Effects of bacitracin methylene disalicylate and diet change on gastrointestinal integrity and endotoxin permeability in the duodenum of broiler chicken
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 9 May 2017
Accepted: 31 August 2017
Published: 8 September 2017
To determine the effect of bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) and feed changes on gastrointestinal integrity, endotoxin permeability, and morphometric parameters in the duodenum of broilers.
Birds were raised on a starter diet without growth promoting antibiotics for 31 days then switched to a grower diet. Four of the pens including 50 g/ton of BMD while 4 pens remained antibiotic free. Eight birds per treatment were sampled prior to the feed change and at 3 and 7 days following the feed change. Gastrointestinal integrity and endotoxin permeability in the duodenum were determined using a modified Ussing Chamber and an adjacent section fixed in 10% formalin for morphometric analysis. Data were analyzed using Proc Glimmix of SAS with the model fitting BMD treatment, time, and the interaction of BMD treatment and time as fixed effects. Intestinal integrity increased at d 3 and 7 compared to prior to the feed change and addition of BMD (P > 0.001) and villus height was decreased with BMD supplementation (P = 0.049). All other tested effects similar (P > 0.1). In conclusion, the practice of changing feed had a greater effect on intestinal health than addition of BMD. However, the factors driving these differences 42 are unclear.
Antibiotics have been used in agricultural diets to improve animal performance for several decades . However, concern over antibiotic resistant pathogens has increased the need to identify safe non-antibiotic alternatives . While alternative products have been identified that promote similar growth performance, these products, as a whole, are often not consistent [2–5]. Despite several decades of use, the mode of action for increase growth performance from the use of sub-therapeutic antibiotics is not fully understood. It has been established that the effects of increased performance are limited to modulation of the microfloral communities and/or the interaction of the microfloral communities with the host with animals raised under sterile conditions do not having elevated performance when given oral antibiotics [6, 7], and the removal from hygienic environments can improve the efficacy of sub-therapeutic antibiotics.
Sub-therapeutic antibiotics are known to alter gastrointestinal morphology, weight, length, and integrity [6, 8–11]. However, supplementation starts at hatch and it is unclear the effects of supplementation later in life. Development of the gastrointestinal tract and microbial comminutes within the gastrointestinal tract are generally stabilized at approximately 3 weeks of age [12–14]. Therefore, we wanted to determine if the use of a commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotic, bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) in birds raised without antibiotics would alter gastrointestinal integrity, endotoxin permeability, or morphometric analysis in a stable gastrointestinal tract.
Components of the starter diet and grower diet with and without bacitracin methylene disalicylate
DL methionine (99.5%)
Choline chloride (60%)
Pro-Plusa + Thr and Lys
Prior to the addition of BMD (0 days) and on days 3/4 and 7/8 of BMD inclusion in the diet, individual body weights were collected on 8 (2 randomly chosen birds per pen) birds per treatment. The sample size was selected based on a power analysis and the number of Ussing chambers available. Sampling was split across 2 days with equal numbers of birds from each treatment sampled on each day. Birds were euthanized using cervical dislocation, and a 5 cm section of the descending duodenum was collected, flushed with Krebs-Heinchlet buffer, [11.1 mM dextrose, 1.2 mM Magnesium sulfate, 1.2 mM Potassium phosphate monobasic, 4.7 mM Potassium chloride, 118 mM Sodium chloride, 1 mM Calcium chloride dehydrate, 25 mM Sodium Bicarbonate; pH 7.4], stored in ice cold Krebs-Heinchlet buffer under atmospheric aeration, and transported back to the laboratory to undergo integrity and permeability assays using an easy mount Ussing chamber. A small adjacent section was collected and stored in formalin until histological analysis.
Gastrointestinal integrity and endotoxin permeability
Gastrointestinal integrity as measured by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and endotoxin permeability using previously published methods . Briefly, the serosal layer of the duodenum was removed, the intestine was opened and mounted on an 0.3 cm2 easy mount Ussing chamber (Physiological Instruments, San Diego, CA). The apical and basolateral sides of the tissue were immersed in Krebs-Heinchlet buffer and samples were kept at 39 °C and under continuously aeration with 5% carbon dioxide. Basal resistance was recorded for 10–15 min using the Acquire and Analyze software.
where dQ/dt is the transport rate (µg/s) and corresponds to the slope of the regression line, C0 is the initial concentration in the mucosal side of the chamber (mg/ml) and A is the area of the membrane (0.3 cm2) [10, 15].
Formalin fixed duodenal samples underwent paraffin embedding, sectioning and staining with hematoxylin and eosin at the University of Arkansas microscopy laboratory . Five images per slide of were captured using a Zeiss Imager M2 microscope (Carl zeiss microscopy, LLC., Thornwood, NY) with attached CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Orca ER, Bridgewater, NJ) and Image-Pro Plus software (Media cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD). Villus height, crypt depth and muscularis thickness (n = 5 per bird) were measuring using Image J software [17, 18].
All data were analyzed using mixed models through the Proc Glimmix package of the SAS software  with BMD treatment, day of treatment, and the interaction of BMD treatment and day of treatment fit as fixed effects. For models accounting for weight, the Proc Glimmix package of the SAS software  with BMD treatment, day of treatment, and the interaction of BMD treatment and day of treatment fit as fixed effects, and individual body weight was included as a covariate. Residuals were tested for normality and were found to be normally distributed. Least square means were determined using the LSMeans statement of SAS. If the main treatment effect was significant (P < 0.05), pairwise comparisons were estimated using the pdiff statement in SAS followed by Tukey post hoc adjustment to account for multiple tests in the model .
Changes in body weight, gastrointestinal integrity, and endotoxin permeability over time
Gastrointestinal integrity of the duodenum as measured by transelectrical epithelial resistance (TEER) was different over the course of the study (P < 0.001) with TEER increasing at day 3 and day 7 compared to day 0 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively; Table 2). Gastrointestinal integrity was not altered by supplementation with BMD (P = 0.938) or the interaction between day and BMD supplementation (P = 0.876). Endotoxin permeability was not different with day (P = 0.903), BMD supplementation (P = 0.340), or the interaction between day and BMD supplementation (P = 0.457).
Changes in duodenal morphometric parameters following short term exposure to bacitracin methylene disalicylate
Given body weight was significantly different over the course of the study, and can influence gastrointestinal measurements, we chose to run additional analysis to determine if differences in body weight contribute to the overall changes in TEER, endotoxin permeability, or morphometric analysis. When body weight is included as a covariate, endotoxin permeability was different across day (P = 0.006), increasing at day 7 compared to day 0 (P = 0.019). Neither treatment with BMD (P = 0.338), nor interaction of BMD supplementation and day (P = 0.440) were significant. Addition of body weight to the statistical model, did not alter results observed previously for TEER, but did removed differences in BMD treatment or day effects observed for morphometric analysis. See Additional file 1: Table S2 for P values.
With the use of antibiotics being phased out of animal agriculture, alternatives need to be identified to allow for healthy, efficient animal agriculture. Many alternative have been identified, such as prebiotics and probiotics, however; success rates vary greatly. Therefore, identifying the underlying modes of action for sub-therapeutic antibiotics will be important for the development of alternatives. This study was conducted to understand the effects of sub-therapeutic antibiotics on a stable gastrointestinal tract/microbial community during a mild and routine stressor in poultry production. From our study, only villus height was altered by the use of sub-therapeutic antibiotics, and neither gastrointestinal integrity nor endotoxin permeability are consistently effected by sub-therapeutic antibiotics, but differences were observed when the feed was changed from the starter to grower diet.
Decreased villus height along with increased crypt depth is generally indicative poor intestinal function and has associated with exposure to toxin . In our study, we observed a decrease in villus height with the addition of sub-therapeutic antibiotics, but no change in crypt depth or the ration of villus height to crypt depth. This is consistent with results observed by Miles et al. . This slight decrease in villus height initially with supplementation with sub-therapeutic antibiotics may be due to evolving microbial communities during the initial exposure to sub-therapeutic antibiotics. Growth promoting antibiotics have been shown to decrease Gram positive bacteria in poultry . As a result, the proportion of gram negative bacteria increase and allow for increased exposure to lipopolysaccharide, a component of the gram-negative cell wall which can be used to mimic endotoxic stress . However, in our study, we did not observe differences in other measures of enteric health (e.g. TEER, endotoxin permeability), and the effect of BMD treatment on villus height was lost when body weight was added into the statistical model. Therefore, the change we observed in villus height may reflect differences in individual growth rates of the birds given the small sample size.
Duodenal integrity (TEER) and endotoxin permeability were not consistently altered with BMD supplementation and confirm limited changes to the host in response to the addition of sub-therapeutic antibiotics added to the diet late in production. This is the first study to explore the effects of integrity or endotoxin permeability poultry to our knowledge. In swine, whole gastrointestinal permeability decreased with the use of antibiotics based on urinary lactulose to mannitol ratios . While we did not measure whole gastrointestinal permeability, we expected some changes in duodenal integrity or endotoxin permeability. However, the section of the gastrointestinal tract that we focused is not known for high nutrient rates of absorption  and may reflect differences in looking at the whole gastrointestinal tract versus a single location and differences between species.
A change was noticed in TEER and endotoxin permeability when individual body weight was included in the statistical model with the change from starter to grower diet. Major differences between these diets included a reduction in DL methionine, fat and calcium carbonate, a complete removal of choline chloride, and an increase in vitamins. While several of these nutrients have been associated with changes in intestinal integrity and permeability in poultry , humans , swine , and rodents [27, 28]. Increasing fat inclusion rates has been a primarily linked to decreased intestinal integrity and increased permeability in mice [27, 28] and poultry . While fat inclusion rates were not as high as in previous studies, gastrointestinal integrity increased and endotoxin permeability decreased with the decreased fat content suggesting this could be a contributing factor to gastrointestinal health in poultry.
While this study identified potential underlying mechanisms that alter poultry gastrointestinal health, the lack of performance data, and age matched samples on the different production diets (grower versus starter; and antibiotic free from hatch to BMD from hatch) limits interpretations and thus warrants additional studies to fully understand mechanisms that contribute to gastrointestinal health in poultry.
DAK, HL, CS, and KDC contributed to the design of the project. DAK, MF, DA handled daily care, and conducted farm and laboratory experiments for this project. DAK analyzed the data. DAK and CS interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication is not applicable to this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal work was approved through the University of Arkansas Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC#15067).
Funding for this project was through the Arkansas division of agriculture. The Arkansas division of agriculture did not contribute other than financially to this project.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Dibner JJ, Richards JD. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poult Sci. 2005;84:634–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarangi NR, Babu LK, Kumar A, Pradhan CR, Pati PK, Mishra JP. Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Vet World. 2016;9:313–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Balamuralikrishnan B, Lee SI, Kim IH. Dietary inclusion of different multi-strain complex probiotics; effects on performance in broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2017;58:83–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng YF, Chen YP, Li XH, Yang WL, Wen C, Kang YR, Wang AQ, Zhou YM. Effects of synbiotic supplementation on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and muscular antioxidant capacity and mineral contents in broilers. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97(11):3699–705. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8230.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Majidi-Mosleh A, Sadeghi AA, Mousavi SN, Chamani M, Zarei A. Ileal MUC2 gene expression and microbial population, but not growth performance and immune response, are influenced by in ovo injection of probiotics in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2017;58(1):40–5. doi:10.1080/00071668.2016.1237766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coates ME, Fuller R, Harrison GF, Lev M, Suffolk SF. A comparison of the growth of chicks in the Gustafsson germ- free apparatus and in a conventional environment, with and without dietary supplements of penicillin. Br J Nutr. 1963;17:141–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forbes M, Park J. Growth of germ-free and conventional chicks: effect of diet, dietary penicillin and bacterial environment. J Nutr. 1959;67:69–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roura E, Homedes J, Klasing KC. Prevention of immunologic stress contributes to the growth-permitting ability of dietary antibiotics in chicks. J Nutr. 1992;122:2383–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miles RD, Butcher GD, Henry PR, Littell RC. Effect of antibiotic growth promoters on broiler performance, intestinal growth parameters, and quantitative morphology. Poult Sci. 2006;85:476–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murugesan GR, Gabler NK, Persia ME. Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on broiler performance, intestinal nutrient transport and integrity under experimental conditions with increased microbial challenge. Br Poult Sci. 2014;55:89–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coates ME, Davies MK, Kon SK. The effect of antibiotics on the intestine of the chick. Br J Nutr. 1955;9:110–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neumann AP, Suen G. Differences in major bacterial populations in the intestines of mature broilers after feeding virginiamycin or bacitracin methylene disalicylate. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;119:1515–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranjitkar S, Lawley B, Tannock G, Engberg RM. Bacterial succession in the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2399–410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pan D, Yu Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:108–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomita M, Ohkubo R, Hayashi M. Lipopolysaccharide transport system across colonic epithelial cells in normal and infective rat. Drug Metab Pharmacokin. 2004;19:33–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown DC, Maxwell CV, Erf GF, Davis ME, Singh S, Johnson ZB. The influence of different management systems and ag on intestinal morphology, immune cell numbers and mucin production from goblet cells in post-weaning pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006;15:187–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schnieder CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to Image J: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc.: SAS OnlineDoc 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2011.Google Scholar
- Yason CV, Summers BA, Schat KA. Pathogenesis of rotavirus infection in various age groups of chickens and turkeys: pathology. Am J Vet Res. 1987;48:927–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu J, Hofacre C, Smith F, Lee MD. Effects of feed additives on the development on the ileal bacterial community of the broiler chicken. Animal. 2008;2:669–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang C, Song P, Fan P, Hou C, Thacker P, Ma X. Dietary sodium butyrate decreases postweaning diarrhea by modulating intestinal permeability and changing the bacterial communities in weaned piglets. J Nutr. 2015;145:2774–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scanes CG: 2015 Sturkie’s Avian Physiology. Academic Press. 6th edition. ISBN 978-0-12-407160-5.Google Scholar
- Kuttappan VA, Vicuña EA, Latorre JD, Wolfenden AD, Téllez GI, Hargis BM, Bielke LR. Evaluation of gastrointestinal leakage in multiple enteric inflammation models in chickens. Front Vet Sci. 2015;2:66. doi:10.3389/fvets.2015.00066.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Assa A, Vong L, Pinnell LJ, Rautava J, Avitzur N, Johnson-Henry KC, Sherman PM. Vitamin D deficiency predisposes to adherent-invasive escherichia coli-induced barrier dysfunction and experimental colonic injury. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:297–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mani V, Hollis JH, Gabler NK. Dietary oil composition differentially modulates intestinal endotoxin transport and postprandial endotoxemia. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2013;10:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Müller VM, Zietek T, Rohm F, Fiamoncini J, Lagkouvardos I, Haller D, Clavel T, Daniel H. Gut barrier impairment by high-fat diet in mice depends on housing conditions. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60:897–908.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirpich IA, Feng W, Wang Y, Liu Y, Barker DF, Barve SS, McClain CJ. The type of dietary fat modulates intestinal tight junction integrity, gut permeability, and hepatic toll-like receptor expression in a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012;36:835–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar