Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Prevalence of national treatment algorithm defined smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV positive patients in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo



In the Republic in Congo, the national algorithm for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) relies on Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) sputum smear microscopy, chest X-ray radiography (CXR) and clinical symptoms. Microscopy positive pulmonary TB (MPT+) is defined as symptoms of TB and a positive ZN smear. Microscopy negative pulmonary TB (MPT-) is defined as symptoms of TB, a negative ZN smear but CXR changes consistent with TB. The present cross-sectional study was designed to determine the prevalence of positive and negative MPT individuals among HIV positive and HIV negative individuals presenting to an ambulatory TB treatment center (CTA) in Brazzaville.


All study participants underwent a physical examination, chest radiography and three ZN sputum smear examinations and HIV testing. Viral load and CD4 counts were determined for HIV positive individuals.


775 individuals presented with symptoms of TB. 425 individuals accepted the voluntary HIV test. 133 (31.3%) were HIV positive (HIV+) and 292 (68.7%) were HIV negative (HIV-). Of the 292 HIV- individuals 167 (57%) were classified as positive MPT and 125 (43%) as negative MPT. Of the 133 HIV positive individuals 39 (29%) were classified as MPT + and 94 (71%) as MPT-.


Our study shows that the prevalence of positive MPT individuals is lower among HIV positive individuals compared to HIV negative individuals in agreement to reports from other countries. The data suggest that a substantial number of HIV positive pulmonary TB cases are not detected by the national algorithm and highlight the need for new diagnostic tests in this population.


There are approximately 34 million people currently living with HIV, one-third of these is estimated to also be infected with tuberculosis (TB) [13]. Although antiretrovirals (ARV) can reduce the risk of death in HIV infected individuals, an untreated TB patient starting this therapy might be exposed to immune-reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) which is associated with increased morbidity and potential mortality [4].

In sub-Saharan Africa, TB is often the first manifestation of HIV infection, and it is the leading cause of death among HIV infected patients [57]. The countries of the world with the highest HIV prevalence rates are also those with high rates of TB [8], these countries include: Swaziland, Botswana, Lesotho, and South Africa [1, 9]. The highest number of TB/HIV co-infection has been reported in southern Africa, where more than 60% of TB patients are HIV positive [5, 6, 10]. The burden of TB and TB-HIV co-infection is no less alarming in the Republic of Congo. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011, the incidence of TB in Republic of Congo was 473 per 100,000 population (including TB/HIV co-infections) and 31% of TB patients were HIV positive [11].

The diagnosis of HIV-associated TB is often challenging and nucleic acid amplification tests, including the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and urinary LAM assays are known to improve the diagnosis of both smear-negative and extrapulmonary TB in HIV positive individuals [12].

TB diagnosis worldwide currently heavily relies on sputum smear microscopy to detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB), as it is rapid, inexpensive, and highly specific for identifying active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) [13, 14]. This technique is known to identify the most cases with excellent specificity, but has an approximate sensitivity of 35% to 70% [1518]. Indeed, a particular challenge for clinicians is the rising incidence of HIV related TB, often associated with an increase in smear negative microscopy cases [1922] Unfortunately, the most sensitive techniques available such as mycobacterial culture and nucleic acid amplification techniques, are expensive, resource intensive and thus not routinely available in many African countries [2327]. Current culture-based methods takes more than two weeks [28] and there is a need for faster diagnosis of TB in HIV- and HIV + patients as well as delays in diagnosis and treatment are associated with high mortality risk [2932].In the Republic of Congo, the current national guidelines for TB diagnosis relies on sputum smear microscopy, X-ray radiography and clinical symptoms to confirm TB cases (Figure 1). The present study is designed as a diagnostic cross sectional study of HIV + and HIV - patients suspected of having pulmonary TB. We aimed to demonstrate the utility of the national diagnosis algorithm in confirming pulmonary TB in HIV + and HIV -individuals. In addition we assessed virologic and immunologic parameters in the HIV positive individuals. More specifically, we seek to evaluate the need to implement new diagnostic tools to increase the detection rate of TB in HIV+/sputum smear-negative cases.

Figure 1
figure 1

National algorithm for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB.


Selection of patients

The study participants were recruited at the anti-tuberculosis center (CAT) of Brazzaville during the study period from February to June 2011. All consecutive TB suspects regardless of HIV status were eligible for the study. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants or their guardians. Ethical authorization was obtained from the Comité d’éthique Institutionnel de la Recherche en Santé (CERSSA) (No. 00000067/DGRST/CERSSA).

Specimen collection

Demographic data (age, place of residence) and clinical data were recorded for all participants during a medical interview and a physical examination by a clinician. Chest radiography and sputum collection was performed according to the national diagnostic algorithm. Participants provided three sputum specimens over the course of 2 days. The first specimen was collected when the patient attended the CAT for the first time. A container was given to the participant for collecting an early morning sample at home the next day, and a third was collected again at the center when the patient brought back the early morning specimen. The samples were tested with the direct Ziehl-Neelsen light microscopy method following standard instructions on proper sputum submission. Sputum microscopy was performed at the onsite laboratory, with density of acid fast bacilli graded as 1, 2 or 3 + .

HIV testing

Blood samples were tested using two rapid tests, Determine HIV 1/2 test (Alere GmbH, Koln, Germany) and ImmunoComb II HIV 1 & 2 BiSpot (Orgenics, Yavne, Israel). In case of discordance between these two tests, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Vironostika®HIV-1 Plus O Microelisa System, UK) was performed by the reference lab which is the Laboratoire National de Santé Publique.

CD4+/CD8+ cells counts

Approximately 5 ml of blood was collected in an EDTA tube for counting T cells. The blood samples were processed immediately within 2 hours of collection, for determination of the absolute counts of CD4+, CD8+ cells by activated cell sorting (FACS) count (Partec GmbH, Munster, Germany), following manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantification of plasma viral load

Quantification of plasma viral load of HIV-1 was done using Biocentric™ kit, on a platform of Roche LightCycler ® 480 using the technique of real-time PCR. A volume of 10 ml obtained after RNA extraction from plasma was used for analysis. The detection limit was 1,500 viral RNA copies / ml (2.3 log copies / ml). The determination of viral load was performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the Faculty of Health Sciences /University Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville.

National diagnosis algorithm (Figure 1)

At the first consultation, all patients suspected of TB were clinically assessed by a trained health professional. The assessment includes screening for clinical signs and symptoms such as current cough (if self-reported cough was > 2 weeks), fever, night sweats and weight loss. Sputum samples were collected and examined using Ziehl-Neelsen staining microscopy. A chest X-ray was performed and HIV testing was offered to all individuals.

Case definitions

Pulmonary TB (PTB) positive microscopy: Patients with at least 2 positive sputum samples were classified as positive for pulmonary TB. These PTB positive patients were given the standard anti-TB treatment according to National guidelines.

Pulmonary TB negative microscopy: Patients with at least 2 sputum samples negative for AFB and with symptoms of TB, a negative ZN smear but CXR changes consistent with TB were classified as negative for pulmonary TB. These PTB negative patients were treated with a full course of anti-TB chemotherapy if 15 days later the screening is positive.

Patients without pulmonary TB: Individuals with negative sputum samples for AFB and no X-ray changes suggestive of TB.

Statistical analysis

The demographic, clinical and laboratory results were entered into a database and analyzed using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The mean and standard deviation of the age, CD4 and CD8 T cells and viral load were calculated using student’s t-test for comparison. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of age, gender and clinical parameters on HIV infection. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the proportion of HIV infected patients with different levels of CD4+, CD8+ T cells and viral load between AFB positive and negative microscopy. Differences were considered statistically significant when the p value was ≤ 0.05.


Characteristic of patients who consented to the HIV test

From February to June 2011, 775 patients attending the consultation service at the TB center of Brazzaville (CAT) were deemed suspected TB cases based on clinical examination (Figure 2). Of these, 425 (54.8%) underwent HIV testing at the time of TB diagnosis specimen collection. Among these, 133 (31.3%) were HIV + and 292 were HIV-.

Figure 2
figure 2

Sputum smear microscopy, HIV test and chest X-Ray results for the study participants. + means Patients with smear positive or smear negative microscopy CXR means Chest X-ray.

As presented on Table 1, the mean age of all participants was 34.9 years ±13.01 and most of the patients were older than 25 years. Gender, signs of TB, axillary temperature did not significantly differ according to HIV status.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients (who accepted to do the HIV test) enrolled at the TB Center in Brazzaville

Of the 292 HIV- individuals, 167 (57%) were classified as PTM positive and 125 (43%) as PTM negative. Of the 133 HIV + individuals 39 (29.3%) were classified as PTM positive and 94 (70.7%) as PTM negative (Table 2 and Figure 2). Thirty-six (92.3%) and thirty-five (37.2%) AFB positive and negative patients respectively, were positive for X-ray (Figure 2) (<0.001).

Table 2 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells counts in HIV Congolese patients with positive or negative sputum detected by microscopy using Ziehl-Neelsen staining

CD4+/CD8+ T cells, viral load and sputum microscopy examination in HIV patients

Concerning the 133 HIV patients, CD4+ T cells counts have been reported according to the results of sputum microscopy examination in Table 2. Overall mean baseline CD4+ and CD8+ T cell count was 289.4 and 850.9 cells/ml respectively (Table 2). HIV + patients with positive AFB had higher CD4+ counts (385.4 ± 278.1 cells/ml) when compared to those with a negative AFB (239.6 ± 274.9 cells/ml) (p < 0.029). Patients with CD4 cell counts below 350 cells/mm3 were significantly higher among negative AFB patients (p < 0.007). The mean CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly higher in positive smear pulmonary tuberculosis than negative smear (0.59 versus 0.25, P < 0.003).

The mean viral load was similar in AFB positive and AFB negative groups and no significant difference between those with positive and negative AFB (Table 3) was found.

Table 3 Viral load in HIV Congolese patients with sputum smear positive or negative by microscopy stained using Ziehl-Neelsen staining


The burden of TB around the world remains alarming. Microscopy examination of sputum samples is recommended by the WHO as an essential step for patients suspected of pulmonary TB. Unfortunately, smear microscopy has been reported to have low sensitivity [33]. In particular, this technique has limited performance in immune-compromised individuals [34]. A number of studies report that pulmonary TB diagnosis can be achieved through the combination of clinical symptoms, CXR-examinations and smear microscopy [3537].

As in many countries with limited resources where TB is endemic, the algorithm endorsed by the Congolese national TB control program emphasizes the use of these modalities. In our study, we found that this algorithm identifies less cases of PTB microscopy positive and PTB microscopy negative in HIV + individuals compared to HIV – individuals. It is important to keep in mind that mycobacterial culture or nucleic acid amplification tests are not available in our setting. This is a common limitation encountered in African countries. The true prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis in our setting is thus not determined.

Our study showed that the rate of ZN smear positivity is higher in HIV - than in HIV + individuals. Given the well-known increased risk for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV + individuals the data suggest that a number of HIV + individuals with pulmonary TB were not detected by ZN based microscopy [3, 6, 9]. Moreover the lower prevalence of CXR abnormalties in HIV + individuals also suggests that this diagnostic modality may be less sensitive in the HIV + population. Despite the limitation in methodology the present data thus suggest that the national diagnostic treatment algorithm may miss a substantial number of HIV + individuals with pulmonary tuberculosis. However, it is also important to note that patients who are smear-negative in our study, may not have TB. Against this background, we may speculate that many patients could be over-treated for TB.

In our study, the mean CD4/CD8 ratio was lower than 1, this indicates an increase of PTB among HIV patients, especially for negative smeargroup. Inability to properly diagnose pulmonary TB in the HIV infected population is hazardous to this immnuno-compromised population due to the well-known increased severity of pulmonary tuberculosis in TB-HIV co-infection. In addition there is a risk of immune-reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in patients on antiretroviral therapy with undiagnosed and those with untreated TB [4], this is unmasking TB IRIS. In other words, if TB remains undiagnosed in an HIV positive individual that starts antiretroviral therapy, there is a chance that the patient’s immune system may begin to recover but then respond to the TB infection with an overwhelming inflammatory response of patient [38].

Many studies have confirmed the superior effectiveness of culture methods when compared to smear microscopy [37, 39, 40]. To test TB diagnosis algorithms in resource-limited areas, the standard of care (evaluation through clinical symptoms, chest x-rays and smear microscopy) has been compared to confirmation of TB diagnosis through Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) technology which specifically detects and recovers mycobacteria. In a study conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America, the standard of care method was less sensitive in detecting TB than the culture method [39]. In Kenya, [35] a cross sectional study was conducted to ascertain the performance of the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) algorithm to diagnose PTB in HIV positive individuals. In this study, the use of culture increased significantly the proportion of confirmed TB cases. In 2010, WHO recommended the use of XpertMTB/RIF for HIV positive patients in order to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and rifampicin resistance [41]. GeneXpertMTB/RIF were reported to perform better than smear microscopy [4244]. Recent studies have shown that the urinary LAM test improves the diagnosis of TB in HIV + individuals among those who are severely immunocompromised, however this test performance is high in the very sickest patients [45, 46].

The limit of the National algorithm for the diagnosis of TB infection is that no culture lab exists in the country. Moreover, with regard to high risk of HIV people to get TB infection, it would be very useful to test negative sputum samples with the WHO endorsed GeneXpert technology.


In countries were TB and HIV are endemic, accurate and rapid diagnosis tools should be implemented. It is crucial to have access low-cost tools that are adapted to countries where resources are limited and to support health care providers with adequate training. This study showed that the current national treatment algorithm may adequately detect smear positive pulmonary TB in HIV- individuals.

In the present study, a consistent number of patients with smear-negative microscopy and negative radiology were found; therefore it is possible that many patients with negative smear pulmonary TB did not have TB. In order to avoid over-TB treatment, it appears urgent to use locally specific diagnostic methods such as culture or GeneXpert. However, our data also suggest that additional diagnostic modalities are required to diagnose TB in HIV + individuals, especially those with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.


  1. Wood R, Lawn SD, Caldwell J, Kaplan R, Middelkoop K, Bekker L-G, Bekker L-G: Burden of New and recurrent tuberculosis in a major south African city stratified by Age and HIV-status. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (10): e25098-10.1371/journal.pone.0025098. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization: Global tuberculosis control report. WHO Report. 2011, Accessed on 4 July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  3. UNAIDS: Report on the global AIDS epidemic. 2012,, available the 09/07/2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cain KP, McCarthy KD, Heilig CM, Monkongdee P, Tasaneeyapan T, Kanara N, Kimerling ME, Chheng P, Thai S, Sar B, Phanuphak P, Teeratakulpisarn N, Phanuphak N, Nguyen HD, Hoang TQ, Le HT, Varma JK: An algorithm for tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in people with HIV. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362 (8): 707-716. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907488.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Granich R, Akolo C, Gunneberg C, Getahun H, Williams P, Williams B:Prevention of tuberculosis in people living with HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 50 (Supplement 3): S215-S222. doi: 10.1086/651494,

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO, Stop TB Partnership: The Global Plan to Stop TB 2011–2015. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray F, Lescure FX, Adle-Biassette H, Polivka M, Gallien S, Pialoux G, Moulignier A: Encephalitis with infiltration by CD8+ lymphocytes in HIV patients receiving combination antiretroviral treatment. Brain Pathol. 2013, doi:10.1111/bpa.12038

    Google Scholar 

  8. Godfrey-Faussett P, Ayles H: Can we control tuberculosis in high HIV prevalence settings?. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2003, 83: 68-76. 10.1016/S1472-9792(02)00083-5. PMID: 12758192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tolu O, Burke R, Tsekela R, Bangani N, Seldon R, Gideon HP, Wood K, Wilkinson KA, Ottenhoff THM, Wilkinson RJ: High prevalence of subclinical tuberculosis in HIV-1-infected persons without advanced immunodeficiency: implications for TB screening. Thorax. 2011, 66 (8): 669-673. 10.1136/thx.2011.160168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbett EL, Marston B, Churchyard GJ, De Cock KM: Tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, challenges, and change in the era of antiretroviral treatment. Lancet. 2006, 367: 926-937. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68383-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization: Tuberculosis country profile: Congo. 2013, Accessed on 01 July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gray JM, Cohn DL: Tuberculosis and HIV coinfection. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 34 (1): 32-43. 10.1055/s-0032-1333469. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1333469. Epub 2013 Mar 4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martínez-Romero A, Ortega-Sánchez JL, González-Yañez MG, Hernández-Salgado JR, Ruíz-Baca E, Alba-Romero JJ, Cervantes-Flores M: Comparison of acid-fast bacilli smear and chromatographic immunoassay in patients with active tuberculosis. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012, 6 (8): 1690-1693.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swai HF, Mugusi FM, Mbwambo JK: Sputum smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis: sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic algorithm. BMC Res Notes. 2011, 4: 475-10.1186/1756-0500-4-475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodie D, Schluger NW: The diagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin Chest Med. 2005, 26: 247-271. 10.1016/j.ccm.2005.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawn SD, Brooks SV, Kranzer K, Nicol MP, Whitelaw A, Vogt M, Bekker LG, Wood R: Screening for HIV-associated tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance before antiretroviral therapy using the xpert MTB/RIF assay: a prospective study. PLoS Med. 2011, 8 (7): e1001067-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001067. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nahid P, Kim PS, Evans CA, Alland D, Barer M, Diefenbach J, Ellner J, Hafner R, Hamilton CD, Iademarco MF, Ireton G, Kimerling ME, Lienhardt C, MacKenzie WR, Murray M, Perkins MD, Posey JE, Roberts T, Sizemore C, Stevens WS, Via L, Williams SD, Yew WW, Swindells S: Clinical research and development of tuberculosis diagnostics: moving from silos to synergy. J Infect Dis. 2012, 205: S159-S168. 10.1093/infdis/jis194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mugusi F, Villamor E, Urassa W, Saathoff E, Bosch RJ, Fawzi WW: HIV co-infection, CD4 cell counts and clinical correlates of bacillary density in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006, 10: 663-669.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harries AD, Zachariah R, Lawn SD: Providing HIV care for co-infected tuberculosis patients: a perspective from sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009, 13 (1): 6-16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Padmanesan N, Wood J, MacIntyre CR, Mathai D: Risk factors for tuberculosis. Pulmonary medicine. 2013, 2013: Article ID 828939.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dimairo M, MacPherson P, Bandason T, Zezai A, Munyati SS, Butterworth AE, Mungofa S, Rusikaniko S, Fielding K, Mason PR, Corbett EL: The risk and timing of tuberculosis diagnosed in smear-negative TB suspects: a 12 month cohort study in Harare, Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (7): e11849-10.1371/journal.pone.0011849. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011849

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Brouwer M, Gudo PS, Simbe CM, Perdigão P, Van Leth F: Are routine tuberculosis programme data suitable to report on antiretroviral therapy use of HIV-infected tuberculosis patients?. BMC Rese Notes. 2013, 6: 23-10.1186/1756-0500-6-23. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-6-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dowdy DW, Lourenço MC, Cavalcante SC, Saraceni V, King B, Golub JE, Bishai D, Durovni B, Chaisson RE, Dorman SE: Impact and cost-effectiveness of culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV-infected Brazilian adults. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (12): e4057-10.1371/journal.pone.0004057. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004057

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Soumya S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Narendran G: HIV-associated tuberculosis: clinical update. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 50 (10): 1377-1386. 10.1086/652147. doi:10.1086/652147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cavanaugh JS, Shah NS, Cain KP, Winston CA: Survival among patients with HIV infection and smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis – United States, 1993–2006. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (10): e47855-10.1371/journal.pone.0047855. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047855

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Benova L, Fielding K, Greig J, Nyang’wa B-T, Casas EC, da Fonseca , du Cros P: Association of BMI category change with TB treatment mortality in HIV-positive smear-negative and extrapulmonary TB patients in Myanmar and Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (4): e35948-10.1371/journal.pone.0035948. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Padmapriyadarsini G, Swaminathan N, Swaminathan S: Diagnosis & treatment of tuberculosisin HIV co-infected patients. Indian J MedRes. 2011, 134: 850-865. 10.4103/0971-5916.92630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Foongladda S, Klayut W, Chinli R, Pholwat S, Houpt ER: Use of mycobacteriophage qPCR on MGIT broths for a rapid tuberculosis antibiogram. J Clin Microbiol. 2014, 52: 1523-1528. 10.1128/JCM.03637-13. doi:10.1128/JCM.03637-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawn SD, Wood R: Tuberculosis in antiretroviral treatment services in resource-limited settings: addressing the challenges of screening and diagnosis. J Infect Dis. 2011, 204 (suppl 4): S1159-S1167. 10.1093/infdis/jir411. doi:10.1093/infdis/jir411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rossato Silva D, Müller AM, Tarso Roth Dalcin DP: Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis in hospitalized patients in a high TB and HIV burden setting: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 57-10.1186/1471-2334-12-57. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Adeiza MA, Abba AA, Okpapi JU: HIV-associated tuberculosis: a sub-Saharan African perspective. 2014, 1 (1): 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alvarez-Uria G, Naik PK, Pakam R, Bachu L, Midde M: Natural history and factors associated with early and delayed mortality in HIV-infected patients treated of tuberculosis under directly observed treatment short-course strategy: a prospective cohort study in India. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012, 2012: Article ID 502012, 9 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Desikan P: Sputum smear microscopy in tuberculosis: is it still relevant?. Indian J Med Res. 2013, 137: 442-444.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Perkins MD: New diagnostic tools for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000, 12 (2): S182-S188.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huerga H, Varaine F, Okwaro E, Bastard M, Ardizzoni E, Sitienei J, Chakaya J, Bonnet M: Performance of the 2007 WHO algorithm to diagnose smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in a HIV prevalent setting. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (12): e51336-10.1371/journal.pone.0051336. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoffmann CJ, Variava E, Rakgokong M, Masonoke K, van der Watt M, Chaisson RE, Martinson NA: High prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis but Low sensitivity of symptom screening among HIV-infected pregnant women in South Africa. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (4): e62211-10.1371/journal.pone.0062211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis JL, Worodria W, Kisembo H, Metcalfe JZ, Cattamanchi A, Kawooya M, Kyeyune R, den Boon S, Powell K, Okello R, Yoo S, Huang L: Clinical and radiographic factors Do Not accurately diagnose smear-negative tuberculosis in HIV-infected inpatients in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (3): e9859-10.1371/journal.pone.0009859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mayer K: Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a reappraisal. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 48 (1): 101-107. 10.1086/595006. doi:10.1086/595006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Swindells S, Komarow L, Tripathy S, Cain KP, MacGregor RR, Achkar JM, Gupta A, Veloso VG, Asmelash A, Omoz-Oarhe AE, Gengiah S, Lalloo U, Allen R, Shiboski C, Andersen J, Qasba SS, Katzenstein DK, AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5253 Study Team: Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected individuals: AIDS clinical trials group protocol A5253. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013, 17 (4): 532-539. 10.5588/ijtld.12.0737. doi:10.5588/ijtld.12.0737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Narendran G, Selvakumar N, Risbud AR, Sheta D, Rajasekaran S, Thomas A, Wares F, Swaminathan S: Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected adults. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013, 63 (3): 331-338. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31829341af. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31829341af

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. World Health Organization: Tuberculosis diagnostics xpertmtb/Rif test. WHO Endorsement and Recommendations. 2010, Accessed on July 3, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  42. O'Grady J, Bates M, Chilukutu L, Mzyece J, Cheelo B, Chilufya M, Mukonda L, Mumba M, Tembo J, Chomba M, Kapata N, Maeurer M, Rachow A, Clowes P, Hoelscher M, Mwaba P, Zumla A: Evaluation of the xpert MTB/RIF assay at a tertiary care referral hospital in a setting where tuberculosis and HIV infection Are highly endemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 55 (9): 1171-1178. 10.1093/cid/cis631. doi:10.1093/cid/cis631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Steingart KR, Sohn H, Schiller I, Kloda LA, Boehme CC, Pai M, Dendukuri N: Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, Art. No.: CD009593. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub2, 1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Carriquiry G, Otero L, González-Lagos E, Zamudio C, Sánchez E, Nabeta P, Campos M, Echevarría J, Seas C, Gotuzzo E: A diagnostic accuracy study of Xpert®MTB/RIF in HIV-positive patients with high clinical suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (9): e44626-10.1371/journal.pone.0044626. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lawn SD, Kerkhoff AD, Vogt M, Wood R: Diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost, urine antigen, point-of-care screening assay for HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis before antiretroviral therapy: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012, 12 (3): 201-209. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70251-1. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70251-1. Epub 2011 Oct 17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lawn SD: Point-of-care detection of lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in urine for diagnosis of HIV-associated tuberculosis: a state of the art review. BMC Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 103-10.1186/1471-2334-12-103. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-103. Review

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all the participants to this study. We also thank Drs. Rüsch-Gerdes and Stephan Nieman for their contribution to this work. LSGL, PIM, JV, MM and FKK received support of CANTAM network. Dr S. Oyakhiromen is recipient of EDCTP senior fellowship. We are grateful to Dr Sylvie Kwedi Nolna for the critical reading and editing of the manuscript.

This work has been supported through the Central Africa Network on Tuberculosis, HIV/AIDs and Malaria (CANTAM), which is a network of excellence supported by EDCTP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francine Ntoumi.

Additional information

Competing interests

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

PIM, MM, FN, MF, VP: Study design. LSGL, SAS, LKM, BE, SO: recruitment of patients, carried out analyses. JCV, LSGL, SAS, FN: data analysis. LSGL, PIM, FN: Drafted the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linguissi, L.S.G., Mayengue, P.I., Sidibé, A. et al. Prevalence of national treatment algorithm defined smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV positive patients in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. BMC Res Notes 7, 578 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: