- Short Report
- Open Access
Ophthalmic infections in children presenting to Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia
BMC Research Notesvolume 7, Article number: 784 (2014)
Ophthalmic infections cause significant morbidity in Cambodian children but aetiologic data are scarce. We investigated the causes of acute eye infections in 54 children presenting to the ophthalmology clinic at Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap between March and October 2012.
The median age at presentation was 3.6 years (range 6 days – 16.0 years). Forty two patients (77.8%) were classified as having an external eye infection, ten (18.5%) as ophthalmia neonatorum, and two (3.7%) as intra-ocular infection. Organisms were identified in all ophthalmia neonatorum patients and 85.7% of patients with an external eye infection. Pathogens were not detected in either of the intra-ocular infection patients. Most commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (23 isolates), coagulase-negative staphylococci (13), coliforms (7), Haemophilus influenzae/parainfluenzae (6), Streptococcus pneumoniae (4), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (2). Chlamydia trachomatis DNA was detected in 60% of swabs taken from ophthalmia neonatorum cases.
This small study demonstrates the wide range of pathogens associated with common eye infections in Cambodian children. The inclusion of molecular assays improved the spectrum of detectable pathogens, most notably in neonates.
Ophthalmic infections are a major cause of acute and chronic morbidity in Cambodian children, and one of the commonest causes of visual impairment in this population [1–3]. However, there are limited data on the spectrum of microbial organisms causing these infections in Cambodia, since diagnostic laboratory facilities and ophthalmology services are scare, with an estimate of less than twenty trained ophthalmologists practising in the entire country (http://www.hollows.org.au/our-work/where-we-work-country/cambodia). The aim of this study was to make a preliminary assessment of the causes of infections in children presenting to the ophthalmic service at Angkor Hospital for Children (AHC) in Siem Reap to aid empirical prescribing practice, inform public health interventions and establish a surveillance baseline for the monitoring of disease trends. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Angkor Hospital for Children, Cambodia and the Oxford Tropical Ethics Committee, UK (ref 46-11).
Between 1st March and 31st October 2012, children presenting to the AHC eye clinic with clinical evidence of ophthalmic infection were invited to participate in the study and written consent obtained from the attending parent or caregiver. Swabs, corneal scrapings, or intra-ocular specimens were submitted for microscopy and bacterial culture, according to the clinical diagnosis. Specimens were transported to the onsite microbiology immediately after collection and were cultured on a variety of culture media (all specimens: 5% sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, Sabouraud agar, fastidious anaerobe agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK; prepared in house); if a specimen from a neonate: additional selective plate for isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae; if corneal scrape or intra-ocular pus specimen: additional culture in thioglycollate broth with subculture to fastidious anaerobe agar after 48 hours) and incubated for up to 48 hours aerobically, anaerobically, or in 5-10% CO2 as appropriate. Cultured organisms were identified by colony morphology, Gram stain characteristics, and standard microbiologic techniques . Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed by disk diffusion according to current Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines . Benzyl penicillin and ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by Etest (bioMerieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) for Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with a 1 μg oxacillin disc zone diameter of <20 mm, and interpreted using the CLSI guidelines. In addition to bacterial culture, an aliquot of each specimen was stored at -80°C in 200 μL sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for molecular analysis. Nucleic acids were extracted from the stored specimen aliquots using the NucliSENS easyMag system (bioMerieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) and Chlamydia trachomatis, adenovirus, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 and 2 infections were detected by real-time PCR assays, as previously described [6–8].
Fifty four patients were enrolled in the study. The median age at presentation was 3.6 years (interquartile range 0.3 – 11.1 years; range 6 days – 16.0 years). Thirty patients (30/54; 55.6%) were male. Forty two patients (42/54; 77.8%) were classified as having an external eye infection (conjunctivitis (11), corneal ulcer (11), dacrocystitis (7), stye (7), eyelid abscess (6)), ten (18.5%) as ophthalmia neonatorum, and two (3.7%) as intra-ocular infection. At least one bacterial or viral species was detected from specimens submitted for 46 patients (46/54; 85.2%; Table 1): more than one organism was detected in a third of specimens (17/54; 31.5%; Table 2). Potentially pathogenic organisms were identified in all (10/10) ophthalmia neonatorum patients and 85.7% (36/42) of patients with an external eye infection. There was no growth from specimens in both of the intra-ocular infection patients. Antimicrobial susceptibility test results for commonly cultured organisms are shown in Table 3. Chlamydia trachomatis DNA was detected in swabs from seven patients (7/54; 13.0%): six were ophthalmia neonatorum presentations and one of these was a co-infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. HSV DNA was detected from a swab in one child presenting with corneal ulceration. Adenovirus DNA was not detected in any specimens.
This study, although small, demonstrates the wide range of pathogens responsible for common eye infections in Cambodian children. These organisms are generally similar to those found in reports from other populations [9, 10]. Variations between study results may reflect age distribution of cases, contact lens use (a risk factor for keratitis), and host factors such as malnutrition and immunisation status [11–13]. However, the absence of confirmed adenovirus or fungal infection was surprising and perhaps attributable to the small sample size, the limited duration of the study (which have resulted in a missed seasonal adenovirus outbreak), specimen factors (i.e. most specimens were swabs), and the short incubation period for fungal culture plates (although fungal elements were not seen on microscopy in any of the specimens). Larger studies in this population maybe warranted to validate the current findings. The isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the cause of melioidosis, from an eyelid abscess is noteworthy and demonstrates the diversity of presentation of infections with this organism . Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently cultured organism and the majority (22/23; 95.7%) of isolates were meticillin sensitive, although with the emergence of community-acquired meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections in Cambodia this may change with time . Isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae were penicillin and fluoroquinolone resistant but susceptible to ceftriaxone, which is similar to the findings of other eye infection studies from Southeast Asia [16, 17]. The addition of molecular testing increased the spectrum of detectable pathogens, most notably in neonates where 60% of infections were associated with detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA. Maternal screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI) in pregnancy and tetracycline eye ointment administration for newborns are not routine practice in Cambodia but may be desirable given the frequent isolation of STI-related organisms from ophthalmia neonatorum cases. These data will serve as a useful baseline for further studies of these important infections in Cambodia.
Thomson I: A clinic based survey of blindness and eye disease in Cambodia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997, 81 (7): 578-580. 10.1136/bjo.81.7.578.
Jackson H, Foster A: Causes of blindness in northwest Cambodia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997, 4 (1): 27-32. 10.3109/09286589709058058.
Rutzen AR, Ellish NJ, Schwab L, Graham PJ, Pizzarello LD, Hemady RK, Maldonado MJ: Blindness and eye disease in Cambodia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007, 14 (6): 360-366. 10.1080/01658100701436033.
Dumler JS, Funke G, Janda JM, Nachamkin I, Versalovic J: Bacteriology. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Volume 1. Edited by: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA. 2007, Washington DC: ASM Press, 272-1074. 9
CLSI: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Seventeenth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S23. 2013, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA
Jalal H, Stephen H, Curran MD, Burton J, Bradley M, Carne C: Development and validation of a rotor-gene real-time PCR assay for detection, identification, and quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis in a single reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44 (1): 206-213. 10.1128/JCM.44.1.206-213.2006.
Jansen RR, Schinkel J, Koekkoek S, Pajkrt D, Beld M, De Jong MD, Molenkamp R: Development and evaluation of a four-tube real time multiplex PCR assay covering fourteen respiratory viruses, and comparison to its corresponding single target counterparts. J Clin Virol. 2011, 51 (3): 179-185. 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.04.010.
Van Doornum GJ, Guldemeester J, Osterhaus AD, Niesters HG: Diagnosing herpesvirus infections by real-time amplification and rapid culture. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41 (2): 576-580. 10.1128/JCM.41.2.576-580.2003.
Sergiwa A, Pratt BC, Eren E, Sunona TC, Hart CA: Ophthalmia neonatorum in Bangkok: the significance of Chlamydia trachomatis. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1993, 13 (3): 233-236.
Shah A, Sachdev A, Coggon D, Hossain P: Geographic variations in microbial keratitis: an analysis of the peer-reviewed literature. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011, 95 (6): 762-767. 10.1136/bjo.2009.169607.
Young AL, Leung KS, Tsim N, Hui M, Jhanji V: Risk factors, microbiological profile, and treatment outcomes of pediatric microbial keratitis in a tertiary care hospital in Hong Kong. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013, 156 (5): 1040-1044. 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.019. e1042
Lee YS, Tan HY, Yeh LK, Lin HC, Ma DH, Chen HC, Chen SY, Chen PY, Hsiao CH: Pediatric microbial keratitis in Taiwan: clinical and microbiological profiles, 1998-2002 versus 2008-2012. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014, 157 (5): 1090-1096. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.013.
Jhanji V, Naithani P, Lamoureux E, Agarwal T, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB: Immunization and nutritional profile of cases with atraumatic microbial keratitis in preschool age group. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011, 151 (6): 1035-1040. 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.006. e1032
Pagnarith Y, Kumar V, Thaipadungpanit J, Wuthiekanun V, Amornchai P, Sin L, Day NP, Peacock SJ: Emergence of pediatric melioidosis in Siem Reap, Cambodia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 82 (6): 1106-1112. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0030.
Chheng K, Tarquinio S, Wuthiekanun V, Sin L, Thaipadungpanit J, Amornchai P, Chanpheaktra N, Tumapa S, Putchhat H, Day NP, Peacock SJ: Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with pediatric infection in Cambodia. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (8): e6630-10.1371/journal.pone.0006630.
Vernel-Pauillac F, Ratsima EH, Guillard B, Goursaud R, Lethezer C, Hem S, Merien F, Goarant C: Correlation between antibiotic susceptibilities and genotypes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae from different geographical origins: determinants monitoring by real-time PCR as a complementary tool for surveillance. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86 (2): 106-111. 10.1136/sti.2009.038000.
Olsen B, Pham TL, Golparian D, Johansson E, Tran HK, Unemo M: Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Vietnam, 2011. BMC Infect Dis. 2013, 13: 40-10.1186/1471-2334-13-40.
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust of the United Kingdom and the Li Ka Shing Foundation – University of Oxford Global Health Programme. Stephen Baker is a Sir Henry Dale Fellow, jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (100087/Z/12/Z).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
PK, CS, NS, CM, KE, SB, RD, ND, and CP conceived the study. PK, CS, and RB collected the clinical specimens and data. SS, CM, DT, VH, SB, and RD performed the laboratory work. PT and PK analysed the data. PT and CP wrote the paper. All authors contributed to revisions of the manuscript and approved the final version.