Open Access

Thermal reference points as an index for monitoring body temperature in marine mammals

  • Mar Melero1Email author,
  • Víctor Rodríguez-Prieto1,
  • Ana Rubio-García1,
  • Daniel García-Párraga2 and
  • José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno1
BMC Research Notes20158:411

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1383-6

Received: 16 January 2014

Accepted: 24 August 2015

Published: 4 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Monitoring body temperature is essential in veterinary care as minor variations may indicate dysfunction. Rectal temperature is widely used as a proxy for body temperature, but measuring it requires special equipment, training or restraining, and it potentially stresses animals. Infrared thermography is an alternative that reduces handling stress, is safer for technicians and works well for untrained animals. This study analysed thermal reference points in five marine mammal species: bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus); beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas); Patagonian sea lion (Otaria flavescens); harbour seal (Phoca vitulina); and Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens).

Results

The thermogram analysis revealed that the internal blowhole mucosa temperature is the most reliable indicator of body temperature in cetaceans. The temperatures taken during voluntary breathing with a camera held perpendicularly were practically identical to the rectal temperature in bottlenose dolphins and were only 1 °C lower than the rectal temperature in beluga whales. In pinnipeds, eye temperature appears the best parameter for temperature control. In these animals, the average times required for temperatures to stabilise after hauling out, and the average steady-state temperature values, differed according to species: Patagonian sea lions, 10 min, 31.13 °C; harbour seals, 10 min, 32.27 °C; Pacific walruses, 5 min, 29.93 °C.

Conclusions

The best thermographic and most stable reference points for monitoring body temperature in marine mammals are open blowhole in cetaceans and eyes in pinnipeds.

Keywords

Thermography Thermal pattern Blowhole temperature Eye temperature Cetaceans Pinnipeds

Findings

Background

Marine mammals have adapted to the aquatic environment after a long evolution process that started 60 million years ago [1]. Since they live partially or entirely in water, thermoregulation is a significant challenge. Entirely aquatic mammals, like cetaceans, must constantly maintain a body temperature within narrow limits in an environment where heat is conducted 25 times faster than in air [2, 3]. Amphibious mammals like pinnipeds require additional mechanisms to maintain the physiological temperature range when they leave water. Since slight variations in body temperature may indicate body dysfunction [4], infection [5] or physiological processes like estrus and proximity to parturition [6], accurate measurements and easy body temperature monitoring are very useful in veterinary care.

Since body temperature could be measured directly in marine mammals only after death [7], radio-pills were developed which, when ingested, allow body temperature measurements in live animals [8]. However, this method is costly, affected by food ingestion, some individuals may vomit the device, and reader has to remain reasonably close to the animal to record the temperature. At present, the body temperature in live marine mammals is usually estimated from rectal readings [6, 9, 10]. Rectal temperature closely correlates with body temperature [11, 12]. However, measuring rectal temperature in marine mammals requires special probes, training or restraining, can induce stress in animals, and requires time to obtain measurements, which mean that it is unsuitable under certain circumstances; e.g., newborns, untrained animals, or animals in the wild. Moreover, the depth at which the rectal probe enters influences the temperature reading as testes (located on both sides next to the rectum) and uterus are cooled by the vascular countercurrent heat exchanger [1316]. In certain circumstances, taking rectal temperature might even require anaesthetising the animal because some species and individuals do not tolerate rectal temperature measurements [5], including domestic animals like dogs as only 68 % tolerate it [17]. In addition, physiological processes like digestion or peristalsis, the presence of faecal masses, and the level of muscle tone and physical activity may alter rectal temperature measurements [18].

New technologies have been developed to avoid the disadvantages of these temperature measurement methods. One is infrared thermography, in which thermal radiation at wavelengths of between 0.8 and 1.0 mm is collected and quantified from the animal to be transformed into a digital image [4]. This technique offers many advantages. It can be used at a long distance from the animal [19], it reduces handling stress and ensures technicians’ safety. It can generate thermograms of many individuals in a short period of time and serves as a non-invasive diagnostic tool since it can detect variations in surface body temperature due to trauma, inflammation, infection, neurological processes, neoplasm, heat emission from internal organs or heating by external sources [10].

Infrared thermography has been applied to study many domestic species [20] and wildlife [21], including marine mammals [2225]. Eye temperatures measured by thermography have been shown to be practically the same, or at least correlate with body temperatures in several mammal species [5, 26, 27], including human beings [28]. However, reference points on the surface of an animal that can be used reliably to estimate body temperature have not been established for most species, especially those studied mainly in the wild. This manuscript aims to apply thermography to five species of marine mammals in order to establish thermal reference points as an index of body temperature based on its easy measurement and its variance.

Methods

Thermographic measurements were carried out in two cetacean species, namely bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas). Three pinniped species were also studied: Patagonian sea lion (Otaria flavescens), harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), and Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens). The study was performed in December 2007 and April 2008 with the assistance of animal trainers.

All the animals were housed at the Oceanografic Aquarium of Valencia, and all the national and international permits were in order. No special permits were required for this research because thermograms were taken without modifying the animals’ behaviour and rectal temperature measurements were performed within the Oceanografic’s routine procedures.

The air and water temperature facilities were monitored twice daily. Bottlenose dolphins, harbour seals and Patagonian sea lions were housed in independent outdoor facilities where the air temperature ranged between 8.2 and 22.0 °C in December 2007 and between 18.0 and 20.0 °C in April 2008. Water temperature was maintained between 16.6 and 16.8 °C for bottlenose dolphins, between 17.6 and 18.1 °C for Patagonian sea lions and between 16.1 and 16.7 °C for harbour seals. Belugas and walruses were housed in indoor facilities located in the same building. The air temperature there was maintained between 15 and 18 °C, and the water temperature was kept between 13.5 and 15.0 °C for belugas and between 14.6 and 15.8 °C for walruses.

For cetaceans, eye and blowhole thermograms were obtained from a distance of less than 2 m while the animal was breathing voluntarily and on demand in the water. Ten adult bottlenose dolphins (two males and eight females) and two adult beluga whales (one male and one female) were imaged. During the sessions, which lasted no more than 22 and 15 min, 253 and 284 thermograms of eyes and 67 and 74 of blowholes were taken in dolphins and belugas, respectively.

For pinnipeds, the thermograms of ears, eyes, nostrils, vibrissal area, mouth and axillas were obtained. Eleven adult Patagonian sea lions (two males and nine females) and two male pups were imaged. During the sessions, which lasted no more than 18 min, 243 thermograms were taken as soon as the animals left the pool, with the camera positioned at less than 5 m from the animals. Six adult harbour seals (three males and three females) and one female cub were imaged. During the sessions, which lasted no more than 25 min, 264 thermograms were taken from a distance of less than 10 m and as soon as the animals poked their heads out of the water. Five juvenile Pacific walruses (one male and four females) were imaged. During the sessions, which lasted no more than 65 min, 388 thermograms were taken after the animals left the pool, with the camera positioned less than 5 m from the animal.

A ThermaCAM E45 Infrared Camera with a FOV25 lens (FLIR, Burlington, ON, Canada) was used for the thermographic measurements. Its thermal sensitivity is 0.1 at 25 °C. Images were analysed by the ThermaCAM QuickReport 1.0 software (FLIR), and the maximum temperatures in each area of the thermograms were calculated. Since blowholes remain open only briefly during breathing, the thermographic videos were recorded. Later in order to ensure the most accurate measurement, each video frame was analysed individually to calculate the maximum temperature inside the blowhole. Since video frames could not be evaluated with this software, only in this case, temperature measurements correspond to a little bigger area than the anatomical region evaluated. A significant relationship between dorsal fin surface temperature and water temperature have been previously determined, being the animal surface around 0.9 °C warmer than the water [25]. In this study, as expected, all temperature measurements of the surrounding skin were cooler than the interior of the blowhole, so the maximum temperature value always correspond to a point located inside it. In order to evaluate the stabilisation period of eye temperatures, thermograms were taken every 30 s after the animal left the water.

The emissivity of these animals was assumed to be 0.96, the same as water [29], and as Cuyler et al. [24] established for marine mammals given the thin film of water that covers their body surface, the tear film on their eyes or normal secretion in respiratory mucosa. The angle between the camera and the animal was taken into account because of its relevance in measurement accuracy [24, 25]. Hence, the values were divided into two groups: perpendicular, i.e., when the camera was situated perpendicularly to the animal; inclined, i.e., at angles over 30º.

In all the cetaceans, the rectal temperatures were measured at the same time as the eye and blowhole temperatures using a flexible probe thermometer with a Propaq Encore 202EL monitor (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA). In order to perform temperature measures in a region anterior to the countercurrent heat exchanger, rectal probe was positioned at 40 cm deep to the anus in bottlenose dolphin, as Rommel et al. [14] described; and at 50–60 cm in beluga whale. To ensure temperature values were not influenced by the countercurrent heat exchanger, it was verified during the retreat of the probe that higher temperatures were not registered. Rectal temperatures in pinnipeds were measured only in three walruses and in two sea lions because the remaining animals were not trained for this purpose.

For the statistical analysis, the maximum temperatures and standard deviations of each area were calculated and the Pearson product-moment approach was followed to evaluate the correlation between the rectal temperature and the simultaneous eye and blowhole measures with the SAS 9.1.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NY, USA). A Kruskal–Wallis test was done to compare the temperature of each anatomical area according to the age and gender of the animals, and the hour of the day; for this purpose, the software R, version 2.15.2, was employed (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012). For all the comparisons, a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Temperatures values were obtained for all the animals for almost all the thermographic areas studied, and the means, standard deviations and correlations were calculated (Table 1).
Table 1

Temperature values of marine mammals measured by thermography

 

Patagonian sea lion

Harbour seal

Pacific walrus

Bottlenose dolphin

Beluga whale

Rectal

37.07 ± 0.058

36.22 ± 0.383

36.75 ± 0.369

35.68 ± 0.184

Ears

22.81 ± 6.030

  

Eyes

     

 Overall

10 min

31.13 ± 1.706

0.873*

10 min

32.27 ± 0.901

5 min

29.93 ± 1.015

0.599*

1 min

32.93 ± 1.053

0.801*

1 min

32.14 ± 0.847

0.607*

 Males

31.38 ± 1.518

32.89 ± 0.352

=

=

x

 Females

29.56 ± 1.448

31.49 ± 0.756

=

=

x

 Pups

22.29 ± 2.344

21.73 ± 1.972

x

x

x

 Adults

28.55 ± 2.885

27.07 ± 5.434

x

x

x

Vibrissal area

     

 Overall

26.23 ± 4.220

23.54 ± 6.764

23.75 ± 3.739

  

 Males

27.37 ± 3.641

29.91 ± 4.779

=

  

 Females

24.29 ± 2.778

18.04 ± 1.757

=

  

 Pups

18.94 ± 1.323

18.11 ± 1.445

x

  

 Adults

26.20 ± 3.649

25.32 ± 6.879

x

  

Mouth

30.89 ± 3.191

  

Blowhole

 Voluntary

  Perpendicular

   

36.86 ± 0.297

0.997*

34.73 ± 0.665

0.994*

  Inclined

   

33.5 ± 2.246

33.21 ± 1.537

 On demand

  Perpendicular

   

33.92 ± 1.256

0.448*

31.82 ± 0.670

0.876*

  Inclined

   

30.06 ± 2.098

28.76 ± 1.687

Maximum temperatures (mean ± standard deviation) of each analysed anatomical region of the five species of marine mammals, displayed in Celsius degrees (°C). [Patagonian sea lion (Otaria flavescens), harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens), bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas)]

–: Not enough valuable thermal measurements were collected

=: Differences were found not to be significant using a Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05)

x: Not enough individuals of different gender or age were studied to estimate these parameters

* Correlation with rectal temperature

For cetaceans, the thermographs of eyes and blowholes were analysed (Table 1). Eye temperature stabilised equally rapidly (within 1 min), and a steady-state value was obtained (Table 1). The stabilisation time was shorter than in pinnipeds, probably because the anatomical and physiological differences of marine mammals’ eyes as cetaceans have well-developed vascular multivessel plexuses [30, 31]. Blowhole temperature accuracy depended on where the thermal camera was positioned in relation to the animal, and also depending on whether or not the thermal data were collected during voluntary breathing or breathing on demand. The lowest standard deviation was reached at the mean maximum blowhole temperature during voluntary breathing, when thermograms were taken perpendicularly to the surface of the blowhole opening (Fig. 1). Variation in the blowhole temperature was even greater according to whether or not animals were breathing voluntarily or on demand, irrespectively of whether animals were inspiring or exhaling (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Blowhole of a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Digital (a) and thermographic (b) images of the blowhole during voluntary breathing with the thermal camera placed perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the dolphin

The mean rectal temperature was 36.75 ± 0.369 °C (mean ± standard deviation) in bottlenose dolphins and 35.68 ± 0.184 °C in beluga whales. The blowhole gave the highest correlation with rectal temperature when measured perpendicularly during voluntarily breathing (Table 1). The poorest correlation during breathing on demand was probably due to the shorter time that the blowhole remained open and due to its smaller aperture, which limited measurement quality.

Our results suggest that, in cetaceans, blowhole is superior to eyes as a thermal reference point during voluntary breathing, it obtain the lowest variance and the highest correlation with rectal temperature, and a temperature stabilisation period is not needed (Fig. 2). When thermograms were taken perpendicularly during voluntary breathing, the temperature was practically the same as the rectal temperature in bottlenose dolphins and was only 1 °C lower than the rectal temperature in beluga whales (Table 1).
Fig. 2

Pinnipeds eye temperature stabilisation and cetaceans blowhole temperature along time. Pinnipeds eye temperature for 18 min after leaving the water of one individual of each different species under study [Patagonian sea lion (Otaria flavescens), harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens)]. Cetaceans blowhole temperature during voluntary breathings measured perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of one individual of each evaluated specie [Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas)]

This suggests that the thermography of blowhole opening can be a useful tool for monitoring body temperature in captive cetaceans as it is more rapid and less invasive than measuring rectal temperature. In individuals with an injury or a local inflammatory process that affects the blowhole area or upper airways, eyes can be an alternative index for body temperature.

For pinnipeds, six anatomical areas were analysed by thermography. We considered that eyes were the best thermal reference point in these animals because eye temperature gave the lowest standard deviation (Table 1), obtained a stable value, was easy to measure and no training was needed. Eye temperature increased gradually after leaving the water to then stabilise after a period of time depending on the species (Fig. 2). Similarly, the steady-state temperature achieved depended on the species (Table 1). Some variations of eye temperature, lower than 0.8 °C, were registered after the stabilisation period. These differences were considered small, since Morgan et al. [32] established a difference of 0.6 °C between both eyes of the same individual as the upper limit for 95 % of the normal human population. The mean rectal temperature was 37.07 ± 0.058 °C in Patagonian sea lions and 36.22 ± 0.383 °C in Pacific walruses. Eyes gave the highest correlation with rectal temperature when measured after the temperature stabilisation period. However, as it was not possible to measure rectal temperature in harbour seals, we were unable to directly correlate eye temperature with body temperature.

For the remaining anatomical regions, we were unable to collect enough valuable measurements from nostrils and axillas to do a statistical analysis. Likewise, ear measurements and mouth values were considered only for harbour seals and Pacific walruses, respectively (Table 1). This situation came about given the difficulty to access these anatomical areas, requirement of training to maintain the correct position, or temperatures continued to be similar to the rest of the body, so it was not possible to assess statistical differences. The thermography of the vibrissal area was highly variable; this region is often affected by the appearance of physiological thermal windows, which make accurate measurements very difficult (Table 1).

The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed statistically significant differences according to gender in Patagonian sea lions (eyes and vibrissal area temperatures), harbour seals (ears, eyes and vibrissal area temperatures) and bottlenose dolphins (blowhole during voluntary breathing). Likewise, significant differences were found in accordance with the age of Patagonian sea lions (eyes and vibrissal area temperatures) and harbour seals (ears, eyes and vibrissal area temperatures). According to these parameters, males obtained higher temperature values than females, and adults presented higher temperatures than pups. However, as all the individuals belonged to the same group, it was not possible to evaluate the effect of gender in belugas and the effect of age in walruses, dolphins and belugas. No significant differences in the reference temperatures after the stabilisation periods were found in accordance with circadian rhythm, and the air and water temperatures for any of the species examined. The robustness of this method should be tested with a larger number of animals, and with a broader range of physiologic, pathologic and ambient conditions, particularly in natural habitats.

Further studies are required to establish the equivalence between rectal and eye or blowhole temperature in a larger number of individuals, in hyper- and hypothermic animals, and also under a wider range of environmental conditions.

Conclusions

In cetaceans, the best thermographic reference point for body temperature is the blowhole, and the thermal data should be collected when the animal is breathing voluntarily with the camera held perpendicularly to its blowhole opening. Under these conditions, the mean maximum blowhole temperature is practically the same as the rectal temperature in bottlenose dolphins and is only 1 °C lower in beluga whales. In pinnipeds, the eye can be a good thermographic reference point as an index for monitoring body temperature, but measurements should be taken only after a stabilisation period, which is characteristic for each species.

These results suggest that thermography is a reliable, immediate, remote, non-invasive tool that can prove useful for taking thermal measurements of the anatomical referent points to monitor body temperature in marine mammals. This technique is especially useful for untrained animals because previous training is not necessary, it is safe for technicians and it avoids stressing the animals.

Abbreviations

°C: 

Degree celsius

min: 

Minutes

m: 

Metre

cm: 

Centimetre

mm: 

Millimetre

µm: 

Micrometre

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MM, VRP and ARG collected and analysed the thermograms. DGP measured rectal temperature. DGP and JMSV coordinated and oversaw the study. MM, VRP and ARG wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Oceanografic marine mammal and veterinary staff for their assistance and the Pfizer Foundation for financial support. We thank Armando Chapin Rodríguez and Helen Warbuton for helping us with the English in the manuscript, and Beatriz Martínez-López for assistance in the statistical analyses. Mar Melero is the recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the PhD student grant program of Complutense University of Madrid and Víctor Rodríguez-Prieto is the recipient of an FPU grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
VISAVET Center, Veterinary School, Complutense University of Madrid
(2)
Veterinary Services, Oceanografic, Parques Reunidos Valencia

References

  1. Williams TM, Worthy GAJ. Anatomy and physiology: the challenge of aquatic living. In: Hoelzel AR, editor. Marine mammal biology: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002. p. 73–97.Google Scholar
  2. Nadel ER. Energy exchanges in water. Undersea Biomed Res. 1984;11:149–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dejours P. Water and air physical characteristics and their physiological consequences. In: Dejours P, Bolis L, Taylor CR, Weibel ER, editors. Comparative physiology: life in water and on land. Padova: Liviana Press; 1987. p. 3–11.Google Scholar
  4. Jones B. A reappraisal of the use of infrared thermal image analysis in medicine. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 1998;17(6):1019–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson SR, Rao S, Hussey SB, Morley PS, Traub-Dargatz JL. Thermographic eye temperature as an index to body temperature in ponies. J Equine Vet Sci. 2011;31:63–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Katsumata E. Study on reproduction of captive marine mammals. J Reprod Dev. 2010;56(1):1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Morrison P. Body temperatures in some Australian mammals. III. Cetacea (Megaptera). Biol Bull. 1962;123:154–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Whittow GC, Hampton IFG, Matsuura DT, Ohata CA, Smith RM, Allen JF. Body temperature of three species of whales. J Mamm. 1974;55(3):653–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Geraci JR, Lounsbury VJ. Marine mammals ashore. a field guide for strandings. Galveston: A&M Sea Grant Publication; 1993.Google Scholar
  10. Walsh MT, Gaynor EV. Thermal imaging of marine mammals. In: Dierauf L, Gulland FMD, editors. CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine. 2nd edition ed. Florida: CRC Press; 2001. p. 643–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Michaud A. Comparison of an infrared ear thermometer to rectal thermometers in cats. Fel Pract. 1996;24:25–30.Google Scholar
  12. Greer RJ, Cohn LA, Dodam JR, Wagner-Mann CC, Mann FA. Comparison of three methods of temperature measurement in hypothermic, euthermic, and hyperthermic dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;230(12):1841–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pabst DA, Rommel SA, McLellan WA, Williams TM, Rowles TK. Thermoregulation of the intra-abdominal testes of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) during exercise. J Exp Biol. 1995;198:221–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rommel SA, Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Williams TM, Friedl WA. Temperature regulation of the testes of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): evidence from colonic temperatures. J Comp Physiol B. 1994;164(2):130–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rommel SA, Pabst DA, McLellan WA. Functional morphology of the vascular plexuses associated with the cetacean uterus. Anat Rec. 1993;237(4):538–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rommel SA, Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Mead JG, Potter CW. Anatomical evidence for a countercurrent heat exchanger associated with dolphin testes. Anat Rec. 1992;232(1):150–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sousa MG, Carareto R, Pereira-Junior VA, Aquino MC. Comparison between auricular and standard rectal thermometers for the measurement of body temperature in dogs. Can Vet J. 2011;52(4):403–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rexroat J, Benish K, Fraden J. Clinical accuracy of Vet-Temp™ instant ear thermometer: Comparative study with dogs and cats. www.mimi12.com/img/Clinical_Accuracy.pdf.
  19. McCafferty DJ. The value of infrared thermography for research on mammals: previous applications and future directions. Mamm Rev. 2007;37(3):177–255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yanmaz LE, Okumus Z, Dogan E. Instrumentation of thermography and its application in horses. J Anim Vet Adv. 2007;6:858–62.Google Scholar
  21. Hilsberg-Merz S. Infrared thermography in zoo and wild animals. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, editors. Zoo and wild animal medicine, current therapy, vol. 6. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2007. p. 20–32.Google Scholar
  22. Rodríguez-Prieto V, Rubio-García A, Melero M, García D, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. Identification of the pattern of appearance and development of thermal windows in the skin of juvenile Pacific walruses (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) in a controlled environment. Mar Mamm Sci. 2013;29(1):167–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mauck B, Bilgmann K, Jones DD, Eysel U, Dehnhardt G. Thermal windows on the trunk of hauled-out seals: hot spots for thermoregulatory evaporation? J Exp Biol. 2003;206:1727–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cuyler LC, Wiulsrød R, ØRitsland NA. Thermal infrared radiation from free living whales. Mar Mamm Sci. 1992;8(2):120–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Barbieri MM, McLellan WA, Wells RS, Blum JE, Hofmann S, Gannon J, Pabst DA. Using infrared thermography to assess seasonal trends in dorsal fin surface temperatures of free-swimming bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Mar Mamm Sci. 2010;26(1):53–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunbar M, Johnson SR, Rhyan JC, McCollum M. Use of infrared thermography to detect thermographic change in mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) experimentally infected with foot-and-mouth disease. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2009;40:296–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS. The relation between physical properties of the anterior eye and ocular surface temperature. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:197–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ng EYK, Kaw GJL. IR images and fever monitoring devices: physics, physiology, and clinical accuracy. In: Bronizino JD, editor. Medical devices and systems, biomedical engineering handbook. 3rd edition ed. Florida: CRC Press; 2006. p. 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Campbell GS, Norman JM. Radiation basics. In: Introduction An, editor. to Environmental Biophysics. 2nd edition ed. New York: Springer; 1998. p. 147–65.Google Scholar
  30. Mass AM, Supin AY. Adaptative features of aquatic mammals’ eye. Anat Rec. 2007;290:701–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ninomiya H, Yoshida E. Functional anatomy of the ocular circulatory system: vascular corrosion casts of the cetacean eye. Vet Ophthalmol. 2007;10(4):231–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgan PB, Soh MP, Efron N. Potential applications of ocular thermography. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(7):568–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Melero et al. 2015

Advertisement