Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Increased isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria among TB suspects in Northeastern, Tanzania: public health and diagnostic implications for control programmes

  • Abubakar S. Hoza1, 2Email author,
  • Sayoki G. M. Mfinanga3,
  • Arne C. Rodloff1,
  • Irmgard Moser4 and
  • Brigitte König1
BMC Research Notes20169:109

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1928-3

Received: 27 August 2014

Accepted: 9 February 2016

Published: 17 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasingly reported worldwide associated with human disease. Defining the significance of NTM in settings with endemic tuberculosis (TB) requires the discrimination of NTM from TB in suspect patients. Correct and timely identification of NTM will impact both therapy and epidemiology of TB and TB-like diseases. The present study aimed at determining the frequency and diversity of NTM among TB suspects in northeastern Tanzania.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2012 through January 2013. Seven hundred and forty-four sputum samples were collected from 372 TB suspects. Detection was done by using phenotypic, GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS kits, 16S rRNA and hsp65 gene sequencing for identification of isolates not identified by Hain kits. Binary regression model was used to analyse the predictors of NTM detection.

Results

The prevalence of NTM was 9.7 % of the mycobacterial isolates. Out of 36 patients with confirmed NTM infection, 12 were HIV infected with HIV being a significant predictor of NTM detection (P < 0.001). Co-infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) was found in five patients. Twenty-eight NTM isolates were identified using GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS and eight isolates could not be identified. Identified species included M. gordonae and M. interjectum 6 (16.7 %), M. intracelullare 4 (11.1 %), M. avium spp. and M. fortuitum 2 (5.5 %), M. kansasii, M. lentiflavum, M. simiae, M. celatum, M. marinum 1 (2.8 %) each. Of isolates not identified to subspecies level, we identified M. kumamotonense (2), M. intracellulare/kansasii, M. intermedium/triplex, M. acapulcensis/flavescens, M. stomatepiae, M. colombiense and M. terrae complex (1) each using 16S rRNA sequencing. Additionally, hsp65 gene sequencing identified M. kumamotonense, M. scrofulaceum/M. avium, M. avium, M. flavescens/novocastrense, M. kumamotonense/hiberniae, M. lentiflavum, M. colombiense/M. avium and M. kumamotonense/terrae/hiberniae (1) each. Results of the 16S rRNA and hsp65 gene sequencing were concordant in three and discordant in five isolates not identified by GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS.

Conclusion

NTM infections may play a vital role in causing lung disease and impact management of TB in endemic settings. GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS represents a useful tool to identify clinical NTM infections. However, 16S rRNA gene sequencing should be thought for confirmatory diagnosis of the clinical isolates. Due to the complexity and inconsistence of NTM identification, we recommend diagnosis of NTM infections be centralized by strengthening and setting up quality national and regional infrastructure.

Keywords

Nontuberculous mycobacteriaPeripheral diagnostic centresHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Tanzania

Background

Over the past decades, the prevalence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasingly reported worldwide. However, epidemiological and surveillance data of NTM infections are still limited [1]. Defining the epidemiology of NTM diseases in most resource poor settings like Tanzania is more challenging than its well documented relative Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) [2].

Due to their ubiquitous presence in the environment, exposure to NTM is likely common, as they can colonize the respiratory tract without causing disease such that finding NTM in respiratory secretions does not necessarily have clinical implications in all patients [35]. Differentiating true NTM lung infection from contamination and/or colonization is difficult; hence, the presence of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) positive by microscopy of a respiratory sample or culture poses major diagnostic challenge. Increasingly, NTM are becoming recognized as true pathogens and important causes of human infections [6, 7].

Information on the role, contribution and burden of NTM in aetiology of TB–like syndromes is limited in many sub-Saharan African countries endemic to TB and HIV [810]. Lack of rapid and accurate methods to diagnose AFB positive pulmonary infections due to NTM results in misdiagnosis and mismanagement of pulmonary TB in such settings. Correct and timely identification of NTM is particularly urgent for both therapy and epidemiology, since infections with different mycobacterial species demand different management approaches [11, 12].

Tanzania is among the 22 high burden countries (HBCs) in the world with high prevalence of TB. On average, 61,500 new TB patients are notified annually [13]. Patients with AFB positive sputum or with chest radiographic findings presumptive of active TB, who do not respond to general antimicrobials, are generally assumed positive for TB. As a general guideline, patients are empirically treated with first line anti-TB drugs for 6 months.

Since several TB-like syndromes could also be due to NTM, inconclusive diagnosis of pulmonary TB would result in over-diagnosis of TB and hence miss–management of both TB and NTM infections.

Invention of DNA strip technology (line probe assays) based on reverse hybridization of PCR products to their complementary oligonucleotide probes has revolutionized the diagnosis of NTM. Commercial DNA strip assay kits GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS (Hain Life science GmbH, Nehren, Germany); GenoType® CM/AS for detection of common and additional NTM species have been widely and successfully used as rapid molecular tools in the diagnosis of NTM both in resource poor and developed countries. However, cross–reactivity of DNA probes between mycobacterial species has been reported, leading to incorrect diagnosis and treatment of patients [14, 15]. Use of molecular techniques targeting the 16S rRNA and hsp65 genes have been useful in diagnosis and speciation of NTM, including those which are dead or uncultivable [16].

The objective of the present study was therefore to determine the frequency and diversity of NTM among TB suspects in Northeastern Tanzania using conventional phenotypic methods, GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS kits and 16S rRNA as well as hsp65 gene sequencing.

Our findings suggest that NTM infections may play a vital role in causing lung disease and hence impacting management of TB in endemic settings like Tanzania. Therefore, the need to consider NTM in TB control programmes in such settings is urgent.

Methods

Study settings

The study was conducted in two peripheral diagnostic centres (PDCs) of Ngamiani and Makorora. The centres serve as primary catchment for TB diagnosis in Tanga municipal and two hospitals of Muheza Designated District Hospital (MDDH) and Bombo referral hospital. Tanga is among the top 10 regions with high TB notification in Tanzania with annual TB notification cases for the entire region being about 3852 cases, and the TB prevalence of 217/100,000 and 244/100,000 in urban and rural settings respectively as per national prevalence survey, 2012 [17].

Study design

A cross-sectional study was carried out between November 2012 through January 2013. A total of 744 spot and morning sputum samples were collected from 372 TB suspected patients self–presenting at the PDCs and hospitals. All patients presenting to the diagnostic centre with any of the following symptoms were included: presences of symptoms suggestive of TB for a period of ≥2 weeks, night sweats, fatigue, unexpected loss of weight, and fever. Three sputum samples were collected from patients (one on the spot during the first visit, one early morning and another spot the following morning). Early morning sputa were stored at −20 °C and later transported to the Mycobacteriology laboratory at the University hospital Leipzig, Germany for culture and molecular identification.

Smear microscopy and culture isolation

Direct smear microscopy using Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) or fluorescent stains were performed at the respective study sites by experienced laboratory technicians and the results recorded in accordance to the WHO/IUTLD and National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme (NTLP) guidelines [18, 19].

In Leipzig, all the sputum specimens were processed by the standard N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NALC)-NaOH method [20]. Briefly, 10 ml of 0.5 % N-acetyl-cysteine (NALC) solution was added to each sample, specimens were then incubated at room temperature on a shaker for 20 min, followed by addition of 30 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 6.8 for neutralization and subsequently centrifuged at 3000×g for 20 min. The sediments were resuspended in 1 ml PBS after discarding the supernatant. All the decontamination procedure followed the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) recommendations for the detection of mycobacteria [21].

About 2–3 drops of resuspended specimens were inoculated on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ), Gottsacker, and Coletsos slants (Artelt-ENCLIT GmbH, Germany) supplemented with antibiotics (Polymyxin B (200,000 IU/liter), Amphotericin B (10 mg/liter), Carbenicillin (50 mg/liter), and Trimethoprim (10 mg/liter) (PACT). Cultures were incubated for 8 weeks at 37 °C and read weekly.

Examination and reporting of smear microscopy was performed by fluorescent microscopy. Subsequently, 0.5 ml of each specimen was inoculated into BacT/Alert bottles supplemented with antibiotics PACT and incubated in an automated BacT/Alert 3D System (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) liquid culture system for 8 weeks. Culture not showing any growth after 8 weeks of incubation was considered negative. Positive BacT/Alert bottles were checked for purity by plating a drop from each positive bottle onto blood agar (BA) plate to rule out false positive results due to bacterial contamination and simultaneously ZN stain was performed to confirm presence of AFB positive results.

Phenotypic identification

Slants containing pure cultures of AFB were assessed for growth rate and pigment accumulation on LJ, Gottsacker or Coletsos slants (at 30 °C, 37 °C and 45 °C). NTM isolates were grouped based on Runyon classification and results compared with those of molecular methods.

DNA extraction

Mycobacterial DNA was extracted from heat–inactivated AFB isolates. Briefly, bacteria suspended in 500 µl sterile water or 1 ml directly from positive BacT/Alert bottles were inactivated at 80 °C for 20 min, then ultra-sonicated at 35 kHz and heated at 100 °C for 10 min each treatment and centrifuged at 16,100×g two times for 5 min. The supernatant was taken as template DNA. Genomic DNA of the H37Rv strain and sterile distilled water were used as positive and negative controls respectively for all molecular procedures.

Identification of NTM by GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS assay

All isolates identified as NTM based on their cultural characteristics and confirmed by ZN staining were subjected to further definitive identification using two commercial kits, the GenoType® Mycobacterium CM for detection of common NTM. Isolates not identified by GenoType® CM assay were further tested with the GenoType® AS assay for additional NTM. All the procedures followed manufacturer’s instructions.

DNA sequence analysis

All isolates not identified to the species level by the CM/AS assay were analyzed by 16S rRNA and hsp65 gene sequencing. For sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was done according to [22] using the primers 285 and 264 for generating the PCR product (1037 bp) and primer 271 for sequencing. For hsp65 gene sequencing, PCR was done according to [23] using the primers 21M13TB11/M13TB12 generating a 441 bp fragment. For sequencing, the primer M13/pUC forward was used. The primers were purchased from Jena Bioscience, Jena, Germany. The PCR products were purified for sequencing using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit or alternatively QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was done by GATC Company (Konstanz, Germany). The raw data were analyzed at the FLI using the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST software optimized for highly similar sequences (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Strain identification was based on the BLAST hit with the highest scores combined with greatest sequence coverage and identity. Reference strains with the highest similarity score as present in the NCBI database were used as references for the similarity assessment.

Data analysis

Demographic and clinical data were cleared and analysed by SPSS version 11.5 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) software package. Binary regression model was used to analyse the predictors of NTM isolation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine trend analysis across ordered groups. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS assay results were interpreted based on manufacturers instruction.

Ethical clearance

The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or relatives of the patients, where the patients could not read and write.

Results

A total of 744 sputum samples were collected from 372 TB suspects who self–presented at two PDCs and two hospitals in Tanga, northeastern, Tanzania. The proportion of males 196 (52.7 %) was higher than that of female 176 (47.3 %). The median age of the patients was 40 years (range 7–88 years).

Demographic characteristics of patients and risk factors associated with NTM

Demographic data and risk factors associated with NTM infections are shown in (Tables 1, 2). The overall frequency of the patients with NTM in the study was 9.7 %; HIV positivity was found to be associated with NTM infection among the factors analysed, with a statistical significance of (OR 3.86, 95 % CI [1.79–8.3], P < 0.001). There was no association between NTM and other factors analysed.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics and laboratory findings of the patients with NTM infections stratified by site

Demographic and risk factors

Makorora HC n = 48 (%)

Ngamian HC n = 128 (%)

Bombo RH n = 62 (%)

Muheza DDH n = 134 (%)

Total n = 372

Gender

 Female

20 (41.7)

56 (43.7)

40 (64.5)

60 (44.8)

176

 Male

28 (58.3)

72 (56.3)

22 (35.5)

74 (55.2)

196

 Age: Mean (SD)

45.1 (18.9)

39.4 (17.6)

38.3 (15.6)

42.9 (16.9)

 

Age groups (years)

 <20

1 (2.1)

8 (6.3)

6 (9.7)

6 (4.5)

21

 20–40

13 (27.1)

69 (53.9)

23 (37.1)

51 (38.1)

156

 40–60

22 (45.8)

29 (22.6)

27 (43.5)

57 (42.5)

135

 >60

12 (25.0)

22 (17.2)

6 (9.7)

20 (14.9)

60

Residence

 Urban

39 (81.3)

97 (75.8)

43 (69.4)

28 (20.9)

207

 Rural

9 (18.7)

31 (24.2)

19 (30.6)

106 (79.1)

165

Occupation

 Peasants

24 (50.0)

33 (25.8)

31(50.0)

68 (50.8)

156

 Housewife

11 (22.9)

16 (12.5)

18 (29.0)

24 (17.9)

69

 Business

5 (10.4)

24 (18.8)

5 (8.1)

11 (8.2)

45

 Others

8 (16.7)

55 (42.9)

8 (12.9)

31 (23.1)

102

 Prevalence of MTBC alone

5 (10.4)

29 (22.7)

15 (24.2)

36 (26.9)

85

 Prevalence of NTM alone

5 (10.4)

14 (11.0)

1 (1.6)

11 (8.2)

31

 Prevalence of MTB +NTM

0

3 (3.2)

1 (1.6)

1 (0.7)

5

Concurrent conditions

 HIV + ve

12 (25.0)

14 (10.9)

13 (30.0)

14 (10.4)

53

 HIV − ve

7 (14.6)

87 (68.0)

1 (1.6)

19 (14.2)

114

 Unknown

29 (60.4)

27 (21.1)

48 (77.4)

101 (75.4)

205

Previous TB

 Yes

9 (18.7)

33 (25.8)

1 (1.6)

16 (11.9)

59

 No

39 (81.3)

95 (74.2)

61 (98.4)

118 (88.1)

313

HC health Centre, MDDH Muheza Designated District Hospital, MTBC M. tuberculosis complex, NTM nontuberculous mycobacterium

Table 2

Risk factors associated with NTM infection among suspected TB patients attending PDCs/hospitals in north-eastern, Tanzania from November 2012 to January 2013

 

OR

95 % CI

P value

Gender

0.83

0.42–1.66

0.6

Age

1.02

0.52–2.04

0.95

Location

0.96

0.48–1.9

0.9

Occupation

0.95

0.43–2.1

0.8

HIV positive

3.86

1.79–8.3

0.001*

Previous TB

0.84

0.31–2.26

0.7

OR odd ratio, CI confidence interval

* P value is statistically significant at P < 0.05

Culture Results

Of the 372 patients, positive mycobacterial cultures were obtained in 121 (32.5 %) patients and among these 36 (9.7 %) patients harboured NTM, which are subject of this paper. From each patient three sputum samples were analysed for NTM growth. In total, 101 sputum samples were positive for NTM by culture. In this regard, 29 patients (80.6 %) were positive for NTM growth in all three samples and seven patients (19.4 %) were positive for NTM only in two out of the three samples. NTM without any other coinfections were detected in 21 (58.3 %) patients. NTM coinfection with HIV was found in 11 (30.6 %) patients, with MTBC in three (8.3 %) patients and NTM with both HIV and MTBC coinfections in one (2.8 %) patient. One patient was simultaneously positive for NTM plus Nocardia spp. (data not shown) (Table 3). None of the patients had mixed NTM infections.
Table 3

Comorbidity of NTM with either M.tb and or HIV among individuals with NTMs

Type of infection

No. of individuals (%)

NTM alone

21 (58.3 %)

HIV + NTM

11 (30.6 %)

NTM + M.tb

3 (8.3 %)

HIV + NTM + M.tb

1 (2.8 %)

Total

36

Of the 121 patients, 81 (66.9 %) patients had positive smear microscopy for AFB and 40 (33.1 %) patients were smear negative at the laboratory in Leipzig. On the other hand, of those 121 patients with positive culture results, 64 (52.9 %) patients had positive smear microscopy for AFB and 56 (46.3 %) patients had negative smear microscopy for AFB at local PDCs/hospitals, whereas only one (0.8 %) patient had smear positive AFB at local PDCs/hospitals but negative smear microscopy and culture in Leipzig.

Phenotypic identification of the NTM

Based on their growth characteristics and pigment production, the isolates were grouped into different Runyon groups [24]. Eighteen isolates were classified as scotochromogenic (Runyon II), 13 as nonphotochromogenic (III), 4 as photochromogenic (Runyon I) and 1 as rapid growing mycobacteria (Runyon IV). The results were comparable to the molecular detection by Hain kit results (Table 4).
Table 4

Species distribution of the NTM isolated from PDCs/hospitals in northeastern Tanzania based on Runyon grouping and GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS

Prevalence of NTM infection

Runyon group

n = 36 (%)

Assay

M. gordonae

II

6 (16.7)

GenoType CM

M. interjectum

II

6 (16.7)

GenoType CM

M. intracellulare

III

4 (11.1)

GenoType CM

M. scrofulaceum

II

3 (8.3)

GenoType CM

M. avium spp.

III

2 (5.5)

GenoType CM

M. fortuitum

III

2 (5.5)

GenoType CM

M. kansasii

I

1 (2.8)

GenoType AS

M. lentiflavum

II

1 (2.8)

GenoType AS

M. simiae

I

1 (2.8)

GenoType AS

M. celatum

III

1 (2.8)

GenoType AS

M. marinum

I

1 (2.8)

GenoType AS

NTM not identified

 

8 (22.2)

 

Distribution of mycobacterial isolates by site

Results of genotyping using GenoType® MTBC for the MTC and GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS for NTM isolates at each site showed that the prevalence of M. tuberculosis alone were 10.4, 22.7, 24.2 and 26.9 % at Makorora HC, Ngamiani HC, Bombo RH and MDDH respectively. The prevalence of NTM alone were 10.4, 11.0, 1.6 and 8.2 % at Makorora HC, Ngamiani HC, Bombo RH and MDDH respectively (Table 1).

Identification of NTM isolates GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS

Identification of NTM isolates to species level by GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS kits was achieved in 28 (77.8 %) isolates with GenoType® Mycobacterium CM identifying 23 (63.9 %) of the isolates and GenoType® Mycobacterium AS identifying 5 (13.9 %) isolates. On the other hand, eight (22.2 %) out of 36 isolates could not be identified by either kit. M. gordonae and M. interjectum were the most frequently identified with 6 (16.7 %) isolates each, followed by M. intracellulare 4 (11.1 %), M. scrofulaceum 3 (8.3 %), M. avium spp. 2 (5.5 %), M. fortuitum 2 (5.5 %), M. kansasii 1 (2.8 %), M. lentiflavum 1 (2.8 %), M. simiae 1 (2.8 %), M. celatum 1 (2.8 %) and M. marinum 1 (2.8 %) (Table 4).

16S rRNA gene and hsp65 gene sequencing

Eight isolates not previously identified by the GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS kits were analysed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and additionally by hsp65 gene sequencing. Three of eight species yielded comparable results with both genes while five hsp65 analyses gave results different from 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

16S rRNA gene sequencing for the eight isolates yielded M. kumamotonense (n = 2), M. intracelullare/kansasii, M. intermedium/triplex, M. acapulcensis/favenscens, M. stomatepiae, M. colombiense and M. terrae complex (n = 1). The results with the respective lengths of the sequenced DNA stretches are shown in (Table 5).
Table 5

NTM species identified based on 16S rRNA gene and hsp65 gene sequencing

Strain ID

16S rRNA gene sequencing

Identity/sequence length (bp)

hsp65 gene sequencing

Identity/sequence length (bp)

TZ095

M. kumamotonense

558/559

M. kumamononense

357/357

TZ141

M. intracellulare

922/928

M. scrofulaceum

343/359

M. kansasii

924/928

M. avium complex

343/360

TZ145

M. intermedium

902/916

M. avium complex

300/315

M. triplex

896/916

TZ147

M. acapulcensis

918/918

M. flavescens

369/372

M. flavescens

912/919

M. novocastrense

368/372

TZ149

M. kumamotonense

928/928

M. kumamotonense

356/357

M. hiberniae

382/384

TZ217

M. stomatepiae

570/570

M. lentiflavum

362/372

TZ224

M. colombiense

928/928

M. colombiense

378/385

M. avium complex

376/385

TZ294

M. terrae complex

923/931

M. kumamotonense

368/384

M. terrae

364/384

M. hiberniae

363/384

Discussion

While the epidemiology of TB is well documented, the prevalence and epidemiology of NTM in Tanzania is largely unravelled [25]. NTM pulmonary infections are increasingly reported because of increased populations at-risk due to HIV infection, old age, other immunosuppressive conditions, increased awareness and improved diagnostic facilities especially in developed countries [26, 27].

In Tanzania, the existing supposition is that most individuals presenting with pulmonary symptoms reflecting mycobacterial diseases are infected with MTC. Chances that NTM are missed during diagnosis is to a great extent attributed to poor diagnostic capabilities for culture and identification of NTM, endemic nature of MTC, overburden by diseases like malaria and HIV. Furthermore, lack of awareness among public health personnel and lack of standardized or accepted criteria to properly define and report NTM have all resulted to less attention on the NTM infections.

In this study, the overall frequency of patients with NTM detected by Hain kits among pulmonary TB suspects population was 9.7 %. We identified M. gordonae and M. interjectum with 6 (16.7 %) isolates each accounting for about one-third of all NTM isolates, M. intracelullare 4 (11.1 %), M. avium spp. and M. fortuitum 2 (5.5 %), M. kansasii, M. lentiflavum, M. simiae, M. celatum, M. marinum 1 (2.8 %) isolate each. Additionally, eight isolates, which gave no signal with GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS kits were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These isolates were assigned to the species M. kumamotonense (2), M. intracellulare/kansaii (1), M. intermedium/M. triplex (1), M. acapulcensis/M. flavescens (1), M. stomatepiae (1), M. colombiense (1) and M. terrae (1). Additionally, hsp65 gene sequencing was conducted if the 16S rRNA sequences were not discriminatory in order to confirm especially the ambiguous species assignments. However, only three of eight isolates both genes indicated the same species, for five isolates discordant results were achieved by sequencing both genes (Table 5). Sequencing of different genes used for bacterial species identification may yield inconsistent results. The problem is even more complicated with mycobacteria which are characterized by interspecies similarity clearly higher than in other bacteria [28, 29]. These results emphasise the difficulties of species identification for NTM. Therefore, it is of great importance to standardize the methods in order to generate comparable results between different laboratories, countries and continents.

M. kumamotonense, M. acapulcensis M. novocastrense, M. stomatepiae, and M. hiberniae determined by either 16S rRNA or hsp65 in this study (Table 5) have been reported elsewhere in the world. Some of which have been associated with human diseases and others isolated from the environment [3033]. To the best of our understanding, these species have not previously reported in Tanzania.

Our findings are in agreement with findings from other studies in Tanzania and Africa which indicated increasing prevalence of NTM [9, 34, 35]. Whether there exist geographic variations in the diversity of NTM in Tanzania is not clear since this study focused only on patients residing in a more or less similar geographic location along the northeastern coast of Tanzania.

Understanding the distribution and clinical impact of NTM is of public health significance, as it addresses concerns of over diagnosis of tuberculosis and potential under treatment of NTM infections. As reported previously [35], there exist quite diverse species of NTM among humans, livestock and wildlife [36]; this therefore stresses need to investigate the distribution and clinical impact of different NTM species in Tanzania.

Analysis of the predictors of NTM infection in this study shows lack of association among gender, age, area of residence and occupation in patients diagnosed with NTM. However, need to study NTM infections in TB endemic settings like Tanzania through a larger cohort and evaluation of their impact on TB disease is particularly urgent. Though in the present study we did not perform drug susceptibility testing for the isolated NTM, such patients may erroneously regarded as having MDR isolates.

Immunocompromised individuals due to HIV/AIDS are at a high risk of NTM infections, with M. intracellulare, and M. avium complex (MAC) being frequently reported [3739].

Findings from this study show that individuals with HIV positive status had a varying range of NTM infections and HIV was an important predictor of NTM detection (OR 3.86, 95 % CI [1.79–8.3], p < 0.001). The identified NTM included M. scrofulaceum (2), M. avium spp. (2), M. gordonae (2), M. intracelullare (1), M. lentiflavum (1), M. celatum (1) and M. interjectum (1). Two of the isolates from HIV positive cases, not identified by the Hain kits, were found to belong to M. kumamotonense and M. intracellulare by 16S rRNA sequencing.

MAC and rarely identified species of M. lentiflavum and M. sherrisii were reported among HIV positive patients with pulmonary disease in Zambia and Tanzania [9, 34, 40]. M. sherrisii which was found to be commonly associated with HIV individuals in northern Tanzania [34], was not detected in this patient population. M. celatum commonly isolated from human respiratory tract specimens is also known to be pathogenic to HIV patients and sometimes non–immunocompromised patients [41], whereas, M. gordonae a common contaminant of water supply, soil, casual resident in human sputum and gastric lavage specimens is rarely (e.g. AIDS) if ever implicated in disease processes [41].

NTM co-infections with M. tuberculosis disease are rarely diagnosed owing to overlapping clinical manifestations [10]. Our results show that five (1.3 %) individuals had both M. tuberculosis and NTM which included M. scrofulaceum (2), M. interjectum (1), M. gordonae (1) and one isolate not identified by Hain kits was identified as M. kumamotonense by 16S rRNA sequencing. Although it may be assumed that patients with such co-infections in many cases manifest symptoms mainly due to M. tuberculosis, the role of such co–infections underscore the need for further research to determine their contribution in the disease pathogenesis, severity and progression.

NTMs pose a major challenge for TB treatment programmes since such patients are managed mainly on the basis of smear microscopy which is not suitable to differentiate between MTC and NTM, but also major drawbacks lie on limited sensitivity and specificity of symptoms and radiology [8]. Culture on the other hand, is the gold standard but is time consuming, demands use of different types of media and longer incubation for optimization of growth. Since such elaborate culture algorithms are scarce outside the reference centres, NTMs warrant a special emphasis as possible cause of disease.

Although we cannot certainly conclude whether the isolated NTM merit to be classified as cause of infection/disease in each particular case, a mere presence of NTM in a particular case could make the decision on the diagnosis more complex. Need for public hygiene education is particularly high, since NTM are mostly found in the environment (water, soil). If people exert better hygiene management in their homes and food preparation, animal keeping, water boiling before drinking and so on, the risk of being infected would decrease, especially for persons at risk such as children, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals.

Limitations

A number of factors could have limited our findings. Firstly, lack of preliminary laboratory data on the chronic patients presented limited us from determining whether they had been infected only by an NTM or they primarily had coinfection with M. tuberculosis. Secondly, lack of follow up limits the capacity to establish patients’ outcomes especially with NTM disease in many resource poor settings. Moreover, the true prevalence of NTM can only be assessed through a wider epidemiological study. These findings were communicated to the Medical Research Coordinating Committee where National Tuberculosis Control Program is represented. However, we are not sure if NTLP guided starting of appropriate treatment for NTM since there are no clear national guidelines for management of NTMs. This makes these findings very important as they may serve as baseline data for the NTLP to develop guidelines for management of NTMs.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there is a diverse range of NTM infections, which may play a vital role in causing lung disease and impact the management of TB in TB-endemic settings leading to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment of MDR cases particularly the clinically ‘‘chronic cases’’. This highlights the need to consider NTM when treating patients with putative TB treatment failures. Moreover, fundamental information that meets ATS/IDSA diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of pulmonary NTM is needed to improve the understanding of NTM disease. There is an urgent need of formulating standardized criteria for defining and reporting NTM infections. We recommend that laboratory diagnosis of NTM infections be centralized by strengthening and setting up quality national and regional infrastructure.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ASH and BK participated in designing the study. ASH collected the samples, conducted the experiments, performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript, SGMM participated in data analysis and proof read the manuscript. ACR participated in proof reading the manuscript. IM performed sequence analyses and proofread the manuscript. BK participated in proof reading the manuscript and coordinated the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We wish to extend our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation to Tanga Regional Medical Officer, District Medical Officers, Municipal and District TB co-ordinators in Muheza and Tanga. Our gratitude also goes to all medical officers in charge and laboratory staff of the Ngamiani and Makorora health centres, Bombo and Muheza Designated District hospitals, Ms. Elizabeth Kraftschek, Gesine Kauth, Dr. Joerg Beer for their technical support and Ms. Tigest Alemu for statistical analysis. We acknowledge Ms. Catherine Sweeney—Read for editing the manuscript. This study was carried out with financial support from the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, University of Leipzig
(2)
Sokoine University of Agriculture
(3)
Muhimbili Centre, National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR)
(4)
Federal Research for Animal Health, Friedrich Loeffler Institut

References

  1. Kendall B, Winthrop K. Update on the epidemiology of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;34:087–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Marras TK, Daley CL. Epidemiology of human pulmonary infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23:553–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Olusoji D, Osman E, Adebiyi P, Mourad G, Declarcq E, Bakare R. Nontuberculosis mycobacteria isolates among new and previously treated pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Nigeria. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2011;1(2):113–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Thomson RM. Changing epidemiology of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1576–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Ingen J, Blaak H, de Beer J, de RodaHusman AM, van Soolingen D. Rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria cultured from home tap and shower water. J Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:6017–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Varghese B, Memish Z, Abuljadayel N, Al-Hakeem R, Alrabiah F, Al-Hajoj SA, Small PLC. Emergence of clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections in Saudi Arabia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2234.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu T, Lu C, Hsin-Chih L. Current situations on identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Biomed Lab Sci. 2009;21:1–5.Google Scholar
  8. Maiga M, Siddiqui S, Diallo S, Diarra B, Traoré B, Shea YR, Zelazny AM, Dembele D, Bindongo PP, Goita D, Kassambara H, Hammond AS, Polis MA, Tounkara A, Hozbor DF. Failure to recognize nontuberculous mycobacteria leads to misdiagnosis of chronic pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Buijtels PC, van der Sande MA, de Graaff CS, Parkinson S, Verbrugh HA, Petit PL, van Soolingen D. Nontuberculous mycobacteria, Zambia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:242–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gopinath K, Singh S, Phillips RO. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in TB-endemic countries: are we neglecting the danger? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e615.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ, Winthrop K. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367–416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Heifets L. Mycobacterial infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;25:283–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. WHO: Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Butler WR, O’Connor SP, Yarkus MA, Gross WM. Cross-reactivity of genetic probe for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with newly described species Mycobacterium celatum. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:536–8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lefmann M, Moter A, Schweickert B, Gobel UB. Misidentification of Mycobacterium leprae as Mycobacterium intracellulare by the COBAS AMPLICOR M. intracellulare test. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1928–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Covert TC, Rodgers MR, Reyes AL, StelmaJr GN. Occurrence of nontuberculous mycobacteria in environmental samples. J Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:2492–6.Google Scholar
  17. NTLP: The First National Tuberculosis Prevalence Survey in the United Republic of Tanzania Final Report 2013.Google Scholar
  18. NTLP: Manual of the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme in Tanzania. 5th edn. Dar es Salaam: NTLP; 2006.Google Scholar
  19. WHO/IUATLD. Revised international definitions in tuberculosis control. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5:213–5.Google Scholar
  20. Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public Health Mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory: Atlanta, GA, USA. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control;1985.Google Scholar
  21. Medical Microbiology diagnosis of tuberculosis. Part 32: Detection of mycobacteria by microscopic methods: DIN 58943-32 DIN; 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Philip K, Böttger EC. Species identification of mycobacteria using rDNA sequencing. In: Totowa NJ, editor. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York: Human Press Inc; 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Ringuet H, Akoua-Koffi C, Honore S, Varnerot A, Vincent V, Berche P, Gaillard JL, Pierre-Audigier CJ. hsp65 Sequencing for identification of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:852–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Timpe A, Runyon EH. The relationship of “Atypical” acid-fast bacteria to human disease: a preliminary report. J Lab Clin Med. 1954;44:202–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mfinanga SG, Morkve O, Kazwala RR, Cleavaland S, Sharp MJ, Kunda J, Nilsen R. Mycobacterial adenitis. Role of Mycobacterium bovis, non-tuberculous mycobacteria, HIV infection, and risk factors in Arusha, Tanzania. East Afr Med J. 2004;81:171–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hatta M, Sultan AR, Tandirogang N, Yadi M. Detection and identification of mycobacteria in sputum from suspected tuberculosis patients. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Arend SM, van Soolingen D, Ottenhoff TH. Diagnosis and treatment of lung infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009;15:201–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Devulder G, de Montclos PM, Flandrois JP. A multigene approach to phylogenetic analysis using the genus Mycobacterium as a model. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:293–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tortoli E. Phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: many doubts, few certainties. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:827–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Masaki T, Ohkusu K, Hata H, Fujiwara N, Iihara H, Yamada-Noda M, Nhung PH, Hayashi M, Asano Y, Kawamura Y, Ezaki T. Mycobacterium kumamotonense Sp. Nov. Recovered from clinical specimen and the first isolation report of Mycobacterium arupense in Japan: novel slowly growing, nonchromogenic clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium terrae complex. Microbiol Immunol. 2006;50:889–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Allen DM, Chng HH. Disseminated Mycobacterium flavescens in a probable case of chronic granulomatous disease. J Infect. 1993;26:83–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fusco AdC, Fedrizzi T, Lopes ML, Pecorari M, Oliveira WdC, Giacobazzi E, da Costa JB, de Sanctis V, Batista KL, Bertorelli R, Grottola A, Fabio A, Mariottini A, Ferretti P, di Leva F, Fregni GS, Tagliazucchi S, Rumpianesi F, Jousson O, Segata N, Tortoli E. Characterization of 17 strains belonging to the Mycobacterium simiae complex and description of Mycobacterium paraense sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:656–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Pourahmad F, Cervellione F, Thompson K, Taggart J, Adams A, Richards R. Mycobacterium stomatepiae sp. nov, a slowly growing, non-chromogenic species isolated from fish. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:2821–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Crump JA, van Ingen J, Morrissey AB, Boeree MJ, Mavura DR, Swai B, Thielman NM, Bartlett JA, Grossman H, Maro VP, van Soolingen D. Invasive disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria, Tanzania. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:53–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Katale BZ, Mbugi EV, Botha L, Keyyu JD, Kendall S, Dockrell HM, Michel AL, Kazwala RR, Rweyemamu MM, Helden PV, Matee MI. Species diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans, livestock and wildlife in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mwakapuja RS, Makondo ZE, Malakalinga J, Bryssinckx W, Mdegela RH, Moser I, Kazwala RR, Tanner M. Prevalence and significant geospatial clusters of bovine tuberculosis infection at livestock-wildlife interface ecosystem in Eastern Tanzania. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013;45:1223–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Karakousis PC, Moore RD, Chaisson RE. Mycobacterium avium complex in patients with HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:557–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Katoch VM. Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Indian J Med Res. 2004;120(4):290–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawn SD, Bekker L, Miller RF. Immune reconstitution disease associated with mycobacterial infections in HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretrovirals. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:361–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Buijtels PCAM, van der Sande MAB, Parkinson S, Verbrugh HA, Petit PLC, van Soolingen D. Isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria at three rural settings in Zambia; a pilot study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1142–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dostal S, Richter E, Harmsen D. Concise guide to mycobacteria and their molecular differentiation. 1st ed. Würzburg: Ridom Press; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Hoza et al. 2016

Advertisement