with plant health improving after 10 days of treatment at pZn activity = 8. However, at pZn activity = 5.25 and 5.0 they found overall plant growth was stunted and no nodulation was achieved. Lack of nodulation was attributed to damaged root tissue. Ibekwe et al. [8] were examining the interaction of Cd/ Zn toxicity on M. sativa and S. meliloti, but the Zn studies were carried out at a Cd activity that was found to not influence the growth or nodulation of the plants or rhizobia. There is little research on the influence of metal concentrations on nodulation in M. truncatula so it is possible that the response to heavy metals may be slightly different than that of M. sativa. Regardless, we have shown some agreement with the influence of Zn on nodulation between the species.

Nodulation appears to alter the relationship between Zn and Mn uptake and allocation in M. truncatula compared to non-nodulated experiments shown in previous studies [3, 48]. This relationship seems to be altered more dramatically in the raz mutant, where a greater proportion of Zn was allocated to the shoots in both High and Ideal Zn compared with WT and where a greater proportion of Mn remained associated with the roots in Ideal Zn (Figure 4xa, b). In our study, WT and raz plants had significantly higher levels of Zn in root and shoot tissues in the High Zn treatment compared to Ideal conditions (Figure 3a, b). Ellis et al. (2003) reported greater Zn concentration in roots verses shoots and elevated Zn conditions are known to influence metal distribution in the plant by inhibiting translocation of Zn to the shoots leading to Zn accumulation in the roots (Rout and Das 2003). Interestingly, WT plants had significantly more Zn associated with root tissues compared to raz under High Zn conditions. This finding is contrary to the results of Ellis et al. (2003) and Lopez-Millan et al. (2005) in non-nodulated plants, suggesting nodulation affects Zn uptake and distribution in raz plants. Since the pZn activities in nutrient solutions used in our studies are different than those used by Ellis et al. (2003) and Lopez-Millan et al. (2005) it is difficult to compare the actual tissue concentrations, though our results for root and shoot Zn concentrations in WT plants do fall roughly in the range that one may expect based on their results. Perhaps the lower levels of Zn in the roots is an artifact of the excess Zn being shuttled to the shoots (TfZn is higher in raz). It could also be related to the smaller size of raz roots given that surface area and volume are lower in this genotype. We also observed greater uptake of Mn by raz roots exposed to Ideal Zn versus High Zn (Figure 3c). Ellis et al. (2003) and Lopez-Millan et al. (2005) found raz plants had greater root tissue associated Zn and Mn levels than WT plants under various Zn-Mn regimes and that raz plants tend to take up more Mn with increasing Zn concentrations, with the exception of [Zn] = 0. These results again point to a possible influence of nodulation on the partitioning of metals within the plant and warrants further experimentation to deduce the mechanisms underlying this dramatic, possibly nodulation induced, change in Mn (and Zn) uptake by raz mutants.

There is much to learn concerning the nutrient demands generated by nodulation or the fluxes in nutrient uptake and allocation possibly associated with the formation and maintenance of nodules, as well as symbiosis as a whole. The potential nodulation-related changes we observed in Zn and Mn uptake in M. truncatula may be indicative of nutritional adjustments necessary to properly form and maintain the symbiosis. Previous studies in non-nodulated plants have found no correlation between MnSOD and total Mn associated with plant tissues of either genotype, however, a strong correlation was found between tissue associated Zn and ZnSOD [55]. The authors found ZnSOD levels were lower in raz plants exposed to high Zn compared with WT in the same treatment and compared with both genotypes in lower Zn, indicating that Zn is less available in raz roots past a certain threshold. Concentrations of root associated Mo were increased in response to Zn in WT but not raz. This may be indicative of differences in the plant genotypic responses to excess Zn. If raz plants are less sensitive to high levels of Zn, then the Zn tolerance mechanisms, such as the release of metal sequestering compounds into the rhizosphere, would be induced to a lesser extent compared with WT, thereby leading to lower levels of root associated Mo. However, since previous researchers have found no such association in other species and no work has been done regarding this type of interaction in Medicago species, this warrants further study.

As discussed earlier, excess Zn is known to affect several developmental parameters (i.e. increased root diameter, inhibition of root elongation, and inhibition of hypocotyl and coleoptile growth). Given that miR166 is thought to play roles in root cell identity [33], our findings, even though we are unable to determine which miR166 family member(s) is/are the source of the mature miRNA, may allude to part of the genetic mechanism by which Zn inhibits cell division. It is not uncommon for researchers to report increases in root diameter along with decreases in root elongation [5659]. It is also thought that decreases in root elongation can potentially arise from decreases in cell division [59], understandably, given the intimate connection between the two processes [58]. Boualem et al. (2008) showed that MtMIR166a is involved in nodule development as well as root architecture in nodulated and non-nodulated M. truncatula. They showed a progressive trend in downregulation of MtMIR166a in nodules of M. truncatula moving from 1, 3, 8, and 21 dpi, with the 21 dpi point showing significant downregulation. Here, we are reporting two time points within this range and have found a similar trend in mature miR166 expression; downregulation from whole nodulated roots in Ideal Zn. Boualem et al. [34], also showed that overexpression of miR166 in M. truncatula via 2x35S promotion leads to a decrease in nodule number and lateral root formation accompanied by dramatic reordering of vascular bundling patterns. We did not investigate vascular bundling patterns, but we found no experimental effect on nodule number and no treatment effect on lateral root number (Figure 2a). We did note a genotypic difference in lateral root number, where WT plants generated significantly more lateral roots than raz plants (Figure 2a); the same phenomenon was observed in lateral root density (Additional file 3: Figure S2). Boualem et al. [34] examined the effects of overexpressing miR166 through strong promotion and our study was constructed to analyze the behavior of miR166 in response to Zn in non-transgenic plants. The upregulation we witnessed is likely inadequate to reproduce the drastic changes in phenotype observed by Boualem et al. [34] and is potentially indicative of other, more subtle, roles of miR166 in Zn response. The suggested role of miR166 directed regulation of HD-ZIP III transcription factors in vascular bundling and patterning insinuates Zn induction of miR166 is possibly related to changes in root vascular structure necessary to withstand, or induced by, the elevated Zn condition.

Investigation into the functions of miRNAs in plants is rapidly evolving, revealing their roles in a multitude of biological processes from basic development to abiotic stress response via long distance phloem transport. Here we have shown that miR166 is upregulated in response to chronic Zn exposure in nodulated M. truncatula WT and raz. The effect of Zn on miR166 is statistically significant at the 15 dpi sample point. Given that Zn exposure did not generate phenotypes similar to those with 2x35S:MtMIR166a overexpression [34], our results may imply a previously unidentified role for miR166 in Zn response. WT plants developed significantly more lateral roots than raz plants while miR166 expression was very similar across genotypes. Differences in lateral root formation were not associated with Zn treatment, yet upregulation of miR166 was. We found no relationship between Zn exposure and expression of miR169. We also found no difference in expression of miR169 between genotypes. Complimentary to other experiments monitoring expression of the precursor, MtMIR169a, we found mature miR169 to be downregulated at the 15 dpi point compared to the 10 dpi point [37]. Suggesting that expression of mature miR169 in whole nodule containing root tissues may mimic what has previously been observed in root nodules. However, we observed no difference in nodule formation in response to Zn or between genotypes and given miR169 expression is related to nodule development and function by limiting the expression of MtHAP2-1to the meristematic region [37] it is unlikely that examination of nodule tissue only would show any meaningful trends.


In summary, nodule development appears to be unaffected by the raz mutation, suggesting the alteration in Zn partitioning induced by the mutation is of little consequence concerning this process. Excess Zn also appears to have little influence on nodule development or number in M. truncatula, as has been observed in M. sativa. The major root architectural Zn responses observed in this study were amongst genotypes, indicating the raz mutation modifies root development in relation to WT plants and that this modification alters phenotypic responses to Zn. We have provided evidence that nodulation may alter the relationship between Zn and Mn concentrations associated with root and shoot tissues and possibly hinder the Zn accumulating abilities previously characterized in raz. MiR166 is induced in roots of M. truncatula WT and raz in response to Zn and this appears to be maintained through time under chronic Zn exposure. Given the proposed mechanism by which miR166 is thought to regulate, at least partially, root cell identity; our results may imply some part of the mechanism by which excess Zn inhibits cell division. Further studies should investigate the role that miR166 plays in Zn responses to determine the precise function of this miRNA in chronic Zn exposure. The findings we report here provide insight into how legume roots respond to Zn and add to previous research which also found moderately high Zn levels to have little effect on nodule development, provided Zn concentrations were beneath the threshold where nodulation is drastically inhibited. Future research should focus on the nutritional demands that nodule development places upon legumes and how this may alter nutrient fluxes within the plant. Investigation into the roles of miRNA in Zn stress may also prove fruitful in attempts to further understand genetic mechanisms governing Zn induced phenotypic responses.



Requires additional zinc


Wild type


Root system architecture




  1. 1.

    Cook DR: Medicago truncatula – a model in the making!: Commentary. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999, 2 (4): 301-304. 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80053-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rose RJ: Medicago truncatula as a model for understanding plant interactions with other organisms, plant development and stress biology: past, present and future. Funct Plant Biol. 2008, 35 (4): 253-264. 10.1071/FP07297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ellis DR, Lopez-Millan AF, Grusak MA: Metal physiology and accumulation in a Medicago truncatula mutant exhibiting an elevated requirement for zinc. New Phytol. 2003, 158 (1): 207-218. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00706.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kulikova O, Gualtieri G, Geurts R, Kim DJ, Cook D, Huguet T, de Jong JH, Fransz PF, Bisseling T: Integration of the FISH pachytene and genetic maps of Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2001, 27 (1): 49-58. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01057.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Munzuroglu O, Geckil H: Effects of Metals on Seed Germination, Root Elongation, and Coleoptile and Hypocotyl Growth in Triticum aestivum and Cucumis sativus. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002, 43 (2): 203-213. 10.1007/s00244-002-1116-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Godbold DL, Hüttermann A: Effect of zinc, cadmium and mercury on root elongation of Picea abies (Karst.) seedlings, and the significance of these metals to forest die-back. Environ Pollut Ecol Biol. 1985, 38 (4): 375-381. 10.1016/0143-1471(85)90108-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wong MH, Bradshaw AD: A Comparison of the Toxicity of Heavy Metals, Using Root Elongation of Rye Grass, Lolium Perenne. New Phytol. 1982, 91 (2): 255-261. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03310.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ibekwe AM, Angle JS, Chaney RL, VanBerkum P: Zinc and cadmium toxicity to alfalfa and its microsymbiont. J Environ Qual. 1996, 25 (5)): 1032-1040.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Robb J, Busch L, Rauser WE: Zinc Toxicity and Xylem Vessel Wall Alterations in White Beans. Ann Bot. 1980, 46 (1): 43-50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Disante KB, Fuentes D, Cortina J: Response to drought of Zn-stressed Quercus suber L. seedlings. Environ Exp Bot. 2011, 70 (2–3): 96-103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rout GR, Das P: Effect of metal toxicity on plant growth and metabolism: I. Zinc. Agronomie. 2003, 23 (1): 3-11. 10.1051/agro:2002073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Allen E, Xie ZX, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC: microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005, 121 (2): 207-221. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bari R, Pant BD, Stitt M, Scheible WR: PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141 (3): 988-999. 10.1104/pp.106.079707.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP: Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol Cell. 2004, 14 (6): 787-799. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu PP, Montgomery TA, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Nonogaki H, Carrington JC: Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J. 2007, 52 (1): 133-146. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03218.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lu SF, Sun YH, Shi R, Clark C, Li LG, Chiang VL: Novel and mechanical stress-responsive microRNAs in Populus trichocarpa that are absent from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005, 17 (8): 2186-2203. 10.1105/tpc.105.033456.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, Arnold B, Dharmasiri N, Estelle M, Voinnet O, Jones JDG: A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science. 2006, 312 (5772): 436-439. 10.1126/science.1126088.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible WR: MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J. 2008, 53 (5): 731-738. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Reyes JL, Chua NH: ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 2007, 49 (4): 592-606. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02980.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sunkar R, Kapoor A, Zhu JK: Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance. Plant Cell. 2006, 18 (8): 2051-2065. 10.1105/tpc.106.041673.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sunkar R, Zhu JK: Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004, 16 (8): 2001-2019. 10.1105/tpc.104.022830.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang Z, Wei L, Zou X, Tao Y, Liu Z, Zheng Y: Submergence-responsive MicroRNAs are Potentially Involved in the Regulation of Morphological and Metabolic Adaptations in Maize Root Cells. Ann Bot. 2008, 102 (4): 509-519. 10.1093/aob/mcn129.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhao BT, Liang RQ, Ge LF, Li W, Xiao HS, Lin HX, Ruan KC, Jin YX: Identification of drought-induced microRNAs in rice. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2007, 354 (2): 585-590. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.022.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lewis RW, Mendu V, McNear DH, Tang G: Roles of MicroRNAs in Plant Abiotic Stress. Molecular Techniques in Crop Improvement. Edited by: Jain SM, Brar DS. 2009, Netherlands: Springer, 357-372.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    He L, Hannon GJ: Micrornas: Small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004, 5 (7): 522-531. 10.1038/nrg1379.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chiou TJ: The role of microRNAs in sensing nutrient stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30 (3): 323-332. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01643.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yamasaki H, Abdel-Ghany SE, Cohu CM, Kobayashi Y, Shikanai T, Pilon M: Regulation of copper homeostasis by micro-RNA in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (22): 16369-16378. 10.1074/jbc.M700138200.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kim J, Jung JH, Reyes JL, Kim YS, Kim SY, Chung KS, Kim JA, Lee M, Lee Y, Narry Kim V, et al: microRNA-directed cleavage of ATHB15 mRNA regulates vascular development in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems. Plant J. 2005, 42 (1): 84-94. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02354.x.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jung J-H, Park C-M: MIR166/165 genes exhibit dynamic expression patterns in regulating shoot apical meristem and floral development in Arabidopsis. Planta. 2007, 225 (6): 1327-1338. 10.1007/s00425-006-0439-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    McConnell JR, Emery J, Eshed Y, Bao N, Bowman J, Barton MK: Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature. 2001, 411 (6838): 709-713. 10.1038/35079635.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Emery JF, Floyd SK, Alvarez J, Eshed Y, Hawker NP, Izhaki A, Baum SF, Bowman JL: Radial Patterning of Arabidopsis Shoots by Class III HD-ZIP and KANADI Genes. Current biology: CB. 2003, 13 (20): 1768-1774. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.035.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Otsuga D, DeGuzman B, Prigge MJ, Drews GN, Clark SE: REVOLUTA regulates meristem initiation at lateral positions. Plant J. 2001, 25 (2): 223-236. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00959.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Carlsbecker A, Lee JY, Roberts CJ, Dettmer J, Lehesranta S, Zhou J, Lindgren O, Moreno-Risueno MA, Vaten A, Thitamadee S, et al: Cell signalling by microRNA165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature. 2010, 465 (7296): 316-321. 10.1038/nature08977.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Boualem A, Laporte P, Jovanovic M, Laffont C, Plet J, Combier JP, Niebel A, Crespi M, Frugier F: MicroRNA166 controls root and nodule development in Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2008, 54 (5): 876-887. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03448.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Li W-X, Oono Y, Zhu J, He X-J, Wu J-M, Iida K, Lu X-Y, Cui X, Jin H, Zhu J-K: The Arabidopsis NFYA5 Transcription Factor Is Regulated Transcriptionally and Posttranscriptionally to Promote Drought Resistance. Plant Cell. 2008, 20 (8): 2238-2251. 10.1105/tpc.108.059444.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pant BD, Musialak-Lange M, Nuc P, May P, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Walther D, Scheible W-R: Identification of Nutrient-Responsive Arabidopsis and Rapeseed MicroRNAs by Comprehensive Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Profiling and Small RNA Sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150 (3): 1541-1555. 10.1104/pp.109.139139.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Combier JP, Frugier F, de Billy F, Boualem A, El-Yahyaoui F, Moreau S, Vernie T, Ott T, Gamas P, Crespi M, et al: MtHAP2-1 is a key transcriptional regulator of symbiotic nodule development regulated by microRNA169 in Medicago truncatula. Gene Dev. 2006, 20 (22): 3084-3088. 10.1101/gad.402806.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Beveridge CA, Mathesius U, Rose RJ, Gresshoff PM: Common regulatory themes in meristem development and whole-plant homeostasis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007, 10 (1): 44-51. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.11.011.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Complainville A, Brocard L, Roberts I, Dax E, Sever N, Sauer N, Kondorosi A, Wolf S, Oparka K, Crespi M: Nodule Initiation Involves the Creation of a New Symplasmic Field in Specific Root Cells of Medicago Species. Plant Cell. 2003, 15 (12): 2778-2791. 10.1105/tpc.017020.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Simon SA, Meyers BC, Sherrier DJ: MicroRNAs in the Rhizobia Legume Symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151 (3): 1002-1008. 10.1104/pp.109.144345.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shaff JE, Schultz BA, Craft EJ, Clark RT, Kochian LV: GEOCHEM-EZ: a chemical speciation program with greater power and flexibility. Plant Soil. 2010, 330 (1–2): 207-214.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Barker DGT, Pfaff D, Moreau E, Groves S, Ruffel M, Lepetit S, Whiteh F, Maillet RM, Nair Journet E: Growing M. truncatula: choice of substrates and growth conditions. The Medicago truncatula handbook. Edited by: Mathesius UJE, Sumner LW. 2006,,

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Varkonyi-Gasic E, Wu RM, Wood M, Walton EF, Hellens RP: Protocol: a highly sensitive RT-PCR method for detection and quantification of microRNAs. Plant Methods. 2007, 3 (12): 10.1186/1746-4811-1183-1112.

  44. 44.

    Chen CF, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou ZH, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, et al: Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (20): e179-110.1093/nar/gni1178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kalendar R, Lee D, Schulman AH: FastPCR Software for PCR Primer and Probe Desgin and Repeat Search. Genes, Genomes and Genomics. 2009, 3 (1):,

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Haynes JG, Czymmek KJ, Carlson CA, Veereshlingam H, Dickstein R, Sherrier DJ: Rapid analysis of legume root nodule development using confocal microscopy. New Phytol. 2004, 163 (3): 661-668. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01138.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lullien V, Barker DG, Delajudie P, Huguet T: Plant Gene-Expression in Effective and Ineffective Root-Nodules of Alfalfa (Medicago-Sativa). Plant Mol Biol. 1987, 9 (5): 469-478. 10.1007/BF00015878.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lopez-Millan AF, Ellis DR, Grusak MA: Effect of zinc and manganese supply on the activities of superoxide dismutase and carbonic anhydrase in Medicago truncatula wild type and raz mutant plants. Plant Sci. 2005, 168 (4): 1015-1022. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.11.018.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    NRC NRC: Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 1996, Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Deficient, Sufficient and Toxic Concentrations of Molybdenum in Crops. Edited by: Gupta UC. 1997, New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Majak W, Steinke D, McGillivray J, Lysyk T: Clinical signs in cattle grazing high molybdenum forage. J Range Manage. 2004, 57 (3): 269-274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    McBride MB, Richards BK, Steenhuis T, Spiers G: Molybdenum Uptake by Forage Crops Grown on Sewage Sludge-Amended Soils in the Field and Greenhouse. J Environ Qual. 2000, 29 (3): 848-854.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ohara GW, Boonkerd N, Dilworth MJ: Mineral Constraints to Nitrogen-Fixation. Plant Soil. 1988, 108 (1): 93-110. 10.1007/BF02370104.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Frugier F, Poirier S, Satiat-Jeunemaitre B, Kondorosi A, Crespi M: A Kruppel-like zinc finger protein is involved in nitrogen-fixing root nodule organogenesis. Gene Dev. 2000, 14 (4): 475-482.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    López-Millán AF, Ellis DR, Grusak MA: Effect of zinc and manganese supply on the activities of superoxide dismutase and carbonic anhydrase in Medicago truncatula wild type and raz mutant plants. Plant Sci. 2005, 168 (4): 1015-1022. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.11.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Vaughan D, Ord B: Influence of phenolic acids on morphological changes in roots of Pisum sativum. J Sci Food Agric. 1990, 52 (3): 289-299. 10.1002/jsfa.2740520302.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Römheld V, Marschner H: Iron deficiency stress induced morphological and physiological changes in root tips of sunflower. Physiol Plant. 1981, 53 (3): 354-360. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb04512.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Inada S, Tominaga M, Shimmen T: Regulation of Root Growth by Gibberellin in Lemna minor. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41 (6): 657-665. 10.1093/pcp/41.6.657.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Baskin TI, Wilson JE: Inhibitors of Protein Kinases and Phosphatases Alter Root Morphology and Disorganize Cortical Microtubules. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113 (2): 493-502. 10.1104/pp.113.2.493.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We appreciate seed gifts from Michael Grusak, Hongyan Zhu, and Troy Bass. Sinorhizobium meliloti stock was provided by Janine Sherrier, for which we are very grateful. We thank Olga Tsyusko, Mohammad Babar Ali, Xiaoyun Jia, Ligang Ren and B. Usha for advice on qRT-PCR and general RNA/miRNA methodology, and Jason Unrine for metals analysis via ICP-MS. We also thank Maria Labreveux and Xia Yu for assistance with statistical analysis, and Joseph V. Kupper and Rebecca Sims for assistance with general lab work.

This work was funded by the University of Kentucky Department of Plant and Soil Science.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H McNear Jr.

Additional information

Competing interests

There are no competing interests associated with this work.

Authors’ contributions

RL is the primary author of the manuscript and conducted all experiments appearing in it, with the exception of metal concentration analysis via ICP-MS. GT aided in the conception of the study, development of the RNA methodology, and interpretation of the data. DM aided in the conception of the study, experimental design, interpretation of the data, and contributed greatly to revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Figure S1.

Additional file 1: Images of the modified General Hyrdoponics Rainforest 236 aeroponic system. Ranforest 236 system as purchased, b) bacteria friendly vortex pump used to circulate and aerate the nutrient solution (ruler is 16”), c) addition of 125 micron polypropylene mesh connected by Velcro™ to the top cover of the Rainforest system to reduced the size of the nutrient solution to a fine mist, d) top loading acrylic panel insert with 5/16” holes drilled every inch to accommodate ~35 plantlets, and e) an operating RainforestTM 236 with single grow panel lifted to reveal roots, nutrient solution and mist screen. (JPEG 396 KB)

Additional file 2:Table S1. Forward (FWD) and reverse (REV) primer concentrations and efficiencies used in qRT-PCR. Primer concentrations found to provide the most efficient amplification and the calculated efficiencies. (JPEG 109 KB)

Figure S2.

Additional file 3: Lateral root density (# of lateral roots/cm) of Medicago truncatula. Wild-type (grey columns) and raz (open columns) observed at 10 dpi using WinRhizo Pro. Letter rankings indicate differences as determined by Tukey’s HSD at 95% confidence. Bars are standard error. Ideal Zn = 0.35 μM (pZn activity ~9.85 with N and ~9.84 without N) and High Zn = 18 μM (pZn activity ~7.55 with and without N as calculated by GeoChem-EZ). (JPEG 219 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, R.W., Tang, G. & McNear, D.H. Morphological and genetic changes induced by excess Zn in roots of Medicago truncatula A17 and a Zn accumulating mutant. BMC Res Notes 5, 657 (2012).

Download citation


  • Medicago truncatula
  • Abiotic stress
  • MicroRNA (miRNA)
  • Zn stress
  • Translocation factor
  • Legume
  • Root architecture