Open Access

HIV-1 genetic diversity and primary drug resistance mutations before large-scale access to antiretroviral therapy, Republic of Congo

  • Fabien Roch Niama1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Nicole Vidal4,
  • Halimatou Diop-Ndiaye2,
  • Etienne Nguimbi1,
  • Gabriel Ahombo3,
  • Philippe Diakabana3,
  • Édith Sophie Bayonne Kombo5,
  • Pembe Issamou Mayengue1, 3,
  • Simon-Charles Kobawila3,
  • Henri Joseph Parra1 and
  • Coumba Toure-Kane2
BMC Research Notes201710:243

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2550-8

Received: 1 February 2016

Accepted: 19 June 2017

Published: 5 July 2017

Abstract

Background

In this work, we investigated the genetic diversity of HIV-1 and the presence of mutations conferring antiretroviral drug resistance in 50 drug-naïve infected persons in the Republic of Congo (RoC). Samples were obtained before large-scale access to HAART in 2002 and 2004.

Methods

To assess the HIV-1 genetic recombination, the sequencing of the pol gene encoding a protease and partial reverse transcriptase was performed and analyzed with updated references, including newly characterized CRFs. The assessment of drug resistance was conducted according to the WHO protocol.

Results

Among the 50 samples analyzed for the pol gene, 50% were classified as intersubtype recombinants, charring complex structures inside the pol fragment. Five samples could not be classified (noted U). The most prevalent subtypes were G with 10 isolates and D with 11 isolates. One isolate of A, J, H, CRF05, CRF18 and CRF37 were also found. Two samples (4%) harboring the mutations M230L and Y181C associated with the TAMs M41L and T215Y, respectively, were found.

Conclusion

This first study in the RoC, based on WHO classification, shows that the threshold of transmitted drug resistance before large-scale access to antiretroviral therapy is 4%.

Keywords

HIV Subtypes Recombination Drugs resistances Congo

Background

A broad range of phylogenetic analyses of many isolates from various areas around the world revealed four groups of HIV-1: M, N, O and P [1]. Group M, which is more responsible for the global epidemic, is subdivided into subtypes (A–D, F–H, J and K), sub-subtypes (A1/A2/A3/A4, B/D, F1/F2), unique recombinant forms (URFs) and 71 circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) [2]. Several studies have indicated that the global distribution of HIV-1 subtypes is very heterogeneous, and some difference has been reported between continents and within countries, especially in central Africa, where the highest genetic subtype diversity has been found [3]. HIV diversity has been attributed to the error-prone nature of the reverse transcriptase (RT), which causes a high mutation rate and rapid turnover and generates frequent recombination between viral genomic RNA strands during their transcription into DNA [4, 5]. Furthermore, it was reported that the proportion of the recombinant virus CRFs and URFs are spreading and now play an important role in the global pandemic. Indeed, the prevalence of these viruses displaying designation of different subtypes in gag and env genes varies from less than 10 to 40%, depending on the country and population being studied [6]. In the neighbouring Congo countries, such as Cameroon, several subtypes of URFs and CRFs are co-circulating [2]. The CRF02_AG is more representative in many areas of the country and represents more than 65% of the isolates [7]. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), this rate changes between 32.9 and 59.3% [6, 7]. Previous reports showed the high genetic diversity concerning the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes in the Republic of Congo. The subtypes A, G and D predominate, but approximately 20–27% of strains circulating in the country are recombinants [7, 8] and 6.25% of strains remain unclassified.

Since 1986, in previously reported AIDS cases, the HIV epidemic has been rapidly spreading throughout the Republic of Congo (RoC) and becoming one of the most prevalent in west–central Africa. Based on a national second-generation survey performed in 2009, it was estimated that 3.2% of the population is infected. Approximately 30,000 people living with HIV/AIDS were in urgent need of antiretroviral therapy. To control the epidemic, the government of RoC has developed a national program to provide HAART (high antiretroviral therapy) since the end of 2003. Currently, approximately 21,000 people receive HAART, and 98% live in Brazzaville and Pointe-noire.

The present study aimed to contribute to the knowledge of the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes and recombinants in Congo-Brazzaville and to assess the presence of drug-resistance-related mutations in antiretroviral drug-naïve patients isolated before Initiative Congolaise d’Accès aux Antiretroviraux (ICAARV).

Methods

Fifty blood samples from patients with evident signs of AIDS or following voluntary testing were obtained from the teaching hospital at Brazzaville (n = 48) and the regional hospitals at Pointe-Noire (n = 1) and Gamboma (n = 1) from 2002 to 2004.

HIV diagnosis, the algorithm used to confirm the HIV/AIDS infection, and DNA extractions from uncultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were previously described [9]. A nested-PCR protocol was used to obtain information on approximately 1865 bp of the pol gene fragment encompassing the protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) regions using the Expand Long Template PCR system (Roche) with previously described primers [10]. PCR products were purified using a Qiaquik gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Courbeouf, France), and direct sequencing was conducted with primers encompassing the pol region. Cycle sequencing was performed by fluorescent Dye Terminator chemistry (BDTv3.1, Applied Biosystems) per the manufacturer. Sequences were collected with an automatic genetic analyzer (3100 Avant, Applied Biosystems). Corrections and contig reconstitutions were made with SeqScape software (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were aligned under the CLUSTAL X program with the reference sequences representing the overall HIV-1 group M genetic diversity observed in Central Africa. We included all pure subtypes and the tentative subtype L variant. We also included all the sub-subtypes and reference strains for all the CRFs available in the databases and documented in Africa (CRF01, 02, 04, 05, 06, 09, 11, 13, 18, 19, 27, 28, 36, 37, and 45). Moreover, we also added other sequences of unique recombinants from DRC (MAL and NOGIL with Accession Numbers X04415 and AJ237565.1). Phylogenetic trees were generated by the neighbour-joining (NJ) method, and the reliability of the branching patterns was assessed using the bootstrap approach (confidence value for individual branch of the resulting trees evaluated with 100 bootstrap replicates). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted first for each new sequence individually. To clearly identify whether a sequence belonged to a subgroup corresponding to a CRF within a specific subtype, all HIV-1 variants, including CRFs and URFs circulating in West and Central Africa, were considered in each individual tree.

In order to confirm clusters, trees were constructed for each group of new sequences that were thought to cluster together. Finally, a general tree was made with all the sequences. As the inclusion of all sequences significantly decreased bootstrap values for certain subtypes/CRFs due to the high intra-subtype/CRF diversity; the general tree was drawn with the minimal number of references, i.e., excluding those that were not represented in this study. The clustering of each new sequence should be concordant among all the trees.

To obtain more detail about ​​recombining strains of HIV-1 circulating in the Congo, the same samples previously analyzed in the env region (V3–V5 loop) and gag (p24) were re-analyzed and compared to subtype designation in the pol gene to reflect new strains recently described.

To determine whether the viruses were recombinants, several additional analyses were performed using the Simplot version 3.5.1 software (http://www.med.jhu.edu/deptmed/sray). The percentage of similarity plots was revealed between the query group and selected groups of sequences by moving 350 nucleotides along the pol alignment with 20 base pair increments. The Simplot software also performed bootscanning on NJ trees using the same window and increment size and 100 replicates for each phylogeny.

The strain or sequence fragments that did not cluster with any of the known subtypes, CRFs or URFs, were submitted to a blast analysis on the Los Alamos and GenBank databases (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence.basis_blast/basis_blast.html) to determine whether they were related to previously described unknown fragments of other HIV-1 strains. Sequences were also analyzed for the presence of major and minor mutations in protease and reverse transcriptase genes at positions known to be associated with ARV resistance. Resistance mutations were identified using the Stanford Calibrated Population Resistance Tool [11], and samples were considered to be resistant if they contained one or more mutations as defined by the Bennett WHO list of transmitted resistance [12]. The new Congolese sequences have been deposited in EMBL for pol sequences, and the accession numbers are as follows: FM164884-FM164933.

Ethical considerations

At the time of sample collection, there was no ethics committee in the country and the retrospective ethics approval was not possible to obtain. However, all of the patients were treated with the same medication. Treatments were forwarded to the doctors for additional follow-up. All patients have given their written or verbal consent in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. No patient who did not agree to participate in the survey was discriminated. The identity of the participants was not shared throughout the process. Measures to ensure the safety of the phlebotomist and patients, such as wearing gloves, disinfection of the area to be punctured, have been ensured.

Results

The characteristics of the studied population were as follows: the mean age was 34 years ranging from 4 to 49. In all, 64% of the samples were obtained from women, and the main route of transmission was heterosexual contact. The WHO clinical classification showed that the majority of these patients (44%) were at stage 3, followed by stage 1 (26%), stage 4 (14%) and stage 2 (10%). In all, 6% of patients had no known disease stages.

Genetic diversity analysis

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic tree analysis of the 50 newly sequenced pol samples from the Congo against the reference strains for the corresponding HIV-1 variants over 1264 unambiguously aligned nucleotides, as indicated upstream. A great genetic diversity was observed, with a predominance of the A and G subtypes (n = 14, 28% and n = 10, 20%, respectively) followed by the D subtype (n = 8, 16%). A consequent number of samples (n = 9, 18%) could not be subtyped and were therefore designated U (undetermined). Among them, 8% were closely related to each other and tightly clustered with the two unique recombinants MAL and NOGIL that shared the same structure in that part of the genome (noted U*). Three samples (6%) were representative of the rare J subtype, and we found one strain (2%) of each of the subtypes F and H and of the circulating recombinants CRF05, CRF13, and CRF18, as well as CRF37.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic relationships of 1800 unambiguously aligned nucleotide sequences representing the partial pol gene. Sequences were aligned with HIV-1 subtype/CRF reference sequences, and the phylogenetic trees were constructed with the neighbor-joining method implemented with the Clustal Program. Reference strains are in black and samples in grey. The recombined strains are indicated with an asterisk

Each of the new strains was submitted in Simplot and subjected to bootscan analysis as previously described. The main result was that 50% of the new strains were recombinants in pol, as indicated with an asterisk at the top of each branch. Figure 2 illustrates in detail the structure of the mosaic sequences and the definitive distribution of the pol HIV-1 variants in Congo. In fact, the major changes in the range of recombinants were caused by the A subtype samples and the undetermined strains. Among 14 subtypes of A sequences, only one was a wild-type A subtype. Other strains were recombinants with unknown fragments or fragments linked to A3, G, CRF02 or CRF37 HIV-1 variants. Interestingly, we found that four new strains shared the same structure (CRF37/A/CRF37), and two of these sequences had the same recombination breakpoints. As a consequence, the real prevalence of A subtypes in this study decreased from 28 to 2%. From the undetermined Congolese strains, one (subtype D in gag and env) seemed to be recombinant, and another involved three different variant fragments (G/H/U). All other undetermined sequences were constituted with two (02) different HIV-1 subtypes (one H/F, two identical G/H, and four identical U/K corresponding to the mosaic structure of the old MAL and NOGIL URFs). The ten G and eight D subtype congolese strains each accounted for one more recombinant strain (G/U/G and U/D, respectively), and one of the three J subtype strains was a mosaic J/G.
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the mosaic pol sequences. The bootstrap values supporting the subtype assignments in the subregion trees were all above 80%

Unidentified strains were submitted to a blast analysis, as indicated earlier, to determine whether they may be linked to other previously published HIV-1 strains. We found that the four strains clustering together with MAL and NOGIL viruses (U*) have several other representatives in the DRC, (97CD.MBFE185, 97CD.MBS3010, 02CD.KP061, 02CD.KP0976) and in Senegal (98SN.40HALD) [10]. A neighbour-joining tree of the same pol fragment expressing protease and RT revealed that all these strains clustered together with 100% bootstrap. Subsequent simplot and bootscan analyses confirmed that they shared the same recombinant U/K structure in that fragment. The recombinant G strain from Congo clustered with 100% bootstrap supports 2 previously published strains from the DRC 97CD.EQS39 [10] and 02CD.KS108 [6] inside the G subtype branch. Again, subsequent simplot and bootscan analyses revealed the same mosaic G/U/G structure for the 3 strains with similar breakpoints locations. Other undetermined strains of Congo, particularly the mosaic CRF37/A/CRF37 viruses, were also tested against comparable recombinant strains found in DRC and Cameroon. We did not observe any clear clustering or similar breakpoints; however, the structure of these strains involved the same subtypes/CRFs.

The majority of these new Congolese strains had also been previously sequenced in the p24 region of the gag gene and/or in the V3–V5 region of the env gene, as published by Niama et al. [9]. When this study was conducted, several HIV-1 variants were not yet described, and we have analyzed again all sequences, including more recently described subtypes and CRFs. The subtype distribution was globally confirmed and remained dominated by the subtypes G, A and D (Table 1). However, previously, subtyped A strains strongly clustered with the CRF37 reference in the gag region confirmed that these strains were circulating in central Africa and in the country. In the present study, among 50 analyzed samples, only two subtype G and one subtype D strains were not sequenced in either gag or env. Six samples were subtyped in one of the regions, and 41 samples were available in gag, pol, and env. Eight strains that were non mosaïc in pol did not display the same subtype/CRF in the other sequenced regions, leading to a global prevalence of 66% recombinant strains. The CRF13 strain was found to be of subtype A in env; the CRF37 in pol and gag was CRF19 in env; two G subtypes in gag and pol were either A or CRF06 in env; one G subtype in pol was J in gag and env; the two J subtypes in pol involved either D, H or G in the other regions; and the non-mosaic undetermined strain was subtype D in gag and env. Interestingly, 3 of the 4 pol recombinants CRF37/A/CRF37 were CRF37 in gag and A in env, and 2 of the 4 undetermined U* pol sequences were forming a specific A cluster in gag p24 and in the V3–V5 env regions. These findings suggested that the majority of HIV-1 strains circulating in the Republic of Congo display a complex mosaic structure.
Table 1

Genetic subtypes in the gag p24 env V3–V5 and pol (Pr and RT) regions

gag subtype

N

env subtype

N

pol subtype

N

A

1

A

1

A

1

A

1

A

1

A3/A

1

A

1

A

1

G/A/G/A

1

A

1

A

1

U/K

1

A

1

A

1

CRF37/A/CRF37

1

A

1

CRF01

1

U/A

1

A

1

J

1

CRF37/U (GJ)

1

A3

1

CRF06

1

CRF02/A

1

CRF05

1

F1

1

CRF05

1

CRF18

1

A

1

A/CRF37

1

CRF18

1

CRF18

1

CRF18

1

CRF18

1

CRF18

1

G/A

1

CRF18

1

U

1

G/H/U

1

CRF37

1

A

1

CRF37/A/CRF37

2

CRF37

1

CRF19

1

CRF37

1

CRF37

1

U

1

CRF37/A/CRF37

1

D (D and D’)

5

D

6

D

4

D (D and D’)

1

D

1

U

1

D (D and D’)

1

D

1

U/D

1

D (D and D’)

1

U

1

D

1

F2

1

ND

1

F2/F (F not F1, not F2)

1

G

1

A

1

G

1

G

1

CRF06

1

G

1

G

1

G

1

G

3

G

1

U

1

G/H

1

G

1

H

1

G/H

1

G

1

ND

1

G/U/G

1

G

1

ND

1

J

1

G

1

ND

1

A/CRF37

1

G

1

ND

1

G

1

G

1

ND

1

U/K

1

H

1

H

1

H

1

J

1

J

1

G

1

J

1

U

1

J/G

1

J

1

ND

1

G

1

ND

3

A

1

CRF13

1

ND

1

C

1

U/A

1

ND

1

D

1

J

1

ND

1

ND

2

D

1

ND

1

ND

1

G

1

ND

1

ND

1

G/U/G

1

U

1

F1

1

H/F

1

U

1

A

1

U/K

1

U*

1

A

1

U/K

1

ND not done, n number of sequences

* Strains clustering with MAL and NOGIL viruses

Antiretroviral resistance

Analysis of the protease (Prot) gene showed no major mutations associated with the resistance to Protease Inhibitor resistance. However, polymorphisms, which were naturally occurring amino acids changing at sites associated with resistance, were also observed, and all samples carried more than 5 of these secondary mutations. The most frequent were scored at positions M36 (90%), H69 (82%), I13 (80%), K20 (48%), L63 (46%), E35 (44%), V82 (28%), I62 (24%), L10 (20%), and V77 (12%). Regarding the reverse transcriptase segment, the following resistance-related mutation, M230L (n = 1, 2%), which is associated with a high level of resistance to delavirdine and nevirapine and causes an intermediate resistance to efavirenz and etravirine, was observed in one sample from Pointe-noire (CgAS23) involving the genomic complex structure gagCRF37/envA/polCRF37/A/CRF37. In addition, one sample (CgCHU38) from a patient attending the Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Brazzaville (CHU-B) and subtyped as G in all 3 regions has the mutations Y181C, M41L and T215Y. Other minor mutations were also found, and the most prevalent were at positions V35 (98%), D177 (76%), V60 (62%), Q174 (58%), D123 (50%), T39 (48%), V135 (34%), K173 (33%), K13R (26%), D121 (24%) and other less prevalent mutations.

Discussion

The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of strains resistant to anti-retroviral drugs in untreated HIV-1 infected patients selected in the Republic of Congo and to contribute to the HIV-1 genetic diversity. Phylogenetic analyses of protease and RT in the pol gene confirmed the strain distributions previously observed in the gag (p24) and env (v3–v5) regions [9]. Surprisingly, the subtype A, which was one of the most important HIV-1 circulating subtypes in Congo (56.25% in 2004 [7] and 36.5% in gag in 2006 [8]), represents now only 2% (1 strain). This weak proportion can be explained by the fact that the majority of strains (13 of 14) classified as A in the pol gene were revealed to be recombinants in the bootscan analysis. This tendency for the recombination of subtype A has been highlighted in previous studies in 2006. It was reported that one of these three subtypes, found as A in gag, were recombinants in the env regions [9]. In neighbouring countries such as DRC, it was found that 70% of strains that classified as A in env (V3–V5) displayed different subtypes in pol. In Cameroon, the recombinant CFR02_AG located in “group” A were predominant [13].

Another important feature of the genetic diversity in Congo was the high proportion of strains that could not be classified into the current subtypes/CRFs and the extremely high frequency of recombinant strains (66%). This proportion appears to be higher than those previously reported in the country: in 2004 and 2006 [8, 9], it was found that 27 and 20% of the virus, respectively, displayed different subtype/CRF designations. In DRC, the proportion of recombinant strains in the pol/env genomic region was 42% in 2002 [6]. In Angola, 47.1% of strains were recombinant [14]. The importance of recombination events may depend on the number of studied regions. In the present study, three different regions were available, and the conditions for detecting more recombination were present.

This study provides additional knowledge of the baseline pattern of HIV-1 transmission of strains harboring the major drug resistance mutations just before the large-scale implementation of ICAARV. No major resistance associated to the protease inhibitors was found. However, many polymorphisms were noted. The majority of our population was at stage 3 or 4 according to the WHO classification. The advanced AIDS stage could explain the absence of major mutations associated with resistance to the anti-protease drug according to the previous study of Wensing et al. [15]. An important polymorphism of the protease gene was also observed that could affect the viral fitness or predict the viruses to be of potentially greater risk of virological failure during protease inhibitor (PI) therapy [16]. For the RT genomic region, the mutations Y215C and M230N were observed at Brazzaville and Pointe-noire, respectively. These mutations are strongly associated with a high level of resistance to the INNRTI. One sample obtained at Hopital Adolphe Cissé de Pointe-Noire (gagCRF37/envA/polCRF37/A/CRF37) was female, but previous history of nevirapine drug use, i.e., through the Mother to Children Transmitted program (MTCT), was not documented. Additionally, the sample harboring the mutation T215Y and the TAMs M41L and Y181C sampled at the CHU de Brazzaville (subtype G) was male, but the transmission of these HIV-1 mutations from nevirapine-exposed patients can be suspected.

Finally, the global prevalence of transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 strains in our study can be estimated as 4%. However, according to Palma et al. [17] this prevalence might be underestimated. Indeed, it is hypothesized that in the absence of drug selective pressure, some transmitted drug-resistance mutations may revert to wild type. The prevalence of drug resistance in Congo is lower than those generally reported in Europe where subtype B dominates. Indeed, in Portugal [17] in 2007, Palma AC et al. found that 7.78% of the newly diagnosed patients were infected by the strains harboring the mutations conferring resistance to one or three drug classes. In Greece, 9% of resistant HIV-1 strains were found in the primary diagnosis patients [18]. Similar studies conducted in Bulgaria by Santoro et al. [19], and in Luxemburg by Schmit in 2000 [20] showed that 9.1 and 13% of strains, respectively, were naturally resistant to certain anti-retroviral molecules. Our data do not differ significantly from those reported by Kousiappa in 2009 [21] and by Juhász E in 2008 [22] where 2.7 and 3.5%, respectively, of resistance to HIV-1 drugs were found in Cyprus and Hungary. In Asia, the lowest prevalence of transmitted drugs was reported. Indeed, in recent studies conducted in Cambodia and Vietnam, 1.49 and 2.6% of resistant strains were reported, respectively [23, 24]. In South Korea, the prevalence of drug-resistant HIV-1 in ART-naive patients was estimated at 12% in a recent study [25]. The studies conducted in Africa with samples obtained from persons not experiencing the HAART treatment showed globally a weak prevalence of the wild strains harboring such mutations. Studies in Ethiopia [26], Burundi [27], Swaziland [28], Kenya [29] and Rwanda [30] showed prevalence of 2.2, 0.5, <5%, 3.2 and 3.6%, respectively. In Mozambique, the rate of transmitted drug was lower in Maputo, the capital city (<5%) and more than 5% in Beira [31]. A high level of drug resistance was reported in Mozambique [31]. In neighbouring countries like Angola, a study conducted in different areas of the country revealed “an unexpected high frequency of DRM to RT inhibitors (16.3%) in patients who have reported no antiretroviral usage.”

Conclusion

In the present work, we showed that the high genetic diversity of HIV-1 strains isolated in the Republic of Congo was confirmed, and the majority of these harbored a complex genomic structure. The prevalence of drug resistance cases of 4% might presage the eventual spread of drug-resistant HIV in the general population. Thus, continuous monitoring of treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected populations 15 years after the implementation of the governmental initiative to provide therapy should be considered.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

FRN, CTK, and HDN conceived and designed the study, organized the data collection and finalized the manuscript. FRN, NV, and KSB drafted the manuscript. IMP and PD participated in the design of the study; NV, SCK and GA interpreted the results and reviewed the final drafts of the manuscript; HJP and CTK coordinated the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants for their time and trust and Dr Martine Peeters for sequence analysis and Dr. Christ Aimé KAYAT for reviewing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data set of this article and the conclusions of this study are included in the article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

At the time of sample collection, there was no ethics committee in the country and the retrospective ethics approval was not possible to obtain. However, all of the patients were treated with the same medication. Treatments were forwarded to the doctors for additional follow-up. All patients have given their written consent in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. No patient who did not agree to participate in the survey was discriminated. The identity of the participants was not shared throughout the process. Measures to ensure the safety of the phlebotomist and patients, such as wearing gloves, disinfection of the area to be punctured, have been ensured.

Funding

This work was granted by ANRS 1215 from the “Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA” (ANRS).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire National de Santé Publique, Unité de Biologie Moléculaire
(2)
Laboratoire de Bactériologie et Virologie, Hôpital Le Dantec
(3)
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Marien Ngouabi
(4)
IRD_UMI 233 TransVIHMI
(5)
Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université Marien Ngouabi

References

  1. Plantier JC, Leoz M, Dickerson JE, De Oliveira F, Cordonnier F, Lemée V, Damond F, Robertson DL, Simon F. A new human immunodeficiency virus derived from gorillas. Nat Med. 2009;15:871–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pessôa R, Watanabe JT, Calabria P, Felix AC, Loureiro P, Sabino EC, Busch MP, et al. Deep sequencing of HIV-1 near full-length proviral genomes identifies high rates of BF1 recombinants including two novel circulating recombinant forms (CRF) 70_BF1 and a disseminating 71_BF1 among blood donors in pernambuco, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e112674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112674.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Peeters M, Sharp PM. Genetic diversity of HIV-1: the moving target. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 3):S129–40 (Review).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Perelson AS, Neumann AU, Markowitz M, Leonard JM, Ho DD. HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: virion clearance rate, infected cell life-span, and viral generation time. Science. 1996;271:15821586.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Clavel F, Hoggan MD, Willey RL, Strebel K, Martin MA, Repaske R. Genetic recombination of human immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 1989;63(3):1455–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Vidal N, Mulanga C, Bazepeo SE, et al. HIV type 1 pol gene diversity and antiretroviral drug resistance mutations in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2006;22(2):202–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kita K, Ndembi N, Ekwalanga M, et al. Genetic diversity of HIV type 1 in Likasi, southeast of the Democratic Republic of Congo. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2004;20(12):1352–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bikandou B, Ndoundou-Nkodia MY, Niama FR, et al. Genetic subtyping of gag and env regions of HIV type 1 isolates in Republic of Congo. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2004;20(9):1005–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Niama FR, Toure-Kane C, Vidal N, et al. HIV-1 subtypes and recombinants in the Republic of Congo. Infect Genet Evol. 2006;6(5):337–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vergne L, Peeters M, Mpoudi-Ngole E, Bourgeois A, Liegeois F, Toure-Kane C, Mboup S, Mulanga-Kabeya C, Saman E, Jourdan J, Reynes J, Delaporte E. Genetic diversity of protease and reverse transcriptase sequences in non-subtype-B human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains: evidence of many minor drug resistance mutations in treatment-naive patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(11):3919–25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1608–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennett DE, Camacho RJ, Otelea D, Kuritzkes DR, Fleury H, et al. Drug resistance mutations for surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug-resistance: update. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004724 (Epub 2009 Mar 6).View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tongo M, Dorfman JR, Martin DP. High degree of HIV-1 group M (HIV-1M) genetic diversity within circulating recombinant forms: insight into the early events of HIV-1M evolution. J Virol. 2015;90(5):2221–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bártolo I, Zakovic S, Martin F, Palladino C, Carvalho P, et al. HIV-1 diversity, transmission dynamics and primary drug resistance in Angola. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e113626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113626.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Wensing AM, Block CA. Worldwide transmission of drug-resistant HIV. AIDS Rev. 2003;5(3):140–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson VA, Brun-Vezinet F, Clotet B, Conway B, Kuritzkes DR, Pillay D, Schapiro JM, Telenti A, Richman DD. Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1: Fall 2005. Top HIV Med. 2005;13(4):125–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Palma AC, Araújo F, Duque V, et al. Molecular epidemiology and prevalence of drug resistance-associated mutations in newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients in Portugal. Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7(3):391–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Paraskevis D, Magiorkinis E, Katsoulidou A, et al. Prevalence of resistance-associated mutations in newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients in Greece. Virus Res. 2005;112(1–2):115–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Santoro MM, Ciccozzi M. Alteri C, and al. Characterization of drug-resistance mutations in HIV type 1 isolates from drug-naive and ARV-treated patients in Bulgaria. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2008;24(9):1133–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmit JC, Lambert C, Fountain E, et al. High incidence of genetic drug resistance markers in newly diagnosed patients in Luxemburg HIV cohort. In: Abstract on the six international one drug therapy in HIV infection Glasgow UK, 2002. ABSTRACT. P225.Google Scholar
  21. Kousiappa I, van de Vijver DA, Demetriades I, Kostrikis LG. Genetic analysis of HIV type 1 strains from newly infected untreated patients in cyprus: high genetic diversity and low prevalence of drug resistance. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2009;25(1):23–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Juhász E, Ghidán A, Kemény B, Nagy K. Emergence of antiretroviral drug resistance in therapy-naive HIV infected patients in Hungary. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2008;55(4):383–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Janin N, Sopheak N, Regis MP, et al. Low prevalence of drug resistance transmitted virus in HIV Type 1-infected ARV-naive patients in Cambodia. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2009;25(5):543–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishizaki A, Cuong NH, Thuc PV, et al. Profile of HIV type 1 infection and genotypic resistance mutations to antiretroviral drugs in treatment-naive HIV type 1-infected individuals in Hai Phong, Viet Nam. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2009;25(2):175–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim MH, Song JE, Ahn JY, Kim YC, et al. HIV antiretroviral resistance mutations among antiretroviral treatment-naïve and -experienced patients in South Korea. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2013;29(12):1617–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kassu A, Fujino M, Matsuda M, Nishizawa M, Ota F, Sugiura W. Molecular epidemiology of HIV type 1 in treatment-naive patients in north Ethiopia. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2007;23(4):564–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vidal N, Niyongabo T, Nduwimana J, et al. HIV type 1 diversity and antiretroviral drug resistance mutations in Burundi. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2007;23(1):175–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Maphalala G, Okello V, Mndzebele S, Gwebu P, Mulima N, Dlamini S, Nhlabatsi B, Ginindza T, Ghebrenegus Y, Ntilivamunda A, Mwanyumba F, Ledwaba J, Pillay V, Bennett DE, Maphalala G, Okello V, Mndzebele S, et al. Surveillance of transmitted HIV drug resistance in the Manzini–Mbabane corridor, Swaziland, in 2006. Antivir Ther. 2008;13(Suppl 2):95–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kiptoo M, Brooks J, Lihana RW, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance-associated mutations among HIV-1 infected drug-naïve antenatal clinic attendees in rural Kenya. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:517.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rusine J, Asiimwe-Kateera B, van de Wijgert J, Boer KR, Mukantwali E, et al. Low primary and secondary HIV drug-resistance after 12 months of antiretroviral therapy in human immune-deficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals from Kigali, Rwanda. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e64345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064345.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Bila DCA, Young P, Merks H, Vubil AS, Mahomed M, et al. Evolution of primary HIV drug resistance in a subtype C dominated epidemic in Mozambique. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e68213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068213.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017