Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in a surgical intensive care unit: an observational study

BMC Research Notes volume 8, Article number: 491 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is a frequent and life-threatening infection in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of IC and the antifungal susceptibility of etiological agents in patients admitted to our surgical intensive care unit (SICU) in Spain.

Methods

We designed a prospective, observational, single center, population-based study in a SICU. We included all consecutive adult patients (≥18 years old) who had documented IC, either on admission or during their stay, between January 2012 and December 2013.

Results

There were a total of 22 episodes of IC in the 1149 patients admitted during the 24-month study. The overall IC incidence was 19.1 cases per 1000 admissions. Thirteen cases of IC (59.1 %) were intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) and 9 (40.9 %) were candidemias. All cases of IAC were patients with secondary peritonitis and severe sepsis or septic shock. The overall crude mortality rate was 13.6 %; while, it was 33 % in patients with candidemia. All patients with IAC survived, including one patient with concomitant candidemia. The most common species causing IC was Candida albicans (13; 59.1 %) followed by Candida parapsilosis (5; 22.7 %), and Candida glabrata (2; 9.1 %). There was also one case each (4.5 %) of Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis. Thus, the ratio of non-C. albicans (9) to C. albicans (13) was 1:1.4. There was resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole in 13.6 % of cases. Resistance to other antifungals was uncommon.

Conclusions

Candida parapsilosis was the second most common species after C. albicans, indicating the high prevalence of non-C. albicans species in the SICU. Resistance to azoles, particularly fluconazole, should be considered when starting an empirical treatment. Although IAC is a very frequent form of IC in critically ill surgical patients, prompt antifungal therapy and adequate source control appears to lead to a good outcome. However, our results are closely related to our ICU and any generalization must be taken with caution. Therefore, further investigations are needed.

Background

Approximately 15 % of health-care associated infections are caused by fungi and Candida accounts for 70–90 % of all invasive infections. Candida spp. are included in the 10 most common microorganisms causing bloodstream infections (BSI). North American and European studies showed that yeasts belonging to genus Candida ranged from the fourth to tenth most common cause of BSI [1]. On the other hand, 30–40 % of episodes of recurrent gastrointestinal tract perforation or acute necrotizing pancreatitis are complicated by intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) [2]. However, the diagnosis of non-candidemic invasive candidiasis (IC) remains elusive in the majority of patients. In fact, neither the guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America [3] nor the European consensus [4] provided any clarification on IAC; while, epidemiological data over the last decades have shown than non-candidemic IC, which is mostly peritonitis, is a frequent and life-threatening complication in critically ill surgical patients [5]. Due to the poor outcome associated with IC in critically ill patients, an understanding of local epidemiologic trends and the antifungal susceptibility of etiological agents is crucial. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of IC in our surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Additionally, we evaluated in vitro susceptibility of isolates and outcome of IC in our SICU during a 2-year period.

Methods

We designed a prospective, observational, single center study between January 2012 and December 2013. All consecutive adult patients (≥18 years old) who had documented IC, either on admission or during their stay, were enrolled. The local ethics committee (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, INCLIVA) approved the protocol. Informed consent was obtained from patients or their representative.

The definition of IC was the recovery of yeast from blood culture or other normally sterile site. Candidemia was considered to be catheter-related if a catheter tip culture yielded the same yeast isolated in the bloodstream. Candida colonization was considered unifocal when Candida species were isolated from one non-steril site and considered multifocal when Candida species were simultaneously isolated from at least two different non-steril sites, even if two different Candida species were isolated [6]. Corticosteroid treatment was defined as exposure to a 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent for ≥30 days. Adequate source control was defined as removal of any preexisting central vein catheters or documented surgical or radiologic procedures to drain abscesses or other fluid collections thought to be the source of Candida infection within 24 h of the onset of infection. The severity and organ dysfunction at the IC diagnosis were computed by the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [7]. Antifungal treatment was considered adequate if the recommended dose of an antifungal drug was administered within 48 h after sample collection for a susceptible Candida isolate [8], according to the species-specific clinical breakpoint suggested by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) subcommittee [9]. The outcome variables were early (≤7 days) and late (8–30 days) mortality.

Laboratory procedures

Blood specimens and non-centrifuged peritoneal fluids obtained during surgery (one specimen/patient) were directly inoculated into two bottles of BACTEC media (PLUS aerobic/F and PLUS anaerobic/F; BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA), which were incubated for a maximum of 7 days, and analyzed using the automated continuous blood culture monitoring BACTEC FX system (BD Diagnostics). The broth was then sub-cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar with Chloramphenicol (SC) when yeast growth was observed. For colonization purposes, pharyngeal and anal exudates were inoculated in Brain Heart Infusion Broth incubated at 37 °C for 24 or 48 h, and then sub-cultured on SC. Urine specimens were directly streaked onto SC. Cultured yeasts were identified based on the macro-microscopic features of the culture, germ tube test, and biochemical tests (VITEK® 2 system bioMérieux, Inc. Hazelwood, MO, USA or API®/ID 32C bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France).

Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed using Sensititre Yeast One® (TREK Diagnostic Systems Ltd.). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results for all antifungals, except for amphotericin B, were interpreted by taking into account the species-specific clinical breakpoint suggested by the CLSI [9]. In accordance with the literature data, a breakpoint ≤1 μg/ml was selected for amphotericin B to define the isolates as sensitive (S).

Statistical analysis

Continuous normally distributed data are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and compared using unpaired Student’s t test. Non-normally distributed data are expressed as the median and interquartile ranges (IQR) and compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical data are expressed as the number and percentage and compared using χ 2 or the Fisher’s exact tests. In all comparisons, a p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Among 1149 patients consecutively admitted to our ICU during the 24-month survey, 22 patients with IC were identified. The overall IC incidence was 19.1 cases per 1000 admissions. The most common predisposing factors for IC, present at the time of diagnosis, were central venous catheter (CVC) and urinary catheter presence (100 %), followed by antibiotic therapy (95.4 %), mechanical ventilation (90.9 %), ICU stay ≥7 days (68.2 %), and total parenteral nutrition (63.6 %). The median age of the patients was 66 (53.7–74.2) years, with 72.7 % males and 27.3 % females. The admitting diagnosis was surgical in 90.9 % (70 % intra-abdominal) and medical in 9.1 % of cases. The median SOFA score at enrollment was 5 (3–6.2). In 2 cases (9.1 %), IC was already present at ICU admission, while it occurred during the ICU stay in 20 cases (90.9 %), with a median onset time of 20 days (5–37.5).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with invasive candidiasis (IC)
Full size table

Sites of infection and Candida species

Thirteen cases of IC (59.1 %) were IAC and nine (40.9 %) were candidemias. All cases of IAC occurred in patients with secondary peritonitis and severe sepsis or septic shock. All samples of peritoneal fluid were obtained surgically. The Candida species found are reported in Table 2, 13 cases of IC (59.1 %) were caused by Candida albicans (CA) and 9 (40.9 %) by non-Candida albicans (nCA) species (ratio nCA:CA was 1:1.4). Candida parapsilosis was the most prevalent nCA species (5; 22.7 %), followed by Candida glabrata (2; 9.1 %). A multifocal colonization was documented in eight (36.4 %) patients with IC. In 75 % of these cases, there was colonization by the same yeast species isolated from blood or peritoneal fluid. Catheter removal was possible in all patients immediately after the onset of IC, and a tip culture was performed in all cases. Two cases (22.2 %) of candidemia were catheter-related. The duration of candidemia [median (IQR)] was: 7 (9.5–14.5) days (Table 1). In 20 (90.9 %) patients, the infectious process was a mixed infection caused by yeast and bacteria, with Gram-negative bacteria (68 %), especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa (32 %), being most common.

Table 2 Candida species in 22 patients with IC
Full size table

Antifungal susceptibility testing

All isolates were tested for in vitro antifungal susceptibility according to the CLSI breakpoints [9]. The results of antifungal resistance are shown in the Table 3. All isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofungin, and posaconazole; while, 13.6 % of isolates were resistant to fluconazole (C. albicans, 1; C. glabrata, 1; Candida krusei, 1) and itraconazole (C. albicans, 2; C. krusei, 1). In one patient, C. parapsilosis was resistant to anidulafungin and micafungin with a MIC of 4 mg/L for both echinocandins.

Table 3 Antifungal resistances in 22 Candida isolates from patients with IC
Full size table

Treatment

No patient was on antifungal prophylaxis at the time of IC diagnosis. Empirical therapy was started in 100 % of patients within 24 h of the onset of symptoms and the duration was 10 (5.0–16.5) days. The drugs empirically prescribed were echinocandins (86.4 %, 19 patients), followed by fluconazole (13.6 %, 3 patients). In all cases, empirical therapy was confirmed as the target therapy. Eight patients (36.4 %) underwent de-escalation with fluconazole.

Patient outcome

Overall, the crude mortality rate was 13.6 %; while, it was 33.3 % in patients with candidemia (two patients with C. albicans and one patient with C. parapsilosis). All patients with IAC survived, including one patient with concomitant candidemia. Early and late mortality were 9.1 and 4.5 %, respectively. Data on the severity, organ dysfunction, lenght of stay in the SICU and mortality according to the type of IC are shown in the Table 4.

Table 4 Candidemia and intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) group characteristics
Full size table

Discussion

We have reported an overall IC incidence of 19.1 cases per 1000 admissions. This finding is higher than the data reported for Northern Europe (6.7–7.4 cases per 1000 admissions) [10, 11] or Italy (16.5 cases per 1000 admissions) [12] and lower than those reported in other European countries (35.7–54 cases per 1000 admissions) [13, 14]. We found that C. albicans was the leading agent (13 cases; 59.1 %), followed by C. parapsilosis (4 cases; 22.7 %) then C. glabrata (2 cases; 9.1 %). Although C. albicans is still regarded as the most common species [3], there has been an increasing incidence of nCA infections with C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis [15–18]. In our country, a recent multicenter study about candidemias demonstrated an increase in nCA infections in the ICU [19]. Our data confirm this increase and C. parapsilosis was the most common among the nCA species.

It is noteworthy that the resistance to itraconazole and, especially, fluconazole was 13.6 %. However, resistance to echinocandins was low in our patients (Table 3). Only one patient (who survived) with C. parapsilosis was resistant to anidulafungin and micafungin, according to the breakpoints used in our study [9], with a MIC of 4 mg/L for both antifungals. Nonetheless, in this case, anidulafungin was used empirically, improving the signs and symptoms of sepsis immediately after the onset of the treatment. There was clinical and microbiological resolution in the following days and a successful outcome. The MIC values published recently [20] were higher than the MICs used in our study [9], and this might explain the patient’s good clinical response to treatment.

The most frequent IC in our patients was IAC (59.1 %). Previous studies have demonstrated that fungal infections adversely affect the outcome of patients with peritonitis. In fact, isolation of Candida from peritoneal fluid has been associated with high mortality [21, 22]. In IAC, as in candidemias, the delay in the initiation of antifungal therapy is a major determinant of clinical outcome [23, 24]. It is striking that, in our study, all patients with IAC survived. It is likely that the prompt (within 24 h of IC onset) and appropriate antifungal therapy and adequate source control could explain these outcomes. There is sufficient evidence in the literature to support the strategy of early administration of antifungal therapy and adequate source control in patients with IC [8, 25].

In the subgroup of patients with candidemia (n = 9), the CVC was removed in all cases, but the candidemia was catheter-related in only two cases (22.2 %). The mortality rate in candidemic patients was 33.3 % (3 patients). In these patients, candidemia (2 C. albicans, 1 C. parapsilosis) was considered primary, with an unknown origin. In fact, primary candidemia was recently identified as an independent risk factor for mortality in candidemic patients [19].

There are some limitations in our study. First, this is a single center study of a critically ill surgical patient population and our epidemiology cannot be extrapolated to all settings. The second limitation is that the frequency of colonization by Candida species was probably underestimated because surveillance cultures were not systematically screened. Finally, due to the small sample size (n = 22) direct comparisons between the two groups of IC (IAC and candidemia) could not be reliably performed.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed the high prevalence of nCA species in critically ill surgical patients and C. parapsilosis as the most common species after C. albicans. Resistance to azoles, particularly fluconazole, should be considered when starting an empirical treatment. The most common IC was IAC in this study of critically ill surgical patients. Although the isolation of Candida spp. in peritoneal specimens of nosocomial peritonitis has been suggested as an independent risk factor of mortality, all patients with IAC survived in this study. The prompt antifungal therapy and adequate source control in our patients likely explains their good outcome. However, our results just reflect the state of the matter at our ICU and naturally can not be extrapolated to other ICUs. Therefore, further investigation is necessary.

Key points

  • In surgical intensive care patients, the prevalence of non-Candida albicans species has increased in the last few years.

  • Resistance to fluconazole should be considered when initiating an empirical antifungal treatment in critical care surgical patients.

  • Intra-abdominal candidiasis is a very frequent form of invasive candidiasis in the critical care surgical setting.

  • Prompt antifungal therapy and adequate source control might explain the good outcome of our patients with intra-abdominal candidiasis.

  • Additional larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Abbreviations

BSI:

bloodstream infections

CA:

Candida albicans

CLSI:

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute

CVC:

central venous catheter

IAC:

intra-abdominal candidiasis

IC:

invasive candidiasis

IQR:

interquartile range

MIC:

minimum inhibitory concentration

nCA:

non-Candida albicans

SC:

Sabouraud Dextrose Agar with Chloramphenicol

SD:

standard deviation

SICU:

surgical intensive care unit

SOFA:

sequential organ failure assessment

References

  1. Bouza E, Muñoz P. Epidemiology of candidemia in intensive care units. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32(Suppl 2):S87–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tissot F, Lamoth F, Hauser PM, Orasch C, Flückiger U, Siegemund M, Zimmerli S, Calandra T, Bille J, Eggimann P, Marchetti O, Fungal Infection Network of Switzerland (FUNGINOS). β-glucan antigenemia anticipates diagnosis of blood culture-negative intraabdominal candidiasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:1100–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:503–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, Garbino J, Kullberg BJ, Lortholary O, Meersseman W, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bille J, Castagnola E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Donnelly JP, Groll AH, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Jensen HE, Lass-Flörl C, Petrikkos G, Richardson MD, Roilides E, Verweij PE, Viscoli C, Ullmann AJESCMID, ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;2012(Suppl 7):19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Montravers P, Dupont H, Eggimann P. Intra-abdominal candidiasis: the guidelines forgotten non-candidemic invasive candidiasis. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:2226–22230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Galván B, Blanco A, Castro C, Balasini C, Utande-Vázquez A, González de Molina FJ, Blasco-Navalproto MA, López MJ, Charles PE, Martín E, Hernández-Viera MA, Cava Study Group. Usefulness of the “Candida score” for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1624–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kollef M, Micek S, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kumar A. Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: importance of empiric therapy and source control. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1739–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeast; Approved Standard-Third Edition. CLSI document M27- A3. Wayne: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.

  10. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, d’Enfert C, Fagon JY, CandiRea Study Group. Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in France: incidence, molecular diversity, management and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:292–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chalmers CM, Bal AM. Management of fungal infections in the intensive care unit: a survey of UK practice. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:827–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montagna MT, Caggiano G, Lovero G, De Giglio O, Coretti C, Cuna T, Iatta R, Giglio M, Dalfino L, Bruno F, Puntillo F. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infections in the intensive care unit: results of a multicenter Italian survey (AURORA Project). Infection. 2013;41:645–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimopoulos G, Ntziora F, Rachiotis G, Armaganidis A, Falagas ME. Candida albicans versus non-albicans intesive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections: differences in risk factors and outcome. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordá-Marcos R, Alvarez-Lerma F, Jurado M, Palomar M, Nolla-Salas J, León MA, León C, EPCAN Study Group. Risk factors for candidaemia in critically ill patients: a prospective surveillance study. Mycoses. 2007;50:302–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chow JK, Golan Y, Ruthazer R, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y, Lichtenberg D, Chawla V, Young J, Hadley S. Factors associated with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans in the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1206–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leroy O, Gangneux JP, Montravers P, Mira JP, Gouin F, Sollet JP, Carlet J, Reynes J, Rosenheim M, Regnier B, Lortholary O, AmarCand Study Group. Epidemiology, management, and risk factors for death of invasive Candida infections in critical care: a multicenter, prospective, observational study in France (2005–2006). Crit Care Med. 2009;37:612–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nucci M, Queiroz-Telles F, Tobón AM, Restrepo A, Colombo AL. Epidemiology of opportunistic fungal infections in Latin America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:561–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pratikaki M, Platsouka E, Sotiropoulou C, Douka E, Paramythiotou E, Kaltsas P, Kotanidou A, Paniara O, Roussos C, Routsi C. Epidemiology, risk factors for and outcome of candidaemia among non-neutropenic patients in a Greek intensive care unit. Mycoses. 2011;54:154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Puig-Asensio M, Pemán J, Zaragoza R, Garnacho-Montero J, Martín-Mazuelos E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almirante B, Prospective Population Study on Candidemia in Spain (CANDIPOP) Project, Hospital Infection Study Group (GEIH), Medical Mycology Study Group (GEMICOMED) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases. Impact of therapeutic strategies on the prognosis in candidemia in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1423–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: 4th informational supplement. Wayne: CLSI; 2012.

  21. Sandven P, Qvist H, Skovlund E, Giercksy KE, NORGAS Group and the Norwegian Yeast Study Group. Significance of Candida recovered from intraoperative specimens in patients with intra-abdominal perforations. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Montravers P, Dupont H, Gauzit R, Veber B, Auboyer C, Blin P, Hennequin C, Martin C. Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis in intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:646–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dupont H, Paugam-Burtz C, Muller-Serieys C, Fierobe L, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP, Mantz J, Desmonts JM. Predictive factors of mortality due to polymicrobial peritonitis with Candida isolation in peritoneal fluid in critically ill patients. Arch Surg. 2002;137:1341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Sobel JD, Pappas PG, Kullberg BJ, Mycoses Study Group. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(8):110–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

GA conceived of the study, participated in its design, and helped to draft the manuscript. CD, IC, AI, and ER participated in the design of the study. EG, TM, CF, JAC, and RB participated in the analysis and interpretation of data. DN and FJB helped to draft the manuscript and participated in the design and coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Pfizer Spain. We thank Alicia Llombart for her support in the statistical analysis.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests GA received funds for speaking at meetings organized on behalf of Astellas, Gilead, Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD), and Pfizer. GA also received unrestricted research grants from Astellas, MSD, and Pfizer. DN received funds for speaking at meetings organized on behalf of Astellas, MSD, and Pfizer. DN also received unrestricted research grants from Astellas and Pfizer. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain

    Gerardo Aguilar, Carlos Delgado, Ana Izquierdo, Estefanía Gracia, Tania Moreno, Esther Romero, Carlos Ferrando, José A. Carbonell & F. Javier Belda

  2. Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain

    Isabel Corrales, Rafael Borrás & David Navarro

  3. School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 15, 46010, Valencia, Spain

    Rafael Borrás, David Navarro & F. Javier Belda

Authors
  1. Gerardo Aguilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabel Corrales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Izquierdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Estefanía Gracia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tania Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Esther Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carlos Ferrando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. José A. Carbonell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rafael Borrás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. David Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. F. Javier Belda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo Aguilar.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilar, G., Delgado, C., Corrales, I. et al. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in a surgical intensive care unit: an observational study. BMC Res Notes 8, 491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1458-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1458-4

Keywords

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us